This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/583,786, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LABEL DETECTION” by Lam, as well as U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/492,670, entitled “PRODUCT STATUS DETECTION SYSTEM” by Perrella et al., all having the same filing date as the present application. The contents of the above-reference applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Environments in which inventories of objects are managed, such as products for purchase in a retail environment, may be complex and fluid. For example, a given environment may contain a wide variety of objects with different attributes (size, shape, price and the like). Further, the placement and quantity of the objects in the environment may change frequently. Still further, imaging conditions such as lighting may be variable both over time and at different locations in the environment. These factors may reduce the accuracy with which information concerning the objects may be collected within the environment.
The accompanying figures, where like reference numerals refer to identical or functionally similar elements throughout the separate views, together with the detailed description below, are incorporated in and form part of the specification, and serve to further illustrate embodiments of concepts that include the claimed invention, and explain various principles and advantages of those embodiments.
Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help to improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.
The apparatus and method components have been represented where appropriate by conventional symbols in the drawings, showing only those specific details that are pertinent to understanding the embodiments of the present invention so as not to obscure the disclosure with details that will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of the description herein.
Environments such as warehouses, retail locations (e.g. grocery stores) and the like typically contain a wide variety of products supported on shelves, for selection and purchase by customers. The products are generally labelled—for example, via a label placed on a shelf edge, a peg extending from a back of the shelf, or directly on the product itself—with information such as the price of the product, an identifier such as a SKU number, and the like. Such environments typically also store reference data relating to the products, for example in a central database, which is consulted by point-of-sale terminals during customer checkout to retrieve price information for the products being purchased. In some cases, the price physically labelled on or near the product on the shelves may not match the price stored in the above-mentioned database, leading to a conflict between the label price and the reference price at the point-of-sale terminal.
Mismatches between label and reference prices may require corrective action at one or both of the label and the central database. However, detecting such mismatches in order to allow corrective action to be taken is conventionally performed by human employees, via visual assessment of the shelves and manually-initiated barcode scanning. This form of detection is labor-intensive and therefore costly, as well as error-prone.
Attempts to automate the detection of such mismatches, for example via machine vision techniques, are complicated by difficulties in correctly extracting labelled prices from image data. Such difficulties include non-label text present on products, as well as imaging artifacts such as variations in contrast, reflections, and the like. Autonomous detection of mismatches between label information and reference information is further complicated by the need to retrieve the correct reference data with which to compare the price text extracted from shelf images. To retrieve reference data, the identity of the product to which the label text relates must also be autonomously detected—a process that is subject to similar difficulties as those outlined above in connection with text detection and interpretation.
Examples disclosed herein are directed to a method of extracting price text from an image set, including: obtaining input data comprising (i) a plurality of images depicting shelves supporting products, and (ii) for each of the images, a set of text regions and corresponding price text strings; registering the images to a common frame of reference; identifying a subset of the text regions having overlapping locations in the common frame of reference; selecting one of the text regions from the subset; and presenting the price text string corresponding to the one of the text regions for further processing.
The server 101 includes a special purpose imaging controller, such as a processor 120, specifically designed to control the mobile automation apparatus 103 to capture data, obtain the captured data via the communications interface 124 and store the captured data in a repository 132 in the memory 122. The server 101 is further configured to perform various post-processing operations on the captured data and to detect the status of the products 112 on the shelves 110. When certain status indicators are detected by the imaging processor 120, the server 101 is also configured to transmit status notifications (e.g. notifications indicating that products are out-of-stock, low stock or misplaced) to the mobile device 105. The processor 120 is interconnected with a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, such as a memory 122, having stored thereon computer readable instructions for executing price text detection and interpretation, as discussed in further detail below. The memory 122 includes a combination of volatile (e.g. Random Access Memory or RAM) and non-volatile memory (e.g. read only memory or ROM, Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory or EEPROM, flash memory). The processor 120 and the memory 122 each comprise one or more integrated circuits. In an embodiment, the processor 120, further includes one or more central processing units (CPUs) and/or graphics processing units (GPUs). In an embodiment, a specially designed integrated circuit, such as a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), is designed to perform the price text detection and interpretation discussed herein, either alternatively or in addition to the imaging controller/processor 120 and memory 122. As those of skill in the art will realize, the mobile automation apparatus 103 also includes one or more controllers or processors and/or FPGAs, in communication with the controller 120, specifically configured to control navigational and/or data capture aspects of the apparatus 103.
The server 101 also includes a communications interface 124 interconnected with the processor 120. The communications interface 124 includes suitable hardware (e.g. transmitters, receivers, network interface controllers and the like) allowing the server 101 to communicate with other computing devices—particularly the apparatus 103 and the mobile device 105—via the links 107. The links 107 may be direct links, or links that traverse one or more networks, including both local and wide-area networks. The specific components of the communications interface 124 are selected based on the type of network or other links that the server 101 is required to communicate over. In the present example, a wireless local-area network is implemented within the retail environment via the deployment of one or more wireless access points. The links 107 therefore include both wireless links between the apparatus 103 and the mobile device 105 and the above-mentioned access points, and a wired link (e.g. an Ethernet-based link) between the server 101 and the access point.
