Patent Grant
10378339
This disclosure relates to controlling drilling and other wellbore operations.
Wellbores can be drilled into geologic formations for a variety of reasons, such as, for example, hydrocarbon production, fluid injection, or water production. During wellbore drilling, a variety of tasks may need to be performed, each requiring different tools to be sent downhole. The term workover refers to any kind of wellbore intervention that necessitates, for example, the expensive process of removing and replacing a drill string, an operation that requires considerable time and expense.
The technology relates to a downhole wellbore communication tool that provides wireless communication between downhole well operation tools and the surface. The technology can be used for downhole equipment (for example, drilling, completion, and workover equipment) that can be accessed by Wi-Fi communication. The tool passes information from downhole well operation tools to the surface and passes signals and commands to the downhole well operation tools. The communication tool is compact and can be mounted, for example, to a bottom hole assembly or drill string.
Some communication tools include a master control unit and a second (or auxiliary) control unit. The master control unit includes a processor with a transmitter and a receiver, and is coupled to a memory device. The second control unit also includes a processor with a transmitter and a receiver, and is coupled to a memory device. The processors of both units are powered by a stand-alone power source, for example, a lithium battery. In addition to receiving and transmitting data between the downhole well operation tools and the surface, each processor can deliver a full diagnostic of the well tools in real time and can identify points of failure.
In one aspect, wellbore communication systems include: a control sub-assembly including: a first control unit including a first processor, a first transmitter, a first receiver and a first memory, the first control unit operable to send and receive wireless signals from the surface; a second control unit including a second processor, a second transmitter, a second receiver and a second memory, the second control unit operable to send and receive wireless signals from the first control unit; and one or more downhole sub-assemblies interchangeably mounted on and carried by a bottom hole assembly, each of the one or more downhole sub-assembly configured to wirelessly send and receive signals from the second control unit. The first control unit is configured to organize information received from the one or more downhole sub-assemblies, organize the information in a standard telemetry sequence, and send it to the surface.
In one aspect, methods of controlling wellbore operations include: receiving, by a first control unit deployed within a wellbore and from a surface of the wellbore, instructions to perform operations within the wellbore; transmitting, by the first control assembly, at least a portion of the instructions to a second control unit downhole of the first control unit; receiving, by the second control unit, instructions to perform operations within the wellbore; selecting, by the second control unit, to which of a plurality of downhole tools a signal should be sent; transmitting, by the second control assembly, at least a portion of the instructions to at least one of the plurality of downhole tools.
Systems and methods can include one or more of the following features.
In some embodiments, the second control unit is configured to receive a signal from the first control unit and determine to which of the plurality of downhole sub-assemblies to send a signal.
In some embodiments, the first control unit includes: one or more processors; and a computer-readable medium storing instructions executable by the one or more processors to perform operations including: receiving, from a surface of the wellbore, instructions to perform operations within the wellbore; and transmitting, to at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies, at least a portion of the instructions. In some cases, the operations further include: receiving, from at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies, status signals representing a status of the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies; and transmitting, to the surface of the wellbore, the status signals. The status signals can include a state of a sub-assembly, the state including either an on state or an off state. The system can further include: one or more transmitters at the surface of the wellbore, the one or more transmitters configured to transmit the instructions to the one or more processors; and one or more receivers at the surface of the wellbore, the one or more receivers configured to receive the status signals from the one or more processors.
In one embodiment, the system includes one or more repeaters configured to be positioned between the surface and the bottom hole assembly within the wellbore, the one or more repeaters configured to boost a strength of a wireless signal between the one or more transmitters or the one or more receivers and the one or more processors.
In some embodiments, the first control unit further includes a power source configured to provide operating power to the one or more processors.
In some embodiments, the control sub-assembly is a first control sub-assembly and the system further includes a second control sub-assembly including a first control unit and a second control unit.
Some methods include: transmitting, by the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies to the second control assembly, status signals representing a status of the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies; and receiving, by the first control assembly, the status signals from the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies. In some cases, methods include transmitting, by the first control assembly to the surface of the wellbore, the status signals from the at least one of the plurality of sub-assemblies.
