The present invention relates to ophthalmic surgical procedures and systems.
Cataract extraction is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures in the world with estimated 2.5 million cases performed annually in the United States and 9.1 million cases worldwide in 2000. This was expected to increase to approximately 13.3 million estimated global cases in 2006. This market is composed of various segments including intraocular lenses for implantation, viscoelastic polymers to facilitate surgical maneuvers, disposable instrumentation including ultrasonic phacoemulsification tips, tubing, and various knives and forceps. Modern cataract surgery is typically performed using a technique termed phacoemulsification in which an ultrasonic tip with an associated water stream for cooling purposes is used to sculpt the relatively hard nucleus of the lens after performance of an opening in the anterior lens capsule termed anterior capsulotomy or more recently capsulorhexis. Following these steps as well as removal of residual softer lens cortex by aspiration methods without fragmentation, a synthetic foldable intraocular lens (IOLs) is inserted into the eye through a small incision.
Many cataract patients are astigmatic. Astigmatism can occur when the cornea has a different curvature one direction than the other. IOLs are not presently used to correct beyond 5 D of astigmatism, even though many patients have more severe aberrations. Correcting it further often involves making the corneal shape more spherical, or at least more radially symmetrical. There have been numerous approaches, including Corneaplasty, Astigmatic Keratotomy (AK), Corneal Relaxing Incisions (CRI), and Limbal Relaxing Incisions (LRI). All are done using manual, mechanical incisions. Presently, astigmatism cannot easily or predictably be corrected fully using standard techniques and approaches. About one third of those who have surgery to correct the irregularity find that their eyes regress to a considerable degree and only a small improvement is noted. Another third of the patients find that the astigmatism has been significantly reduced but not fully corrected. The remaining third have the most encouraging results with most or all of the desired correction achieved.
What is needed are ophthalmic methods, techniques and apparatus to advance the standard of care of corneal shaping that may be associated with invasive cataract and other ophthalmic pathologies.
Rapid and precise opening formation in the cornea and/or limbus are possible using a scanning system that implements patterned laser cutting. The patterned laser cutting improves accuracy and precision, while decreasing procedure time.
A scanning system for treating target tissue in a patient's eye includes a light source for generating a light beam, a scanner for deflecting the light beam to form first and second treatment patterns of the light beam under the control of a controller, and a delivery system for delivering the first treatment pattern to the target tissue to form a cataract incision therein that provides access to an eye chamber of the patient's eye. The delivery system is also for delivering the second treatment pattern to the target tissue to form a relaxation incision along or near limbus tissue or along corneal tissue anterior to the limbus tissue of the patient's eye to reduce astigmatism thereof.
A method of treating target tissue in a patient's eye includes generating a light beam, deflecting the light beam using a scanner to form first and second treatment patterns, delivering the first treatment pattern to the target tissue to form an incision that provides access to an eye chamber of the patient's eye, and delivering the second treatment pattern to the target tissue to form a relaxation incision along or near limbus tissue or along corneal tissue anterior to the limbus tissue of the patient's eye to reduce astigmatism thereof.
Other objects and features of the present invention will become apparent by a review of the specification, claims and appended figures.
The techniques and systems disclosed herein provide many advantages over the current standard of care. Specifically, rapid and precise openings in the cornea and/or limbus are formed using 3-dimensional patterned laser cutting. The accuracy and precision of the incisions are improved over traditional methods, while the duration of the procedure and the risk associated with creating incisions are both reduced. The present invention can utilize anatomical and optical characterization and feedback to perform astigmatic keratotomy such as limbal and corneal relaxing incisions in conjunction with the creation of surgical incision that provides the surgeon access to the anterior chamber of an eye. The surgical incision may be made completely, or partially, depending upon the clinical situation. A wavefront sensor, interferometer, surface profiler, or other such device may be used to yield prescriptions for correcting the astigmatism or other visual aberrations. Likewise, these same devices may be used to verify the surgical correction of the patterned scanning system, even adjusting it during the treatment procedure to produce the desired outcome. Furthermore, the present invention may be used in multiple sessions to coordinate the healing of the astigmatic correction, and drive the corrective treatment over the course of the wound healing process. The present invention also provides for the image guided alignment of the incision.
There are surgical approaches provided by the present invention that enable the formation of very small and geometrically precise opening(s) and incision(s) in precise locations in and around the cornea and limbus. The incisions enable greater precision or modifications to conventional ophthalmic procedures as well as enable new procedures. The incision is not limited only to circular shapes but may be any shape that is conducive to healing or follow on procedures. These incisions might be placed such that they are able to seal spontaneously; or with autologous or synthetic tissue glue, photochemical bonding agent, or other such method. Furthermore, the present invention provides for the automated generation of incision patterns for optimal effect.
Another procedure enabled by the techniques described herein provides for the controlled formation of an incision or pattern of incisions. Conventional techniques are confined to areas accessible from outside the eye using mechanical cutting instruments and thus can only create incisions from anterior to posterior segments of tissue. In contrast, the controllable, patterned laser techniques described herein may be used to create an incision in virtually any position and in virtually any shape. Matching incisions may be made in both the anterior and posterior sections. The present invention is uniquely suited to perform such matching incisions.
Furthermore, these incisions may be tailored to complement an asymmetric IOL that is being inserted as part of the procedure or has been previously inserted. The present invention enables the measurement of the IOL placement and subsequent automated calculation and generation of these complimentary corneal or limbus incisions. The controllable, patterned laser techniques described herein have available and/or utilize precise lens measurement and other dimensional information that allows the incision or opening formation while minimizing impact on surrounding tissue.
The present invention can be implemented by a system that projects or scans an optical beam into a patient's eye 68, such as system 2 shown in
The laser 4 is controlled by control electronics 300, via an input and output device 302, to create optical beam 6. Control electronics 300 may be a computer, microcontroller, etc. In this example, the entire system is controlled by the controller 300, and data moved through input/output device IO 302. A graphical user interface GUI 304 may be used to set system operating parameters, process user input (UI) 306 on the GUI 304, and display gathered information such as images of ocular structures.
The generated UF light beam 6 proceeds towards the patient eye 68 passing through half-wave plate, 8, and linear polarizer, 10. The polarization state of the beam can be adjusted so that the desired amount of light passes through half-wave plate 8 and linear polarizer 10, which together act as a variable attenuator for the UF beam 6. Additionally, the orientation of linear polarizer 10 determines the incident polarization state incident upon beamcombiner 34, thereby optimizing beamcombiner throughput.
The UF beam proceeds through a shutter 12, aperture 14, and a pickoff device 16. The system controlled shutter 12 ensures on/off control of the laser for procedural and safety reasons. The aperture sets an outer useful diameter for the laser beam and the pickoff monitors the output of the useful beam. The pickoff device 16 includes of a partially reflecting mirror 20 and a detector 18. Pulse energy, average power, or a combination may be measured using detector 18. The information can be used for feedback to the half-wave plate 8 for attenuation and to verify whether the shutter 12 is open or closed. In addition, the shutter 12 may have position sensors to provide a redundant state detection.
The beam passes through a beam conditioning stage 22, in which beam parameters such as beam diameter, divergence, circularity, and astigmatism can be modified. In this illustrative example, the beam conditioning stage 22 includes a 2 element beam expanding telescope comprised of spherical optics 24 and 26 in order to achieve the intended beam size and collimation. Although not illustrated here, an anamorphic or other optical system can be used to achieve the desired beam parameters. The factors used to determine these beam parameters include the output beam parameters of the laser, the overall magnification of the system, and the desired numerical aperture (NA) at the treatment location. In addition, the optical system 22 can be used to image aperture 14 to a desired location (e.g. the center location between the 2-axis scanning device 50 described below). In this way, the amount of light that makes it through the aperture 14 is assured to make it through the scanning system. Pickoff device 16 is then a reliable measure of the usable light.
After exiting conditioning stage 22, beam 6 reflects off of fold mirrors 28, 30, & 32. These mirrors can be adjustable for alignment purposes. The beam 6 is then incident upon beam combiner 34. Beamcombiner 34 reflects the UF beam 6 (and transmits both the OCT 114 and aim 202 beams described below). For efficient beamcombiner operation, the angle of incidence is preferably kept below 45 degrees and the polarization where possible of the beams is fixed. For the UF beam 6, the orientation of linear polarizer 10 provides fixed polarization.
Following the beam combiner 34, the beam 6 continues onto the z-adjust or Z scan device 40. In this illustrative example the z-adjust includes a Galilean telescope with two lens groups 42 and 44 (each lens group includes one or more lenses). Lens group 42 moves along the z-axis about the collimation position of the telescope. In this way, the focus position of the spot in the patient's eye 68 moves along the z-axis as indicated. In general there is a fixed linear relationship between the motion of lens 42 and the motion of the focus. In this case, the z-adjust telescope has an approximate 2× beam expansion ratio and a 1:1 relationship of the movement of lens 42 to the movement of the focus. Alternatively, lens group 44 could be moved along the z-axis to actuate the z-adjust, and scan. The z-adjust is the z-scan device for treatment in the eye 68. It can be controlled automatically and dynamically by the system and selected to be independent or to interplay with the X-Y scan device described next. Mirrors 36 and 38 can be used for aligning the optical axis with the axis of z-adjust device 40.
After passing through the z-adjust device 40, the beam 6 is directed to the x-y scan device by mirrors 46 & 48. Mirrors 46 & 48 can be adjustable for alignment purposes. X-Y scanning is achieved by the scanning device 50 preferably using two mirrors 52 & 54 under the control of control electronics 300, which rotate in orthogonal directions using motors, galvanometers, or any other well known optic moving device. Mirrors 52 & 54 are located near the telecentric position of the objective lens 58 and contact lens 66 combination described below. Tilting these mirrors 52/54 causes them to deflect beam 6, causing lateral displacements in the plane of UF focus located in the patient's eye 68. Objective lens 58 may be a complex multi-element lens element, as shown, and represented by lenses 60, 62, and 64. The complexity of the lens 58 will be dictated by the scan field size, the focused spot size, the available working distance on both the proximal and distal sides of objective 58, as well as the amount of aberration control. An f-theta lens 58 of focal length 60 mm generating a spot size of 10 μm, over a field of 10 mm, with an input beam size of 15 mm diameter is an example. Alternatively, X-Y scanning by scanner 50 may be achieved by using one or more moveable optical elements (e.g. lenses, gratings) which also may be controlled by control electronics 300, via input and output device 302.
The aiming and treatment scan patterns can be automatically generated by the scanner 50 under the control of controller 300. Such patterns may be comprised of a single spot of light, multiple spots of light, a continuous pattern of light, multiple continuous patterns of light, and/or any combination of these. In addition, the aiming pattern (using aim beam 202 described below) need not be identical to the treatment pattern (using light beam 6), but preferably at least defines its boundaries in order to assure that the treatment light is delivered only within the desired target area for patient safety. This may be done, for example, by having the aiming pattern provide an outline of the intended treatment pattern. This way the spatial extent of the treatment pattern may be made known to the user, if not the exact locations of the individual spots themselves, and the scanning thus optimized for speed, efficiency and accuracy. The aiming pattern may also be made to be perceived as blinking in order to further enhance its visibility to the user.
An optional contact lens 66, which can be any suitable ophthalmic lens, can be used to help further focus the optical beam 6 into the patient's eye 68 while helping to stabilize eye position. The positioning and character of optical beam 6 and/or the scan pattern the beam 6 forms on the eye 68 may be further controlled by use of an input device such as a joystick, or any other appropriate user input device (e.g. GUI 304) to position the patient and/or the optical system.
The UF laser 4 and controller 300 can be set to target the surfaces of the targeted structures in the eye 68 and ensure that the beam 6 will be focused where appropriate and not unintentionally damage non-targeted tissue. Imaging modalities and techniques described herein, such as for example, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), Purkinje imaging, Scheimpflug imaging, or ultrasound may be used to determine the location and measure the thickness of the lens and lens capsule to provide greater precision to the laser focusing methods, including 2D and 3D patterning. Laser focusing may also be accomplished using one or more methods including direct observation of an aiming beam, Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT), Purkinje imaging, Scheimpflug imaging, ultrasound, or other known ophthalmic or medical imaging modalities and/or combinations thereof. In the embodiment of
The OCT device 100 in
Exiting connector 112, the OCT beam 114 is collimated using lens 116. The size of the collimated beam 114 is determined by the focal length of lens 116. The size of the beam 114 is dictated by the desired NA at the focus in the eye and the magnification of the beam train leading to the eye 68. Generally, OCT beam 114 does not require as high an NA as the UF beam 6 in the focal plane and therefore the OCT beam 114 is smaller in diameter than the UF beam 6 at the beamcombiner 34 location. Following collimating lens 116 is aperture 118 which further modifies the resultant NA of the OCT beam 114 at the eye. The diameter of aperture 118 is chosen to optimize OCT light incident on the target tissue and the strength of the return signal. Polarization control element 120, which may be active or dynamic, is used to compensate for polarization state changes which may be induced by individual differences in corneal birefringence, for example. Mirrors 122 & 124 are then used to direct the OCT beam 114 towards beamcombiners 126 & 34. Mirrors 122 & 124 may be adjustable for alignment purposes and in particular for overlaying of OCT beam 114 to UF beam 6 subsequent to beamcombiner 34. Similarly, beamcombiner 126 is used to combine the OCT beam 114 with the aim beam 202 described below.
Once combined with the UF beam 6 subsequent to beamcombiner 34, OCT beam 114 follows the same path as UF beam 6 through the rest of the system. In this way, OCT beam 114 is indicative of the location of UF beam 6. OCT beam 114 passes through the z-scan 40 and x-y scan 50 devices then the objective lens 58, contact lens 66 and on into the eye 68. Reflections and scatter off of structures within the eye provide return beams that retrace back through the optical system, into connector 112, through coupler 104, and to OCT detector 128. These return back reflections provide the OCT signals that are in turn interpreted by the system as to the location in X, Y Z of UF beam 6 focal location.
OCT device 100 works on the principle of measuring differences in optical path length between its reference and sample arms. Therefore, passing the OCT through z-adjust 40 does not extend the z-range of OCT system 100 because the optical path length does not change as a function of movement of 42. OCT system 100 has an inherent z-range that is related to the detection scheme, and in the case of frequency domain detection it is specifically related to the spectrometer and the location of the reference arm 106. In the case of OCT system 100 used in
Because of the fundamental differences in the OCT measurement with respect to the UF focus device due to influences such as immersion index, refraction, and aberration, both chromatic and monochromatic, care must be taken in analyzing the OCT signal with respect to the UF beam focal location. A calibration or registration procedure as a function of X, Y Z should be conducted in order to match the OCT signal information to the UF focus location and also to the relate to absolute dimensional quantities.
Observation of an aim beam may also be used to assist the user to directing the UF laser focus. Additionally, an aim beam visible to the unaided eye in lieu of the infrared OCT and UF beams can be helpful with alignment provided the aim beam accurately represents the infrared beam parameters. An aim subsystem 200 is employed in the configuration shown in
Once the aim beam light source generates aim beam 202, the aim beam 202 is collimated using lens 204. The size of the collimated beam is determined by the focal length of lens 204. The size of the aim beam 202 is dictated by the desired NA at the focus in the eye and the magnification of the beam train leading to the eye 68. Generally, aim beam 202 should have close to the same NA as UF beam 6 in the focal plane and therefore aim beam 202 is of similar diameter to the UF beam at the beamcombiner 34 location. Because the aim beam is meant to stand-in for the UF beam 6 during system alignment to the target tissue of the eye, much of the aim path mimics the UF path as described previously. The aim beam 202 proceeds through a half-wave plate 206 and linear polarizer 208. The polarization state of the aim beam 202 can be adjusted so that the desired amount of light passes through polarizer 208. Elements 206 & 208 therefore act as a variable attenuator for the aim beam 202. Additionally, the orientation of polarizer 208 determines the incident polarization state incident upon beamcombiners 126 and 34, thereby fixing the polarization state and allowing for optimization of the beamcombiners' throughput. Of course, if a semiconductor laser is used as aim beam light source 200, the drive current can be varied to adjust the optical power.
The aim beam 202 proceeds through a shutter 210 and aperture 212. The system controlled shutter 210 provides on/off control of the aim beam 202. The aperture 212 sets an outer useful diameter for the aim beam 202 and can be adjusted appropriately. A calibration procedure measuring the output of the aim beam 202 at the eye can be used to set the attenuation of aim beam 202 via control of polarizer 206.
The aim beam 202 next passes through a beam conditioning device 214. Beam parameters such as beam diameter, divergence, circularity, and astigmatism can be modified using one or more well known beaming conditioning optical elements. In the case of an aim beam 202 emerging from an optical fiber, the beam conditioning device 214 can simply include a beam expanding telescope with two optical elements 216 and 218 in order to achieve the intended beam size and collimation. The final factors used to determine the aim beam parameters such as degree of collimation are dictated by what is necessary to match the UF beam 6 and aim beam 202 at the location of the eye 68. Chromatic differences can be taken into account by appropriate adjustments of beam conditioning device 214. In addition, the optical system 214 is used to image aperture 212 to a desired location such as a conjugate location of aperture 14.
The aim beam 202 next reflects off of fold mirrors 222 & 220, which are preferably adjustable for alignment registration to UF beam 6 subsequent to beam combiner 34. The aim beam 202 is then incident upon beam combiner 126 where the aim beam 202 is combined with OCT beam 114. Beamcombiner 126 reflects the aim beam 202 and transmits the OCT beam 114, which allows for efficient operation of the beamcombining functions at both wavelength ranges. Alternatively, the transmit and reflect functions of beamcombiner 126 can be reversed and the configuration inverted. Subsequent to beamcombiner 126, aim beam 202 along with OCT beam 114 is combined with UF beam 6 by beamcombiner 34.
