1. Field of the Invention
The present invention generally relates to automatically retractable hypodermic syringes and blood taking devices, and more specifically to a method and apparatus for controlling the speed of retraction of an automatically retractable hypodermic needle.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Due to the advent of AIDS and other blood transmittable diseases, it has become extremely important to find a way to safely dispose of hypodermic needles and needles from blood taking devices, such as those shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,838,869, directed to a retractable needle syringe, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,838.863, directed to a retractable needle used in collecting body fluids, both having issued to the same inventor hereof.
In some environments, it has been found desirable to control the speed of retraction of the needle during the retraction process. It is not believed that this particular problem has been previously addressed. Some specific issues that must be considered in solving this problem are the frictional forces being exerted on the needle, the mass of the moving parts, and the friction of flesh on the needle as the needle is removed from the flesh of the patient. One must also consider the effect on the speed of the needle as it tears through the diaphragm of the plunger during the retraction process, keeping in mind that the retracting needle must provide enough force to rupture the diaphragm of the plunger.
It is therefore a primary object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for controlling the retraction speed of a needle during the period when the needle is being automatically retracted from the flesh of a patient.
Several techniques for accomplishing this purpose are described herein, to include the use of a conical spring, an o-ring or the addition of mass to the needle mechanism to control the speed of retraction of the needle.
The foregoing and other objects, aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
Now looking at
As is obvious from
Looking specifically at the variable force spring 20, a conical spring will meet the necessary criteria and will produce a lower force at the beginning of movement and then increase the force as the spring expands, whereas the helical spring will produce a constant force during its expansion. Using a conical spring for control of the needle movement would apply less of a force at the beginning of movement and consequently reduce the acceleration at the onset of motion. This would accordingly reduce the possibility of any damage to the flesh upon retraction of the needle.
Without enumerating the specific calculations, it is well known that a differential equation representing the motion of a needle retracting from the flesh of a human body can be solved analytically, and shows that the speed of retraction depends directly on the frictional forces of the needle rubbing against the o-ring 23, the mass of the moving parts, and the friction due to the needle pulling away from flesh. In reference to the o-ring type seal, applying more pressure on the needle by using an o-ring having a smaller internal diameter increases friction and consequently slows down the moving needle.
It is possible to apply a pressure that will prevent any retraction, or apply a slight pressure that hardly hampers speed at all. Also, it is possible to reduce spring forces by selecting a weaker spring in order to slow down the needle but this is not a solution for some situations. In the case of the retracting needle assembly, the needle must move fast enough to tear through the diaphragm on the plunger. After tearing through the diaphragm the needle still must be pulled from the human body. The energy in the compressed spring is used to overcome friction forces, the body friction force, the work of tearing through the diaphragm, and to transfer kinetic energy to the needle assembly. Using the seal as a brake slows down the needle but allows the needle to be withdrawn completely.
The expression for needle movement shows that increasing the mass of the moving parts can be used to slow down the movement. The kinetic energy of the moving parts is given by KE=mv2/2. Clearly, increasing the mass by a factor of say 4, decreases the velocity (speed) by a factor of two. The needles mass can be increased by using a cylindrical mass 22 attached to the needle.
While the invention has been described in terms of a single preferred embodiment, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.