Method and apparatus for differentiating touch screen users based on touch event analysis

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10599251
  • Patent Number
    10,599,251
  • Date Filed
    Monday, March 21, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 24, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
Some embodiments of the present invention include a method of differentiating touch screen users based on characterization of features derived from the touch event acoustics and mechanical impact and includes detecting a touch event on a touch sensitive surface, generating a vibro-acoustic waveform signal using at least one sensor detecting such touch event, converting the waveform signal into at least a domain signal, extracting distinguishing features from said domain signal, and classifying said features to associate the features of the domain signal with a particular user.
Description
COPYRIGHT NOTICE

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.


TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates generally to the field of touch screen technology and more particularly to the analysis of touch screen mechanical impact features and acoustic features to differentiate between different users.


BACKGROUND

The subject matter discussed in the background section should not be assumed to be prior art merely as a result of its mention in the background section. Similarly, a problem mentioned in the background section or associated with the subject matter of the background section should not be assumed to have been previously recognized in the prior art. The subject matter in the background section merely represents different approaches, which in and of themselves may also be inventions.


The following detailed description is made with reference to the technology disclosed. Preferred implementations are described to illustrate the technology disclosed, not to limit its scope, which is defined by the claims. Those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize a variety of equivalent variations on the description.


Various electronic devices today are typically operated by a user interacting with a touch screen. Some such devices, such as touch sensitive computer screens, are designed to be operated by multiple users, normally at different times. Other such devices, such as smart phones, are usually associated with a single user whose privacy could be seriously jeopardized if another user gains unauthorized access to such one-user devices.


With multiple user devices, it is usually necessary to provide an input to the computer to identify the particular user who is operating the system so that appropriate user-related programs are presented for further processing by the correct user.


With single user devices, exposure of detailed information to an unauthorized user would exacerbate the injury to privacy of the authorized user and therefore passwords, fingerprint readers and entry codes are often used to prevent access to the unauthorized user.


Unfortunately, such user ID inputs, passwords, fingerprint reading, entry codes and other such extra ID or security operations, are time-consuming and inconvenient and detract from the pleasure and efficiencies of using such devices.


BRIEF SUMMARY

For some embodiments, methods for differentiating touch screen users includes detecting a touch event from at least one user, generating a vibro-acoustic waveform signal associated with the touch event, converting the vibro-acoustic waveform signal into at least one converted waveform signal different from the vibro-acoustic wave form signal, extracting distinguishing features from the converted waveform signal, and using the extracted distinguishing features to associate the touch event with a particular user.


For some embodiments, apparatus for differentiating touch screen users include a touch sensitive surface configured for detecting a touch event from at least one user, a sensor configured to generate a vibro-acoustic waveform signal in response to occurrence of the touch event, a converter configured to convert the waveform signal into at least one converted wave form signal different from the vibro-acoustic waveform signal, a feature extractor configured for extracting distinguishing features from the converted waveform signal, and a classification unit configured to use the distinguishing features extracted by the extractor to associate the vibro-acoustic waveform signal with a particular user.


Other aspects and advantages of the present invention can be seen on review of the drawings, the detailed description and the claims, which follow.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The included drawings are for illustrative purposes and serve only to provide examples of possible structures and process steps for the disclosed techniques. These drawings in no way limit any changes in form and detail that may be made to embodiments by one skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computing system for distinguishing touch screen users based on a classification of vibro-acoustic signals, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 2A is a graph of a waveform signal of a first user, showing a time domain signal generated by a touch screen event of the first user, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 2B is a converted waveform signal of the first user comprising the frequency spectrum of the waveform signal of FIG. 2A, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 3A is a graph of a waveform signal of a second user, showing a time domain signal generated by a touch screen event of the second user, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 3B is a converted waveform signal of the second user comprising the frequency spectrum of the waveform signal of FIG. 3A, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention; and



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a process that may be performed to differentiate touch screen users, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Applications of methods and apparatus according to one or more embodiments are described in this section. These examples are being provided solely to add context and aid in the understanding of the present disclosure. It will thus be apparent to one skilled in the art that the techniques described herein may be practiced without some or all of these specific details. In other instances, well known process steps have not been described in detail in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the present disclosure. Other applications are possible, such that the following examples should not be taken as definitive or limiting either in scope or setting.


In the following detailed description, references are made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the description and in which are shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments. Although these embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable one skilled in the art to practice the disclosure, it is understood that these examples are not limiting, such that other embodiments may be used and changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure.


One or more embodiments may be implemented in numerous ways, including as a process, an apparatus, a system, a device, a method, a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage medium containing computer readable instructions or computer program code, or as a computer program product comprising a computer usable medium having a computer readable program code embodied therein.


The disclosed embodiments may include methods of differentiating touch screen users based on characterization of features derived from the touch event acoustics and mechanical impact and includes detecting a touch event on a touch sensitive surface, generating a vibro-acoustic waveform signal using at least one sensor detecting such touch event, converting the waveform signal into at least a domain signal, extracting distinguishing features from said domain signal, and classifying said features to associate the features of the domain signal with a particular user.


The disclosed embodiments may include systems to differentiate touch screen users of a touch screen device. The systems may include a processor and one or more stored sequences of instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to detect a touch event on a touch sensitive surface, generate a vibro-acoustic waveform signal using at least one sensor detecting such touch event, convert the waveform signal into at least a domain signal, extract distinguishing features from said domain signal, and classify said features to associate the features of the domain signal with a particular user.


The disclosed embodiments may include apparatus to differentiate touch screen users of a touch screen device. The apparatus may include a touch sensitive surface for detecting a touch event from at least one user, at least one sensor generating a vibro-acoustic waveform signal from such touch event, a converter for converting the waveform signal into at least a domain signal, a feature extractor for extracting distinguishing features from said domain signal, and a classification unit which uses the distinguishing features of said extractor to associate the features of the domain signal with a particular user.


The disclosed embodiments may include a machine-readable medium carrying one or more sequences of instructions for providing social information, which instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to detect a touch event on a touch sensitive surface, generate a vibro-acoustic waveform signal using at least one sensor detecting such touch event, convert the waveform signal into at least a domain signal, extract distinguishing features from said domain signal, and classify said features to associate the features of the domain signal with a particular user. The domain signal may be a time domain signal or a frequency domain signal.


In general, when a user touches a touch screen (i.e., a physical impact) of a computing system equipped with a touch screen (e.g., a smart phone), a mechanical force is applied to the touch screen, resulting in mechanical vibrations that propagate on and through the touch screen, as well as any contacting components (e.g., device chassis, electronics main board, enclosure). These mechanical vibrations may be captured by at least one of a variety of sensors, including impact sensors, vibration sensors, accelerometers, strain gauges, or acoustic sensors such as a condenser microphone, a piezoelectric microphone, MEMS microphone and the like.


Once the vibro-acoustic signal associated with the mechanical vibrations has been captured by a sensor, it can be converted into a series of features, for example: Average acoustic power, Standard Deviation, Variance, Skewness, Kurtosis, Absolute sum, Root Mean Square (RMS), Dispersion, Zero-crossings, Spectral centroid, Spectral density, Linear Prediction-based Cepstral Coefficients (LPCC), Perceptual Linear Prediction (PLP), Cepstral Coefficients Cepstrum Coefficients, Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC), Frequency phases (e.g., as generated by an FFT).


Many touch screen technologies are able to digitize several aspects of a touch event, such as the shape, size, capacitance, orientation, pressure, etc. The latter may be used as distinguishing features, or such features can be derived from them. Further, because human fingers vary in their anatomical composition, their acoustic and touch properties can vary between humans. Moreover, the way users touch a touch screen can also be distinguishing (e.g., what finger, what part of the finger, how flat, how hard). Thus, the vibro-acoustic features and touch features contain properties that can be characteristic of different users.


It is therefore possible to include a classifier in a computing system configured with a touch screen that upon receipt of a touch event, makes a determination about which user is operating the computing system or whether the user is authorized or has any personalized features. Any single event may not yield sufficient confidence as to identifying which user is operating the device. Therefore the classifier may withhold a conclusion until a sufficient level of confidence is reached, or a best guess can be forced at a predetermined period or event (e.g., after 10 touches, after 2 minutes, when entering a privileged application).


For some embodiments, the classifier may include a sensing system configured to continuously samples vibro-acoustic data and saving it into a buffer. The buffer can be of many lengths such as, for example, 50 milliseconds. The classifier may be coupled with a touch screen (or touch sensitive surface) configured to wait for a touch event to occur. Any number of touch technologies are possible for the touch screen. When the touch screen detects a touch event, it triggers a conversion, feature extraction, and classification process.


When the touch event is detected, data from the vibro-acoustic buffer is retrieved. Because the touch screen may have some latency, it is often necessary to look backwards in the buffer to find the vibro-acoustic waveform that corresponds to the touch impact (e.g., if the touch screen has a 20 ms latency, it may be necessary to look back in the buffer 20 ms to find the corresponding vibro-acoustic event). All or part of the buffer may be saved and passed to the next process.


The waveform from the sensor is a time-domain representation of the vibro-acoustic signal. During conversion, the signal is converted into other forms. This includes filtering the waveform and transforming into other forms, including frequency domain representations. During extraction, touch screen controller data and vibro-acoustic data are analyzed, and features that characterize different users are extracted. For the vibro-acoustic data, features are computed for all representations of the signal. These features are then passed to the classifier, which uses the information to label the touch event with a user (in addition to whatever the touch sensitive surface reports, e.g., X/Y position, major/minor axes, pressure, etc.) The augmented touch event may then be passed to the operating system (OS) or end user applications, to associate a user based on the touch event.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computing system 10 for distinguishing among different users based on a classification of vibro-acoustic signals, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The computing system 10 of the embodiment may have an OS, and can run various types of services or applications, known as apps. The computing system 10 may also be equipped with a telecommunication capability that can allow connections to a communications network. Such a computing system may include, but not be limited to, a table top computer (e.g., Surface Computing), laptop computer, desktop computer, mobile computer, mobile internet device, mobile phone, smart-phone, PDA (Personal Digital Assistant), game console, portable media player, and the like.


Referring to FIG. 1, the computing system 10 may include a touch screen 100, a touch event detector 110, a vibro-acoustic classifier 120 and an OS 130. The touch event detector 110 may be associated with one or more sensors. The one or more sensors may be mounted at any number of locations inside the computing system 10, including but not limited to a chassis, touch screen, mainboard, PCB, display, panel and enclosure.


When a user uses a finger to touch a surface of the touch screen 100, the touch event produces a vibro-acoustic response in the air and also mechanical vibrations inside the contacting surface (e.g., touch screen, enclosure, device chassis). Some embodiments of the present invention may utilize both sources of vibro-acoustic signal with one or more sensors (e.g., one for in-air acoustics, and one for mechanical vibrations, also referred to as structural acoustics). Several sensor types can be used including, for example, Piezo bender elements, Piezo film, Accelerometers (e.g., linear variable differential transformer (LVDT), Potentiometric, Variable Reluctance, Piezoelectric, Piezoresistive, Capacitive, Servo (Force Balance), MEMS, Displacement sensors, Velocity sensors, Vibration sensors, Gyroscopes, Proximity Sensors, Electric mics, Hydrophones, Condenser microphone, Electret condenser microphone, Dynamic microphone, Ribbon microphone, Carbon microphone, Piezoelectric microphone, Fiber optic microphone, Laser microphone, Liquid microphone, MEMS microphone.


Many touch screen computing systems have microphones and accelerometers built in (e.g., for voice and input sensing). These can be utilized without the need for additional sensors, or can work in concert with specialized sensors.


The sensor may capture a waveform, which is a time-domain representation of the vibro-acoustic signal. The signal may be converted into other forms. This includes filtering the waveform (e.g., kalman filter, exponential moving average, 2 kHz high pass filter, one euro filter, savitzky-golay filter). It also includes transformation into other representations (e.g., wavelet transform, derivative), including frequency domain representations (e.g., spectral plot, periodogram, method of averaged periodograms, Fourier transform, least-squares spectral analysis, Welch's method, discrete cosine transform (DCT), fast folding algorithm).


The availability of the following touch features depends on the touch screen technology used. A classifier can use none, some or all of these features. These features may include location of touch contact (2D, or 3D in the case of curved glass or other non-planar geometry), size of touch contact (some touch technologies provide an ellipse of the touch contact with major and minor axes), rotation of the touch contact, surface area of the touch contact (e.g., in squared mm or pixels), pressure of touch (available on some touch systems), shear of touch (“shear stress (also called “tangential force” in the literature) arises from a force vector perpendicular to the surface normal of a touch screen. This may be similar to normal stress—what is commonly called pressure—which arises from a force vector parallel to the surface normal”), number of touch contacts, capacitance of touch (if using a capacitive touch screen), swept frequency capacitance of touch (if using a swept frequency6 capacitive touch screen), swept frequency impedance of touch (if using a swept frequency capacitive touch screen), shape of touch (some touch technologies can provide the actual shape of the touch, and not just a circle or ellipse), image of the hand pose (as imaged by e.g., an optical sensor, diffuse illuminated surface with camera, near-range capacitive sensing). It may be noted that the computation phase may also compute the derivative of one or more of the above features over a short period of time, for example, touch velocity and pressure velocity.


For some embodiments, the time domain and frequency domain representations of the signal, including 1st, 2nd and 3rd order derivatives of such representations may be used as features. For some embodiments, filtered versions of the time domain and frequency domain representations and the 1st, 2nd and 3rd order derivatives of such filtered versions may also be used as features.


The following features may be computed on time domain and frequency domain representations of the signal, including 1st, 2nd and 3rd order derivatives of such representations, and further, filtered versions of the time domain and frequency domain representations and the 1st, 2nd and 3rd order derivatives of such filtered versions: average, standard deviation, standard deviation (normalized by overall amplitude), variance, skewness, kurtosis, sum, absolute sum, root mean square (RMS), crest factor, dispersion, entropy, power sum, center of mass, coefficient of variation, cross correlation (i.e., sliding dot product), zero-crossings, seasonality (i.e., cyclic variation), and DC Bias. Template match scores for a set of known exemplar signals may be performed using the following methods: convolution, inverse filter matching technique, sum-squared difference (SSD), dynamic time warping, and elastic matching.


The following features may be computed on frequency domain representations, including 1st, 2nd and 3rd order derivatives of such representations, and further, filtered versions of the frequency domain representations and the 1st, 2nd and 3rd order derivatives of such filtered versions: spectral centroid, spectral density, spherical harmonics, total average spectral energy, band energy ratio (e.g., for every octave), log spectral band ratios (e.g., for every pair of octaves, and ever pair of thirds), additional vibro-acoustic features, linear prediction-based cepstral coefficients (LPCC), perceptual linear prediction (PLP), cepstral coefficients, cepstrum coefficients, mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC), and frequency phases (e.g., as generated by an FFT).


For some embodiments, all of the above features may be computed on the content of the entire buffer (e.g., 1 ms), and are also computed for sub regions (e.g., around the peak of the waveform, the end of the waveform). For some embodiments, all of the above vibro-acoustic features may be combined to form hybrid features such as, for example, a ratio (e.g., zero-crossings/spectral centroid) or difference (zero-crossings−spectral centroid).


