This invention relates to surface apparatus for processing carbon dioxide (CO2) to be injected into wells for enhanced recovery of crude oil. More particularly, apparatus and method are provided for decreasing flow rate variations (i.e., flow dampening) and supplying high-density carbon dioxide to a well at higher energy efficiency when carbon dioxide gas is sourced from a variable rate or intermittent source.
Injection of carbon dioxide into an oil reservoir to increase the recovery of crude oil from the oil reservoir is a proven technology. It has been practiced for more than 40 years. Carbon dioxide gas is injected into some wells, flows through rock containing crude oil, and is produced from other wells, along with oil and often a large volume of water. Variations of the process include injection of slugs of water with the carbon dioxide to improve sweep efficiency of the carbon dioxide. In some oil reservoirs, additional recovery of oil is primarily the result of the high solubility of carbon dioxide in the oil, which expands the oil phase and decreases the amount of oil left trapped in the rock. Carbon dioxide's effect in lowering the viscosity of crude oil is important in improving oil recovery from some reservoirs. Under other conditions a displacement zone between the crude oil and carbon dioxide may become miscible with the oil and carbon dioxide.
The sources of carbon dioxide currently used for flooding of oil reservoirs are reservoirs containing high purity carbon dioxide and anthropogenic carbon dioxide. Anthropogenic carbon dioxide may be recovered from industrial plants or from power sources. Recently it was announced that carbon dioxide will be recovered from a refinery and used for injection into wells (Dallas Bus. J., May 10, 2013). Recovery of carbon dioxide from a nitrogen plant and planned recovery from an industrial plant are reported in the same source.
Recovery of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere offers an almost limitless supply for injection underground, but the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is low compared with industrial sources. Nevertheless, new processes using the atmosphere, engine exhaust, flue gas or other sources of carbon dioxide are being developed. One such process is described in U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2013/0047664, which discloses removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by a combination of drying with a desiccant, adsorption of carbon dioxide from the dry air, releasing the carbon dioxide from the adsorbent by decreasing pressure to a vacuum and solidifying the carbon dioxide on a cold surface in a vacuum chamber. U.S. Pat. App. Pub, No. 2013/0025317 discloses a process for removing carbon dioxide from a gas stream by de-sublimation, vaporization and liquefaction. U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2011/0252828 discloses a carbon dioxide recovery method using cryo-condensation. U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No. 2013/0025317 discloses an auto-refrigerated process for de-sublimation of a flue gas. Of course, carbon dioxide may be separated from other gases by well-known cryogenic processes (liquefaction, distillation), but they are expensive and not practical as a stand-alone recovery process for carbon dioxide from gases containing low concentrations of carbon dioxide.
The output of carbon dioxide from some of the processes disclosed above and other possible processes varies with time. Output pressure may be low and output rate may be intermittent, as from a batch process, or not at a steady rate, as from any carbon dioxide recovery process that requires regeneration. For use in enhanced oil recovery (EOR) carbon dioxide gas is injected for months or years at pressures usually in the range from 1200 psi to 3000 psi, requiring high compression ratios from a low-pressure source. A steady rate is needed, because conventional methods of pressurization are negatively affected by problems associated with intermittent flow.
Equipment and methods are needed for providing a more energy-efficient method for pressurizing CO2 and providing the fluid at a steady rate from processes that supply carbon dioxide at a varying rate.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) gas from a source at or above the triple-point pressure is cooled by a heat pump to a sub-cooled liquid and sprayed into a surge vessel or accumulator containing two phases. The amount of heat added in a heating coil in the lower part of the accumulator and the temperature of the sub-cooled liquid are controlled by a pressure controller in the accumulator, such that the level of the dense phase in the accumulator moves between two levels (forming an “accumulator volume”), while pressure in the vessel is maintained near constant as dense CO2 is pumped out of the bottom of the accumulator at a constant rate and input rate of CO2 from the source varies with time. The accumulator volume in the accumulator is sized to account for variations in output rate of the particular source. A carbon dioxide pump, with speed controlled by the average flow rate from the source, is used to pump the more dense CO2 phase in the bottom of the accumulator to the pressure needed for injection into wells for enhanced oil recovery or into a pipeline (often in the range from 1200 psi to 3000 psi) or for other uses. Additional cooling may be used immediately upstream of the pump to insure adequate suction pressure and prevent cavitation in the pump. The heat pump process for the two-phase vessel may use a conventional heat pump with propane or other fluids or mixtures of heat pump fluid selected for maximum efficiency.
Referring to
Sub-cooled liquid (below saturation temperature) from heat exchanger 12 passes to accumulator 13, where it flows (preferably as a spray through mister system 13a) into the vapor space. The level of heavier phase carbon dioxide may vary between 13a1 and 13a2, which define the bottom and top of the accumulator volume in accumulator 13. Accumulator volume is selected to accommodate the variations in output rate of source 10. Level controls 13a1 and 13a2 may be used to shut-down an upset condition and/or to adjust to more gradual changes to average flow of source 10. Level controls 13a1 and 13a2, pressure controller 13b, coil 19 and sub-cooled liquid flowing into accumulator 13 are used to maintain the liquid level between level controls 13a1 and 13a2. Pressure controller 13b, which may work in conjunction with temperature controller 12b, controls heat flux of sub-cooled liquid by valve 13b2 and heat flux through coil 19 by valve 13b1. Heat medium fluid or refrigerant enters coil 19 at 16a. The heat flux may be supplied from heat pump 16 or another source, such as a CO2 recovery process using adsorption and desorption (not shown). Pressure controller 13b throttles valve 13b2 such that sub-cooled fluid flowing through mister system 13a cools the vapor in 13, liquefying enough vapor to offset the volume of net positive influx of liquid into accumulator 13. Pressure controller 13b throttles heat flow into the saturated liquid section of accumulator 13 to vaporize sufficient liquid to offset the net negative liquid influx. If there is a net positive flow of CO2 into accumulator 13, pressure is maintained in accumulator 13 by cooling vapor to liquefy a portion of the vapor to offset the reduction of the vapor space volume (rising liquid level). If there is a net negative flow of CO2 into accumulator 13, pressure is maintained by heating the saturated liquid section such that sufficient liquid is vaporized to offset the increase in vapor space volume (falling liquid level).
Pump 15 may be a conventional pump, such as a multistage centrifugal pump. It may be used to pump liquid CO2 to a pipeline or well or other use. The CO2 may be further densified at heat exchanger 14, which may use refrigerant from heat pump 16, ambient air or other means, to increase the Net Positive Suction Head to prevent cavitation or increase efficiency of pump 15. Temperature control is provided at valve 14b, controlled by temperature controller 14a. Further cooling may be provided at heat exchanger 17 to increase the efficiency of a downstream pipeline or injection well. Equipment may be industry-standard. One of the important features of the apparatus described herein is the ability to pump dense or liquid carbon dioxide from the apparatus at a steady rate and without the inefficiency and high cost of compression of gas while avoiding problems of control and wear caused by cycling of the CO2 pump.
Referring to
Although the present invention has been described with respect to specific details, it is not intended that such details should be regarded as limitations on the scope of the invention, except to the extent that they are included in the accompanying claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3191395 | Maher | Jun 1965 | A |
3661483 | Bose | May 1972 | A |
3962881 | Muska | Jun 1976 | A |
4249915 | Sircar et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4593529 | Birochik | Jun 1986 | A |
4593763 | Burke | Jun 1986 | A |
4726815 | Hashimoto et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4742865 | Weitman | May 1988 | A |
4888955 | Tyree | Dec 1989 | A |
5214925 | Hoy | Jun 1993 | A |
5590535 | Rhoades | Jan 1997 | A |
6516626 | Escobar et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6912858 | White | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7654320 | Payton | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7891197 | Winter | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8163070 | Hees et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
20040035148 | Whitlock | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050126188 | Winter | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050268938 | Johnson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060010882 | Oldham | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070051114 | Mahlanen | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20100077752 | Papile | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110100040 | Bush et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110252828 | Lockwood et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20130025317 | Terrien et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130047664 | DiCenzo et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1898125 | Dec 2003 | CN |
101137451 | Jun 2004 | CN |
2005058684 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2007117974 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
SPE Paper 15916-PA; Title “Surface Processing of Carbon Dioxide in EOR Projects”; Aug. 1986; vol. 38, No. 8; Journal of Petroleum Technology. |
SPE Paper 21766-PA; Title “Control of Waste Gas from a Thermal EOR Operation”; Jun. 1991; vol. 43, No. 6; Journal of Petroleum Technology. |
SPE Paper 23564-PA; Title “Carbon Dioxide Flooding”; Apr. 1992; vol. 44, No. 4; Journal of Petroleum Technology. |
SPE Paper 22022-PA; Title “An Approach to Optimize Economics in a West Texas CO2 Flood”; vol. 44, No. 9; Journal of Petroleum Technology. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 14, 2014; pp. 1-7. |
Chinese office action and translation for Chinese application No. 201480052413.2 dated Dec. 27, 2016. |
2nd Chinese Office Action and English Translation for Application No. 201480052413.2 dated Oct. 16, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150027682 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |