Method and apparatus for controlling vacuum as a function of ultrasonic power in an ophthalmic phaco aspirator

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6425883
  • Patent Number
    6,425,883
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, August 11, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 30, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
An aspiration system that may include a control valve to allow a flow of fluid into an aspiration line and vary a vacuum pressure within the line. The system may include a pressure transducer that is coupled to the aspiration line by a sensor line and a check valve. The check valve prevents a back flow of fluid from the aspiration line to the pressure line. The system may further have a control circuit that is coupled to the pressure transducer and the control valve. The control circuit may control the control valve and regulate the vacuum pressure within the aspiration line. The control circuit may receive an input signal that also controls a medical handpiece. The input signal can be generated by a foot pedal that also controls the handpiece. The system may thus have one foot pedal that can control the handpiece and the vacuum pressure of the aspiration line.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to a power source for an ultrasonically driven surgical handpiece.




2. Background Information




The lens of a human eye may develop a cataracteous condition which affects a patients vision. Cataracteous lenses are sometimes removed and replaced in a procedure commonly referred to as phacoemulsification. Phaco procedures are typically performed with an ultrasonically driven handpiece which is used to break the lens. The broken lens is removed through an aspiration line that is coupled to the handpiece. The aspiration line is connected to a pump which creates a vacuum pressure within the line.




The handpiece has a tip which is inserted through an incision in the cornea. The handpiece typically contains a number of ultrasonic transducers which convert electrical power into a mechanical oscillating movement of the tip. The distal end of the tip has an opening which is in fluid communication with the aspiration line. The oscillating movement of the tip breaks the lens into small pieces that are then drawn into the aspiration line through the tip opening.




The handpiece is connected to a console that contains a power source which drives the ultrasonic transducers. The power provided to the transducers can be controlled by the surgeon through a foot pedal that is connected to the console. During a phaco procedure a piece of the broken lens may be too large to be drawn through the tip. Such a condition may create an occlusion at the tip opening. The surgeon can further break up the piece by depressing the foot pedal and increasing the power to the transducers.




The tip occlusion reduces the vacuum pressure within the aspiration line downstream from the cornea. When the occlusion is removed there is a sudden change in pressure within the cornea. The sudden change in pressure may collapse the cornea. The surgeon must perform the procedure with skill to insure that this event does not occur.




U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,127 issued to Barwick Jr. et al. discloses a phaco system that senses the vacuum pressure within the aspiration line and varies the speed of the pump when the line pressure falls below a threshold vacuum level. The reduction in pump speed lowers the rate at which the vacuum pressure decreases while the aspiration line is occluded. Because of mechanical and pneumatic inertia, there is typically a time delay between when the vacuum pressure falls below the threshold value and when the reduced pump speed lowers the vacuum pressure. This time delay may allow an undesirable increase in the vacuum pressure of the aspiration line.




U.S. Pat. No. 4,395,258 issued to Wang et al. discloses an aspiration system that contains a pair of electronically controlled valves to control the vacuum pressure within an aspiration line. One of the valves controls the flow between the aspiration line and a vacuum pump. The other valve controls the flow of air from the atmosphere into the aspiration line. The valves are switched between open and closed positions by a controller that receives a feedback signal from a pressure transducer. The pressure transducer senses the vacuum pressure within the aspiration line.




The controller receives an input signal from a foot pedal that can be depressed by the surgeon. The controller compares the feedback signal from the pressure transducer with the input signal from the foot pedal. The controller can open and/or close either control valve based on the comparision between the two input signals. When used with an ultrasonically driven handpiece the Wang system requires two foot pedals. One foot pedal for the handpiece and another foot pedal for the aspiration system. It would be desirable to provide an ultrasonically driven handpiece/aspiration system that has only one foot pedal and automatically controls the vacuum pressure of the aspiration line.




