Patent Application
20120031148
The present invention relates to a method for detecting accidental stops of the yarn on a knitting line and to an apparatus for carrying out the method.
As known, the knitting lines typically comprise a plurality of yarn feeders each provided with a stationary drum on which a motorized flywheel winds a plurality of yarn loops forming a weft stock. Upon request from a downstream machine, typically a circular/rectilinear knitting machine of a conventional type, the loops are unwound from the drum, then pass through a weft-braking device which controls the tension of the yarn, and finally are fed to the machine.
The yarn feeders of the above type are well-known to the person skilled in the art and have the main scope of maintaining the amount of yarn stored on the drum substantially constant irrespective of the yarn-drawing speed of the machine, while minimizing the tension of the unwinding yarn. To this purpose, the yarn feeder is provided with various sensors, one of which is a loop count sensor, such as an optical sensor, a piezoelectric sensor, and the like, which generates at least one pulse per each unwound loop. This sensor cooperates with the other sensors to optimize the yarn-winding speed of the flywheel, in such a way as to stabilize the amount of yarn stored on the drum.
In the conventional systems, another sensor is arranged between the feeder and the knitting machine for detecting any accidental stops of the yarn, which circumstance may occur in case of breaking of the yarn or unhooking of the yarn from the needles of the machine. In these cases, the control unit stops the machine in order to safeguard the finished article from defects and to prevent the weft tube of the article under processing from detaching, which circumstance, as known, requires a laborious, time-consuming operation of re-inserting all the yarns forming the article into the machine.
As known, the above yarn-breaking sensors may be either mechanical or electronic.
The mechanical sensors have the advantage of being less expensive, but they are also less effective in terms of quickness of response; moreover, they are provided with a sensing arm which grazes the yarn in operation, thereby interfering with the yarn-feeding tension and consequently affecting the accuracy of the tension control system.
The electronic sensors have the advantage of being more effective in terms of quickness of response and, in operation, they do not interfere with the tension of the unwinding yarn because the motion of the yarn is detected by a photoelectric sensor. However, the electronic sensors are very expensive and they require the installation and wiring of an additional supplying/communication circuit, with consequent rise both in costs and in the complexity of the detecting system.
EP-A-200945262 of Applicant describes a method for detecting the stop of the yarn which, in lieu of dedicated breaking sensors, employs the signal generated by the loop count sensor already coupled to the feeder. With the above described method, the interval between the pulses generated by the loop count sensor is compared with a threshold interval which is continuously updated as a function of the changes of the yarn-drawing speed of the downstream machine. When the interval between two pulses exceeds the threshold interval, the system interprets the event as anomalous and stops the machine.
The method described in the above-cited prior document is suitable for those knitting lines in which the yarn is drawn continuously, i.e., the operation of the feeders is never interrupted while forming the pattern. When, on the contrary, the feeders have a discontinuous operation, i.e., they are subjected to stops and restarts, which are typically controlled by respective selectors driven by a cam associated to the rotor of the machine, the above-described method is not suitable because it is not capable of distinguishing any accidental stops from the controlled stops. Typically, knitting lines employing large-in-diameter, so-called “striper” machines, or small-in-diameter, so-called “seamless” machines, or machines for socks, have a discontinuous operation.
Therefore, it is a main object of the present invention to provide a method for detecting accidental stops of the yarn which does not employ dedicated sensors and may also be used in knitting lines in which the feeders have a discontinuous operation while forming the pattern, as well as an apparatus for carrying out the method.
The above object and other advantages, which will better appear from the following description, are achieved by the method and the apparatus having the features recited in claims 1 and 9 respectively, while the dependent claims state other advantageous, though secondary, features of the invention.
The invention will be now described in more detail with reference to a preferred, non-exclusive embodiment, shown by way of non-limiting example in the attached drawings, wherein:
In
Each feeder comprises a stationary drum 12 and a flywheel 14 driven by a motor 15, which draws yarn F from a reel 16 and winds it on drum 12 in form of loops forming a weft stock. Upon request from knitting machine KM, the yarn is unwound from drum 12 and is fed to the machine.
The amount of yarn stored on drum 12 is controlled by a triad of sensors. A first sensor S1, typically a Hall sensor, is used to calculate the amount of yarn wound on the drum, as well as the winding speed, by detecting the passing of magnets such as N coupled to flywheel 14. A second sensor S2, preferably a mechanical sensor, provides a binary information indicative of the presence or absence of a minimum amount of stock on an intermediate area of drum 12. A third sensor S3, preferably an optical sensor, generates a pulse UWP per each loop unwound from the drum.
A weft-braking device 20 is arranged downstream of yarn-feeder An and is controlled by a control unit CU that is programmed to control the tension of the yarn unwinding from drum 12 in order to maintain it substantially constant. To this purpose, a tension sensor 22, which is arranged downstream of weft-braking device 20, measures the tension of yarn Fn unwinding from the drum and generates a corresponding measured tension signal T_meas. Of course, the weft-braking devices and the tension sensors of those feeders which are only represented by circular blocks in
In order to detect any accidental stop of the yarn, the above-described apparatus employs a method which does not require dedicated sensors because it uses the pulse signals UWP generated by third sensor S3.