The classification engine may use any number of approaches, including but not limited to basic heuristics, decision trees, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Naïve bayes, elastic matching, dynamic time warping, template matching, k-means clustering, K-nearest neighbors algorithm, neural network, Multilayer perceptron, multinomial logistic regression, Gaussian mixture models, and AdaBoost.


For some embodiments, it may be possible to combine results from several different classifiers, for example, through voting scheme. It may also be possible to use different classifiers based on one or more features. For example, two classifiers may be employed, one for processing sensor waveforms with a high Standard Deviation, and another classifier for waveforms with low Standard Deviation.


The touch screen 100 is an electronic visual display and serves also an input/output device supplementing or substituted for a keyboard, a mouse, and/or other types of devices. The touch screen 100 displays one or more interactive elements such as graphical representation for services or applications designed to perform a specific function on the computing system. Touching the interactive elements with the finger parts of a user, including the conventional tip of the finger, causes the OS 130 to activate the application or service related to the interactive elements appropriate to the identified user. Fingers are diverse appendages, both in their motor capabilities and their anatomical compositions. Different users' fingers have different vibro-acoustic properties due to differences in bone density, fleshiness, skin quality, BMI and the like. A single digit contains different parts such as one or more knuckles, a tip, pad and fingernail. A user who tends to use the same finger part when activating a touch screen may add to the likelihood of a correct user identification.


The fingertip includes the fleshy mass on the palmar aspect of the extremity of the finger, as well as the finger sides up to the distal interphalangeal articulation. It also includes the very tip of the finger (i.e., the distal tip of the distal phalanx). However, the fingernail may not be included in an embodiment as part of fingertip definition, as this is an anatomically distinct feature and region.


The fingernail may encompass all parts of the keratin (or artificial nail material), horn-like envelope covering the dorsal aspect of the terminal phalanges of fingers. The knuckle may include the immediate areas surrounding the boney joints of human fingers, including joints on the thumb, and both major and minor knuckles. The boney regions may be within a 1 cm radius surrounding the metacarpophalangeal joints and interphalangeal articulations.


When an object strikes a certain material, vibro-acoustic waves propagate outward through the material or along the surface of the material. Typically, interactive surfaces use rigid materials, such as plastic or glass, which both quickly distribute and faithfully preserve the signal. As such, when one or more fingers touch or contact the surface of the touch screen 100, vibro-acoustic responses are produced. The vibro-acoustic characteristics of the respective user fingers and their respective unique anatomical characteristics produce unique responses for each user.


Referring back to FIG. 1, the touch event detector 110 detects the touch event entailing the vibro-acoustic signal. The touch event detector 110, for example, may be arranged at a rear side of the touch screen so that the vibro-acoustic signal caused by the touch event can be captured. The touch event detector 110 can be triggered by the onset of the vibro-acoustic signal resulting from the touch event. To capture the touch event and subsequent vibro-acoustic signal, the touch event detector 110 may include one or more impact sensors, vibration sensors, accelerometers, strain gauges, or acoustic sensors such as a condenser microphone a piezoelectric microphone, MEMS microphone and the like. Once the vibro-acoustic signal has been captured by the touch event detector 110, the vibro-acoustic classifier 120 processes the vibro-acoustic signal to distinguish which user activated the touch screen.


The OS 130 runs the computing system so that the function can be activated in line with the classification of the vibro-acoustic signals and the corresponding user. The vibro-acoustic classifier 120 includes a segmentation unit 122 to segment the vibro-acoustic signal into a digital representation; a conversion unit 124 to convert the digitized vibro-acoustic signal into an electrical signal; a feature extraction unit 126 derive a series of features from the electrical signal; and a classification unit 128 to classify each user using the above-described features to distinguish among multiple users.


The segmentation unit 122 may be configured to sample the vibro-acoustic signal, for example, at a sampling rate of 96 kHz, using a sliding window of 4096 samples of the vibro-acoustic signal. The conversion unit 124 may be configured to perform, for example, a Fourier Transform on sampled time-dependent vibro-acoustic signal to produce an electrical signal having frequency domain representation. For example, the Fourier Transform of this window may produce 2048 bands of frequency power.


The vibro-acoustic classifier 120 may be configured to down-sample this data into additional vectors (i.e., buckets often), providing a different aliasing. In addition, additional time-domain features may be calculated from the vibro-acoustic signal, such as the average absolute amplitude, total absolute amplitude, standard deviation of the absolute amplitude, the center of mass for both the segmented input signal and the Fourier Transformed signal, and zero crossings.


The feature extraction unit 126 may be configured to calculate a series of features from the frequency domain representation of the vibro-acoustic signals, such as the fundamental frequency of the impact waveform. The classification unit 128 may be configured to classify the vibro-acoustic signal using the features to distinguish what user generated the touch event, so that the computing system may selectively activate a function related to the identified user depending on the classified vibro-acoustic signals. To aid the classification operation, a user can provide supplemental training samples to the vibro-acoustic classifier 120. For some embodiments, the classification unit 128 may be implemented with a support vector machine (SVM) for feature classification. The SVM is a supervised learning model with associated learning algorithms that analyze data and recognize patterns, used for classification and regression analysis.



FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate an exemplary waveform signal and corresponding frequency spectrum of a touch event of a first user. FIGS. 3A and 3B illustrate an exemplary waveform signal and corresponding frequency spectrum of a touch event of a second user, different from the first user. The differences in waveforms associated with the first user and with the second user as illustrated in FIGS. 2A and 2B versus FIGS. 3A and 3B are typical for different users activating a touch screen in different impact actions.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating a process that may be performed to differentiate touch screen users, in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the invention. As shown in block 402, when a user touches a touch screen, a touch event is detected. The touch event entailing the vibro-acoustic signal. At block 404, a waveform is generated based on detection of the touch event in block 402. At block 406, the waveform generated in block 404 is converted into another form. At block 408, distinguishing features are extracted. At block 410, the extracted features are associated with a particular user. In a common architecture, the data storage in which the algorithm for executing or assisting with execution of the operations shown in FIG. 4 includes a machine-readable medium which stores the main body of instructions (e.g., software). The instructions may also reside, completely or at least partially, within a memory or within a processor (e.g., within a processor's cache memory) of a host device (e.g. a cell phone, kiosk, or a laptop computer) during execution. The memory and the processor also constitute machine-readable media.


These and other aspects of the disclosure may be implemented by various types of hardware, software, firmware, etc. For example, some features of the disclosure may be implemented, at least in part, by machine-readable media that include program instructions, state information, etc., for performing various operations described herein. Examples of program instructions include both machine code, such as produced by a compiler, and files containing higher-level code that may be executed by the computer using an interpreter. Examples of machine-readable media include, but are not limited to, magnetic media such as hard disks, floppy disks, and magnetic tape; optical media such as CD-ROM disks; magneto-optical media; and hardware devices that are specially configured to store and perform program instructions, such as read-only memory (“ROM”) and random access memory (“RAM”).


Any of the above embodiments may be used alone or together with one another in any combination. Although various embodiments may have been motivated by various deficiencies with the prior art, which may be discussed or alluded to in one or more places in the specification, the embodiments do not necessarily address any of these deficiencies. In other words, different embodiments may address different deficiencies that may be discussed in the specification. Some embodiments may only partially address some deficiencies or just one deficiency that may be discussed in the specification, and some embodiments may not address any of these deficiencies.


While various embodiments have been described herein, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present application should not be limited by any of the embodiments described herein, but should be defined only in accordance with the following and later-submitted claims and their equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for differentiating touch screen users based on characterization of features derived from touch event acoustics and mechanical impact, the apparatus comprising: a touch sensitive surface for detecting a touch event from at least one user;at least one sensor for generating a waveform signal in response to the touch event;a converter for converting the waveform signal into at least a domain signal;a feature extractor for extracting distinguishing features from the domain signal; anda classification unit for employing the distinguishing features of the feature extractor to associate the distinguishing features of the domain signal with touch feature properties for a particular user.
  • 2. The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor comprises a senor for detecting an acoustic effect of the touch event.
  • 3. The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor comprises a senor for detecting a mechanical impact effect of the touch event.
  • 4. The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the domain signal is a time domain signal.
  • 5. The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the domain signal is a frequency domain signal.
  • 6. The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the distinguishing features depend at least in part on physical characteristics of a finger used to create the touch event.
  • 7. The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the distinguishing features depend at least in part on the magnitude of an impact used to create the touch event.
  • 8. The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor comprises a sensor for detecting vibrations initiated by the touch event.
  • 9. The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the at least one sensor comprises a sensor taken from a group of sensors consisting of impact sensors, vibration sensors, accelerometers, strain gauges, piezo-electric devices and acoustic sensors.
  • 10. The apparatus recited in claim 1, wherein the distinguishing features are extracted based on at least one computation of a characteristic taken from a group consisting of average, standard deviation, variance, skewness, kurtosis, sum, root mean square, crest factor, dispersion, entropy, power sum, center of mass, coefficient of variation, cross-correlation, zero-crossings, seasonality, direct current bias, spectral centroid, spectral density, spherical harmonics, spectral energy, band energy ratio, by spectral band ratios, cepstral coefficients and fast Fourier transform content.
  • 11. A computer-implemented method for differentiating touch screen users based on characterization of features derived from touch event acoustics and mechanical impact, the computer-implemented method comprising the following steps: detecting a touch event on a touch sensitive surface;generating a waveform signal using at least one sensor detecting the touch event;converting the waveform signal into at least a domain signal;extracting distinguishing features from the domain signal; andemploying the distinguishing features to associate the distinguishing features of the domain signal with touch feature properties for a particular user.
  • 12. The computer-implemented method recited in claim 11, wherein the generating comprises using the at least one sensor for detecting an acoustic effect of a touch event.
  • 13. The computer-implemented method recited in claim 11, wherein the generating comprises using the at least one sensor for detecting a mechanical impact effect of the touch event.
  • 14. The computer-implemented method recited in claim 11, wherein the converting comprises converting the waveform signal into a time domain signal.
  • 15. The computer-implemented method recited in claim 11, wherein the converting comprises converting the waveform signal into a frequency domain signal.
  • 16. The computer-implemented method recited in claim 11, wherein the extracting comprises determining at least a portion of the distinguishing features based at least in part on physical characteristics of a finger used to create the touch event.
  • 17. The computer-implemented method recited in claim 11, wherein the extracting comprises determining at least a portion of the distinguishing features based at least in part on magnitude of an impact used to create the touch event.
  • 18. The computer-implemented method recited in claim 11, wherein the generating comprises using the at least one sensor to detect vibrations initiated by the touch event.
  • 19. The computer-implemented method recited in claim 11, wherein the at least one sensor comprises a sensor taken from a group of sensors consisting of impact sensors, vibration sensors, accelerometers, strain gauges, piezo-electric devices and acoustic sensors.
  • 20. The computer-implemented method recited in claim 11, wherein the distinguishing features are extracted based on at least one computation of a characteristic taken from a group consisting of average, standard, deviation, variance, skewness, kurtosis, sum, root mean square, crest factor, dispersion, entropy, power sum, center of mass, coefficient variation, cross-correlation, zero-crossings, seasonality, direct current bias, spectral centroid, spectral density, spherical harmonics, spectral energy, band energy ratio, log spectral band ratios, cepstral coefficients and fast Fourier transform content.
  • 21. A non-transitory computer readable medium containing program instructions for using detected touch screen events to associate particular users with the detected touch screen events, wherein execution of the program instructions by a processor causes the processor to carry out the steps of: generating a waveform signal using at least one sensor detecting a touch event;converting the waveform signal into at least a domain signal;extracting distinguishing features from the domain signal; andemploying the distinguishing features to associate the distinguishing features of the domain signal with touch feature properties for a particular user.
  • 22. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 21, wherein the generating comprises using the at least one sensor for detecting an acoustic effect of the touch event.
  • 23. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 21, wherein the generating comprises using the at least one sensor for detecting a mechanical impact effect of the touch event.
  • 24. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 21, wherein the converting comprises converting the waveform signal into a time domain signal.
  • 25. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 21, wherein the converting comprises converting the waveform signal into a frequency domain signal.
  • 26. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 21, wherein the extracting comprises determining at least a portion of the distinguishing features based at least in part on physical characteristics of a finger used to create the touch event.
  • 27. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 21, wherein the extracting comprises determining at least a portion of the distinguishing features based at least in part on magnitude of an impact used to create the touch event.
  • 28. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 21, wherein the generating comprises using the at least one sensor to detect vibrations initiated by the touch event.
  • 29. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 21, wherein the at least one sensor comprises a sensor taken from a group of sensors consisting of impact sensors, vibration sensors, accelerometers, strain gauges, piezo-electric devices and acoustic sensors.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to U.S. application No. 14/483,150, filed Sep. 11, 2014 by Julia Schwarz et al., now U.S. Pat. No. 9,329,715, issued May 3, 2016.

US Referenced Citations (291)
Number Name Date Kind
2008028 Mccortney et al. Jul 1935 A
2430005 Denneen et al. Nov 1947 A
3354531 Pryor Nov 1967 A
4561105 Crane et al. Dec 1985 A
4597932 Kurihara et al. Jul 1986 A
4686332 Greanias et al. Aug 1987 A
5483261 Yasutake Jan 1996 A
5544265 Bozinovic et al. Aug 1996 A
5596656 Goldberg Jan 1997 A
5615285 Beemink Mar 1997 A
5625818 Zarmer et al. Apr 1997 A
5666438 Beemink et al. Sep 1997 A
5867163 Kurtenbach Feb 1999 A
5933514 Ostrem et al. Aug 1999 A
6028593 Rosenberg et al. Feb 2000 A
6118435 Fujita et al. Sep 2000 A
6208330 Hasegawa et al. Mar 2001 B1
6212295 Ostrem et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222465 Kumar et al. Apr 2001 B1
6246395 Goyins et al. Jun 2001 B1
6252563 Tada et al. Jun 2001 B1
6323846 Westerman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6337698 Kelly, Jr. et al. Jan 2002 B1
6492979 Kent et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504530 Wilson et al. Jan 2003 B1
6643663 Dabney et al. Nov 2003 B1
6707451 Nagaoka Mar 2004 B1
6748425 Duffy et al. Jun 2004 B1
6772396 Cronin et al. Aug 2004 B1
6933930 Devige et al. Aug 2005 B2
6943665 Chornenky Sep 2005 B2
7050955 Carmel et al. May 2006 B1
7084884 Nelson et al. Aug 2006 B1
7098896 Kushler et al. Aug 2006 B2
7212197 Schkolne et al. May 2007 B1
7443396 Ilic Oct 2008 B2
7581194 Iwema et al. Aug 2009 B2
7982724 Hill Jul 2011 B2
8086971 Radivojevic et al. Dec 2011 B2
8144126 Wright Mar 2012 B2
8154524 Wilson et al. Apr 2012 B2
8154529 Sleeman et al. Apr 2012 B2
8170346 Ludwig May 2012 B2
8199126 Taubman Jun 2012 B1
8253744 Macura et al. Aug 2012 B2
8269744 Agari et al. Sep 2012 B2
8327029 Purser Dec 2012 B1
8441790 Pance et al. May 2013 B2
8547357 Aoyagi Oct 2013 B2
8624878 Sarwar et al. Jan 2014 B2
8670632 Wilson Mar 2014 B2
8674943 Westerman et al. Mar 2014 B2
8743091 Bernstein Jun 2014 B2
8760395 Kim et al. Jun 2014 B2
8762332 Keebler et al. Jun 2014 B2
8769524 Bhullar et al. Jul 2014 B2
9013452 Harrison et al. Apr 2015 B2
9019244 Harrison Apr 2015 B2
9030498 Galor et al. May 2015 B2
9052772 West Jun 2015 B2
9060007 Keebler et al. Jun 2015 B2
9182882 Fowler et al. Nov 2015 B2
9329688 Harrison May 2016 B2
9329715 Schwarz et al. May 2016 B2
9377863 Bychkov et al. Jun 2016 B2
9557852 Tsai et al. Jan 2017 B2
9612689 Harrison et al. Apr 2017 B2
9696859 Heller et al. Jul 2017 B1
9864453 Munemoto et al. Jan 2018 B2
10082935 Harrison et al. Sep 2018 B2
20020009227 Goldberg et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020057837 Wilkinson et al. May 2002 A1
20020070927 Fujitsuka et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020126161 Kuzunuki et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030048260 Matusis Mar 2003 A1
20030110085 Murren et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030132922 Phillip Jul 2003 A1
20030217873 Paradiso et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040012573 Morrison et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040021681 Liao Feb 2004 A1
20040054711 Multer Mar 2004 A1
20040141010 Fitzmaurice et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040160421 Sullivan Aug 2004 A1
20040199867 Brandenborg Oct 2004 A1
20040225730 Brown et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050083313 Hardie-Bick Apr 2005 A1
20050131778 Bennett et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050146512 Hill et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050289461 Amado et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060010400 Dehlin et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060026535 Hotelling et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060031746 Toepfer et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060152499 Roberts Jul 2006 A1
20060173985 Moore Aug 2006 A1
20060184617 Nicholas et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060217126 Sohm et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060230021 Diab et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060288329 Gandhi et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070011205 Majjasie et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070044010 Sull et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070075965 Huppi et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070085157 Fadell et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100959 Eichstaedt et al. May 2007 A1
20070109279 Sigona May 2007 A1
20070126716 Haverty Jun 2007 A1
20070168367 Dickinson et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070186157 Walker et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070192674 Bodin et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070245020 Ott, IV Oct 2007 A1
20070257767 Beeson Nov 2007 A1
20070291297 Harmon et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080005666 Sefton et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080036743 Westerman et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080042978 Perez-Noguera Feb 2008 A1
20080082941 Goldberg et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080103906 Singh May 2008 A1
20080117168 Liu et al. May 2008 A1
20080126388 Naaman May 2008 A1
20080141132 Tsai Jun 2008 A1
20080155118 Glaser et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080158147 Westerman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080158168 Westerman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080158185 Westerman Jul 2008 A1
20080168403 Westerman et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080180406 Han et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080244468 Nishihara et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080288347 Sifry Nov 2008 A1
20080319932 Yih et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090025987 Perksi et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090073144 Chen et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090095540 Zachut et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090150373 Davis et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090157206 Weinberg et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090174679 Westerman Jul 2009 A1
20090178011 Ording et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090231275 Odgers Sep 2009 A1
20090232355 Minear et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090254869 Ludwig et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090259628 Farrell et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090262637 Badaye et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090315835 De Goes et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090318192 Leblanc et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100036967 Caine et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100060602 Agari et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100085216 Ms Apr 2010 A1
20100094633 Kawamura et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100123666 Wickholm et al. May 2010 A1
20100127997 Park et al. May 2010 A1
20100194703 Fedor et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100214267 Radivojevic et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100225601 Homma et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100251112 Hinckley et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100265185 Oksanen Oct 2010 A1
20100271322 Kondoh et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100274622 Kennedy et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100279738 Kim et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100289754 Sleeman et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100302184 East et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100306649 Russ et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100309158 Iwayama et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100309933 Stark et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110003550 Klinghult et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110007000 Lim Jan 2011 A1
20110018825 Kondo Jan 2011 A1
20110057670 Jordan Mar 2011 A1
20110057885 Lehtovirta Mar 2011 A1
20110074544 D'Souza Mar 2011 A1
20110074701 Dickinson et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110080349 Holbein et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110133934 Tan et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110134063 Norieda Jun 2011 A1
20110134083 Norieda Jun 2011 A1
20110141066 Shimotani et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110145706 Wilson et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110164029 King et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110167391 Momeyer et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110169763 Westerman et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110169778 Nungester et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110173235 Aman et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110175813 Sarwar et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110175821 King Jul 2011 A1
20110187652 Huibers Aug 2011 A1
20110202848 Ismalon Aug 2011 A1
20110210943 Zaliva Sep 2011 A1
20110231290 Narcisse et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110238613 Shehory et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110246463 Carson, Jr. et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110246503 Bender et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110248927 Michaelis et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110248948 Griffin et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110261083 Wilson Oct 2011 A1
20110298798 Krah Dec 2011 A1
20110310040 Ben-Shalom et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120001875 Li Jan 2012 A1
20120007821 Zaliva Jan 2012 A1
20120007836 Wu et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120011106 Reid et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120019562 Park et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120051596 Darnell et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120056846 Zaliva Mar 2012 A1
20120078942 Cai et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120096041 Rao et al. Apr 2012 A1
20120113017 Benko et al. May 2012 A1
20120120000 Lucic et al. May 2012 A1
20120131139 Siripurapu et al. May 2012 A1
20120146938 Worfolk et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120150871 Hua et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120158629 Hinckley et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120200517 Nikolovski Aug 2012 A1
20120206330 Cao et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120262407 Hinckley et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120274583 Haggerty Nov 2012 A1
20120280827 Kashiwagi et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120280927 Ludwig Nov 2012 A1
20120287056 Ibdah Nov 2012 A1
20120287076 Dao et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120313969 Szymczyk et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120324349 Pop-Lazarov et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130009896 Zaliva Jan 2013 A1
20130014248 McLaughlin et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130027404 Sarnoff Jan 2013 A1
20130038554 West Feb 2013 A1
20130091123 Chen et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130100071 Wright et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130176264 Alameh et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130176270 Cattivelli et al. Jul 2013 A1
20130179773 Lee Jul 2013 A1
20130187883 Lim Jul 2013 A1
20130215070 Sasaki Aug 2013 A1
20130234982 Kang Sep 2013 A1
20130246861 Colley et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130257757 Kim Oct 2013 A1
20130265269 Sharma et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130285942 Ko Oct 2013 A1
20130287273 Huang Oct 2013 A1
20130307814 Chang Nov 2013 A1
20130307828 Miller et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130316813 Derome et al. Nov 2013 A1
20130328813 Kuo et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130335333 Kukulski et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140007002 Chang et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140009401 Bajaj et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140022189 Sheng et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140032880 Ka Jan 2014 A1
20140037951 Shigetomi et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140071095 Godsill Mar 2014 A1
20140082545 Zhai et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140104191 Davidson et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140104192 Davidson et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140104274 Hilliges et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140109004 Sadhvani et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140168116 Sasselli et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140208275 Mongia et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140210788 Harrsion et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140210791 Hanauer et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140240271 Land et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140240295 Harrison Aug 2014 A1
20140253477 Shim et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140267065 Levesque Sep 2014 A1
20140267085 Li et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140289659 Harrison et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140300559 Tanimoto et al. Oct 2014 A1
20140327626 Harrison et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140331313 Kim et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140368436 Abzarian et al. Dec 2014 A1
20150002405 Kuan et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150035759 Harrison et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150077378 Duffield Mar 2015 A1
20150145820 Huang et al. May 2015 A1
20150242009 Xiao et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150253858 Koukoumidis et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150293592 Cheong et al. Oct 2015 A1
20160012348 Johnson et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160018942 Kang et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160062545 Lai Mar 2016 A1
20160077615 Schwarz et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160077650 Durojaiye et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160077664 Harrison et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160085324 Schwarz et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160085333 Christopher Mar 2016 A1
20160085372 Munemoto et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160098185 Xiao et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160117015 Veneri et al. Apr 2016 A1
20160156837 Rodzevski et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160171192 Holz et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160224145 Harrison et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160231865 Harrison et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160299615 Schwarz et al. Oct 2016 A1
20170024892 Harrison et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170060279 Harrison Mar 2017 A1
20170153705 Kim et al. Jun 2017 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (47)
Number Date Country
1797305 Jul 2006 CN
1928781 Mar 2007 CN
101111817 Jan 2008 CN
101299174 Nov 2008 CN
101339477 Jan 2009 CN
101410781 Apr 2009 CN
101424974 May 2009 CN
101438218 May 2009 CN
101763190 Jun 2010 CN
101763193 Jun 2010 CN
101921610 Dec 2010 CN
101968696 Feb 2011 CN
102153776 Aug 2011 CN
102362249 Feb 2012 CN
102789332 Nov 2012 CN
103150019 Jun 2013 CN
104020878 Sep 2014 CN
0 938 039 Aug 1999 EP
1 659 481 May 2006 EP
1 762 926 Mar 2007 EP
2 136 358 Dec 2009 EP
2 280 337 Feb 2011 EP
2 344 894 Jun 2000 GB
2 468 742 Sep 2010 GB
H09-69137 Mar 1997 JP
2004-213312 Jul 2004 JP
2005-018611 Jan 2005 JP
2007-524970 Aug 2007 JP
2009-543246 Dec 2009 JP
2011-028555 Feb 2011 JP
2013-519132 May 2013 JP
2013-532495 Aug 2013 JP
10-2002-0075283 Oct 2002 KR
10-2011-0061227 Jun 2011 KR
10-2012-0100351 Sep 2012 KR
94-04992 Mar 1994 WO
2006070044 Jul 2006 WO
2008126347 Oct 2008 WO
2009071919 Jun 2009 WO
2011096694 Aug 2011 WO
2012064034 May 2012 WO
2012166277 Dec 2012 WO
2013059488 Apr 2013 WO
WO-2013059488 Apr 2013 WO
2013061998 May 2013 WO
2014037951 Mar 2014 WO
2014182435 Nov 2014 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (237)
Entry
Sarah, M. K. et aL, “A Personal Touch—Recognizing Users Based on Touch Screen Behavior,” PhoneSense'12, Nov. 6, 2012, Toronto, ON, Canada, Nov. 6, 2012, pp. 5.
Schwarz, J. et al., “Probabilistic Palm Rejection Using Spatiotemporal Touch Features and Iterative Classification,” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2009-2012, Apr. 26-May 1, 2014.
Search Report dated Apr. 21, 2017 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580000833.0, 1 page.
“Swype Advanced Tips”, [http://www.swype.com/tips/advanced-tips], Jun. 25, 2014, retrieved via the Wayback Machine on Jun. 29, 2018, [https:web.archive.org/web/20140625073212/http://www.swype.com/tips/advanced-tips], 2 pages.
“Swype Basics”, [http://www.swype.com/tips/swype-basics], retrieved via the Wayback Machine dated Jun. 14, 2014, retrieved via the Wayback Machine on Jun. 29, 2018, [https:web.archive.org/web/20140614200707/http://www.swype.com/tips/swype-basics, 2 pages.
“Swype Tips”, [http://www.swype.com/category/tips], Jul. 2, 2014, retrieved via the Wayback Machine on Jun. 29, 2018, [https:web.archive.org/web/20140702102357/http://www.swype.com/category/tips, 2 pages.
Kherallah, Metal., “On-line handwritten digit recognition based on trajectory and velocity modeling,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 29, Issue 5, pp. 580-594, Apr. 1, 2008.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/856,414, 17 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/958,427, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 19, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/869,998, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,041, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Dec. 20, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/834,434, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/191,329, 18 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 11, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/390,831, 79 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 17, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/073,407, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 19, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/219,919, 20 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,089, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated May 7, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/191,329, 17 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated May 9, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,711, 27 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 15, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/198,062, 24 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 24, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/191,329, 31 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 8, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/958,427, 15 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/406,770, 12 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 19, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/668,870, 6 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/275,124, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 25, 2013 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/410,956, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 28, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/390,831, 22 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/492,604, 14 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 26, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/849,698, 27 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 6, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/751,589, 27 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jul. 30, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/406,770, 20 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 2, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/780,494, 43 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/486,800, 25 pages.
Final Office Action dated Aug. 8, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/834,434, 19 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 2, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,193, 41 pages.
Final Office Action dated Mar. 4, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,193, 50 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 7, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,193, 58 pages.
Final Office Action dated Sep. 15, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,193, 50 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Apr. 6, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,193, 70 pages.
Final Office Action dated Jan. 9, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,193, 50 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated May 22, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/863,193, 73 pages.
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 1, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/856,414, 28 pages.
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510240522.3 dated Jun. 28, 2018, 30 pages.
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280062500.7, dated Apr. 27, 2018, 19 pages.
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280062500.7, dated Oct. 10, 2018, 14 pages.
Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/886,562, 44 pages.
Office Action dated Aug. 10, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/886,562, 86 pages.
Japanese Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2018 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-049566, 9 pages (including English translation).
Korean Office Action dated Jan. 10, 2019 for Korean Patent Application No. 2014-7010323, 11 pages (including English translation).
Office Action dated Jan. 28, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/836,798, 30 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/492,604, filed Sep. 22, 2014, titled: “Method and Apparatus for Improving Accuracy of Touch Screen Event Analysis by Use of Edge Classification.” 35 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,041, filed Sep. 24, 2014, titled: “Method for Improving Accuracy of Touch Screen Event Analysis by Use of Spatiotemporal Touch Patterns.” 34 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/483,150, filed Sep. 11, 2014, titled: “Method and Apparatus for Differentiating Touch Screen Users Based on Touch Event Analysis.” 38 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,127, filed Apr. 1, 2014, titled: Method and Apparatus for Classifying DTouch Events on a Touch Sensitive Surface, 36 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/849,698, filed Mar. 23, 2013, titled: “Method and System for Activating Different Interactive Functions Using Different Types of Finger Contacts.” 52 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/780,494, filed Feb. 28, 2013, titled: “Input Tools Having Viobro-Acoustically Distinct Regions and Computing Device for Use With the Same.” 34 pages.
Final Office Action dated Jul. 12, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,041, 14 pages.
Final Office Action dated Jul. 18, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/191,329, 17 pages.
Final Office Action dated Jun. 8, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,041, 16 pages.
Final Office Action dated Jun. 30, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/958,427, 15 pages.
Final Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/219,919, 21 pages.
Final Office Action dated Mar. 28, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/958,427, 16 pages.
Final Office Action dated May 6, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/191,329, 17 pages.
Final Office Action dated May 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/390,831, 6 pages.
Final Office Action dated May 20, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/503,894, 17 pages.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 9,2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,089, 11 pages.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 23, 2015 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/668,870, 14 pages.
Final Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/486,800, 17 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 8, 2013 in International Application No. PCT/CA2013/000292, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jun. 6, 2012 in International Patent Application No. PCT/CA2012/050127, 10 pages.
“Making it Easier to Share With Who You Want,” Facebook, Aug. 23, 2011, last updated on Dec. 12, 2012 retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook/making-it-easier-to-share-with-who-you-want/10150251867797131/, retrieved on Jun. 1, 2018, 14 pages.
Cheng, B. et aL, “SilentSense: Silent User Identification via Dynamics of Touch and Movement Behavioral Biometrics,” Cryptography and Security (cs CR); Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 9, Aug. 31, 2013.
S. Furui, “Digital Speech Processing, synthesis, and recognition” Marcel Dekker, Inc. 2001. 40 pages.
English Translation of Chinese Office Action dated Nov. 3, 2017 in Chinese Application No. 201480002856.0, 12 pages.
English Translation of Final Rejection dated Apr. 27, 2015 in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-0027979, 3 pages.
English Translation of Final Rejection dated Dec. 12, 2014 in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2014-0027979, 3 pages.
English Translation of First Office Action dated Feb. 27, 2017 in Chinese Application No. 201480002879.1, 13 pages.
English Translation of First Office Action dated May 2, 2017 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201580000833.0, 9 pages.
English Translation of First Office Action dated Oct. 11, 2017 in Chinese Patent Application No. 20150209998.0, 10 pages.
English Translation of Notification of Reason for Refusal dated Jul. 10, 2014 in Korean patent application No. 10-2014-0027979, 3 pages.
Final Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/503,894, 16 pages.
English Translation of Second Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2017 in Chinese Application No. 201480002879.1, 14 pages.
English Translation of Third Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2017 in Chinese Application No. 201480002879.1, 4 pages.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Feb. 26, 2018 for European Patent Application No. 14785422.8, 7 pages.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Mar. 5, 2018 for European Patent Application No. 14794212.2, 5 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Apr. 16, 2018 in European Application No. 15845310.0, 7 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 11, 2016 in European Patent Application No. 14785422.8, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 25, 2017 in European Patent Application No. 157 48667.1, 10 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Jul. 22, 2014 in European Patent Application No. 12755563.9, 5 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 16, 2018 in European Patent Application No. 15842839.1, 7 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 19, 2018 in European Patent Application No. 15840819.5, 9 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 19, 2018 in European Patent Application No. 15843933.1, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated Mar. 27, 2018 in European Patent Application No. 15843989.3, 8 pages.
Extended European Search Report dated May 14, 2018 in European Patent Application No. 15847469.2, 11 pages.
Weidong, S. et al., “SenGuard: Passive user identification on smartphones using multiple sensors,” IEEE 7th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), pp. 141-148, 2011.
Final Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/486,800, 14 pages.
Final Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/492,604, 16 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 9, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,711, 24 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Sep. 29, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/834,434, 12 pages.
Pedro, L et al., “Augmenting touch interaction through acoustic sensing”, Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces, pp. 53-56, Nov. 13-16, 2011.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/075,648 dated Dec. 21, 2018, 13 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/815,679 dated Sep. 28, 2018, 69 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/198,062 dated Sep. 6, 2018, 32 pages.
Chinese Office Action dated Apr. 21, 2017 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480022056.5, 23 pages. (with Translation).
Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 9, 2018 for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480022056.5, 19 pages. (with Translation).
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/126,175 dated Nov. 1, 2018, 86 pages.
Third Chinese Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201480022056.5 dated Jul. 19, 2018, 6 pages (with English translation).
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 14785422.8 dated Nov. 22, 2018, 5 pages.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 15845310.0 dated Jan. 3, 2019, 4 pages.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 15840819.5 dated Jan. 23, 2019, 6 pages.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 15842839.1 dated Apr. 9, 2019, 7 pages.
Chinese First Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510240372.6 dated Sep. 27, 2018, 18 pages.
Chinese Second Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510240372.6 dated May 15, 2019, 16 pages.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for European Patent Application No. 15843933.1 dated Jan. 23, 2019, 6 pages.
Chinese Search Report received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201580053216.7, dated Apr. 16, 2019, 2 pages.
European Search Report received for European Patent Application No. 16839786.7, dated Feb. 12, 2019, 8 pages.
Communication pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC received for European Patent Application No. 16839786.7 dated Mar. 1, 2019, 1 page.
Chinese Second Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201580000833.0 dated Jan. 15, 2018, 17 pages.
European Search Report received for European Patent Application No. 16818725.0, dated Dec. 21, 2018, 8 pages.
Communication pursuant to Rules 70(2) and 70a(2) EPC received for European Patent Application No. 16818725.0 dated Jan. 8, 2019, 1 page.
First Office Action received for Canadian Patent Application No. 2869699, dated Nov. 27, 2014, 3 pages.
Second Office Action received for Canadian Patent Application No. 2869699, dated Jun. 14, 2016, 4 pages.
Third Office Action received for Canadian Patent Application No. 2869699, dated Jan. 9, 2017, 3 pages.
First Examination report received for Australian Patent Application No. 2012225130, dated Feb. 9, 2015, 4 pages.
First Office Action received for Canadian Patent Application No. 2802746, dated Apr. 9, 2013, 3 pages.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC received for European Patent Application No. 14832247.2 dated May 3, 2019, 7 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/075,648 dated May 31, 2019, 17 pages.
European Search Report dated Apr. 8, 2019 for European Application No. 18195588.1, 7 pages.
Office Action dated Jul. 5, 2019 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/836,798, 95 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/684,407 dated Jan. 18, 2017, 20 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/684,407 dated Aug. 2, 2017, 14 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/684,407 dated Mar. 12, 2018, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/612,089 dated May 31, 2017, 21 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/073,407, dated Dec. 20, 2016, 49 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/958,427, dated Nov. 10, 2016, 22 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/219,919, dated Aug. 26, 2016, 24 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/191,329, dated Feb. 2, 2017, 20 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,711, dated Jun. 8, 2017, 33 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/075,648, dated Apr. 21, 2017, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/486,800, dated Dec. 1, 2016, 29 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/492,604, dated Mar. 17, 2017, 37 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,041, dated Nov. 25, 2016, 35 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/503,894, dated May 16, 2017, 33 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/684,407, dated Sep. 14, 2018, 24 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/834,434, dated May 1, 2017, 18 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/751,589, dated Jun. 13, 2016, 20 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/044552; dated Oct. 17, 2016, 14 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/040194; dated Sep. 19, 2016, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/051582; dated Feb. 26, 2016, 12 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/051106; dated Jan. 28, 2016, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/047616; dated Jul. 1, 2016, 7 pages.
European Patent Office Extended Search Report for EP 14 83 2247; dated Feb. 23, 2017, 11 pages.
European Patent Office Extended Search Report for EP 14 79 4212; dated Nov. 9, 2016, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/958,427, dated Mar. 13, 2015, 50 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/958,427, dated Jun. 19, 2015, 17 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,711, dated Apr. 6, 2015, 36 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/191,329, dated Aug. 7, 2015, 29 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/492,604, dated Oct. 1, 2015, 16 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/049485 dated Nov. 17, 2014, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/033380 dated Mar. 13, 2015, 7 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/034977 dated Sep. 18, 2014, 8 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/483,150 dated Dec. 18, 2015, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action—dated Oct. 2, 2015 U.S. Appl. No. 14/486,800 filed Sep. 15, 2014, 21 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/503,894, dated Dec. 30, 2015, 18 pages.
Non-Final Office Action—dated Jan. 29, 2016 U.S. Appl. No. 14/219,919, 11 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received dated Nov. 5, 2015 U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,711, 19 pages.
Final Office Action dated Feb. 24, 2016 U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,711, 23 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/051355; dated Dec. 15, 2015, 9 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/047428; dated Nov. 27, 2015, 6 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/050570; dated Dec. 17, 2015, 8 pages.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/014581; dated May 14, 2015, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action—dated Oct. 7, 2015 U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,041, 14 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 13, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 15/073,407, 49 pages.
Final Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/849,698, 21 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Jun. 24, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/849,698, 21 pages.
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/780,494, 10 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/958,427, filed Aug. 2, 2013, titled: “Capture ofVibro-Acoustic Data Used to Determine Touch Types.”.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/191,329, filed Feb. 26, 2014, titled: “Using Capacitive Images for Touch Type Classification.”.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,711, filed May 6, 2013, titled: “Using Finger Touch Types to Interact with Electronic Devices.”.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,127 dated Jun. 2, 2015, 33 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,127 dated Sepetmber 18, 2015, 28 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,127 dated Dec. 28, 2015, 38 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,127 dated Mar. 31, 2016, 34 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,127 dated Apr. 13, 2016, 18 pages.
Notice of Allowance received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/242,127 dated Sep. 2, 2016, 16 pages.
Asano et al., “Real-Time Sound Source Localization and Separation System and Its Application to Automatic Speech Recognition”, Proceedings of Eurospeech, 2001; p. 1013-1016; 2001.
Benko et al., “Sphere: Multi-Touch Interactions on a Spherical Display”, Proceedings of UIST, 2008; pp. 77-86.
Burges, Christopher J.C., “A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition”, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2, 1998 pp. 121-167.
Cao et al., “ShapeTouch: Leveraging Contact Shape on Interactive Surfaces”, IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer System (TABLETOP), 2008, pp. 139-146.
Deyle et al., “Hambone: A Bio-Acoustic Gesture Interface”, Proceedings of ISWC, 2007, pp. 1-8.
Dietz et al., DT Controls: Adding Identity to Physical Interfaces, ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (UIST), 2005, pp. 245-252.
Dietz et al., “DiamondTouch: A Multi-User Touch Technology” ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (UIST), 2001, pp. 219-226.
Gutwin et al., “Supporting Informal Collaboration in Shared-Workspace Groupware”, Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 14, No. 9, 2008, pp. 1411-1434.
Hall et al., “The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update”, SIGKDD Explorations,vol. 11, No. 1, 2009, pp. 10-18.
Harrison et al., Skinput: Appropriating the Body as an Input Surface, Proceedings of CHI, Apr. 10-15, 2010, pp. 453-462.
Harrison et al., “Scratch Input: Creating Large, Inexpensive, Unpowered and Mobile Finger Input Surfaces”, Proceedings of UIST, 2008, pp. 205-208.
Hartmann et al., “Augmenting Interactive Tables with Mice & Keyboards”, Proceedings of UIST, 2009, pp. 149-152.
Hinckley et al., “Sensor Synaesthesia: Touch in Motion, and Motion in Touch”, Proceedings of CHI, 2011, pp. 801-810.
Hinckley et al., “Pen+ Touch= New Tools”, Proceedings of UIST, 2010, pp. 27-36.
Hinkley et al., “Manual Deskterity: An Exploration of Simultaneous Pen+ Touch Direct Input”, Proceedings of CHI, 2010, pp. 2793-2802.
Holz et al., “The Generalized Perceived Input Point Model and How to Double Touch Accuracy by Extracting Fingerprints” Proceedings of CHI, 2010, pp. 581-590.
Kaltenbrunner., “reacTIVision: A Computer-Vision Framework for Table-Based Tangible Interaction”, Proceedings ofTEl, 2007, pp. 69-74.
Matsushita et al., “HoloWall: Designing a Finger, Hand, Body, and Object Sensitive Wall”, Proceedings of UIST, 1997, pp. 209-210.
“Mimio”, http://www.mimio.com, retrieved Jul. 8, 2019, 8 pages.
Olwal et al., “SurfaceFusion: Unobtrusive Tracking of Everyday Objects in Tangible User Interfaces”, Proceedings of GI, 2008, pp. 235-242.
Paradiso et al., “Tracking and Characterizing Knocks Atop Large Interactive Displays”, Sensor Review, vol. 25, No. 2, 2005, pp. 134-143.
Paradiso et al., “Sensor Systems for Interactive Surfaces”, IBM Systems Journal, vol. 39 No. 3&4, 2000, pp. 892-914.
Patten, James, Mcmichael., “Sensetable: A Wireless Object Tracking Platform for Tangible User Interfaces”, Proceedings of CHI, 2001, pp. 253-260.
Rekimoto et al., “Augmented Surfaces: A Spatially Continuous Work Space for Hybrid Computing Environments”, Proceedings of CHI, 1999, pp. 378-385.
Rekimoto et al., “ToolStone: Effective use of the Physical Manipulation Vocabularies of Input Devices”, Proceedings of UIST, 2000, pp. 109-117.
Rekimoto et al., “SmartSkin: An Infrastructure for Freehand Manipulation on Interactive Surfaces”, Proceedings of CHI, 2002, pp. 113-120.
Vandoren et al., “DIP-IT: Digital Infrared Painting on an Interactive Table”, Proceedings of CHI, 2008, pp. 2901-2906.
Wang et al., “Empirical Evaluation for Finger Input Properties in Multi-Touch Interaction”, Proceedings of CHI, 2009, pp. 1063-1072.
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/060865 dated Mar. 29, 2013, 10 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/206,554 dated Sep. 21, 2016, 36 pages.
Final Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 15/206,554 on Feb. 1, 2017, 20 pages.
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280062500.7 dated Nov. 7, 2016, 9 pages.
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280062500.7 dated Apr. 17, 2017, 15 pages.
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-537253 dated May 16, 2017, 5 pages.
Seo et al.., “Audio Fingerprinting Based on Normalized Spectral Subband Centroids,” Proc. ICASSP, {U.S.A.), 2005, vol. 3, p. 213-216. Retrieved on May 29, 2017, 4 pages.
Kunio, “Audio fingerprinting: Techniques and applications”, Acoustical Science and Technology, The Acoustical Society of Japan, Feb. 1, 2010, vol. 66, No. 2, p. 71-76. Retrieved on May 29, 2017, 6 pages.
European Search Report dated Jul. 24, 2015 for European Application No. 12842495.9, 7 pages.
Chinese Search Report dated Mar. 29, 2016 for Chinese Application No. 201280062500.7, 1 page.
Chinese Office Action dated Apr. 15, 2016 for Chinese Application No. 201280062500.7, 11 pages.
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-537253 dated Nov. 15, 2016, 3 pages.
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-537253 dated Apr. 26, 2016, 3 pages.
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC for EP Application No. 12842495.9 dated Jun. 18, 2018, 4 pages.
Japanese Office Action for Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-049566 dated Jun. 5, 2018, 7 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/684,407 dated Jul. 8, 2016, 11 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/684,407 dated Jun. 10, 2019, 26 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/191,329 dated Jul. 16, 2019, 30 pages.
Chinese First Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application Serial No. 201580051873.8 dated Jun. 21, 2019, 15 pages (Including English Translation).
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/887,711 dated Jul. 25, 2019, 24 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/684,407 dated Sep. 20, 2019, 26 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/495,041 dated Aug. 9, 2019, 26 pages.
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 14/834,434 dated Aug. 5, 2019, 19 pages.
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 16/126,175 dated Aug. 2, 2019, 161 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170024055 A1 Jan 2017 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14483150 Sep 2014 US
Child 15075648 US