The pressure transducer is typically in fluid communication with the aspiration line. After each procedure the transducer must be disconnected from the aspiration line and sterilized. Such a procedure takes time. Additionally, the sterilization process may degrade the pressure sensor. It would be desirable to provide a non-invasive pressure transducer assembly for an aspiration system.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




One embodiment of the present invention is an aspiration system that may include a control valve to allow a flow of fluid into an aspiration line and vary a vacuum pressure within the line. The system may include a pressure transducer that is coupled to the aspiration line by a sensor line and a check valve. The check valve prevents a back flow of fluid from the aspiration line to the pressure line. The system may further have a control circuit that is coupled to the pressure transducer and the control valve. The control circuit may control the control valve and regulate the vacuum pressure within the aspiration line. The control circuit may receive an input signal that also controls a medical handpiece.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic of an embodiment of an ultrasonic surgical system of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a schematic of a power source of the system;





FIG. 3

is a schematic of an alternate embodiment of an aspiration system.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION




One embodiment of the present invention is an ultrasonic surgical system which has a feedback loop that varies a power provided to an ultrasonically driven handpiece in response to a change in vacuum pressure within an aspiration line. The system includes a pressure sensor which can sense the vacuum pressure within the aspiration line. The ultrasonically driven handpiece is driven by a power source that is also connected to the pressure sensor. The power source varies the power output of the handpiece in response to changes in the vacuum pressure in a continuous non-step manner.




By way of example, the output power of the handpiece is increased when there is a reduction in the vacuum pressure. The variation in power may be a linear function of the change in vacuum pressure, so that the power continuously increases or decreases with a corresponding reduction or increase in vacuum pressure, respectively. Increasing the power in response to a reduction in line pressure may provide an automatic means for breaking tip occlusions. The continuous power response can provide a technique which has a lower average power than systems in the prior art. The lower power minimizes the amount of heat generated by friction between a cornea and a vibrating tip of the handpiece.




Referring to the drawings more particularly by reference numbers,

FIG. 1

shows an embodiment of an ultrasonic surgical system


10


of the present invention. The system


10


may include an ultrasonically driven handpiece


12


which has a tip


14


that can be inserted into a cornea


16


. The handpiece


12


may include one or more ultrasonic transducers


18


which convert electrical power into mechanical movement of the tip


14


. The handpiece


12


is typically held by a surgeon who performs a surgical procedure with the system


10


. By way of example, the system


10


can be used to perform a phacoemulsification procedure to break and aspirate a lens of the cornea


16


.




The handpiece


14


is coupled to a pump


20


by an aspiration line


22


. The pump


20


creates a vacuum pressure within the aspiration line


22


. The aspiration line


22


is in fluid communication with an inner channel


24


and opening


26


in the tip


14


. The vacuum pressure within the line


22


can aspirate matter from the cornea


16


.




The system


10


may include a power source


28


which provides electrical power to the transducers


18


. The power source


28


may be connected to a pressure sensor


30


that senses the level of the vacuum pressure within the aspiration line


22


. The power source


28


varies the output power of the transducers


18


in response to changes in the vacuum pressure within the line


22


. In general, the power source


28


increases the output power of the transducers


18


when the vacuum pressure falls (eg. becomes more negative) and decreases the output power when the line pressure increases.




The power source


28


may be located within a console


32


that is connected to the sensor


30


and handpiece


12


. The console


32


may have input knobs or buttons


34


which allow the surgeon to vary different parameters of the system


10


. The console


32


may also have a readout display(s)


35


which provides an indication of the vacuum pressure, power level, etc. of the system


10


.





FIG. 2

shows an embodiment of the power source


28


. The power source


28


may include a microprocessor


36


that varies the output power of the transducers


18


in accordance with a software routine(s). The processor


36


can be connected to a memory device(s)


38


which contains instructions and data used to perform the software routine.




The processor


36


may be connected to the pressure sensor


30


which provides a signal that may vary in amplitude with changes in the line pressure. The signal may be converted to a digital bit string(s) by an analog to digital (A/D) converter


40


.




