Methods and apparatus have been developed for treating atrial fibrillation by creating lines of ablation or scar tissue that are intended to pose an interruption in the path of errant electrical impulses in the heart tissue. Scar tissue may be created by, e.g., surgical cutting of the tissue, freezing of the tissue by cryogenic probe, heating the tissue via RF energy and other technologies. Methods and apparatus for creating transmural lines of scar tissue or ablation using RF energy are shown and described in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,517,536, U.S. Pat. No. 6,974,454, and U.S. Pat. No. 7,393,353, which are incorporated herein by reference. The effectiveness of the ablation line at interrupting transmission of electrical signals is often associated, at least in part, with the transmurality of the line of ablation or scar tissue. Complete transmurality (fully through the thickness of the tissue) provides the most effective barrier. Partial or insufficient transmurality can allow undesired passage of aberrant electrical pulses.
Various methods for determining the efficacy of the lines of ablation have been developed using pacing and sensing electrodes. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,905,498, also incorporated herein by reference, discloses an RF ablation clamp in which the jaws of the clamp have a pacing electrode positioned so as to be on one side of a line of ablation formed by the instrument and a sensing or EKG electrode positioned on a jaw on the opposite side of the line of ablation. Accordingly, if a pacing pulse or signal is applied to cardiac tissue on one side of the line of ablation, but not sufficiently detected by the EKG sensor on the other side of the line of ablation, the line of ablation may be deemed effective for blocking the errant electrical impulses associated with atrial fibrillation.
The present application discloses a method and apparatus for determining the efficacy of a lesion for blocking electrical signals with the use of a plurality of electrodes. More specifically, a method is provided for assessing the degree of electrical signal blockage, or transmurality, of a line of ablation in which at least a first electrode adapted to deliver an electrical impulse is located on the first or one side of a line of ablation. At least second and third electrodes adapted to detect an electrical impulse are located on the second side of the line of ablation generally opposite to the first electrode, with the second electrode being spaced from the line of ablation a first distance and the third electrode being spaced from the line of ablation a second distance greater than the first distance. Each electrode may also be made up of more than one electrode, such as an electrode pair, to better assure reliability and tissue contact.
Once the electrodes are located in contact with the tissue in question, an electrical impulse is delivered to the target tissue by the first electrode (also called the pacing or stimulus electrode) and detected by the second and third electrodes (also called the EKG or sensing electrodes). Depending upon whether the line of ablation allows passage of electrical pulses, the second and third electrodes will detect the electrical impulse sequentially, with the order and/or timing of detection depending upon whether the electrical signal is able to directly cross the line of ablation or has to travel around the line of ablation to reach the second and third electrodes. Specifically, if the second electrode that is located closer to the line of ablation detects the electrical impulse prior to it being detected by the third electrode, then the line of ablation is not sufficiently transmural to block errant electrical impulses, as the electrical impulse has traveled directly across the line of ablation from the first electrode to the second electrode and then to the third electrode. On the other hand, if the third electrode detects the electrical impulse prior to it being detected by the second electrode, then the line of ablation is effective for directly blocking errant electrical impulses, as the electrical impulse has had to travel along or around the heart until it bypasses the ablation line to reach the second and third electrodes, and not through the line of ablation.
In another aspect, a device is provided for performing the method. The illustrated device preferably comprises a deflectable, steerable end effector having at least first, second and third electrodes located thereon for contacting the tissue. The second and third electrode comprise a first group or array of electrodes, with the distance between the first electrode and the first group or array of electrodes (comprising the second and third electrodes) being sufficient to accommodate therebetween a line of ablation made in the tissue. The second and third electrodes are adapted for detecting an electrical impulse while the first electrode is adapted for delivering an electrical impulse. Preferably, an analyzer with associated display or user interface is provided for determining and providing an indication of the activation sequence and or timing of the second and third electrodes in response to an electrical impulse delivered by the first electrode.
In a further aspect, a fourth electrode is provided adjacent the first electrode such that the first and fourth electrodes comprise a second group or array of electrodes. The first group or array of electrodes is spaced from the second group or array of electrodes a distance sufficient to accommodate therebetween the line ablation in the tissue. In this embodiment, the electrodes in each group are selectively either electrodes adapted for detecting electrical impulse or electrodes adapted for delivering an electrical impulse. Once again, an analyzer with an associated display or user interface is provided that is adapted to determine and provide an indication of the activation sequence of the electrodes in the group that is adapted for detecting the electrical impulse delivered by at least one of the electrodes in the group that is adapted to deliver an electrical impulse. By means of this embodiment, the efficacy of a lesion may be tested bi-directionally (i.e., with either group of electrodes being used for delivering or detecting electrical impulses), without the need to relocate or reposition the end effector.
In a preferred embodiment, each electrode comprises a pair of closely-spaced electrodes. In a specific embodiment, each electrode has a width of approximately 1 mm, with the electrodes in each pair being spaced approximately 1.5 mm. The pair of electrodes in each group are spaced approximately 10 mm apart, while the first group of electrodes are spaced approximately 15 mm from the second group of electrodes.
In accordance with the present disclosure, a method and a device are provided for determining the efficacy of a lesion for blocking electrical impulses. The method and device preferably utilizes at least three electrodes (and preferably at least three pairs of closely-spaced electrodes) to determine the efficacy of a lesion. This is done by locating one of the electrodes (or electrode pairs) on one side of the lesion and the other two electrodes (or electrode pairs) on the other side of the lesion and using the time it takes for an electrical impulse generated by the one electrode to be detected by the other two electrodes to provide an indication of the efficacy of the lesion for blocking electrical impulses. The sequence and/or timing of activation of the second and third electrodes indicates the direction the electrical impulse has had to travel—either directly across the line of ablation (if the lesion is not sufficiently transmural) or in generally the opposite direction around the heart (if the lesion is sufficiently transmural).
Turning to
In one embodiment, the end effector 16 is sufficiently flexible so as to be capable of forming a two-inch diameter, 150° arc over its 7.5 cm of length, with the bending resistance preferably being substantially constant throughout the range of motion. The end effector 16 may be deflectable in any suitable manner and, as illustrated, is deflectable by means of a rotatable knob 22 on the handle 12 that may cooperate with one or more pull wires that extend through the shaft 14, as is generally known in the art. Preferably, a two pull wire system is used for steering, with a first pull wire to control the radius of curvature of the end effector 16 and a second pull wire to pivot the end effector 16 with respect to a longitudinal axis.
In one preferred embodiment, the end effector 16 is provided with four electrodes (or electrode pairs) 24, 26, 28, and 30 for contacting the tissue to be tested. However, the number of electrodes (or electrode pairs) may be varied. While four electrodes are shown in the embodiment of
With reference to
A control may be provided on the handle 12 for selecting which group of electrodes 32 or 34 will serve as the sending or pacing electrodes and as the receiving or EKG electrodes. The control may take the form of a rocker, toggle or slide switch 36 that may be thumb actuated. As illustrated, power is delivered to the pacing electrodes through a cord 38, which also houses the electrical conductors for transmitting the signals received by the EKG electrodes to an analyzer (seen in
With reference to
Returning to
As shown, the stimulus/pacing generator 60 and power supply 62 are separate from the hand piece. Optionally, the stimulus/pacing generator and power supply may be incorporated into the hand piece, in which case the entire system becomes self-contained, and no connecting wires or cables or external power source are necessary. Under such circumstances, the power supply may be a non-replaceable battery that is connected to the system when, e.g., a tab is pulled, thus limiting the use of the device to a single surgical procedure.
With reference to
Specifically, the circuit 66 includes a first switch 80 connected to the stimulus or pacing generator and selectively connecting either the proximal pair 30a, 30b or distal pair 24a, 24b of the electrodes thereto. A second switch 82 connects a first EKG channel to one of the two inner pairs of electrodes 26a, b or 28a, b, and a third switch 84 selectively connects a second EKG channel to one of the proximal and distal pairs of electrodes 24a, b or 30a, b. Operation of the three switches is simultaneous such that the electrodes connected to the pacing generator will be in one of the groups 32, 34 of electrodes and the two electrodes connected to the EKG channels will be in the other group of electrodes. By using the switch 36, the user will develop an intuitive feel for whether the pacing pulses are being applied to the distal or proximal electrodes, making a visual indication of such status unnecessary.
As an alternative, the switching circuit can be modified to provide for three pairs of sensing electrodes to be used in combination with either a single pair of pacing electrodes or an entirely separate and self-contained pacing device. The use of the third pair of sensing electrodes allows for the determination of the angle at which the pacing impulse is received. Specifically, the use of two sensing points indicates which one of two directions an electrical impulse is moving. The addition of the third sensing point, with the relative positions of the sensing points being fixed and the appropriate sensing equipment to measure the timing, allows the determination of the angle at which the electrical impulse is passing the sensing points.
One particular use of a device such as that described above to determine the efficacy of a lesion is shown in
A device having an end effector 16 in accordance with the present disclosure is provided. The end effector 16 shown in
A pacing pulse is delivered to the heart 90 through the electrodes 24a, b. If the trigone lesion 98 is sufficiently effective to block electrical signals (i.e., transmural), the pacing pulse cannot cross and, in order to be detected by the EKG electrodes, must travel around the back of the heart, where it would first be detected by electrode pair 30a, b and later by electrode pair 28a, b. The analyzer 40 determines the sequence of activation of the electrode pairs, and provides an indication thereof. If the sequence of activation is first electrode pair 30a, b and then the electrode pair 28a, b, the lesion 98 is deemed transmural. If the sequence of activation is first electrode pair 28a, b and then electrode pair 30a, b, the lesion is deemed to be not transmural or not sufficiently formed to block electrical signals.
The lesion 98 may then be tested from the opposite direction without moving end effector in order to confirm the determination of transmurality. This may be accomplished by switching the device so that electrode pair 30a, b serves as the sending or pacing electrode, and the electrode pairs 24a, b and 26a, b serve as the receiving or EKG electrodes. Thus, the device may be used bi-directionally to test the transmurality of a lesion.
After a first lesion is tested, the end effector may be manipulated so that the first and second groups 32, 34 of electrodes straddle a different lesion, and the testing of that lesion is conducted as set forth above.
Thus, a method and apparatus for determining the efficacy of a lesion for blocking electrical signals. While the method and apparatus have been described in the context of certain preferred embodiments, there is no intent to limit this application to the same. Instead, the method and apparatus are to be defined by the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/121,586 filed Dec. 11, 2008, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61121586 | Dec 2008 | US |