This application is a National Stage application of International Application No. PCT/US2012/062876, filed Oct. 31, 2012.
This invention relates generally to the application of particulate material along a tire footprint during tire testing operations.
Tires are often tested to determine any of a variety of characteristics. In particular instances, in lieu of testing tires on a vehicle, where conditions are difficult to control, tires are tested on a manufactured tire testing surface, such as the annular outer surface of a rotating road wheel, to better control the test conditions. Still, improvements to tire testing along manufactured tire testing surfaces remain necessary to better achieve more consistent or accurate results.
Manufactured tire testing surfaces may be employed by any of a variety of testing machines or systems. As such, tire testing surfaces may form generally flat or annular surfaces. For example, an annular tire operating surface may extend around a road wheel.
In operation, the tire is forcefully applied against, and rotates along the manufactured tire testing surface, such as the radially outer annular surface of the road wheel. In certain tests, particulate material comprising talc is applied to the tire and/or the manufactured tire testing surface for use along a tire footprint, the tire footprint comprising the area of contact between the tire and the wheel. In trying to better attain more consistent or accurate tire testing results, it has been found that the distribution of particulate material affects the tire testing results. Because the distribution of particulate material can impact tire testing results, and, in particular, the wear rate of the tire tread during such testing, there is a need to provide an improved distribution of particulate material along the road wheel.
The present invention comprises methods and apparatus for distributing particulate material along a tire testing surface. Particular methods of the present invention include a method for testing a tire on a wheel. Such methods include providing a tire testing surface and providing a tire having a radially outer annular side including a road-engaging surface. Such embodiments also include engaging forcefully a radially outer annular side of the tire with the tire testing surface to create a footprint constituting an area of contact between the tire and the tire testing surface, the footprint having a width extending in an axial direction of the tire. Furthermore, such methods include rotating the tire while engaged with the tire testing surface according to the prior step and discharging a particulate material from a particulate discharge outlet, the outlet having a length extending at least substantially across the width of the footprint.
Further embodiments of the invention comprise a tire testing device. Specific embodiments of the device comprise a tire testing surface and a tire retention member configured to rotatably retain a tire and arrange the tire in a tire testing surface-engaging position. Such devices further comprise a particulate discharging device having a particulate discharge outlet for discharging a flow of particulate material, the outlet having a length extending at least substantially across a width of a tire footprint, the footprint comprising an area of contact formed between a radially outer annular side of the tire and the tire testing surface when the tire is in the tire testing surface-engaging position.
The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more detailed descriptions of particular embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numbers represent like parts of the invention.
As suggested above, there is a need to provide improved distribution of particulate material, such as talc, along a tire footprint formed between a the tire and a manufactured tire testing surface during tire testing operations.
It has been found that the distribution of particulate material along a tire footprint during tire testing along a manufactured tire testing surface can negatively impact tire testing results. In particular, it has been found that the prior art methods and devices for distributing particulate material along a tire footprint formed on a road wheel results in a substantially uneven distribution of particulate. “Manufactured tire testing surface” and “tire testing surface,” as used synonymously herein unless otherwise noted, reference a tire operating surface that has been formed along or in association with a tire testing device, such as a tire testing machine, having a surface upon which a tire operates which is formed of any desired material, whether synthetic or natural, and which may form any desired surface upon which the tire is to be evaluated, such as a surface that forms or simulates a real-world tire operating surface. In an effort to provide more consistent and accurate test results, methods and apparatus for improving the distribution of particulate material along a tire footprint are discussed below.
In particular embodiments, a method of testing tires includes a step of providing a tire testing surface. It is understood that the tire testing surface may comprise any testing surface known to one of ordinary skill in the art, whether flat or contoured. For example, the tire testing surface may be arranged along a radially outer annular side of a road wheel, where the tire testing surface forms an annular surface. The radially outer annular side is located radially outward a rotational axis of the wheel along an outer extent of said wheel. The road wheel may comprise any wheel for use in tire testing, where the wheel is configured to rotate and the tire operating surface is configured to engage a tire during operation. It is understood that the tire testing surface may include any desired texture and may extend continuously or intermittently around the outer annular side of the wheel. For example, the wheel may have texture that promotes tire wear or that generates sufficient friction to create a slip angle within the tire footprint as the tire rotates side-to-side relative the tire operating surface to simulate the turning of a vehicle.
