Method and apparatus for determining the content of subterranean reservoirs

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6628119
  • Patent Number
    6,628,119
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 9, 2001
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 30, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
A system for determining the nature of a subterranean reservoir 12 whose position and geometry is known from previous seismic surveys. An electromagnetic field 24, 25, 26, 27 is applied by a transmitter 18 on the seabed 14 and detected by antennea 21, 22, 23 also on the seabed 14. The nature of the detected reflected waves 25, 26, 27 is used to determine whether the reservoir 12 contains water or hydrocarbons.
Description




The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for determining the nature of submarine and subterranean reservoirs. More particularly, the invention is concerned with determining whether a reservoir, whose approximate geometry and location are known, contains hydrocarbons or water.




Currently, the most widely used techniques for geological surveying, particularly in sub-marine situations, are seismic methods. These seismic techniques are capable of revealing the structure of the subterranean strata with some accuracy. However, whereas a seismic survey can reveal the location and shape of a potential reservoir, it cannot reveal the nature of the reservoir.




The solution therefore is to drill a borehole into the reservoir. However, the costs involved in drilling an exploration well tend to be in the region of £25 m and since the success rate is generally about 1 in 10, this tends to be a very costly exercise.




It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a system for determining, with greater certainty, the nature of a subterranean reservoir without the need to sink a borehole.




According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of determining the nature of a subterranean reservoir whose approximate geometry and location are known, which comprises: applying a time varying electromagnetic field to the strata containing the reservoir; detecting the electromagnetic wave field response; and analysing the effects on the characteristics of the detected field that have been caused by the reservoir, thereby determining the content of the reservoir, based on the analysis.




According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided apparatus for determining the nature of a subterranean reservoir whose approximate geometry and location are known comprising: means for applying a time varying electromagnetic field to the strata containing the reservoir; means for detecting the electromagentic wave field response, and means for analysing the effects on the detected field that have been caused by the reservoir, thereby enabling the content of the reservoir to be determined based on the analysis.




It has been appreciated by the present applicants that while the seismic properties of oil-filled strata and water-filled strata do not differ significantly, their electromagnetic resistivities/permittivities do differ. Thus, by using an electromagnetic surveying method, these differences can be exploited and the success rate in predicting the nature of a reservoir can be increased significantly. This represents potentially an enormous cost saving.




The technique is applicable in exploring land-based subterranean reservoirs but is especially applicable to submarine, in particular sub-sea, subterranean reservoirs. Preferably the field is applied using one or more stationary transmitters located on the earth's surface, and the detection is carried out by one or more stationary receivers located on the earth's surface. In a preferred application, the transmitter(s) and/or receivers are located on or close to the seabed or the bed of some other area of water. Conveniently, there will be a single transmitter and an array of receivers, the transmitter(s) and receivers being dipole antennae or coils, though other forms of transmitter/receivers can be used. Also, if improved directionality of the emitted field is desirable, then a plurality of transmitters with phase adjustment can be used.




Electromagnetic surveying techniques in themselves are known. However, they are not widely used in practice. In general, the reservoirs of interest are about 1 km or more below the sea bed. In order to carry out electromagnetic surveying in these conditions, with any reasonable degree of resolution, short wavelengths are necessary. Unfortunately, such short wavelengths suffer from very high attenuation. Long wavelengths do not provide adequate resolution. For these reasons, seismic techniques are preferred.




However, while longer wavelengths applied by electromagnetic techniques cannot provide sufficient information to provide an accurate indication of the boundaries of the various strata, if the geological structure is already known, they can be used to determine the nature of a particular identified formation, if the possibilities for the nature of that formation have significantly differing electromagnetic characteristics. The resolution is not particularly important and so longer wavelengths which do not suffer from excessive attenuation can be employed.




