The present invention is in the field of handling and treating animal wastes. In particular, the invention relates to processing manure into animal bedding material, soil amendments or conditioners. The field also includes processing equipment and systems for processing manure into products having commercial value.
Over the years, there has been a variety of approaches to treating and disposing of livestock manure as well as mediating disagreeable odor generated from livestock manure. The increased scrutiny is due in part to or as a result of a well-known recent trend toward higher concentrations of livestock. As a result, land, water and other natural resources must be better utilized to accommodate and sustain higher concentrations of livestock.
In 2003, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimated that there were 1.3 million farms in the U.S. maintaining livestock. About 238,000 of these farms were considered to be Animal Feeding Operations (AFOs). AFOs produce more than 500 million tons of animal manure that, when improperly managed, poses substantial risks to the environment and public health. More recently, however, problems associated with livestock manure have become more challenging due to increased environmental and other regulatory scrutiny.
Also in 2003, the EPA issued final rules revising and clarifying regulatory requirements for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) pursuant to the Clean Water Act. (33 USC § 1251(a))(40 CFR Parts 9, 122, 123 and 412). These rules seek to ensure that CAFO's act to manage manure more effectively and protect the nation's water quality. At present, the EPA estimates that there are 15,500 CAFOs managing 300 million tons of manure produced annually. CAFOs often have insufficient land to effectively use the manure as fertilizer. That trend coincides with increased reports of large-scale discharges from CAFOs as well as continued nutrient runoff impairing U.S. water bodies. Interestingly, the EPA also estimates that confined farm animals generate 3 times more raw waste than is generated by humans in the U.S.
The EPA's new regulatory program covering the large CAFO operations (which present the greatest potential risk to water quality) is consistent with the Unified National Strategy for Animal Feeding Operations jointly developed by the EPA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The strategy defines a national objective for all AFOs to develop a comprehensive nutrient management plan to minimize impact on water quality and public health.
Despite improvements in water quality since passage of the Clean Water Act, nearly 40% of the Nation's assessed waters remain impaired. The EPA has determined that manure from CAFO's is a significant contributor to the remaining water quality problems. Put simply, improperly managed manure has caused serious chronic and acute water quality problems throughout the U.S.
The new rules strengthen the existing regulatory program relating to CAFO's by establishing a mandatory duty to apply for a permit pursuant to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)(42 CFR § 122) and the Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards (ELGs) for CAFOs (42 CFR § 412). To obtain the NPDES permit, the CAFO must develop and implement a nutrient management plan in compliance with effluent guidelines that set forth performance expectations for existing and new sources. The performance expectations address appropriate manure storage and proper land application practices for CAFOs. The management plan also identifies site-specific actions to be taken by the CAFO to ensure proper and effective manure and wastewater management.
In the past, livestock manure has been treated by anaerobically digesting raw livestock manure. In this process, a mixed culture of bacteria mediates the degradation of the putrescible fraction of organic matter ultimately to methane, carbon dioxide and mineralized nutrients. However, volatile intermediate compounds are also produced that have a foul odor. Another known method uses a fixed film digester design for anaerobic digestion of flushed livestock manure, whereby a biofilm allows effective treatment of wastewater at ambient and elevated temperatures as well as at reasonable hydraulic retention times.
Other systems combust animal waste to avoid releasing objectionable odor and produce dry ash that can be used as fertilizer. Another known system extracts heat energy from manure and other wet waste by combusting waste that had been dried, whereby the waste material is combusted to ash. Yet another known system makes fuel from livestock, industrial and agricultural waste and other biomass wastes, whereby the waste materials are blended and formed into fuel pellets without the need for mechanical or drying processes.
Others have designed processes for sterilizing, dewatering and micronizing organic and biomass waste streams to produce liquid or granular fertilizer, and similar systems for drying, deodorizing, sterilizing and pulverizing animal waste and manure to produce fertilizer. Still other systems compress (i.e., dewatering) and/or bio-digest various biomasses, manure and various sludge or slurries, whereby opposing rollers and a friction-inducing differential are used to produce organic fertilizer or soil conditioner.
Another known system makes organic fertilizer pellets from raw manure using cyclones that generate high-velocity air streams to pulverize and dry the raw manure. Another known system recycles organic household and restaurant waste to produce a pro-ferment, whereby the pro-ferment is mixed with animal waste to compost fermentation. Another known system manufactures artificial soil, soil conditioner, peat substitute or hygienic bedding material for livestock from animal excrement whereby the manure is deodorized, sterilized and rendered porous by subjecting the manure to an alternating current in a reactor.
