Patent Application
20230341748
The present invention relates to imaging systems and in particular to imaging systems for cell cultures.
Cell culture incubators are used to grow and maintain cells from cell culture, which is the process by which cells are grown under controlled conditions. Cell culture vessels containing cells are stored within the incubator, which maintains conditions such as temperature and gas mixture that are suitable for cell growth. Cell imagers take images of individual or groups of cells for cell analysis.
Cell culture is a useful technique in both research and clinical contexts. However, maintenance of cell cultures, for example, long term cultures, tissue preparations, in vitro fertilization preparations, etc., in presently available cell incubators is a laborious process requiring highly trained personnel and stringent aseptic conditions.
While scientists use microscopes to observe cells during culturing and may also attach a camera to the microscope to image cells in a cell culture, such imaging systems have many disadvantages.
The object of the present invention is to provide an improved imaging system and method for displaying cells in a cell culture. An imaging system and method of this type is described in U.S. application Ser. No. 15/563,375 filed on Mar. 31, 2016 and the disclosure of which in its entirety is hereby incorporated by reference.
In some embodiments, the imaging system and method described herein can be used as a stand-alone imaging system or it can be integrated in a cell incubator using a transport described in the aforementioned application incorporated by reference. In some embodiments, the imaging system and method is integrated in a cell incubator and includes a transport.
In some embodiments the system and method acquire data and images at the times a cell culturist typically examines cells. The method and system provide objective data, images, guidance and documentation that improves cell culture process monitoring and decision-making.
The system and method in some embodiments enable sharing of best practices across labs, assured repeatability of process across operators and sites, traceability of process and quality control. In some embodiments the method and system provide quantitative measures of cell doubling rates, documentation and recording of cell morphology, distribution and heterogeneity.
In some embodiments, the method and system provide assurance that cell lines are treated consistently and that conditions and outcomes are tracked. In some embodiments the method and system learn through observation and records how different cells grow under controlled conditions in an onboard database. Leveraging this database of observations, researchers are able to profile cell growth, test predictions and hypotheses concerning cell conditions, media and other factors affecting cell metabolism, and determine whether cells are behaving consistently and/or changing.
In some embodiments the method and system enable routine and accurate confluence measurements and imaging and enables biologists to quantify responses to stimulus or intervention, such as the administration of a therapeutic to a cell line.
The method and system capture the entire well area with higher coverage than conventional images and enables the highest level of statistical rigor for quantifying cell status and distribution.
In some embodiments, the method and system provide image processing and algorithms that will deliver an integration of individual and group morphologies with process-flow information and biological outcomes. Full well imaging allows the analysis and modeling of features of groups of cells—conducive to modeling organizational structures in biological development. These capabilities can be used for prediction of the organizational tendency of culture in advance of functional testing.
In some embodiments, algorithms are used to separate organizational patterns between samples using frequency of local slope field inversions. Using some algorithms, the method and system can statistically distinguish key observed differences between iP-MSCs generated from different TCP conditions. Biologically, this work could validate serum-free differentiation methods for iPSC MSC differentiation. Computationally, the method and system can inform image-processing of MSCs in ways that less neatly “clustered” image sets are not as qualified to do.
Even if all iP-MSC conditions have a sub-population of cells that meets ISCT 7-marker criteria, the “true MSC” sub-populations may occupy a different proportion under different conditions or fate differences could be implied by tissue “meso-structures”. By starting with a rich pallet of MSC outcomes, and grounding them in comparative biological truth, the method and system can refine characterization perspectives around this complex cell type and improve MSC bioprocess.
In certain embodiments, an imager includes one or more lenses, fibers, cameras (e.g., a charge-coupled device camera), apertures, mirrors, light sources (e.g., a laser or lamp), or other optical elements. An imager may be a microscope. In some embodiments, the imager is a bright-field microscope. In other embodiments, the imager is a holographic imager or microscope. In other embodiments the imager is a phase-contrast microscope. In other embodiments, the imager is a fluorescence imager or microscope.
As used herein, the fluorescence imager is an imager which is able to detect light emitted from fluorescent markers present either within or on the surface of cells or other biological entities, said markers emitting light in a specific wavelength when absorbing a light of different specific excitation wavelength.
As used herein, a “bright-field microscope” is an imager that illuminates a sample and produces an image based on the light absorbed by the sample. Any appropriate bright-field microscope may be used in combination with an incubator provided herein.
As used herein, a “phase-contrast microscope” is an imager that converts phase shifts in light passing through a transparent specimen to brightness changes in the image. Phase shifts themselves are invisible but become visible when shown as brightness variations. Any appropriate phase-contrast microscope may be used in combination with an incubator provided herein.
As used herein, a “holographic imager” is an imager that provides information about an object (e.g., sample) by measuring both intensity and phase information of electromagnetic radiation (e.g., a wave front). For example, a holographic microscope measures both the light transmitted after passing through a sample as well as the interference pattern (e.g., phase information) obtained by combining the beam of light transmitted through the sample with a reference beam.
A holographic imager may also be a device that records, via one or more radiation detectors, the pattern of electromagnetic radiation, from a substantially coherent source, diffracted or scattered directly by the objects to be imaged, without interfering with a separate reference beam and with or without any refractive or reflective optical elements between the substantially coherent source and the radiation detector(s).
In some embodiments, holographic microscopy is used to obtain images (e.g., a collection of three-dimensional microscopic images) of cells for analysis (e.g., cell counting) during culture (e.g., long-term culture) in an incubator (e.g., within an internal chamber of an incubator as described herein). In some embodiments, a holographic image is created by using a light field, from a light source scattered off objects, which is recorded and reconstructed. In some embodiments, the reconstructed image can be analyzed for a myriad of features relating to the objects. In some embodiments, methods provided herein involve holographic interferometric metrology techniques that allow for non-invasive, marker-free, quick, full-field analysis of cells, generating a high resolution, multi-focus, three-dimensional representation of living cells in real time.
In some embodiments, holography involves shining a coherent light beam through a beam splitter, which divides the light into two equal beams: a reference beam and an illumination beam. In some embodiments, the reference beam, often with the use of a mirror, is redirected to shine directly into the recording device without contacting the object to be viewed. In some embodiments, the illumination beam is also directed, using mirrors, so that it illuminates the object, causing the light to scatter. In some embodiments, some of the scattered light is then reflected onto the recording device. In some embodiments, a laser is generally used as the light source because it has a fixed wavelength and can be precisely controlled. In some embodiments, to obtain clear images, holographic microscopy is often conducted in the dark or in low light of a different wavelength than that of the laser in order to prevent any interference. In some embodiments, the two beams reach the recording device, where they intersect and interfere with one another. In some embodiments, the interference pattern is recorded and is later used to reconstruct the original image. In some embodiments, the resulting image can be examined from a range of different angles, as if it was still present, allowing for greater analysis and information attainment.
In some embodiments, digital holographic microscopy is used in incubators described herein. In some embodiments, digital holographic microscopy light wave front information from an object is digitally recorded as a hologram, which is then analyzed by a computer with a numerical reconstruction algorithm. In some embodiments, the computer algorithm replaces an image forming lens of traditional microscopy. The object wave front is created by the object's illumination by the object beam. In some embodiments, a microscope objective collects the object wave front, where the two wave fronts interfere with one another, creating the hologram. Then, the digitally recorded hologram is transferred via an interface (e.g., IEEE1394, Ethernet, serial) to a PC-based numerical reconstruction algorithm, which results in a viewable image of the object in any plane.
In some embodiments, in order to procure digital holographic microscopic images, specific materials are utilized. In some embodiments, an illumination source, generally a laser, is used as described herein. In some embodiments, a Michelson interferometer is used for reflective objects. In some embodiments, a Mach-Zehnder interferometer for transmissive objects is used. In some embodiments, interferometers can include different apertures, attenuators, and polarization optics in order to control the reference and object intensity ratio. In some embodiments, an image is then captured by a digital camera, which digitizes the holographic interference pattern. In some embodiments, pixel size is an important parameter to manage because pixel size influences image resolution. In some embodiments, an interference pattern is digitized by a camera and then sent to a computer as a two-dimensional array of integers with 8-bit or higher grayscale resolution. In some embodiments, a computer's reconstruction algorithm then computes the holographic images, in addition to pre- and post-processing of the images.
