This patent application pertains to methods and apparatus for cardiac rhythm management. In particular, it relates to the detections of oscillations in heart rhythm and its use by a cardiac rhythm management device.
Cardiac rhythm refers to the temporal pattern of electrical or mechanical activity in the heart. Cardiac rhythm management devices are implantable devices that provide electrical stimulation to selected chambers of the heart in order to treat disorders of cardiac rhythm. An implantable pacemaker, for example, is a cardiac rhythm management device that paces the heart with timed pacing pulses. The most common condition for which pacemakers are used is in the treatment of bradycardia, where the ventricular rate is too slow. Atrio-ventricular conduction defects (i.e., AV block) that are permanent or intermittent and sick sinus syndrome represent the most common causes of bradycardia for which permanent pacing may be indicated. If functioning properly, the pacemaker makes up for the heart's inability to pace itself at an appropriate rhythm in order to meet metabolic demand by enforcing a minimum heart rate. Cardiac rhythm management devices may also be used to treat tachyarrhythmias where the heart rhythm is too fast. In a type of pacing therapy called anti-tachycardia pacing, one or more pacing pulses are output during a cardiac cycle in an effort to interrupt the reentrant circuit causing a tachycardia. Other tachyarrhythmias, such as fibrillation, can be treated by devices that deliver a cardioversion/defibrillation shock when the tachyarrhythmia is detected.
Also included within the concept of cardiac rhythm is the manner and degree to which the heart chambers contract during a cardiac cycle to result in the efficient pumping of blood. For example, the heart pumps more effectively when the chambers contract in a coordinated manner. The heart has specialized conduction pathways in both the atria and the ventricles that enable the rapid conduction of excitation (i.e., depolarization) throughout the myocardium. These pathways conduct excitatory impulses from the sino-atrial node to the atrial myocardium, to the atrio-ventricular node, and thence to the ventricular myocardium to result in a coordinated contraction of both atria and both ventricles. This both synchronizes the contractions of the muscle fibers of each chamber and synchronizes the contraction of each atrium or ventricle with the contralateral atrium or ventricle. Without the synchronization afforded by the normally functioning specialized conduction pathways, the heart's pumping efficiency is greatly diminished. Patients who exhibit pathology of these conduction pathways, such as bundle branch blocks, can thus suffer compromised cardiac output.
Heart failure refers to a clinical syndrome in which an abnormality of cardiac function causes a below normal cardiac output that can fall below a level adequate to meet the metabolic demand of peripheral tissues. It usually presents as congestive heart failure (CHF) due to the accompanying venous and pulmonary congestion. Heart failure can be due to a variety of etiologies with ischemic heart disease being the most common. Some heart failure patients suffer from some degree of AV block or are chronotropically deficient such that their cardiac output can be improved with conventional bradycardia pacing. Such pacing, however, may result in some degree of discoordination in atrial and/or ventricular contractions because pacing excitation from a single pacing site spreads throughout the myocardium via the conducting muscle fibers of either the atria or the ventricles, and not the faster specialized conduction pathways as in a physiological heart beat. Most pacemaker patients can still maintain more than adequate cardiac output with artificial pacing, but the diminishment in cardiac output may be significant in a heart failure patient whose cardiac output is already compromised. Intraventricular and/or interventricular conduction defects are also commonly found in heart failure patients and can contribute to cardiac dysfunction by causing unsynchronized contractions during intrinsic beats. In order to treat these problems, cardiac rhythm management devices have been developed that provide electrical pacing stimulation to one or more heart chambers in an attempt to improve the coordination of atrial and/or ventricular contractions, termed cardiac resynchronization therapy.
The present invention relates to an implantable cardiac rhythm management device that is configured to detect oscillatory behavior in the rhythm of the heart as reflected by alternations in the measured amplitudes of heart sounds, referred to herein as acoustic alternans. Acoustic alternans is indicative of alternations in the strength of systolic contractions and pulse pressure, a condition known as pulsus alternans. Pulsus altenans is generally taken by clinicians to indicate systolic dysfunction and possible heart failure. A cardiac rhythm management device may therefore also be configured to compensate for the decrease in cardiac output when acoustic altemans is detected by initiating or modifying the delivery of cardiac resychronization therapy. Pulsus alternans is also highly correlated with oscillations in the electrical activity of the heart, called electrical alternans. Since electrical alternans is known to be potentially arrhythmogenic, the device may be further configured to adjust its operation when the condition is detected to deal with this situation. Such operational adjustments may relate to the manner in which either bradycardia pacing or anti-tachycardia pacing is delivered.
