The present invention relates to encryption. More specifically, the present invention relates to a novel method and apparatus of encryption using binarization and phase information of encrypted data in terms of display or transmission of encrypted data.
Image data security has recently become an important issue. An image is generally a two-dimensional data. In accordance with which, a one-dimensional signal or two-dimensional image may need encryption in many applications for security reasons. Also, encryption of memory, which may comprise one or more images, can be considered. Furthermore, optical security and encryption methods using random phase encoding have been proposed recently, see generally “Optical pattern recognition for validation and security verification”, by B. Javidi and J. L. Horner, Opt. Eng. 33, 1752–1756 (1994). Also see, “Experimental demonstration of the random phase encoding technique for image encryption and security verification”, by B. Javidi, G. Zhang and J. Li, Optical Engineering, 35, 2506–2512, 1996; “Fault tolerance properties of a double phase encoding encryption technique”, by B. Javidi, A. Sergent, G. Zhang, and L. Guibert, Optical Engineering, 36(4), 992–998, 1997; “Practical image encryption scheme by real-valued data”, by Yang, H.-G., and E.-S. Kim, Optical Engineering, 35(9), 2473–2478, 1996; “Random phase encoding for optical security, by Wang, R. K., I. A. Watson, and C. Chatwin”, Optical Engineering, 35(9), 2464–2469, 1996; “Optical implementation of image encryption using random phase encoding”, by Neto, L. G. Y. Sheng, Optical Engineering, 35(9), 2459–2463, 1996; and “Optical image encryption using input and Fourier plane random phase encoding” by Ph. Refregier and B. Javidi, Optics Letters, Vol. 20, 767–770, 1995.
The above-discussed and other drawbacks and deficiencies of the prior art are overcome or alleviated by the method and apparatus of encrypting optical images using binarization and phase information. An image to be encrypted is first multiplied by a key, e.g., a random phase function. The Fourier transform of the product of the image and the random phase function is then multiplied by another key, e.g., another random phase function in the Fourier domain. Taking the inverse Fourier transform, an encrypted image in the output plane is obtained. In accordance with the present invention, this encrypted image is then binarized, which may include binarizing the phase-only part of the encrypted image. The use of binarization enables ease of implementation and data compression while still providing recovery of images having good quality. In addition, the phase of the encrypted image only can be use for description, which makes it easier to display the encryption using techniques such as embossing.
The above-discussed and other features and advantages of the present invention will be appreciated and understood by those skilled in the art from the following detailed description and drawings.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several FIGURES.
Generally, an encryption technique using random phase encoding in both the input plane and the Fourier plane is presented, also see U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/595,873 entitled Method and Apparatus For Encryption by B. Javidi, filed Feb. 6, 1996, which is incorporated by reference. More specifically, each stored image is encrypted and can be read out by a unique code or a universal code. In accordance with this exemplary method, the image to be encrypted is first multiplied by a random phase function. The Fourier transform of the product of the image and the random phase function is then multiplied by another random phase function in the Fourier domain. Taking the inverse Fourier transform, an encrypted image in the output plane is obtained which is then binarized (see, e.g., “Real-Time Optical Information Processing”, by B. Javidi and J. L. Horner, Academic Press, Ch. 4 (1994) and “The Computer In Optical research and Methods” B. R. Frieden ed., Ch. 6, “Computer Generated Holograms”, by W. J. Dallas, Springer Verlog, Berlin (1980), which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety) and stored. The encrypted memory is a stationary white noise if the two encrypting random phase functions are two independent white sequences uniformly distributed on [0, 2π], e.g., see “Optical image encryption based on input plane and Fourier plane random encoding,” by Ph. Refregier and B. Javidi, Opt. Lett., 20(7), (1995), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. This makes it very difficult to decrypt the memory without the knowledge of the phase functions used in the encryption, see “Optical image encryption based on input plane and Fourier plane random encoding,” by Ph. Refregier and B. Javidi, Opt. Lett., 20(7), (1995), Probability, Random Variable, and Stochastic Processes, by A. Papoulis, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York (1984) and “Performance of a double phase encoding, encryption technique using binarized encrypted images” by B. Javidi, A. Sergant and E. Ahouzi, Optical Engineering, Vol. 37, No. 2, 565–569, (1998) which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
By way of example, f(x) denotes optical image to be stored in the memory of a computer. n(x) and b(α) denote two independent white sequences uniformly distributed on [0, 1], respectively. Herein x is a coordinate of the space domain, and a is a coordinate of the Fourier domain. In the encryption process, the key, e.g., the random phase function exp[j2π n(x)] is used in the space domain and the other key, e.g., the random phase function exp[j2πb(α)] is used in the Fourier domain. The encrypted memory can be represented as:
φ(x)={f(x)exp[j2πn(x)]}*μ(x) Equation 1
where μ (x) is the inverse Fourier transform of exp[j2πb (α)], and * denotes the convolution operation. In accordance with the present invention, the data image can only be decrypted when a corresponding key, i.e., exp[−j2πb(α)], is used for the decryption. It will be appreciated that Equation 1 is for a single encrypted signal, whereby a summation of a plurality of such signals would constitute an encrypted memory. Further, while the random phase function is described herein as a generally uniformly distributed white sequence, it is within the scope of the present invention that it is any random distribution, statistical distribution or other unknown distributions.
To decrypt the memory, the Fourier transform of the encrypted memory φ(x) is multiplied by the decoding mask exp[−j2πb(α)]. This causes the encoding phase function exp[j2πb(α)] to be canceled out by the decoding mask exp[−j2πb(α)] that serves as the key for decryption. The decoded image is then inverse Fourier transformed to the space domain. Therefore, the original data image f(x) can be recovered in the space domain. If the stored image is positive, the phase function exp[j2πn(x)] is removed by an intensity sensitive device, such as a video camera. More specifically, |f(x)|2 is obtained, when f(x) has a positive pixel value, knowing |f(x)|2 is equivalent to knowing f(x) whereby the original data image is obtained, as is readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. Alternatively, the decoded image in the space domain is multiplied by a complex conjugate of the original mask, i.e., exp[−j2πn(x)], which will provide the original data image f(x). This alternative is required when f(x) is not positive or real. It will be appreciated that the images not decrypted remain stationary white background noise. Further, while a Fourier transform is described herein it is within the scope of the present invention that a Fresnel transform may be employed. Moreover, when the transformer is unknown, it may also serve as a key.
Since the encrypted image described above is complex, both the amplitude and the phase of the information need to be displayed. Such can be avoided by using holograms. However, for real-time information processing it is preferred that spatial light modulators be used, although simultaneous control of phase and amplitude is difficult. In view of this difficulty, partial information of the encrypted image is used herein for further optical processing. More specifically, the amplitude or the phase information of the encrypted image are used. The phase-only information φψ(x) of the encrypted image is expressed as:
where φ(x) is the encrypted image. The amplitude-only information φA(x) of the encrypted image is expressed as:
φA(x)=|φ(x)| Equation 3
Referring to
To decrypt the memory φ(x), a key, which is complex conjugate of the white random sequence for the encryption, is needed. The encrypted memory is placed at an input plane 100,
Referring now to
In evaluating the quality of these recovered images, the decrypted images (
where f(x) is the original image, N is the number of pixels of the original image, and Ex{|f′(x)|−f(x)} is the spatial averaging over the entire image. The error Er, as calculated from EQUATION 4, in this example is 0.004 for the text image (
In accordance with the present invention, binarization of the encrypted image is introduced to further improve the encryption process. The encrypted image is binarized (see, Jain, A., “Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing” Prentice-Hall, 1989 and Pratt, W., “Digital Image Processing”, Wiley, 1991, both of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety) since the optical implementation of a binary image is much easier than the implementation of a complex image.
Referring now to
φ(x)=φR(x)+jφI(x), Equation 5
where φR(x) is the real part of φ(x) and φI(x) is the imaginary part of φ(x). In a first embodiment the real part and the imaginary part of the encrypted image are binarized 106 and then combined 108 to form a complex image
Referring now to
φ(x)=φA(x)φψ(x), Equation 7
where φψ(x) is the phase part of φ(x) and φA(x) is the amplitude part of φ(x), as defined in EQUATIONS 2 and 3, respectively. The binary phase encrypted image can be expressed as:
Accordingly, only the real part of the encrypted image is binarized 106′ providing the binary phase encrypted image
The quality of these recovered images can be improved by further processing, either optically or digitally. By way of example, an image is further processed by filtering, such as a lowpass filter and/or a spatial averaging filter (see generally, Li H.-Y., Y. Qiao, and D. Psaltis, “Optical network for real-time face recognition”, Applied Optics, 32, 5026–5035, 1993 and Jain, A., “Image Enhancement” (p. 244), in Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, Eds., Prentice-Hall, 1989, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety).
The same processing was applied to the original image of
While the above described embodiments provide examples of encryption/decryption of a specific type of information, it is within the scope of the present invention that such information includes optical images, digitized images, one-dimensional data, two-dimensional data, multi-dimensional data (e.g., color, wavelength) electrical signals or optical signals. Further, while the above described embodiments provide examples of encryption/decryption of a single image, it is within the scope of the present invention that each of the systems described herein is equally applicable to a plurality of images.
While this example is illustrated optically such can easily be accomplished electronically as is readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. Further, while a one dimensional application has been described two dimensional applications are within the scope of the present invention, such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/595,873.
While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation.
This application is a divisional application of Ser. No. 09/204,541 filed on Jan. 29, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,519,340, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/078,254 filed Mar. 17, 1998 which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3679821 | Schroeder | Jul 1972 | A |
| 4393276 | Steele | Jul 1983 | A |
| 4558462 | Horiba et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 5072314 | Chang | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5214534 | Kallman et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5315668 | O'Hair | May 1994 | A |
| 5485312 | Horner et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5639580 | Morton | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5689372 | Morton | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5703970 | Atashroo | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5712912 | Tomko et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5740276 | Tomko et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5828495 | Schindler | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5835194 | Morton | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5867322 | Morton | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5892597 | Iwata et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5903648 | Javidi | May 1999 | A |
| 5933228 | Taylor et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5956083 | Taylor et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5959718 | Morton | Sep 1999 | A |
| 6028719 | Beckstead et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6046848 | Gulick, Jr. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6219794 | Soutar et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030152227 A1 | Aug 2003 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60078254 | Mar 1998 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09204541 | Jan 1999 | US |
| Child | 10318841 | US |