In some embodiments, in addition to the bright field image generated, a phase shift image results. Phase shift images, which are topographical images of an object, include information about optical distances. In some embodiments, the phase shift image provides information about transparent objects, such as living biological cells, without distorting the bright field image. In some embodiments, digital holographic microscopy allows for both bright field and phase contrast images to be generated without distortion. Also, both visualization and quantification of transparent objects without labeling is possible with digital holographic microscopy. In some embodiments, the phase shift images from digital holographic microscopy can be segmented and analyzed by image analysis software using mathematical morphology, whereas traditional phase contrast or bright field images of living unstained biological cells often cannot be effectively analyzed by image analysis software.
In some embodiments, a hologram includes all of the information pertinent to calculating a complete image stack. In some embodiments, since the object wave front is recorded from a variety of angles, the optical characteristics of the object can be characterized, and tomography images of the object can be rendered. From the complete image stack, a passive autofocus method can be used to select the focal plane, allowing for the rapid scanning and imaging of surfaces without any vertical mechanical movement. Furthermore, a completely focused image of the object can be created by stitching the sub-images together from different focal planes. In some embodiments, a digital reconstruction algorithm corrects any optical aberrations that may appear in traditional microscopy due to image-forming lenses. In some embodiments, digital holographic microscopy advantageously does not require a complex set of lenses; but rather, only inexpensive optics, and semiconductor components are used in order to obtain a well-focused image, making it relatively lower cost than traditional microscopy tools.
In some embodiments, holographic microscopy can be used to analyze multiple parameters simultaneously in cells, particularly living cells. In some embodiments, holographic microscopy can be used to analyze living cells, (e.g., responses to stimulated morphological changes associated with drug, electrical, or thermal stimulation), to sort cells, and to monitor cell health. In some embodiments, digital holographic microscopy counts cells and measures cell viability directly from cell culture plates without cell labeling. In other embodiments, the imager can be used to examine apoptosis in different cell types, as the refractive index changes associated with the apoptotic process can be quantified via digital holographic microscopy. In some embodiments, digital holographic microscopy is used in research regarding the cell cycle and phase changes. In some embodiments, dry cell mass (which can correlate with the phase shift induced by cells), in addition to other non-limiting measured parameters (e.g., cell volume, and the refractive index), can be used to provide more information about the cell cycle at key points.
In some embodiments, the method is also used to examine the morphology of different cells without labeling or staining. In some embodiments, digital holographic microscopy can be used to examine the cell differentiation process; providing information to distinguish between various types of stem cells due to their differing morphological characteristics. In some embodiments, because digital holographic microscopy does not require labeling, different processes in real time can be examined (e.g., changes in nerve cells due to cellular imbalances). In some embodiments, cell volume and concentration may be quantified, for example, through the use of digital holographic microscopy's absorption and phase shift images. In some embodiments, phase shift images may be used to provide an unstained cell count. In some embodiments, cells in suspension may be counted, monitored, and analyzed using holographic microscopy.
In some embodiments, the time interval between image acquisitions is influenced by the performance of the image recording sensor. In some embodiments, digital holographic microscopy is used in time-lapse analyses of living cells. For example, the analysis of shape variations between cells in suspension can be monitored using digital holographic images to compensate for defocus effects resulting from movement in suspension. In some embodiments, obtaining images directly before and after contact with a surface allows for a clear visual of cell shape. In some embodiments, a cell's thickness before and after an event can be determined through several calculations involving the phase contrast images and the cell's integral refractive index. Phase contrast relies on different parts of the image having different refractive index, causing the light to traverse different areas of the sample with different delays. In some embodiments, such as phase contrast microscopy, the out of phase component of the light effectively darkens and brightens particular areas and increases the contrast of the cell with respect to the background. In some embodiments, cell division and migration are examined through time-lapse images from digital holographic microscopy. In some embodiments, cell death or apoptosis may be examined through still or time-lapse images from digital holographic microscopy.
In some embodiments, digital holographic microscopy can be used for tomography, including but not limited to, the study of subcellular motion, including in living tissues, without labeling.
In some embodiments, digital holographic microscopy does not involve labeling and allows researchers to attain rapid phase shift images, allowing researchers to study the minute and transient properties of cells, especially with respect to cell cycle changes and the effects of pharmacological agents.
When the user moves from image to image in the z stack, there will not be smooth transition between images due to the z-offset between images along the z-axis. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, further image processing is performed on each of the images in the z-stack for a particular location of a well to produce a smooth transition.
These and other features and advantages, which characterize the present non-limiting embodiments, will be apparent from a reading of the following detailed description and a review of the associated drawings. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are explanatory only and are not restrictive of the non-limiting embodiments as claimed.
Referring now to
At the front wall 11c of the system 10, is a door 12 that is hinged to the wall 11c and which opens a hole H through which the sliding platform 13 exits to receive a plate and closes hole H when the platform 13 is retracted into the system 10.
The system 10 can also be connected to a computer or tablet for data input and output and for the control of the system. The connection is by way of an ethernet connector 15 in the rear wall 11e of the system as shown in
As used herein, an “imager” refers to an imaging device for measuring light (e.g., transmitted or scattered light), color, morphology, or other detectable parameters such as a number of elements or a combination thereof. An imager may also be referred to as an imaging device. In certain embodiments, an imager includes one or more lenses, fibers, cameras (e.g., a charge-coupled device or CMOS camera), apertures, mirrors, light sources (e.g., a laser or lamp), or other optical elements. An imager may be a microscope. In some embodiments, the imager is a bright-field microscope. In other embodiments, the imager is a holographic imager or microscope. In other embodiments, the imager is a fluorescence microscope.
As used herein, a “fluorescence microscope” refers to an imaging device which is able to detect light emitted from fluorescent markers present either within and/or on the surface of cells or other biological entities, said markers emitting light at a specific wavelength in response to the absorption a light of a different wavelength.
As used herein, a “bright-field microscope” is an imager that illuminates a sample and produces an image based on the light absorbed by the sample. Any appropriate bright-field microscope may be used in combination with an incubator provided herein.
As used herein, a “holographic imager” is an imager that provides information about an object (e.g., sample) by measuring both intensity and phase information of electromagnetic radiation (e.g., a wave front). For example, a holographic microscope measures both the light transmitted after passing through a sample as well as the interference pattern (e.g., phase information) obtained by combining the beam of light transmitted through the sample with a reference beam.
A holographic imager may also be a device that records, via one or more radiation detectors, the pattern of electromagnetic radiation, from a substantially coherent source, diffracted or scattered directly by the objects to be imaged, without interfering with a separate reference beam and with or without any refractive or reflective optical elements between the substantially coherent source and the radiation detector(s).
In some embodiments, an incubator cabinet includes a single imager. In some embodiments, an incubator cabinet includes two imagers. In some embodiments, the two imagers are the same type of imager (e.g., two holographic imagers or two bright-field microscopes). In some embodiments, the first imager is a bright-field microscope and the second imager is a holographic imager. In some embodiments, an incubator cabinet comprises more than 2 imagers. In some embodiments, cell culture incubators comprise three imagers. In some embodiments, cell culture incubators having 3 imagers comprise a holographic microscope, a bright-field microscope, and a fluorescence microscope.
As used herein, an “imaging location” is the location where an imager images one or more cells. For example, an imaging location may be disposed above a light source and/or in vertical alignment with one or more optical elements (e.g., lens, apertures, mirrors, objectives, and light collectors).
Referring to
The circuitry also includes a temperature controller 28 for maintaining the temperature at 98.6 degrees F. The processor 24 is connected to an I/O 27 that permits the system to be controlled by an external computer such as a laptop or desktop computer or a tablet such as an iPad or Android tablet. The connection to an external computer allows the display of the device to act as a user interface and for image processing to take place using a more powerful processor and for image storage to be done on a drive having more capacity. Alternatively, the system can include a display 29 such as a tablet mounted on one face of the system and an image processor 22 and the RAM 25 can be increased to permit the system to operate as a self-contained unit.
The image processing either on board or external, has algorithms for artificial intelligence and intelligent image analysis. The image processing permits trend analysis and forecasting, documentation and reporting, live/dead cell counts, confluence percentage and growth rates, cell distribution and morphology changes, and the percentage of differentiation.
When a new cell culture plate is imaged for the first time by the microscope optics, a single z-stack, over a large focal range, of phase contrast images is acquired from the center of each well using the 4× camera. The z-height of the best focused image is determined using the focusing method, described below. The best focus z-height for each well in that specific cell culture plate is stored in the plate database in RAM 25 or in a remote computer. When a future image scan of that plate is done using either the 4× or 10× camera, in either brightfield or phase contrast imaging mode, the z-stack of images collected for each well are centered at the best focus z-height stored in the plate database. When a future image scan of that plate is done using the 20× camera, a pre-scan of the center of each well using the 10× camera is performed and the best focus z-height is stored in the plate database to define the center of the z-stack for the 20× camera image acquisition.
Each whole well image is the result of the stitching together of a number of tiles. The number of tiles needed depend on the size of the well and the magnification of the camera objective. A single well in a 6-well plate is the stitched result of 35 tiles from the 4× camera, 234 tiles from the 10× camera, or 875 tiles from the 20× camera.
The higher magnification objective cameras have smaller optical depth, that is, the z-height range in which an object is in focus. To achieve good focus at higher magnification, a smaller z-offset needs to be used. As the magnification increases, the number of z-stack images needs to increase or the working focal range needs to decrease. If the number of z-stack images increase, more resources are required to acquire the image, time, memory, processing power. If the focal range decreases, the likelihood that the cell images will be out of focus is greater, due to instrument calibration accuracy, cell culture plate variation, well coatings, etc.
In one implementation, the starting z-height value is determined by a database value assigned stored remotely or in local RAM. The z-height is a function of the cell culture plate type and manufacturer and is the same for all instruments and all wells. Any variation in the instruments, well plates, or coatings needs to be accommodated by a large number of z-stacks to ensure that the cells are in the range of focus adjustment. In practice this results in large imaging times and is intolerance to variation, especially for higher magnification objective cameras with smaller depth of field. For example, the 4× objective camera takes 5 z-stack images with a z-offset of 50 μm for a focal range of 5*50=250 μm. The 10× objective camera takes 11 z-stack images with a z-offset of 20 μm for a focal range of 11*20=220 μm. The 20× objective camera takes 11 z-stack images with a z-offset of 10 μm for a focal range of 11*10=110 μm.
The processor 24 creates a new plate entry for each plate it scans. The user defines the plate type and manufacturer, the cell line, the well contents, and any additional experiment condition information. The user assigns a plate name and may choose to attach a barcode to the plate for easier future handling. When that plate is first scanned, a pre-scan is performed. For the pre-scan, the image processor 22 takes a z-stack of images of a single tile in the center of each well. The pre-scan uses the phase contrast imaging mode to find the best focus image z-height. The pre-scan takes a large z-stack range so it will find the focal height over a wider range of instrument, plate, and coating variation. The best focus z-height for each well is stored in the plate database such that future scans of that well will use that value as the center value for the z-height.
Although the pre-scan method was described using the center of a well as the portion where the optimal z-height is measured, it is understood that the method can be performed using other portions of the wells and that the portion measured can be different or the same for each well on a plate.
In one embodiment, the 4× pre-scan takes 11 z-height images with a z-offset of 50 μm for a focus range of 11*50=550 μm. For a 6-well plate, the 4× pre-scan takes 11 images per well, 6*11=66 images per plate. The 4× pre-scan best focus z-heights are used for the 4× and 10× scans. The additional imaging is not significant compared to the 35*5*6=1050 images for the 4× scan, and 234*11*6=15444 images for the 10× scan. For a 20× scan, the system performs a 10× pre-scan in addition to the 4× pre-scan to define the best focus z-height values to use as the 20× center z-height value for the z-stacks. It is advantageous to limit the number of pre-scan z-height measurements to avoid imaging the bottom plastic surface of the well since it may have debris that could confuse the algorithms.
As illustrated in
A big advantage of this pre-scan focus method is that it can focus on well bottoms without cells. For user projects like gene editing in which a small number of cells are seeded, this is huge. In the pre-scan focus method, a phase contrast pre-scan enables the z-height range to be set correctly for a brightfield image.
Practical implementation of 10× and 20× cameras is difficult due to the small depth of field and the subsequent limited range of focus for a reasonably sized z-stack. This pre-scan focus method enables the z-stack to be optimally centered around on the experimentally determined z-height, providing a better chance of the focal plane being in range.
Since the z-stacks are centered around the experimentally determined best focus height, the size of the z-stack can be reduced. The reduction in the total number of images reduces the scan time, storage, and processing resources of the system.
In some embodiments, the pre-scan is most effective when performed in a particular imaging mode, such as phase contrast. In such a circumstance, the optimal z-height determined using the pre-scan in that imaging mode can be applied to other imaging modes, such as brightfield, fluorescence, or luminescence.
