The present invention relates generally to electronic commerce, and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for facilitating user selection of item categories in an online auction environment.
The fundamental changes brought by the Internet and its subset, the World Wide Web (“Web”), have created a new electronic environment that is changing the way business is transacted. The ongoing revolution in the field of information delivery is driving the progress in various areas of everyday life. One area that has benefited from this technological development is the electronic auction area, which reflects the ability of individuals to sell items within an Internet marketplace environment.
Historically, auctions for sale of various items have proven to be very popular. Electronic auctions are also becoming increasingly popular due to their lack of complexity and ease of access. In an electronic auction environment, users connect to servers supporting the auctions and buy and/or sell items over one or more networks, for example including the Internet. Typically, in order to list the items in an efficient manner and to attract buyers, the seller has to specify the name of the item to be auctioned, a short description of the item, and a listing category. Since electronic auctions support an ever-increasing number of users selling a wide array of items, attempts have been made to design efficient interfaces between the users and the companies operating the auctions.
With respect to the category selection process, one previous approach uses a field, which includes all categories, and separate fields for respective subcategories. The user selects an appropriate category and then browses through subcategories until he or she finds the subcategory corresponding to the item to be auctioned. However, the process of browsing through subcategories is time-consuming. Also, the user has to repeat the process for every item that the user intends to auction. Another approach prompts the user to select a category from a listing displayed on a Web page, then a subcategory from a second listing displayed on a subsequent Web page, then a further subcategory, if available, from a third listing displayed in yet another Web page, until the final selection accurately characterizes the item to be auctioned. This approach is also time-consuming and requires a certain amount of effort to be completed.
What is needed is a method for facilitating user selection of an item category that is efficient and easy to use.
A method and apparatus are disclosed for facilitating category selection by a user in a computerized auction. A category field is provided, containing a plurality of category entries used to categorize an item in the auction. One category entry is selected in the category field and at least one subcategory field is provided, containing a plurality of subcategory entries also used to categorize the item in the auction, the subcategory entries corresponding to the one selected category entry of the plurality of category entries. At least one subcategory entry corresponding to the one selected category entry is further selected in the at least one subcategory field for further processing.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings, and from the detailed description, which follow below.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:
a illustrates an exemplary table in the auction database, which stores item categories and subcategories.
b illustrates an exemplary table in the auction database, which stores identification parameters for each category or subcategory.
FIGS. 8A-8J2 illustrate an embodiment of the present invention implemented in Javascript language.
A method and apparatus for facilitating user selection of an item category for an online auction is described. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details.
Referring now to
Using one of a variety of network connection devices, server computer 100 can also communicate directly with client 150. In a particular implementation of this network configuration, a server computer 100 may operate as a web server if the World Wide Web (Web) portion of the Internet is used as wide-area network 110. Using the HTTP protocol and the HTML coding language across a network, web server 100 may communicate across the Web with client 150. In this configuration, client 150 uses a client application program known as a web browser, such as the Netscape™ Navigator™ browser, published by Netscape Corporation of Mountain View, Calif., the Internet Explorer™ browser, published by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., the user interface of America On-Line™, or the web browser or HTML translator of any other conventional supplier. Using such conventional browsers and the Web, client 150 may access graphical and textual data or video, audio, or tactile data provided by server 100. Conventional means exist by which client 150 may supply information to web server 100 through the Web 110 and the web server 100 may return processed data to client 150.
Having briefly described one embodiment of the network environment in which the present invention operates,
An optional data storage device 207, such as a magnetic disk or optical disk, and its corresponding drive may also be coupled to computer system 200 for storing information and instructions. System bus 201 is coupled to an external bus 210, which connects computer system 200 to other devices. Computer system 200 can also be coupled via bus 210 to a display device 221, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or a liquid crystal display (LCD), for displaying information to a computer user. For example, graphical or textual information may be presented to the user on display device 221. Typically, an alphanumeric input device 222, such as a keyboard including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to bus 210 for communicating information and/or command selections to processor 202. Another type of user input device is cursor control device 223, such as a conventional mouse, touch mouse, trackball, or other type of cursor direction keys, for communicating direction information and command selection to processor 202 and for controlling cursor movement on display 221. A fully loaded computer system may optionally include video, camera, speakers, sound card, and many other similar conventional options.
Alternatively, the client 150 can be implemented as a network computer or thin client device, such as the WebTV Networks™ Internet terminal or the Oracle™ NC. Client 150 may also be a laptop or palm-top computing device, such as the Palm Pilot™. Such a network computer or thin client device does not necessarily include all of the devices and features of the above-described exemplary computer system. However, the functionality of the present invention may nevertheless be implemented with such devices.