The memory 122 stores a plurality of applications, each including a plurality of computer readable instructions executable by the processor 120. The execution of the above-mentioned instructions by the processor 120 configures the server 101 to perform various actions discussed herein. The applications stored in the memory 122 include a control application 128, which may also be implemented as a suite of logically distinct applications. In general, via execution of the control application 128 or subcomponents thereof, the processor 120 is configured to implement various functionality. The processor 120, as configured via the execution of the control application 128, is also referred to herein as the controller 120. As will now be apparent, some or all of the functionality implemented by the controller 120 described below may also be performed by preconfigured hardware elements (e.g. one or more ASICs) rather than by execution of the control application 128 by the processor 120.
In the present example, in particular, the server 101 is configured via the execution of the control application 128 by the processor 120, to process image and depth data captured by the apparatus 103 to extract price text strings from sets of shelf images, and to identify and retrieve corresponding reference data for comparison to the price text strings.
Turning now to
The control application 128, in brief, includes components configured to obtain a plurality of shelf images and, with each image, a set of text region locations and corresponding price text strings. The components of the control application 128 are further configured to identify certain subsets of the above-mentioned text regions and select one text region from each subset. Further, the components of the control application 128 are configured to obtain reference data corresponding to the selected text region, and to compare the price string of the selected region with the reference data to detect mismatches.
More specifically, in the present example, the control application 128 includes an image set processor 200 configured to obtain and register the plurality of shelf images. The control application 128 further includes a selector 204 configured to identify subsets of text regions and select a text region from each subset, as well as an extractor 208 configured to extract portions of the images corresponding to the selected text regions, for use in obtaining reference data. In addition, the control application 128 includes a comparator 212 configured to obtain reference data employing the output of the extractor 208, and to determine whether a mismatch exists between the reference data and the price text associated with the images.
The functionality of the control application 128 will now be described in greater detail, with reference to the components illustrated in
The performance of the method 300 begins at block 305, at which the controller 120, and in particular the image set processor 200, is configured to obtain and register a set of shelf images, such as digital images of the shelf 110, for example captured by the apparatus 103 and stored in the repository 132. An example set of images 400-1, 400-2 and 400-3 is illustrated in
At block 305, the image set processor 200 is also configured to obtain, for each of the images 400, a set of text regions and corresponding price text strings. The text regions correspond to regions within the images 400 that have been determined to contain price text, for example by another component of the control application 128. In brief, each text region indicates an area within an image 400 that likely contains a price text string, as well as a machine-readable interpretation of the price text string (generated, for example, by an optical character recognition or OCR operation). In other words, each text region indicates an area within an image 400 that likely depicts a price label corresponding to one of the products 112.
The set of text regions and price text strings may be obtained at block 305 in a variety of formats. For example, the text regions and price text strings may be indicated in the image data itself, as an overlay or in one or more metadata fields. In the present example, the text regions and price text strings are obtained from the repository 132 as a list of bounding box definitions and corresponding strings, as shown below in Table 1. The bounding boxes 416 are illustrated in
The bounding box coordinates shown in Table 1 are typically indicated as pixel positions within each image; in the example above, two pixel positions are included in each record, corresponding to the top-left and bottom-right corners of each bounding box. As will now be apparent, a variety of other formats may be employed for storing the bounding box locations and dimensions.
As seen in Table 1, the data obtained at block 305 also includes the above-mentioned price text strings and, in association with each price text string, a confidence level value. The confidence levels shown above are formatted as percentages, but any other suitable format may also be used to convey a level of certainty that the price text string correctly reflects the price text printed on the labels depicted in the images 400. The confidence levels are typically generated during the OCR operation mentioned earlier, employed to generate the price text strings from image data.
Turning to
Referring to
Returning to
In other examples, the selector 204 is configured to perform additional actions at block 310. Referring to
At block 710, the selector 204 is configured to perform a shelf edge validation. The image data obtained at block 305 typically also includes depth measurements obtained by the apparatus 103 and stored in the repository 132 in association with the images 400. The depth measurements can therefore also be registered with the images 400, such that at least a subset of the pixels in each image 400 is mapped to a depth measurement, representing a location in a point cloud.
The selector 204 is configured to validate the retrieved shelf edge location by cropping the point cloud mentioned above to select a subset of the points therein falling within the retrieved location of the shelf edge. In other words, the depth measurements that do not fall within the retrieved shelf edge location are discarded or ignored for the purposes of block 710. Having cropped the point cloud, the selector 204 is then configured to group the remaining points into clusters based on their relative positions. In the present example, the selector 204 is configured to compare each pair of points in the cropped point cloud, and when the distance between the pair is below a predetermined threshold, the pair of points are added to a cluster. This process is repeated until all points in the cropped point cloud have been assigned to clusters. Other cluster-building operations may also be performed, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
The selector 204 is then configured to select a primary one of the clusters of points for further processing. More specifically, the selector 204 is configured, in the present example, to select the largest cluster, as defined by the number of points in the cluster. The selector 204 can also apply a minimum size threshold, and thus select the largest cluster that meets the minimum size threshold. If no clusters meet the minimum size threshold, performance of the method 315 proceeds to block 720, as will be discussed earlier.
Having selected a primary cluster of points, the selector 204 is configured to fit a plane to the cluster of points by a suitable plane-fitting operation (e.g. the random sample consensus, or RANSAC, plane fitting operation; or a least squares fitting operation, in which the square of the distance between each point and the plane is minimized). The selector 204 is further configured to determine the normal of the fitted plane. That is, the selector 204 is configured to determine the orientation of a line or vector that is perpendicular to the fitted plane. The selector 204 is further configured to determine whether the orientation of the normal matches a predetermined target orientation corresponding to the normal of the known shelf edge. For example, given that shelf edges are typically vertical surfaces, the target orientation may be a horizontal orientation (i.e. substantially parallel to a ground surface in the retail environment). The repository 132 may specify any suitable target orientation, however, based on the physical structure of the shelf edge 404. When the orientation of the normal substantially matches the target orientation, the retrieved shelf edge location is presumed to be valid. That is, the selector 204 is configured to assume that the plane fitted to the selected cluster of points corresponds to a portion of the shelf edge 404, because the orientation of that plane matches the expected orientation of the shelf edge 404. In such a situation, the determination at block 715 is therefore affirmative and the performance of the method 315 proceeds to block 725.
When the determination at block 715 is negative, performance of the method 315 instead proceeds to block 720. Block 720 is also performed when no shelf location is available from the repository 132, or when, as noted above, no cluster of depth measurements exceeds a minimum size threshold. At block 720, the selector 204 is configured to request an updated shelf edge location. The request can be generated and sent, for example, to another component of the control application 128 which performs a shelf edge detection operation employing the images 400 and depth measurements.
At block 725, having either validated the shelf edge location obtained at block 705 or received a shelf edge location at block 720, the selector 204 is configured to discard any text regions 416 that are not coincident with the shelf edge location. Referring to
At block 730, the selector 204 is configured to identify the subsets of overlapping text regions 416 from the text regions remaining after the performance of block 725. Thus, in the present example, referring to
Returning to
At block 320, the extractor 208 is configured to extract an area of at least one of the images 400 corresponding to each identified subset 600. In the present example, the area is extracted from the registered image set shown in
As seen in
Following the extraction of the image areas, the extractor 208 is configured to obtain reference data by providing each extracted image area to a barcode decoder component of the control application 128 (not shown), or of any other element of the system 100. Any suitable decoder may be implemented to identify and decode the barcodes in the extracted areas of the images 400. The extractor 208 is therefore also configured to receive, from the above-mentioned decoder, decoded data corresponding to each extracted image area, such as product identifiers (e.g. UPC numbers). In other examples, rather than extracting areas of the image for transmission to the decoder, the extractor is configured to transmit the entire registered set of images 400 to the decoder, and receive a plurality of decoded data strings along with indications of their locations within the images. In such examples, the extractor is configured to associate each selected text region 416 with one of the barcodes, based on distances between the barcodes and the text region 416. For example, the extractor 208 can be configured to determine the distance between each pair of a text region and a barcode, and associate with each text region 416 the closest barcode to that text region 416.
In further examples, such as those in which the labels do not include barcodes, the reference data is obtained not by decoding barcodes but by providing the images 400 to a product recognition engine, which may be a further component of the control application 128, or a separate component from the control application 128. The product recognition engine is configured to compare the images 400 to a database of product models and, for example based on image feature matching, identify products within the image data and return product identifiers and their locations in the image, which are employed to retrieve a reference price. At block 320, the comparator 212 is therefore configured, in such examples, to receive from the product recognition engine a set of product locations within the images 400 and corresponding product identifiers. The comparator 212 is also configured to associate the received product identifiers with the price text strings, for example based on the distance between the product location (within the image 400) received from the product recognition engine and the location of the price text string within the image 400. In further examples, geometric constraints may be applied to the above association, in addition to an evaluation of distance between price text and product. For example, a price text string may be associated with a product identifier if the price text string was obtained from an area of the image 400 that is both within a threshold distance of the product location and below or above, rather than to one side of, the product location.
Having obtained decoded data from the extracted areas of the images 400, the extractor 208 is configured to then transmit a request, for example to the repository 132, containing the decoded data (or the product identifier received from the product recognition engine) and requesting a reference price for each item of decoded data (that is, for each of the selected text regions 416). As noted earlier, the repository 132 or any other suitable data source stores reference data for the products 112, including product identifiers and corresponding reference price strings. The extractor 208 is configured, upon receiving the reference prices, to pass the product identifiers obtained from the barcodes, the price text strings obtained at block 305 for the selected text regions 416, and the reference price strings obtained at block 320, to the comparator 312. An example of data passed to the comparator 312 is shown in Table 2.
The comparator 212, responsive to receiving the price text strings and reference prices, is configured at block 325 to determine whether the price text string matches the corresponding reference price for each selected text region 416. As will be apparent from Table 2, the price text string and reference price for the text regions 416-1 and 416-3 match, while the price text string and reference price for the text region 416-2 do not match. Therefore, the performance of the method 300 proceeds to block 330, at which the comparator 212 is configured to generate and present a mismatch alert, for example via a user interface of the mobile device 105 or another remote computing device. The mismatch alert generated at block 330 includes the product identifier (e.g. as shown in Table 2), as well as the location within the retail environment that corresponds to the text region 416. For example, the location may indicate the aisle and shelf module on which the label corresponding to the mismatched text region 416 is located. The mismatch alert can be presented in a variety of ways. In some examples, the alert is transmitted from the server 101 to the mobile device 105 for presentation on a display of the mobile device 105. In other examples, the alert is stored in the repository 132 for further processing.
When the determination at block 325 is affirmative, the performance of the method 300 proceeds to block 335, at which the match result is presented, for example by storing an indication in the repository 132 that a successful price compliance check has been performed for the relevant product identifier. In other examples, block 330 may be omitted.
In the foregoing specification, specific embodiments have been described. However, one of ordinary skill in the art appreciates that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims below. Accordingly, the specification and figures are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of present teachings.
The benefits, advantages, solutions to problems, and any element(s) that may cause any benefit, advantage, or solution to occur or become more pronounced are not to be construed as a critical, required, or essential features or elements of any or all the claims. The invention is defined solely by the appended claims including any amendments made during the pendency of this application and all equivalents of those claims as issued.
Moreover in this document, relational terms such as first and second, top and bottom, and the like may be used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. The terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “has”, “having,” “includes”, “including,” “contains”, “containing” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. An element proceeded by “comprises . . . a”, “has . . . a”, “includes . . . a”, “contains . . . a” does not, without more constraints, preclude the existence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises, has, includes, contains the element. The terms “a” and “an” are defined as one or more unless explicitly stated otherwise herein. The terms “substantially”, “essentially”, “approximately”, “about” or any other version thereof, are defined as being close to as understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, and in one non-limiting embodiment the term is defined to be within 10%, in another embodiment within 5%, in another embodiment within 1% and in another embodiment within 0.5%. The term “coupled” as used herein is defined as connected, although not necessarily directly and not necessarily mechanically. A device or structure that is “configured” in a certain way is configured in at least that way, but may also be configured in ways that are not listed.
It will be appreciated that some embodiments may be comprised of one or more generic or specialized processors (or “processing devices”) such as microprocessors, digital signal processors, customized processors and field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) and unique stored program instructions (including both software and firmware) that control the one or more processors to implement, in conjunction with certain non-processor circuits, some, most, or all of the functions of the method and/or apparatus described herein. Alternatively, some or all functions could be implemented by a state machine that has no stored program instructions, or in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), in which each function or some combinations of certain of the functions are implemented as custom logic. Of course, a combination of the two approaches could be used.
Moreover, an embodiment can be implemented as a computer-readable storage medium having computer readable code stored thereon for programming a computer (e.g., comprising a processor) to perform a method as described and claimed herein. Examples of such computer-readable storage mediums include, but are not limited to, a hard disk, a CD-ROM, an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, a ROM (Read Only Memory), a PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), an EPROM (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) and a Flash memory. Further, it is expected that one of ordinary skill, notwithstanding possibly significant effort and many design choices motivated by, for example, available time, current technology, and economic considerations, when guided by the concepts and principles disclosed herein will be readily capable of generating such software instructions and programs and ICs with minimal experimentation.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in various embodiments for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5209712 | Ferri | May 1993 | A |
5214615 | Bauer | May 1993 | A |
5408322 | Hsu et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414268 | McGee | May 1995 | A |
5534762 | Kim | Jul 1996 | A |
5566280 | Fukui et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5953055 | Huang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5988862 | Kacyra et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6026376 | Kenney | Feb 2000 | A |
6034379 | Bunte et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6075905 | Herman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6115114 | Berg et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141293 | Amorai-Moriya et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6304855 | Burke | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6442507 | Skidmore et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6549825 | Kurata | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6580441 | Schileru-Key | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6711293 | Lowe | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721769 | Rappaport et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6836567 | Silver et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6995762 | Pavlidis et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7090135 | Patel | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7137207 | Armstrong et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7245558 | Willins et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7248754 | Cato | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7277187 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7373722 | Cooper et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7474389 | Greenberg et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7487595 | Armstrong et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7493336 | Noonan | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7508794 | Feather et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7527205 | Zhu et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7605817 | Zhang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7647752 | Magnell | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7693757 | Zimmerman | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7726575 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751928 | Antony et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7783383 | Eliuk et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7839531 | Sugiyama | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7845560 | Emanuel et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7885865 | Benson et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7925114 | Mai et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7957998 | Riley et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7996179 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8009864 | Linaker et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8049621 | Egan | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8091782 | Cato et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8094902 | Crandall et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8094937 | Teoh et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8132728 | Dwinell et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8134717 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8189855 | Opalach | May 2012 | B2 |
8199977 | Krishnaswamy et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8207964 | Meadow et al. | Jun 2012 | B1 |
8233055 | Matsunaga et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8265895 | Willins et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8277396 | Scott et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8284988 | Sones et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8423431 | Rouaix et al. | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8429004 | Hamilton et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8463079 | Ackley et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8479996 | Barkan et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8520067 | Ersue | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8542252 | Perez et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8599303 | Stettner | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8630924 | Groenevelt | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8660338 | Ma et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8743176 | Stettner et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757479 | Clark et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8812226 | Zeng | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8923893 | Austin et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8939369 | Olmstead et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8954188 | Sullivan et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8958911 | Wong et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8971637 | Rivard | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8989342 | Liesenfelt et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9007601 | Steffey et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9037287 | Grauberger et al. | May 2015 | B1 |
9064394 | Trundle | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9070285 | Ramu et al. | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9129277 | MacIntosh | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9135491 | Morandi | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9159047 | Winkel | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9171442 | Clements | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9247211 | Zhang | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9329269 | Zeng | May 2016 | B2 |
9349076 | Liu et al. | May 2016 | B1 |
9367831 | Besehanic | Jun 2016 | B1 |
9380222 | Clayton et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9396554 | Williams et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9400170 | Steffey | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9424482 | Patel et al. | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9517767 | Kentley et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9542746 | Wu et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9549125 | Goyal et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9562971 | Shenkar et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9565400 | Curlander et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9600731 | Yasunaga et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9600892 | Patel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9612123 | Levinson et al. | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9639935 | Douady-Pleven et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9697429 | Patel et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9766074 | Roumeliotis et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9778388 | Connor | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9791862 | Connor | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9805240 | Zheng et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9811754 | Schwartz | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9827683 | Hance et al. | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9880009 | Bell | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9928708 | Lin et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9980009 | Jiang et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9994339 | Colson et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10019803 | Venable | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10111646 | Nycz et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10121072 | Kekatpure | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10127438 | Fisher et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10197400 | Jesudason et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10210603 | Venable et al. | Feb 2019 | B2 |
10229386 | Thomas | Mar 2019 | B2 |
10248653 | Blassin et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10265871 | Hance et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10289990 | Rizzolo et al. | May 2019 | B2 |
10336543 | Sills et al. | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10349031 | DeLuca | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10352689 | Brown et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10394244 | Song et al. | Aug 2019 | B2 |
20010041948 | Ross et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020006231 | Jayant et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020097439 | Braica | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020146170 | Rom | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020158453 | Levine | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020164236 | Fukuhara et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030003925 | Suzuki | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030094494 | Blanford | May 2003 | A1 |
20030174891 | Wenzel et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040021313 | Gardner et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040131278 | Imagawa et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040240754 | Smith et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050016004 | Armstrong et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050114059 | Chang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050213082 | DiBernardo et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213109 | Schell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060032915 | Schwartz | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060045325 | Zavadsky et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106742 | Bochicchio et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060285486 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070036398 | Chen | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070074410 | Armstrong et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070272732 | Hindmon | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080002866 | Fujiwara | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080025565 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027591 | Lenser et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080077511 | Zimmerman | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080159634 | Sharma et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080164310 | Dupuy et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175513 | Lai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181529 | Michel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080238919 | Pack | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080294487 | Nasser | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090009123 | Skaff | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090024353 | Lee et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090057411 | Madej et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090059270 | Opalach et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090060349 | Linaker | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063306 | Fano et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090063307 | Groenovelt | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090074303 | Filimonova et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088975 | Sato et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090103773 | Wheeler et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125350 | Lessing et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090125535 | Basso et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090152391 | McWhirk | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090160975 | Kwan | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090192921 | Hicks | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090206161 | Olmstead | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090236155 | Skaff | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090252437 | Li et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090323121 | Valkenburg et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100026804 | Tanizaki et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070365 | Siotia et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082194 | Yabushita et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100091094 | Sekowski | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100118116 | Tomasz et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100131234 | Stewart et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100141806 | Uemura et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100171826 | Hamilton et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208039 | Stettner | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100214873 | Somasundaram et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100241289 | Sandberg | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100295850 | Katz et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100315412 | Sinha et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100326939 | Clark et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007967 | Soderberg | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110047636 | Stachon et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110052043 | Hyung et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110093306 | Nielsen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110137527 | Simon et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110168774 | Magal | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172875 | Gibbs | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110188759 | Filimonova | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110216063 | Hayes | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242286 | Pace et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254840 | Halstead | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110286007 | Pangrazio et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110288816 | Thierman | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110310088 | Adabala et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120019393 | Wolinsky et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120022913 | Volkmann et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120069051 | Hagbi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075342 | Choubassi et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120133639 | Kopf | May 2012 | A1 |
20120169530 | Padmanabhan et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179621 | Moir et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120185112 | Sung et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120194644 | Newcombe | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120197464 | Wang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120201466 | Funayama et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120209553 | Doytchinov et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120236119 | Rhee et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120249802 | Taylor | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120250978 | Taylor | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120269383 | Bobbitt et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120287249 | Choo et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120307108 | Forutanpour | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120323620 | Hofman et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130030700 | Miller et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130119138 | Winkel | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132913 | Fu et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130134178 | Lu | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138246 | Gutmann et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130142421 | Silver | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130144565 | Miller | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130154802 | O'Haire et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130156292 | Chang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130162806 | Ding et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130176398 | Bonner et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130178227 | Vartanian et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130182114 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130226344 | Wong et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228620 | Ahem et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130235165 | Gharib et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130236089 | Litvak et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130278631 | Border et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130299306 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130299313 | Baek, IV et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130300729 | Grimaud | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130303193 | Dharwada et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130321418 | Kirk | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130329013 | Metois et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130341400 | Lancaster-Larocque | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140002597 | Taguchi et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003655 | Gopalkrishnan et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140003727 | Lortz et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140016832 | Kong et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140019311 | Tanaka | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140025201 | Ryu et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140028837 | Gao et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140047342 | Breternitz et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140049616 | Stettner | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140052555 | MacIntosh | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140086483 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140098094 | Neumann et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140100813 | Showering | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140104413 | McCloskey et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140129027 | Schnittman | May 2014 | A1 |
20140156133 | Cullinane et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140192050 | Qiu et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140195374 | Bassemir et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140214547 | Signorelli et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140267614 | Ding et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140267688 | Aich et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277691 | Jacobus et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140277692 | Buzan et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140300637 | Fan et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140344401 | Varney et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140351073 | Murphy et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140369607 | Patel et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150015602 | Beaudoin | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150019391 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150029339 | Kobres et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150039458 | Reid | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150088618 | Basir et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150088703 | Yan | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150092066 | Geiss et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150106403 | Haverinen et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150117788 | Patel | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150139010 | Jeong et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150154467 | Feng et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150161793 | Takahashi | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150170256 | Pettyjohn et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150181198 | Baele et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150212521 | Pack et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150245358 | Schmidt | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150262116 | Katircioglu et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150279035 | Wolski et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150298317 | Wang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150352721 | Wicks et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363625 | Wu | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150363758 | Wu | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150379704 | Chandrasekar et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160026253 | Bradski et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160044862 | Kocer | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160061591 | Pangrazio et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160070981 | Sasaki et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160092943 | Vigier et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160012588 | Taguchi et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160104041 | Bowers et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160107690 | Oyama et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160112628 | Super et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160114488 | Mascorro Medina et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160129592 | Saboo et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160132815 | Itoko et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160150217 | Popov | May 2016 | A1 |
20160156898 | Ren et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160163067 | Williams et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171336 | Schwartz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171429 | Schwartz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160171707 | Schwartz | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160185347 | Lefevre et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160191759 | Somanath et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160253735 | Scudillo et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160253844 | Petrovskaya et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160271795 | Vicenti | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160313133 | Zeng et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160328618 | Patel et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160353099 | Thomson et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160364634 | Davis | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170004649 | Collet Romea et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170011281 | Dijkman et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170011308 | Sun et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170032311 | Rizzolo et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170041553 | Cao et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170066459 | Singh | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170074659 | Giurgiu et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170150129 | Pangrazio | May 2017 | A1 |
20170193434 | Shah et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170219338 | Brown et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170219353 | Alesiani | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170227645 | Swope et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170227647 | Balk | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170228885 | Baumgartner | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170261993 | Venable et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170262724 | Wu et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170280125 | Brown et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170286773 | Skaff | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170286901 | Skaff et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170323376 | Glaser et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180001481 | Shah et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180005035 | Bogolea et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180005176 | Williams et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180020145 | Kotfis et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180051991 | Hong | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180053091 | Savvides et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180053305 | Gu et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180101813 | Paat et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180114183 | Howell | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180143003 | Clayton et al. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180174325 | Fu et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180201423 | Drzewiecki et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180204111 | Zadeh et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180281191 | Sinyavskiy et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180293442 | Fridental et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180313956 | Rzeszutek et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180314260 | Jen et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180314908 | Lam | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315007 | Kingsford et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315065 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315173 | Phan et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180315865 | Haist et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20190057588 | Savvides et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190065861 | Savvides et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190073554 | Rzeszutek | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190180150 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190197728 | Yamao | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190392212 | Sawhney et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2835830 | Nov 2012 | CA |
3028156 | Jan 2018 | CA |
104200086 | Dec 2014 | CN |
107067382 | Aug 2017 | CN |
0766098 | Apr 1997 | EP |
1311993 | May 2007 | EP |
2309378 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2439487 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2472475 | Jul 2012 | EP |
2562688 | Feb 2013 | EP |
2662831 | Nov 2013 | EP |
2693362 | Feb 2014 | EP |
2323238 | Sep 1998 | GB |
2330265 | Apr 1999 | GB |
101234798 | Jan 2009 | KR |
1020190031431 | Mar 2019 | KR |
WO 9923600 | May 1999 | WO |
2003002935 | Jan 2003 | WO |
2003025805 | Mar 2003 | WO |
2006136958 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007042251 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2008057504 | May 2008 | WO |
2008154611 | Dec 2008 | WO |
2012103199 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012103202 | Aug 2012 | WO |
2012154801 | Nov 2012 | WO |
2013165674 | Nov 2013 | WO |
2014066422 | May 2014 | WO |
2014092552 | Jun 2014 | WO |
2014181323 | Nov 2014 | WO |
2015127503 | Sep 2015 | WO |
2016020038 | Feb 2016 | WO |
2018018007 | Jan 2018 | WO |
2019023249 | Jan 2019 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/070996 dated Apr. 2, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/053212 dated Dec. 1, 2014. |
Bohm, “Multi-Image Fusion for Occlusion-Free Facade Texturing”, International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, pp. 867-872 (Jan. 2004). |
Senthilkumaran, et al., “Edge Detection Techniques for Image Segmentation—A Survey of Soft Computing Approaches”, International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, vol. 1, No. 2 (May 2009). |
Uchiyama, et al., “Removal of Moving Objects from a Street-View Image by Fusing Multiple Image Sequences”, Pattern Recognition, 2010, 20th International Conference On, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 3456-3459 (Aug. 23, 2010). |
Tseng, et al., “A Cloud Removal Approach for Aerial Image Visualization”, International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information & Control, vol. 9 No. 6, pp. 2421-2440 (Jun. 2013). |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Mar. 11, 2015 for GB Patent Application No. 1417218.3. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report dated Jan. 22, 2016 for GB Patent Application No. 1417218.3 (2 pages). |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report dated Jan. 22, 2016 tor GB Patent Application No. 1521272.3 (6 pages). |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/568,175 dated Sep. 23, 2014. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/693,503 dated Mar. 11, 2016. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/068,495 dated Apr. 25, 2016. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/211,103 dated Apr. 5, 2017. |
Notice of allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/518,091 dated Apr. 12, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/583,717, filed May 1, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/583,680, filed May 1, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/583,740, filed May 1, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/583,759, filed May 1, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/583,773, filed May 1, 2017. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/583,786, filed May 1, 2017. |
International Patent Application Serial No. PCT/CN2017/083143 filed May 5, 2017. |
“Fair Billing with Automatic Dimensioning” pp. 1-4, undated, Copyright Mettler—Toledo International Inc. |
“Plane Detection in Point Cloud Data” dated Jan. 25, 2010 by Michael Ying Yang and Wolfgang Forstner, Technical Report 1, 2010, University of Bonn. |
“Swift Dimension” Trademark Omniplanar, Copyright 2014. |
Ajmal S. Mian et al., “Three-Dimensional Model Based Object Recognition and Segmentation in Cluttered Scenes”, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 28, No. 10, Oct. 2006. |
Batalin et al., “Mobile robot navigation using a sensor network,” IEEE, International Conference on robotics and automation, Apr. 26, May 1, 2004, pp. 636-641. |
Bazazian et al., “Fast and Robust Edge Extraction in Unorganized Point clouds,” IEEE, 2015 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applicatoins (DICTA), Nov. 23-25, 2015, pp. 1-8. |
Biswas et al. “Depth Camera Based Indoor Mobile Robot Localization and Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2012. |
Bristow et al., “A Survey of Iterative Learning Control”, IEEE Control Systems, Jun. 2006, pp. 96-114. |
Buenaposada et al. “Realtime tracking and estimation of plane pose” Proceedings of the ICPR (Aug. 2002) vol. II, IEEE pp. 697-700. |
Carreira et al., “Enhanced PCA-based localization using depth maps with missing data,” IEEE, pp. 1-8, Apr. 24, 2013. |
Chen et al. “Improving Octree-Based Occupancy Maps Using Environment Sparsity with Application to Aerial Robot Navigation” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, pp. 3656-3663, 2017. |
Cleveland Jonas et al: “Automated System for Semantic Object Labeling with Soft-Object Recognition and Dynamic Programming Segmentation”, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY (Apr. 1, 2017). |
Cook et al., “Distributed Ray Tracing ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics”, vol. 18, No. 3, ACM pp. 137-145, 1984. |
Datta, A., et al. “Accurate camera calibration using iterative refinement of control points,” in Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009. |
Deschaud, et al., “A Fast and Accurate Place Detection algoritm for large noisy point clouds using filtered normals and voxel growing,” 3DPVT, May 2010, Paris, France. [hal-01097361]. |
Douillard, Bertrand, et al. “On the segmentation of 3D LIDAR point clouds.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on IEEE, 2011. |
Dubois, M., et al., A comparison of geometric and energy-based point cloud semantic segmentation methods, European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), p. 88-93, 25-27, Sep. 2013. |
Duda, et al., “Use of the Hough Transformation to Detect Lines and Curves in Pictures”, Stanford Research Institute, Menlo Park, California, Graphics and Image Processing, Communications of the ACM, vol. 15, No. 1 (Jan. 1972). |
F.C.A. Groen et al., “The smallest box around a package,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 14, No. 1-6, Jan. 1, 1981, pp. 173-176, XP055237156, GB, ISSN: 0031-3203, DOI: 10.1016/0031-3203(81(90059-5 p. 176-p. 178. |
Federico Tombari et al. “Multimodal cue integration through Hypotheses Verification for RGB-D object recognition and 6DOF pose estimation”, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Jan. 2013. |
Flores, et al., “Removing Pedestrians from Google Street View Images”, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference On, IEE, Piscataway, NJ, pp. 53-58 (Jun. 13, 2010). |
Glassner, “Space Subdivision for Fast Ray Tracing.” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 4.10, pp. 15-24, 1984. |
Golovinskiy, Aleksey, et al. “Min-Cut based segmentation of point clouds.” Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on. IEEE, 2009. |
Hackel et al., “Contour Detection in unstructured 3D point clouds,” IEEE, 2016 Conference on Computer vision and Pattern recognition (CVPR), Jun. 27-30, 2016, pp. 1-9. |
Hao et al., “Structure-based object detection from scene point clouds,” Science Direct, v191, pp. 148-160 (2016). |
Hu et al., “An improved method of discrete point cloud filtering based on complex environment,” International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, v48, i18 (2013). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2016/064110 dated Mar. 20, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/024847 dated Jul. 7, 2017. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/025859 dated Jul. 3, 2019. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030345 dated Sep. 17, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030360 dated Jul. 9, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2018/030363 dated Jul. 9, 2018. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/025849 dated Jul. 9, 2019. |
Jadhav et al. “Survey on Spatial Domain dynamic template matching technique for scanning linear barcode,” International Journal of scieve and research v 5 n 3, Mar. 2016)(Year: 2016). |
Jian Fan et al: “Shelf detection via vanishing point and radial projection”, 2014 IEEE International Conference on image processing (ICIP), IEEE, (Oct. 27, 2014), pp. 1575-1578. |
Kay et al. “Ray Tracing Complex Scenes.” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 20, No. 4, ACM, pp. 269-278, 1986. |
Kelly et al., “Reactive Nonholonoic Trajectory Generation via Parametric Optimal Control”, International Journal of Robotics Research, vot. 22, No. 7-8, pp. 583-601 (Jul. 30, 2013). |
Lari, Z., et al., “An adaptive approach for segmentation of 3D laser point cloud.” International Archives of the Photogrammertry, Remote sensing and spatial information Sciences, vol. XXXVIII-5/W12, 2011, ISPRS Calgary 2011 Workshop, Aug. 29-31, 2011, Calgary, Canada. |
Lecking et al: “Localization in a wide range of industrial environments using relative 3D ceiling features”, IEEE, pp. 333-337 (Sep. 15, 2008). |
Lee et al. “Statistically Optimized Sampling for Distributed Ray Tracing.” ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, vol. 19, No. 3, ACM, pp. 61-67, 1985. |
Li et al., “An improved RANSAC for 3D Point cloud plane segmentation based on normal distribution transformation cells,” Remote sensing, V9: 433, pp. 1-16 (2017). |
Likhachev, Maxim, and Dave Ferguson. “Planning Long dynamically feasible maneuvers for autonomous vehicles.” The international journal of Robotics Reasearch 28.8 (2009): 933-945. (Year:2009). |
Marder-Eppstein et al., “The Office Marathon: robust navigation in an indoor office environment,” IEEE, 2010 International conference on robotics and automation, May 3-7, 2010, pp. 300-307. |
McNaughton, Matthew, et al. “Motion planning for autonomous driving with a conformal spatiotemporal lattice.” Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2011. (Year: 2011). |
Mitra et al., “Estimating surface normals in noisy point cloud data,” International Journal of Computational geometry & applications, Jun. 8-10, 2003, pp. 322-328. |
N.D.F. Campbell et al. “Automatic 3D Object Segmentation in Multiple Views using Volumetric Graph-Cuts”, Journal of Image and Vision Computing, vol. 28, Issue 1, Jan. 2010, pp. 14-25. |
Ni et al., “Edge Detection and Feature Line Tracing in 3D-Point Clouds by Analyzing Geometric Properties of Neighborhoods,” Remote Sensing, V8 I9, pp. 1-20 (2016). |
Norriof et al., “Experimental comparison of some classical iterative learning control algorithms”, IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Jun. 2002, pp. 636-641. |
Olson, Clark F., et al. “Wide-Baseline Stereo Vision for terrain Mapping” in Machine Vision and Applications, Aug. 2010. |
Oriolo et al., “An iterative learning controller for nonholonomic mobile Robots”, the international Journal of Robotics Research, Aug. 1997, pp. 954-970. |
Ostafew et al., “Visual Teach and Repeat, Repeat, Repeat: Iterative learning control to improve mobile robot path tracking in challenging outdoor environment”, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent robots and Systems, Nov. 2013, pp. 176-181. |
Park et al., “Autonomous mobile robot navigation using passive RFID in indoor environment,” IEEE, Transactions on industrial electronics, vol. 56, issue 7, pp. 2366-2373 (Jul. 2009). |
Perveen et al. (An overview of template matching methodologies and its application, International Journal of Research in Computer and Communication Tenology, v2n10, Oct. 2013) (Year: 2013). |
Pivtoraiko et al., “Differentially constrained mobile robot motion planning in state lattices”, journal of field robotics, vol. 26, No. 3, 2009, pp. 308-333. |
Pratt W K Ed: “Digital Image processing, 10-image enhacement, 17-image segmentation”, Jan. 1, 2001, Digital Image Processing: PIKS Inside, New York: John Wily & Sons, US, pp. 243-258, 551. |
Puwein, J., et al.“Robust Multi-view camera calibration for wide-baseline camera networks,” in IEEE Workshop on Applications of computer vision (WACV), Jan. 2011. |
Rusu, et al. “How to invrementally register pairs of clouds,” PCL Library, retrieved from internet on Aug. 22, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/pairwise_incremental_registration.php]. |
Rusu, et al. “Spatial Change detection on unorganized point cloud data,” PCL Library, retrieved from internet on Aug. 19, 2016 [http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/octree_change.php]. |
Schnabel et al. “Efficient RANSAC for Point-Cloud Shape Detection”, vol. 0, No. 0, pp. 1-12 (1981). |
Szeliski, “Modified Hough Transform”, Computer Vision. Copyright 2011, pp. 251-254. Retrieved on Aug. 17, 2017 [http://szeliski.org/book/drafts/SzeliskiBook_20100903_draft.pdf]. |
Tahir, Rabbani, et al., “Segmentation of point clouds using smoothness constraint,” International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36.5 (Sep. 2006): 248-253. |
Trevor et al., “Tables, Counters, and Shelves: Semantic Mapping of Surfaces in 3D,” Retrieved from Internet Jul. 3, 2018 @ http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.703.5365&rep=rep1&type=pdf, pp. 1-6. |
United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office, “Combined Search and Examination Report” for GB Patent Application No. 1813580.6 dated Feb. 21, 2019. |
Varol Gul et al: “Product placement detection based on image processing”, 2014 22nd Signal Processing and Communication Applications Conference (SIU), IEEE, Apr. 23, 2014. |
Varol Gul et al: “Toward Retail product recognition on Grocery shelves”, Visual Communications and image processing; Jan. 20, 2004; San Jose, (Mar. 4, 2015). |
Weber et al., “Methods for Feature Detection in Point clouds,” visualization of large and unstructured data sets—IRTG Workshop, pp. 90-99 (2010). |
Zhao Zhou et al.: “An Image contrast Enhancement Algorithm Using PLIP-based histogram Modification”, 2017 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCON), IEEE, (Jun. 21, 2017). |
Ziang Xie et al., “Multimodal Blending for High-Accuracy Instance Recognition”, 2013 IEEE RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, p. 2214-2221. |
Kang et al., “Kinematic Path-Tracking of Mobile Robot Using Iterative learning Control”, Journal of Robotic Systems, 2005, pp. 111-121. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion from International Patent Application No. PCT/US2019/064020 dated Feb. 19, 2020. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2019/025870 dated Jun. 21, 2019. |
Kim, et al. “Robust approach to reconstructing transparent objects using a time-of-flight depth camera”, Optics Express, vol. 25, No. 3; Published Feb. 6, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180315065 A1 | Nov 2018 | US |