A device for imaging the target tissue on or within the eye 68 is shown schematically in
The illumination light from light source 86 is directed down towards the eye using the same objective lens 58 and contact lens 66 as the UF and aim beam 6, 202. The light reflected and scattered off of various structures in the eye 68 are collected by the same lenses 58 & 66 and directed back towards beamcombiner 56. There, the return light is directed back into the viewing path via beam combiner and mirror 82, and on to camera 74. Camera 74 can be, for example but not limited to, any silicon based detector array of the appropriately sized format. Video lens 76 forms an image onto the camera's detector array while optical elements 80 & 78 provide polarization control and wavelength filtering respectively. Aperture or iris 81 provides control of imaging NA and therefore depth of focus and depth of field. A small aperture provides the advantage of large depth of field which aids in the patient docking procedure. Alternatively, the illumination and camera paths can be switched. Furthermore, aim light source 200 can be made to emit in the infrared which would not directly visible, but could be captured and displayed using imaging system 71.
Coarse adjust registration is usually needed so that when the contact lens 66 comes into contact with the cornea, the targeted structures are in the capture range of the X, Y scan of the system. Therefore a docking procedure is preferred, which preferably takes in account patient motion as the system approaches the contact condition (i.e. contact between the patient's eye 68 and the contact lens 66. The viewing system 71 is configured so that the depth of focus is large enough such that the patient's eye 68 and other salient features may be seen before the contact lens 66 makes contact with eye 68.
Preferably, a motion control system 70 is integrated into the overall control system 2, and may move the patient, the system 2 or elements thereof, or both, to achieve accurate and reliable contact between contact lens 66 and eye 68. Furthermore, a vacuum suction subsystem and flange may be incorporated into system 2, and used to stabilize eye 68. The alignment of eye 68 to system 2 via contact lens 66 may be accomplished while monitoring the output of imaging system 71, and performed manually or automatically by analyzing the images produced by imaging system 71 electronically by means of control electronics 300 via IO 302. Force and/or pressure sensor feedback may also be used to discern contact, as well as to initiate the vacuum subsystem.
An alternative beamcombining configuration is shown in the alternate embodiment of
Another alternate embodiment is shown in
The present invention provides for creating the incision to allow access for the lens removal instrumentation, typically referred to as the “cataract incision.” This is shown as cataract incision 402 on the patient's eye 68 illustrated in
The present invention may make use of the integrated OCT system 100 to discern limbus 408 and sclera 410 relative to cornea 406 by virtue of the large optical scattering differences between them. These can be directly imaged using OCT device 100, and the location of the transition (limbus 408) from clear (cornea 406) to scattering (sclera 410) can be determined and used by CPU 300 of system 2 to guide the placement of the laser-created incisions. The scanner position values corresponding to this transition define the location of limbus 408. Thus, once registered to each other, OCT 100 can guide the position of beam 6 relative to limbus 408. This same imaging approach may be used to discern the thickness of the tissue, as well. Thus, the depth of the incisions and their disposition within the tissue may be precisely defined. With that in mind, the choice of wavelength for OCT device 100 preferably accounts for the requirement of scleral measurement. Wavelengths in the range of 800-1400 nm are especially suited for this, as they are less scattered in tissue (and penetrate to depths of ˜1 mm) while not suffering from linear optical absorption by water or other tissue constituents that would otherwise diminish their performance.
Standard cataract incisions typically require ˜30° of limbal angle as seen from directly above the eye. Such incisions have been shown to induce from 0-1.0 D of astigmatism, on average. Thus, achieving postoperative emmetropia can be made more difficult. To address astigmatism, the present invention may also produce Astigmatic Kerototomy (AK) incisions. Such incisions are routinely used to correct astigmatism by relaxing an asymmetrically shaped cornea along its steep axis. Similar to the cataract incision, such relaxing incisions (RIs) must be accurately placed along or nearby the limbus and are known as Limbal Relaxing Incisions (LRIs). Relaxing incisions, however, are only partially penetrating incisions. They should leave at least 200 μm of tissue thickness in order to maintain its ongoing structural integrity. Similarly, Corneal Relaxing Incisions (CRIs) are incisions that are placed anterior to the limbus in the clear corneal tissue to serve the same clinical purpose of astigmatic correction. In addition to the specific clinical details, the circumferential orientation and angular extent are also influenced by the cataract incision. Thus, with the present invention, the RIs may be planned and executed in conjunction with the cataract incision to achieve a better visual correction than otherwise possible. To optimize the entire treatment, the cataract incision should not be placed at or near the steep axis of the cornea. If it is, only one RI is traditionally recommended. There are a variety of nomograms based upon empirical observations that are currently used by clinicians to prescribe the placement and extent of RIs. These include, but are not limited to, the Donnenfeld, Gills, Nichamin, and Koch nomograms.
In this embodiment, profilometer 415 may be used to prescribe an astigmatic keratotomy to correct the shape of a patient's cornea to diminish its astigmatism. The profilometer 415 may be a placido system, triangulation system, laser displacement sensor, interferometer, or other such device, which measures the corneal topography also known as the surface profile or the surface sag (i.e. sagitta) of the cornea as a function of the transverse dimension to some defined axis. This axis is typically the visual axis of the eye but can also be the optical axis of the cornea. Alternately, profilometer 415 may be replaced by a wavefront sensor to more fully optically characterize the patient's eye. A wavefront sensing system measures the aberration of the eye's optical system. A common technique for accomplishing this task is a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor, which measures the shape of the wavefronts of light (surfaces of constant phase) that exit the eye's pupil. If the eye were a perfect optical system, these wavefronts would be perfectly flat. Since the eye is not perfect, the wavefronts are not flat and have irregular curved shapes. A Shack-Hartmann sensor divides up the incoming beam and its overall wavefront into sub-beams, dividing up the wavefront into separate facets, each focused by a microlens onto a subarray of detection pixels. Depending upon where the focal spot from each facet strikes its subarray of pixels, it is then possible to determine the local wavefront inclination (or tilt). Subsequent analysis of all facets together leads to determination of the overall wavefront form. These deviations from the perfectly overall flat wavefront are indicative of the localized corrections that can be made in the corneal surface. The measurements of the wavefront sensor may be used by controller 300 to automatically prescribe an astigmatic keratotomy via predictive algorithms resident in the system, as mentioned above.