The resistivity of sea water is about 0.3 ohm-m and that of the overburden beneath the sea bed would typically be from 0.3 to 4 ohm-m, for example about 2 ohm-m. However, the resisitivty of an oil reservoir is likely to be about 50 ohm-m. This large difference can be exploited using the techniques of the present invention. Typically, the resisitvity of a hydrocarbon-bearing formation will be 20 to 400 times greater than water-bearing formation.




Due to the different electromagnetic properties of a gas/oil bearing formation and a water bearing formation, one can expect a reflection of the transmitted field at the boundary of a gas/oil bearing formation. However, the similarity between the properties of the overburden and a reservoir containing water means that no reflection is likely to occur.




The transmitted field may be pulsed, however, a coherent continuous wave with stepped frequencies is preferred. It may be transmitted for a significant period of time, during which the transmitter should preferably be stationary, and the transmission stable. Thus, the field may be transmitted for a period of time from 30 seconds to 60 minutes, preferably from 3 to 30 minutes, for example about 20 minutes. Preferably, the receivers are arranged to detect a direct wave and a wave reflected from the reservoir, and the analysis includes extracting phase and amplitude data of the reflected wave from corresponding data from the direct wave.




The direct wave, which progresses via the sea water and the surface layers of the overburden, will reach the receivers first and will be much stronger than the later reflected waves. In an alternative system, therefore, the direct wave may be suppressed, using known techniques. This means that the receivers used will not require such a large dynamic range.




Preferably, the wavelength of the transmission is given by the formula






0.1


s


≦λ≦10


s;








where λ is the wavelength of the transmission through the overburden and s is the distance from the seabed to the reservoir. More preferably λ is from about 0.5 s to 2 s. This may be achieved by adopting a transmission frequency from 0.1 Hz to 1 kHz, preferably from 1 to 50 Hz, for example 20 Hz.




In a preferred regime, a first transmission is made at a first frequency and received by each receiver in a tuned array of receivers, then a second transmission is made at a second frequency and received by the same tuned array of receivers, the receivers being tuned to receive their respective transmission. This would probably be repeated several more times, though it may only be carried out once.




Preferably, the analysis includes comparing the results of the measurements taken with the results of a mathematical simulation model based on the known properties of the reservoir and overburden conditions.




Preferably, the distance between the transmitter and a receiver is given by the formula






0.5λ≦l≦10λ;






where λ is the wavelength of the transmission through the overburden and l is the distance between the transmitter and the first receiver.




Given that the distance s and the geometry of the reservoir will be known from previous seismic surveys, an optimum λ and l would be selected.




Where dipole antennae are used these may be fixed, however, they are preferably adapted antennae which can be tuned for optimum transmission and reception in dependence upon the frequency of the transmission and its wavelength through the overburden. This may be achieved by altering their effective length either by remote controlled relays or by electronic switching systems. In addition, the driving circuit may be tuned in order to increase the bandwidth.




Preferably, the analysing means is arranged to analyse phase and amplitude.




If a location of interest is considered, a mathematical modelling operation may be carried out. Thus, the various relevant parameters, such as depth and expected resistivities of the various known strata in the overburden are applied to the mathematical model and the expected results are calculated in dependence upon whether a formation under consideration is oil-bearing or water-bearing. The theoretically predicted results can then be compared with the actual results achieved in the field in order to determine the nature of the formation.




The present invention also extends to a method of surveying subterranean measures which comprises; performing a seismic survey to determine the geological structure of a region; and where that survey reveals the presence of a subterranean reservoir, subsequently performing a method as described above.











The invention may be carried into practice in various ways and some embodiments will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a schematic section of a system in accordance with the invention.





FIG. 1

shows a section through a region which has already been the subject of a seismic survey. The geological structure is known and consists of several strata which form an overburden


11


above a reservoir layer


12


and underlying strata


13


. The top of the overburden is a seabed


14


above which is, of course, sea water


15


.











In order to determine whether or not the reservoir layer


12


is hydrocarbon-bearing, an electromagnetic surveying technique is carried out. A vessel


16


lays a cable


17


on the seabed


14


. The cable


17


includes an electromagnetic transmitter


18


and several receivers in the form of dipole antennae, three of which


21


,


22


,


23


are shown.




The thickness s of the overburden


11


is known to be 1000 m. The depth of the water is about 800 m, though this is of no particular significance. Under these circumstances, the distance l between the transmitter


18


and the middle antenna


22


is arranged to be 2000 m, i.e. 2 s. The distance between adjacent antennae is about 100 m. In all, the length of the cable


17


is likely be about 4000 m.




When the cable


17


is in position on the seabed


14


, the transmitter


18


is activated and transmits an electromagnetic field in the form of a wave. The transmission frequency is in the range of about 1 to 30 Hz and the specific value is selected to produce a wavelength λ in the overburden which is approximately equal to s, that is to say, λ≅1000 m. The transmitter


18


is tuned for optimum transmission and the antennae


21


-


23


are tuned to receive transmissions at λ=1000 m. The antennae


21


-


23


receive a direct wave


24


from the transmitter and also respective reflected waves


25


,


26


,


27


which are reflected by the reservoir layer


12


if the layer


12


is hydrocarbon-bearing. The received direct wave


24


and received reflected waves


25


-


27


are analysed and compared with for example the results of forward modelling calculations based on the seismics and typical overburden electrical characteristics and from the results, a judgement can be made as to the nature of the layer


12


.




Typically, a frequency of 20 Hz might be selected initially. This would result in a wavelength of 400 m in the sea water and a wavelength of about 1000 m in the overburden. The wavelength in the layer


12


, if hydrocarbon-bearing would be about 5000 m. Under these circumstances, the attenuation would be:






















Direct Wave









Antenna loss




−40 dB







Propagation loss




−110 dB







Reflected Wave







Antenna loss




−40 dB







Propagation loss




−150 dB







Reflection loss




−20 dB















The demanded dynamic range of the receiver system will then be 210 dB−150 dB=60 dB. By appropriate suppression of the direct wave, this demand will decrease dramatically and the resolution of the reflected signal will possibly be increased.




The transmission would be carried out for several minutes at a continuous power level of perhaps 10 kw.




This procedure is then repeated at a different frequency. This would result in different wavelengths and possibly consequent re-tuning of the antennae system. At a frequency of for example 5 Hz, the wavelength in sea water would be 800 m and the wavelength in the overburden, about 2000 m. The wavelength in the layer


12


, if hydrocarbon-bearing, would be 10 km. The attenuation would be:






















Direct Wave









Antenna loss




−40 dB







Propagation loss




−55 dB







Reflected Wave







Antenna loss




−40 dB







Propagation loss




−75 dB







Reflection loss




−30 dB















The demand for dynamic range of receiver system is now 145 dB−95 dB=50 dB.




In a preferred regime, the frequency would be increased stepwise over a range, for example 5 to 20 Hz.




The entire procedure can then be repeated in different locations and at different orientations. It will also be appreciated that by repeating the procedure after a period of production, the change in condition of a reservoir can be determined. This can be of value in assessing the positions in a particular field where hydrocarbons might still be present, and where the well might be depleted.



Claims
  • 1. A method of determining the nature of a submarine or subterranean reservoir having an electromagnetic characteristic and whose approximate geometry and location are known, which comprises:applying a time varying electromagnetic field in the form of a wave to the strata containing the reservoir; detecting the electromagnetic wave field response: and analysing the effects on the characteristics of the detected field that have been caused by the reservoir, thereby determining the content of the reservoir, based on the analysis, wherein the analysis comprises comparing the electromagnetic characteristic theoretically predicted for the reservoir based on the approximate geometry of the reservoir and based on the reservoir being a water-bearing or hydrocarbon-bearing reservoir to the electromagnetic characteristic for the reservoir that is determined from the detected electromagnetic wave field response of the reservoir, wherein a distance between a transmitter and a receiver is given by the formula 0.5λ≦l≦10λ; where λ is the wavelength of the transmission through an overburden and l is the distance between the transmitter and the receiver.
  • 2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the field is applied using at least one stationary transmitter located on the earth's surface.
  • 3. The method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the at least one transmitter is located proximate a bed of a body of water, the bed including a seabed.
  • 4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the detection is carried out by at least one stationary receiver located on the earth's surface.
  • 5. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the at least one receiver is located proximate a bed of a body of water, the bed including a seabed.
  • 6. The method as claimed in claim 4, in which the at least one stationary receivers is arranged to detect a direct wave and a wave reflected from the reservoir, and the analysis includes extracting phase and amplitude data of the reflected wave from corresponding data from the direct wave.
  • 7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the wavelength of the applied time varying electromagnetic field wave is given by the formula0.1 s≦λ≦10 s; where λ is the wavelength of the transmission through an overburden overlying a reservoir and s is the distance from a seabed to the reservoir.
  • 8. The method as claimed in claim 1, in which, substantially,1=2 s=2λ, wherein s is a distance from a seabed located over the reservoir to the reservoir.
  • 9. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the field is transmitted for a period of time of from 3 minutes to 30 minutes.
  • 10. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the transmission frequency of the time varying electromagnetic field is from 0.1 Hz to 1 kHz.
  • 11. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the transmission frequency of the time varying electromagnetic field is from 1 to 50 Hz.
  • 12. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the analysis includes comparing the results of measurements taken with results of a mathematical simulation model based on known properties of the reservoir and conditions of an overburden.
  • 13. The method as claimed in claim 1, including suppressing a direct wave, thereby reducing the required dynamic range of receivers receiving a reflected wave and increasing resolution of the reflected wave.
  • 14. The method of claim 1 including as preliminary steps; performing a seismic survey to determine the geological structure of a region and analyzing the survey to reveal the presence of a subterranean reservoir.
  • 15. The method of claim 1 wherein the electromagnetic characteristic theoretically predicted for the reservoir is a member of the group consisting of resistivity and permittivity.
  • 16. The method of claim 1 wherein the geometry of the reservoir includes a depth from a seabed to the reservoir.
  • 17. The method of claim 16 wherein the electromagnetic characteristic theoretically predicted for the reservoir is predicted for the depth and is a member of the group consisting of resistivity and permittivity.
  • 18. A method of determining the nature of a submarine or subterranean reservoir having an electromagnetic characteristic and whose approximate geometry and location are known, which comprises:applying a time varying electromagnetic field to the strata containing the reservoir; detecting the electromagnetic wave field response; and analyzing the effects on the characteristics of the detected field that have been caused by the reservoir, thereby determining the content of the reservoir, based on the analysis, wherein the analysis comprises comparing the electromagnetic characteristic theoretically predicted for the reservoir based on the approximate geometry of the reservoir and based on the reservoir being a water-bearing or hydrocarbon-bearing reservoir to the electromagnetic characteristic for the reservoir that is determined from the detected electromagnetic wave field response of the reservoir, in which a first transmission by at least one transmitter is made at a first frequency and is received by each receiver in a tuned array of receivers, then a second transmission is made at a second frequency and received by the same tune array of receivers, the receivers being tuned to receive their respective transmission, the at least one transmitter being tuned for optimum transmission.
  • 19. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the at least one transmitter is located on the earth's surface.
  • 20. The method as claimed in claim 19, wherein the at least one transmitter is located proximate a bed of a body of water, the bed including a seabed.
  • 21. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the detection is carried out by at least one stationary receiver located on the earth's surface.
  • 22. The method as claimed in claim 21, wherein the at least one receiver is located proximate a bed of a body of water, the bed including a seabed.
  • 23. The method as claimed in claim 22, in which the receivers are arranged to detect a direct wave and a wave reflected from the reservoir, and the analysis includes extracting phase and amplitude data of the reflected wave from corresponding data from the direct wave.
  • 24. The method as claimed in claim 23 wherein the wavelength of the transmitted wave is given by the formula0.1 s≦λ≦10 s; where λ is the wavelength of the transmission through an overburden overlying a reservoir and s is the distance from a seabed to the reservoir.
  • 25. The method as claimed in claim 24, in which, substantially, 1=2 s=2λ, wherein s is a distance from a seabed located over the reservoir to the reservoir.
  • 26. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the applied time varying electromagnetic field is in the form of a wave.
  • 27. The method as claimed in claim 26, including suppressing a direct wave, thereby reducing the required dynamic range of receivers receiving a reflected wave and increasing resolution of the reflected wave.
  • 28. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the field is transmitted for a period of time of from 30 seconds to 60 minutes.
  • 29. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the field is transmitted for a period of time of from 3 minutes to 30 minutes.
  • 30. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the transmission frequency of the time varying electromagnetic field is from 0.1 Hz to 1 kHz.
  • 31. The method as claimed in claim 30, wherein the transmission frequency of the time varying electromagnetic field is from 1 to 50 Hz.
  • 32. The method as claimed in claim 18, wherein the analysis includes comparing the results of measurements taken with results of a mathematical simulation model based on known properties of the reservoir and conditions of an overburden.
  • 33. The method of claim 18 including as preliminary steps; performing a seismic survey to determine the geological structure of a region and analyzing the survey to reveal the presence of a subterranean reservoir.
  • 34. The method of claim 18 wherein the electromagnetic characteristic theoretically predicted for the reservoir is a member of the group consisting of resistivity and permittivity.
  • 35. The method of claim 18 wherein the geometry of the reservoir includes a depth from a seabed to the reservoir.
  • 36. The method of claim 35 wherein the electromagnetic characteristic theoretically predicted for the reservoir is predicted for the depth and is a member of the group consisting of resistivity and permittivity.
  • 37. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the field is transmitted for a period of time of from 30 seconds to 60 minutes.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
9818875 Aug 1998 GB
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/GB99/02823 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO00/13046 3/9/2000 WO A
US Referenced Citations (54)
Number Name Date Kind
2077707 Melton Apr 1937 A
2531088 Thompson Nov 1950 A
3052836 Postma Sep 1962 A
3806795 Morey Apr 1974 A
3836960 Gehman et al. Sep 1974 A
4010413 Daniel Mar 1977 A
4047098 Duroux Sep 1977 A
4079309 Seeley Mar 1978 A
4258321 Neale, Jr. Mar 1981 A
4258322 Rocroi et al. Mar 1981 A
4308499 Thierbach et al. Dec 1981 A
4417210 Rocroi et al. Nov 1983 A
4446434 Sternberg et al. May 1984 A
4451789 Meador May 1984 A
4506225 Loveless et al. Mar 1985 A
4547733 Thoraval Oct 1985 A
4594551 Cox et al. Jun 1986 A
4616184 Lee et al. Oct 1986 A
4617518 Srnka Oct 1986 A
4633182 Dzwinel Dec 1986 A
4652829 Safinya Mar 1987 A
4677438 Michiguchi et al. Jun 1987 A
4760340 Denzau et al. Jul 1988 A
4835474 Parra et al. May 1989 A
5025218 Ramstedt Jun 1991 A
5177445 Cross Jan 1993 A
5192952 Johler Mar 1993 A
5280284 Johler Jan 1994 A
5373443 Lee et al. Dec 1994 A
5400030 Duren et al. Mar 1995 A
H1490 Thompson et al. Sep 1995 H
5486764 Thompson et al. Jan 1996 A
H1524 Thompson et al. Apr 1996 H
H1561 Thompson Jul 1996 H
5563513 Tasci Oct 1996 A
5689068 Locatelli et al. Nov 1997 A
5767679 Schroder Jun 1998 A
5811973 Meyer, Jr. Sep 1998 A
5841280 Yu et al. Nov 1998 A
5877995 Thompson et al. Mar 1999 A
5886526 Wu Mar 1999 A
5892361 Meyer, Jr. et al. Apr 1999 A
5955884 Payton et al. Sep 1999 A
6002357 Redfern et al. Dec 1999 A
6023168 Minerbo Feb 2000 A
6060885 Tabarovsky et al. May 2000 A
6157195 Vail, III Dec 2000 A
6163155 Bittar Dec 2000 A
6184685 Paulk et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188221 Van de Kop et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188222 Seydoux et al. Feb 2001 B1
6225806 Millar et al. May 2001 B1
6246240 Vail, III Jun 2001 B1
6339333 Kuo Jan 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
2479992 Oct 1981 FR
WO 8101617 Jun 1981 WO
0087271 Aug 1983 WO
2155182 Sep 1985 WO
0219234 Apr 1987 WO
0512756 Nov 1991 WO
2256715 Dec 1992 WO
WO 9606367 Feb 1996 WO
2301902 Dec 1996 WO
0814349 Dec 1997 WO
9828638 Jul 1998 WO
WO 0000850 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0013037 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0013046 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0063718 Oct 2000 WO
WO0155749 Aug 2001 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (14)
Entry
Greaves et al., “New Dimensions in Geophysics for Reservoir Monitoring”, pp. 141-150.
Ellingsrud et al., “How Electromagnetic Sounding Technique Could be Coming to Hydrocarbon E & P”, 20 First Break (Mar. 2002).
Eidesmo et al., “Sea Bed Logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarbon filled layers in deepwater areas”, 20 First Break (Mar. 2002).
Kaufman et al., “EM Field of an Electric Dipole on the Surface of a Medium Containing a Thin Resistant Layer”, Frequency and Transient Soundings, publ. Elsevier, (1983).
Kaufman et al., 1981 Annual Meeting Abstracts: Marine EM Prospecting System, 47 Geophysics 431 (1982).
Garg et al., “Synthetic Electric Sounding Surveys Over Known Oil Fields”, 49 Geophysics 1959-67 (Nov. 1984).
Yuan et al., “The Assessment of Marine Gas Hydrates Through Electrical Remote Sounding: Hydrate Without a BSR?”, 27 Geophys. Res. Letts. 204-217 (Aug. 15, 2000).
Edwards, “On the Resource evaluation of Marine Gas Hydrate Deposits Using Sea-Floor Transient Electric Dipole-Dipole Methods”, 62 Geophysics 63-74 (Jan. 1997).
Chave et al., “Some Comments on Seabed Propagation of ULF/ELF Electromagnetic Fields”, 25 Radio Science 825-36 (Sep. 1990).
MacGregor et al., “Use of Marine Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Sounding for Sub-Basalt Exploration”, 48 Geophys. Prosp. 1091-1106 (Apr. 2000).
MacGregor et al., “Marine Controlled Source Electromagnetic Sounding: Development of a Regularized Inversion for 2-Dimensional Resistivity Structures”, 1 LITHOS Science Report 103-109 (Apr. 1999).
MacGregor et al., “The RAMESSES Experiment—III. Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Sounding of the Reykjanes Ridge”, 135 Geophys. J. Int. 773-89 (Jul. 1998).
Sinah et al., “Magmatic Processes at Slow Spreading Ridges: Implications of the RAMESSES Experiment at 57 deg. 45′N on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, ” 135 Geophys. J. Int. 731-45 (Jul. 1998).
Sinah et al., “Evidence for Accumulated Melt Beneath the Slow-Spreading Mid-Atlantic Ridge,” 355 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 233-53 (Jan. 1997).