It is well known in the art that livestock manure is problematic. For example, odor generated by large concentrations of manure is offensive and noxious. Disposal of livestock manure is also problematic for environmental safety reasons such as: erosion control, manure storage, runoff control, nutrient management, water/wetland protection, land runoff pollution, phosphorous and nitrogen emission reduction, and EPA regulations concerning CAFOs. Thus, it is highly advantageous to treat livestock manure in such a way as to avoid or minimize emitting odor and to avoid significant disposal. Prior attempts have been made to dry and combust manure. However, there remains a need to convert animal manure into useful end-products in new and more effective ways.
One aspect of the invention is a system for processing manure. The system includes a hopper adapted to blend and meter a manure feedstock to a dryer having a cyclone adapted to vent exhaust and discharge dried manure solids. The system may also include a wet scrubber and/or an oxidation trench each adapted to remove particulate from the exhaust. The system may further include one or more lagoons each adapted to receive waste water from the scrubber and/or exhaust from the cyclone. The system still further includes a furnace adapted to provide heat to the dryer.
In the present system, the manure feedstock may be metered by the hopper to the dryer at a steady state. The system may still further include a screen press adapted to reduce the moisture content of wet manure producing a pressed wet manure product. The manure feedstock may include the pressed wet manure product and a biomass, wherein the biomass is dried manure, sawdust, ground bean straw, ground corn stover, peat moss, paper mill sludge, ground switch grass or the like or mixtures thereof. The manure feedstock may also include some wet manure. The dryer may be a rotary drum, a fluidized bed, a steam tube or a flash dryer.
Another aspect of the invention includes a process for converting a manure feedstock into suitable livestock bedding product or suitable soil amendment/conditioner. The process includes providing a manure feedstock having a water content and drying the manure feedstock generating suitable livestock bedding product or suitable soil amendment/conditioner and an exhaust. The manure feedstock may be dried at a temperature in the range of 600-900° F. The process may also include scrubbing the dryer/cyclone exhaust to remove particulate matter generating a clean exhaust and warm waste water. The process may still further include heating and aerating one or more lagoons and/or one or more trenches (each adapted to digest wet manure) with the warm waste water and with the particulate-containing and/or clean exhausts.
The process may also include screen pressing a wet manure producing a pressed wet manure product, wherein the water content of the wet manure is about 80-85%, and wherein the water content of the pressed wet manure product is around 70-72%. The livestock bedding or soil amendment/conditioner end-products may have a moisture content of about 5%.
The process may also include blending a biomass with the wet manure and/or the pressed wet manure product, wherein the biomass is dried manure, sawdust, ground bean straw, ground corn stover, peat moss, paper mill sludge, ground switch grass or the like or mixtures thereof. Still further, the process may include burning dried manure and/or biomass to provide heat to the dryer.
These and other individual features and advantages of the invention are described in or apparent from the following detailed description. The features and advantages may be separately incorporated in various exemplary embodiments of systems and methods set forth herein.
An exemplary embodiment of the present invention is shown in
The wet manure 19 may have a water content over 80%. The wet press 18 reduces the water content of the wet manure 19 to around 70-72%. The pressed solids 10 are transferred from the wet press 18 to a metering hopper 16. For example, the pressed solids 10 may be conveyed by a wheeled loader, screw conveyor or a belt conveyor. There, the pressed solids 10 can be blended with a biomass 12 such as sawdust, ground bean straw, corn fodder, ground corn stover, peat moss, paper mill sludge, ground switch grass, straw or the like or mixtures thereof to produce a manure feedstock.
The pressed solids 10 and/or biomass 12 may be further blended with a stream of dried manure 40 in the metering hopper 16 to produce another manure feedstock. Vertical storage bins may be used to store the biomass 12 and/or the dried manure end-products 36, 38, 40. Wet manure 19 may be pre-blended with dried manure 40 prior to being fed into the metering hopper 16 whereby the pre-blended wet/dry manure 14 may also be stored in vertical storage bins. Wet manure 19 having a moisture content below around 50% can be transferred directly to the dryer 22. Alternatively, wet manure 19 may be fed directly to the metering hopper 16 where the water content of the wet manure 19 is less than about 72%.
