The present invention relates to ultrasound data processing, and more particularly, to finding the attributes of fluid flow in a living body, such as ascertaining the speed, direction, and volume of a fluid flow in a vessel using ultrasound.
Several techniques exist for locating an object using wave-propagation. In the fields of sonar, radar, ultrasound, and telecommunications, transmitting/receiving elements are placed in an array. Some or all of the elements of the array emit pulses of electromagnetic radiation or sound toward a target, and reflections of the wave pattern from the target are received at some or all of the elements. To receive the maximum amplitude (strongest signal) possible, the received signals from all the elements are focused into a beam.
To determine blood flow velocity from a beam, techniques from Doppler radar may be adapted for use in ultrasound imaging. With reference to
Known ultrasound imaging equipment displays the radial component of blood flow (or the power associated therewith) by translation into a color scale. Given this colorized display, the direction of flow is estimated by a skilled sonographer and input into a 2-D display in order to enable the approximate calculation of actual velocity (as opposed to its radial component) at one point in the vessel.
A drawback of this manual approach is that even for a skilled sonographer, the resultant true velocity is only approximate. Another drawback is that the sonographer needs to use both hands and eyes to obtain a single measurement. The sonographer manipulates an ultrasound probe with one hand and manipulates a joy stick or track ball with the other hand, all while observing the ultrasound image on a screen. The sonographer uses the joy stick or track ball to “draw” a line segment parallel to the blood flow on the screen and then have the ultrasound equipment compute an approximate “true” velocity from the measured radial velocity. The computation is made by utilizing the relationship between the true velocity at a point in a blood vessel to the radial component of velocity by s=v cos θ where s is the magnitude of the true velocity and θ is the angle (2-dimensional for 2-D ultrasound imaging or 3-dimensional for 3-D or 4-D ultrasound imaging) between the radial velocity measured by the probe and the actual direction of flow, which is approximated by the line drawn on the screen by the sonographer.
It is difficult to get a good approximation of the angle θ using this two hand manual approach. Traditionally, peak systolic blood velocity at one point has been obtained with this method. However, it is difficult, if not impossible, to obtain other desirable parameters such as volume flow (the amount of blood flowing through a given cross-sectional area of the blood vessel) and lumen area (the total area of a cross section perpendicular to the blood vessel at a given point) with the use of this method. Nor can true velocity be obtained at more than one point, such as the full field of view of the blood vessel 6. To calculate values accurately, it is necessary to find the true vector velocity of blood flow, including magnitude and direction, over the entire field of view.
The disadvantages and limitations of prior art ultrasound apparatus and methods are overcome by the present invention which includes, a method for determining the location of an effective center of a fluid flow in a vessel using an ultrasound apparatus with a transducer array for propagating and receiving ultrasound energy. Ultrasound energy is propagated along an axis of propagation Z, which can be described by a spacial coordinate system (x, y, z) in which the dimension z is in the same direction as the axis of propagation Z. The ultrasound energy projects upon the vessel defining a set of coordinates in the spacial coordinate system where the ultrasound energy impinges upon fluid in the vessel at a given value of the dimension y. A Doppler-shifted signal reflected from the fluid in the vessel at a plurality of the set of coordinates is received and a set of quantities expressed as a density a is derived from the Doppler shifted signal for each of the set of coordinates, the density being a function of the Doppler shift in frequency associated with each of the coordinates, the density being indicative of the movement of the fluid. One of a mean, mode or median is calculated of each of the dimensions of the set of coordinates in conjunction with the density associated therewith.
The steps above are repeated after changing the set of coordinates to a second set of coordinates to determine another center in the fluid flow at a different point along the length of the vessel and then determining a vector v which connects the two centers and indicates the approximate direction of flow and the approximate centerline. In a similar manner, a plurality of center points and vectors can be determined using the method just described to ascertain a centerline of the vessel over an entire field of view.
Further features and advantages of the invention are described in the following detailed description of an exemplary embodiment of the invention, by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, reference is made to the following detailed description of an exemplary embodiment considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
With reference to
and the mode is the value xp for which
Now referring to
The direction of wave propagation 32 of the ultrasound probe emitted energy forms an angle θ with the direction of fluid flow 28. Similarly, the plane 38 forms an angle φ with plane 24. Since Doppler cannot measure true velocity s, but only its radial component, s cos θ, it is necessary to find the direction of fluid flow 34 and thus the direction of the centerline 14 relative to the direction 32 of wave propagation in order to correct for the angle θ. Likewise to find the proper orientation of cross-section of area 20 from the orientation of area 34 in order to find, say, the lumen area, then it is necessary to correct for the angle φ.
