The invention relates to the control of Track Mis-Registration (TMR) in a hard disk drive, in particular, to control of TMR through the use and structure of a disk damper to the control of air turbulence around a head stack assembly and the control of vibration of the disks in the hard disk drive.
Hard disk drives include at least one read-write head embedded in a slider and positioned near a rotating disk surface to access data organized as tracks on a rotating disk surface. Typically, the tracks are concentrically arranged on the rotating disk surface. The read-write head is positioned near the track by a voice coil actuator, which moves the slider through an actuator arm. The voice coil actuator includes a voice coil, which is stimulated by a time varying electrical signal from a servo controller. The time varying signal causes the voice coil to interact with fixed magnets, and pivot the actuator assembly it is coupled with, moving the actuator arm, and positioning the read-write head.
Often a hard disk drive has multiple read-write heads, accessing multiple rotating disk surfaces. Often a hard disk drive may include more than one disk. Each disk can support up to two disk surfaces for data storage.
There are typically two separate operations required to position the read-write head to access a track. First, a track seek operation is performed. This brings the read-write head close to the track. Then a track following operation is performed while the read-write head actively accesses the data. While following the track, a Position Error Signal (PES) is actively sensed by the interface circuitry coupled with the read channel of the read-write head. The PES is a distance measure derived from an encoded pattern laid down on the disk surface before the track data is actually written. The following of the track uses the PES signal to estimate distance from the written track, and adjust the voice coil stimulus, and possibly also control a micro-actuator coupled to the slider, to refine the positioning of the read-write head and optimize the reliability of the access operation being performed. TMR is usually measured as the acceptable amount of positional error for the read-write head on the servo track pattern.
The manufacturers of hard disk drives are constantly challenged to increase track density, to put more information onto each rotating disk surface of the hard disk drive. This has made the acceptable level of PES smaller and smaller. Recently, the TMR has become less than 10 nano-meters (nm).
Vibration of the disks and vibration of the head stack assembly containing the sliders are often considered today to be the most significant contributors to the PES errors of the track following operation. And airflow near the head stack assembly, particularly turbulent airflow, significantly contributes to vibration of the head stack assembly.
In the last few years, the use of disk dampers has become common. These devices narrow the gap between the rotating disk surfaces and the nearest stationary walls, affecting the air flowing in the gap to minimize the airflow turbulence near the head stack assembly. There are however problems with existing devices. The existing devices do not provide consistent dampening of air flow turbulence, in particular, there is a tendency for increased turbulence when the head stack assembly is near the inside diameter of the rotating disk surfaces. What is needed is a disk damper which consistently dampens air turbulence for a head stack assembly when position anywhere from the inside diameter to the outside diameter.
The invention includes a disk damper containing an extended area located on the upstream side of the head stack assembly and joined to a tail section. In the extended area, the disk damper provides a wall near the neighboring rotating disk surface near every data track, extending from the outside diameter to the inside diameter of the rotating disk surface. Experimental results have shown that this provides much more consistent dampening of disk vibrations and vibrations of the head stack assembly positioned anywhere from the inside diameter to the outside diameter.
The invention includes a hard disk drive including the disk damper providing a wall of the extended area near all the data tracks of the neighboring rotating disk surface. The invention includes using the disk damper in a hard disk drive to improve the reliability of the hard disk drive during track following. The invention also includes making the hard disk drive using the disk damper, and the hard disk drive as a product of that manufacturing process.
The invention relates to the control of Track Mis-Registration (TMR) in a hard disk drive, in particular, to control of TMR through the use and structure of a disk damper to control air turbulence around a head stack assembly and control vibration of the disks in the hard disk drive.
The invention includes a disk damper containing an extended area located on the upstream side of the head stack assembly joined to a tail section. In the extended area, the disk damper provides a wall near the neighboring rotating disk surfaces that extends from the outside diameter to the inside diameter of the rotating disk surfaces. Experimental results have shown that this provides much more consistent dampening of disk vibrations and vibrations of a head stack assembly positioned anywhere from the inside diameter to the outside diameter.
The disk damper 120 shown in
The extended area 126 preferably provides the first wall 130 from an inside diameter 254 to an outside diameter 252 of the first rotating disk surface 220 and provides the second wall 132 from the inside diameter to the outside diameter of the second rotating disk surface 220-2 as shown in
In certain embodiments, the outside diameter 252 of
The gap 230 or distance from a wall of the disk damper to the neighboring rotating disk surface is preferably at most 1 mm. The gap may further be at least 0.3 mm, and preferably at least 0.4 mm. As shown in
The hard disk drive 10 may include more than one disk damper as shown in
More specifically, the second disk damper 120-2 includes a second extended area 126-2 joined to a second tail section 124-2. The second extended area provides the first wall second instance 130-2 from the inside diameter 254 to the outside diameter 252 of the third rotating disk surface 220-3 and provides the second wall second instance 132-2 from the inside diameter to the outside diameter of the fourth rotating disk surface 220-4. The second tail section provides the first wall second instance near the data tracks toward the outside diameter of the third rotating disk surface and provides the second wall second instance near the data tracks toward the outside diameter of the fourth rotating disk surface.
Similarly, the third disk damper 120-3 includes a third extended area 126-3 joined to a third tail section 124-3. The third extended area provides the first wall third instance 130-3 from the inside diameter 254 to the outside diameter 252 of the fifth rotating disk surface 220-5 and provides the second wall sixth instance 132-6 from the inside diameter to the outside diameter of the sixth rotating disk surface 220-6. The third tail section provides the first wall third instance near the data tracks toward the outside diameter of the fifth rotating disk surface and provides the second wall third instance near the data tracks toward the outside diameter of the sixth rotating disk surface.
The invention includes the hard disk drive 10 containing the disk damper 120. The disk damper provides walls of the extended area 126 near all the data tracks of the neighboring rotating disk surfaces. The hard disk drive preferably includes at least two disks, the first disk 12 and the second disk 12-2. The first disk includes the first rotating disk surface 220. The second disk includes the second rotating disk surface 220-2. These two rotating disk surfaces are near the walls of the disk damper as shown in
The hard disk drive 10 may further include a third disk 12-3 and a second disk damper 120-2 as in
Similarly, the hard disk drive 10 may further include a fourth disk 12-4 and a third disk damper 120-3. The third disk 12-3 may include a fifth rotating disk surface 220-5 and the fourth disk may include a sixth rotating disk surface 220-6, both near the walls of the third disk damper.
The invention includes making the hard disk drive using the disk damper, and the hard disk drive as a product of that manufacturing process. Looking at the manufacture of the hard disk drive 10 of
The first disk 12 and the second disk 12-2 are mounted on the spindle motor 80 shown in
The disk cover 110 is later attached to the disk base 100. The voice coil actuator 20 is electrically coupled with a printed circuit board (not shown) to electrically interact with the read-write head and control the voice coil actuator in positioning the read-write head embedded in the slider 60 through the actuator arm 30 over a track of the neighboring rotating disk surface 220.
The read-write head is positioned near the track by the voice coil actuator 20, which moves the slider 60 through an actuator arm 30, as shown in
The invention includes using the disk damper 120 in a hard disk drive 10 to improve the reliability of the hard disk drive during track following.
At the outside diameter 252, labeled OD, the hard disk drive 10 with the invention's disk damper 120 gives an NRRO reduction between 0.8 to 1.2 counts over the hard disk drive with the prior art disk damper. At the Mid Diameter, labeled MD, the hard disk drive 10 gives an NRRO reduction between 0.7 and 1 count over the prior art hard disk drive. At the Inside Diameter 254, labeled ID, the hard disk drive 10 gives a 2 to 2.2 count reduction over the prior art hard disk drive. This shows consistently better track following for the hard disk drive 10, particularly for tracks near the inside diameter.
In the experiments performed with the test hard disk drives, at the outside diameter 252 (OD), the hard disk drive 10 including the invention's disk damper 120 had an NRRO PES of 11.3 counts, whereas the hard disk drive with the prior art disk damper 128 had an NRRO PES of 12.0 counts. At the inside diameter 254 (ID), the hard disk drive 10 including the invention's disk damper 120 had an NRRO PES of 7.3 counts, whereas the hard disk drive with the prior art disk damper 128 had an NRRO PES of 9.8 counts. The NRRO PES spectrum indicates a reduction of the disk resonance peaks in the NRRO spectrum in the 700 to 1500 Hz frequency range as well as the reduction of the flow-induced disturbance of the head stack assembly 40 under 600 Hz frequency, in comparison with the prior art disk damper 128 shown in
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various adaptations and modifications of the just described preferred embodiments can be configured without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Therefore, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/028,078, filed Dec. 30, 2004, now abandoned which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/142,078, filed May 8, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,961,207 and of application Ser. No. 10/100,960, filed Mar. 18, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,771,458 which claimed the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/290,128, filed May 10, 2001, all of which are incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4583213 | Bracken et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
5079660 | Yumura et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5189574 | Imamura et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5417743 | Dauber | May 1995 | A |
5483397 | Gifford et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5625512 | Smith | Apr 1997 | A |
5854725 | Lee | Dec 1998 | A |
5898545 | Schirle | Apr 1999 | A |
5910862 | Ogawa et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6014287 | Ehlers et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6097568 | Ekhoff | Aug 2000 | A |
6236532 | Yanagisawa | May 2001 | B1 |
6239943 | Jennings et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6360843 | Kim et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6407879 | Fruge et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6529345 | Butler et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6717768 | Kim | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6809898 | Prochazka | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7031105 | Kim et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7119986 | Alt et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7310199 | Pottebaum et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7327530 | Lee et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
20020135933 | Harrison et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030076621 | Kim | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099060 | Kang et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030117746 | Kovinskaya et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030147175 | Tadepalli et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000-322870 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000-322871 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000-331460 | Nov 2000 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060171064 A1 | Aug 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60290128 | May 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11028078 | Dec 2004 | US |
Child | 11357824 | US | |
Parent | 10142078 | May 2002 | US |
Child | 11028078 | US | |
Parent | 10100960 | Mar 2002 | US |
Child | 10142078 | US |