The desired length, number, and depth of relaxing incisions 420 can be determined using nomograms. A starting point nomogram can titrate surgery by length and number of LRIs. However, the length and placement can vary based on topography and other factors. The goal is to reduce cylindrical optical power and to absolutely avoid overcorrecting with-the-rule astigmatism, because against-the-rule astigmatism should be minimized. Relaxing incisions formed in the sclera, limbus, or cornea are generally used for cases of with-the-rule astigmatism and low against-the-rule astigmatism. When using the relaxing incision in conjunction with against-the-rule astigmatism, the LRI can be moved slightly into the cornea, or, alternatively, the LRI could be placed opposite another relaxing incision in the sclera, limbus or cornea. For patients who have with-the-rule astigmatism or oblique astigmatism, the relaxing incision is made temporally, and the LRIs are placed at the steep axis. The placement of the LRI should be customized to the topography of the cornea. In cases of asymmetric astigmatism, the LRI in the steepest axis can be elongated slightly and then shortened the same amount in the flatter of the 2 steep axes. Paired LRIs do not have to be made in the same meridian. Patients with low (<1.5 D) against-the-rule astigmatism receive only a single LRI in the steep meridian, placed opposite to the cataract incision. However, if astigmatism is greater than 1.5 D, a pair of LRIs should be used. In against-the-rule astigmatism cases, one pair of LRIs may be incorporated into the cataract incision. The length of the LRI is not affected by the presence of the cataract incision. This is difficult to perform precisely with present methods. In low with-the-rule astigmatism cases, a single 6-mm LRI (0.6 mm in depth) is made at 90°. The LRI can be independent of the cataract incision in with-the-rule astigmatism cases (if the cataract incision is temporal and the LRI is superior).
Furthermore, unlike traditional cold steel surgical approaches to creating incisions that must start at the outside and cut inwards, using a light source for making these incisions allows for RI 420 to be made from the inside out and thus better preserve the structural integrity of the tissue and limit the risk of tearing and infection. Moreover, the cataract incision 402 and the relaxation incision(s) 420 can be made automatically using the imaging and scanning features of system 2. A pair of treatment patterns can be generated that forms incisions 402 and 420, thus providing more accurate control over the absolute and relative positioning of these incisions. The pair of treatment patterns can be applied sequentially, or simultaneously (i.e. the pair of treatment patterns can be combined into a single treatment pattern that forms both types of incisions). For proper alignment of the treatment beam pattern, an aiming beam and/or pattern from system 2 can be first projected onto the target tissue with visible light indicating where the treatment pattern(s) will be projected. This allows the surgeon to adjust and confirm the size, location and shape of the treatment pattern(s) before their actual application. Thereafter, the two or three dimensional treatment pattern(s) can be rapidly applied to the target tissue using the scanning capabilities of system 2.
Specialized scan patterns for creating alternate geometries for cataract incisions 402 that are not achievable using conventional techniques are also possible. An example is illustrated in
For large fields as when incisions are made in the outer most regions such as the limbus or sclera, a specialized contact lens can be used. This contact lens could be in the form of a gonioscopic mirror or lens. The lens does not need to be diametrically symmetric. Just one portion of the lens can be extended to reach the outer regions of the eye such as the limbus 408 and sclera 410. Any targeted location can be reached by the proper rotation of the specialized lens.
It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiment(s) described above and illustrated herein, but encompasses any and all variations falling within the scope of the appended claims. For example, references to the present invention herein are not intended to limit the scope of any claim or claim term, but instead merely make reference to one or more features that may be covered by one or more of the claims. All the optical elements downstream of scanner 50 shown in
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/948,192, filed Nov. 20, 2015, allowed, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/569,103, filed Aug. 7, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,233,024, issued Jan. 12, 2016, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/048,186, filed Mar. 13, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,233,023, issued Jan. 12, 2016, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/906,944, filed Mar. 13, 2007. All of the above-mentioned applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4169664 | Bailey, Jr. | Oct 1979 | A |
4309998 | Aron et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4538608 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Sep 1985 | A |
4684796 | Johnson | Aug 1987 | A |
4901718 | Bille et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4907586 | Bille et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4917486 | Raven et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4995715 | Cohen | Feb 1991 | A |
5098426 | Sklar et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5112328 | Taboada et al. | May 1992 | A |
5246435 | Bille et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5257988 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Nov 1993 | A |
5284477 | Hanna et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5336216 | Dewey | Aug 1994 | A |
5336217 | Buys et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5391165 | Fountain et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5411510 | Fugo | May 1995 | A |
5437658 | Muller et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5459570 | Swanson et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5480396 | Simon et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5491524 | Hellmuth et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493109 | Wei et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5505693 | Mackool | Apr 1996 | A |
5520679 | Lin | May 1996 | A |
5531753 | Oliveira | Jul 1996 | A |
5549632 | Lai | Aug 1996 | A |
5599341 | Mathis et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5702441 | Zhou | Dec 1997 | A |
5719673 | Dorsel et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5720894 | Neev et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5722427 | Wakil et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5743902 | Trost | Apr 1998 | A |
5748352 | Hattori | May 1998 | A |
5748898 | Ueda | May 1998 | A |
5779696 | Berry et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5865830 | Parel et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5906611 | Dodick et al. | May 1999 | A |
5957915 | Trost | Sep 1999 | A |
5971978 | Mukai | Oct 1999 | A |
5980513 | Frey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984916 | Lai | Nov 1999 | A |
5993438 | Juhasz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002127 | Vestal et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6004314 | Wei et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6019472 | Koester et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6053613 | Wei et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057543 | Vestal et al. | May 2000 | A |
6079417 | Fugo | Jun 2000 | A |
6099522 | Knopp et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110166 | Juhasz | Aug 2000 | A |
6111645 | Tearney et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6146375 | Juhasz et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6149644 | Xie | Nov 2000 | A |
6171336 | Sawusch | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6210401 | Lai et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6254595 | Juhasz et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281493 | Vestal et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6322556 | Gwon et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324191 | Horvath | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6325792 | Swinger | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328733 | Trost | Dec 2001 | B1 |
RE37504 | Lin | Jan 2002 | E |
6344040 | Juhasz et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
RE37585 | Mourou et al. | Mar 2002 | E |
6373571 | Juhasz et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6396587 | Knupfer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
D459806 | Webb | Jul 2002 | S |
D459807 | Webb | Jul 2002 | S |
D462442 | Webb | Sep 2002 | S |
D462443 | Webb | Sep 2002 | S |
6454761 | Freedman | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6497701 | Shimmick et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6585723 | Sumiya | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610050 | Bille | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6623476 | Kurtz et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6638271 | Munnerlyn et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6648877 | Juhasz et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6652511 | Tomita | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6676653 | Juhasz et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6693927 | Horvath et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6706036 | Lai | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726679 | Dick et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6751033 | Goldstein et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6902561 | Kurtz et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7027233 | Goldstein et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7146983 | Hohla et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7655002 | Myers, I et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7717907 | Ruiz et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8186357 | Lubatschowski et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8262646 | Frey et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8350183 | Vogel et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8382745 | Naranjo-Tackman et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8394084 | Blumenkranz et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8414564 | Goldshleger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8430921 | Wong et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8808279 | Muhlhoff et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9107732 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9233024 | Culbertson | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9271870 | Palanker et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9474648 | Palanker et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9474649 | Palanker et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9480601 | Palanker et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
10709548 | Culbertson | Jul 2020 | B2 |
20010016736 | Lin | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010020163 | Clapman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020103478 | Gwon et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020128637 | Von et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020173778 | Knopp et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030053219 | Manzi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030060880 | Feingold | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030098834 | Ide et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030125718 | Munnerlyn et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040021874 | Shimmick | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054358 | Cox et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040148022 | Eggleston | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040199150 | Lai | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243112 | Bendett et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263785 | Chernyak | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050096639 | Slatkine et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050241653 | Van et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060100677 | Blumenkranz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060106372 | Kuhn et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060224147 | Abe et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235428 | Silvestrini | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247659 | Moeller et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060279698 | Muehlhoff et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070173794 | Frey et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173795 | Frey et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185175 | Liu et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070276269 | Yun et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282313 | Huang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080033406 | Andersen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058704 | Hee et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080058841 | Kurtz et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082086 | Kurtz et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080177256 | Loesel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080281303 | Culbertson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080281413 | Culbertson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090012507 | Culbertson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090118718 | Raksi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131921 | Kurtz et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100137850 | Culbertson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137982 | Culbertson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100137983 | Culbertson et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100191226 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100324542 | Kurtz | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110184392 | Culbertson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110319873 | Raksi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110319875 | Loesel et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20160074218 | Palanker | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19938203 | Feb 2001 | DE |
10207535 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10334108 | Feb 2005 | DE |
10339520 | Mar 2005 | DE |
102005027355 | Dec 2006 | DE |
1279386 | Jan 2003 | EP |
0700310 | Nov 2003 | EP |
1364632 | Nov 2003 | EP |
2211802 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2772234 | May 2021 | EP |
2006136714 | Jun 2006 | JP |
2165248 | Apr 2001 | RU |
9308877 | May 1993 | WO |
9316631 | Sep 1993 | WO |
9407424 | Apr 1994 | WO |
9409849 | May 1994 | WO |
0119303 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0183155 | Nov 2001 | WO |
02064031 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2004026198 | Apr 2004 | WO |
2005102200 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2006074469 | Jul 2006 | WO |
2006102971 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2006119584 | Nov 2006 | WO |
2008030718 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2008112292 | Sep 2008 | WO |
2009059251 | May 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Agarwal A., et al., “Phacoemulsification Laser Cataract Surgery and Foldable IOLs,” Extract from the book, 2000, pp. 99-112. |
Agarwal et al., “Phaco Nightmares,”Extract from the book , Thorofare, NJ (USA), 2006, pp. 1-4. |
Albert D.M., et al., “Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology,” Saunders Elsevier, 2008, pp. 991-995. |
Bahadur G.G., et al., “Manual of Cataract Surgery,” Second edition, published by Butterworth Heinemann, Boston, 2000, pp. 27-33. |
Bille J., et al., “Aberration-Free Refractive Surgery New Frontiers in Vision,” Extract from the Book, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Oct. 31, 2004, pp. 239-256. |
Brian S.D., et al., “Cataract and Glaucoma for Eyecare Paraprofessionals,” Extract from the book, published by SLACK Incorporated, Thorofare, NJ (USA), 1999, pp. 34-35. |
Brochure, “Lasik Surgery One Use-Plus SBK the Moria Option for SBK,” issued by Moria SA, Antony in 2011, web address https://www.iogen.fi/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/moria-one-use-plus-sbk.pdf. |
Buratto L., et al., “Phacoemulsification Principles and Techniques,” second edition, Extract from the book, SLACK Incorporated, Thorofare, NJ (USA), 2003, pp. 265-277. |
Dausinger F., et al., “Femtosecond Technology for Technical and Medical Applications,” Springer, 2004, 21 pages. |
Ernest P.H., et al., “Relative Stability of Clear Corneal Incisions in a Cadaver Eye Model,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1995, vol. 21, pp. 39-42. |
Evidence for publication date of Kiraly L., et al., “Reduction of Astigmatism by Arcuate Incisions Using the Femtosecond Laser After Corneal Transplantation,” Clinical Monthly Journals for Ophthalmology, 2008, 1 page. |
Evidence for the publication date of document D32. Document D30 is a screenshot of the entries of the database “google scholar”, https://scholar.google.com/, which indicates the publication data (Journal, issue and publication year) of document D32. |
Fermann M.E., et al., “Ultrafast Lasers Technology and Applications,” Extract from the Book, Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2003, pp. 745-749. |
Gimbel H.V., “Divide and Conquer Nucleofractis Phacoemulsification,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1991, vol. 17, pp. 281-291. |
Howard M.L., et al., “Corneal Disorders, Clinical Diagnosis and Management,” W. B. Saunders Company, 1984, pp. 645-849. |
Kampik et al., “Augenarztliche Therapie,” Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, 2002, pp. 70, 165, 166, 168, 169. |
Kohnen T., et al., “Cataract and Refractive Surgery,” Essentials in ophthalmology, 2005, Foreword, Preface, Chapter 2 and 14, pp. 19-36, 217-234. |
Kohnen T., et al., “Basic Knowledge of Refractive Surgery,” Correction of Refractive Errors Using Modern Surgical Procedures, Continuing Medical Education, 2018, vol. 105 (9), pp. 163-172. |
Kulikova I.L., “Corneal lid resected with Intralase 60 kHZ Femtosecond Laser:Features of Stromal Healing,” Ophthalmosurgery, 2009, vol. 4, pp. 41-45. |
Kulikova I.L., “Use of the First Femtosecond Laser in Russia in Refractive Surgery,” Aug. 2012, vol. 4 (59), pp. 17 to 22. |
Macrae, S.M et al., “Wavefront Guided Ablation,”American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2001, vol. 132(6), pp. 915-919. |
Macsai M.S., “Ophthalmic Microsurgical Suturing Techniques,” Extract from the book, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007, Preface and pp. 29-30. |
Martinez C.E., et al., “Corneal Topography in Cataract Surgery,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 1996, vol. 7(1), pp. 31-38. |
Masket S., “Proper wound construction to prevent short-term ocular hypotony after clear corneal incision cataract surgery,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 2007, vol. 33, pp. 383-386. |
Mian S.I., et al., “Femtosecond Laser-assisted Corneal Surgery,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2007, vol. 18 (4), pp. 295-299. |
Neuhann T., et al., “Femtosecond Laser Offers Surgical Precision and Versatility, but at a Higher Price,” EuroTimes, 2007, pp. 18. |
Priority document of the opposed U.S. Appl. No. 60/906,944, 56 pages. |
Rao B., et al., “Imaging and Investigating the Effects of Incision Angle of Clear Corneal Cataract Surgery With Optical Coherence Tomography,” Optics Express, Dec. 2003, vol. 11 (24), pp. 3254-3261. |
Screenshot from the database “Wayback Machine”, is available from the website of the ESCRS, https://www.escrs.org/PUBLICATIONS/EUROTIMES/07sept/Femtosecondlaseroffers.pdf, was publicly available on Nov. 2007. The screenshot was generated in Feb. 2022. The red dot on Nov. 17, 2007 indicates that the above internet address was located at this date by the “wayback machine”. |
Screenshot from the database “pubmed.gov”, accessible via the link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, which indicates the publication date of document D42, 1 page. |
Screenshot from the database “pubmed.gov”, accessible via the link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, which indicates the publication date of document D50 (i.e. Mar. 2007), 1 page. |
Screenshot from the database “pubmed.gov”, accessible via the link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, which is evidence for the publication date of document D37 (i.e. Jan. 2008; see also document D4 for further evidence). |
Screenshot from the website https://semanticscholar.org, a database for scientific publications, which indicates the publication date of D27 (i.e. Feb. 29, 2008). |
Screenshot from “www.amazon.co.uk”, an online bookseller. The printout indicates the publication date of D54 (i.e. Feb. 27, 2008). The screenshot was generated in Feb. 2022. |
Screenshot from “https://amazon.co.uk”, which is an online booseller. The screenshot was genertead in Feb. 2022 and indicates the publication date of document D9 (Jul. 15, 2007), 1 page. |
Screenshot from the website “https://www.amazon.de”, which is an online bookseller. The screenshot indicates the publication date of document D57 (i.e. Jan. 4, 2008). The screenshot was generated in Feb. 2022. |
Shalini M., et al., “Wound Construction,” DOS Times, Jul. 2007, vol. 13 (1), pp. 13-21. |
Slade S.G., “Applications for the Femtosecond Laser in Corneal Surgery,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2007, vol. 18, pp. 338-341. |
Steinert R.F., et al., “Anterior Segment Optical Coherene Tomography,” Extract from the book published by Slack Incorporated, Jan. 2008, cover page, Foreword, Introduction, pp. 35 to 47 (chapter 4), 49 to 61 (chapter 5) and pp. 63 to 70 (chapter 6) and pp. 165 to 173 (chapter 16) and rear cover page. |
Theodore K., et al., “Complications in Ophthalmic Surgery,” Extract from the book, Second Edition, Mosby, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri (USA), 1993, pp. 57-155. |
Vass C., et al., “Comparative Study of Corneal Topographic Changes After 3.0 mm Beveled and Hinged Clear Corneal Incisions,” Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 1998, vol. 24, pp. 1498-1504. |
William E.B., et al., “Current Techniques in Ophthalmic Laser Surgery,” Extract from the book, Current Medicine, 1994, pp. 2-8 and 190-197. |
Gills J.P., “Treating Astigmatism at the Time of Cataract Surgery”, Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 2002, vol. 13 (1), pp. 2-6. |
Abstract of AU Publication No. 2007292491, Publication Date Mar. 13, 2008, which is the AU counterpart of the WO08030718 A2 application. |
Baikoff G., et al., “Contact Between 3 Phakic Intraocular Lens Models and the Crystalline Lens: An Anterior Chamber Optical Coherence Tomography Study,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Sep. 2004, vol. 30 (9), pp. 2007-2012. |
Boppart S.A., et al., “High-Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Laser Ablation of Surgical Tissue,” Journal of Surgical Research, 1999, vol. 82 (2), pp. 275-284. |
Dodick J.M., et al., “Current Techniques in Laser Cataract Surgery,” in: Phacoemulsification: New Technology and Clinical Application, Fine H.I., ed., Slack Incorporated, Chapter 9, 1996, 17 pages. |
Fujimoto J.G., et al., “Optical and Acoustical Imaging of Biological Media: Optical Coherence Tomography,” Applied Physics and Biophysics, 2001, vol. 2 (IV), pp. 1099-1111. |
Geerling G., et al., “Initial Clinical Experience with the Picosecond Nd:YLF Laser for Intraocular Therapeutic Applications,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, May 1998, vol. 82 (5), pp. 504-509. |
Gimbel H.V., et al., “Continuous Curvilinear Capsulorhexis,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Jan. 1991, vol. 17 (1), pp. 110-111. |
Gimbel H.V., et al., “Development, Advantages and Methods of the Continuous Circular Capsulorhexis Technique,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Jan. 1990, vol. 16 (1), pp. 31-37. |
Gimbel H.V., et al., “Principles of Nuclear Phaco Emulsification”In: Cataract Surgery Techniques Complications and Management, 2nd edition., Steinert et al., Oct. 2003, Chap. 15, pp. 153-181. |
Izatt J.A., et al., “Micrometer-Scale Resolution Imaging of the Anterior Eye In Vivo With Optical Coherence Tomography,” Arch Ophthalmology, Dec. 1994, vol. 112 (12), pp. 1584-1589. |
Masket S., “Control of Corneal Astigmatism in regard to Multifocal Lens Implants,” in: Current Concepts of Multifocal Intraocular Lenses, Maxwell A., eds., Slack Incorporated, 1991, Chapter 15, 22 pages. |
Steinert et al., “Neodymium: Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Posterior Capsulotomy,” in: Cataract Surgery Techniques Complications and Management, 2nd edition., Steinert et al., Oct. 2003, Chapter. 44, pp. 531-544. |
Elander R., et al., “Principles and Practice of Refractive Surgery”, Extract from the book and published by W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (USA). Publication year: 1997 (see D67. second page). pp. 185 to 197 and 199 to 209. |
Evidence for the publishing journal and the publication date of Schumacher S., et al., “Investigation of Retinal Damage during Refractive Eye Surgery,” Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 5688, Ophthalmic Technologies XV (2005), pp. 268-277 and publication date Apr. 18, 2005. |
Fankhauser F., et al., “Lasers in Ophthalmology. Basic, Diagnostic and Surgical Aspects, A Review”, Extract from the textbook, published in 2003 (see second page of D13); pp. 79-89. |
Fermann M.E., et al., “Ultrafast Lasers Technology and Applications”, Extract from the book, published by Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York NY (USA). pp. 699 to 743 and 745 to 765. Published in 2003 (see third paqe of D64). |
He L., et al., “Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, Jan. 2011, vol. 22 (1), pp. 43-52. |
L'Esperance Jr., F.A., “Ophthalmie Lasers vol. II”, Extract from the book, Third edition, published in 1989 (see D73, third page), pp. 795 to 802, 832 and 833 and pp. 1028 to 1036. |
Lubatschowki H., “Cataract Surgery, Why Lasers Designed for Corneal Flaps Don't Cut it for Cataracts,” Eurotimes, Apr. 2012, vol. 17 (4), 1 page. |
Pallikaris I.G., et al., “Lasik”, Extract from the book and published by Slack Incorporated, Thorofare, NJ (USA), published in 1998 (see D66, third page) pp. 75 to 78 and 81 to 105. |
Schumacher S., et al., “Investigation of Retinal Damage during Refractive Eye Surgery,” The publishing journal and the publication date are evidenced by document D69 (journal: Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 5688, Ophthalmic Technologies XV (2005), pp. 268-277 [event: SPIE BiOS, 2005, San Jose, CA (USA)]; and publication dateApr. 18, 2005). |
Bethke W., “Femtosecond Lasers Broaden Their Powers,” Review of Ophthalmology, Feb. 2007, pp. 51-52, 54, 56, 58-60. |
Bille J.F., et al., “Principles of Operation and First Clinical Results using the Picosecond IR Laser,” Ophthalmic Technologies II, 1992, vol. 1644, pp. 88-95. |
Choma M., et al., “Sensitivity Advantage of Swept Source and Fourier Domain Optical Coherence Tomography,” Optics Express, 2003, vol. 11(18), pp. 2183-2189. |
Evidence for publication date. |
Henderson B.A., “Essentials of Cataract Surgery,” 2007, pp. 39-61 (Chapters 6, 7). |
Kiraly L., et al.,“[Reduction of Astigmatism by Arcuate Incisions Using the Femtosecond Laser After Corneal Transplantation],” Clinical Monthly Journals for Ophthalmology, 2008, vol. 225(1), pp. 70-74. |
Leitgeb R., et al., “Performance of Fourier Domain Vs. Time Domain Optical Coherence Tomography,” Optics Express, 2003, vol. 11(8), pp. 889-894. |
Summons to Attend Oral Proceedings pursuant to Article 115 (1) EPC mailed Jul. 21, 2022 for European Application No. EP18206444 filed Mar. 13, 2008, 22 pages. |
Tomalla M., Why the Femtosecond Laser, Cataract 4 Refractive Surgery Today Europe Nov./Dec. 2007, pp. 50/51. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210161654 A1 | Jun 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60906944 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12048186 | Mar 2008 | US |
Child | 13569103 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14948192 | Nov 2015 | US |
Child | 17177872 | US | |
Parent | 13569103 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 14948192 | US |