With reference to
If the plane 38 is divided into a large number of rectangular regions 40, then each region 40 represents a three dimensional pixel known as a voxel. If the centerline 14 is defined with reference to a mean position of x and z dimensions at a fixed y on the plane 38, then a point on the centerline 14 is given by the mean of the center, i.e. a point with dimensions x(y), y, z(y) such that
at a given time t where n is the nth voxel within the ellipse 36.
The centerline 14 is calculated from the density variable a(x, y, z) which is based on 2-D, 3-D, or 4-D Power Doppler or Color Doppler image data (after a Wall filter). The Power Doppler or Color Doppler densities a(x, y, z) are derived with the use of the method disclosed in International Patent Publication No. WO 00/72756 (i.e., international Patent Application No. PCT/US00/14691) and U.S. Pat. No. 6,524,253 B1, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. With reference to page 34, lines 18–21, of International Patent Publication No. WO 00/72756, a generalized Doppler spectrum can be denoted by a 5-dimensional data set A1(r, a, e, f, t) which is the real-time signal return amplitude of what is being measured (to obtain blood flow velocity), where r=depth (or range), a=azimuth, e=elevation, f=Doppler frequency, and t=time. Such a data set can be readily converted to rectangular coordinates, where it becomes A2(x, y, z, f, t) or A3(x, y, z, v, t) where v is the radial velocity, the component of velocity of fluid flow in the direction 32, and v is related to Doppler frequency by the relation
where c and f0 are the sonic propagation speed and frequency, respectively. A still more interesting 5-D data set would be A4(x, y, z, s, t) where s is the fluid speed (e.g. blood speed), i.e., the signed magnitude of the true total vector velocity of fluid flow where v=s cos θ and θ is the angle described above for
A 4-D Doppler ultrasound machine as described in International Patent Publication No. WO 00/72756 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,524,253 B1 will produce three different 4-D data sets corresponding to the three common vascular imaging modes:
With reference to
The quantity v is the mean radial velocity of fluid flow corresponding to the measured amplitude A3 as already discussed above, which is obtained using the autocorrelation function described in “Real-Time Two-Dimensional Blood Flow Imaging Using an Autocorrelation Technique,” C. Kasai, K. Nemakawa, A. Koyano, and R. Omoto, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics, vol. SU-32, no. 3, pp. 458–463, May 1985, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The centerline 14 for v is the mean, mode, or median of x(or y) and z as a function of y (or x) using v as a density. For the case of a point on the centerline 14 given by the mean of the center, i.e. a point with dimensions x(y), y, z(y) based on density v, values of the dimensions x and z are thus:
Since v is merely the radial component of velocity, it is desirable to calculate
s(x,y,z,t) “4-D True Velocity Flow” (10)
s is the magnitude of the vector v, the vector of true velocity in the direction of fluid flow 28 at the centerline 14. Let n represent a voxel number (the nth voxel in or on the ellipse 36). The measured mean Doppler frequency, fn, at each voxel is proportional to v=vz, the z component of the mean velocity, vn, in that resolution cell. The flow center can be defined as the locus of centers of the elipses as y varies (i.e., along the centerline 14).
To derive v and s from vn which is itself derived from fn using the autocorrelation method mentioned above, let us obtain the complex output of the Wall filter in each bin n, or unj. If Ns ultrasound pulses are used (Ns≦32) with an Nf tap Wall filter (Nf≦11), there will be J=Ns−Nf+1 values of j. Ignoring the voxel identifier, n (to simplify notation), let the autocorrelation vector u1=(u1, u2 . . . uJ-1)t and let u2=(u2, u3 . . . uJ)t where u1 is autocorrelated with u2, u2 is autocorrelated with U3, etc. Let F=u1*u2 (the complex inner product, where*is the conjugate transpose), then
fn=(PRF/2π)angle(F) (11)
and
angle(F)=a tan2[Im(F)/Re(F)] (12)
where PRF is the ultrasound pulse repetition frequency. Put another way, the quantity F is the autocorrelation function of the complex wall filter output at a lag of one. The 3-D orientation of the centerline 14 and hence the direction of the vector velocity v can be computed, for example, by using two consecutive values of y, forming the vector
v=(vx, vy, vz)∝({overscore (x)}(y2)−{overscore (x)}(y1),y2−y1, {overscore (z)}(y2)−{overscore (z)}(y1) (13)
which can be transformed into a unit vector by dividing by the square root of the sum of the squares of the three coordinate differences. The magnitude of the velocity is then obtained by dividing the measured radial velocity by the cosine of the 3-Doppler angle θ to determine the speed sn at each voxel. Thus if fn(x,y,z) is the Doppler frequency calculated above and sn=s(x,y,z) is the blood speed, then
where (a, b, 0) is the center of the sub-array of the ultrasound probe currently active to observe the point (x, y, z). The constant c is the speed of sound in soft tissue, about 1540 meters/second or mm/millisecond, and f0 is the center frequency or carrier frequency of the ultrasound energy being used. A more convenient way to express this formula is to choose two points on the vessel centerline 14, near where fn was measured, and let the coordinates of one with respect to the other be (xc, yc, zc). The true speed sn of a voxel is then given by
To obtain a centerline 14 from threshold flow data, the equations listed above for obtaining the mean, median, or mode, and particularly the x and z dimensions of the mean centers of the centerline 14 would apply to values of v or p above a certain threshold value.