A communication device 224 is also coupled to bus 210 for accessing remote computers or servers, such as web server 100, or other servers via the Internet, for example. The communication device 224 may include a modem, a network interface card, or other well known interface devices, such as those used for interfacing with Ethernet, Token-ring, or other types of networks. In any event, in this manner, the computer system 200 may be coupled to a number of servers 100 via a conventional network infrastructure such as the infrastructure illustrated in
The present invention includes various processing steps, which will be described below. The steps of the present invention may be embodied in machine or computer executable instructions. The instructions can be used to cause a general purpose or special purpose processor, which is programmed with the instructions to perform the steps of the present invention. Alternatively, the steps of the present invention may be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components. While embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the Web, the method and apparatus described herein is equally applicable to other network infrastructures or other data communications systems.
Referring now to
Generally, the present invention provides a method and apparatus for facilitating user selection of item categories in an online auction, made accessible across a wide-area network 320, such as the Internet. Referring again to
According to one embodiment of the present invention, items being the object of an online auction are classified in categories and subcategories. As illustrated in
In one embodiment, the client browser 336 receives the category and subcategory information and displays the information hierarchically in graphically distinct areas, as shown in
The category selection process is implemented using the client browser 336 and the server application 312. In one embodiment, the client browser 336 and the server application 312 operate for facilitating category selection by the user as shown in
If the category number or numeric I.D. is not available, then, at step 430, the user selects a category from a list of available categories displayed in an interactive category area. Next, the client browser 336 performs a test whether the selected category has related subcategories at step 440. If the selected category has no related subcategories, then the user has the option to record the category number of the selected category at step 445 and may proceed further with the item registration process. Alternatively, if related subcategories exist, the user selects a subcategory from a list of available subcategories related to the selected category at step 450. The list of available subcategories is displayed in an interactive area adjacent to the category area. A test whether the subcategory has no further related subcategories is performed by the client browser at step 460. If no further related subcategories exist, then the user may record the category number of the selected combination of category and subcategory at step 470 and proceed further with the item registration process. Otherwise, if further subcategories related to the selected subcategory are still available, the user goes back to step 450 and repeats the subcategory selection process. The embodiment described above allows the client browser 336 to perform the category selection process using category data and Javascript code supplied by the server application 312. Alternatively, the server application 312 may interact with the user during the selection process and may perform other functions as described in further detail below.
If the category number is not available, then the server application 312 receives a category selection from the client application 332 at step 540. At step 550, a test whether the category has any subcategories is performed. The server application 312 accesses the database 318 and determines if related subcategories exist. If no subcategories exist for the selected category, the server application 312 retrieves and returns the category number to the client application 332, the category number being displayed to the user at step 555. If the selected category has related subcategories, the server application 312 retrieves the subcategories from database 318 and forwards the information to the client application 332. The subcategories are then displayed at step 560. Once the user selects a subcategory, the server application 312 receives the subcategory selection at step 570, and subsequently accesses the database 318 at step 580 to determine if the selected subcategory has any further subcategories. If no further subcategories exist, the server application 312 retrieves and returns the category number to the client application 332, the category number being displayed to the user at step 585. Alternatively, if the selected subcategory has a new set of subcategories, steps 560 and 570 are repeated for the new set of subcategories.
Thus, a method and apparatus for facilitating user selection of item categories in an online auction has been described. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/491,703 filed Jan. 26, 2000, which application is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3573747 | Adams et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
3581072 | Nymeyer | May 1971 | A |
4412287 | Braddock, III | Oct 1983 | A |
4674044 | Kalmus et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4677552 | Sibley, Jr. | Jun 1987 | A |
4789928 | Fujisaki | Dec 1988 | A |
4799156 | Shavit et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4823265 | Nelson | Apr 1989 | A |
4864516 | Gaither et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4903201 | Wagner | Feb 1990 | A |
4990005 | Karakawa | Feb 1991 | A |
5063507 | Lindsey et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5077665 | Silverman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5101353 | Lupien et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5136501 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5168446 | Wiseman | Dec 1992 | A |
5205200 | Wright | Apr 1993 | A |
5243515 | Lee | Sep 1993 | A |
5258908 | Hartheimer et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5280422 | Moe et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5297031 | Gutterman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297032 | Trojan et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5305200 | Hartheimer et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5325297 | Bird et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5329589 | Fraser et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5375055 | Togher et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394324 | Clearwater | Feb 1995 | A |
5426281 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5485510 | Colbert | Jan 1996 | A |
5546575 | Potter et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5553145 | Micali | Sep 1996 | A |
5557728 | Garrett et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5596994 | Bro | Jan 1997 | A |
5598557 | Doner et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5640569 | Miller et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5657389 | Houvener | Aug 1997 | A |
5664115 | Fraser | Sep 1997 | A |
5689652 | Lupien et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694546 | Reisman | Dec 1997 | A |
5706457 | Dwyer et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710889 | Clark et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715314 | Payne et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715402 | Popolo | Feb 1998 | A |
5715444 | Danish et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5717989 | Tozzoli et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721832 | Westrope | Feb 1998 | A |
5722418 | Bro | Mar 1998 | A |
5727165 | Ordish et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742768 | Gennaro et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5771291 | Newton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771380 | Tanaka et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790790 | Smith et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794219 | Brown | Aug 1998 | A |
5799285 | Klingman | Aug 1998 | A |
5803500 | Mossberg | Sep 1998 | A |
5818914 | Fujisaki | Oct 1998 | A |
5826244 | Huberman | Oct 1998 | A |
5835896 | Fisher et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845255 | Mayaud | Dec 1998 | A |