Advantages of the system include the ability to communicate information between the surface and downhole wirelessly, without mud pulse telemetry. In addition, this technology can keep full communication while drilling depleted reservoir zones or fracture zones that induce large fluid losses to the formation. Such losses affect the quality of mud pulse signals but do not affect the described systems that use WI-Fi communication. Loss of fluid to the formation can also cause plugging of the formation by the lost circulation material. By avoiding weak signal and plugging issues, these systems and methods also can reduce the rig/well time spent for communicating with downhole devices during drilling operations. In addition, these wireless systems free drilling engineers to place downhole drilling tools in different places by reducing limitations regarding downhole drilling equipment position.
These systems and methods can improve the drilling process performance and enhances safety in oil and gas wells having hydrogen sulfide concentrations. The use of Wi-Fi communication avoids the need for a sensor in contact with drilling and/or completion fluid. For example, an associated sensor can be attached to the standpipe that the drilling and/or completion mud goes through. This approach limits the exposure of personnel to fluids that maybe contaminated with hydrogen sulfide.
The details of one or more embodiments of the systems and methods are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.
The technology relates to a downhole wellbore communication tool that provides wireless communication between downhole well operation tools and the surface. The tool passes wellbore information from downhole well operation tools to the surface and passes signals and commands to the downhole well operation tools. The communication tool is compact and can be mounted to various parts of a bottom hole assembly or drill string.
Some communication tools include a master control unit and a second (or auxiliary) control unit. The master control unit includes a processor with a transmitter and a receiver, and is coupled to a memory device. The second control unit also includes a processor with a transmitter and a receiver, and is coupled to a memory device. The processors of both units are powered by a stand-alone power source or sources, for example, a lithium battery. In addition to receiving and transmitting data between the downhole well operation tools and the surface, each processor can deliver a diagnostic of the well tools in real time and can identify points of failure.
The system has two control units, each including a processor, a transmitter, a receiver, and a memory. The uphole or master control unit is wirelessly coupled to surface computers. The downhole or secondary control unit is wirelessly coupled to various downhole tools. The two control units are coupled to each other and are powered using a battery or batteries. The secondary control unit receives well information from the downhole tools and transmits information to the master control unit. The master control unit organizes the information in a standard telemetry sequence, and in turn sends the information to the surface.
The BHA 102 also includes a control assembly 101 mounted on and carried by the BHA 102. The control assembly 101 is designed to be deployed in the wellbore 106 and is configured to handle shock-loads, other vibrations, high temperatures, hydrogen sulfide, corrosive chemicals, or other potential downhole hazards. The control assembly 101 communicates with multiple downhole well operation tools 103, 105 that are mounted on the BRA 102. The tools can be located above or below the control sub.
The wellbore drilling system 100 includes one or more transmitters 112 at or near the surface 116. The one or more transmitters 112 are operable to transmit communications such as, for example, operation instructions to the control assembly 101. In addition to the transmitters 112, one or more receivers 113 are positioned at or near the surface 116. The one or more receivers 113 are operable to receive one or more status signals from the control assembly 101. The transmitter(s) 112 and the receiver(s) 113 communicate wirelessly with the control assembly 101. In some implementations, the wireless communication include radio frequency communication, such as Wi-Fi. In some implementations, the transmitters and receivers are located near (for example, above or below) the surface of the ground as stand-alone units or mounted on other components of the drilling system.
The wellbore drilling system 100 includes repeaters 114 positioned between the surface 116 and the BHA 102 within the wellbore 106. The repeaters 114 can boost a strength of a wireless signal between the one or more transmitters 112 or the one or more receivers 113 and the control assembly 101. Some wellbore drilling systems are implemented without repeaters 114.
The master control unit 220A is operable to coordinate information transfer with the surface and to receive and delivery desired information to the secondary control unit 220B. The secondary control unit 220B is operable to coordinate information transfer with downhole equipment. The communication tool 200 is configured with wired communication between the master control unit 220A and the secondary control unit 220B. In some tools, the master control unit 220A and the secondary control unit 220B communicate with each other wirelessly instead of or in addition to such wired communication channels.