With reference to
To obtain the volume flow using an N-point FFT, reference is made now to
the Doppler frequency per frequency bin is
fi=PRF×i/N; (17)
and the velocity in a frequency bin is
The power-velocity integral is computed as
and i≠0. The volume flow is then
where p0 is the total power out of the Wall filter in a single central voxel about the centerline 14, and Δx, Δz are the lengths of the dimensions of each voxel (n) in the summation. The result is independent of cos θ, provided that θ is not close to 90°.
Alternatively, volume flow can be estimated directly from “4-D True Velocity Flow” color-Doppler image data. Referring again to
The simple yc/zc slope simultaneously corrects for both the Doppler angle θ and the orientation angle of the x-z image plane φ without having to compute the square root of the sum of the squares that is needed to determine sn.
To determine the lumen area from either power Doppler, color Doppler, or true velocity flow (pn, fn, or sn), select the plane 24 (the plane that cuts though the vessel 16 orthogonal to the centerline 14), count the number of pixels in the vessel 16, and multiply by the pixel area. Pixels on vessel boundaries can be given a reduced weight for a more precise measurement.
Additional parameters can be obtained or imaged once the centerline and true vector velocity is known. Referring now to
With reference to
The analog processor 72 contains circuitry for amplification, gain management, and analog-to-digital (A/D) conversion of the ultrasound pulses to be transmitted and the received reflections from the transducer elements. Between the transmitting and receiving circuitry (not shown) is an electrical protection circuit, since the signals emanating from the transducer elements require voltages in the neighborhood of 100 V, while the received reflected signals are on the order of microvolts. Since the dynamic range of the received signal is very high, there is a need for a circuit for performing time gain control. Since reflected signals are received from different locations in the body, these signals may be out of phase with each other, so that gain for each transducer received signal is adjusted dynamically in time to line up received signals. An anti-aliasing filter is located between the receiving amplifier and the A/D converter. The A/D converter can be of a type that outputs the signal in a parallel array of bits or can output the digital data serially.
A digital interface processor (DIP) 74 receives the digital version of the received signal from the analog processor 72. The DIP 74 organizes the sampled data to put it in a proper format so that the digital processor 76 can form a beam. If the data from the A/D converter of the analog processor 72 is processed serially, then the DIP 74 can also packetize and time compress the data.
The digital processor (DP) 76 takes packetized (in the case of serial processing) or time division multiplexed (in the case of parallel processing) data and forms a beam representing the array of transduced elements in the ultrasound probe. 66. For each transduced element, a time delay is added to cause all elements of the combined wavefront to be in phase. After beam forming, the combined beam contains the wavefronts represented by the frequency shifted Doppler signal. At this point, the Doppler information is separated from the non-Doppler information using a Wall filter as previously discussed with reference to
It will be understood that the embodiments described herein are merely exemplary and that a person skilled in the art may make many variations and modifications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. All such variations and modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/515,350 filed Oct. 29, 2003, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5148810 | Maslak et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5261408 | Maslak et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5278757 | Hoctor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5291892 | O'Donnell | Mar 1994 | A |
5406163 | Carson et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5409010 | Beach et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5460180 | Klepper et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5546807 | Oxaal et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5623930 | Wright et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5701898 | Adam et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5722412 | Pflugrath et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5787049 | Bates | Jul 1998 | A |
5808962 | Steinberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817024 | Ogle et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5840033 | Takeuchi | Nov 1998 | A |
5911692 | Hussain et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922962 | Ishrak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928151 | Hossack et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944666 | Hossack et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5971927 | Mine | Oct 1999 | A |
6066096 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6080107 | Poland | Jun 2000 | A |
6135971 | Hutchinson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148095 | Prause et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6186949 | Hatfield et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6228031 | Hwang et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238346 | Mason | May 2001 | B1 |
6524253 | Abend | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6682483 | Abend | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6682488 | Abend | Jan 2004 | B1 |
20020151790 | Abend | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20040019278 | Abend | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040254468 | Herzog et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267127 | Abend et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004461 | Abend | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050004464 | Miller | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050124885 | Abend et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050124885 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60515350 | Oct 2003 | US |