In particular, as mentioned above, during its normal operation the feeder receives a pulse UWP from sensor S3 per each loop unwound from drum 12. As well known to the person skilled in the art, the yarn-drawing speed is substantially constant at a certain operating speed of the downstream machine, so that these pulses are substantially equally-spaced over time, i.e., the time intervals between successive pulses may only vary of negligible amounts. Accordingly, the method according to the invention is based on the principle that, when the delay from the last pulse is considerably longer than the average time interval between two pulses, it means that the yarn has accidentally stopped, because the yarn has broken or unhooked from the needles of machine KM.
With the method according to the invention, master unit M transmits the following signals on bus 30, as shown in
The preliminary tuning operation comprises the following steps:
MWT0=MUT0*K,
wherein K is a constant preferably in the range 2 to 4, and
Once performed the above tuning operation, the method according to the invention, which is enabled only when machine KM is operative, comprises the following steps:
MWT=MWT0*SPD0/SPD,
wherein MWT is the updated threshold interval and SPD is the machine speed updated in real time,
Average time interval MUT0 between two successive pulses at the nominal operative speed SPD0 is advantageously calculated as arithmetic mean of the last m intervals UT1, UT2, . . . , UTm, wherein m is preferably in the range 3 to 5.
With the machine at rest, the value of SPD is equal to 0 and the control unit disables the detecting method; this circumstance corresponds to set threshold time interval MWT to infinity.
The average time interval between two successive pulses is only calculated during the tuning operation and the threshold time interval is directly updated as a function of the operative speed of the machine, from which the yarn-drawing speed depends.
Of course, the above-cited measuring/computing operations are performed by the control units of the selected feeders on the basis of the pulse signals received by loop count sensor S3. The programming of the control units falls within the normal knowledge of the person skilled in the art and, therefore, will not be further described.
If it is not possible to derive feeder selection signal SEL_ON/OFF directly from the machine, which signal, as mentioned, changes as a function of the angular position of the machine, the above-described method advantageously comprises a preliminary learning procedure, in which machine KM generates a sample pattern. While the sample pattern is generated, the changes of state of selection of the single feeders are stored in master unit M and are used in the following cycles to generate feeder selection signals SEL_ON/OFF, which are synchronized on the basis of position signal M_POS received by master unit M from machine KM.
As mentioned above, feeders A1, A2, . . . , An are controlled by respective selectors Z1, Z2, . . . , Zn which, in turn, are driven by a cam coupled to the rotor of machine KM.
With reference to
At the beginning of the pattern, machine KM sends a signal Patt_start (
Once overcome angular position pos2, master unit M transmits a request message req_02—i to the next three feeders of the second group, and receives response messages resp_04—i, resp_05—i e resp_06—i containing the data about the number of detected pulses ns_04—i, ns_05—i e ns_06—i.
The above operations are then repeated until the last, g-th group (position posg, request req_g_i, etc.).
During the next revolution i+1, master unit M repeats the same operations and compares the number of loops unwound from each feeder up to the current revolution, i+1, with the number of loops unwound up to the previous revolution, i. The state of selection of the c-th feeder is evaluated on the basis that, if ns_c_i+1>ns_c_i, than the c-th feeder has been selected during the i-th revolution, otherwise, it has not been selected.
This procedure continues until machine KM generates a signal Patt_stop (
As mentioned above, the selection data stored in master unit M are used during the normal operation of the machine to generate feeder selection signals SEL_ON/OFF, which are synchronized on the basis of the angular position signal M_POS that master module M receives from machine KM.
Each feeder, during the learning procedure, advantageously also calculates the average yarn-unwinding speed.
To this purpose, e.g., with reference to the first feeder, the number of pulses at revolution i+1, ns_01—i+1, is compared with the number of pulses at the previous revolution i, ns_01—i, and if the former is higher than the latter (i.e., during that revolution a consumption of yarn has occurred), the average loop unwinding time is calculated as
Tm=(ns—01—i+1−ns—01—i)/(t01—i+1−t01—i),
wherein t01—i is the time instant when request message req_01—i inquiring about the number of loops unwound from the first feeder at the i-th revolution is received, and t01—i+1 is the time instant when request message req_01—i+1 inquiring about the number of loops unwound from the first feeder at the i+1-th revolution is received.
Alternatively, in order to further reduce the risks of false measurements, the feeder could calculate the average time over a number of revolutions in which it is selected.
The sequence of messages transmitted on the bus during the normal operation of the machine is shown in
As shown in
A few preferred embodiments of the invention have been described herein, but of course many changes may be made by a person skilled in the art within the scope of the claims. In particular, although only one sensor S3 is present in the above-described preferred embodiments, whereby only one pulse is generated per each loop unwound from the drum, the invention is similarly applicable in the case that a plurality of equally-spaced sensors are provided, whereby a plurality of pulses are generated per each loop unwound from the drum.
The disclosures in EPA 10425268.9 from which this application claims priority are incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 425 268.9 | Aug 2010 | EP | regional |