Under certain conditions, some individuals exhibit oscillations in the mechanical function of the heart that result in alternations in pulse pressure, referred to as pulsus alternans. Pulsus alternans is generally taken by clinicians to indicate systolic dysfunction, particularly in the left ventricle. It would be useful for an implanted cardiac rhythm management device to be able to detect this condition when it arises so that the presence of the condition can be communicated to a clinician and, as explained below, so that the operating behavior of the device can be adjusted appropriately. Direct detection of blood pressure by an implantable device, however, is problematic. The present invention provides a method for detecting pulsus alternans by using alternations in the amplitudes of measured heart sounds, referred to herein as acoustic alternans, as a surrogate.
Pulsus alternans occurs due to a difference in the strength of systolic contractions during successive heart beats so that a strong beats alternate with weak beats. As explained below, the strength of a systolic contraction affects the velocity at which the AV and semilunar valves close, which closures are responsible for producing the first and second heart sounds, S1 and S2, heard during cardiac auscultation. Thus, alternating loud and soft heart sounds, or acoustic alternans, is directly reflective of pulsus alternans. Heart sounds may be detected and measured by an implantable device equipped with an accelerometer that responds to the acoustic vibrations transmitted through body fluids. Accelerometers are commonly used in pacemakers to measure the physical activity of the patient so that the pacing rate can be adjusted accordingly. By detecting and measuring the amplitudes of heart sounds during successive heart beats, acoustic alternans can be detected.
As noted above, certain cardiac rhythm management devices are designed to deliver pacing therapy in a manner that improves the coordination of both ventricles (or both atria) during systolic contractions, termed cardiac resynchronization therapy. The presence of pulsus alternans in such patients indicates that systolic function has been further impaired, and it may be beneficial for a device configurable for delivering resynchronization pacing to adjust its operating parameters to compensate for this when acoustic alternans, serving as a surrogate for pulsus alternans, is detected. For example, a device may be configured to deliver bradycardia pacing to one ventricle in a conventional manner or even no pacing under normal conditions. If acoustic alternans is detected, however, the device may be programmed to initiate resynchronization therapy by, for example, pacing both ventricles or one ventricle at multiple sites. In another embodiment, a device configured to deliver resynchronization pacing during normal conditions may adjust one or more operating parameters when acoustic alternans is detected so that the resynchronization pacing is modified. Examples of operating parameters that may be so adjusted are the biventricular delay interval between paces delivered to the right and left ventricles and the atrio-ventricular delay interval between an atrial pace or intrinsic sense and a subsequent ventricular pace.
The pattern of electrical excitation of the human heart may also exhibit oscillations during successive heart beats. This phenomena is referred to as electrical alternans and is usually indicative of a pathological state in which potentially dangerous cardiac arrhythmias are more likely to occur. Since the pumping action of the heart is due to the electromechanical coupling between electrical depolarization of myocardial cells and their mechanical contraction, electrical alternans and pulsus alternans may be different manifestations of the same underlying phenomena in certain cases. In any event, detection of acoustic alternans means that it is highly probable that electrical alternans is also present. Since the presence of electrical alternans in an individual may indicate that an arrhythmogenic condition exists, it may be deleterious for an implantable cardiac rhythm management device to deliver its therapy to the patient in a normal manner under such circumstances. In accordance with the invention, an implantable cardiac rhythm management device that detects acoustic alternans in the manner described above is also configured to adjust its operating behavior when alternans is detected. Such a device may deliver any kind of cardiac rhythm management therapy to the patient during normal conditions including bradycardia pacing, anti-tachycardia pacing, and/or cardioversion/defibrillation. Since it is known that electrical alternans occurs above a critical threshold heart rate, for example, bradycardia pacing at a rate above that critical threshold when electrical alternans is present may aggravate the situation. In one embodiment, a device configured to deliver bradycardia pacing adjusts its pacing rate to a lower value when acoustic alternans is detected. Rapid heart rates may also more readily trigger arrhythmias when an arrhythmogenic condition is present. In another embodiment, a device configured to deliver anti-tachycardia pacing lowers the threshold heart rate at which such therapy is initiated when acoustic alternans is detected in order to reduce the probability of an arrhythmia occurring.
