A method and apparatus for enhancing the soil structure of land.
Subsoil tillers are used to till the subsoil of land, which loosens the soil to a deeper depth, while also reducing the amount of soil erosion. An example of a subsoil tiller is the Paratill™ produced by Bigham Brothers Inc.
There is provided a method of enhancing the soil structure of land having a topsoil layer and a subsoil layer beneath the topsoil layer. The method comprises the steps of providing at least one subsoil tiller blade having a tilling surface and a bottom end, and a channel positioned behind the tilling surface of the subsoil tiller blade for injecting nutrients toward the bottom end of the subsoil tiller blade. The subsoil tiller blade is inserted into the land such that the bottom end extends into the subsoil layer. The subsoil tiller blade is driven through the land such that the tilling surface loosens the subsoil layer while the channel deposits nutrients into the subsoil layer.
According to another aspect, there is provided an apparatus for use in enhancing the soil structure of land having a topsoil layer and a subsoil layer. The apparatus comprises a support frame, and at least one subsoil tiller blade mounted below the support frame. The subsoil tiller blade has a tilling surface that loosens the subsoil when driven through the land, and a bottom end. A storage tank has a conveyor for conveying nutrients into an outlet of the storage tank. At least one channel has an inlet connected to the outlet of the storage tank and an outlet toward the bottom end of the at least one subsoil tiller for depositing the pellets into the subsoil layer.
These and other features will become more apparent from the following description in which reference is made to the appended drawings, the drawings are for the purpose of illustration only and are not intended to be in any way limiting, wherein:
A method and apparatus for reclaiming land will now be described with reference to
In order to enhance the soil structure the land, tilling is used to loosen the soil and relieve the compaction. In reclamation projects, the area will be replanted in order to allow nature to reclaim the land. However, it is difficult for roots to grow through compacted land, and the roots have a tendency to remain close to the top where the soil is looser, which slows the recovery of the subsoil.
It may be desirable to enhance the soil structure of various types of soil for different reasons, such as to reclaim the land after working, improve the soil structure in farmland, or enhance the structure in naturally occurring soils. For example, the soil structure of land at worksites is often damaged by heavy equipment. Sites typically damages may include along power lines, along oil and gas pipelines, and well site pads. This makes it difficult for plants to establish roots in the ground. Left to nature alone, recovery can take from 30 to 50 years. Other examples includes farm land, where repeatedly driving over land creates a hard “shell” under the topsoil that is tilled regularly, or soils that are naturally compacted, for a variety of reasons.
The present method encourages the growth of root systems by loosening the compacted land, and injecting nutrients at an appropriate depth in the subsoil. The nutrients encourage the roots to grow downward to reach them, and the loosened soil makes it easier for the roots to reach them. The depth of injection will vary depending on soil conditions, however it is anticipated that a depth of between 20 cm and 50 cm is sufficient for most situations. As the roots grow deeper, more moisture and nutrients are available to them, and the plants become stronger and more productive. The land is reclaimed or enhanced as root systems are established. As the roots from previous years plant growth decays, the repair of soil structure is perpetuated. Some results have suggested that recovery of the land occurs using the method described herein within five years instead of 30 to 50 years.
Referring to
Subsoil injector 10 has a three-point hitch 18 to be attached to a prime mover, such as a tractor (not shown). The depth of subsoil injector 10 can then be controlled by the prime mover via the three point hitch. The prime mover pulls subsoil injector 10 through the land to be enhanced. While this is a common approach for operating tilling implements, it will be understood that depth control and motive forces may also be applied using other strategies.
Referring to
Preferably, nutrients 27 are in pellet form to make them easier to handle and inject. Nutrients 27 may be pellets of organic matter that has been dehydrated, sterilized and compacted, such as a pelletized version of the organic matter that is available from EarthRenew Organics Ltd. of Calgary, AB. Pellets may also be fertilizers, material containing carbon, or combinations. Pellets may be in granular form similar to traditional fertilizer, or have a larger diameter, and will depend on the final design of hopper 14, channel 28 and conveyor 29.
As subsoil tillers 16 break up the compacted ground, this opens the ground for roots to establish themselves. Deep root action is encouraged as nutrients are injected in subsoil layer 26, and facilitated by subsoil tiller 16 breaking up soil layers 24 and 26.
In this patent document, the word “comprising” is used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. A reference to an element by the indefinite article “a” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the element is present, unless the context clearly requires that there be one and only one of the elements.
The following claims are to be understood to include what is specifically illustrated and described above, what is conceptually equivalent, and what can be obviously substituted. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various adaptations and modifications of the described embodiments can be configured without departing from the scope of the claims. The illustrated embodiments have been set forth only as examples and should not be taken as limiting the invention. It is to be understood that, within the scope of the following claims, the invention may be practiced other than as specifically illustrated and described.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3563045 | Hansen | Feb 1971 | A |
3618538 | Brannan | Nov 1971 | A |
3699693 | Nelkin et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3854429 | Blair | Dec 1974 | A |
3908567 | Brannan | Sep 1975 | A |
4033271 | Williams et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4119223 | Fiechter | Oct 1978 | A |
4337712 | Michalko | Jul 1982 | A |
4592294 | Dietrich, Sr. et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
5136954 | Fetaz et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5433277 | Davison | Jul 1995 | A |
5558471 | Payne | Sep 1996 | A |
6860336 | Robillard | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7004090 | Swanson | Feb 2006 | B2 |
20030113903 | Miyazaki | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20060254331 | Burnham | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090078178 | Beaujot | Mar 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 485 632 | Oct 2005 | CA |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110048298 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |