Patent Application
20150156665
The present invention is related to the field of wireless communications. More specifically, the present invention relates to Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) systems that use a Carrier Sense Multiple Access/Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA) mechanism and provides means for determining and managing congestion and further enhances network management by providing novel medium access control (MAC) measurements in wireless communications.
Wireless communication systems are well known in the art. Generally, such systems comprise communication stations, which transmit and receive wireless communication signals between each other. Depending upon the type of system, communication stations typically are one of two types: base stations or wireless transmit/receive units (WTRUs), which include mobile units.
The term base station as used herein includes, but is not limited to, a base station, Node B, site controller, access point or other interfacing device in a wireless environment that provides WTRUs with wireless access to a network with which the base station is associated.
The term WTRU as used herein includes, but is not limited to, a user equipment, mobile station, fixed or mobile subscriber unit, pager, or any other type of device capable of operating in a wireless environment. WTRUs include personal communication devices, such as phones, video phones, and Internet ready phones that have network connections. In addition, WTRUs include portable personal computing devices, such as PDAs and notebook computers with wireless modems that have similar network capabilities. WTRUs that are portable or can otherwise change location are referred to as mobile units. Generically, base stations are also WTRUs.
Typically, a network of base stations is provided where each base station is capable of conducting concurrent wireless communications with appropriately configured WTRUs. Some WTRUs are configured to conduct wireless communications directly between each other, i.e., without being relayed through a network via a base station. This is commonly called peer-to-peer wireless communications. Where a WTRU is configured to communicate with other WTRUs it may itself be configured as and function as a base station. WTRUs can be configured for use in multiple networks with both network and peer-to-peer communications capabilities.
One type of wireless system, called a wireless local area network (WLAN), can be configured to conduct wireless communications with WTRUs equipped with WLAN modems that are also able to conduct peer-to-peer communications with similarly equipped WTRUs. Currently, WLAN modems are being integrated into many traditional communicating and computing devices by manufacturers. For example, cellular phones, personal digital assistants, and laptop computers are being built with one or more WLAN modems.
A popular local area network environment with one or more WLAN base stations, typically called access points (APs), is built according to the IEEE 802.11 family of standards. An example 802.11 Local Area Network (LAN), as shown in
A wireless LAN (WLAN) may be formed by a single BSS, with a single AP, having a portal to a distribution system (DS). However, installations are typically composed of several cells, and APs are connected through a backbone, referred to as a DS.
A mobile ad-hoc network (MANET) is also shown in
An interconnected WLAN, including the different cells, their respective APs and the DS, is seen as a single IEEE 802.11 network and is referred to as an Extended Service Set (ESS). IEEE 802.11 networks typically use a Carrier-Sense Multiple Access/Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA) protocol to exchange information wirelessly between nodes (or STAs) of the WLAN network. In this framework, STAs desiring to transmit must contend for access to the wireless medium. The contention mechanism involves waiting for the medium to remain idle for a certain period of time (according to a set of rules prescribed by the standard) before transmitting a data packet. The time it takes a node to access the channel and transmit its packet increases as the number of stations and data traffic increases. Congestion in such a system can occur when the time to gain access to the medium becomes intolerable due to too many stations competing for the same medium.
Due to the nature of the CSMA/CA protocol, and considering that most transmissions are best effort, it is quite difficult to determine when a system is classified as experiencing congestion. Determining congestion in such an complex system is not a simple task, as one choice of metrics could indicate congestion while another metric will not.
Several metrics that can be used to indicate congestion include: collision rate, channel utilization, i.e., the time that the medium is busy, etc. However, these metrics, taken individually do not necessarily give a true picture of the congestion. For example, the channel utilization metric does not give an accurate picture of the congestion situation. One station can be alone on a channel and transmitting all the time. In this case the channel utilization metric would be high. It may seem like the system would not be capable of supporting any more traffic from other stations. However, if a new station were to access the channel, it could still experience good throughput by virtue of the CSMA/CA mechanism, as the channel would then be equally shared between the two stations. A system is in fact congested when there are a number of stations contending for the same channel at a given time and experiencing severe delays due to the longer time each station has to wait for access to the medium, as well as the higher number of collisions.
In another aspect, there is currently limited network management functionality, particularly in systems compliant with the IEEE 802.11 and IEEE 802.11k standards. The inventors have recognized that there are certain limitations to the usefulness of channel loading information presently employed in the context of network management. There is also a need for an improved method of achieving better network management after considering the limitations of using channel-loading measurements. This present invention provides enhanced network management associated with the IEEE 802.11 and IEEE 802.11k standards in the context of channel loading information.
The method and apparatus may be used for determining and transmitting congestion information in a wireless local area network (WLAN) system. The method and apparatus may be used for managing congestion when congestion is detected. The method and apparatus may be implemented in wireless systems that use CSMA/CA. Several metrics may be used to determine congestion including, for example: average duration of backoff procedure, in-Basic Service Set (in-BSS) deferral rate, out-of-BSS deferral rate, number of associated stations, mean WTRU channel utilization, and average buffer Medium Access Control (MAC) occupancy. Actions taken to relieve congestion may include, for example: sorting the set of WTRUs in order of most wasted time spent attempting to transmit acknowledged/unacknowledged packets, and disassociating each WTRU one at a time until the congestion is relieved.
The method and apparatus may be used to perform network management through the use of MAC measurements. The measurements may include, for example, a STA uplink traffic loading measurement, and/or an Access Point (AP) service loading measurement.
The method and apparatus may use a management information base (MIB) representation of the transmit queue size to provide, for example, a measure of the STA transmit load in terms of unserved, queued traffic demand. The method and apparatus may use a MIB representation of the AP service load to provide, for example, a measure of the AP service load to be used to assist STAs with handoff decisions. Implementation of these features may be as software or in any other convenient form. The method and apparatus may be applicable, for example, to layers 1 and 2 as applied to an IEEE 802.11k system in the context of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) and code division multiple access 2000 (CDMA 2000) systems. However, the method and apparatus may have applicability to other scenarios as well.
The methods may be implemented in selectively configured WTRUs and APs of various forms.
A more detailed understanding may be had from the following description of the embodiments, given by way of example and to be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Although the features and elements of the present invention are described in the preferred embodiments in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone (without the other features and elements of the preferred embodiments) or in various combinations with or without other features and elements of the present invention.
One aspect of the present invention introduces two different approaches to determine the loading metric of channel congestion; first, a Basic Service Set (BSS)-based load metric, which is based primarily on the load of individual APs. Second, a channel-based load metric, which is a metric indicating the load shared amongst different APs.
BSS-based load metrics are metrics that determine high load condition and channel congestion. The two preferred BSS-based load metrics are: in-BSS deferral rate metric, and packet error rate metric.
The Deferral Rate (DR) is a measurement that represents the percentage of time that the receiver of the AP is carrier locked (i.e. Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) indicates a busy condition) while the AP has one or more packets to transmit (i.e. it's queue is not empty). In other words, DR represents the amount of time that the AP spends deferring transmission to other WLAN nodes.
The in-BSS Deferral Rate represents the percentage of time that the receiver of the AP is carrier locked onto an in-BSS packet (i.e. a packet originating from one of its associated WTRUs) while the AP has one or more packets to transmit. In other words, the in-BSS DR represents the amount of time that the AP spends deferring its own transmissions because one of its associated WTRUs has taken control of the medium (i.e. is transmitting a packet).
The in-BSS deferral rate is indicative of the level of the current load placed in a system, and when there is a need to transmit to another node in the same BSS, measuring the time spent deferring a transmission. A low in-BSS deferral metric indicates that the load for the BSS is low. A high in-BSS deferral rate indicates that there are many nodes transmitting at the same time and that there is thus a significant load.
In a case where there are only two nodes in the system with a significant amount of data to transmit, the deferral rate could be high and if used alone will indicate congestion. However, since there are only two nodes in the system, this is not considered a congestion situation. To address this situation, the present invention uses the packet error rate (PER) in addition to the deferral rate metric.
The Packet Error Rate (PER) is the ratio of the number of failed transmissions (i.e. packet transmissions for which an ACK was not received) to the total number of transmitted packets. The PER metric is a good indication of the collision rate in the system when conservative data transmission rates are used. The larger the number of nodes in a system, the higher the probability of collision. The use of both the in-BSS deferral rate metric and the PER metric together provide a better indication of the load of an AP than either metric used individually.
In the present invention, as shown in
Whether or not congestion is detected based on the criteria as set forth above, or employing other techniques for determining congestion, the present invention provides the following actions; first, the AP at step S7, sorts all WTRUs in the Basic Service Set (BSS) in order of the amount of time spent trying to retransmit. Wasted time is preferably determined in accordance with the wasted time algorithm ALGwt set forth below. More specifically, a set or list of WTRUs with unacknowledged packets is created. For each unacknowledged packet to a WTRUs, the sum of all the wasted time spent trying to transmit and re-transmit the packet (i.e. packet size/packet transmission rate plus a penalty for each retransmitted packet) is recorded. The penalty reflects the increasing delay associated with retransmissions, i.e. the backoff time due to the doubling of the congestion window (CW). The penalty represents the added delay incurred from the time the packet is ready for transmission to the time the packet is actually transmitted over the medium. This retransmit time metric is therefore much greater for stations wasting time retransmitting packets following collisions. The retransmit time metric is normalized over a selected time period.
An example formula for determining wasted time for a WTRU is given by:
where:
An example of the wasted_txtimeSTA calculation is given below: Assume that an AP has 20 packets to send to a particular STA. During the course of the transmissions, the AP monitors and records whether the packet has been successfully acknowledged or not and the number packet re-transmissions as, for example, follows:
wasted_txtimeSTA=(12000/11e6)+(12000/11e6+640.0)+(12000/11e6+1280.0)+(12000/5.5e6+2560.0)+(12000/5.5e6+5120.0)+(12000/5.5e6+10240.0)+(8000/11e6)+(8000/11e6+640.0)+(8000/11e6+1280.0)=33.76 ms
Preferably, the WTRUs are sorted from greatest to smallest times at step S7-4. The program then advances to step S8. At step S8 (
The present invention also provides for the use of other metrics including: BSS-based load metrics; the number of associated WTRUs, the time that the Access Point (AP) receives all acknowledgements (ACKS) (e.g. fragmentation) related to that packet at the medium access control (MAC), and the average buffer MAC occupancy (based on the size of the buffer).
The present invention further provides a method that takes into account the load of the neighboring APs in assessing the system's need to perform any load shedding (i.e. disassociation) or load balancing. For example, as shown in
For advertising loading to its stations (WTRUs), an Access Point (AP) can compare its load relative to neighboring APs, i.e. AP(x) and AP(y), for example. When an AP load is high compared to the estimated load of its neighboring APs, then the AP advertises a high load responsive to a determination at step S15A (
Another method of the present invention is to use metrics that determine medium (i.e., channel) load. This metric enables the WTRU to choose the least loaded AP. Medium load metrics are used in cases when the In-BSS channel load is not effective, such as the case when a BSS with an In-BSS channel load could simply be deferring to a neighboring BSS, and therefore, although the load of the AP is low, the medium load is high. In this case, the advertised load should be representative of the medium load. In this case, an AP only advertises a low load when it is able to support the new WTRU.
A metric that gives an indication of the medium load is the average duration (Avg D) required to execute the backoff procedure that is determined in the manner shown in
The size of the contention window influences the duration needed to execute the backoff procedure. The contention window size is increased whenever an acknowledgement is not received from the receiving node. This aspect covers cases where collisions occur either between nodes of the same BSS or different BSSs. During the countdown of a backoff procedure, the countdown is suspended whenever the medium is sensed to be busy, which increases the duration of the backoff procedure. This additional aspect covers the cases when the medium is highly loaded due to WTRUs of the own BSS and/or neighboring BSSs. This metric taken alone provides a good indication of the congestion as perceived by this node in the BSS. One could consider simply using the time that the medium is busy (channel utilization) as a metric. However, in an example where only one WTRU is associated with the Access Point (AP) and is transmitting or receiving large amounts of data, the channel utilization metric will not give a good indication of the congestion. Channel utilization will indicate a high congestion when in fact the system is only supporting one user. A second user (WTRU) added to this AP could easily be supported. In the single user example, the new proposed Avg. D metric (i.e. the average duration to execute the backoff procedure) would correctly indicate low congestion.
The AvgD metric is a preferred measure since a short duration required for the backoff procedure indicates a lightly loaded medium, where a long duration indicates a heavily loaded medium. As an example, consider the current IEEE 802.11b standard. The minimum value for a contention window (CW) is 32×20 μsec=640 μsec, and the maximum value is 1023×2 μpsec=20.5 msec. However, the duration required to execute the backoff may be greater than the maximum size of the CW, caused by the suspension of the countdown due to sensing a busy medium. This increase in duration will give an indication in load due to the activity in the medium.
The reasons for the use of MAC loading measurements in the context of the present invention include:
The present invention also recognizes that there is need for WTRU uplink loading information and AP service loading information. Some of the limitations of CU information include:
The network has no current way to access unserved uplink traffic demand (queued traffic load).
The merits of WTRU uplink traffic loading measurements (UTLM) in network management include:
The present invention provides a new MAC management information base (MAC MIB) element for transmit traffic load, namely, Transmit Queue Size (TQS). Transmit Queue Size (TQS) is defined as follows: New MIB Information contains three (3) items: Total transmit queue size (TQS) consisting of the sum of Contention-free TQS (CFTQS) and Contention TQS (CFTQS).
TQS contains the current MAC queue size in bytes. TQS can be included in a MAC MIB 802.11 Counters Table. DotllCounters Table is a defined data structure in the standard. TQS information may be implemented by a counter as shown in
The WTRU, at step S29, transmits a frame employing the physical (PHY) layer when a session is initiated and, at step S30, decrements the TQS counter by the number of bytes transmitted, either when operating in the unacknowledged mode or when a frame is acknowledged by an AP after the PHY transmission. The WTRU, at step S31, communicates the TQS count to neighboring APs. TQS is a new MIB element. All MIB elements are transmitted to neighbors as needed via an MIB query performed to retrieve an element from a neighbor's MIB.
The contention transmit queue size (CTQS) is implemented as shown, for example, in
The WTRU, at step S36, transmits the frame (to an AP, for example) employing the PHY layer when operating either in the unacknowledged mode or when the frame has been acknowledged after PHY transmission and, at step S37, decrements the CTQS counter by the number of bytes transmitted either in unacknowledged mode or when the frame is acknowledged after a PHY layer transmission. At step S38 the WTRU communicates the CTQS count to neighboring APs.
The contention free transmit queue size (CFTQS) is implemented, as shown in
At step S40, the WTRU MAC layer receives a contention-free frame and, at step S41, queues the frame in the contention free queue (CFQ). At step S42, the WTRU increments the CFTQS counter by the number of bytes in the queued frame.
At step S43, the WTRU transmits a contention-free frame using the PHY layer and, at step S44, decrements the CFTQS counter by the number of bytes transmitted in the frame in the unacknowledged mode or when the frame is acknowledged after the PHY layer transmission. At step S45 the WTRU communicates the count to neighboring APs.
The considerations for providing AP service loading measurements in the context of the invention include the following:
WTRUs may consider multiple APs as target APs for handoff. If two APs have similar channel loading and acceptable signal quality, the WTRU needs a capability of being able to determine which is the better AP. By enabling APs to post information concerning their ability to serve their existing set of WTRUs and their ability to serve additional WTRUs, channel usage can be optimized. This information is similar to a downlink traffic queue measurement for the AP modified by any AP specific information concerning its anticipated capacity.
The following addresses AP Service Load:
A new MAC MIB information item is provided to assist WTRUs in their handoff decisions.
A quantitative indication on a 255-value scale (represented by 8 binary bits, for example), from “not currently serving any WTRU”, to “can't handle any new services” with a defined middle point indicating that the served load is optimal. For example:
0==Not serving any WTRU (idle AP or WTRU is not an AP)
1 through 254==scalar indication of AP Service Load.
255==unable to accept any new services
Exact specification of this MIB item is implementation-dependant and need not be specified with exactitude; a detailed definition to obtain maximum utility may be tailored to the characteristics of the particular network.
The new AP Service Load can be included in MAC dotllCounters Table or elsewhere in the MIB.
A WTRU having multiple APs that can be chosen as a target AP, in addition to a consideration of channel loading and acceptable signal quality, as shown in
The AP service load (SL) is a scalar value and may, for example, be based upon served and unserved traffic, as well as other data such as signal quality, and anticipated capacity, based on statistical data, for example. The AP SL scalar may be created, as shown in step S50A of
The above methods are preferably implemented in selectively configured WTRUs. For example, a WTRU can be configured to assist in channel management in a wireless network by providing a memory device, a processor and a transmitter. The memory device is preferably configured to provide a queue of data frames for a medium access control (MAC) layer of the WTRU. The processor is preferably configured to determine queue size data representing unserved, queued traffic demand at the respective WTRU. The transmitter is preferably configured to communicate the queue size data to access points (APs) of the wireless network whereby a receiving AP utilizes the queue size data to assist in channel management. In particular, the processor is configured to initialize at zero a count representing queued data size at system startup and to increment the count by a number of bytes in a frame when the frame is queued by the medium access control (MAC) layer of the WTRU. Preferably the processor is configured to decrement the count by a number of bytes in a frame when a frame is transmitted by a physical (PHY) layer of the WTRU in an unacknowledged mode. As an alternative, the processor can be configured to decrement the count by a number of bytes in a frame when a frame is transmitted by a physical (PHY) layer of the WTRU when the frame has been acknowledged after a PHY transmission.
In such a WTRU, the memory is preferably configured with contention and contention free queues of the medium access control (MAC) layer and the processor is configured to determine contention transmit queue-size (CTQS) data representing unserved, queued traffic demand for the contention queue, contention free transmit queue-size (CFTQS) data representing unserved, queued traffic demand for the contention free queue and total transmit queue-size (TQS) data representing unserved, queued traffic demand for all transmit data queues of a medium access control (MAC) layer.
Such a WTRU preferably also includes a receiver configured to receive from APs service load indicators formulated based on queue size data received from WTRUs by the APs and a controller configured to select an AP for wireless communication based on the received load indicators.
An access point (AP) can be provided configured to provide channel management in a wireless network for both access points (APs) and wireless transmit receive units (WTRUs) capable of wireless communications with the APs over wireless channels. A receiver is configured to receive unserved traffic demand data received from WTRUs located within a wireless service range of the AP. The AP preferably has a processor configured to calculate a service load indicator based on unserved traffic demand data received from WTRUs. A transmitter is included that is configured to advertise the service load indicator to WTRUs within the AP wireless service range whereby WTRUs located within the AP wireless service range of the AP can use the advertised service load indicator to assist in selection of an AP with which to conduct a wireless communication. In such an AP, the receiver is preferably configured to receive advertised service load indicators from other APs and the processor is preferably configured to use the advertised service load indicators received from other APs to assist in decisions regarding disassociating operatively associated WTRUs from communications with the AP.
In another embodiment, a wireless transmit receive unit (WTRU) is configured to manage congestion in a wireless communication system defined by a base service set (BBS). The WTRU has a processor configured to determine an in-base service set (in-BSS) deferral rate (DR) and average said DR over a given time interval. Preferably, the processor is configured to also determine packet error rate (PER) and average said PER over said time interval. A memory is configured to store comparative values reflecting wasted time spent trying to transmit data for each of the WTRUs operatively associated with the WTRU in the BSS. A transceiver is included that is configured to disassociate operatively associated WTRUs from the WTRU commencing with a WTRU having a stored comparative value reflective of the greatest time spent trying to transmit data when said average DR and said average PER are greater than given thresholds.
In such a WTRU, the processor is preferably configured to average the DR and the PER over a time interval of the order of thirty seconds and the transceiver is configured to periodically receive and update the memory with comparative values reflecting wasted time spent trying to transmit data for each WTRU operatively associated with the WTRU.
In such a WTRU, the processor may also be configured to determine a comparative wasted time value by measuring the time it takes the WTRU to receive either a successful acknowledge (ACK) or negative acknowledgment (NACK) responsive to a transmitted data packet, summing the measured times during a beacon period and normalizing the sum by the beacon period. The transceiver is then preferably configured to periodically transmit current comparative values reflecting wasted time spent trying to transmit data to other WTRUs.
An access point AP may also be configured to assist wireless transmit receive stations (WTRUs) in selecting an access point AP with which to conduct wireless communication in a wireless communication system by providing it with selectively configured components. Preferably, a receiver is configured to receiving advertised load indicators of other APs. A processor is included that is configured to compare a communication load of the AP with received advertised load indicators from other APs and to determine an adjusted load of the AP based on said comparison. A transmitter is configured to advertise the adjusted AP load to WTRUs. Preferably, the processor is configured to periodically perform said comparing and determining operations in order to update the load that transmitter advertises to WTRUs.
In such an AP, the transmitter may be configured to advertise a low load when the processor determines that the communication load of the AP is low compared to the advertised load of other APs and to advertise a high load when the processor determines that the communication load of the AP is high compared to the advertised load of other APs. Also, the processor can be configured to determine a communication load of the AP by measuring delay between a time when a data packet is ready for transmission and a time when the packet is actually transmitted to a WTRU, averaging said delay over a given period, and utilizing the average delay to indicate load.