1. Exemplary Hardware Platform
Cardiac rhythm management devices are usually implanted subcutaneously or submuscularly on a patient's chest and have leads threaded intravenously into the heart to connect the device to electrodes used for sensing and pacing. Leads may also be positioned on the epicardium by various means. A block diagram of a multi-site pacemaker having three sensing/pacing channels is shown in
The multiple sensing/pacing channels may be configured to deliver bradycardia pacing, cardiac resynchronization therapy, or anti-tachycardia pacing. Illustrated in
The controller 10 controls the overall operation of the device in accordance with programmed instructions stored in memory, including controlling the delivery of paces via the pacing channels, interpreting sense signals received from the sensing channels, and implementing timers for defining escape intervals and sensory refractory periods. The sensing circuitry of the pacemaker detects a chamber sense, either an atrial sense or ventricular sense, when an electrogram signal (i.e., a voltage sensed by an electrode representing cardiac electrical activity) generated by a particular channel exceeds a specified detection threshold. Pacing algorithms used in particular pacing modes employ such senses to trigger or inhibit pacing. The time intervals between such senses can also be measured in order to detect tachyarrhythmias so that appropriate therapy can be delivered by the device. As described below, the controller may also be programmed to detect acoustic alternans and to adjust the manner in which pacing therapy is delivered by the device upon such detection. In one embodiment, the controller is programmed to detect acoustic alternans when the measured oscillations exceed a specified magnitude and to adjust the operating behavior of the device when acoustic alternans is detected.
2. Detection of Acoustic Alternans
When the heart beats, closure of valves brought about by pressure differentials in the heart are associated with audible heart sounds that can be heard by auscultation with a stethoscope. The first heart sound, designated S1, results when the AV valves (the mitral and tricuspid valves) close at the beginning of systole as the ventricular contraction causes a sudden backflow of blood toward the atria and against the valves. Due to the elastic nature of the valves, the movement of blood toward the atria causes the valves to bulge toward the atria and then recoil blood back toward the ventricle. This causes a period of reverberation that results in vibrations being transmitted through the blood and body tissues. The second heart sound, designated S2, similarly results when the semilunar valves (the aortic and pulmonary valves) close at the end of systole as the ventricular pressure drops. Because right-sided pressures are significantly lower than left-sided pressures, the amplitude of the heart sounds are primarily due to the closure of the mitral and aortic valves. During pulsus alternans, the strength of systolic contractions is alternately strong and weak. During a strong contraction, the mitral valve is stretched farther into the atria which then sets up a larger amplitude period of vibration. A stronger systolic contraction also causes an increased rate of pressure increase in the ventricle or dp/dt which may increase blood flow velocity. Thus the measured amplitude of both S1 and S2 would be expected to exhibit oscillatory behavior during pulsus alternans.
In order to detect acoustic alternans with specificity, specified threshold values may be employed so that the magnitude of the beat-to-beat oscillation must be above a certain value and must persist for a certain number of heart beats or period of time before acoustic alternans is detected.
3. Adjustment of Bradycardia Pacing Rate
Bradycardia pacing modes refer to pacing algorithms used to pace the atria and/or ventricles when the intrinsic atrial and/or ventricular rate is inadequate due to, for example, AV conduction blocks or sinus node dysfunction. Such modes may either be single-chamber pacing, where either an atrium or a ventricle is paced, or dual-chamber pacing in which both an atrium and a ventricle are paced. Modern pacemakers are typically programmable so that they can operate in any mode which the physical configuration of the device will allow. Additional sensing of physiological data allows some pacemakers to change the rate at which they pace the heart in accordance with some parameter correlated to metabolic demand, called rate-adaptive pacing. Measurement of minute ventilation or body activity can be used to estimate metabolic demand for this purpose.
Pacemakers can enforce a minimum heart rate either asynchronously or synchronously. In asynchronous pacing, the heart is paced at a fixed rate irrespective of intrinsic cardiac activity. There is thus a risk with asynchronous pacing that a pacing pulse will be delivered coincident with an intrinsic beat and during the heart's vulnerable period which may cause fibrillation. Most pacemakers for treating bradycardia today are therefore programmed to operate synchronously in a so-called demand mode where sensed cardiac events occurring within a defined interval either trigger or inhibit a pacing pulse. Inhibited demand pacing modes utilize escape intervals to control pacing in accordance with sensed intrinsic activity. In an inhibited demand mode, a pacing pulse is delivered to a heart chamber during a cardiac cycle only after expiration of a defined escape interval during which no intrinsic beat by the chamber is detected. If an intrinsic beat occurs during this interval, the heart is thus allowed to “escape” from pacing by the pacemaker. Such an escape interval can be defined for each paced chamber. For example, a ventricular escape interval can be defined between ventricular events so as to be restarted with each ventricular sense or pace. The inverse of this escape interval is the minimum rate at which the pacemaker will allow the ventricles to beat, sometimes referred to as the lower rate limit (LRL).
In atrial tracking and/or atrio-ventricular sequential pacing, another ventricular escape interval is defined between atrial and ventricular events, referred to as the atrio-ventricular interval (AVI). The atrio-ventricular interval is triggered by an atrial sense or pace and stopped by a ventricular sense or pace. A ventricular pace is delivered upon expiration of the atrio-ventricular interval if no ventricular sense occurs before. Atrial-tracking ventricular pacing and atrio-ventricular sequential pacing attempt to maintain the atrio-ventricular synchrony occurring with physiological beats whereby atrial contractions augment diastolic filling of the ventricles. If a patient has a physiologically normal atrial rhythm, atrial-tracking pacing also allows the ventricular pacing rate to be responsive to the metabolic needs of the body. A pacemaker can also be configured to pace the atria on an inhibited demand basis, where an atrial escape interval is then defined as the maximum time interval in which an atrial sense must be detected after a ventricular sense or pace before an atrial pace will be delivered. The LRL in that case is the sum of the atrial escape interval and the AVI.
Rate-adaptive algorithms may be used in conjunction with bradycardia pacing modes. Rate-adaptive pacemakers modulate the ventricular and/or atrial escape intervals based upon measurements corresponding to physical activity. Such pacemakers are applicable to situations in which intrinsic atrial rates are unreliable or pathological. In a rate-adaptive pacemaker, for example, the LRL is adjusted in accordance with exertion level measurements such as from an accelerometer or minute ventilation sensor in order for the heart rate to more nearly match metabolic demand. The adjusted LRL is then termed the sensor-indicated rate.
Mechcanical alternans is indicative of electrical alternans which is known to occur only above a certain critical threshold heart rate that varies with the individual patient. A pacemaker operating in an inhibited demand mode, by enforcing a specified minimum heart rate, can be responsible in some cases for maintaining a heart rate that allows electrical alternans to occur. The controller may therefore be programmed to decrease the LRL by a specified amount upon detection of acoustic alternans. In the case of rate-adaptive pacing, the maximum sensor-indicated rate and/or the rate-response curve used to map an exertion level to a sensor-indicated rate may be adjusted to also result in a decreased LRL. Such a decrease in the LRL may be beneficial even if the alternans persists by making the triggering of an arrhythmia less likely.
4. Adjustment of Anti-tachycardia Pacing
The cardiac rhythm management device of
The device delivers ATP therapy or a defibrillation shock under programmed control of the microprocessor in response to sensed activity from the sensing channels. A sensing routine analyzes the electrical activity received from the sensing channels in order to detect a tachyarrhythmia, and the tachyarrhythmia is then classified as a tachycardia (i.e., a terminable tachyarrhythmia) or fibrillation based upon rate and/or other criteria. The device detects a ventricular tachyarrhythmia, for example, by counting ventricular senses received via the ventricular sensing channel in order to measure the heart rate and determine whether the rate exceeds a selected threshold value. Once a tachyarrhythmia is detected, the rhythm is classified into either a tachycardia or a fibrillation zone by comparing the heart rate to a fibrillation rate boundary or by other means such as assessing the stability of the rhythm. If the tachyarrhythmia is classified as terminable, a pacing routine executed by the microprocessor delivers ATP pulses in accordance with the parameters of a selected protocol.
As noted above, the object of anti-tachycardia pacing is to create a pace-induced wavefront that propagates into the re-entrant circuit of the tachycardia and extinguishes it. Different protocols are apt to be more successful than others in terminating particular tachyarrhythmias that may differ as to rate and/or depolarization pattern. For this reason, modern cardiac rhythm management devices are capable of employing a number of different ATP protocols to deliver therapy where pacing parameters affecting the magnitude and timing of the pulses can also be adjusted for each protocol. Ideally, a clinician would program the device to deliver pacing therapy using a protocol and parameters that will perform best for a particular patient's tachyarrhythmia.
