Method and apparatus for displaying 3-D state indicators

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7342581
  • Patent Number
    7,342,581
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 17, 2001
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 11, 2008
    18 years ago
Abstract
A method for presenting a user selected status of an object in a three dimensional graphic display is disclosed. The method includes the step of receiving a request to select a property of an object for display. The method further includes the step of displaying at least one property which may be displayed for the object. A selection of a property is received and the value of the selected property for the object is determined. The method further includes the step of generating a status indicator based on the value of the selected property. The status indicator is then displayed relative to the object. In a preferred embodiment, the form of the status indicator is automatically determined by the system. An apparatus for implementing the method is also disclosed.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present system is in the field of systems and articles of manufacture to administer and analyze complex, heterogeneous networked computer systems and other systems that can be monitored by computer technology. More specifically, the present system is directed to systems and articles for enabling user selection and presentation of a property of an object in a three dimensional graphic display.


BACKGROUND

In known system management applications, the visualization of the contents, configuration, and state of the managed system is usually based on some form of display, ranging from a list of items, to icons arrayed in some meaningful way, to 2-D diagrams, to 3-D views. The type of each object may be indicated with an icon of some sort, while the identity and/or state of the object is often rendered in text form. Variations on these themes exist, such as displays that are completely textual and those that use no text at all, but common to all such systems is a core display that shows the objects under management and their relationships.


Using 3-D visualization to render objects conveys a more realistic view of managed objects and their configuration. However, one problem with such a technique is that system management applications typically only show 3-D images of the basic description of the objects, such as their type and inter-connectivity. Another problem is that common system management applications only show fixed properties of the managed objects.


To show the general state of the managed objects, which may include values of their properties, such as state, load, error rate, integrity, and available capacity, known systems typically use some form of visualization appropriate to the metrics of interest. For example, to show the status of the object, an indicator of its essential health, ranging from NORMAL to CRITICAL and also taking on values such as UNKNOWN, it is common to use color, where green might indicate NORMAL, red might indicate CRITICAL and gray or black indicate UNKNOWN.


In real-world displays, it is not practical to surface all the information about the managed object in this core 3-D display. Although some applications have attempted to do this by displaying textual information on planes in 3-D, such displays are harder to read than plain 2-D text because of the limited resolution of current equipment and because current systems do not have enough computational power to anti-alias text or other graphical elements in real time. If this much information is desired, using a 2-D visualization model is considered superior. The benefits of 3-D views appear to be best gained by employing 3-D metaphors.


Some systems generate 3-D bar charts, usually standing on a plane in a regular grid. However, these bar charts have many problems. Most notably, the bars appear to be standing on a totally abstract floor plane, not one that represents the real-world objects interconnected through network links. In addition, such general charting systems are based on collected statistics, and not on real-time monitoring measurements coming out of a management system.


In order to show the other very important and detailed information about the managed objects in a practical way, it is commonplace to provide some mechanism for “drilling down,” thereby retrieving more detailed information about the object from an information store, using a conventional user interface. For example, in network and systems management systems, it is common to surface status in the core display but provide performance and load indicators in other displays that may be brought up from the core display.


Unfortunately, these arrangements have some disadvantages. When additional information is brought up in secondary displays, the secondary displays deviate from the normal navigation conventions of the core 3-D display. In this situation, to see the secondary data on various management objects, it is necessary to first navigate to them, then bring up the secondary display, then navigate to other objects and bring up their secondary displays. Using such an interface is not only cumbersome, but it also impedes a user's ability to compare properties of several objects at once.


In addition, fixed arrangements of this type may not suit every user. For example, while many users may be primarily interested in status and consider load secondary, the person in charge of managing load balancing across the network may be more interested in instantaneous load displays.


Some system management applications provide for customizing the display in two areas. The information displayed in conjunction with the icon in typical displays may be selected from the properties of the objects, so that the icon shows various pieces of information in the form of text, color or other ways. Alternatively, moving the mouse cursor over a symbol in the display may bring up a configurable reticule with labeling, again displaying different properties. This customization is often done specific to each class of object, so different information is displayed about a server and a router, for example. However, this type of configuration is typically static, requiring the user to enter some sort of configuration utility. No known system provides a real time configuration of the display.


SUMMARY

In accordance with the disclosed system, a first method for presenting a status of an object in a three dimensional graphic display is disclosed. The method includes the step of determining a value of a property associated with an object. The method further includes the step of determining a status indicator associated with the property. A status indicator is then generated representing the property associated with the object, and displayed relative to the associated object. In accordance with the disclosed system, a second method for presenting a user selected status of an object in a three dimensional graphic display is disclosed. The method includes the steps of receiving a request to select a property of an object for display and displaying at least one property which may be displayed for the object. The method further includes the step of receiving a selection of a property. The value of the selected property for the object is determined and a status indicator is generated based on the value of the selected property. The status indicator is then displayed relative to the object.


The objects, features and advantages of the disclosed method and system are readily apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numbers indicate like features and wherein:



FIG. 1 illustrates a system according to a preferred embodiment of the present system;



FIG. 2 illustrates a display of the representation of a networked computer system or complex business operation according to a preferred embodiment of the present system;



FIG. 3 illustrates a section of the display in FIG. 2 with an additional information display according to a preferred embodiment of the present system;



FIG. 4 illustrates a section of the display in FIG. 2 with an additional information display and user interface according to a preferred embodiment of the present system;



FIG. 5 illustrates a section of the additional information display of FIG. 3 according to a preferred embodiment of the present system; and



FIG. 6 illustrates a flow chart of a method according to a preferred embodiment of the present system.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The various components that comprise a preferred embodiment of the disclosed network analysis system are shown in FIG. 1. The system includes one or more of a visualization workstation 101, an object repository 102, one or more management applications 103, and one or more agents 104 on each such management application. The visualization workstation 101 interacts primarily with the object repository 102. It requests information from it, it sends commands to it, and it gets notification of events such as status change or object additions from it. The repository 102 in turn gets this information form the various management subsystems 103, which are fed by agents 104 on the managed systems. An important architectural consideration of the present system is that in normal operation, the visualization workstation 101 preferably interacts with the object repository 102. This minimizes network traffic, optimizes the performance of the rendering of the workstation, and minimizes the interconnectivity between the visualization workstation 101 and the multitude of management subsystems and agents existing in practical networks.


Preferably, the management system is based on some type of store, preferably the object repository 102, that holds the description of the structure of the network. This can include the momentary state, load, and performance of the network and the systems. This store may or may not be persistent, it may be populated with a manual process, or with an automatic discovery utility.


According to a preferred embodiment of the present system, as shown in FIG. 2, a management system outputs a display 202 of the managed objects using 3-D models 204 of real-world objects, configured in suitable positions over 3-D sections 208 of a 3-D surface, and interconnected with at least one line 206 that shows a network link, where optional links are shown as dots and dashed lines. The status of each object 204 is indicated with a hovering light 212, whose color indicates status from green through yellow, orange and red. The status of network link 206 may be indicated by coloring the link itself.


Turning to FIG. 3, a more detailed view of the display 202 in FIG. 2 is shown. As seen in FIG. 3, according to a preferred embodiment of the present system the system generates additional objects 302, such as a vertical bar, next to each representation 204 of a “real-world” object. The present system uses these additional objects 302 to indicate in real time quantitative or qualitative measures of the managed objects.


As seen in FIG. 4, an alternative preferred embodiment includes an indicator section 302 that displays other indicators in the core display 202. In this and other alternative preferred embodiments of the disclosed system, the indicator section 302 can include color, animation effects, icon choice, text, bar, line or pie charts near the managed object, and others. The managed objects 204 have a set of properties, some numeric, some textual, and some categorical. Current system management applications support surfacing some fixed set of properties in the core display using fixed indicators, but other properties must be brought up through an explicit request, after which they are visualized using a technique determined by the application.


To overcome these problems, the preferred embodiment of the disclosed system provides an interface 304, preferably a property selection control panel, that permits a user to select properties the user desires to monitor in the indicator section 302 using predetermined indicators. In other embodiments, the user may select a type of indicator to be used from a menu of indicators, such as for example bar graph, indicator light and pie chart.


A user can interact with interface 304 by point-and-click operations after placing a cursor 306 over a box 308, or any similar configuration or arrangement, in the interface 304. After clicking on the box 308, the area chosen by the user is correlated to a predetermined property to be displayed Xn through Xn+m 310, where n and m are integers. In use, Xn through Xn+m are textual representations of the available properties. Thus, in the preferred embodiment of the disclosed system, the indicators 310 are the actual textual names of the properties chosen. Preferably, all properties, are visualized in a standard way after being explicitly requested, so there is no need for customization of the secondary displays.


In the preferred embodiment, after a user interacts with the control panel 304, there is an immediate effect to the indicator section 302 in the display 202, without requiring any complex settings in a dialog box, a confirmation dialog, or even pressing an OK button, which would break the flow of the operation and distract the user from the information displayed.


Further, the property selection control panel 304 preferably acts as an indicator of what information is currently displayed. In the preferred embodiment, distinct indicators for the various types of information are used through bars 312, preferably a yellow-orange-red color range indicates status and shades of blue indicate load. In this way, a knowledgeable user can immediately tell, by looking at the control panel 304 in the display 202, what information is currently displayed. In the preferred embodiment, the control panel 304 shows the current indicators, such as colors or animation effects, as well as the corresponding property, identified by name. Providing both a textual description of the properties and their corresponding visual displays in control panel 304 assists a novice user who may know the meanings of the various visual displays employed by the system.


For example, as seen in FIG. 5, to indicate the real time percentage load of a computer system, the additional object 302a can be a solid bar 304 that reaches up to a corresponding percentage within an empty, transparent bar. In some ways, this resembles a conventional bar chart, with the percentage scale 306 on an x axis above the bar 304, but combined with a 3-D display 202 of real-world objects that are arranged in a way that represents the real-world configuration of these managed objects.


According to a preferred embodiment of the present system, indicator 302 is made translucent. This avoids making the visualization 302 unreadable due to the large number of objects 204 and their quantitative indicators 302, such as the bars 304. The effect is that of “colored water” reaching up to a certain level in a “glass aquarium tank.” The colored area that represents the actual traffic load or performance is colored fairly solidly, just translucent enough to indicate the distinction between this quantitative measure and the real-world objects, and to prevent the quantitative measures from obstructing the view of other objects. The empty part of the tank, representing capacity of the system that is currently not exploited, is almost entirely transparent, rendered just opaque enough to give an impression of a glass tank.


In addition, in alternative preferred embodiments of the present system, the system uses other advanced visualization techniques, such as reflections in the “glass surfaces” and the “edges of the glass tank” to increase the perceived realism and reduce the visual clutter between the managed objects 204 and the quantitative indicators 302.


In FIG. 6, a preferred method 600 is shown. The method starts at 602, after which a request is received to select a property of an object to be displayed at 604. This request is preferably initiated by a user indicating that the user wishes to customize the display, for example by double-clicking on an object or by right-clicking on an object and making a menu selection.


At step 606, the property selection control panel is displayed. The control panel contains at least one property which may be selected for display. A selection of a property from the control panel is received at step 608. The value of the selected property for the object is determined at 610. This determination is preferably performed in real-time with reference to data contained in object repository 102. A status indicator is generated based on the determined value of the selected property at step 612, and the status indicator is displayed at step 614.


Accordingly, it is to be understood that the drawings and description in this disclosure are proffered to facilitate comprehension of the system, and should not be construed to limit the scope thereof It should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the system.

Claims
  • 1. A method for presenting a status of an object in a graphic display, comprising: displaying a plurality of icons, wherein: the icons are associated with a plurality of objects;the icons are three-dimensional graphical models of the associated objects; andthe icons are arranged according to locations of the associated objects as deployed in a network;displaying a control panel associated with a particular icon that represents a particular object, wherein the control panel comprises a plurality of properties;in response to a selection of at least one of the plurality of properties, determining a value of the at least one property associated with the particular object;generating a status indicator representing the determined value; anddisplaying the status indicator.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the status indicator has a translucent quality.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the status indicator has a reflective quality.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the status indicator is depicted as a bar.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein at least one dimension of the bar represents the determined value.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the status indicator is depicted as a quantitative indicator.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the quantitative indicator is a gauge.
  • 8. A method for presenting a user selected status of an object in a graphic display, comprising: displaying a plurality of icons, wherein: the icons are associated with a plurality of objects;the icons are three-dimensional graphical models of the associated objects; andthe icons are arranged according to locations of the associated objects as deployed in a network;receiving a request to select a property of a particular object for display;displaying a control panel associated with a particular icon that represents the particular object, wherein the control panel comprises a plurality of properties;in response to a selection of at least one of the plurality of properties, determining a value of the at least one selected property;generating a status indicator based at least in part on the determined value of the at least one selected property; anddisplaying the status indicator.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein generating a status indicator comprises automatically determining a form of the status indicator.
  • 10. The method of claim 8, further comprising receiving a selection from a user determining a form of the status indicator.
  • 11. The method of claim 8, wherein the status indicator is a bar graph.
  • 12. An apparatus for presenting a status of an object in a graphic display, comprising: a graphical user interface operative to: display a plurality of icons, wherein: the plurality of icons are associated with a plurality of objects;the icons are three-dimensional graphical models of the associated objects; andthe icons are arranged according to locations of the associated objects as deployed in a network; anddisplay a control panel associated with a particular icon that represents a particular object, wherein the control panel comprises a plurality of properties; anda processor operative to: in response to a selection of at least one of the plurality of properties, determine a value of a the at least one property associated with the particular object; andgenerate a status indicator representing the determined value, wherein the status indicator is displayed in association with the particular icon.
  • 13. An apparatus for presenting a user selected status of an object in a graphic display, comprising: a graphical user interface operative to display a plurality of icons, wherein: the icons are associated with a plurality of objects;the icons are three-dimensional graphical models of the associated objects; andthe icons are arranged according to locations of the associated objects as deployed in a network; anda processor operative to: receive a request to select a property of a particular object for display;display at least one property associated with the particular object a control panel associated with a particular icon that represents the particular object; wherein the control panel comprises a plurality of properties;in response to a selection of at least one of the plurality of properties, determine a value of the at least one selected property; andgenerate a status indicator based at least in part on the determined value of the at least one selected property, wherein the status indicator is displayed in association with the particular icon.
  • 14. An apparatus for presenting a status of an object in a graphic display, comprising: means for displaying: a plurality of icons, wherein: the icons are associated with a plurality of objects;the icons are three-dimensional graphical models of the associated objects; andthe icons are arranged according to locations of the associated objects as deployed in a network; anda control panel associated with a particular icon that represents a particular object, wherein the control panel comprises a plurality of properties;means for determining, in response to a selection of at least one of the plurality of properties, a value of the at least one selected property associated with the particular object;means for generating a status indicator representing the determined value; andmeans for displaying the status indicator.
  • 15. An apparatus for presenting a user selected status of an object in a graphic display, comprising: means for displaying a plurality of icons, wherein: the icons are associated with a plurality of objects;the icons are three-dimensional graphical models of the associated objects; andthe icons are arranged according to locations of the associated objects as deployed in a network;means for receiving a request to select a property of a particular object for display;means for displaying a control panel associated with a particular icon that represents the particular object, wherein the control panel comprises a plurality of properties;means for receiving a selection of at least one of the plurality of properties;means for determining a value of the at least one selected property;means for generating a status indicator based at least in part on the determined value of the at least one selected property; andmeans for displaying the status indicator.
  • 16. A computer-readable storage medium encoded with processing instructions for implementing a method for presenting a status of an object in a graphic display, the processing instructions operable when executed to direct a computer to perform the steps of: displaying a plurality of icons, wherein: the icons are associated with a plurality of objects;the icons are three-dimensional graphical models of the associated objects; andthe icons are arranged according to locations of the associated objects as deployed in a network;displaying a control panel associated with a particular icon that represents a particular object, wherein the control panel comprises a plurality of properties;in response to a selection of at least one of the plurality of properties, determining a value of a the at least one property associated with the particular object;generating a status indicator representing the determined value; anddisplaying the status indicator.
  • 17. A computer-readable storage medium encoded with processing instructions for implementing a method for presenting a user selected status of an object in a graphic display, the processing instructions operable when executed to direct a computer to perform the steps of: displaying a plurality of icons, wherein: the icons are associated with a plurality of objects;the icons are three-dimensional graphical models of the associated objects; andthe icons are arranged according to locations of the associated objects as deployed in a network;receiving a request to select a property of a particular object for display;displaying control panel associated with a particular icon that represents the particular object, wherein the control panel comprises a plurality of properties;in response to a selection of at least one of the plurality of properties, determining a value of the at least one selected property;generating a status indicator based at least in part on the determined value of the at least one selected property; anddisplaying the status indicator.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, further comprising: displaying lines between the icons, the lines representing network links;determining a status associated with a particular network link; andmodifying the displayed line associated with the particular network link, the modification based at least in part on the determined status.
  • 19. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein: the graphical user interface is further operative to display lines between the icons, the lines representing network links; andthe processor is further operative to: determine a status associated with a particular network link; andmodify the displayed line associated with the particular network link, the modification based at least in part on the determined status.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the icons are arranged on a three-dimensional graphical surface.
  • 21. The method of claim 1, wherein the status indicator is displayed relative to the particular icon that represents the particular object.
  • 22. The method of claim 2, wherein the translucent quality is such that a view of the displayed icons is not obstructed by the status indicator.
  • 23. The method of claim 8, wherein the icons are arranged on a three-dimensional graphical surface.
  • 24. The method of claim 8, wherein the status indicator is displayed relative to the particular icon that represents the particular object.
  • 25. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the icons are arranged on a three-dimensional graphical surface.
  • 26. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the icons are arranged on a three-dimensional graphical surface.
  • 27. The method of claim 1, wherein the control panel comprises: a respective textual description for each of the plurality of properties; anda respective color-coded indicator for each of the plurality of properties.
  • 28. The method of claim 1, wherein the status indicator represents: traffic load associated with the particular object; andunused capacity of the particular object.
  • 29. The method of claim 1, wherein the status indicator comprises a percentage scale that is displayed in conjunction with a bar that corresponds to a percentage load of the particular object.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Ser. Nos. 60/241,049 and 60/241,051 both filed Oct. 17, 2000. Further, this application is a Continuation-in-Part of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/949,101 entitled “Network Management System Using Virtual Reality Techniques to Display and Simulate Navigation to Network Computers” filed Sep. 7, 2001, which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/408,213 entitled “Network Management System Using Virtual Reality Techniques to Display and Simulate Navigation to Network Components” filed Sep. 27, 1999 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,289,380), which is a Continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/892,919 entitled “Network Management System Using Virtual Reality Techniques to Display and Simulate Navigation to Network Components” filed Jul. 15, 1997 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,958,012), which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Ser. No. 60/021,980 filed on Jul. 18, 1996. This application is further related to co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 09/558,897 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Predictively and Graphically Administering a Networked Computer System in a Time Dimension” filed Apr. 26, 2000, and U.S. application Ser. No. 09/559,237 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Maintaining Data Integrity Across Distributed Computer Systems” filed Apr. 26, 2000. Except for U.S. application Ser. Nos. 09/408,213 and 08/892,919 and U.S. Provisional Ser. No. 60/021,980, each of the previously mentioned applications is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The concurrently filed U.S. Non-Provisional Application entitled “Method and Apparatus for Displaying 3D State Indicators” is also incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (131)
Number Name Date Kind
2485343 Zuschlag Oct 1949 A
3599033 Stettiner et al. Aug 1971 A
4464543 Kline et al. Aug 1984 A
4626892 Nortrup et al. Dec 1986 A
4665494 Tanaka et al. May 1987 A
4881197 Fischer Nov 1989 A
4937037 Griffiths et al. Jun 1990 A
4965752 Keith Oct 1990 A
4977390 Saylor et al. Dec 1990 A
5233687 Henderson, Jr. et al. Aug 1993 A
5261044 Dev et al. Nov 1993 A
5271058 Andrews et al. Dec 1993 A
5271063 d'Alayer de Costemore d'Arc Dec 1993 A
5295244 Dev et al. Mar 1994 A
5303388 Kreitman et al. Apr 1994 A
5353399 Kuwamoto et al. Oct 1994 A
5367670 Ward et al. Nov 1994 A
5394522 Sanchez-Frank et al. Feb 1995 A
5408218 Svedberg et al. Apr 1995 A
5408603 Van de Lavoir et al. Apr 1995 A
5437009 Lane Jul 1995 A
5440688 Nishida Aug 1995 A
5444849 Farrand et al. Aug 1995 A
5471399 Tanaka et al. Nov 1995 A
5483631 Nagai et al. Jan 1996 A
5486457 Butler et al. Jan 1996 A
5495607 Pisello et al. Feb 1996 A
5500934 Austin et al. Mar 1996 A
5504921 Dev et al. Apr 1996 A
5509123 Dobbins et al. Apr 1996 A
5535403 Li et al. Jul 1996 A
5586254 Kondo et al. Dec 1996 A
5586255 Tanaka et al. Dec 1996 A
5631825 van Weele et al. May 1997 A
5634122 Loucks et al. May 1997 A
5650814 Florent et al. Jul 1997 A
5655081 Bonnell et al. Aug 1997 A
5666477 Maeda Sep 1997 A
5671381 Strasnick et al. Sep 1997 A
5682487 Thomson Oct 1997 A
5684967 McKenna et al. Nov 1997 A
5696486 Poliquin et al. Dec 1997 A
5696892 Redmann et al. Dec 1997 A
5699403 Ronnen Dec 1997 A
5745692 Lohmann, II et al. Apr 1998 A
5748098 Grace May 1998 A
5748884 Royce et al. May 1998 A
5751965 Mayo et al. May 1998 A
5761502 Jacobs Jun 1998 A
5768501 Lewis Jun 1998 A
5774669 George et al. Jun 1998 A
5787252 Schettler et al. Jul 1998 A
5793974 Messinger Aug 1998 A
5796951 Hamner et al. Aug 1998 A
5801707 Rolnik et al. Sep 1998 A
5802383 Li et al. Sep 1998 A
5805819 Chin et al. Sep 1998 A
5809265 Blair et al. Sep 1998 A
5812750 Dev et al. Sep 1998 A
5832503 Malik et al. Nov 1998 A
5857190 Brown Jan 1999 A
5867650 Osterman Feb 1999 A
5872911 Berg Feb 1999 A
5933601 Fanshier et al. Aug 1999 A
5941996 Smith et al. Aug 1999 A
5948060 Gregg et al. Sep 1999 A
5956028 Matsui et al. Sep 1999 A
5958012 Battat et al. Sep 1999 A
5963886 Candy et al. Oct 1999 A
5987376 Olson et al. Nov 1999 A
6000045 Lewis Dec 1999 A
6008820 Chauvin et al. Dec 1999 A
6011838 Cox Jan 2000 A
6012984 Roseman Jan 2000 A
6021262 Cote et al. Feb 2000 A
6029177 Sadiq et al. Feb 2000 A
6035324 Chang et al. Mar 2000 A
6049828 Dev et al. Apr 2000 A
6052722 Taghadoss Apr 2000 A
6057757 Arrowsmith et al. May 2000 A
6058494 Gold et al. May 2000 A
6061714 Housel, III et al. May 2000 A
6070184 Blount et al. May 2000 A
6073099 Sabourin et al. Jun 2000 A
6085256 Kitano et al. Jul 2000 A
6094195 Clark et al. Jul 2000 A
6108782 Fletcher et al. Aug 2000 A
6112015 Planas et al. Aug 2000 A
6125390 Touboul Sep 2000 A
6131118 Stupek, Jr. et al. Oct 2000 A
6141777 Cutrell et al. Oct 2000 A
6154212 Eick et al. Nov 2000 A
6154849 Xia Nov 2000 A
6161082 Goldberg et al. Dec 2000 A
6167448 Hemphill et al. Dec 2000 A
6185613 Lawson et al. Feb 2001 B1
6192365 Draper et al. Feb 2001 B1
6202085 Benson et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209033 Datta et al. Mar 2001 B1
6222547 Schwuttke et al. Apr 2001 B1
6237006 Weinberg et al. May 2001 B1
6260158 Purcell et al. Jul 2001 B1
6271845 Richardson Aug 2001 B1
6288650 Chavand Sep 2001 B2
6298378 Angal et al. Oct 2001 B1
6366284 McDonald Apr 2002 B1
6373505 Bellamy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6374293 Dev et al. Apr 2002 B1
6404444 Johnston et al. Jun 2002 B1
6421707 Miller et al. Jul 2002 B1
6456306 Chin et al. Sep 2002 B1
6496209 Horii Dec 2002 B2
6546425 Hanson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6577323 Jamieson et al. Jun 2003 B1
6587108 Guerlain et al. Jul 2003 B1
6603396 Lewis et al. Aug 2003 B2
6614433 Watts Sep 2003 B1
6639614 Kosslyn et al. Oct 2003 B1
6661434 MacPhail Dec 2003 B1
6704874 Porras et al. Mar 2004 B1
6707795 Noorhosseini et al. Mar 2004 B1
6711154 O'Neal Mar 2004 B1
6732170 Miyake et al. May 2004 B2
6738809 Brisebois et al. May 2004 B1
6744446 Bass et al. Jun 2004 B1
20010042118 Miyake et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010044840 Carleton Nov 2001 A1
20030046390 Ball et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030069952 Tams et al. Apr 2003 A1
20040210469 Jones et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050078692 Gregson Apr 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
0 936 597 Aug 1999 EP
WO 9527249 Oct 1995 WO
WO 9915950 Apr 1999 WO
Related Publications (2)
Number Date Country
20020138602 A1 Sep 2002 US
20070132760 A9 Jun 2007 US
Provisional Applications (3)
Number Date Country
60021980 Jul 1996 US
60241049 Oct 2000 US
60241051 Oct 2000 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 09408213 Sep 1999 US
Child 09949101 US
Parent 08892919 Jul 1997 US
Child 09408213 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09949101 Sep 2001 US
Child 09982270 US