In another embodiment, a base station is configured to disassociate WTRUs from operative association therewith when a congestion condition is detected in a wireless network. The base station has a processor configured to determine wasted time (Tw) spent attempting to transmit/retransmit unacknowledged packets for each associated WTRU and to normalize wasted time Tw for each associated WTRU over a given time period. A memory is provided that is configured to store a list of associated WTRUs and their respective normalized wasted times. A transceiver is configured to disassociate WTRUs to relieve said congestion based on their respective normalized wasted times whereby a WTRU having a greatest Tw is disassociated first. Preferably, the processor is configured to add a penalty to said Tw representing increasing delay associated with retransmissions such as by being configured to calculate wasted transmission time (Tw) of WTRUs according to the formula set forth above.
IEEE 802.11e supports several access categories such as, for example, voice, video, best effort, and background traffic. In one embodiment, the present invention preferably utilizes the AP service load per access category. The BSS Load element contains information on the current station population, traffic level, and service level in the BSS.
The Length field shall be set to the number of octets in the following fields. The Station Count field is interpreted as an unsigned integer that indicates the total number of STAs currently associated with this BSS. The Station Count field shall not be present in beacon or probe response frames if, purely by way of example, dot11QoSOptionImplemented, dot11QBSSLoadImplemented, and dot11RadioMeasurementEnabled are all true.
The Channel Utilization field is defined as the percentage of time the AP sensed the medium busy, as indicated by either the physical or virtual carrier sense mechanism. This percentage is represented as a moving average of ((channel busy time/(dot11ChannelUtilizationBeaconIntervals*dot11BeaconPeriod*1024))*255), where channel busy time is defined to be the number of microseconds during which the carrier sense mechanism has indicated a channel busy indication, and dot11ChannelUtilizationBeaconIntervals represents the number of consecutive beacon intervals during which the average should be calculated. The Channel Utilization field shall not be present in beacon or probe response frames if dot11QoSOptionImplemented, dot11QBSSLoadImplemented, and dotl1RadioMeasurementEnabled are all true.
The AP Service Load shall be a scalar indication of the relative level of service loading at an AP. A low value shall indicate more available service capacity than a higher value. The value 0 shall indicate that this AP is not currently serving any STA. The values between 0 and 254 shall be a logarithmically scaled representation of the average medium access delay for DCF transmitted packets measured from the time the DCF packet is ready for transmission (i.e. begins CSMA/CA access) until the actual packet transmission start time. A value of 1 shall represent a 50 μs delay while a value of 253 shall represent a 5.5 ms delay or any delay greater than 5.5 ms. The value 254 shall indicate no additional AP service capacity is available. The value 255 shall indicate that the AP Service Load is not available. The AP shall measure and average the medium access delay for all transmit packets using DCF access mechanism over a predetermined time window, such as a thirty second measurement window. The accuracy for the average medium access delay shall be +/−200 μs or better when averaged over at least 200 packets.
The Access Category (AC) Service Load elements may be provided in the BSS Load only at QoS enhanced APs (QAPs). The AC Service Load shall be a scalar indication of the Average Access Delay (AAD) at a QAP for services of the indicated Access Category. A low value shall indicate shorter access delay than a higher value. The value 0 shall indicate that this QAP is not currently providing services of the indicated AC. The values between 0 and 254 shall be a logarithmically scaled representation of the average medium access delay for transmitted packets in the indicated AC measured from the time the EDCF packet is ready for transmission (i.e. begins CSMA/CA access) until the actual packet transmission start time. A value of 1 shall represent a 50 μs delay while a value of 253 shall represent a 5.5 ms delay or any delay greater than 5.5 ms. The value 254 shall indicate that services at the indicated AC are currently blocked or suspended. The value 255 shall indicate that the AC Service Load is not available.
The QAP shall measure and average the medium access delay for all transmit packets of the indicated AC using EDCF access mechanism over a predetermined time window, such as a continuous thirty second measurement window. The accuracy for the average medium access delay shall be +/−200 μs or better when averaged over at least 200 packets. The AC Service load is preferably formatted as shown in
While this invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as described hereinabove.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/212,632 filed Aug. 18, 2011, which issued on Feb. 10, 2015 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,953,573, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/939,785 filed Sep. 13, 2004, which issued on Aug. 23, 2011 as U.S. Pat. No. 8,005,055, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/897,771 filed Jul. 23, 2004, which in turn claims priority from both U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/489,385 filed on Jul. 23, 2003, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/552,537 filed on Mar. 12, 2004, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60489385 | Jul 2003 | US | |
| 60552537 | Mar 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13212632 | Aug 2011 | US |
| Child | 14614513 | US | |
| Parent | 10939785 | Sep 2004 | US |
| Child | 13212632 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10897771 | Jul 2004 | US |
| Child | 10939785 | US |