Upon detection of acoustic alternans, the controller may be programmed to adjust the manner in which anti-tachycardia pacing is delivered that takes account of the greater potential for onset of an arrhythmic episode. In one example, the tachyarrhythmia rate threshold at which anti-tachycardia pacing is initiated is decreased so that the anti-tachycardia therapy is delivered sooner than in a normal mode of operation. Clinical testing of an individual patient may also reveal that certain anti-tachycardia pacing protocols are more successful than others in terminating a tachycardia preceded by acoustic alternans but less successful in terminating a tachyeardia not preceded by acoustic alternans. In those cases, the controller can be programmed to adjust the particular anti-tachycardia pacing protocol to be used for terminating a tachycardia and/or particular parameters defining that protocol when acoustic alternans is detected.
5. Adjustment of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
Cardiac resynchronization therapy is pacing stimulation applied to one or more heart chambers in a manner that restores or maintains synchronized contractions of the atria and/or ventricles and thereby improves pumping efficiency. Certain patients with conduction abnormalities may experience improved cardiac synchronization with conventional single-chamber or dual-chamber pacing as described above. For example, a patient with left bundle branch block may have a more coordinated contraction of the ventricles with a pace than as a result of an intrinsic contraction. Resynchronization pacing, however, may also involve delivering paces to multiple sites of a heart chamber or pacing both ventricles and/or both atria in accordance with a resynchronization pacing mode as described below. Ventricular resynchronization pacing is useful in treating heart failure because, although not directly inotropic, resynchronization results in a more coordinated contraction of the ventricles with improved pumping efficiency and increased cardiac output. Resynchronization pacing of the atria may also be beneficial in certain heart failure patients, particularly for preventing the onset of atrial arrhythmias.
One way to deliver resynchronization therapy is to pace a site with a synchronous bradycardia pacing mode and then deliver one or more resynchronization paces to one or more additional pacing sites in a defined time relation to one or more selected sensing and pacing events that either reset escape intervals or trigger paces in the bradycardia pacing mode. One such resynchronization pacing mode may be termed offset resynchronization pacing. In this mode, a first site is paced with a bradycardia mode, and a second site receives a resynchronization pace at an offset interval with respect to the pace delivered to the first site. The offset interval may be zero in order to pace both sites simultaneously, positive in order to pace the first site after the second, or negative to pace the first site before the second. For example, in biventricular resynchronization pacing, one ventricle is paced with a bradycardia mode while the contralateral ventricle receives resynchronization paces at the specified biventricular offset interval. The offset interval would normally be individually specified to optimize cardiac output in a particular patient. Ventricular resynchronization can also be achieved in certain patients by pacing at a single unconventional site, such as the left ventricle instead of the right ventricle. In such a mode, right ventricular senses may be used to trigger left ventricular paces or used to define an escape interval that upon expiration causes delivery of a left ventricular pace.
Cardiac rhythm management devices for delivering resynchronization therapy may be configured in a number of different ways and with a number of different parameter settings. These parameters can be initially programmed after implantation while a physician is monitoring the patient so that the resynchronization therapy is delivered optimally. When the pumping efficiency of the patient's heart deteriorates as may be indicated by detection of an oscillatory rhythm, however, modification of those parameters may be necessary for continued optimal treatment. Accordingly, the controller may be programmed to modify its resynchronization pacing parameters upon detection of acoustic alternans, with the exact manner in which such parameters are modified depending upon the individual patient's condition. Such parameter modifications may result in, for example, initiation of resynchronization pacing when such pacing is not normally delivered by the device, reconfiguration of pacing sites so that different cardiac sites are paced, adjustment of a biventricular offset interval for biventricular pacing modes, and adjustment of the atrio-ventricular interval for resynchronization pacing modes that employ atrial tracking or atrio-ventricular sequential pacing.
Although the invention has been described in conjunction with the foregoing specific embodiments, many alternatives, variations, and modifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such alternatives, variations, and modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the following appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4291699 | Geddes et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4674518 | Salo | Jun 1987 | A |
4686987 | Salo et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4712179 | Heimer | Dec 1987 | A |
4777960 | Berger et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4802491 | Cohen et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4809697 | Causey, III et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4825869 | Sasmor et al. | May 1989 | A |
4928688 | Mower | May 1990 | A |
4981139 | Pfohl | Jan 1991 | A |
5010889 | Bredesen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5012815 | Bennett, Jr. et al. | May 1991 | A |
5097831 | Lekholm | Mar 1992 | A |
5113869 | Nappholz et al. | May 1992 | A |
5137019 | Pederson et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5174289 | Cohen | Dec 1992 | A |
5179947 | Meyerson et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5190035 | Salo et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5226413 | Bennett et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5251626 | Nickolls et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5265617 | Verrier et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5282838 | Hauser et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5284136 | Hauck et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5292341 | Snell | Mar 1994 | A |
5321618 | Gessman | Jun 1994 | A |
5334222 | Salo et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5368040 | Carney et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5372607 | Stone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5391190 | Pederson et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5417717 | Salo et al. | May 1995 | A |
5421830 | Epstein et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5487752 | Salo et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5540727 | Tockman et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5549654 | Powell | Aug 1996 | A |
5554177 | Kieval et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5564434 | Halperin et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5584868 | Salo et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594638 | Iliff | Jan 1997 | A |
5607460 | Kroll et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5630835 | Brownlee | May 1997 | A |
5674256 | Carlson | Oct 1997 | A |
5690690 | Nappholz et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5700283 | Salo | Dec 1997 | A |
5713367 | Arnold et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716382 | Snell | Feb 1998 | A |
5720771 | Snell | Feb 1998 | A |
5722999 | Snell | Mar 1998 | A |
5724985 | Snell et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5749900 | Schroeppel et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759199 | Snell et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5792195 | Carlson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5800473 | Faisandier | Sep 1998 | A |
5824029 | Weijand et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5833623 | Mann et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836974 | Christini et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836987 | Baumann et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5860918 | Schradi et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5882312 | Gopakumaran et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891178 | Mann et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5904708 | Goedeke | May 1999 | A |
5919210 | Lurie et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921940 | Verrier et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5935081 | Kadhiresan | Aug 1999 | A |
6015388 | Sackner et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016442 | Hsu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6022322 | Prutchi | Feb 2000 | A |
6026324 | Carlson | Feb 2000 | A |
6035233 | Schroeppel et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044298 | Salo et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044299 | Nilsson | Mar 2000 | A |
6058328 | Levine et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058329 | Salo et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070101 | Struble et al. | May 2000 | A |
6091990 | Hsu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6144880 | Ding et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161042 | Hartley et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6168563 | Brown | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190324 | Kieval et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6193668 | Chassaing et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6224553 | Nevo | May 2001 | B1 |
6240317 | Villaseca et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6253107 | Albrecht et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6272377 | Sweeney et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275727 | Hopper et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278894 | Salo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280409 | Stone et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285898 | Ben-Haim | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292694 | Schloss et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6304773 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6336903 | Bardy | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351673 | Ding et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351675 | Tholen et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360127 | Ding et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6361522 | Scheiner et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366811 | Carlson | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6368284 | Bardy | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370424 | Prutchi | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383136 | Jordan | May 2002 | B1 |
6398728 | Bardy | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409675 | Turcott | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411840 | Bardy | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411847 | Mower | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438407 | Ousdigian et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438408 | Mulligan et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440066 | Bardy | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442433 | Linberg | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453191 | Krishnamachari | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454707 | Casscells, III et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6477406 | Turcott | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6478746 | Chassaing et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480733 | Turcott | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6491639 | Turcott | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6520924 | Lee | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6527729 | Turcott | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542775 | Ding et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
RE38119 | Mower | May 2003 | E |
6626842 | Oka | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643548 | Mai et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6650940 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6684103 | Ding et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6915157 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6957105 | Pastore et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
20010007053 | Bardy | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010012955 | Goedeke et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010047125 | Quy | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020016550 | Sweeney et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019586 | Teller et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026103 | Norris et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026223 | Riff et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020123672 | Christophersom et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020151938 | Corbucci | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030023278 | Pastore et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055461 | Girouard et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030105496 | Yu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030153952 | Auricchio et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030171791 | KenKnight et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030187482 | Pastore et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030233132 | Pastore et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040054381 | Pastore et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073093 | Hatlestad | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040093034 | Girouard et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098057 | Pastore | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106960 | Siejko et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040106961 | Siejko et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122484 | Hatlestad et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040127792 | Siejko et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050256542 | Pastore et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060020294 | Brockway et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
297675 | Jan 1989 | EP |
709058 | May 1996 | EP |
WO-9725098 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO-0004947 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0041765 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-0041766 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-0103575 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO-0108748 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO-0124876 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO-0130436 | May 2001 | WO |
WO-0156651 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO-0167948 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-2005122902 | Dec 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030208240 A1 | Nov 2003 | US |