Patent Grant
9889520
This application is the National Stage of PCT/AT2010/000164 filed on May 12, 2010, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of Austrian Application No. A 747/2009 filed on May 14, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. The international application under PCT article 21(2) was not published in English.
The invention relates to a method for determining the temporal curve of the voltage at the electrodes of a spot welding gun during a spot welding process as an indicator of the welding quality, wherein the electrodes are fastened to gun arms, that can be moved relative to each other, wherein a measuring voltage is measured via measuring leads and an induced compensating voltage is measured by means of a compensating coil.
The invention also relates to an apparatus for determining the temporal curve of the voltage at the electrodes of a spot welding gun during a spot welding process as an indicator of the welding quality, wherein the electrodes are fastened to gun arms, that can be moved relative to each other, comprising a device for measuring a measuring voltage between the electrodes, said measuring device being connected to measuring leads extending along the gun arms, and further comprising a compensating coil for measuring a compensating voltage for compensating measuring errors in the measuring leads.
In resistance welding processes using spot welding guns at least two components to be welded are contacted, and by impressing a welding current via the electrodes of the spot welding gun the components are melted on and thereby a weld joint is created. For quality control purposes, but also for controlling the welding current course, a continued detection of the welding current and the electrode voltage during the spot welding process is required.
Usually, the quality-related electrode voltage, resulting from the temporally changing ohmic resistance R(t) of the components and the welding current i(t), is significantly determined via measuring leads running in parallel to feed and return lines for the welding current. By such a measuring arrangement an induction loop is formed by the feed lines and the measuring leads, in which voltages are induced by magnetic fields existing during the spot welding process, falsifying the measuring result. Often, the changes in the magnetic field are so large that the induced voltage is even larger than the electrode voltage to be measured.
In order to suppress the induction portions in the measuring signal often analog and digital filters are used. It is disadvantageous that not only the induction portion is suppressed, but also the temporal curve of the electrode voltage R(t)*i(t) is falsified.
In order to compensate the induced voltages, compensating coils are employed, thereby reducing or eliminating impacts of magnetic fields. For example, in the spot welding machine according to DE 31 29 170 A1 a compensating coil is interconnected with the coil formed of the measuring leads and the welding current feed lines such that errors due to the induced voltages can be compensated approximately. It is disadvantageous that the changes of the magnetic flux can not be corrected. Such changes within the magnetic field are caused e.g. by moving the gun relative to the component from welding spot to welding spot or are created during the welding process by saturation occurrences of component materials located in the magnetic field of the gun. Thus, these changes occur virtually always so that said errors are irregular.
Furthermore, in measuring processes, the voltage measuring leads whereof are not contacted in the range of the electrodes, measured voltages are affected by temperatures existing at the gun arms and the feed and return lines for the welding current. This is because the temperature affects the resistance of the feed line and, thus, the voltage drop so that the measuring result is falsified.
The object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus mentioned above, by the help of which the temporal curve of the voltage at the electrodes of the spot welding gun during a spot welding process can be determined as precisely as possible. Prior art disadvantages are to be avoided or at least be reduced.
In procedural terms, the object of the invention is solved in that the measuring voltage and the compensating voltage are detected separately and that the relation between the measuring voltage and the compensating voltage is determined. In contrast to prior art the present method allows for a separate processing of the measuring voltage and the compensating voltage, whereby induced voltages can be compensated independently of the changing magnetic flux, and the electrode voltage can be determined precisely. In turn, the precisely determined electrode voltage allows for the welding quality to be concluded in an improved way. The present method is characterized in that during the entire spot welding process the measuring voltage and the compensating voltage can be determined and thereby a continuous correction of measuring errors caused by induced voltages becomes possible.
According to another feature of the invention it is intended that the relation between measuring voltage and compensating voltage during the spot welding process is determined continuously so that a precise measurement is provided.
According to an advantageous variation of the method said relation between measuring voltage and compensating voltage is determined at times, when erratic changes in voltage occur. Since at those times, when quick voltage changes occur within the compensating coil also quick voltage changes must occur within the measuring voltage signal, the magnitude of induced voltage can, thus, be particularly well concluded by comparing the measuring voltage and the compensating voltage.
According to a further feature of the invention it is intended that the compensating voltage is multiplied by the determined relation and subtracted from the measuring voltage for determining the electrode voltage. Thus, the electrode voltage can be determined very precisely without falsification caused by filtering and changing magnetic fluxes during the welding and from welding spot to welding spot due to the elimination of induced voltages.
In addition, the voltage drop at the resistance of feed lines can be subtracted from the measuring voltage adjusted by the induced voltages for determining the electrode voltage. This way, further influencing factors can be eliminated and the electrode voltage can be determined more precise.
The voltage drop at the resistance of feed lines can be determined by the help of the ohmic resistance of feed lines during a spot welding process without using the components to be welded. Thus, a spot welding process without components to be welded is performed prior to the actual spot welding process, and the measuring voltage adjusted by the induced voltage is divided by the measured welding current, thereby the ohmic resistance of feed lines is determined. Thus, an accurate correction of the feed line resistance at the gun body, which changes depending on temperature, can be performed.
Advantageously, the measuring voltage and the compensating voltage are digitalized and delivered to a processing unit, particularly a microprocessor.
Advantageously, a part of the area defined by the measuring leads for measuring the measuring voltage is covered by the compensating coil for measuring the compensating voltage. The compensating coil is advantageously arranged such that the accessibility to the components to be welded is preferably not impaired. This way it is also ensured that the induced voltages within the measuring lead and within the compensating coil do not differ from each other in their form due to external magnetic fields, such as by welding currents of adjacent welding guns, during the spot welding process, and, thus, a compensation of the induction portion within the measuring voltage can take place.
In particular, for quality control purposes it is of advantage when the determined measuring voltage and compensating voltage and/or magnitudes derived therefrom are stored.
The object of the invention is also solved by an apparatus for determining the temporal curve of the voltage at the electrodes of a spot welding gun mentioned above, wherein the device for measuring the measuring voltage and the device for measuring the compensating voltage are designed as separate units for separate detection and connected to a device for processing the detected values. As already mentioned above, by separate detection and processing of measuring voltage and compensating voltage the electrode voltage can be determined preferably precise without falsifying the temporal curve by means of filtering in a changing magnetic flux due to the accurate compensation of the induced voltage within the measuring voltage continuously updated. Another advantage is that the processing device and the measuring devices are accommodated within a measuring apparatus mounted close to the welding gun, e.g. at the gun body. Thus, interferences can be minimized. Advantageously, the measuring data is edited in the processing unit and made available to other system parts via a bus system.
As an advantage, the compensating coil covers a part of the area defined by the measuring leads, without, however, significantly impairing the accessibility of the components to be welded.
If the presence of temporarily changing external magnetic fields can be excluded, it is also possible to use a Rogowski coil as compensating coil. A Rogowski coil is an air-core coil without a ferrite core, which is arranged around a gun component conducting the welding current, whereby non-linear impacts of a ferrite core will no longer occur. Advantageously, the Rogowski coil can simultaneously be used for the determination of the welding current and for the determination of the induction voltage for compensation, whereby system costs can be lowered.
According to another feature of the invention it is provided that the processing device is designed for detecting the measuring voltage and the compensating voltage and for determining a relation between the measuring voltage and the compensating voltage, and that the relation can be determined from the values detected at those times, when erratic voltage changes occur. Said relation is determined from values detected at those times, when erratic changes occur. Thus, in comparing the measuring voltage and the compensating voltage at those times, when erratic voltage changes occur, the portion of the induced voltages in the measuring voltage during the entire welding period can be eliminated.
Advantageously, the processing device is designed for multiplication of the compensating voltage by the relation determined and for subtraction of the compensating voltage multiplied by relation from the measuring voltage, in order to determine the electrode voltage.
Also, a memory for storing the detected measuring voltage, the compensating voltage and/or magnitudes derived therefrom can be provided.
Finally, according to an advantageous variation of the apparatus the measuring leads are significantly fastened in front of the electrodes, whereby the voltage drop occurring at the electrodes is independent from variations in temperature. Usually, the electrodes are water-cooled, whereby the temperature of said cooled part of the feed line changes merely noticeable and, thus, in operation the predefined feed line resistance can be taken into account properly. Moreover, the electrode change, continuously taking place during operation, is thereby not impaired.
The present invention is explained in more detail with the help of the attached drawings. In which:
By means of the temporal curves of welding current i(t), measuring voltage um(t) and compensating voltage uk(t) at a medium frequency direct current station shown in
Measuring voltage um(t) consists of the induced voltage ui(t) and electrode voltage ue(t). The induced voltage ui(t) is affected by component 13 to be welded, since component 13 is moved into the coil formed of measuring leads 6 and changes the magnetic flux of the coil. It is to be noted that the position of component 13 is changed with every welding spot as indicated by the arrow in
In contrast to measuring voltage um(t) the voltage curve uk(t) at compensating coil 7 is proportional to the discharge of welding current i(t), since component 13 has no impact on the magnetic flux within compensating coil 7. Erratic changes in the curve of compensating voltage uk(t) and measuring voltage um(t) relate to the breaks of slope in the curve of welding current i(t).
By comparing the measuring voltage um(t) and the compensating voltage uk(t) in the range of erratic voltage changes, for example at time point ti, the measuring device 8 can determine a relation v(t) based on the step sizes of the voltage changes. Said relation v(t) is necessary to balance the irregular areas of measuring coil and compensating coil 7 and to conclude from compensating voltage uk(t) to induced voltage ui(t). If the compensating voltage uk(t) is multiplied by said determined relation v(t) and subtracted from measuring voltage um(t), then significantly, the electrode voltage ue(t) is precisely obtained. Thus, the induced voltage ui(t) is eliminated from the measuring voltage um(t). Additionally, a voltage drop uL(t) is still to be subtracted from said electrode voltage ue(t) due to the resistance of feed lines 4. This is necessary since the measuring leads 6 can not be guided to those positions of the electrodes 3 that produce the welding spot. Accordingly, the electrodes 3 need to be changed regularly. For this reason, measuring leads 6 were significantly fastened to the so-called electrode socket 15, each receiving one electrode 3. That means that in this case the voltage drop uL(t) at electrodes 3—being a resistance and also feed line 4—is also measured. In order to subtract said voltage drop uL(t), it is necessary to determine the value of the ohmic resistance during a spot welding process, without, however, the components to be welded. For that purpose, a spot welding process is significantly performed, wherein electrodes 3 contact each other, since no components are present. Thus, the voltage drop uL(t) is obtained by subtracting the compensating voltage uk(t) from the measured voltage um(t). Said voltage drop uL(t) does not change any further significantly, since the measuring leads 6 are fastened to electrode sockets 15—that is in front of the water-cooled electrodes 3. The temperature of the electrodes 3 is thereby remained substantially stable so there is no impact on the voltage drop uL(t). Thus, the minor voltage drop uL(t) that is finally still contained within electrode voltage ue(t) can be subtracted and electrode voltage ue(t) is determined precisely. Thereby, the welding spot quality can be evaluated very precisely on the basis of electrode voltage ue(t).
In order to determine electrode voltage ue(t) continuously, it is necessary to update or redetermine the relation v(t) with every erratic voltage change. For example, erratic voltage changes take place at a frequency in the range of up to 10 kHz, for example 2 kHz. Between erratic voltage changes the electrode voltage ue(t) is determined by means of the relation v(t) determined at the last erratic change. According to this, significantly an approximation of electrode voltage ue(t) takes place between the erratic voltage changes. Thus, a permanent elimination of the voltages ui(t) induced within measuring voltage um(t) is ensured. The present method is not impaired by external magnetic fields from the surroundings of a spot welding gun 1, since both measuring voltage um(t) and compensating voltage uk(t) are changed similarly.
Finally,
Accordingly, while at least one embodiment has been shown and described, the embodiments are shown as examples only and the following claims are not to be limited to the embodiments disclosed herein.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| A 747/2009 | May 2009 | AT | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/AT2010/000164 | 5/12/2010 | WO | 00 | 11/10/2011 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2010/129982 | 11/18/2010 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2370009 | Clark et al. | Feb 1945 | A |
| 2486552 | Callender | Nov 1949 | A |
| 2508330 | Callender et al. | May 1950 | A |
| 3068350 | Archer | Dec 1962 | A |
| 3389239 | Treppa et al. | Jun 1968 | A |
| 3445768 | Ferguson | May 1969 | A |
| 3582967 | Beckman et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3586815 | Van Eijnsbergen et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
| 3609285 | Scarpelli et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3746829 | Petzold | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3921453 | Platzer, Jr. | Nov 1975 | A |
| 4242561 | Long | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4302653 | Denning et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4334779 | Domey et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
| 4376884 | Gold et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4403132 | Sugimoto | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4434351 | Nakata et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4447698 | Van Sikle et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4447700 | Cohen | May 1984 | A |
| 4449028 | Buxton | May 1984 | A |
| 4456810 | Schumacher et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4459457 | Jurek | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4562330 | Hamilton | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4621176 | Kliesch et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4714816 | Pazzaglia | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4734556 | Namiki | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4734640 | Kitahori et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4745255 | Mettier | May 1988 | A |
| 4887025 | Re Fiorentin et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
| 4939335 | Mueller | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4963830 | Roth et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 5015815 | Matuschek et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5043557 | Tabata et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5081338 | Dufrenne | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5171961 | Corton et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5291423 | Roosli | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5313041 | Levy et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5343011 | Fujii et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5386096 | Buda et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5436422 | Nishiwaki et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5449877 | Buda et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5575934 | Takakuwa et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5764859 | Kim et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5786558 | Shimada | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5793011 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5852273 | Ryudo et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5892197 | Goto et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5925264 | Mouannes | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5942139 | Moriguchi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5963022 | Buda et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6013892 | Buda et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6043449 | Kanjo | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6057523 | Fujii et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6087613 | Buda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6130396 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6140825 | Fujii et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6329626 | Fujita et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6335504 | Ling et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6359258 | Blankenship et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| RE37799 | Watanabe et al. | Jul 2002 | E |
| 6479784 | Tagliavini | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6506997 | Matsuyama | Jan 2003 | B2 |
| 6520026 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6710297 | Artelsmair et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6747235 | Muller et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6766283 | Goldman et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 7015419 | Hackl et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7173209 | Muller et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7244905 | Das et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7335854 | Hutchison | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7432466 | Spinella et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7640125 | D'Angelo et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7683290 | Daniel et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7718918 | Spinella et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
| 7728254 | D'Angelo et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7759596 | Filev et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 8256296 | Ume et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 20020053555 | Matsuyama | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20050218120 | Shih | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 31 29 170 | Mar 1982 | DE |
| 0 345 473 | Dec 1989 | EP |
| 2008-142773 | Jun 2008 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report of PCT/AT2010/000164, dated Sep. 1, 2010. |
| Austrian Patent Office Preliminary Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2010 in Austrian Application No. A 747/2009 (with English translation of relevant parts). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120048834 A1 | Mar 2012 | US |