The dried manure end-products 36,38,40 may have a water content of around 5-40% The biomass 12 may have a water content of around 20% to 50%. The wet manure and dried manure blend 14 may have a water content of around 30% to 60%. In an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the pressed solids 10 are blended with biomass 12 and wet/dried manure 14 such that the moisture content of the material in the wet product metering hopper is around 30% to 50%. The raw material metering hopper 16 may be used to blend and contain the pressed solids 10, the biomass 12 and the wet/dried manure blend 14. The hopper 16 may include a speed-actuated motor and auger or belt conveyor to convey the material contained therein to the dryer 22. It is important to control and adjust the water content of the material in the hopper 16 in order to achieve efficient operation of the burner 20 and dryer 22. An exemplary furnace is the Energy Unlimited model 15RI5 Biomass furnace. An exemplary metering hopper is the Kuhn Knight Reel Auggie Stationary TMR Mixer series 3100. An exemplary dryer is the Heil model 9030 three-pass rotary drum dryer.
The dryer may be operated at around 600-1000° F. or at around 800-900° F. A burner 20 generates heat that is ducted to the dryer 22 to dry the wet product manure feedstock metered from the hopper 16 generating dried solids. The burner furnace 20 may be operated at a temperature in the range of about 1200-1400° F. or at about 1300° F. The burner furnace 20 may be constructed from 4½inch fire brick in the interior and 1 inch board for insulation. Dry sawdust or another suitable biomass may be used to start the furnace burner 20. The wet product manure feedstock from the hopper 16 may reside within the dryer for 2-5 minutes. In some applications, the pressed manure feedstock from the hopper 16 resides in the dryer for around 3 minutes.
The fuel used in the burner 20 may comprise various combustible materials. In an exemplary embodiment, the fuel comprises dried end-product 36. The fuel may further comprise various biomass materials such as sawdust, ground bean straw, corn fodder, ground corn stover, peat moss, paper mill sludge, ground switch grass, straw or the like or mixtures thereof. Various fuels are generally chosen such that the moisture content is less than around 10%.
The dried solids are transferred to a dry out 24 where tramp metal and large rocks are removed from the dried solids. The dried solids are then transferred to a cyclone 26 where solid end-product is generated in the form of solids to be blended with feed wet material 40, bedding 38 and fuel 36 to be transferred to the burner 20. The moisture content of the end-products 36,38,40 can be around 5% to 40%. In some applications, the moisture content of the end-products 36,38,40 is around 5%. The end-product 36, 38, 40 may be discharged at around 200° F.
The cyclone 26 may include a collector air lock and fan to exhaust gases 28 to the wet scrubber 30, the water oxidation ditch/trench 32 and/or to other scrubbing equipment 34 such as a thermal oxidizer. The trench 32 may be constructed from concrete and be 24 inches wide by 52 inches deep by 400 feet in length. The trench 32 may further include water sprayers spaced along the length of the trench every 50-100 feet. The exhaust gases 28 may be discharged into the trench 32 through a hole at the inlet of the trench 32. The temperature of the exhaust gases is in the range of around 180-225° F. The concrete trench advantageously reduces dust and other particulates released in the exhaust gases 28.
The exhaust gases 28 may also be discharged into one or more aerobic digesting lagoons. In an exemplary embodiment, the system includes three lagoons. Heat and aeration provided by the exhaust gases 28 may also be directed into lagoons and/or the trench 32 to aid in the aerobic digesting process. Each lagoon may be around 5 million gallons in volume. For some large-scale commercial applications, up to 3 lagoons are connected in series to digest raw manure whereby the last lagoon in the series would discharge clear effluent.
In another exemplary embodiment, as shown in
While this invention has been described in conjunction with various exemplary embodiments set forth herein, the invention includes alternatives, modifications, variations, improvements and/or equivalents that are apparent or foreseeable to the ordinary artisan. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments set forth herein are non-limiting and illustrative. Changes may be made to the exemplary embodiments within the scope of the invention without departing from the spirit of the invention. The invention, therefore, embraces suitable relevant earlier known alternatives, modifications, variations, improvements and substantial equivalents, conventional or otherwise.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2213667 | Dundas et al. | Sep 1940 | A |
3701727 | Kormanik | Oct 1972 | A |
3744145 | Maxwell et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3789797 | Brewer | Feb 1974 | A |
3800429 | Lindl | Apr 1974 | A |
4241515 | Wochnowski et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4359006 | Have | Nov 1982 | A |
4683814 | Plovanich et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
5052313 | Walker | Oct 1991 | A |
5195465 | Webb et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
6141905 | Rozental et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149694 | Redden, Jr. et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6224771 | Takeshima | May 2001 | B1 |
6367395 | Masek | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425933 | McDaniel et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6773595 | Gantzer | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6811701 | Wilkie | Nov 2004 | B2 |
20040065127 | Connell | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050249632 | Garrett et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070193063 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |