1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to the use of augers for controlling the flow of a product over a product attrition device, for example, the flow of potatoes over a potato peeler.
2. Background
Food attrition devices typically comprise an open chamber where product freely tumbles from entrance to exit making contact with various forms of abrasive to remove the product's skin. Contact time, movement of product, and bed height are critical in the process. Examples of food attrition devices and various components thereof are illustrated and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,519,305, U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,429, U.S. Pat. No. 7,197,978, and U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0005715, which are hereby incorporated by reference as illustrative examples.
Because the product can tumble freely in the product attrition device after exiting the auger or before entering the auger, the residence time of any individual unit of product can vary greatly from an average residence time for the product in the food attrition device. As a result, the amount of skin removed from each unit of product can vary, which can be undesirable in terms of reduced efficiency, reduced product capacity, and variable product quality.
Compounding this problem is the fact that existing product attrition devices supply product to a product attrition apparatus at a variable feed rate. For example, even if an existing product attrition device were to use an auger, the feed rate to the auger is variable, which results in fluctuations in volume of product per auger flight.
Previous devices have claimed to use augers to control only a feed rate of product at an entrance of a food attrition device (e.g., U.S. Pub. No. 2006/0005715) or only a discharge rate of a product from the food attrition device (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,519,305). Other devices (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,858,429 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,197,978) have claimed to use an auger to control a feed rate to the food attrition device, but have not provided an auger extending substantially an entire length of a product attrition bed and have not provided a desirable degree of control over the residence time of the product. Nor do these devices provide for feeding a specific volume of product to each pitch length of an auger positioned over a product attrition bed.
For these and other reasons, the utilization of augers as currently practiced in the industry can be improved upon. Accordingly, it would be desirable if a product attrition apparatus provided a controlled residence time without substantially inhibiting product tumbling and could maintain a desired bed height from entrance to exit of the product attrition device with a high degree of predictability and repeatability (e.g., low standard deviation in residence time and/or bed height for each pitch length of an auger).
For example, it would be desirable if an auger extended the entire length of an abrasive so it could control residence time of particles over the abrasive.
It would be desirable if a first auger section had a larger pitch to avoid inhibiting product motion, but a second auger section comprised a flow restriction device to maintain a higher bed height of the product along a greater length of the auger, and thereby maintain a higher bed height along a greater length of an abrasive for removing skin from a product.
For example, it would be desirable if the auger comprised a first auger section with a larger pitch to avoid restricting product tumbling and a second auger section with a smaller pitch for maintaining the bed height of the product over the abrasive.
It would also be desirable if the auger comprised a first auger section with a larger pitch to avoid restricting product tumbling and a second auger section with multiple auger flights for maintaining the bed height of the product over the abrasive.
As another example, it would be desirable if the auger comprised a first auger section with a larger pitch to avoid restricting product tumbling and a second auger section with a rotary gate to maintain the bed height of the product over the abrasive.
Furthermore, it would be desirable if a product attrition apparatus were provided with a controlled volumetric feed rate. For example, it would be desirable to limit variations in the volumetric feed rate to the auger and thereby limit fluctuations in volume of product per auger flight.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a product attrition apparatus with improved flow control for a product comprising a plurality of product units. The product attrition apparatus comprises a product attrition bed and an auger positioned above the product attrition bed. The product attrition bed abrades the product while the auger conveys the product in a flow direction. The auger comprises a rotational axis of the auger oriented parallel to the flow direction, an auger flight coiled around the rotational axis, a first auger section, and a second auger section downstream of the first auger section. The auger is configured in relation to the product attrition bed to form a charge space for substantially confining a product charge of the product. As the auger rotates on the rotational axis, the charge space moves in the flow direction, thereby moving the product charge in the flow direction. Additionally, the first auger section comprises a minimum pitch of about 4 times an average equivalent spherical diameter of the product, and the second auger section comprises a flow restriction mechanism to restrict a discharge flow of the product from the auger.
In a second aspect, the present invention provides a method for using an auger to control a flow of a product over a product attrition bed. The product comprises a plurality of product units, and the auger conveys the product above the product attrition bed in a flow direction while the product attrition bed abrades the product. The method comprises the steps: feeding the product to the auger to provide a product charge; substantially confining the product charge in a charge space; rotating the auger to move the charge space, and thereby the product charge, in the flow direction; and discharging the product charge from the auger through a flow restriction mechanism to provide a discharge flow of the product. Furthermore, a first end of the charge space and a second end of the charge space are bounded by the auger; a bottom of the charge space is bounded by the product attrition bed; the first auger section of the auger is upstream of a second auger section of the auger; and the second auger section comprises the flow restriction mechanism to restrict the discharge flow of the product.
In a third aspect, the present invention provides an apparatus for providing one control volume of a product to an auger per revolution of the auger. The auger extends the length of a product attrition bed for abrading the product as it is conveyed by the auger in a charge space. The charge space is bounded by the auger and the product attrition bed.
In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a method for controlling a volumetric feed rate of product to an auger positioned over a product attrition bed, said method comprising the steps: feeding one control volume of product to an auger per revolution of the auger; rotating the auger to convey the product in a charge space bounded by the auger and the product attrition bed; abrading the product by contact with the product attrition bed; and discharging the control volume from the auger. The auger extends the length of a product attrition bed.
The invention described herein provides for several advantages in its various embodiments. In one aspect, the invention provides a controlled residence time without substantially inhibiting product tumbling and maintains a desired bed height from entrance to exit of the product attrition device with a high degree of predictability and repeatability (e.g., low standard deviation in residence time and/or bed height for each pitch length of an auger).
In another aspect, the invention provides for an auger that extends the entire length of an abrasive to the control residence time of particles over the abrasive.
Additionally, the invention provides for a first auger section comprising a larger pitch to avoid inhibiting product motion, and a second auger section comprising a flow restriction device to maintain a higher bed height of the product along a greater length of the auger. Accordingly, the invention provides for maintaining a higher bed height along a greater length of an abrasive for removing skin from the product.
For example, the invention provides for an auger comprising a first auger section with a larger pitch to avoid restricting product tumbling and a second auger section with a smaller pitch for maintaining the bed height of the product over the abrasive.
As another example, the invention provides for an auger comprising a first auger section with a larger pitch to avoid restricting product tumbling and a second auger section with multiple auger flights for maintaining the bed height of the product over the abrasive.
Additionally, the invention provides for an auger comprising a first auger section with a larger pitch to avoid restricting product tumbling and a second auger section with a rotary gate to maintain the bed height of the product over the abrasive.
In another aspect, the invention provides a product attrition apparatus with a controlled volumetric feed rate. For example, in one aspect, the invention limits variations in the volumetric feed rate to the auger and thereby limits fluctuations in volume of product per auger flight.
The novel features believed characteristic of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. The invention itself, however, as well as a preferred mode of use, further objectives and advantages thereof, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description of illustrative embodiments when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
In developing the invention disclosed herein, the inventors realized that it is useful to design an auger 104 based on the size of product 502 conveyed. For example, using an auger 104 with a smaller pitch 302 (e.g., less than about 4 times the average equivalent spherical diameter 514) advantageously produces a lower standard deviation in residence time relative to a larger pitch 202 (e.g., greater than about 4 times the average equivalent spherical diameter 514). However, a smaller pitch 302 can be problematic because it restricts product movement due to contact with the auger surface which can prevent exposure of all product surfaces to an abrasive 154.
Accordingly, the inventors worked to develop an auger 104 with a single larger pitch size (e.g., 750 mm pitch) to provide substantially free product mixing and tumbling. The auger 104 was used in a product attrition apparatus with a stationary S shaped exit gate and was positioned about ¼ inch above an abrasive 154. The auger 104 did not extend the full length of an abrasive 154; however, the auger stretched over a substantial portion of the abrasive to help prevent back-mixing, control the residence time of the product over the abrasive, and provide a more uniform degree of product attrition (e.g., peeling). The first end 208 of the auger was a distance (e.g. about a foot) from an entrance to the product attrition bed 102. Likewise, the second end 210 of the auger was a distance from the exit of the product attrition bed.
Using a larger pitch auger helped address the problem of restricted product movement because the larger pitch resulted in less restricted motion. However, because the auger 104 had a single larger pitch, when the last auger pitch opened to discharge product, the bed height 516b dropped over a relatively larger distance from the exit of the auger (e.g., the distance across a terminal portion 536 of the auger).
This can be undesirable because the loss in bed height reduces the normal force between the product and the abrasive 154. The reduction in normal force, in turn, results in a loss of potential peeling capacity for a length of the abrasive 154 (e.g., the length under the lower bed height 516b).
The inventors also realized other problems. For example, since the auger flight 106 did not extend the entire length of the abrasive 154, free mixing (e.g., loss of control over residence time for product) occurred over the abrasive 154 before the first end 402 of the auger flight 106 and after the second end 404 of the auger flight.
In order to address the problem of free mixing, the inventors designed (e.g., using a computer and a discrete elements method to model the product flow) a larger pitch auger 104 with an auger flight 106 that extended the full length of a product attrition bed 102. For example, the auger flight 106 extended an entire length of an abrasive 154 on the surface of product attrition bed. This advantageously provided plug flow of the product 502 within a flight 106 of the auger 104. For example, the product 502 formed a plurality of product charges 512 and each product charge was substantially confined in a charge space 510 formed between two portions of the auger 104 and the abrasive 154. As a result, the auger 104 reduced back-mixing of product from a downstream portion of the product attrition bed 102 to an upstream portion of the product attrition bed. The auger 104 also provided a more controlled residence time of each unit 502 of product in a product charge 512, and a more uniform attrition (e.g., peeling) of product within each product charge. The auger 104 also enabled operators to decrease residence time, or increase the speed at which product 502 travels across the product attrition bed 102.
Nonetheless, the larger pitch, full-length auger still presented several potential problems. For example, stagnation resulted at a pinch point between the second end 404 of the auger flight 106 and the stationary exit gate of the product attrition bed 102. Additionally, some back-mixing occurred at the exit gate of the product attrition bed.
The inventors addressed these issues by removing the stationary exit gate from the product attrition bed 102 (e.g., using the computer model). This removed the pinch point between the stationary exit gate and the auger 104. Removing the stationary exit gate also reduced back-mixing.
However, the inventors realized that removing the gate without providing the auger 104 with a flow restriction mechanism would result in a loss of bed height 516 within the final pitch length before the exit end of the auger. As a result, the peeling capacity of the abrasive 154 would be reduced along the final pitch length of the auger.
In order to mitigate the pinch point problem associated with the stationary gate, while still maintaining bed height at the end of the auger, the inventors decided to add a flow restriction mechanism to the second end 210 of the auger itself (e.g., using the computer model).
One example of a flow restriction mechanism is a rotary gate 406 fixed to the second end 404 of a larger pitch, full length auger flight 106. In one embodiment, the rotary gate 406 is fixed to the second end 404 of the auger flight and located in a plane that is perpendicular to the rotational axis 506 of the auger 104. The rotary gate 406 extends in the same direction as the auger flight 106, and the gate has substantially the same radius 138 as the auger flight.
The rotary gate 406 blocks the discharge flow 155 of product from a blocked area at the exit of the auger. The blocked area is defined by the sweep of the radius of the rotary gate, which sweeps from the second end 404 of the auger flight for a selected angle (e.g., greater than 0 degrees, greater than 0 degrees but a maximum of 270 degrees, or from about 90 to about 180 degrees, inclusive).
Using an auger 104 with a rotary gate 406 results in less stagnation at the second end 210 of the auger and reduces back-mixing. However, the inventors realized that additional improvements were possible.
Accordingly, the inventors developed a larger pitch, full-length auger, with another type of flow restriction mechanism (e.g., using the computer model). Namely, the inventors developed an auger 104 that comprises a first auger section 108 (e.g., upstream auger section) and a second auger section 110 (e.g., downstream auger section) with a smaller pitch 302 than the first auger section 108. As a result of using a smaller pitch 302 in the second auger section 110, the bed height 516c over a first portion 110a (e.g., upstream portion) of the second auger section 110 is increased relative to what it would have been if the second auger section 110 did not have a smaller pitch.
However, the inventors again realized that additional improvements were possible. For example, if the smaller pitch is ½ the larger pitch in the first auger section 108, the linear velocity of the product over the product attrition bed 102 is cut in half. This is because product 502 only travels 1 pitch per revolution (or turn) of the auger 104 so the linear velocity of the product in the auger is the pitch divided by the time required for one revolution of the auger. Thus, the linear velocity of product 502 passing through the second auger section 110 becomes a limiting factor (e.g., bottleneck) for the overall linear velocity of the product conveyed by the auger.
Accordingly, the inventors developed a different type of flow restriction mechanism for the second auger section 110 (e.g., using the computer model). Namely, the inventors developed a second auger section 110 with a plurality of auger flights 206 (e.g., a double flight).
In one embodiment, the second auger flight 204 of the double flight 206 extends for a fraction of a revolution, (e.g., ½ revolution or 180 degrees) from second end 404 of a first auger flight 106. Additionally, the second auger flight 204 has the same shape as the first flight, but is out of phase with the first flight by a phase shift angle 924 (e.g., 180 degrees).
One benefit of using a plurality of flights 206 is that linear velocity of the product in the second auger section 110 is the same as the linear velocity of the product in the first auger section 108. Accordingly, using a plurality of flights 206 does not result in a bottle neck in the second auger section 110.
Nonetheless, the inventors realized that further improvements were possible. For example, the inventors realized that the volumetric feed rate to an auger can vary (e.g., +/−15%). Because the bed height in a charge space 510 of the auger is dependent upon the volume of product fed into the charge space, variations in the volumetric feed rate cause variations in bed height from one charge space to another. This, in turn, causes less predictable results (e.g., the standard deviation of the residence time of a product unit 502 can be greater than desired).
In order to address this issue, the inventors determined that it would be desirable to provide the auger 104 with one fixed volume of variable sized product units 502 per revolution of the auger. Accordingly, the inventors developed (e.g., using the computer model) a method and apparatus for controlling the volumetric feed rate to an auger.
For example, in one embodiment, a container 116, such as a hopper, can be added to a product attrition apparatus and used to intermittently empty product 502 into the product attrition bed 102. This advantageously provides each charge space 510 along the auger 104 with approximately the same volume of product, the same product bed height, and the same pressure between the product and the abrasive 154.
However, the inventors realized that retrofitting a product attrition apparatus to include a feed hopper would be expensive. Accordingly, the inventors developed a less costly method for retrofitting a product attrition apparatus. Namely, the inventors added a primary gate 120 (e.g., slide gate) to a downstream portion of a feed chute 118 for an auger 104 and a secondary gate 124 (e.g., slide gate) to an upstream portion of the feed chute. This creates a volume bounded on its bottom and sides by the feed chute, primary gate, and secondary gate. A sensor 128 (e.g., level sensor) is used to measure the volume of product.
While product 502 is accumulating between the primary gate 120 and the secondary gate 124, the primary gate is closed but the secondary gate is open. Then, when a desired volume 112 of product has accumulated, the secondary gate closes and the primary gate opens to discharge the product to the auger 104.
Advantageously, when using some embodiments of the invention described herein, an operator of a product attrition bed 102 can independently control several important parameters that determine the degree of attrition (e.g., peeling) experienced by a product 502. First, an operator can control the angular velocity 926 (e.g., revolutions per minute) of auger 104, which, in turn, enables an operator to control residence time for each product charge 512. Second, an operator can control the volumetric feed rate 122 to the auger (e.g., volume of product fed to the auger per revolution), which, in turn, controls the bed height of product in each charge of the auger. Third, an operator can control the speed an abrasive 154 (e.g., the speed of roller brushes used to abrade the product).
An embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to
First, in a feeding step 1002, product 502 is fed to the auger 104 to provide a product charge 512.
Second, in a confining step 1004, the product 502 is completely or substantially confined in a charge space 510. As illustrated, for example, in
Third, in an abrading step 1006, the product charge 512 is abraded by an abrasive 154 (e.g., bristles or blades).
Fourth, in a rotating step 1008, the auger 104 is rotated to move the charge space 510, and thereby the product charge 512, in the flow direction 504.
Fifth, in a discharging step 1010, the product charge 512 is discharged from the auger 104 through a flow restriction mechanism (e.g., reduced pitch 302, a plurality of auger flights 206, or a rotary gate 406) to provide a discharge flow 155 of the product 502.
In some embodiments, the product 502 comprises a plurality of product units 502a,b (e.g., potatoes, vegetables, etc.), and the product attrition bed 102 abrades at least an outer surface (e.g., skin and/or peeling) of one of the product units 502a,b.
With reference to
Similarly, the feeding step 1002, can be accomplished in a variety of ways. For example, in some embodiments, one control volume 112 of the product 502 is fed to the auger 104 per revolution of the auger to provide a product charge 512. In one embodiment, the control volume 112 varies by a maximum of +/− about 5% to 20% from a specified volume. In one embodiment, the volumetric feed rate of product to the auger has a standard deviation of approximately 20%.
One example of a feeding step 1002, is illustrated in the flow chart of
Although the invention has been described with reference to a gate, in some embodiments, a flow control mechanism can be used in place of the gate. For example, the secondary gate can be a secondary control mechanism, which can, in turn be any device or structure to regulate (e.g., completely obstruct) the flow of product downstream of the secondary control mechanism and upstream of the primary gate. Examples of secondary control mechanisms include a sliding gate, or a conveyor (e.g., endless conveyor) for the product that can be started and stopped. Accordingly, as used in this context, a secondary control mechanism is open when it enables or causes product to flow past the secondary control mechanism to a position (e.g., along a chute) that is downstream of the secondary control mechanism and upstream of the primary gate. Similarly, as used in this context, a secondary control mechanism is closed when it prevents or stops causing product to flow past the secondary control mechanism to a position (e.g., along a chute) that is downstream of the secondary control mechanism and upstream of the primary gate.
As desired, the steps of
As another example of a feeding step 1002, a control volume 112 or a fraction of a control volume 112 of the product 502 can be fed to the auger 104 from a conveyor 114 comprising a plurality of containers 116. For example, in one embodiment, the invention comprises a conveyor 114 for feeding a control volume 112 or a fraction of a control volume 112 of product to the auger 104. The conveyor 114 comprises a plurality of containers 116 (e.g., buckets) and each container 116 is sized to contain (e.g., has a volume equal to) the control volume 112 or a fraction of a control volume 112. The conveyor 114 feeds the auger 104 one control volume 112 of product 502 from one or more containers 116 in the plurality of containers per revolution of the auger.
With reference again to
As illustrated in
Turning again to
In some embodiments, the flow restriction mechanism is selected from the group consisting of a rotary gate 406, a downstream portion of the auger (e.g., the second auger section 110) with smaller pitch 302 than an upstream portion of the auger (e.g. the first auger section 108), and a plurality of auger flights 206.
As illustrated in
In some embodiments, the flow restriction mechanism is positioned downstream of a second end 146 (e.g., downstream end) of the product attrition bed 102 to maintain a minimum bed height (e.g., bed height 516c) for substantially an entire length 109 of the product attrition bed. For example, in some embodiments, a portion of an auger 104 comprising the flow restriction mechanism extends downstream of the second end 146 of a product attrition bed 102. Furthermore, in some embodiments the length 216 of an auger flight 106 is greater than the length 109 of a product attrition bed 102.
In some embodiments, the charge space 510 is divided (e.g., partially or completely) in the second auger section 110 by an additional auger flight 204 to form an upstream division (e.g., first portion 110a of the second auger section) and a downstream division (e.g., second portion 110b of the second auger section), thereby limiting the amount of the product charge 512 that loses bed height when the second end 522 (e.g., downstream end or leading end) of the charge space 510 is opened. For example, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, for example, as shown in
In some embodiments, a rotary gate 406 is provided in the second auger section 110 to constrain the discharge of product 502 from the second auger section 110. For example, the rotary gate 406 can be positioned at the second end 210 of the auger 104 (e.g., downstream or leading end of the auger). Furthermore, the rotary gate 406 can be positioned at the second end 404 of the auger flight 106.
As illustrated in
One embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to
The product attrition bed 102 comprises a first end 144 of the product attrition bed 102, a second end 146 of the product attrition bed 102, a cavity 153 (e.g., trough or cylindrically shaped chamber) that extends from the first end 144 of the product attrition bed 102 to the second end 146 of the product attrition bed 102, and an abrasive 154 that is positioned and oriented to face the auger and that substantially covers the entire surface of the product attrition bed 102.
The auger comprises a rotational axis 506 of the auger oriented in the flow direction 504, an auger flight 106 coiled around the rotational axis 506, a first auger section 108, and a second auger section 110 downstream of the first auger section 108.
As illustrated in
As shown in
In the examples shown in
As illustrated in
As shown in
As illustrated in
As shown in
In one embodiment, the second auger section 110 comprises a maximum pitch 302 of about 4, about 5, or about 6 times an average equivalent spherical diameter 514 of the product. For example, in a first section it can be useful to have a pitch 202 greater than 5 times an average equivalent spherical diameter 514, and in a second section it can be useful to have a pitch 302 less than 2.5 times the average equivalent spherical diameter 514.
In some embodiments a pitch 202 of the first auger section 108 is substantially constant for the entirety of the first auger section 108. Additionally, in some embodiments, a pitch 302 of the second auger section 110 is substantially constant for the entirety of the second auger section 110.
With reference, for example, to
As illustrated, for example, in
As illustrated in
With reference to
In some embodiments, the minimum bed height 516c is a minimum fraction of the average bed height of the product 502 over the length 109 of the product attrition bed 102. For example, in one embodiment, the minimum fraction is at least about 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%.
In some embodiments, a minimum bed height is a minimum fraction of the bed height (or average bed height) in the first (e.g., most upstream) closed product charge of the auger. For example, in one embodiment, the minimum fraction is at least 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%.
In some embodiments, as illustrated for example in
As illustrated, for example, in
As illustrated in
Although the invention is described herein in terms of a charge space 510, the charge space 510 can be one of a plurality of charge spaces 510. For example, in one embodiment, the product (e.g., a product charge 512) is confined in at least one charge space 510. As another example, in some embodiments, the auger 104 is configured in relation to the product attrition bed 102 to form a plurality of charge spaces 510 for confining a plurality of product charges 512, respectively.
Similarly, although the invention is described in terms of a product charge 512, the product charge 512 can be one of a plurality of product charges 512. For example, in one embodiment, the auger 104 conveys at least one product charge 512. As another example, in some embodiments, the auger 104 is configured in relation to the product attrition bed 102 to convey a plurality of product charges 512.
With reference to
The second product attrition bed 102 is identical to the first product attrition bed 102. Furthermore, the first auger 104 and the second auger 104 have the same auger length 218 and radius, and an initial portion 534 of the first auger is identical to a first auger section 108 of the second auger. Additionally, a terminal portion 536 of the first auger has generally the same configuration (e.g., same pitch, same number of auger flights, same radius, and/or absence of flow restriction mechanism such as rotary gates) as the initial portion 534 of the first auger and the first auger section 108 of the second auger.
However, the second auger section 110 of the second auger 104 advantageously differs from the first auger section 108 of the second auger, the terminal portion 536 of the first auger, and the initial portion 534 of the first auger. For example, the second auger section 110 of the second auger comprises a flow restriction mechanism, which is beneficial because it helps to maintain a minimum bed height 516c of product 502 over the product attrition bed 102. A minimum bed height 516c, in turn, increases the weight of product 502 over the product attrition bed 102 and helps maintain a desirable level of force (e.g., pressure, static head) between an abrasive 154 of the product attrition bed 102 and the product 502.
As illustrated in
The increase and the decrease in the total number of product units over time can be seen in the curves plotted in
As can be seen, both product attrition beds have an average steady state count of around 143 product units. However, the amplitude for the single pitch, single flight auger illustrated in
Given an average particle size, the number of particles in a product attrition bed is proportional to the volume of the particles. Furthermore, given a substantially constant bed height until the exit end of the auger, the total number of particles in the auger varies primarily with the bed height at the second end of an auger. Accordingly, the product attrition bed of
With reference to
As illustrated in
In some embodiments, an auger flight 106 begins to open (e.g., discharge a product charge 512 at the second end 210 of the auger) when at least a portion of a second end 404 of the auger flight 106, 204 rotates into a position below horizontal (e.g., a position below parallel to the reference vector 914 in
The following clauses are offered as further description of the disclosed invention:
1. A product attrition apparatus with improved flow control for a product, wherein the product comprises a plurality of product units, said product attrition apparatus comprising:
a product attrition bed; and
an auger positioned above the product attrition bed;
wherein the product attrition bed abrades the product while the auger conveys the product in a flow direction;
wherein the auger comprises:
wherein the auger is configured in relation to the product attrition bed to form a charge space for substantially confining a product charge of the product;
wherein, as the auger rotates on the rotational axis, the charge space moves in the flow direction, thereby moving the product charge in the flow direction;
wherein the first auger section comprises a minimum pitch of about 4 times an average equivalent spherical diameter of the product;
wherein the second auger section comprises a flow restriction mechanism to restrict a discharge flow of the product from the auger.
2. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, wherein the auger flight extends substantially an entire length of the product attrition bed.
3. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, wherein an entire length of the auger flight is greater than an entire length of the product attrition bed.
4. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, wherein the flow restriction mechanism is positioned downstream of a downstream end of the product attrition bed to maintain a minimum bed height for an entire length of the product attrition bed.
5. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, wherein the second auger section comprises at least one additional auger flight.
6. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, wherein the second auger section comprises a pitch that is smaller than a pitch of the first auger section.
7. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, wherein the second auger section comprises a maximum pitch of about 6 times an average equivalent spherical diameter of the product.
8. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, wherein the auger flight comprises a first end of the auger flight and a second end of the auger flight downstream of the first end of the auger flight; wherein the second auger section comprises a rotary gate, and wherein the rotary gate is fixed to the second end of the auger flight.
9. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, wherein a drive shaft of the auger is fixed to a second end of the auger flight, and wherein the drive shaft of the auger does not extend along a length of the auger flight.
10. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, wherein the auger comprises a first end of the auger flight and a second end of the auger flight downstream of the first end of the auger flight; wherein the auger comprises a drive shaft, wherein the drive shaft extends along the auger flight for a shaft length from the second end of the auger flight; and wherein the shaft length is substantially less than an entire length of the auger flight.
11. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, wherein the auger flight does not contact the product attrition bed.
12. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, further comprising:
a container for providing one control volume of the product to the apparatus per revolution of the auger.
13. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, further comprising:
a conveyor for feeding a control volume of product to the auger;
wherein the conveyor comprises a plurality of containers;
wherein each container is sized to contain a specific volume;
wherein the specific volume is not greater than the control volume;
wherein dividing the control volume by the specific volume results substantially in an integer;
wherein the conveyor feeds the auger one control volume of product per revolution of the auger by feeding the auger the specific volume from at least one container in the plurality of containers per revolution of the auger.
14. The apparatus of clause 1 or 24, further comprising:
a container,
wherein the container comprises:
a feed chute for feeding product to the auger;
a primary gate for controlling a feed of product from the chute to the auger; and
a secondary control mechanism for controlling a feed of product to the chute;
wherein the primary gate is downstream of the secondary control mechanism.
15. A method for using an auger to control a flow of a product over a product attrition bed, wherein the product comprises a plurality of product units, wherein the auger conveys the product above the product attrition bed in a flow direction while the product attrition bed abrades the product, said method comprising the steps:
feeding the product to the auger to provide a product charge;
substantially confining the product charge in a charge space, wherein a first end of the charge space and a second end of the charge space are bounded by the auger, and wherein a bottom of the charge space is bounded by the product attrition bed;
rotating the auger to move the charge space, and thereby the product charge, in the flow direction; and
discharging the product charge from the auger through a flow restriction mechanism to provide a discharge flow of the product;
wherein a first auger section of the auger is upstream of a second auger section of the auger; and
wherein the second auger section comprises the flow restriction mechanism to restrict the discharge flow of the product.
16. The method of clause 15 or 25, further comprising:
dividing the charge space in the second auger section to form an upstream division and a downstream division, thereby limiting the amount of the product charge that loses bed height when the second end of the charge space is opened;
wherein the second end of the charge space is a downstream end of the charge space.
17. The method of clause 15 or 25, further comprising:
reducing a length of the charge space in the second auger section relative to the length of the charge space in the first auger section.
18. The method of clause 15 or 25, further comprising:
using a rotary gate to restrict the discharge flow of product from the second auger section.
19. The method of clause 15 or 25, further comprising:
driving the rotation of the auger by applying a force to a drive shaft fixed to a an end of an auger flight of the auger, wherein the drive shaft does not extend along a length of the auger flight.
20. The method of clause 15 or 25, further comprising:
driving the rotation of the auger by applying a force to a drive shaft that extends a shaft length from an end of an auger flight of the auger, wherein the shaft length is substantially less than an entire length of the auger flight.
21. The method of clause 15 or 25, wherein the feeding step further comprises:
feeding a control volume of the product to the auger to provide the product charge.
22. The method of clause 15 or 25, wherein the feeding step further comprises:
feeding a control volume of the product to the auger from a conveyor comprising a plurality of containers, wherein each container has a volume not greater than the control volume.
23. The method of clause 15 or 25, wherein the feeding step further comprises:
conveying the product into a chute while a primary gate of the chute is closed and while a secondary control mechanism of the chute is open, wherein the secondary control mechanism is positioned upstream of the primary gate;
measuring a volume of the product accumulated upstream of the primary gate and downstream of the secondary control mechanism;
closing the secondary control mechanism after a specific volume of the product has accumulated upstream of the primary gate and downstream of the secondary control mechanism, wherein the specific volume is not greater than the control volume;
opening the primary gate to discharge the specific volume of the product to the auger to provide at least a portion of the product charge;
closing the primary gate and opening the secondary control mechanism after discharging the specific volume of product to the auger.
24. An apparatus for providing one control volume of a product to an auger per revolution of the auger, wherein the auger extends the length of a product attrition bed for abrading the product as it is conveyed by the auger in a charge space, and wherein the charge space is bounded by the auger and the product attrition bed, said apparatus comprising:
a container; and
a conveyor for feeding product to the container;
wherein the container is sized to hold a specific volume;
wherein dividing the control volume by the specific volume results substantially in an integer; and
wherein the container comprises at least a portion of a feed chute for the auger.
25. A method for controlling a volumetric feed rate of product to an auger positioned over a product attrition bed, said method comprising the steps:
feeding one control volume of the product to the auger per revolution of the auger, wherein the one control volume is accumulated in a hopper before being fed to the auger;
rotating the auger to convey the product in a charge space bounded by the auger and the product attrition bed;
abrading the product by contact with the product attrition bed; and
discharging the control volume from the auger;
wherein the auger extends the length of the product attrition bed.
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.