The present invention relates generally to ultra-wideband communication systems, and, in particular, to a receiver for use in an ultra-wideband communication system adapted to determine the angle of departure of an RF signal transmitted by an RF transmitter.
In general, in the descriptions that follow, we will italicize the first occurrence of each special term of art which should be familiar to those skilled in the art of ultra-wideband (“UWB”) communication systems. In addition, when we first introduce a term that we believe to be new or that we will use in a context that we believe to be new, we will bold the term and provide the definition that we intend to apply to that term. In addition, throughout this description, we will sometimes use the terms assert and negate when referring to the rendering of a signal, signal flag, status bit, or similar apparatus into its logically true or logically false state, respectively, and the term toggle to indicate the logical inversion of a signal from one logical state to the other. Alternatively, we may refer to the mutually exclusive boolean states as logic_0 and logic_1. Of course, as is well known, consistent system operation can be obtained by reversing the logic sense of all such signals, such that signals described herein as logically true become logically false and vice versa. Furthermore, it is of no relevance in such systems which specific voltage levels are selected to represent each of the logic states.
In prior art systems that calculate angle of arrival (“AoA”), such as those referenced in the First Related Patent, there are two or more receive antennas and one transmit antenna. A transmitter transmits an RF signal, e.g., a channel sounding signal, using the single transmit antenna. The receiver receives a portion of the transmitted signal via its first receive antenna. It then switches to receive another portion of the transmitted signal from the second receive antenna. It may thereafter continue to any remaining receive antennas. The receiver can now calculate a phase from each of the signal portions received from each of the several receive antennas as a function of the complex baseband impulse response (“CIR”) of the channel. These phases are then used to calculate the phase differences of arrival between one or more pairs of receive antennas. This phase difference of arrival can be used to calculate an angle of arrival. Alternatively, the phase difference of arrival can be used, in conjunction with a range, directly to calculate the (x,y) cartesian position of the transmit antenna with respect to the receive antennas.
In all of the prior art AoA systems known to us, either: each receiver must be provided with multiple, switchable receive antennas; or each receiver must, in fact, comprise multiple, cooperating receivers, each having a respective receive antenna. However, in general, modern RF communication devices, e.g., cell phones, have only a single antenna, and to add a second would significantly increase the cost and computational complexity.
In some applications, UWB signals are forbidden from being transmitted by fixed installations, but are allowed to be transmitted by mobile devices and are allowed to be received by fixed installations. In such applications, prior art AoA approaches simply will not work.
What is needed is a method and apparatus for use in an RF receiver for determining the angle of departure (“AoD”) of an RF signal transmitted by an RF transmitter. In particular, we submit that such a method and apparatus should provide performance generally comparable to the best prior art techniques but more efficiently than known implementations of such prior art techniques.
In accordance with one embodiment of our invention, we provide a method for use in a UWB communication system comprising a UWB transmitter and a UWB receiver. In particular, by way of example, the transmitter has first and second transmit antennae separated by a distance, d, and the receiver has a single receive antenna In accordance with our method, we first transmit a selected first portion of the signal using the first transmit antenna; and, upon receiving the transmitted first portion of the signal via the receive antenna, we develop a first phase value of the received first portion of the signal. Second, we transmit a selected second portion of the signal using the second transmit antenna; and, upon receiving the transmitted second portion of the signal via the receive antenna, we develop a second phase value of the received second portion of the signal. Finally, we develop a path difference value, p, as a function of the first and second phase values.
In one enhanced embodiment, we develop an angle of departure of the signal transmitted by the transmitter relative to the receiver as a function of d, r and p.
In one other enhanced embodiment, we determine a distance r between the receive antenna and a mid-point between the first transmit antenna and the second transmit antenna; and then develop an (x,y) Cartesian position of the transmitter relative to the receiver as a function of d, r and p.
In one other embodiment, we provide an angle of departure circuit configured to perform our method for determining angle of departure.
In another embodiment, we provide an RF receiver comprising an AoD circuit configured to perform our method for determining angle of departure.
In yet another embodiment, we provide an RF transceiver comprising an RF receiver comprising an AoD circuit configured to perform our method for determining angle of departure.
In still another embodiment, we provide an RF communication system comprising an RF transceiver comprising an RF receiver comprising an AoD circuit configured to perform our method for determining angle of departure.
The methods of our invention may be embodied in non-transitory computer readable code on a suitable computer readable medium such that when a processor executes the computer readable code, the processor executes the respective method.
Our invention may be more fully understood by a description of certain preferred embodiments in conjunction with the attached drawings in which:
In the drawings, similar elements will be similarly numbered whenever possible. However, this practice is simply for convenience of reference and to avoid unnecessary proliferation of numbers, and is not intended to imply or suggest that our invention requires identity in either function or structure in the several embodiments.
As illustrated in
As is well know in this art, each of the accumulated correlations comprise respective channel impulse response estimates. From each such estimate, a respective phase of departure (“PoD”) can be calculated using known techniques. A phase difference of departure (“PDoD”) can then be calculated as a function of the difference between the PoDs of each selected transmit antenna pairs. The AoD can now be calculated as a function of the PDoD. In one embodiment, if the distance between the transmitter 10 and receiver 12 is known, a priori, the PDOD can be used to calculate the (x,y) cartesian position of the transmit antennas.
In the scenario shown in
We can use well known methods to find the distance r between Antenna R and the mid-point between Antenna T1 and Antenna T2, e.g., by determining the time of flight of a signal transmitted from the transmitter 10 to the receiver 12.
Provided that the distance d between two transmit antennas is less than or equal to one-half wavelength (“λ”) of the radio signals received by Antenna R, the path difference p will always be somewhere between −λ/2 and +λ/2.
So, if we can measure the phase of arrival at Antenna R of each of the signals transmitted by Antenna T1 and Antenna T2, the phase difference going from −180° to +180° can give us a path difference varying from −λ/2 to +λ/2. We wish to find the (x,y) Cartesian location of the transmitter 10 with respect to the receiver 12. So, we can use known methods to find the distances x and y.
Using the cosine rule:
Using the cosine rule:
From [Eq. 4], substituting x′ and
Substitute f into [Eq. 2]
Solving for x gives:
Alternatively, substituting x
We can also find the angle of departure, γ, as:
So, using [Eq. 5] and [Eq. 6], or [Eq. 7] and [Eq. 8], we have calculated the (x,y) Cartesian position of the transmitter 10 relative to the receiver 12, and the angle of departure, γ. We just need to know:
One of the most accurate ways to get the path difference is to get the phase difference of departure of a signal in fractions of a cycle, and then multiply by the wavelength of the carrier.
Where θ is the phase difference expressed in radians.
Another way is to get the time difference of arrival of a signal and multiply by the speed of light. A third way is to get the difference in time of flight and then multiply by the speed of light.
We can see from
Let us consider why is it useful to determine angle of departure from the perspective of the transmitter rather than the traditional angle of arrival from the perspective of the receiver:
Although we have described our invention in the context of particular embodiments, one of ordinary skill in this art will readily realize that many modifications may be made in such embodiments to adapt either to specific implementations. For example, rather than calculating AoD using only a single pair of transmit antennas, additional transmit antennas may be provided, each selectively transmitting a respective portion of the RF signal. Further, the several elements described above may be adapted so as to be operable under either hardware or software control or some combination thereof, as is known in this art. Alternatively, the several methods of our invention as disclosed herein in the context of special purpose receiver apparatus may be embodied in computer readable code on a suitable non-transitory computer readable medium such that when a general or special purpose computer processor executes the computer readable code, the processor executes the respective method.
Thus it is apparent that we have provided a method and apparatus for determining the AoD of an RD signal transmitted by a multi-antenna transmitter to a single-antenna receiver. Although we have so far disclosed our invention only in the context of a packet-based UWB communication system, we appreciate that our invention is broadly applicable to other types of wireless communication systems, whether packed-based or otherwise, that perform channel sounding. Further, we submit that our invention provides performance generally comparable to the best prior art techniques but more efficiently than known implementations of such prior art techniques.
The subject matter of this Application is related to U.S. Provisional Application 62/800,468, filed 2 Feb. 2019 (“First Parent Provisional”). The subject matter of this Application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/974,412, filed 8 May 2018 (“First Related Patent Application”), now U.S. Pat. No. 10,509,116. The subject matter of this Application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 10,056,993, issued 21 Aug. 2018 (“First Related Patent”). The subject matter of the First Parent Provisional, First Related Patent Application, and the First Related patent, each in its entirety, is expressly incorporated herein by reference. This application claims priority to the First Parent Provisional, and hereby claims benefit of the filing date thereof pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.78(a)(4).
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4422076 | Tricoles et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4626860 | Tricoles et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4734702 | Kaplan | Mar 1988 | A |
6233459 | Sullivan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6317611 | Kobayakawa | Nov 2001 | B1 |
7349461 | Glazko et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7636397 | McLaughlin | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7787544 | McLaughlin | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8358709 | McLaughlin | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8677224 | McLaughlin et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8693286 | Rogers et al. | Apr 2014 | B1 |
9778340 | Mutz et al. | Oct 2017 | B2 |
10056993 | Clancy et al. | Aug 2018 | B2 |
10509116 | McLaughlin et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
20070085715 | McLaughlin | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070140323 | Patel et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159924 | Vook et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080112440 | Bedekar et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090243932 | Moshfeghi | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090310444 | Hiroe | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090316529 | Huuskonen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100087151 | Auer | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100097270 | Fukada | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20120276921 | Nemeth | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130163638 | McLaughlin et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140093023 | Park | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140204977 | Morche | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20160254889 | Shattil | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160259033 | Vladimirov | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170085293 | Marrow et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20190204432 | Safaripour | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190289568 | Pajovic | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190331781 | McLaughlin et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190331782 | McLaughlin et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190331783 | McLaughlin et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200334394 | Wodrich | Oct 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104484852 | Apr 2015 | CN |
2015051821 | Apr 2015 | WO |
2015176776 | Nov 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alexander, S.N., “Soviet Computer Technology—1959,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 3, Issue 3, Mar. 1960, pp. 131-166. |
Carr, J.W. et al., “A Visit to Computation Centers in the Soviet Union,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 2, Issue 6, Jun. 1959, pp. 8-20. |
Loeffler, A., “Localizing with Passive UHF RFID Tags Using Wideband Signals,” IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas and Electroic Systems (COMCAS), Nov. 7-9, 2011, Tel Aviv, Israel, IEEE, 6 pages. |
Manteuffel, D. et al., “Antenna and Propagation impairments of a UWB localization system integrated into an aircraft cabin,” 2010 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference, Nov. 8-9, 2010, Loughborough, UK, IEEE, pp. 589-592. |
Song, “A Low Complexity Asynchronous UWB TDOA Localization Method,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, nol. 2015, Article IDS 675490, Oct. 2015, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 11 pages. |
Wang, Z. et al., “A New Multi-Antenna Based LOS-NLOS Separation Technique,” 2009 IEEE 13th Digital Signal Processing Workshop and 5th IEEE Signal Processing Education Workshop, Jan. 4-7, 2009, Marco Island, FL, IEEE, pp. 331-336. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/375,739, dated Jun. 9, 2017, 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/375,739, dated Nov. 9, 2017, 14 pages. |
Applicant-Initiated Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 15/375,739, dated Mar. 1, 2018, 3 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/375,739, dated Jul. 17, 2018, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,412, dated Apr. 25, 2019, 9 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/974,412, dated Oct. 23, 2019, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/352,105, dated Aug. 25, 2020, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/352,105, dated Feb. 5, 2021, 13 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/352,372, dated Oct. 9, 2020, 13 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/352,372, dated Feb. 5, 2021, 15 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2013/070851, dated Jun. 4, 2014, 13 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2013/070851, dated Apr. 21, 2016, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2014/060722, dated Jan. 28, 2015, 10 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2014/060722, dated Dec. 8, 2016, 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/352,480, dated Apr. 21, 2021, 8 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/352,105, dated May 10, 2021, 3 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/352,105, dated Jul. 26, 2021, 10 pages. |
Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/352,372, dated May 19, 2021, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200252101 A1 | Aug 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62800468 | Feb 2019 | US |