The master control unit 220A includes one or more processors 306A and a computer-readable medium 318A storing instructions executable by the one or more processors 306A to perform operations. The master control unit 220A also includes a transmitter 302A and receiver 304A operable to communicate with the surface 116. For example, after receiving instructions to perform operations within the wellbore, the master control unit can process and organize the instructions before relaying the instructions to the secondary control unit 220B. This processing and organizing can include identifying which tool will receive the desired information when the information is sent in a pre-setting sequence for different tools. This approach accounts for each tool having different function in the drill string and needing different configurations or modifications. The master control unit 220A also receives signals representing a status of the downhole tools, 340, 342, 344 from the secondary control unit 220B. The transmitter 302A can transmit the status signals to the surface 116. The processors 306A of the master control unit 220A organize information being transferred to the surface in a standard telemetry sequence in organized packages to be interpreted by field personnel. The status signals can include a state of the downhole tools such as, for example, an “on” state or an “off” state and the operational status of each tool such as, for example, leaks, temperature, and functionality.
Communication tools also include a power source or sources. The communication tool 200 has a single power source 222. The power source 222 is operatively coupled to and provides operating power to the master control unit 220A and the secondary control unit 220B. In some implementations, communication tools include multiple power sources (for example, each control unit powered by a separate battery). In some implementations, the power source is a lithium ion battery.
The secondary control unit 220B includes one or more processors 306B and a computer-readable medium 318B storing instructions executable by the one or more processors 306B to perform operations. The secondary control unit 220B also includes a transmitter 302B and receiver 304B operable to communicate with downhole equipment such as downhole tools 340, 342, 344. After receiving information from the master control unit 220A, the secondary control unit 220B determines to which of the plurality of downhole tools the signal should be sent. For example, the secondary control unit 220B determines for which of the downhole tools 340, 342, 344 the information is intended before relaying the instructions. After receive the information, the control sub can submit the desired command to different tools located across the drill string. The signal switch a specific tool between on and off states as well as sending different information for different tools at the same time.
The receiver 304B receives status signals representing a status of the downhole tools 340, 342, 344. The secondary control unit 220B can also transmit the status signals to the surface 116 via the master control unit 220A. The status signals can include a state of a communication assembly (such as an “on” state or an “off” state).
The communication tool 200 send signals to downhole tools 340, 342, 344. Each tool 340, 342, 344 has a respective receiver 304C, 304D, 304E that can be used to receive instructions from the second control unit transmitter 302B. Those instructions may be to perform operations within the wellbore. Each tool has a respective transmitter 302C, 302D, 302E that can transmit status signals representing a status of the respective downhole tool to the receiver 304B of the secondary control unit 220B. The secondary control unit 220B communicates the status signals to the surface 116 via the master control unit 220A. The status signals can include a state of each downhole tool (such as an “on” state or an “off” state).
In the case where a downhole tool 340, 342, 344 cannot communicate with the surface (for example, failure of the one or more processors 306A), communication is interrupted between the surface 116 and downhole drilling tools. However, if processor 306B is still functioning, it continues collecting and storing the information on computer-readable medium 318B. That stored information is processed when the communication tool 200 arrives at the surface 116, at which time the computer-readable medium 318B memory is downloaded to a surface computer and interpreted. The processor can be set to automatically collect and save data. For example, all communications and data received from tools can be saved in the memory in a sequence that they arrive.
In some embodiments, the method includes automatically maintaining the system functions based on pre-determined limits work. This functionality can be provided, for example, by pre-calibrating equipment on the surface to deliver certain limits or results. For example, MWD, LWD, and clean out tools can be pre-programmed with a maximum size to which the arms of a stabilizer are opened when the tool receives a signal to activate the stabilizer.
The hydraulic power unit 401 can receive at least a portion of the instructions from the secondary control unit 220B. Portions of the instructions can include changing states of a hydraulic power unit 401 to change position of the actuatable slips 408, or any other command that can be executed by the hydraulic power unit. The tool 340 receives such a signal to activate at its receiver 302C, to change its state to the activated mode (in
At 604, at least a portion of the wellbore instructions is transmitted by the control assembly to the second control assembly. The second control assembly analyzes and identifies which downhole tool to activate and sends the signal to the respective tool, step 606.
At 608, a respective tool element is activated within the wellbore. Each tool can be activated independently. Additionally, status signals representing a status of the at least one of the tools is transmitted by to the control assembly and then the control assembly. The status signals from the at least one of downhole assemblies is received at the surface.
The described systems can communicate with multiple tools at the same time. The number of tools will be limited due the capacity of the processor and memory. In some approaches, methods include identifying data needs for particular tools and choosing tools based on the capacity of the processor and memory. Similarly, the available downhole time for battery-powered systems can be limited by available power. For these systems, methods can include monitoring battery status of the control sub and controlling transmissions and other activity of the control sub based on battery state and the number of tools being controlled. In addition, methods can include setting the control sub to power on after a certain time, without need to send a command from the surface after being deployed in an inactive state.
While this specification contains many specific implementation details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular implementations of particular systems or methods. Certain features that are described in this specification in the context of separate implementations can also be implemented in combination in a single implementation. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single implementation can also be implemented in multiple implementations separately or in any suitable sub combination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub combination or variation of a sub combination.
Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirable results. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various system components in the implementations described above should not be understood as requiring such separation in all implementations, and it should be understood that the described program components and systems can generally be integrated together in a single software product or packaged into multiple software products.
Thus, particular implementations of the subject matter have been described. Other implementations are within the scope of the following claims. In some cases, the actions recited in the claims can be performed in a different order and still achieve desirable results. In addition, the processes depicted in the accompanying figures do not necessarily require the particular order shown, or sequential order, to achieve desirable results. In certain implementations, multitasking and parallel processing may be advantageous.
A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, although the system is described as being wireless, it can include wired communication between at least parts of the system. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1812044 | Grant | Jun 1931 | A |
| 3335801 | Wilsey | Aug 1967 | A |
| 3557875 | Solum et al. | Jan 1971 | A |
| 4058163 | Yandell | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4384625 | Roper et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4399873 | Lindsey, Jr. | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4458761 | Van Vreeswyk | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4482014 | Allwin et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4646842 | Arnold et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4674569 | Revils et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4681159 | Allwin et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4693328 | Furse et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4852654 | Buckner | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4855820 | Barbour | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4944348 | Whiteley et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4993493 | Arnold | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5152342 | Rankin et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5390742 | Dines et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5947213 | Angle | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6009948 | Flanders et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| RE36556 | Smith | Feb 2000 | E |
| 6152221 | Carmicheal et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6163257 | Tracy | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6234250 | Green et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6378628 | McGuire et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6527066 | Rives | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6550534 | Brett | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6577244 | Clark et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6662110 | Bargach et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6684953 | Sonnier | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6691779 | Sezginer et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6739398 | Yokley et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6752216 | Coon | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6873267 | Tubel et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
| 6899178 | Tubel | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6938698 | Coronado | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 7219730 | Tilton et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7228902 | Oppelt | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7243735 | Koederitz et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7252152 | LoGiudice et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7278492 | Braddick | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7419001 | Broussard | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7581440 | Meek | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7654334 | Manson | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7665537 | Patel et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7677303 | Coronado | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7938192 | Rytlewski | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7940302 | Mehrotra et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8028767 | Radford et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8102238 | Golander et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
| 8191635 | Buske et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
| 8237585 | Zimmerman | Aug 2012 | B2 |
| 8334775 | Tapp et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
| 8424605 | Schultz et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
| 8448724 | Buske et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 8469084 | Clark et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
| 8528668 | Rasheed | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8540035 | Xu et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
| 8750513 | Renkis | Jun 2014 | B2 |
| 8789585 | Leising et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
| 8800655 | Bailey | Aug 2014 | B1 |
| 8833472 | Hay | Sep 2014 | B2 |
| 8919431 | Lott | Dec 2014 | B2 |
| 8925213 | Sallwasser | Jan 2015 | B2 |