Particular embodiments of such methods further include a step of providing a tire having a radially outer annular side including a road-engaging surface, the tire being rotatably retained on a tire retention member. The tire provided may comprise any tire. For example, the tire may comprise a pneumatic tire or a non-pneumatic tire, whereby a solid band including a tread layer is arranged along a wheel or the like, such as is commonly used with skid steers. In many embodiments, the radially outer annular side of the tire includes a tread, the tread forming the road-engaging surface upon which the tire rotates and engages the wheel. The tire includes a rotational axis extending in an axial direction of the tire. It is understood that the tire may be rotatably retained on a retention member to facilitate rotation of the tire along the tire testing surface. It is understood that the retention member may comprise any member or device configured to rotatable retain a tire that is known to one of ordinary skill in the art. For example, the retention member may be an axle or spindle.
Particular embodiments of such methods further include a step of engaging forcefully the radially outer annular side of the tire with the tire testing surface to create a footprint constituting an area of contact between the tire and the tire testing surface, the footprint having a width extending in an axial direction of the tire. The step of engaging may comprise translating either or both of the tire and the tire testing surface towards the other to generate engagement between the tire and the wheel. The translation may be performed by any known method or device. Upon engagement, an area of contact between the tire and the tire testing surface is generated, which is referred to as a tire footprint. It is understood that the tire may engage the tire testing surface in any desired arrangement. For example, when the tire testing surface is arranged along a road wheel, the axes of rotation of each the tire and wheel may be parallel or biased from a parallel arrangement.
Particular embodiments of such methods further include a step of rotating the tire while engaged with the tire testing surface according to the prior step. Once the tire and tire testing surface are engaged, the tire rotates along the surface. In particular embodiments, the tire testing operation also rotates, such as when the tire testing surface is arranged along a road wheel. In any event, rotation is facilitated by any known method or device. For example, the tire and/or wheel may be driven to accomplish the step of rotating. In doing so, a drive source is arranged in operable communication with tire and/or the wheel. The drive source may comprise any drive source known to one of ordinary skill in the art, and may comprise, for example, a motor. It is also understood that rotating the tire may be achieved by rotation of the tire testing surface, and vice versa.
Particular embodiments of such methods further include a step of discharging a particulate material from an forming a particulate discharge outlet of a particulate discharging device across a full width of the footprint. In an effort to improve the distribution of particulate material across the footprint of a tire operating along a tire testing surface, a particulate material is discharged from an forming a particulate discharge outlet of a particulate discharging device, the outlet comprising one or more apertures. In such embodiments, the outlet forms a particulate discharge outlet of a particulate-receiving chamber arranged within the particulate discharging device. The particulate-receiving chamber receives the particulate from a particulate inlet prior to the step of discharging a particulate. It is understood that the particulate may comprise any desired particulate material, including talc. The particulate may be supplied in any desired form. For example, in particular embodiments, the particulate comprises a gas-particulate mixture. The gas-particulate mixture may be formed by employing any known method or device, such as by using a venturi mixer. It is further understood that the mixture may be formed from any desired particulate, such as talc, and any desired gas, including a gas mixture such as atmospheric air. Furthermore, it is understood that the particulate discharging device may comprise a single aperture, and the particulate discharging device may comprise an air knife or any other similar device.
In the embodiments previously discussed, the particulate discharge outlet discharges a particulate material across a full width of the footprint. In doing so, the particulate discharge outlet may have a length that is at least equal to the full width of the footprint, although it is understood that the particulate discharge outlet may have a length extending less the entire full width of the footprint even thought the outlet still discharges the particulate material across the full width of the footprint. Accordingly, the particulate discharge outlet may be configured to discharge particulate material across a full width of the footprint whether or not the outlet has a length extending greater than or equal to the full width of the footprint or less than the full width of the footprint. For example, the discharge path of the particulate material may be angular, meaning the path may extend further outward along a lengthwise direction of the particulate discharge outlet such that the discharge of particulate material extends in a lengthwise direction beyond the full length of the outlet. By further example, the particulate discharge outlet has a length extending at least substantially across the width of the footprint, where “substantially across the width of the footprint” means that while the particulate discharge outlet length may not extend fully across the entire width of the footprint, the particulate discharge outlet extends sufficiently across a majority of the footprint width to discharge the particulate material across the full width of the footprint. In other variations, the length of the particulate discharge outlet extends at least substantially across a full width of the tread, the width of the tread extending in the axial direction of the tire or, in other words, laterally between opposing sidewalls of the tire. It is understood that the particulate may be discharged from the particulate discharge outlet at any rate. In particular examples, particulate material is discharged from the particulate discharge outlet at a rate of 1 gram to 9 grams per minute or at a rate of at least 6 grams per minute.