In another embodiment, a method for segmentation of images of cell colonies in wells is described. A demonstration of the method is shown in
In accordance with the algorithm, the following steps are performed to perform the segmentation:
1. A remap of the raw input image is first calculated.
2. A threshold is calculated using Equation 1 below and the algorithm remap image is thresholded to produce a binary image. Such an image is shown in
3. Optionally finding the cell colony contours in the image, as shown in
Threshold=−0.22009×[Mean image gray level]−51.7875 Equation 1:
The slope and offset of Equation 1 were calculated using linear regression for a set of values, where the mean gray scale level of each sample image was plotted on the vertical axis and an empirically determined good threshold value for each sample image was plotted on the horizontal axis for a sample set of images that represented the variation of the population. The linear regression performed to set these values is shown in
The well metrics are accounted for in the algorithm as follows. Assume some finite-size region R⊂Z. For a random variable X taking on a finite amount of values, the max-entropy or Hartley entropy H0(X) represents the greatest amount of entropy possible for a distribution that takes on X's values. It equals the log of the size of X's support.
A scene S is a map chosen randomly according to some distribution over those of the form f: R→{1, . . . , N}. Here R represents pixel positions, S's range represents possible intensity values, and S's domain represents pixel coordinates.
A Shannon entropy metric for scenes can be defined as follows:
H(S):=−ΣP(S(r)=i)·log(P(S(r)=i)),i=1. r˜Uniform(R) (2)
In Equation 2, ˜ means ‘distributed like,’ and 0 log(0) is interpreted as 0. H(S) represents the expected amount of information conveyed by a randomly selected pixel in scene S. This can be seen as a heuristic for the amount of structure in a locale. Empirical estimation of H(S) from an observed image is challenging for various reasons. Among them:
If intensity of a pixel in S is distributed with non-eligible weight over a great many possible intensities, then the sum is very sensitive to small errors in estimation of the distribution;
Making the region R bigger to improve distribution estimation reduces the metric's localization and increases computational expense; and
Binning the intensities (reducing N) to reduce possible variation in distributions makes the sum less sensitive to estimation error, but also makes the metric less sensitive to the scene's structure.
Instead of estimating Shannon entropy, we estimate a closely related quantity. We choose a threshold t>0 and form a statistic M(S; t):
N1M(S;t):=Σ|{r:S(r)=i}|≥t i=1. (3)
where |·| is set size and 1P equals 1 if proposition P is true and 0 otherwise. Now log M(S; t) can be interpreted as an estimator for a particular max-entropy, as defined above, for a variable closely related to S(r) from Equation 2. In particular it is a biased-low estimator for the max-entropy of S(r) after conditioning away improbable intensities, threshold set by parameter t. Very roughly, Shannon entropy represents ‘how complex is a random pixel in S’?′ while log M(S;t) estimates ‘how much complexity is possible for a typical pixel in S?’. The described remap equals M(S; 1) and we can calculate a good threshold for M(S; 1) that is closely linearly correlated with stage confluence.
This algorithm is used to perform the pre-processing to create the colony segmentation that underlies the iPSC colony tracking that is preferably performed in phase contrast images. For cells that do not tend to cluster and/or are bigger another algorithm is used, as shown in
In accordance with the algorithm, the following steps are performed:
1. Given a stack of images, we calculate a new image that holds the variance (or range or standard deviation) of each pixel position for the whole stack. For example, if we have a stack of nine images, we would take the pixel gray scale values of the pixels at position (0, 0) for images 0-8, calculate their variance and store the result in position (0,0) for what we call the “variance image”. We then do that for pixel (0, 1), (0, 2), . . . , (m, n).
2. The pixels with the highest variance are the ones that have different values across the whole stack. We threshold the variance image, perform some segmentation, and that creates a mask of the pixels that are dark at the bottom of the stack, transparent in the middle, and bright at the top of the stack. These cells represent transparent objects in the images (cells). We call this the “cell mask.” The cell mask is shown as the contours in the
3. We next create an “average image” of all the image in the stack. Each pixel position of the average image holds the average of all the pixels for its corresponding position in the image stack.
4. Then, we calculate the median pixel color of all the pixels that are NOT on the mask for all and if a pixel in the average image is darker than a “darkness threshold” value or brighter than a “brightness threshold” value, it is changed to the median value. The average image, when it has been modified in this way is called the “synthetic background image”
5. We then calculate the grayscale histogram of the synthetic background image (shown as the curve 121 on the graph at the bottom left of
6. We then calculate the grayscale histogram of the pixels under the cell mask (shown as the histogram 122 on the graph at the bottom left of
When the shape of the histogram 122 is closest to the shape of the curve 121, that is the point when the cells have disappeared (they are transparent, so the best focus point is when they disappear). This is what we call “best focus”. The matching of the two histograms is signified by the height of line 123. When the best match occurs, the height of line 123 is at a maximum. The cells below the best focus are dark and the cells above the best focus are bright.
We can then use this knowledge to create hybrid images well suited for counting cells, evaluating morphology, etc. The graph on the bottom right of
One or more imaging systems may be interconnected by one or more networks in any suitable form, including as a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN) such as an enterprise network or the Internet. Such networks may be based on any suitable technology and may operate according to any suitable protocol and may include wireless networks, wired networks, or fiber optic networks.
In another embodiment, the cell culture images for a particular culture are associated with other files related to the cell culture. For example, many cell incubators and have bar codes adhered thereto to provide a unique identification alphanumeric for the incubator. Similarly, media containers such as reagent bottles include bar codes to identify the substance and preferably the lot number. The files of image data, preferably stored as raw image data, but which can also be in a compressed jpeg format, can be stored in a database in memory along with the media identification, the unique incubator identification, a user identification, pictures of the media or other supplies used in the culturing, notes taken during culturing in the form of text, jpeg or pdf file formats.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, further image processing is performed on each of the images in the z-stack for a particular location of a well to produce a smooth transition.
In order to give the appearance of a smooth transition, an OpenGL Texture function is applied to corresponding pixels in the stack. When the user moves from one image in the z-stack to another, there is a resulting appearance of a smooth transition. In addition, there is a graphical user interface program (GUI) interacting with a widget in the GUI which interacts with the OpenGL library. The result of this software is shown in the screen shot examples in
This widget provides the user with display controls 131 for focusing, 132 for zooming in and out and 133 for panning.
In an alternative embodiment, the user can control the display using mechanical controls such as shown in
In one embodiment, an app runs on a smartphone such as an IOS phone such as the iPhone 11 or an Android based phone such as the Samsung Galaxy S10 and is able to communicate with the imager by way of Bluetooth, Wi-Fi or other wireless protocols. The smartphone links to the imager and the bar code reader on the smartphone can read the bar code labels on the incubator, the media containers, the user id badge and other bar codes. The data from the bar codes is then stored in the database with the cell culture image files. In addition, the camera on the smartphone can be used to take pictures of the cell culture equipment and media and any events relative to the culturing to store with the cell culture image files. Notes can be taken on the smartphone and transferred to the imager either in text form or by way of scanning written notes into jpeg or pdf file formats.
The various methods or processes outlined herein may be coded as software that is executable on one or more processors that employ any one of a variety of operating systems or platforms. Such software may be written using any of a number of suitable programming languages and/or programming or scripting tools and may be compiled as executable machine language code or intermediate code that is executed on a framework or virtual machine.
One or more algorithms for controlling methods or processes provided herein may be embodied as a readable storage medium (or multiple readable media) (e.g., a non-volatile computer memory, one or more floppy discs, compact discs (CD), optical discs, digital versatile disks (DVD), magnetic tapes, flash memories, circuit configurations in Field Programmable Gate Arrays or other semiconductor devices, or other tangible storage medium) encoded with one or more programs that, when executed on one or more computing units or other processors, perform methods that implement the various methods or processes described herein.
In various embodiments, a computer readable storage medium may retain information for a sufficient time to provide computer-executable instructions in a non-transitory form. Such a computer readable storage medium or media can be transportable, such that the program or programs stored thereon can be loaded onto one or more different computing units or other processors to implement various aspects of the methods or processes described herein. As used herein, the term “computer-readable storage medium” encompasses only a computer-readable medium that can be considered to be a manufacture (e.g., article of manufacture) or a machine. Alternately or additionally, methods or processes described herein may be embodied as a computer readable medium other than a computer-readable storage medium, such as a propagating signal.
The terms “program” or “software” are used herein in a generic sense to refer to any type of code or set of executable instructions that can be employed to program a computing unit or other processor to implement various aspects of the methods or processes described herein. Additionally, it should be appreciated that according to one aspect of this embodiment, one or more programs that when executed perform a method or process described herein need not reside on a single computing unit or processor but may be distributed in a modular fashion amongst a number of different computing units or processors to implement various procedures or operations.
Executable instructions may be in many forms, such as program modules, executed by one or more computing units or other devices. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Typically, the functionality of the program modules may be organized as desired in various embodiments.
While several embodiments of the present invention have been described and illustrated herein, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily envision a variety of other means and/or structures for performing the functions and/or obtaining the results and/or one or more of the advantages described herein, and each of such variations and/or modifications is deemed to be within the scope of the present invention. More generally, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that all parameters, dimensions, materials, and configurations described herein are meant to be exemplary and that the actual parameters, dimensions, materials, and/or configurations will depend upon the specific application or applications for which the teachings of the present invention is/are used. Those skilled in the art will recognize or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described and claimed. The present invention is directed to each individual feature, system, article, material, and/or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more such features, systems, articles, materials, and/or methods, if such features, systems, articles, materials, and/or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is included within the scope of the present invention.
The indefinite articles “a” and “an,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, should be understood to mean “at least one.”
The phrase “and/or,” as used herein in the specification and in the claims, should be understood to mean “either or both” of the elements so conjoined, e.g., elements that are conjunctively present in some cases and disjunctively present in other cases. Other elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified by the “and/or” clause, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified unless clearly indicated to the contrary. Thus, as a non-limiting example, a reference to “A and/or B,” when used in conjunction with open-ended language such as “comprising” can refer, in one embodiment, to A without B (optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to B without A (optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to both A and B (optionally including other elements); etc.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, “or” should be understood to have the same meaning as “and/or” as defined above. For example, when separating items in a list, “or” or “and/or” shall be interpreted as being inclusive, e.g., the inclusion of at least one, but also including more than one, of a number or list of elements, and, optionally, additional unlisted items. Only terms clearly indicated to the contrary, such as “only one of” or “exactly one of,” or, when used in the claims, “consisting of,” will refer to the inclusion of exactly one element of a number or list of elements. In general, the term “or” as used herein shall only be interpreted as indicating exclusive alternatives (e.g. “one or the other but not both”) when preceded by terms of exclusivity, such as “either,” “one of,” “only one of,” or “exactly one of.” “Consisting essentially of,” when used in the claims, shall have its ordinary meaning as used in the field of patent law.
As used herein in the specification and in the claims, the phrase “at least one,” in reference to a list of one or more elements, should be understood to mean at least one element selected from any one or more of the elements in the list of elements, but not necessarily including at least one of each and every element specifically listed within the list of elements and not excluding any combinations of elements in the list of elements. This definition also allows that elements may optionally be present other than the elements specifically identified within the list of elements to which the phrase “at least one” refers, whether related or unrelated to those elements specifically identified. Thus, as a non-limiting example, “at least one of A and B” (or, equivalently, “at least one of A or B,” or, equivalently “at least one of A and/or B”) can refer, in one embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, with no B present (and optionally including elements other than B); in another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, B, with no A present (and optionally including elements other than A); in yet another embodiment, to at least one, optionally including more than one, A, and at least one, optionally including more than one, B (and optionally including other elements); etc.
In the claims, as well as in the specification above, all transitional phrases such as “comprising,” “including,” “carrying,” “having,” “containing,” “involving,” “holding,” and the like are to be understood to be open-ended, e.g., to mean including but not limited to.
Only the transitional phrases “consisting of” and “consisting essentially of” shall be closed or semi-closed transitional phrases, respectively, as set forth in the United States Patent Office Manual of Patent Examining Procedures, Section 2111.03.
Use of ordinal terms such as “first,” “second,” “third,” etc., in the claims to modify a claim element does not by itself connote any priority, precedence, or order of one claim element over another or the temporal order in which acts of a method are performed, but are used merely as labels to distinguish one claim element having a certain name from another element having a same name (but for use of the ordinal term) to distinguish the claim elements.
It should also be understood that, unless clearly indicated to the contrary, in any methods claimed herein that include more than one step or act, the order of the steps or acts of the method is not necessarily limited to the order in which the steps or acts of the method are recited.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2021/053500 | 10/5/2021 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63087527 | Oct 2020 | US |
