The present invention relates to a method and an apparatus for cutting a sleeve used in paper manufacture as a roll core to a predetermined length.
The core is cut from a long master sleeve/core to a length corresponding to the width of the paper roll. After the cutting, the cores are moved to a winder, where a paper web is reeled onto the cores.
In core cutting, a sawing technique known from circular saws and an slitting technique known from tube cutters are applied. Slitting can be applied in the first place to cut thin-walled cores preferably made from the softest material. This technique has the advantage that the cutting doesn't produce any waste. The present invention relates primarily to cutting by a material-removing technique. In the following, this technique is referred to as a sawing technique and the device applying it as a saw.
Prior art is described e.g. in patent specifications SE 352 013, DE 4021134, DE 3803553 and in patent application FI 925 253.
The prior-art sawing technique has several drawbacks. The cutting accuracy is not sufficient for the requirements of the most demanding applications. After the winder, the rolls in the set of paper rolls are separated from each other e.g. by using a typical array of separating stop gages as described in patent specification FI 97126. If the set consists of a large number of narrow rolls, then the accuracy requirement becomes more pronounced. The cutting inaccuracy of an individual core, which typically is +/−0.5 mm, being repeated from core to core, leads to a situation where a core in the set extends into the adjacent roll by as much as 10 mm. Therefore, the rolls have to be separated from each other manually by wedging.
A central reason for the inaccuracy of the cutting length is the currently used method of determining the length. The core is pushed against a mechanical limit. Even if the mechanical limit is positioned ever so accurately, this will not lead to a corresponding cutting accuracy. The core is rotated during the cutting operation.
Since the core end placed against the mechanical limit is not straight, the deviations of shape cause axial displacement of the core as it is being rotated, and this results in the above-mentioned inaccuracy.
The mechanical limit additionally has to be so constructed that it will work over a wide range of diameters and allow the removal of sawing waste by suction. Therefore, the mechanical limit must not cover the core end entirely.
Dust produced by saws and poor operation of suction systems are common problems associated with prior art. Dust involves a risk of explosion and also a health risk. Efficient dust removal systems are expensive. For safety reasons, dust extraction equipment has to be placed outside the building.
Prior-art solutions also involve drawbacks in the measuring and power transmission techniques, which have an importance regarding the accuracy of longitudinal positioning of the core. Wear of the blade leads to further inaccuracy.
The invention provides a significant improvement in sawing accuracy and dust formation problems.
The amount of uncontrolled saw dust is substantially reduced, because the dust spray can be directed more accurately. No burr is produced, which has an effect on the accuracy.
In more precise terms, the invention is characterized by what is disclosed in the characterization parts of the independent claims.
In the following, the invention will be described in detail with reference to the attached drawings.
In the embodiment presented in
A significant portion 5 is flung in an uncontrolled manner into the environment. One portion 6 remains inside the core. The remaining portion 4 enters inside the blade guard as is desirable. Of these, portions 5 and 6 are very harmful. The inside of the core 1 has to be cleaned before the core is passed on into the further process. The cleaning is performed by applying suction, which does not always guarantee a good final result. Portion 5 of the spray causes environmental problems.
When a short piece is being sawn, even the dust spray hitting the inner surface of the core bounces partly into the environment even if a strong suction prevails inside the core.
The core is rotated until the cut extends around the core. The cut looks clean on the outer surface of the core, but a burr is formed on the inner surface.
The blade 3 is driven through the outer surface of the core but not through the inner surface. The core is preferably rotated through one revolution. As the blade cuts towards the outer surface of the core, the outer surface of the core remains clean/burrless. Since there remains a thin, solid circular surface 7 under the cut, no cutting dust can get inside the core. Practically the entire dust spray 8 is directed to the inside of the blade guard 2.
Next, the direction of rotation of the core 1 is reversed so that the core rotates in the same direction with the blade, preferably counter-clockwise CC. As illustrated in
Due to the reversal of direction, the blade cuts towards the inner surface of the core, and no burr is formed. The entire dust spray 9 is directed to the inside of the blade guard 2 and can be easily recovered.
In a second stage as illustrated in
In both stages, the dust sprays 12, 13 are directed safely to the inside of the blade guard 2. In both machining operations, the blades cut against the surfaces. In this way the dust can be recovered in a controlled manner, and no burr is formed at the cutting surfaces.
The sawing apparatus mainly consists of known devices. The core is rotated by a roller provided with a drive and leaning against the core. The core rests on two parallel rows of rollers 15. Operation is started by first moving the core in the direction of the longitudinal axis through a distance corresponding to the required cutting length and then rotating the core (1) about its longitudinal axis and driving the rotating saw blade through the surface of the core.
In the apparatus of the invention, the distance of longitudinal movement of the core is preferably measured using a band-type measuring element which does not require the use of rotating power transmission.
Instead of using mechanical limits, the core is gripped at its end, inside the core, by a gripping element 14, which then moves the core in the lengthwise direction. The length of the distance of movement of the gripping element is measured by means of a measuring element.
The wear of the blade is either measured or estimated according to exploitation time. The effect of wear is compensated by correcting the determination of positioning. The measuring and positioning elements/system are in themselves known from CNC machine tools and industrial robots. Likewise, the compensation of blade wear is known from adaptive machine tool control systems.
The details of the invention may vary in the scope of the following claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20050080 | Jan 2005 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2006/000020 | 1/23/2006 | WO | 00 | 5/7/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/079680 | 8/3/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1782518 | Steps | Nov 1930 | A |
2467281 | Walter et al. | Apr 1949 | A |
3146655 | Ghisoni | Sep 1964 | A |
3238846 | Spencer et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3474655 | Fulkerson | Oct 1969 | A |
3748934 | Lezberg | Jul 1973 | A |
3933063 | Stoffels | Jan 1976 | A |
3985051 | Brown | Oct 1976 | A |
4084463 | Kanbara | Apr 1978 | A |
4292867 | Stoffels et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4361064 | Sasaki | Nov 1982 | A |
4438672 | Sasaki | Mar 1984 | A |
4693149 | Sireix | Sep 1987 | A |
4713992 | Languillat | Dec 1987 | A |
4794684 | Vanlauwe | Jan 1989 | A |
4827816 | Takaniemi | May 1989 | A |
4889023 | Languillat | Dec 1989 | A |
4934225 | Languillat et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5014924 | Nowisch et al. | May 1991 | A |
5170684 | Lofstrom | Dec 1992 | A |
5313862 | Johansson | May 1994 | A |
5335570 | Ro | Aug 1994 | A |
5555570 | Bay | Sep 1996 | A |
5894771 | Braun et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5964024 | Wallace | Oct 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
7717683 | Sep 1977 | DE |
0 085 248 | Aug 1983 | EP |
0 177 418 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0 826 467 | Mar 1998 | EP |
2 120 591 | May 1983 | GB |
186094 | Jul 1995 | JP |
180536 | Jul 1998 | JP |
525 942 | Mar 2004 | SE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070272062 A1 | Nov 2007 | US |