It is appreciated that the particulate discharge outlet, as well as any one or more apertures forming the outlet, may comprise any desired shape. For example, the width of the particulate discharge outlet may remain constant along the length of the particulate discharge outlet, such as where the particulate discharge outlet is rectangular. In other variations, a width of the particulate discharge outlet varies along the length of the particulate discharge outlet, and may vary linearly or non-linearly, which includes a curvilinear variation. By example, the particulate discharge outlet may form an oval. By further example, the width of the particulate discharge outlet may taper along the length of the particulate discharge outlet, such as from a maximum width to a minimum width or vice versa. It is noted that the particulate discharge outlet width extends perpendicular to the particulate discharge outlet length, and in certain instances, the particulate discharge outlet width is less than the particulate discharge outlet length although it is appreciated that the width and length may be equal, such as when the particulate discharge outlet is circular or forms a regular quadrilateral (i.e., a square).
Particular embodiments of such methods include a step of injecting a burst of gas into a particulate-receiving chamber of the device to dislodge any particulate remaining within the discharging chamber after initiating the step of discharging a particulate material from a particulate discharge outlet. Once the step of discharging a particulate material from an particulate discharge outlet has initiated, a burst of gas may be injected into the particulate-receiving chamber of the device to remove any particulate remaining within at least a portion of the chamber. The burst of gas has sufficient velocity and volume to provide sufficient force to dislodge, eject, or expel any particulate that may have built-up or otherwise become retained or lodged within the chamber. For example, the burst of gas may endure for up to one second before terminating. Because the step of discharging a particulate material may continue or repeat, the step of injecting a burst of gas may be repeated periodically. While the step of injection is performed after a step of discharging a particulate has initiated, which provides the particulate retained within the chamber in need of removal, the step of injecting may be performed while the step of discharging endures (that is, were the step of injecting is performed concurrently with a step of discharging), or may occur after a step of discharging has terminated or been paused temporarily. It is understood that the supply of gas may comprise the same gas source that may be employed to supply a gas-particulate mixture, or any other gas source.
These methods for distributing particulate material into a tire footprint arranged along a tire testing surface may be achieved manually or automatically, in whole or in part. Exemplary embodiments of a tire testing device for use in performing such methods are discussed in further detail below. The device(s) shown in the figures only exemplify any of a variety of tire testing devices that may be employed within the scope of this invention.
With reference to
With continued reference to
The tire testing device 10 of
As shown in
The particulate discharging system 24 in
Device 26 generally comprises a housing formed of any desired material, such as aluminum or stainless steel. To reduce any unintentional retention of particulate within the device, the device or portions thereof, such as the particulate-receiving chamber, may be formed of, or coated with, a low-friction material or other material that reduces the ability of the particulate to adhere to the device. Additionally, or in the alternative, other features or methods may be employed to remove particulate that may accumulate within the device after gas-particulate mixture has been discharged from the device. For example, the device may be configured to inject a burst of gas into the discharging device to dislodge or remove any accumulated particulate. This may be achieved by utilizing the gas-particulate inlet 40 to provide the burst of gas, or one or more additional gas conduits may be operably attached to the discharging device 26. For example, with reference again to the embodiment of
With particular reference to
The particulate receiving chamber of the discharging device may comprise any shaped volume. For example, with reference to
It is further noted that the embodiment of
It is understood that the discharge device outlet may comprise any desired shape. For example, with reference to
In the prior art, with reference to
With reference to
While this invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments thereof, it shall be understood that such description is by way of illustration and not by way of limitation. Accordingly, the scope and content of the invention are to be defined by the terms of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/062876 | 10/31/2012 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/070177 | 5/8/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1669622 | Messer | May 1928 | A |
2010049 | Abbott, Jr. | Aug 1935 | A |
2098306 | Porter | Nov 1937 | A |
2598599 | Pleasance | May 1952 | A |
2766618 | Stiehler et al. | Oct 1956 | A |
3140887 | Wallace | Jul 1964 | A |
4174204 | Chase | Nov 1979 | A |
4476515 | Coffee | Oct 1984 | A |
4647471 | Jenkins | Mar 1987 | A |
4718759 | Butler | Jan 1988 | A |
4800688 | Suzuki | Jan 1989 | A |
4940503 | Lindgren et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5111687 | Hill | May 1992 | A |
5365702 | Shank, Jr. | Nov 1994 | A |
5504968 | Pressley | Apr 1996 | A |
5636681 | Sulzer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5687906 | Nakagawa | Nov 1997 | A |
5703284 | Gerhards et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5868326 | Speegle | Feb 1999 | A |
6021962 | Hedger | Feb 2000 | A |
6050876 | Ouyang et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6439041 | Stalnaker | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6502454 | MacIoce, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510733 | Coe et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6546791 | Yurjevich | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554210 | Holt et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
7036753 | Huffman | May 2006 | B2 |
7168307 | Jahn et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7169307 | Liu | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7240708 | Nomura et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254996 | Ouyang | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7396593 | Liu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
8123147 | Fulkerson et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8196462 | Stalnaker et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20020071957 | Squitieri | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030094120 | Golley et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040163455 | Deniau | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050208225 | Sakata | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070086861 | Pratt | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070240614 | Lynch | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080060574 | Bacchus et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090012763 | Langer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100258014 | Van Heijningen | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110000292 | Yoshikawa et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120186324 | Neugebauer et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2593751 | Aug 2006 | CA |
10141973 | Apr 2003 | DE |
161621 | Apr 1921 | GB |
326651 | Mar 1930 | GB |
2264503 | Sep 1993 | GB |
3044532 | Feb 1991 | JP |
04169673 | Jun 1992 | JP |
04181142 | Jun 1992 | JP |
04070288 | Nov 1992 | JP |
H04343794 | Nov 1992 | JP |
6129954 | May 1994 | JP |
3706637 | Sep 1994 | JP |
7020030 | Jan 1995 | JP |
H07020029 | Jan 1995 | JP |
H07146217 | Jun 1995 | JP |
H0850082 | Feb 1996 | JP |
H08178815 | Jul 1996 | JP |
H08233716 | Sep 1996 | JP |
11218470 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001242056 | Sep 2001 | JP |
3739029 | Jan 2006 | JP |
2006226695 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2007017423 | Jan 2007 | JP |
2008014667 | Jan 2008 | JP |
2008082709 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008134080 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2009122027 | Jun 2009 | JP |
04371940 | Nov 2009 | JP |
4496054 | Jul 2010 | JP |
4559617 | Oct 2010 | JP |
4609806 | Oct 2010 | JP |
4915139 | Apr 2012 | JP |
10-0642992 | Nov 2006 | KR |
10-0783660 | Dec 2007 | KR |
100783660 | Dec 2007 | KR |
0212880 | Feb 2002 | WO |
03014694 | Feb 2003 | WO |
2004046001 | Jun 2004 | WO |
2005116638 | Dec 2005 | WO |
2012003314 | Jan 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT/US2012/062876 nternational Search Report & Written Opinion, Jan. 23, 2013, 23 pages. |
Neithalath et al; Using the Tire-Pavement Test Apparatus to Investigate the Influence of Time Geometry; paper 6, vol. 1, No. 1, 18 pgs, obtained from “http://www.concretepavements.org/IJCP/Vol%201%20No%201/Neithalath%20paper%206%20volume%201%20number%201.pdf”. |
Emil Venere; Machine harnesses sound science to probe causes of road noise, Mar. 25, 2003, 5 pgs, obtained from http://www.purdue.edu/uns/html3month/030325.Bernhard.tiremach.html. |
Walraven, Perry; “Laboratory Tread Wear Simulation”; MTS Systems Corporation; 28 pages; presented at a meeting of the Rubber Division, American Chemical Society, Cleveland, Ohio, Oct. 17-20, 1995. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150292984 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |