Method and apparatus for determining the nature of subterranean reservoirs

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7202669
  • Patent Number
    7,202,669
  • Date Filed
    Monday, December 12, 2005
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 10, 2007
    17 years ago
Abstract
A system for detecting or determining the nature of a subterranean reservoir. An electromagnetic field is applied using a dipole antenna transmitter and this is detected using a dipole antenna receiver. The measurements are taken with the antenna both in-line and parallel and the difference between the two sets of measurements is exploited. A characteristic difference indicates a high resistive layer, which corresponds to a hydrocarbon reservoir.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for determining the nature of submarine and subterranean reservoirs. The invention is particularly suitable for determining whether a reservoir, whose approximate geometry and location are known, contains hydrocarbons or water, though it can also be applied to detecting reservoirs with particular characteristics.


BACKGROUND ART

Currently, the most widely used techniques for geological surveying, particularly in submarine situations, are seismic methods. These seismic techniques are capable of revealing the structure of the subterranean strata with some accuracy. However, whereas a seismic survey can reveal the location and shape of a potential reservoir, it cannot reveal the nature of the reservoir.


The solution therefore is to drill a borehole into the reservoir. However, the costs involved in drilling an exploration well tend to be in the region of $40M and since the success rate is generally about 1 in 10, this tends to be a very costly exercise.


It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a system for determining, with greater certainty, the nature of a subterranean reservoir without the need to sink a borehole.


It has been appreciated by the present applicants that while the seismic properties of oil-filled strata and water-filled strata do not differ significantly, their electromagnetic resistivities (permittivities) do differ. Thus, by using an electromagnetic surveying method, these differences can be exploited and the success rate in predicting the nature of a reservoir can be increased significantly. This represents potentially an enormous cost saving. These principles are discussed in International patent application PCT/GB01/00419 (U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/123,867), which applications are incorporated herein by reference. The method disclosed in the references referred to immediately above determines the nature of a subterranean reservoir whose approximate geometry and location are known, by applying a time varying electromagnetic field to the strata containing the reservoir; detecting the electromagnetic wave field response; seeking in the wave field response, a component representing a refracted wave from the hydrocarbon layer; and determining the content of the reservoir, based on the presence or absence of a wave component refracted by the hydrocarbon layer. The cited references also contemplate a method for searching for a hydrocarbon containing subterranean reservoir which comprises: applying a time varying electromagnetic field to subterranean strata; detecting the electromagnetic wave field response; seeking, in the wave field response, a component representing a refracted wave; and determining the presence and/or nature of any reservoir identified based on the presence or absence of a wave component refracted by hydrocarbon layer. The cited references also contemplate an apparatus for determining the nature of a subterranean reservoir whose approximate geometry and location are known, or for searching for a hydrocarbon-containing subterranean reservoir, the apparatus comprising: means for applying a time varying electromagnetic field to the strata containing the reservoir; means for detecting the electromagnetic wave field response; and means for seeking, in the wave field response, a component representing a refracted wave, thereby enabling the presence and/or nature of a reservoir to be determined.


Consequently, a method and apparatus embodying these principles form the basis of the present applicant's co-pending International patent application PCT/GB01/00419.


This contemplates a method of determining the nature of a subterranean reservoir whose approximate geometry and location are known, which comprises: applying a time varying electromagnetic field to the strata containing the reservoir; detecting the electromagnetic wave field response; seeking in the wave field response, a component representing a refracted wave from the hydrocarbon layer; and determining the content of the reservoir, based on the presence or absence of a wave component refracted by the hydrocarbon layer.


It also contemplates a method for searching for a hydrocarbon containing subterranean reservoir which includes: applying a time varying electromagnetic field to subterranean strata; detecting the electromagnetic wave field response; seeking, in the wave field response, a component representing a refracted wave; and determining the presence and/or nature of any reservoir identified based on the presence or absence of a wave component refracted by hydrocarbon layer.


It further contemplates an apparatus for determining the nature of a subterranean reservoir whose approximate geometry and location are known, or for searching for a hydrocarbon containing subterranean reservoir, the apparatus comprising: means for applying a time varying electromagnetic field to the strata containing the reservoir; means for detecting the electromagnetic wave field response; and means for seeking, in the wave field response, a component representing a refracted wave, thereby enabling the presence and/or nature of a reservoir to be determined.


A refracted wave behaves differently, depending on the nature of the stratum in which it is propagated. In particular, the propagation losses in hydrocarbon stratum are much lower than in a water-bearing stratum while the speed of propagation is much higher. Thus, when an oil-bearing reservoir is present, and an EM field is applied, a strong and rapidly propagated refracted wave can be detected. This may therefore indicate the presence of the reservoir or its nature if its presence is already known.


Electromagnetic surveying techniques in themselves are known. However, they are not widely used in practice. In general, the reservoirs of interest are about 1 km or more below the seabed. In order to carry out electromagnetic surveying as a stand alone technique in these conditions, with any reasonable degree of resolution, short wavelengths are necessary. Unfortunately, such short wavelengths suffer from very high attenuation. Long wavelengths do not provide adequate resolution. For these reasons, seismic techniques are preferred.


However, while longer wavelengths applied by electromagnetic techniques cannot provide sufficient information to provide an accurate indication of the boundaries of the various strata, if the geological structure is already known, they can be used to determine the nature of a particular identified formation, if the possibilities for the nature of that formation have significantly differing electromagnetic characteristics. The resolution is not particularly important and so longer wavelengths which do not suffer from excessive attenuation can be employed.


The resistivity of seawater is about 0.3 ohm-m and that of the overburden beneath the seabed would typically be from 0.3 to 4 ohm-m, for example about 2 ohm-m. However, the resistivity of an oil reservoir is likely to be about 20–300 ohm-m. This large difference can be exploited using the techniques of the present invention.


Typically, the resistivity of a hydrocarbon-bearing formation will be 20 to 300 times greater than water-bearing formation.


Due to the different electromagnetic properties of a gas/oil bearing formation and a water bearing formation, one can expect a reflection and refraction of the transmitted field at the boundary of a gas/oil bearing formation. However, the similarity between the properties of the overburden and a reservoir containing water means that no reflection or refraction is likely to occur.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An electric dipole transmitter antenna on or close to the sea floor induces electromagnetic (EM) fields and currents in the sea water and in the subsurface strata. In the sea water, the EM-fields are strongly attenuated due to the high conductivity in the saline environment, whereas the subsurface strata with less conductivity potentially can act as a guide for the EM-fields (less attenuation). If the frequency is low enough (in the order of 1 Hz), the EM-waves are able to penetrate deep into the subsurface, and deeply buried geological layers having higher electrical resistivity than the overburden (as e.g. a hydrocarbon filled reservoir) will affect the EM-waves. Depending on the angle of incidence and state of polarization, an EM wave incident upon a high resistive layer may excite a ducted (guided) wave mode in the layer. The ducted mode is propagated laterally along the layer and leaks energy back to the overburden and receivers positioned on the sea floor. The term “refracted” wave in this specification refers to this wave mode.


Both theory and laboratory experiments show that the ducted mode is excited only for an incident wave with transverse magnetic (TM) polarization (magnetic field perpendicular to the plane of incidence) and at angles of incidence close to the Brewster angle and the critical angle (the angle of total reflection). For transverse electric (TE) polarization (electric field perpendicular to the plane of incidence) the ducted mode will not be excited. Since the induced current is proportional to the electric field, the current will be parallel to the layer interfaces for TE polarization but, for TM polarization, there is an appreciable current across the layer interfaces.


A horizontal dipole source on the sea floor will generate both TE and TM waves, but by varying the orientation of the receiver antennae, it is possible to vary the sensitivity to the two modes of polarization. It appears that an in-line orientation (source and receiver dipoles in-line) is more sensitive to the TM mode of polarization, whereas a parallel orientation (source and receiver dipoles in parallel) is more sensitive to the TE mode of polarization. The TM mode is influenced by the presence of buried high resistive layers, whereas the TE mode is not. By measuring with the two antenna configurations and exploiting the difference between the two sets of measurements, it is possible to identify deeply buried high resistivity zones, i.e. a hydrocarbon reservoir.


The present invention has arisen from this realization.


According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for determining the nature of a subterranean reservoir which comprises and electromagnetic transmitter, and electromagnetic receiver, and means for comparing data received by the receiver when placed both in line and parallel relationship with the receiver. Another aspect of the invention is a method for a provisioning a vessel, a process for producing hydrocarbon, and a computer-readable storage medium for storing information generated by an electromagnetic transmitter and electromagnetic receiver placed both in line and parallel with the transmitter. In various aspects of the invention, an electric dipole transmitter antenna is positioned with its axis generally horizontal, an electric dipole receiver antenna in positioned in-line with the transmitter, an electromagnetic (EM) field is applied to the strata containing the reservoir using the transmitter, the EM wave field response is detected using the receiver and a component representing a refracted wave from the reservoir according to a first mode is identified in the response. An electric dipole receiver antenna parallel to the transmitter is also deployed, an EM field is applied to the strata using the transmitter, the EM wave field response is detected using the receiver and a component representing a refracted wave from the reservoir according to a second mode is identified in the response. The first mode refractive wave response is compared with the second mode refracted wave response in order to determine the nature of the reservoir.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a vertical cross-section through a testing tank;



FIG. 2 is a plan view of the tank of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a plan view of the antennae used in the tank of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is a side view of the antenna in FIG. 3;



FIGS. 5 and 6 are respectively a schematic plan view and side view of the testing tank set up for measurement;



FIGS. 7 is a graph showing calculated and measured values for the transmitted electric field for a given frequency in the model experiment;



FIG. 8 is a graph showing calculated values for the electric field in a realistic earth model;



FIG. 9 is a schematic side view of a cable layout towed by a vessel;



FIG. 10 is a plan view corresponding to FIG. 9; and



FIGS. 11 and 12 are views similar to FIG. 10 showing two alternative arrangements.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

According to an aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of searching for a hydrocarbon-containing subterranean reservoir which comprises: deploying an electric dipole transmitter antenna with its axis generally horizontal; deploying an electric dipole receiver antenna in-line with the transmitter; applying an EM field to subterranean strata using the transmitter; detecting the EM wave field response using the receiver; seeking in the response a component representing a refracted wave according to a first mode, caused by a high-resistivity zone; deploying an electric dipole receiver antenna parallel to the transmitter; applying an EM field to the strata using the transmitter; detecting the EM wave field response using the receiver; seeking in the response a component representing a refracted wave according to a second mode; and comparing the first mode refractive wave response with the second mode refractive wave response in order to determine the presence and/or nature of any high-resistivity zone.


The first mode may be considered to be a TM mode, and the second mode a TE mode.


Thus, according to the invention, measurements are taken with the transmitter and receiver both in-line and parallel, and the two sets of measurements are compared. A characteristic difference in values indicates a highly resistive layer located beneath highly conductive strata. High resistivity indicates the presence of hydrocarbons and so the difference in values is a direct hydrocarbon indicator.


This technique can be used in conjunction with conventional seismic techniques to identify hydrocarbon reservoirs.


Preferably, the transmitter and/or receiver comprises an array of dipole antennae.


The technique is applicable in exploring land-based subterranean reservoirs but is especially applicable to submarine, in particular sub-sea, subterranean reservoirs. Preferably the field is applied using one or more transmitters located on the earth's surface, and the detection is carried out by one or more receivers located on the earth's surface. In a preferred application, the transmitter(s) and/or receivers are located on or close to the seabed or the bed of some other area of water.


In a preferred arrangement, the transmitter and receiver antennae are located on a common cable towed behind a vessel. This will result in a fixed offset or a series of fixed offsets where several receivers are employed. Preferably, the transmitter transmits both modes and may therefore comprise two dipoles arranged mutually at right angles. Preferably each receiver comprises two dipoles mutually at right angles. Preferably one transmitter dipole and one receiver dipole are arranged at right angles to the direction of the cable. Alternatively the transmitter and/or receivers may each comprise a single dipole antenna arranged obliquely, e.g. at 45° to the direction of the cable. With this arrangement the transmitted field is resolved.


Using this technique, it is possible to achieve comparable results from the two modes as the same signal and offset are used. It will not matter greatly if the transmitter drifts in frequency or amplitude. Furthermore, reservoirs can be detected in real time. Thus, if the results show a difference in the two modes, this will strongly indicate the presence of an H/C bearing reservoir and so a more detailed study can be made at once.


Such a system would generally use a single transmission source and several receivers, typically more than ten. The different offsets would be suitable for detecting reservoirs at different depths.


The receivers can be deployed on a single cable or on a series of parallel cables. There may also be several transmitters.


In practice, the vessel would normally stop and the cable allowed to sink prior to transmission. There would be a transmission at several different frequencies before moving to another location. The technique is particularly suitable for edge detection, and it is a simple matter to select a suitable resolution. However, if the surveying is being carried out in an undetermined area, the resistivity in the top layers should be mapped, for example with MT methods or by inversion after a reflection study.


If the offset between the transmitter and receiver is significantly greater than three times the depth of the reservoir from the seabed (i.e. the thickness of the overburden), it will be appreciated that the attenuation of the refracted wave will often be less than that of direct wave and the reflected wave. The reason for this is the fact that the path of the refracted wave will be effectively distance from the transmitter down to the reservoir i.e. the thickness of the overburden, plus the offset along the reservoir, plus the distance from the reservoir up to the receivers i.e. once again the thickness of the overburden.


The polarization of the source transmission will determine how much energy is transmitted into the oil-bearing layer in the direction of the receiver. A dipole antenna is therefore the selected transmitter. In general, it is preferable to adopt a dipole with a large effective length. The transmitter dipole may therefore be 100 to 1000 meters in length and may be towed in two orthogonal directions. The receiver dipole optimum length is determined by the thickness of the overburden.


The transmitted field may be pulsed, however, a coherent continuous wave with stepped frequencies is preferred. It may be transmitted for a significant period of time, during which the transmitter should preferably be stationary (although it could be moving slowly), and the transmission stable. Thus, the field may be transmitted for a period of time from 3 seconds to 60 minutes, preferably from 3 to 30 minutes, for example about 20 minutes. The receivers may also be arranged to detect a direct wave and a wave refracted from the reservoir, and the analysis may include extracting phase and amplitude data of the refracted wave from corresponding data from the direct wave. The term “dataset”, as used herein, refers to a group of related records that are organized and treated as a unit.


Preferably, the wavelength of the transmission should be in the range

0.1s≦λ≦5s;

where λ is the wavelength of the transmission through the overburden and s is the distance from the seabed to the reservoir. More preferably λ is from about 0.5s to 2s. The transmission frequency may be from 0.01 Hz to 1 kHz, preferably from 1 to 20 Hz, for example 5 Hz.


Preferably, the distance between the transmitter and a receiver should be in the range

0.5λ≦L≦10λ

where λ is the wavelength of the transmission through the overburden and L is the distance between the transmitter and the first receiver.


It will be appreciated that the present invention may be used to determine the position, the extent, the nature and the volume of a particular stratum, and may also be used to detect changes in these parameters over a period of time.


The present invention also extends to a method of surveying subterranean measures which comprises; performing a seismic survey to determine the geological structure of a region; and where that survey reveals the presence of a subterranean reservoir, subsequently performing a method as described above.


Referring to the drawings, the tank 11 shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 comprises a concrete enclosure 9 m long, 6 m wide and 8 m in depth. The tank 11 is filled with sea water 12. A diaphragm 13 filled with fresh water 14 is located in the tank. The diaphragm 13 is 7.5 m long, 4.25 m wide and 0.25 m thick and can be located at any desired height in a horizontal orientation within the tank 11.


The conductivity of the sea water 12 was measured to be 5.3 S/m at 14° C. and the conductivity of the fresh water was measured to be 0.013 S/m. The ratio of the two conductivities is therefore very close to 400.


The critical frequency fc of a conducting medium, i.e. the frequency at which the displacement current is equal to the conduction current, is given by







f
c

=


σ

2


πɛ
r



ɛ
o






18
·

σ

ɛ
r








GHz







where ∈r is the relative dielectric constant of the medium, and σ the conductivity in S/m. For water, ∈r=80 at the frequencies and temperatures of interest. For the two conductivity values σ=5.2 S/m and σ=0.013 S/m, fc=1.2 GHz and 3 Mhz, respectively. Since, in the experiments, the highest frequency is 0.83 MHz, it is a fair approximation to neglect the displacement current, even for the fresh water.


For a non magnetic, conductive medium, the propagation constant γ is given by









γ
=






ɛμ








=








(



ɛ
r



ɛ
o


+

σ



)







μ
o
















jωμ
o


σ








=



2

π





j
·
f






σ

5










The wavelength λ, defined as the distance in which the phase changes 2π, is given by






λ
=



2

π


Re






{
γ
}






10

f





σ








λ m, f in MHz and σ in S/m. The skin depth, the distance in which the amplitude diminishes by 1/e, is related to the wavelength by






δ
=


λ

2

π


=


π

2

f






μ
o


σ








For the extremes of the frequency range, for the sea water with σ=5.2 S/m,





















Frequency
30
kHz
830
kHz



Skin depth
1.27
m
0.24
m



Wavelength
8.01
m
1.52
m











and for the fresh water with σ=0.013 S/m,





















Frequency
30
kHz
830
kHz



Skin depth
25.4
m
4.8
m



Wavelength
160.2
m
30.4
m










Referring now to FIGS. 3 and 4, two identical electrical dipole antennae, as shown were used for the transmitter and receiver.


Each antenna 15 comprises two square brass plates 16, 15 cm square, mounted on an epoxy substrate 17. Each plate 16 is connected to a co-axial cable 18, which passes through an epoxy tube 19 mounted at right angles to the plate 16, to a balun which transforms the impedance of the antenna 15 from about 2Ω in sea water to about 50Ω.


The measurement set-up is shown in FIGS. 5 and 6. An automatic network analyzer (ANA) measures the transmission between the antennae 15 as a function of distance (offset) and frequency. The arrangement shown in FIG. 5 shows the antennae 15 in the parallel orientation. The in-line orientation is achieved by rotating both antennae through 90° in the horizontal plane.


The results of the measurements are shown in FIG. 7 together with the corresponding theoretical results. The measurements agree well with the theoretical results and the figure contains two sets of curves, one with parallel antennae and one with the antennae in line. The theoretical results are computed for infinitesimal dipole antennae. The orientations of the antennae and the frequency are shown on the Figures.


The parameters of the experiment are scaled relative to possible practical situations. To give an idea of orders of magnitude; if the frequency is scaled down by a factor of 40,000 and the conductivity by a factor of 10, the dimensions will be scaled up by a factor of 632, and the experimental setup would correspond to a low conductivity layer of thickness 150 m and conductivity 0.0013 S/m below an overburden of thickness 300 m and conductivity 0.52 S/m. The corresponding frequency range would be from 0.75 Hz to 20 Hz, and the length of the antenna nearly 300 m.


The method with the TE and TM-mode have been tested by computer simulations on a simple horizontally layered earth model with electrical parameter values for typical deep water subsurface sediments. The model has an infinite insulating air layer, a 1150 meter water layer of 0.3125 Ωm, 950 meter overburden of 1 Ωm, a 150 meter reservoir zone of 50 Ωm and an infinite underburden of 1 Ωm. FIG. 8 illustrates the amplitude response |E| (electric field) as a function of receiver offset, caused by a 1 Hz signal. Responses from both the TM-mode (solid with ×'s) and TE-mode (dashed with +'s) are shown. The amplitudes for the TM-mode are approximately 10 times larger at an offset of 5 km. As a reference, the response from a homogenous half-space of 1 Ωm is shown for both configurations (corresponding to a response from a water filler reservoir or outside the reservoir area). The TE-mode has the largest deviation from its half-space, i.e. this mode is more sensitive to a hydrocarbon layer.



FIGS. 9 and 10 show a vessel 31 towing a cable (or streamer) 32 just above the seabed 33. The cable 32 carries a transmitter dipole antenna 34 and several receiver dipoles 35, only four of which are shown. The depth of water might be of the order of 1000 m, the offset between the transmitter 34 and the nearest receiver 35 might be about 2000 m and the receivers might be about 100 m apart. The transmitter 34 is controlled from the vessel 31 via the cable 32 and the responses detected by the receivers 35 are relayed back to the vessel 31 in real time, again via the cable 32.



FIG. 11 shows an arrangement in which the vessel 31 tows three cables 41, 42, 43, each carrying a series of receivers 45, 46, 47. The spacing of the three cables 41, 42, 43 is achieved by means of a spar 44.


In the arrangement shown in FIG. 11, the transmitter 48 is in the form of two dipole antennae, one parallel to the cable 42 and one at right angles.


The arrangement shown in FIG. 12 is similar to FIG. 11, but in this case, the transmitter 51 is a single dipole antenna arranged at 45° to the cable 42.

Claims
  • 1. Hydrocarbons produced by a process of: identifying a subterranean reservoir;deploying an electric dipole transmitter antenna;deploying an electric dipole receiver antenna positioned in-line with the transmitter;applying an electromagnetic (EM) field to the strata containing the reservoir using the transmitter;detecting the EM wave field response using the receiver antenna in-line with the transmitter and identifying in the response a component representing a refracted wave from the reservoir according to a first mode;deploying an electric dipole receiver antenna positioned parallel to the transmitter;applying an EM field to the strata using the transmitter;detecting the EM wave field response using the receiver antenna positioned parallel to the transmitter and identifying in the response a component representing a refracted wave from the reservoir according to a second mode;comparing the first mode refractive wave response with the second mode refracted wave response in order to determine the nature of the reservoir;accessing the reservoir by drilling; andextracting hydrocarbons from the reservoir.
  • 2. A computer-readable storage medium storing information produced by a process of: deploying an electric dipole transmitter antenna above undersea strata containing a suspected reservoir;deploying an electric dipole receiver antenna positioned in-line with the transmitter;applying an electromagnetic (EM) field to the strata containing the reservoir using the transmitter;detecting the EM wave field response using the receiver antenna positioned in-line with the transmitter and identifying in the response a component representing a refracted wave from the reservoir according to a first mode;deploying an electric dipole receiver antenna positioned parallel to the transmitter;applying an EM field to the strata using the transmitter;detecting the EM wave field response using the receiver antenna positioned parallel to the transmitter and identifying in the response a component representing a refracted wave from the reservoir according to a second mode; andcomparing the refracted wave from the reservoir according to a first mode with the refracted wave from the reservoir according to a second mode.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
0019956.2 Aug 2000 GB national
0023921.1 Sep 2000 GB national
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/344,585 filed Aug. 21, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,038,456, which claims priority to PCT Application No. PCT/GB01/03473 filed Aug. 2, 2001, which claims priority to Great Britain Application No. 0019956.2 filed Aug. 14, 2000, and claims priority to Great Britain Application No. 0023921.1 filed Sep. 29, 2000. The entire disclosure of the prior application is considered as being part of the disclosure of the accompanying application and is hereby incorporated by reference therein.

US Referenced Citations (56)
Number Name Date Kind
2531088 Thompson Nov 1950 A
3052836 Postma Sep 1962 A
3398356 Still Aug 1968 A
3548299 Duroux et al. Dec 1970 A
3806795 Morey Apr 1974 A
4010413 Daniel Mar 1977 A
4079309 Seeley Mar 1978 A
4258322 Rocroi et al. Mar 1981 A
4308499 Thierbach et al. Dec 1981 A
4417210 Rocroi et al. Nov 1983 A
4446434 Sternberg et al. May 1984 A
4451789 Meador May 1984 A
4489276 Yu Dec 1984 A
4506225 Loveless et al. Mar 1985 A
4547733 Thoraval Oct 1985 A
4594551 Cox et al. Jun 1986 A
4616184 Lee et al. Oct 1986 A
4633182 Dzwinel Dec 1986 A
4652829 Safinya Mar 1987 A
4760340 Denzau et al. Jul 1988 A
4835474 Parra et al. May 1989 A
5025218 Ramstedt Jun 1991 A
5066916 Rau Nov 1991 A
5177445 Cross Jan 1993 A
5192952 Johler Mar 1993 A
5280284 Johler Jan 1994 A
5373443 Lee et al. Dec 1994 A
5400030 Duren et al. Mar 1995 A
H1490 Thompson et al. Sep 1995 H
5486764 Thompson et al. Jan 1996 A
H1524 Thompson et al. Apr 1996 H
H1561 Thompson Jul 1996 H
5563513 Tasei et al. Oct 1996 A
5689068 Locatelli et al. Nov 1997 A
5767679 Schroder Jun 1998 A
5811973 Meyer, Jr. Sep 1998 A
5841280 Yu et al. Nov 1998 A
5877995 Thompson et al. Mar 1999 A
5886526 Wu Mar 1999 A
5892361 Meyer, Jr. et al. Apr 1999 A
5955884 Payton et al. Sep 1999 A
6002357 Redfern et al. Dec 1999 A
6023168 Minerbo Feb 2000 A
6060885 Tabarovsky et al. May 2000 A
6157195 Vail, III Dec 2000 A
6163155 Bittar Dec 2000 A
6184685 Paulk et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188221 Van de Kop et al. Feb 2001 B1
6188222 Seydoux et al. Feb 2001 B1
6225806 Millar et al. May 2001 B1
6246240 Vail, III Jun 2001 B1
6339333 Kuo Jan 2002 B1
6480000 Kong Nov 2002 B1
7038456 Ellingsrud et al. May 2006 B2
20030048105 Ellingsrud et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030052685 Ellingsrud et al. Mar 2003 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (16)
Number Date Country
0087271 Aug 1983 EP
0219234 Apr 1987 EP
0512756 Nov 1991 EP
0814349 Dec 1997 EP
2479992 Oct 1981 FR
2155182 Sep 1985 GB
2256715 Dec 1992 GB
2301902 Dec 1996 GB
WO 8101617 Jun 1981 WO
WO 9606367 Feb 1996 WO
WO 9828638 Jul 1998 WO
WO 0000850 Jan 2000 WO
WO 0013037 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0013046 Mar 2000 WO
WO 0063718 Oct 2000 WO
WO0155749 Aug 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060091889 A1 May 2006 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10344585 US
Child 11301010 US