Claims
- 1. A tire revolution detection apparatus for detecting a revolution of a tire by detecting a magnetic field generated by the tire of a vehicle, comprising:a pair of magnetic detection elements arranged so that magnetic detection directions thereof are parallel with each other or in series with each other; a circuit for driving said pair of magnetic detection elements and extracting detection signals from said pair of magnetic detection elements; a differential amplifier circuit for differentially amplifying the detection signals of said pair of magnetic detection elements extracted by said circuit; an A/D converter for A/D converting a differential output from said differential amplifier circuit; and a microcomputer for processing an output from said A/D converter, wherein said microcomputer determines a peak in a waveform of the differential output on the basis of a presence/absence of reversal of a change in direction of output data from said A/D converter, a potential difference between said determined peak and an immediately preceding peak, and if the potential difference exceeds a predetermined threshold value, that said determined peak is an effective peak effective for tire revolution detection, and outputs a pulse in correspondence with a determination result of the effective peak.
- 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said pair of magnetic detection elements comprise a pair of magnetic impedance elements, and said circuit for driving said magnetic detection elements and extracting the detection signals comprises an oscillation circuit for applying RF currents to said pair of magnetic impedance elements, and two detecting circuits for detecting signals representing a change in voltage across two terminals of each of said pair of magnetic impedance elements in correspondence with an external magnetic field.
- 3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said microcomputer outputs a pulse with a small pulsewidth every time the peak is determined to be an effective peak.
- 4. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein said microcomputer outputs a pulse with a small pulsewidth every time the peak is determined to be an effective peak.
- 5. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said microcomputer outputs a pulse which is inverted every time the peak is determined to be an effective peak.
- 6. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein said microcomputer outputs a pulse which is inverted every time the peak is determined to be an effective peak.
- 7. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the threshold value is set to fall within a range from 10% to 90% of a maximum interpeak potential difference measured in advance.
- 8. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the threshold value is set to fall within a range from 10% to 90% of a maximum interpeak potential difference measured in advance.
- 9. The apparatus according to claim 3, wherein the threshold value is set to fall within a range from 10% to 90% of a maximum interpeak potential difference measured in advance.
- 10. The apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the threshold value is set to fall within a range from 10% to 90% of a maximum interpeak potential difference measured in advance.
- 11. The apparatus according to claim 5, wherein the threshold value is set to fall within a range from 10% to 90% of a maximum interpeak potential difference measured in advance.
- 12. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the threshold value is set to fall within a range from 10% to 90% of a maximum interpeak potential difference measured in advance.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
8-222269 |
Aug 1996 |
JP |
|
Parent Case Info
This is a divisional of co-pending application Ser. No. 08/915,858, filed Aug. 21, 1997.
US Referenced Citations (9)
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number |
Date |
Country |
39 42 573 A1 |
Jun 1991 |
DE |
0 590 190 A1 |
Apr 1994 |
EP |
07181239 |
Jul 1995 |
JP |
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry |
European Search Report (97114492.8 (EP 20498) Oct. 1998). |