1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to data and signal communication methods between surface and a downhole tool in a wellbore and more particularly to communication from the surface to a downhole tool by utilizing mudflow variations.
2. Description of the Related Art
Wellbores or boreholes are drilled in the earth formation for the production of hydrocarbons (oil and gas) utilizing a rig structure (land or offshore) and a drill string that includes a tubing (joined pipes or a coiled tubing) and a drilling assembly (also referred to as a bottom hole assembly or “BHA”). The drilling assembly carries a drill bit that is rotated by a motor at the surface and/or by a drilling motor or mud motor carried by the drilling assembly. The drilling assembly also carries a variety of downhole sensors usually referred to as the measurement-while-drilling (“MWD”) sensors or tools. Drilling fluid or mud is pumped by mud pumps at the surface into the drill string, which after discharging at the drill bit returns to the surface via an annulus between the drill string and the borehole walls. The downhole tools in the BHA perform a variety of functions including drilling the wellbore along a desired well path that may include vertical sections, straight inclined sections and curved sections. Signals are sent from the surface to the downhole tools to cause the downhole tools to operate in particular manners. Downhole tools also send data and signals to the surface relating to a variety of downhole conditions and formation parameters.
In one method, signals are sent as encoded signals from the surface to the downhole tools using the drilling fluid column in the wellbore as the transmission medium. Such signals are usually sent in the form of sequences of pressure pulses by a pulser at the surface or by changing the drilling fluid flow rate at the surface. The changes in the flow rate are sensed or measured at a suitable downhole location by one or more downhole detectors, such as flow meters and pressure sensors, and then deciphered or decoded by a downhole controller. Mud pulse telemetry schemes typically utilized tend to be complex and consume extensive amount of time to transmit signals. Also, majority of the current down linking methods where fluid flow is varied utilize rig site apparatus that requires relatively precise controls of the fluid flow variations and special downhole set ups to transmit complex data.
However, many of the wells or portions thereof can be drilled by utilizing a limited number of commands or signals sent from the surface to the downhole tools, including implementing automated drilling. Consequently, a simplified telemetry method and system can be used to transmit signals to the downhole tool. Thus, there is a need for an improved method and system for transmitting signals from the surface, detecting the transmitted signals downhole and utilizing the detected signals to effect various operations of the downhole tools during drilling of wellbores.
The present invention provides down linking methods and systems that utilize surface sent commands to operate or control downhole tools (such as a drilling assembly, steering mechanism, MWD sensors etc.). In one aspect, signals from the surface are sent by altering the fluid flow rate of the fluid flowing (circulating or pumped) in a wellbore. The signals may be sent utilizing fixed or dynamic time period schemes. Flow rate changes are detected downhole to determine the surface sent signals. In one aspect, the method determines the signals sent from the surface based on the number of times the flow rate crosses a threshold. In another aspect, the method also utilizes the time periods associated with the crossings to determine the signals. In one aspect, the end of a signal may be defined by a period of constant flow rate. In another aspect, each determined signal may correspond to a command that is stored in a memory downhole. The flow rate at the surface may be changed automatically by a controller that controls the mud pumps at the surface or by controlling a fluid flow control device. The flow rate changes downhole may be detected by any suitable detector, such as a flow meter, pressure sensor, etc.
In another aspect, the invention provides a tool that includes a flow measurement system that includes a flow measuring device, such as a pressure sensor or a flow meter, such as turbine driven alternator that generates a voltage signal corresponding to the measured flow rate. A controller in the downhole tool coupled to the flow meter determines the number of crossings of the fluid flow relative to a threshold and associated time periods and determines the nature of the signals sent from the surface. The downhole tool contains information in the form of a matrix or table which assigns each command to a function or operation to be performed by the downhole tool. The controller correlates the detected signals to their assigned commands and operate the tool in response to the commands.
In another aspect, a sample set of commands may be utilized to achieve drilling of a wellbore or a portion thereof. For directional drilling, as an example, target values may be set for parameters relating to azimuth, tangent and inclination. As an example, to lock an azimuth, direction may be adjusted to the desired direction from the surface. When the transmitted data from the downhole tool indicates the desired adjustment of the downhole tool, the direction may be locked by the surface command. This same procedure may be applied to set other parameters or aspects of the downhole tool, such as target inclination. Also, commands may be used to control the operation of a steering device downhole to drill various sections of a wellbore, including vertical, curved, straight tangent, and drop off sections. The command also may be used to operate other downhole tools and sensors.
Examples of the more important features of the invention have been summarized (albeit rather broadly) in order that the detailed description thereof that follows may be better understood and in order that the contributions they represent to the art may be appreciated. There are, of course, additional features of the invention that will be described hereinafter and which will form the subject of the claims appended hereto.
For detailed understanding of the present invention, reference should be made to the following detailed description of the embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing; wherein:
During drilling operations, a suitable drilling fluid 31 (also known as “mud”) from a mud pit (source) 32 is circulated under pressure through a channel in the drillstring 20 by one or more mud pumps 34. The drilling fluid 31 passes from the mud pumps 34 into the drillstring 20 via a desurger (not shown), fluid line 38 and Kelly joint 21. The drilling fluid 31 is discharged at the borehole bottom through an opening in the drill bit 50. The drilling fluid 31 then circulates uphole through the annular space 27 (annulus) between the drillstring 20 and the borehole 26 and returns to the mud pit 32 via a return line 35. The drilling fluid acts to lubricate the drill bit 50 and to carry borehole cuttings or chips to the surface.
A sensor or device S1, such as a flow meter, typically placed in the line 38 provides information about the fluid flow rate. A surface torque sensor S2 and a sensor S3 associated with the drillstring 20 respectively provide information about the torque and rotational speed of the drillstring. Additionally, a sensor (not shown) associated with line 29 is used to provide the hook load of the drillstring 20. The drill bit 50 may be rotated by rotating the drill pipe 22, or a downhole motor 55 (mud motor) disposed in the drilling assembly 90 or by both by rotating the drill pipe 22 and using the mud motor 55.
In the embodiment of
In one embodiment of the invention, a drilling sensor module 59 is placed near the drill bit 50. The drilling sensor module 59 contains sensors, circuitry and processing software and algorithms relating to the dynamic drilling parameters. Such parameters typically include bit bounce, stick-slip of the drilling assembly, backward rotation, torque, shocks, borehole and annulus pressure, acceleration measurements and other measurements of the drill bit condition.
A telemetry or communication tool 99 (or module) is provided near an upper end of the drilling assembly 90. The communication system 99, a power unit 78 and measurement while drilling (“MWD”) tools 79 are all connected in tandem with the drillstring 20. Flex subs, for example, are used for integrating the MWD tools 79 into the drilling assembly 90. The MWD and other sensors in the drilling assembly 90 make various measurements including pressure, temperature, drilling parameter measurements, resistivity, acoustic, nuclear magnetic resonance, drilling direction measurements, etc. while the borehole 26 is being drilled. The data or signals from the various sensors carried by the drilling assembly 90 are processed and the signals to be transmitted to the surface are provided to the downhole telemetry system or tool 99.
The telemetry tool 99 obtains the signals from the downhole sensors and transmits such signals to the surface. One or more sensors 43 at the surface receive the downhole sent signals and provide the received signals to a surface controller, processor or control unit 40 for further processing according to programmed instructions associated with the controller 40. The surface control unit 40 typically includes one or more computers or microprocessor-based processing units, memory for storing programs or models and data, a recorder for recording data, and other peripherals.
In one embodiment, the system 10 may be programmed to automatically control the pumps or any other suitable flow control device 39 to change the fluid flow rate at the surface or the driller may operate the mud pumps 34 to affect the desired fluid flow rate changes in the drilling fluid being pumped into the drill string. In this manner, encoded signals from the surface are sent downhole by altering the flow of the drilling fluid at the surface and by controlling the time periods associated with the changes in the flow rates. In one aspect, to change the fluid flow rate, the control unit 40 may be coupled to and controls the pumps 34. The control unit contains programmed instructions to operate and control the pumps 34 by setting the pump speed so that the fluid being pumped downhole will exhibit the flow characteristics according to a selected flow rate scheme, certain examples of which are shown and discussed in reference to
Still referring to
The downhole tool 90 also may include a steering control unit 142 that controls the steering device 146 that causes the drill bit 150 to drill the wellbore in the desired direction. In the example of
A pulse sequence followed by a constant flow for a selected time period (locking time TL; for example 30 seconds as shown in
In one aspect, the present invention utilizes a relatively small number of commands to affect certain drilling operations. For example, to drill a wellbore or a portion thereof a limited number of commands may be sufficient to affect closed loop drilling of the wellbore along a relatively complex well path by utilizing the apparatus and methods described herein. In one aspect, as an example, the commands to a steering device may be as follows: (1) Continue; (2) Ribs off (no force by the force application device); (3) Continue with reduced force; (4) Add or remove walk force—left; (5) Add or remove walk force—right (6) Kick off; (7) Hold inclination; and (8) Vertical drilling mode (100% drop force). Also, the commands may be utilized to operate other downhole tools and sensors. For example, a command may be used to measure a parameter of interest by a particular sensor or tool, activate or deactivate a sensor or tool; turn on or turn off a tool or a sensor; etc.
Graphs 410a-410i show pulse counts from one to seven. For example, in graph 410a, the flow rate measurement parameter, such as voltage, crosses the threshold (dotted line) once followed by the locking time T. The signal represented by one count followed by the locking time is designated as the “continue” command 491. In graph 410b, the flow rate measurement parameter crosses the threshold once preceded by a constant low flow rate for a period T. Similarly 410c-410i show 2-7 crossings respectively, each such sequence followed by the locking time T. This assignment of commands to the particular sequences is arbitrary. Any suitable command may be assigned to any given sequence. The number of pump actions or the actions taken by a flow control device for the flow rate changes at the surface for each of the command signals (491-498) of column 490 are listed in column 412. For example, for the command “continue” (491), the corresponding signal includes one crossing and a single flow change action. Commands 492-498 respectively show 2-7 surface flow change actions, each such action providing a measurable signal crossing downhole.
The graphs of column 420 show an alternative threshold counting scheme wherein the pump or the flow control device at the surface changes the flow once preceded by a predefined time interval that is a multiple of a fixed time T, except for the 410a pulse, where the time T is essentially zero. The graph 420b shows one crossing preceded by the time T, while graphs 420c-420h show a single crossing preceded by times of 2T, 3T, 4T, 5T, 6T and 7T respectively. As noted earlier, the pulse scheme of column 420 can be implemented by a single action of the pump or the flow control device at the surface, as shown in Column 422.
The graphs of column 430 show an example of a bit pattern scheme that is based on fixed time periods that may be utilized to implement the methods of present invention. The graphs 430a and 430b are similar in nature to graphs 410a and 410b. In graph 430a, the pulse crossing is shown followed by two time periods of constant flow rate, while the graph 430b shows a single low flow rate for one time period followed by a crossing. The pulse scheme shown in each of the graphs 430a and 430b utilizes one flow change action at the surface, as shown in column 432. However, graph 430c shows a flow rate change in a first time period providing a first upward crossing followed by three successive constant counts of time periods without a crossing, i.e., constant flow rate. The bit pattern for the flow rates shown in graph 430c may be designated as a bit sequence “1111,” wherein the first crossing is a designated as bit “1” and each time period subsequent to the upward crossing is designated as a separate bit “1.” Graph 430d shows a first crossing (bit “1”) similar to the crossing of graph 430c that is followed by a second crossing (designated as bit “0” as it is in the direction opposite from the first crossing) in the next fixed period and again followed by a third crossing (i.e. bit 1 as it is in the direction of the first crossing) in the following fixed time period. The third crossing is shown followed by a fixed time (bit “1”). Thus, the bit count for the pulse sequence of graph 430d is designated as “1011.” Similarly, graph 430g will yield a bit scheme of “1000”, wherein the first crossing is bit “1” followed by a second downward crossing and two successive fixed time periods of constant low flow rate, each corresponding to a bit “0.” Thus, the scheme shown in the graphs 430 provides bit schemes based on the number of crossings and the time periods of constant flow associated with the crossings. Such a scheme can be easily deciphered or decoded downhole. In the example of the pulse scheme of graph 430, the beginning of each count is shown preceded by a low flow rate. The corresponding number of surface actions for each of the signal is shown in column 432. For example, the signal of graph 430c corresponds to two actions, one for the low flow rate and one for the high flow rate, while the signal corresponding to graph 430e corresponds to five actions, one action for the low flow rate and a separate action for each of the four crossings.
The graphs of column 440 show a bit pattern that utilizes dynamic time periods instead of the fixed time periods shown in the graph of column 430. The number of surface actions that correspond with the flow rate changes are listed in column 442. The graphs 440a and 440b are the same as graphs 430a and 430b. Graph 440c-440h bit patterns where dynamic time periods are associated with the threshold crossings. In the examples of graphs 440c-440h, at each threshold crossing a time period stars. If there is no crossing, there is a maximum predefined time period, which then represents a bit, for example bit “0.” If there is a crossing within a defined time period, then that crossing may be represented by the other bit, which in this case will be bit “1.” Thus, the crossings and associated dynamic time periods may be used to define a suitable bit sequence or command.
The graphs of column 450 show a scheme wherein the number of crossings in a particular time slot defines the nature of the signal. For example, graph 450e shows two crossings in a first particular time slot while graph 450g shows two crossings in a second particular time slot. Graph 450h shows three crossings in the second particular time slot. By counting the crossing in particular time periods, it is feasible to assign such signals corresponding commands. The number of surface actions that correspond to the signals 450a-450h are listed in column 452. For example, the signal of graph 450d corresponds to two actions, one of the low constant rate and one for the higher rate, while the signal corresponding to graph 450h has four actions, one for the low flow rate and one for each of the three crossings. It will be noted that the above flow rate change schemes are a few examples and any other suitable scheme including any combination of the above described schemes may be utilized and further any bit scheme may be assigned to any flow rate pattern.
The system described above may utilize, but does not require, any by-pass actuation system for changing the fluid flow rate at the surface. Alternatively, mud pumps may be controlled to effect necessary flow rate changes that will provide the desired number of threshold crossings. The tool may also be programmed to receive downlink only a certain time after the fluid flow has been on. The programs are also relatively simple as the system may be programmed to look for a single threshold. Limited number of commands also aid in avoiding sending a large number of surface signals or commands through the mud.
It should be appreciated that the teachings of the present invention can be advantageously applied to steering systems without ribs. Moreover, as noted previously, the present teachings can be applied to any number of wellbore tools and sensors responsive to signals, including but not limited to, wellbore tractors, thrusters, downhole pressure management systems, MWD sensors, etc. In another aspect, the drill string rotation may be changed to send signals according to one of the schemes mentioned above. The threshold value can then be defined relative to the drill string rotation. Appropriate sensors are used to detect the corresponding threshold crossings.
Thus, as described above, the present invention in one aspect provides a method that includes: encoding a command for a downhole device into a fluid pumped into a wellbore by varying a flow rate relative to a preset threshold; determining number of times the fluid flow rate crosses a selected threshold using a downhole sensor in fluid communication with the pumped fluid; decoding the command based on the number of times the fluid flow rate crosses the selected threshold; and operating the downhole device according to the decoded command.
In another aspect, a method is provided that includes: sending signals from the surface to a downhole location as a function of changing flow rate of a fluid flowing into a wellbore; detecting changes in the flow rate at the downhole location and providing a signal corresponding to the detected changes in the flow rate; determining number of times the signal crosses a threshold; and determining the signals sent from the surface based on the number of times the signal crosses the threshold. In one aspect, a plurality of signals are sent, each signal corresponding to a single change in the fluid flow rate. In another aspect, the signals are sent by changing the fluid flow rate according to a bit pattern that utilizes fixed time periods. In another aspect, the signals are sent by changing the fluid flow rate according to a bit pattern that utilizes dynamic time periods, predetermined time slots, or unique number of crossings of the threshold.
In another aspect, the invention provides a system for drilling a wellbore that includes: a flow control unit at a surface location that sends data signals by changing fluid flow rate of a drilling fluid flowing into a drill string during drilling of the wellbore; a detector in the drill string that provides signals corresponding to the change in the fluid flow rate at a downhole location; and a controller that determines the data signals sent from the surface based on number of times the signal crosses a threshold. The system includes a processor or controller that controls a pump that provides fluid under pressure or a flow control device associated with a line that supplies the fluid to the drill string to change the fluid flow rate at the surface. A downhole controller determines the signals sent from the surface based on time periods associated with crossings of the fluid flow of a threshold. The time periods may be a fixed time periods, dynamic time periods or based on selected time slots. The downhole controller correlates the determined signals with commands stored in memory associated with the controller. The controller also controls a steering device or another downhole tool according to the commands during drilling of the wellbore. In one aspect, the commands include: a command for drilling a vertical section; drilling a build section; drilling a tangent section; drilling a drop section; measuring a parameter of interest; instructing a device to perform a function; turning on a device; and turning off a device.
The foregoing description is directed to particular embodiments of the present invention for the purpose of illustration and explanation. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that many modifications and changes to the embodiment set forth above are possible without departing from the scope and the spirit of the invention. It is intended that the following claims be interpreted to embrace all such modifications and changes.
This application takes priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/665,823, filed on Mar. 28, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2901685 | Alder | Aug 1959 | A |
2964116 | Peterson | Dec 1960 | A |
2973505 | Johannesen | Feb 1961 | A |
3065416 | Jeter | Nov 1962 | A |
3302457 | Mayes | Feb 1967 | A |
3309656 | Godbey | Mar 1967 | A |
3693428 | LePeuvedic et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3713089 | Clacomb | Jan 1973 | A |
3732728 | Fitzpatrick | May 1973 | A |
3736558 | Cubberly, Jr. | May 1973 | A |
3737843 | LePeuvedic et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3739331 | Godbey et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3764968 | Anderson | Oct 1973 | A |
3764969 | Cubberly, Jr. | Oct 1973 | A |
3764970 | Manning | Oct 1973 | A |
3770006 | Sexton et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3800277 | Patton et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3958217 | Spinnler | May 1976 | A |
3964556 | Gearhart et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3971926 | Gau et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3982224 | Patton | Sep 1976 | A |
4007805 | Reber | Feb 1977 | A |
RE29734 | Manning | Aug 1978 | E |
RE30055 | Claycomb | Jul 1979 | E |
4166979 | Waggener | Sep 1979 | A |
4351037 | Scherbatskoy | Sep 1982 | A |
4461359 | Jones, Jr. et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4462469 | Brown | Jul 1984 | A |
4499563 | Jurgens | Feb 1985 | A |
4515225 | Dailey | May 1985 | A |
4628495 | Peppers et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4630244 | Larronde | Dec 1986 | A |
4675852 | Russell et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
RE32463 | Westlake et al. | Jul 1987 | E |
4686658 | Davison | Aug 1987 | A |
4698794 | Kruger et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4703461 | Kotlyar | Oct 1987 | A |
4734892 | Kotlylar et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4771408 | Kotlyar | Sep 1988 | A |
4785300 | Chin et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4790393 | Larronde et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4796699 | Upchurch | Jan 1989 | A |
4847815 | Malone | Jul 1989 | A |
4914637 | Goodsman | Apr 1990 | A |
4915168 | Upchurch | Apr 1990 | A |
4953595 | Kotlyar | Sep 1990 | A |
4956823 | Russell et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4982811 | Hardee | Jan 1991 | A |
5034929 | Cobern et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5065825 | Bardin et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5079750 | Scherbatckoy | Jan 1992 | A |
5113379 | Scherbatskoy | May 1992 | A |
5115415 | Mumby et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119344 | Innes | Jun 1992 | A |
5182730 | Scherbatskoy | Jan 1993 | A |
5182731 | Hoelscher et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5189645 | Innes | Feb 1993 | A |
5215152 | Duckworth | Jun 1993 | A |
5249161 | Jones et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5318409 | London et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5357483 | Innes | Oct 1994 | A |
5375098 | Malone et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5691712 | Meek et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5740126 | Chin et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5787052 | Gardner et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5799733 | Ringgenberg et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812068 | Wisler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5834929 | Dietz | Nov 1998 | A |
5963138 | Gruenhagen | Oct 1999 | A |
6089332 | Barr et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6105690 | Biglin, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6219301 | Moriarty | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6289998 | Krueger et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6714138 | Turner et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7222681 | Jones et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
20030016164 | Finke et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20050056465 | Virally et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050209782 | Moriarty | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2096372 | Oct 1982 | GB |
2156405 | Oct 1985 | GB |
WO2004062081 | Jul 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060225920 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60665823 | Mar 2005 | US |