The present invention relates generally to hard disk drives.
Hard disk drives (HDD), particularly those that are used in mobile computers, have to be designed to withstand the rough usage typically seen in the mobile environment. The shock robustness of such drives has improved primarily in the ability to withstand large shocks during the nonoperating mode. Typically, when not operating the slider assembly, which includes the read and write elements of the HDD, is “unloaded” by moving the slider onto a ramp near the outer diameter of the disk. In this way, in the event of shock the slider does not contact the disk, which could otherwise damage the slider and/or disk.
Before the drive is assembled, a slider orientation parameter referred to as “roll static attitude” (RSA) is set to zero on average, while a parameter referred to as “pitch static attitude” (PSA) is set slightly above zero on average (typically 50–100 min). What this means is that the slider has a slight pitch relative to the load beam of the suspension (non-zero PSA), i.e., the leading edge of the slider is slightly closer to the disk than the trailing edge, whereas in the orthogonal dimension of roll the slider is parallel to the suspension (zero RSA, i.e., the radially outer edge of the slider is the same height as the radially inner edge).
One role of the PSA value is to impart a rotating moment force to the slider through the suspension stiffness. Therefore, by changing the PSA, the balance of forces is modified, and the slider will adjust its fly height to recover an equilibrium of forces. On current designs, increasing the PSA results in higher force acting on the trailing edge of the slider, causing the slider to fly closer to the disk.
The present invention makes the observation that PSA-induced torque is part of the balance of forces that determines the fly height of the slider. Specifically, a higher PSA pushes the trailing edge of the slider closer to the disk and decreases fly height, potentially to the point of the slider undesirably touching the disk. However, the present invention recognizes that a higher PSA is good for loading, because when the slider is loaded from the ramp to the disk, it can happen that the slider might touch the disk, and that if it touches at the leading edge the slider undesirably can pitch forward. With respect to the unloading process, the present invention understands that the force that is required to move (“snap”) the slider away from the disk, if high, can cause the slider to undesirably vibrate and potentially damage the disk during unloading.
As further recognized herein, it is also desirable to avoid the drawback of making it harder to “snap” the slider onto the disk, i.e., to quickly establish the desired close spacing between the slider and disk. Such a circumstance otherwise could lead to undesirable bi-stable fly height, wherein the slider, which ordinarily flies at, e.g., fifteen nanometers from the disk once the air bearing is established between the slider and disk, must fly above the disk at a much higher height (e.g., a micrometer) until such time as the air bearing is established, complicating slider position control. It is further observed that the PSA requirements for optimized loading are usually contrary to those required for unloading. Optimizing flying conditions can yield yet a different target PSA value. Recognizing this problem, the present invention is provided.
A hard disk drive includes at least one rotatable disk and a slider juxtaposed with the disk. A suspension holds the slider. A pitch static attitude (PSA) bias mechanism is coupled to the suspension to establish a PSA of the slider.
A non-limiting PSA bias mechanism may include a piezoelectric structure bonded to the suspension. The PSA can be established by actuating the PSA bias mechanism to bend a flexure of the suspension to cause a trailing edge of the slider to be closer relative to the disk than a leading edge of the slider.
In some embodiments, a HDD controller can actuate the PSA bias mechanism to establish a relatively small positive PSA during read and write operations and a relatively large positive PSA during load and unload. The large PSA during loading reduces the risk of the leading edge touching the disk first and pitching the slider forward, while the large PSA during unloading reduces the force needed to “snap” the slider away from the disk and, hence, reduces the risk of vibrating the slider and potentially damaging the disk.
Furthermore, the HDD controller, if desired, can dynamically establish the PSA during operation based on HDD pressure and/or slider fly height and/or slider radial position.
In another aspect, a hard disk drive (HDD) includes a slider, a pitch static attitude (PSA) bias mechanism coupled to the slider to turn the slider, and a controller actuating the PSA bias mechanism to establish a first PSA during a first condition and a second PSA during a second condition, with the second PSA being different from the first PSA.
In still another aspect, a data storage device includes data storage means for storing data, and data transfer means juxtaposed with the data storage means for communicating data there between. Pitch static attitude (PSA) biasing means can be provided for establishing a PSA of the data transfer means. Also, logic means can actuate the PSA biasing means to establish a relatively large positive PSA of the data transfer means at least during load and unload and a relatively small positive PSA during operation.
In another aspect, a HDD controller can actuate the PSA bias mechanism to establish a relatively small positive PSA during load and a relatively large positive PSA during unload. The small PSA during loading reduces the risk of the slider not loading to its nominal fly height in the disk zone dedicated to load/unload near the load/unload ramp (if the PSA is too large, the slider can only load at smaller skew angles and linear velocity, which means the slider otherwise might load on to the data zone, which can cause media damage.) The large PSA during unload reduces the force needed to “snap” the slider away from the disk.
The details of the present invention, both as to its structure and operation, can best be understood in reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals refer to like parts, and in which:
Referring initially to
Now referring to
In some embodiments, a the positive PSA that is established during load is smaller than the positive PSA established during unload. The smaller PSA during loading reduces the risk of the slider not loading to it=s nominal fly height in the disk zone dedicated to load/unload near the load/unload ramp, whereas the larger PSA during unload reduces the force needed to “snap” the slider away from the disk.
In contrast, when it is determined that normal operation of the slider 14 is to be implemented, the logic flows to block 34 to actuate the PSA bias mechanism as appropriate to establish the slightly positive PSA of the slider 14 shown in
As examples, the head assembly can be biased such that when no voltage is applied to the PZT 28, a larger PSA is assumed, with a smaller PSA being established by energizing the PZT 28 against the bias. In this example, in case of emergency power off, the correct non-zero PSA is established for unloading by the material bias of the head assembly. Or, the opposite could be effected, wherein the head assembly is materially biased with a relatively small PSA and energizing the PZT 28 results in establishing a relatively large PSA, so that power is saved by not requiring PZT 28 voltages during operation.
In addition to the above, the PSA may be fine tuned during operation based on, e.g., radial position of the slider 14 and/or internal pressure in the HDD 10 and/or fly height. More specifically, moving from block 34 to block 36, the PSA may be adjusted proportionally to pressure, i.e., the PSA is slightly decreased for lower pressures and slightly increased for higher pressures. Decreasing the PSA during operation for lower HDD pressures reduces the torque force applied to the trailing edge and thus reduces the decrease in fly height that can occur when pressure drops, making the HDD 10 less sensitive to pressure fluctuations.
Also, the logic may move to block 38, wherein the PSA may be adjusted slightly based on the radial location of the slider over the disk. This can be done to adjust fly height or avoid contact instability. The desired PSA values and/or corresponding PZT 28 voltages can be accessed using an empirically generated lookup table for various radial positions of the head.
The table can be defined based on magnetic properties such as readback signal, overwrite value, bit error rate, etc. and/or on mechanical properties of clearance established e.g., by decreasing the pressure until head-disk contact occurs.
Similarly, PSA can be increased during operation if the fly height increases, and decreased during operation if the fly height decreases. Magnetic signal amplitude can be monitored to detect unwanted variations in fly height.
While the particular METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DYNAMICALLY ESTABLISHING PITCH STATIC ATTITUDE IN HARD DISK DRIVE as herein shown and described in detail is fully capable of attaining the above-described objects of the invention, it is to be understood that it is the presently preferred embodiment of the present invention and is thus representative of the subject matter which is broadly contemplated by the present invention, that the scope of the present invention fully encompasses other embodiments which may become obvious to those skilled in the art, and that the scope of the present invention is accordingly to be limited by nothing other than the appended claims, in which reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more”. It is not necessary for a device or method to address each and every problem sought to be solved by the present invention, for it to be encompassed by the present claims. Furthermore, no element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element herein is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. '112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited as a “step”instead of an “act”. Absent express definitions herein, claim terms are to be given all ordinary and accustomed meanings that are not irreconcilable with the present specification and file history.
This patent application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/670,948, filed Sep. 25, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,009,801, from which priority is claimed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4663682 | McNeil | May 1987 | A |
5021906 | Chang et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5289325 | Morehouse et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5313352 | Chikazawa et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315454 | Fukakusa | May 1994 | A |
5377058 | Good et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394281 | Kajitani | Feb 1995 | A |
6301080 | Boutaghou | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6362933 | Sampietro et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369986 | Coon | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6433966 | Tang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473259 | Kuo et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6501625 | Boismier et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6535355 | Boutaghou et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6757124 | Kelemen | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6765765 | Bement et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
20010012182 | Boutaghou et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020024774 | Berger et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020054447 | Kurita et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020093769 | Suk et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020101686 | Bement et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030002195 | Sassolini et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030095361 | Shimanouchi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030151854 | Lee | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 242 597 | Mar 1987 | EP |
57-210479 | Dec 1982 | JP |
61194684 | Aug 1986 | JP |
1166382 | Jun 1989 | JP |
1213877 | Aug 1989 | JP |
3012078 | Jan 1991 | JP |
4259970 | Sep 1992 | JP |
6076508 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6084221 | Mar 1994 | JP |
6267219 | Sep 1994 | JP |
2003036624 | Feb 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050073768 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10670948 | Sep 2003 | US |
Child | 10845469 | US |