The output of the processor


36


may be connected to a voltage controlled oscillator (VCO)


42


. The output of the VCO


42


may be a time varying analog signal which is amplified by a driver circuit


44


and provided to the transducers


18


. By way of example, the output signal of the VCO


42


may be a series of square wave pulse. The frequency of the VCO output signal may vary with a corresponding change in the amplitude of the VCO input signal from the processor


36


. The processor


36


may have a digital to analog (D/A) converter


46


to convert a digital bit string(s) to an analog VCO input signal. Although a processor


36


is shown and described, it is to be understood that the output of the transducer


18


can be connected directly to the input of the VCO


42


.




The output of the power source


28


may be normally set at a frequency that is greater than the natural resonant frequency of the transducers


18


. The output power of the handpiece


12


can be increased by decreasing the frequency of the output signal provided to the transducers


18


. The lower frequency is closer to the natural frequency of the transducers


18


. The transfer function of the transducers


18


increases as the input frequency approaches the natural frequency. Conversely, the power output of the transducers


18


decreases with an increase in the frequency of the VCO output signal. The variation in frequency may occur while the voltage of the VCO output signal remains at a constant valve.




The software routine performed by the microprocessor


36


can have an upper CEILING power limit and a lower IDLE power limit for the handpiece


12


. The CEILING and IDLE limits can be varied by the surgeon through the input buttons


34


. The IDLE power limit may be a minimum output power of the transducers


18


when there is a zero vacuum pressure within the aspiration line


22


. The CEILING power limit may be a maximum output power of the transducers


18


. The processor


36


may have an automatic scaling function which sets a power scale between the IDLE and CEILING limits based on the value of the CEILING limit set by the surgeon. The scale may be linear so that there is a linear correspondence between the vacuum pressure and the output power of the transducers


18


.




The processor


36


may have a timer function which automatically reduces the CEILING limit to the IDLE limit if the system


10


is in the CEILING mode for a predetermined time interval. The processor


36


may have a counter which counts each time the system enters the CEILING mode. If the timer times out, the processor


36


places the system in the IDLE mode. The timer prevents the system from staying indefinitely in the high powered CEILING mode. The time interval can be set by the surgeon through the input buttons


34


.




The processor


36


may also implement a delay function so that there is a time delay between a variation in the vacuum pressure and the change in the transducer power. The time delay may be implemented as a gradual variation in transducer power over time for each change in vacuum pressure. The time delay may be selectable and variable so that the surgeon can vary a delay slope defined by the change in transducer power versus a variation in the vacuum pressure. The delay function prevents instantaneous feedback which can create an unstable system.




In operation, a surgeon may insert the tip


14


into a cornea


16


to break and aspirate a lens. The vibratory movement of the tip


14


can break the lens into pieces which are then aspirated through the line


22


. An occlusion at the tip opening


26


will lower the pressure within the aspiration line


22


. The lower line pressure is sensed by the sensor


30


and will cause the processor


36


to increase the power output of the transducers


18


. The increase in transducer power may assist in breaking the occlusion.




An occlusion may occur with the line


22


. Such an event may cause the system to enter the CEILING mode. If the occlusion remains in the line


22


for a predetermined time interval the processor


36


may reduce the transducer power to the IDLE mode.





FIG. 3

shows an alternate embodiment of an aspiration system


100


that can automatically control the vacuum pressure within an aspiration line


102


. The apsiration line


102


may be connected to a handpiece


104


. The handpiece


104


may be the same or similar to the device shown in FIG.


1


and described above. The aspiration line


102


may provide a conduit between the handpiece


104


and a pump


106


. The pump


106


may create a vacuum pressure in the line


102


that pulls fluid and debris from the handpiece


104


. By way of example, the pump


106


may be a non-invasive peristaltic pump unit.




The aspiration system


100


may further have a pressure sensor


108


that is coupled to the aspiration line


102


by a sensor line


110


and a one-way check valve


112


. The one-way check valve


112


will allow fluid to flow from the sensor line


110


to the aspiration line


102


, but will not allow fluid to flow from the aspiration line


102


to the sensor line


110


. The oneway check valve


112


essentially seals the pressure sensor


108


from the aspiration line. With such an arrangement the pressure sensor


108


does not have to be sterilized after each surgical procedure.




The system


100


may further have a control valve


114


that can be switched between a closed position and an open position. In the open position the control valve


114


allows a positive pressure fluid to flow into the sensor line


110


. The pressure of the fluid within the sensor line


110


is greater than the vacuum pressure within the aspiration line


102


. The differential pressure between the fluid within the sensor line


110


and the vacuum pressure within the aspiration line


102


opens the check valve


112


. The opened check valve allows the fluid within the sensor line


110


to flow into the aspiration line


102


and increase the vacuum pressure within the line


102


. The control valve


114


can be connected to atmosphere, a tank of fluid, or other source of positive pressure.




The aspiration system


100


may include a control circuit


116


that can switch the control valve


114


and regulate the vacuum pressure within the aspiration line


102


. The control circuit


116


may include a comparator


118


that has a first input


120


which receives a sensor output signal from the pressure sensor


108


and a second input


122


that receives a threshold voltage signal. The comparator


118


has an output


124


that provides a control output signal to the control valve


114


. The control output signal switches the control valve


114


from the closed position to the open position to allow fluid to flow into the aspiration line


102


through the check valve


112


.




The second input


122


of the comparator


118


may be connected to an input device such as a foot pedal


126


. The foot pedal


126


can be depressed by the surgeon to vary the amplitude of the threshold voltage signal. The threshold voltage signal can also be used to control the power of the handpiece


104


. Although a direct connection to the foot pedal


126


is shown and described, it is to be understood that the second input


122


may be connected to a microprocessor. The microprocessor may also provide the function of the comparator


118


and generate the output signal that switches the control valve


114


.




In operation, the surgeon can depress the foot pedal to power the handpiece


104


. Depressing the foot pedal also sets the threshold voltage provided to the comparator


118


. The pressure transducer


108


provides a sensor output signal that corresponds to the pressure within the sensor line


110


. In a steady state condition the pressure within the sensor line


110


is approximately equal to the vacuum pressure within the aspiration line


102


.




An occlusion will cause a reduction in the pressure within the aspiration line


102


. The decrease in pressure within the aspiration line


102


creates a pressure differential that opens the check valve


112


and allows fluid to flow from the sensor line


110


and reduce the pressure in the line


110


. The reduction in the sensor line


110


pressure creates a corresponding variation in the amplitude of the sensor output signal provided to the comparator


118


. When the amplitude of the sensor output signal exceeds the amplitude of the threshold signal from the foot pedal


126


the comparator


124


provides an output signal that opens the control valve


114


.




The opened control valve allows fluid to flow into the sensor


110


line, through the check valve


112


and into the aspiration line


102


to increase the pressure within the line


102


. The instantaneous flow of fluid through the open control valve


114


will increase the pressure within the sensor line


110


and vary the output of the pressure sensor


108


so that it no longer exceeds the threshold voltage. The polarity of the output signal from the comparator


118


reverses and closes the control valve


114


. The pressure within the sensor line


110


drops until the comparator again provides an output signal that opens the control valve


114


. This cycle is repeated until the steady state output signal of the pressure sensor no longer exceeds the threshold voltage. The control circuit


116


may include a timer circuit


128


that opens the control valve


114


and resets the system to the initial condition if the comparator


118


does not provide an valve open output signal for a predetermined time interval.




The threshold signal may have a preset value that defines a preset vacuum pressure. The surgeon can vary vacuum pressure of the aspiration line


102


by manipulating the foot pedal


126


and varying the amplitude of the threshold signal provided to the comparator


118


. The system can be configured to operate in a “vacuum up” mode or a “vacuum down” mode. In the vacuum down mode depressing the foot pedal


126


will increase the power to the handpiece


104


and lower the pressure within the aspiration line


102


. In the vacuum up mode depressing the foot pedal will increase the power to the handpiece


104


and increase the pressure within the line


102


. The vacuum up mode can be enabled by inverting the threshold signal provided to the comparator


118


. The modes can be switched through a switch or button (not shown).




The present invention provides a system that allows a surgeon to control the power to the handpiece and the vacuum pressure of the aspiration system through a single foot pedal


126


. This reduces the complexity of operating the system. Additionally, the check valve


112


essentially seals the pressure sensor


108


so that the sensor


108


does not have to be sterilized after each procedure.




While certain exemplary embodiments have been described and shown in the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that such embodiments are merely illustrative of and not restrictive on the broad invention, and that this invention not be limited to the specific constructions and arrangements shown and described, since various other modifications may occur to those ordinarily skilled in the art.



Claims
  • 1. An aspiration system for a medical device, comprising:an aspiration line that has a vacuum pressure; a pressure sensor that senses the vacuum pressure; a sensor line that provides fluid communication between said pressure sensor and said aspiration line; a one-way check valve that is connected to said sensor line and located between said pressure sensor and said aspiration line, said one-way check valve allows fluid flow from said sensor line to said aspiration line and prevents fluid flow from said aspiration line to said sensor line; a control valve that provides a flow of fluid into said sensor line; and, a control circuit that is connected to said pressure sensor and controls said control valve.
  • 2. The aspiration system as recited in claim 1, wherein said control circuit includes a comparator that has a first input which receives a sensor output signal, a second input which receives a threshold signal and an output that provides a control output signal to said control valve.
  • 3. The aspiration system as recited in claim 2, wherein said second input is coupled to a foot pedal.
  • 4. The aspiration system as recited in claim 3, wherein said threshold signal provided to said second input increases when said foot pedal is depressed.
  • 5. The aspiration system as recited in claim 3, wherein said threshold signal provided to said second input decreases when said foot pedal is depressed.
  • 6. The aspiration system as recited in claim 2, wherein said control circuit includes a timer circuit that is connected to said comparator and said control valve to open said control valve when said comparator does not provide said control output signal for a predetermined time interval.
  • 7. A medical system, comprising;a handpiece; a foot pedal that can be depressed to generate and vary a threshold signal that controls a power of said handpiece; an aspiration line that has a vacuum pressure; a pressure sensor that senses the vacuum pressure and generates a sensor output signal; a control valve that can control the vacuum pressure within said aspiration line; and, a control circuit that compares said threshold signal with said sensor output signal and generates a control output signal to control said control valve.
  • 8. The medical system as recited in claim 7, wherein said control circuit includes a comparator that has a first input that receives said pressure output signal, a second input that receives said threshold signal and an output that provides said control output signal.
  • 9. The medical system as recited in claim 7, wherein said control circuit inverts said threshold signal.
  • 10. The medical system as recited in claim 7, wherein said control circuit includes a timer circuit that is connected to said comparator and said control valve to open said control valve when said comparator does not provide said control output signal for a predetermined time interval.
  • 11. The medical system as recited in claim 7, wherein said threshold signal increases when said foot pedal is depressed.
  • 12. The medical system as recited in claim 7, wherein said threshold signal decreases when said foot pedal is depressed.
  • 13. A method for controlling a vacuum pressure of an irrigation system used in conjunction with a handpiece, comprising:depressing a foot pedal to generate and vary a threshold signal to control a power of a handpiece; generating a sensor output signal that corresponds to a vacuum pressure of an aspiration line; comparing said threshold signal with said sensor output signal; and, generating a control output signal to open a control valve that allows fluid to flow into said aspiration line when said sensor output signal exceeds said threshold signal.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, opening said control valve when said control output signal is not generated within a predetermined time interval.
  • 15. A method for controlling a medial aspiration system, comprising:sensing a pressure of an aspiration line through a sensor line that is coupled to the aspiration line by a one-way check valve; opening a control valve to allow fluid to flow from a positive pressure source to the sensor line, and from the sensor line to the aspiration line through the one-way check valve, the one-way check valve closing when a pressure within the aspiration line is essentially equal to a pressure within the sensor line.
  • 16. The method as recited in claim 15, further comprising comparing a sensor output signal that corresponds to the aspiration line pressure with a threshold signal, and opening the control valve when the sensor output signal exceeds the threshold signal.
  • 17. The method as recited in claim 16, further comprising depressing a foot pedal to vary the threshold signal.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/097,099, Jun. 16, 1998, now abandoned. This application claims benefit of Provisional Application 60/084,852 filed May 8, 1998.

US Referenced Citations (67)
Number Name Date Kind
1206126 Mitsch Nov 1916 A
3301063 Kisling III, et al. Jan 1967 A
3476144 Krantz Nov 1969 A
3501959 Womack Mar 1970 A
3661144 Jensen et al. May 1972 A
3784039 Marco Jan 1974 A
3812855 Banko May 1974 A
3863504 Borsanyi Feb 1975 A
4016882 Broadwin et al. Apr 1977 A
4226124 Kersten Oct 1980 A
4382442 Jones May 1983 A
4425115 Wuchinich Jan 1984 A
4457455 Meshberg Jul 1984 A
4465470 Kelman Aug 1984 A
4468217 Kuzmick et al. Aug 1984 A
4526593 Meyerson Jul 1985 A
4650461 Woods Mar 1987 A
4722350 Armeniades et al. Feb 1988 A
4770654 Rogers et al. Sep 1988 A
4808154 Freeman Feb 1989 A
4832685 Haines May 1989 A
4838853 Parisi Jun 1989 A
4935005 Haines Jun 1990 A
4983160 Steppe et al. Jan 1991 A
5111971 Winer May 1992 A
5123903 Quaid et al. Jun 1992 A
5152746 Atkinson et al. Oct 1992 A
5167725 Clark et al. Dec 1992 A
5188102 Idemoto et al. Feb 1993 A
5197485 Grooters Mar 1993 A
5282786 Ureche Feb 1994 A
5312329 Beaty et al. May 1994 A
5324297 Hood et al. Jun 1994 A
5324299 Davison et al. Jun 1994 A
5342380 Hood Aug 1994 A
5354265 Mackool Oct 1994 A
5354268 Peterson et al. Oct 1994 A
5380274 Nita Jan 1995 A
5391144 Sakurai et al. Feb 1995 A
5413578 Zahedi May 1995 A
5454784 Atkinson et al. Oct 1995 A
5464389 Stahl Nov 1995 A
5520652 Peterson May 1996 A
5582588 Sakurai et al. Dec 1996 A
5591127 Barwick, Jr. et al. Jan 1997 A
5628743 Cimino May 1997 A
5630939 Bulard et al. May 1997 A
5676650 Grieshaber et al. Oct 1997 A
5685840 Schechter et al. Nov 1997 A
5700240 Barwick, Jr. et al. Dec 1997 A
5722945 Anis et al. Mar 1998 A
5730156 Mackool Mar 1998 A
5733256 Costin Mar 1998 A
5743871 Strukel et al. Apr 1998 A
5746719 Farra et al. May 1998 A
5766146 Barwick, Jr. Jun 1998 A
5807310 Hood Sep 1998 A
5810765 Oda Sep 1998 A
5817099 Skolik et al. Oct 1998 A
5843021 Edwards et al. Dec 1998 A
5890516 Talamonti Apr 1999 A
5897569 Kellogg et al. Apr 1999 A
6083193 Kadziauskas et al. Jul 2000 A
6110259 Shultz et al. Aug 2000 A
6179803 Edwards et al. Jan 2001 B1
6193683 Ludin et al. Feb 2001 B1
6203540 Weber Mar 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (7)
Number Date Country
0 251 694 Jul 1988 EP
0 251 694 Jul 1988 EP
0 284 322 Sep 1988 EP
0 284 322 Sep 1988 EP
0 284 322 Feb 1993 EP
0 931 519 Jul 1999 EP
WO 8810102 Dec 1988 WO
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/084852 May 1998 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/097099 Jun 1998 US
Child 09/372476 US