| 8991489 | Redlinger et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
| 9051792 | Herberg et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9091148 | Moffitt et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
| 9121255 | Themig et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9140100 | Daccord et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 9157294 | Kleppa et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
| 9187959 | Treviranus et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9208676 | Fadell et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
| 9341027 | Radford et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
| 9494003 | Carr | Nov 2016 | B1 |
| 9506318 | Brunet | Nov 2016 | B1 |
| 9546536 | Schultz et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
| 20020148607 | Pabst | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030001753 | Cernocky et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20040060741 | Shipalesky et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040156264 | Gardner et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20050273302 | Huang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060081375 | Ruttley | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060086497 | Ohmer et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060107061 | Holovacs | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060260799 | Broussard | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060290528 | MacPherson et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070057811 | Mehta | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070107911 | Miller et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070187112 | Eddison et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070261855 | Brunet | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20080041631 | Vail, III | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080115574 | Meek | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20090045974 | Patel | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090050333 | Smith | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090114448 | Laird et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090223670 | Snider | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090289808 | Prammer | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20100097205 | Script | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100101786 | Lovell et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100212891 | Stewart et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100212900 | Eddison et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100212901 | Buytaert | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100258298 | Lynde et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100282511 | Maranuk et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110067884 | Burleson et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110073329 | Clemens et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
| 20110100645 | Yapici | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110127044 | Radford et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110147014 | Chen et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110240302 | Coludrovich, III | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110266004 | Hallundbaek et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20120085540 | Heijnen | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20120175135 | Dyer et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
| 20120241154 | Zhou | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120247767 | Themig et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20120307051 | Welter | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20120312560 | Bahr et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
| 20130128697 | Contant | May 2013 | A1 |
| 20130153245 | Knobloch et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130186645 | Hall | Jul 2013 | A1 |
| 20140060844 | Barbour et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140083769 | Moriarty et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140090898 | Moriarty et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
| 20140126330 | Shampine et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140139681 | Jones, Jr. et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
| 20140166367 | Campbell et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140172306 | Brannigan | Jun 2014 | A1 |
| 20140208847 | Baranov | Jul 2014 | A1 |
| 20150027706 | Symms | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150090459 | Cain et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| 20150152713 | Garcia et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150176362 | Prieto et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150267500 | Van Dongen et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
| 20150308203 | Lewis | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160160578 | Lee | Jun 2016 | A1 |
| 20160215612 | Morrow | Jul 2016 | A1 |
| 20160230508 | Jensen | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160237764 | Jellison et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160237768 | Jamison et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
| 20160356152 | Croux | Dec 2016 | A1 |
| 20170074071 | Tzallas et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
| 20180030810 | Saldanha | Feb 2018 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 204177988 | Feb 2015 | CN |
| 377234 | Oct 1989 | EP |
| 618345 | Oct 1994 | EP |
| 2157278 | Feb 2010 | EP |
| 2692982 | May 2014 | EP |
| 2835493 | Feb 2015 | EP |
| 2157743 | Oct 1985 | GB |
| 2261238 | Dec 1993 | GB |
| 2460096 | Nov 2009 | GB |
| 2470762 | Dec 2010 | GB |
| 2003058545 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| 2011038170 | Mar 2011 | WO |
| 2011095600 | Aug 2011 | WO |
| 2011159890 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| 2016144345 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2018/059167 dated Feb. 19, 2019, 14 pages. |
| Offshore, “Completions Technology: Large monobore completions prevent high-volume gas well flow restrictions”, Dec. 1, 2001, retrieved from the internet: ⋅ http://www.offshore-mag.com/articles/print/volume-61/issue-12/news/completions-technology-large-monobore-completions-prevent-high-volume-gas-well-flow-restrictions.html, 9 pages. |
| Engineers Edge—ACME Stub Threads Size Designation Table Chart, retrieved from the internet at: http://www.engineersedge.com/hardware/acme-stub-thread.htm, retrieved Feb. 27, 2017, 2 pages. |
| Engineering Innovation Worldwide, TIW XPAK Liner Hanger System brochure, 2015 TIW Corporation, Houston TX , TIW0001D Jun. 2015, retrieved form the internet at: http://www.tiwoiltools.com/Images/Interior/downloads/tiw_xpak_brochure.pdf, 4 pages. |
| Mi Swaco: A Schlumberger Company, “Intelligent Fluids Monitoring System,” available on or before Mar. 11, 2015, [retrieved May 1, 2018] retrieved from URL: <https://www.slb.com/resources/other_resources/brochures/miswaco/intelligent_fluids_monitoring_brochure.aspx>, 8 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190136688 A1 | May 2019 | US |
