The present disclosure relates generally to selective catalytic reduction injector controls, and more specifically to a process for detecting an opening time and status of a selective catalytic reduction injector.
The global drive to reduce NOx and CO2 emissions from diesel engine exhausts has led to the implementation of selective catalytic reduction systems in diesel engine vehicles to reduce the automotive emissions. Selective catalytic reduction systems operate by adding a gaseous or liquid reductant to the exhaust gas stream from an engine. The gaseous or liquid reductant is absorbed onto a catalyst where the reductant reacts with nitrogen oxides in the exhaust gas to form water vapor and nitrogen.
In order to properly interact with on-board diagnostic systems, such as OBD or OBDII, existing selective catalytic reduction systems include self-diagnostics to identify faults and enable pin point replacement while the vehicle is being serviced.
Disclosed is a method for detecting an opening time of a valve, including the steps of receiving an actuation current profile of the valve, processing the valve current profile using at least a slope reflection detector, and determining a status of the valve based on an output of the slope reflection detector.
Also disclosed is a vehicle including an exhaust system including a selective catalytic reduction injector, a controller operable to detect a current draw of the selective catalytic reduction injector, the controller being operable to detect a slope reflection in a current draw of the selective catalytic reduction injector, thereby detecting an opening time of the selective catalytic reduction injector.
Also disclosed is a method for controlling a selective catalytic reduction injector comprising the steps of Instructing a selective catalytic reduction injector to begin opening using a controller, receiving a selective catalytic reduction injector current profile of the selective catalytic reduction injector at the controller, processing the selective catalytic reduction injector current profile using at least a slope reflection detector in the controller, and determining an open status of the selective catalytic reduction injector based on an output of the slope reflection detector.
These and other features of the present invention can be best understood from the following specification and drawings, the following of which is a brief description.
One of the inputs that the sensor package can detect, and communicate back to the controller 50, is a current draw of the selective catalytic injector 40. This current draw can be aggregated by the controller 50 to determine a current profile of the selective catalytic reduction injector 40. Based on the current profile of the selective catalytic reduction injector 40, the controller 50 can determine a precise injector opening time and whether the injector is stuck or unstuck using the below described process.
The current profile of the selective catalytic reduction injector 40 is a function of battery voltage supplied to the injector, injector temperature and injector fluid pressure. At the conditions of low temperature, low pressure, and high voltage, the current profile of a nominal selective catalytic reduction injector 40 is almost the same as (superficially similar to) a stuck selective catalytic reduction injector, and a top level, or visual, inspection of the current profile is insufficient to identify a stuck injector or to precisely identify the opening time of the injector 40.
With continued reference to
The detection window 116, 126 of a current profile 110, 120 is the window during which the controller 50 analyzes the current profile to detect the presence of the dip 114. During this window 116, 126, the injector current data is processed by the controller 50 and fed to a slope reflection detector to detect the selective catalytic reduction injector 40 opening. The slope reflection detector can be another controller, a software module stored in a memory of the controller 50, or any other similar system.
With continued reference to
If injection has started, the process 200 advances to a wait for slope reflection detection window to start step 212. As illustrated in
If the slope reflection detection window has not started when the controller 50 performs the slope reflection detection window start check 214, the process loops back to the wait for slope reflection detection window to start step 212. If the slope reflection detection window 116, 126 has started, the controller 50 begins accumulating current data to construct a current profile of the injector 40 in a detect current data step 216. The current data can be accumulated using any acceptable sensor arrangement. In some examples, the current data is collected using an extremely high sampling rate. The sampling rate is the rate at which data samples are detected. By way of example, a sampling rate of 1 microsecond corresponds to one current detection occurring every microsecond.
In order to reduce the detected current data to a manageable condition and amount, the detected data is filtered by the controller 50 to remove high frequency noise using a standard digital filter. In example utilizing a high sampling rate, the data is further downsampled using known downsampling techniques to reduce the amount of data in the current profile. The filtering and downsampling is performed by the controller 50 in a filter current data step 218.
The filtered and downsampled data forms an injector current profile, such as the current profiles 110, 120 illustrated in
The slope reflection detector determines if a slope reflection is present on the injector current profile. If no slope reflection is detected, the controller 50 sets the status of the injector 40 as “stuck” in a determine opening time and status step 222. A “stuck” status indicates that the injector 40 became stuck during opening and did not fully open. If a slope reflection is detected, then the controller 50 sets the injector 40 status as “open” and determines the time at which the injector 40 became fully open to be a minimum point of the slope reflection in the determine opening time and status step 222.
Once the opening time and status of the injector 40 has been determined, the controller 50 reports the opening time and status in a report opening time and status step 224. The reporting can be to another separate controller, a subprogram within the controller 50, or a diagnostic system, such as an OBD (On-Board Diagnostic) or OBDII (On-Board Diagnostic II). Alternately, the opening time and status can be reported to any other system where the opening time and status of the injector 40 is needed.
With continued reference to
The slope reflection detector utilizes a modified median filter to determine a slope reflection point 314. The slope reflection detector processes the current profile 302 entry by entry, replacing each entry with the centered value of neighboring entries falling within a median window 320 to determine a median current profile. The entries within the median window are then sorted in increasing value. The slope reflection detector further processes the current profile 302 entry by entry, replacing each entry with mean value of neighboring entries falling with a mean window 310 to determine a mean current profile.
As can be seen in
The value of the output 340 is determined by the following relationship:
Out=mid*dfact−(mean*gfact).
Where Out is the output value, mid is the center value of the median window 320, mean is the mean value of the mean window 310, and dfact and gfact are variable factors. dfact and gfact are determined by the following relationships:
gfact=1+ABS(mid−mean)
dfact=1−ABS(mid−mean)
Where mid is the center value of the median window 320, mean is the mean value of the mean window 310, and ABS is the absolute value function.
As a result of the above relationships, the bigger the difference between the value of the median window 320 (mid) and the mean window 310 (mean), the greater the factor gfact will be. Similarly, the bigger the difference between the value of the median window 320 (mid) and the mean window 310 (mean), the smaller factor dfact will be. This difference in gfact and dfact results in an output (out) that greatly magnifies a slope reflection 314, while maintaining a relative constant value when no slope reflection is present.
With continued reference to
In the non-stuck slope reflection chart 410, an output 412 of the slope reflection detector stays at an approximately 0 value until the slope reflection occurs. The slope reflection results in a sharp decrease in the output of the slope reflection detector for the duration of the slope reflection, after which the slope reflection detector output returns to the approximately 0 value. In contrast, when no slope reflection is present, as in slope reflection chart 420, the output of the slope reflection detector maintains the approximately 0 value for the entire duration. Based on this difference, the controller 50 can detect when the selective catalytic reduction injector 40 is stuck (i.e. when there is no slope reflection).
Further determinable from the slope reflection chart 410 is the precise time at which the selective catalytic reduction injector 40 becomes fully open. As the slope reflection occurs at the point that the selective catalytic reduction injector 40 becomes fully open, the precise fully open time of the selective catalytic reduction injector 40 is the minimum value point 414 of the output 412 of the slope reflection detector plus delay time and filter process offset. The precise opening time of the selective catalytic reduction injector 40 is precise to within a time period of the downsampled data rate. Thus, if the downsampled data rate is 1 microsecond, the time of the minimum value point 414 can fall within 1 microsecond of the actual fully open time of the selective catalytic reduction injector 40, depending on the system tolerances and slope reflection detector filter calibration.
By utilizing the above described process, the controller 50 can determine the precise opening time of a selective catalytic reduction injector and whether the selective catalytic reduction injector is stuck or non-stuck. As can be appreciated by one of skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure, the above described process can be applied to any number of injector valves exhibiting similar slope reflection characteristics, and is not limited to selective catalytic reduction injectors.
It is further understood that any of the above described concepts can be used alone or in combination with any or all of the other above described concepts. Although an embodiment of this invention has been disclosed, a worker of ordinary skill in this art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. For that reason, the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4823825 | Buchl | Apr 1989 | A |
5535621 | Glidewell et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5808471 | Rooke et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5941209 | Hashimoto | Aug 1999 | A |
5988143 | Dietz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6115727 | Schooler et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
7152594 | Anilovich et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7677086 | Albertson et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7802563 | Behr et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8880276 | Qiao et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20050126635 | Addink et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070277777 | Barnes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090048802 | Wang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20120296551 | Kabasin | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130180323 | Peucat et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140190453 | Qiao et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150114099 | Qiao et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150128568 | Barbier et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102797546 | May 2015 | CN |
3611220 | Jan 1987 | DE |
4308811 | Jan 1994 | DE |
19730594 | Feb 1998 | DE |
102011078161 | Sep 2012 | DE |
0878617 | Apr 2001 | EP |
2060762 | May 2009 | EP |
2060763 | May 2009 | EP |
2585692 | Apr 2014 | EP |
6036739 | Feb 1985 | JP |
S61-250309 | Nov 1986 | JP |
9503270 | Mar 1997 | JP |
200284140 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001280189 | Oct 2001 | JP |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/689,367, Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. |
EP Search Report dated Mar. 18, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/323,373, Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. |
English Translation of the JPO Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2015. |
Chinese Office Action for counterpart Chinese application No. 201410589824.7 dated Aug. 15, 2016. |
First Search for counterpart Chinese application No. 201410589824.7, dated Aug. 3, 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150113950 A1 | Apr 2015 | US |