The invention relates to mail processing, in particular, to a method and apparatus for capturing a composite image of flat and letter mail pieces and using the image to recognize doubles (overlapped mail pieces) in a stream of singulated mail pieces.
In many automated mail sorting systems, stacks of flat mail pieces such as letters or flats are singulated by a feeder that advances the stack against a pickoff belt, which pickoff belt feeds individual mail pieces from the end of the stack to an opposed belt conveyor. One such feeder is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,679,491 issued Jan. 20, 2004 to Luebben et al., the contents of which are incorporated herein for all purposes. The singulated stream of mail pieces is conveyed past a scanner such as an OCR (optical character reader) or bar code reader (BCR) that captures an image of destination data from the address side of the mail piece. The image data is decoded and used to sort the mail pieces for delivery.
In order to process the large volume of mail received daily by the U.S. Postal Service, the feed rate of such feeders is normally in the thousands of mail pieces per hour. Operating at such rates, a feeder will occasionally pick off more than one mail piece from the end of the stack of mail pieces, resulting in a “double” or multiple feed where two or more overlapping mail pieces are presented to the imaging camera at the same time. Such multiple feeds result in mis-sorted mail and can also cause jams in downstream processing equipment, resulting in costly delays.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,817,610, issued Nov. 16, 2004 to Rompe, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein for all purposes, discloses a method and apparatus for detecting overlapped mail pieces as the mail pieces are conveyed on edge over a line camera which scans the bottom edges of the mail pieces. Features of the scanned image are processed using statistical techniques and compared to models of known mail piece configurations to determine the probability that the scanned image data represents overlapping mail pieces. This method relies solely on a view obtainable from the bottom of the mail pieces. There remains a need for further improvement in doubles detection in automated mail processing systems.
A system for detection of doubles in a stream of flat items such as mail pieces being conveyed on a conveyor according to the invention includes an electronic imaging camera positioned to receive an image of a side face of the conveyed items over a first region of its field of view. A reflector is positioned to reflect an edge view of the items to the imaging camera, which edge view is received by the imaging camera over a second region of its field of view. A computer receives image data from the camera and uses program logic to determine whether the image shows one item, or more than one item. A corresponding method includes the steps of creating an electronic composite image of both a side (preferably the front) of the item(s) and its edge, and then analyzing the resulting image to determine if the image shows one item or multiple items. In the composite image, the side view and edge view are preferably aligned with one another. The analysis may then proceed by identifying lines in the image which indicate the boundaries of a flat item, and using deductive rules to determine whether the lines indicate a double.
The invention further provides a computer displayable, composite image in the form of electronic data of one or more overlapping flat items being conveyed on a conveyor. Such an image comprises a first region representing a side view of the flat items, and a second region representing an edge view of the items. The first and second regions of the image are preferably on the same scale and in alignment with each other, i.e., a mail piece edge in one view should line up with the same edge in the other view. The second region of the image, representing the edge view, preferably has smaller dimensions than the first region but greater dot density than the first region. These and other aspects of the invention, which include a biaxial camera useful in the foregoing apparatus and method, are set forth in the detailed description that follows.
In the accompanying drawings, wherein like numerals denote like elements:
Referring now to
Referring now to
Mail pieces 16 are fed to apparatus 30 one at a time by a conventional pickoff mechanism that removes the endmost mail piece from the stack 14 and feeds it into a pinch-belt conveyor 31 wherein each mail piece 16 is carried in an upright position by a pair of opposed belts 32, 36. Belts 32, 36 convey mail piece 16 to an aperture plate 38, at which time the mail piece is engaged on its front face by the aperture plate 38 and on its rear face by belt 36.
Aperture plate 38 includes a vertically elongated slot or aperture 40 to permit line scanning of mail pieces 16 conveyed past the aperture 40. A roller 44, preferably formed from a resilient foam material, presses conveyor 36 against plate 38 to pinch mail piece 16 in order to facilitate scanning and transport of the mail pieces. After scanning, mail piece 16 is conveyed away by opposed takeaway belts 34, 36, which transport the mail piece to the downstream part of the sorting machine.
One or more light sources 46 illuminate the address side 48 of mail pieces 16 passing across aperture plate 38. A light source suitable for illuminating mail pieces 16 is a light bar comprising a row of LEDs (light emitting diodes) mounted in a suitable fixture. As illustrated, a pair of light bars 46 may be provided on opposite sides of aperture 40 at acute angles relative to plate 38 in order to illuminate mail piece 16 through aperture 40 from both sides of the aperture.
Light from the address side 48 of the mail piece is received by a first barrel 50 of a biaxial electronic camera 56 positioned to one side of aperture 40 at a distance representing a sufficient depth of field. Increasing depth of field enables better resolution of the edges of overlapping mail pieces 16 where the leading or trailing edge of one mail piece 16 overlaps a second mail piece. A first region 54 (
Referring to
Barrel 52 is angled downwardly to receive the image of a second region 60 (
To facilitate imaging of bottom edges 62, the mail pieces 16 are illuminated from below with one or more light sources 70. The position of light source or sources 70 is not critical. However, it may be desirable to position two upwardly directed light sources on either side of mirror 64 so that the image of the edge or edges 62 is enhanced by shadowing as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,817,610.
Electronic camera 56 thereby captures a series of linear images or line scans 58 (
The recorded image data for each mail piece 16 processed through apparatus 30 is transmitted to and decoded by computer 20, which is programed with OCR and/or bar code recognition algorithms to extract destination information for mail piece 16. The destination information is used by downstream processing equipment to sort mail piece 16 to the appropriate bin 22, and may be stored to disc media or the like for later retrieval. In the event that no destination information is obtained and/or successfully decoded from the image data, the mail piece is diverted for alternate processing such as video coding.
When image data for a mail piece 16 is transmitted in electronic form from camera 56 to computer 20 for resolution of address information, the image is also analyzed to determine whether the image data represents a double. In order to analyze the image data, computer 20 is programmed with logic that analyzes the image to identify changes in the data that correspond to lines representing edges of a mail piece. The positions of the lines are then correlated to determine if the image data indicates a double.
In the example represented in
The program logic that correlates edges 72-82 of mail pieces 16A, 16B may be used alone or in conjunction with other program logic known in the art that analyzes only image data representing a side or sides of mail piece 16, or the bottom edges of mail pieces 16. Features processed from the first region 54 can be classified as a return address 90, an address block 92, and other indica such as postmarks, bar codes, and the like known to those skilled in the art. Identifying multiple return addresses or indicia can be correlated with edges 72, 74, 78 and 82 to confirm a double. Similarly, the absence of multiple indicia, addresses and return addresses can identify unique mail piece construction, for example, when a mailer affixes a small envelope to a larger envelope or magazine. In this case, the program logic needs to classify the mail piece as a single item even though multiple edges appear in both image regions 54, 60.
Combining the edge correlation program logic with other doubles detect logic enhances the probability of detecting a double or multiple feed as compared to the probability of detecting a multiple feed with logic that analyzes only the sides or bottom edges of mail pieces. Further, since apparatus 30 performs the dual functions of obtaining and resolving features and destination data and detecting double feeds, the need for a separate piece of equipment to perform the doubles detect function is eliminated, permitting the system of the invention to be retrofitted to existing sorting machines. The succession of images of single and multiple mail pieces according to the invention can be stored on a hard drive or other media for later use, such as for mail pieces requiring video coding by a human operator.
Turning to
The horizontal offset between camera 56 and mirror 64 results in the image of the address side 48 of mail piece 16 being shifted relative to the image of bottom edge 62 of the mail piece in the composite image. This shift between the image of the address side 48 and bottom edge 62 is compensated for in the program logic that processes the images. If the displacement between the two optical illumination systems is reduced from that shown in
While the invention has been described in connection with the exemplary embodiments it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments shown. For example, if space is a consideration, the imaging camera(s) can be placed closer to the conveyor line and facing away from it, and reflectors used to direct the light to the camera in order to maintain focal depth. As reflectors, prisms may be used in place of the mirrors disclosed in the foregoing description. Fiber optics can be used to conduct light to the imaging camera, especially for the edgewise view. Further, functions attributed to one or more computers may be combined or separated and accomplished using a single or multiple data processing devices incorporated into the same or different devices. “Program logic” preferably refers to software but could also be implemented as firmware or hardware. Thus, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that modifications and recombinations of the invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/676,862, filed May 2, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3868478 | Zeenkov | Feb 1975 | A |
4053056 | Day | Oct 1977 | A |
4158835 | Miura et al. | Jun 1979 | A |
4160546 | McMillan et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4171744 | Hubbard | Oct 1979 | A |
4516264 | Corvari et al. | May 1985 | A |
4516265 | Kizu et al. | May 1985 | A |
4632252 | Haruki et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4733226 | Kasuya et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4900941 | Barton et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4929843 | Chmielewski et al. | May 1990 | A |
4972494 | White et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4992649 | Mampe et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5065237 | Tsikos et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5103489 | Miette | Apr 1992 | A |
5304787 | Wang | Apr 1994 | A |
5311999 | Malow et al. | May 1994 | A |
5331151 | Cochran et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5371357 | Robertson | Dec 1994 | A |
5504319 | Li et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5534690 | Goldenberg et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5614710 | Mondie et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5675671 | Hayduchok et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5697610 | Holmes et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699161 | Woodworth | Dec 1997 | A |
5719678 | Reynolds et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5737438 | Zlotnick et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5755336 | Rudy | May 1998 | A |
5770841 | Moed et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5803702 | Mullins et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5841881 | Iwakawa et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5894530 | Wilt | Apr 1999 | A |
5912698 | Graulich et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917926 | Leverett | Jun 1999 | A |
5966457 | Lemelson | Oct 1999 | A |
5984303 | Oohara et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991041 | Woodworth | Nov 1999 | A |
6064756 | Beaty et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064759 | Buckley et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078678 | Gavrilos | Jun 2000 | A |
6104427 | Stein et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122001 | Micaletti et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6236735 | Bjorner et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239397 | Rosenbaum et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6316741 | Fitzgibbons et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6360001 | Berger et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370259 | Hobson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377698 | Cumoli et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401936 | Isaacs et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6471044 | Isaacs et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6512849 | Yair et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6614928 | Chung et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6679491 | Luebben et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6728391 | Wu et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737633 | Francke | May 2004 | B2 |
6761352 | Scicluna et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6778683 | Bonner et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6817610 | Rompe | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823599 | Minarik et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6845296 | Ban et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6934413 | Navon | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6944324 | Tran et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7065229 | Caillon et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7118042 | Moore et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7215363 | Stamm | May 2007 | B2 |
7216013 | Kibbler | May 2007 | B2 |
7336814 | Boca et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7356162 | Caillon | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7388600 | Prudhomme et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7446278 | Fesquet et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7599516 | Limer et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
20020118873 | Tran et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030012422 | Sawai et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014376 | DeWitt et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050259847 | Genc et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060007304 | Anderson | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070237356 | Dwinell et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090051108 | Bell | Feb 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0016915 | Mar 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060269102 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60676862 | May 2005 | US |