5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
5845266 | Lupien et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848399 | Burke | Dec 1998 | A |
5850442 | Muftic | Dec 1998 | A |
5872848 | Romney et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873069 | Reuhl et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874412 | Priebe et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884056 | Steele | Mar 1999 | A |
5890138 | Godin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5905974 | Fraser et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905975 | Ausubel | May 1999 | A |
5922074 | Richard et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924072 | Havens | Jul 1999 | A |
5926794 | Fethe | Jul 1999 | A |
5968110 | Westrope | Oct 1999 | A |
5983219 | Danish et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991739 | Cupps et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6035288 | Solomon | Mar 2000 | A |
6035402 | Vaeth et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044363 | Mori et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047264 | Fisher et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055518 | Franklin et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058417 | Hess et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061448 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6073117 | Oyanagi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085176 | Woolston | Jul 2000 | A |
6104815 | Alcorn et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6119137 | Smith et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6167382 | Sparks et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178408 | Copple et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6192407 | Smith et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6202051 | Woolston | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236400 | Guerrero | May 2001 | B1 |
6243691 | Fisher et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256028 | Sanford et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266514 | O'Donnell | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275821 | Danish et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6307573 | Barros | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6356899 | Chakrabarti et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6397221 | Greef et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405175 | Ng | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6449601 | Friedland et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6462762 | Ku et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466918 | Spiegel et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6489968 | Ortega et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6496843 | Getchius et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6518984 | Maeckel et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6901403 | Bata et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6934690 | Van Horn et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7035864 | Ferrari et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7191147 | Heene et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7398229 | Budish | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7839385 | Hunleth et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8082184 | Yruski et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8549407 | O'Neil | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8670993 | Henley | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8781940 | Poon | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20020062265 | Poon | May 2002 | A1 |
20020138481 | Aggarwal et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030041004 | Parry et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030061122 | Berkowitz et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065737 | Aasman | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040153371 | Razumov | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040254853 | Heene et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050071251 | Linden et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050216362 | Navar et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050273417 | Budish | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060085253 | Mengerink et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060167760 | Chakraborty et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060173742 | Heene | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070073591 | Perry et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080091553 | Koski | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080120291 | Delgo et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090150791 | Garcia et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090248635 | Gross | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110029403 | Xu | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20130013440 | Raghavan | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130125236 | Lalonde et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130268561 | Christie et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290125 | Raghavan | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140040753 | Garcia | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140142973 | Henley | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2253543 | Mar 1997 | CA |
2658635 | Aug 1991 | FR |
9300266 | Sep 1994 | NL |
WO-9215174 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO-9517711 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9634356 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9737315 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-9963461 | Dec 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Appeal Brief filed Jan. 2, 2013”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703 , Response filed Oct. 1, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Advisory Action mailed Jun. 17, 2008”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Appeal Brief filed Sep. 29, 2008”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Appeal Decision mailed Nov. 25, 2013”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2008”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 4, 2002”, 44 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Final Office Action mailed May 31, 2006”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2012”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2001”, 31 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2011”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 26, 2006”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 27, 2007”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 14, 2001”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2007”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2001”, 43 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Jun. 26, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 11, 2002”, 45 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 14, 2001”, 28 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Mar. 12, 2002 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2001”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Mar. 20, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 26, 2006”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed May 27, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2008”, 14 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed May 29, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 27, 2007”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed May 4, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2012”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Jul. 13, 2001 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 14, 2001”, 39 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Jul. 27, 2005 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 28, 2005”, 18 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Nov. 30, 2006 to Final Office Action mailed May 31, 2006”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Dec. 11, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2007”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 28, 2005”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Supplemental Appeal Brief filed Sep. 8, 2009”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Advisory Action mailed Jan. 7, 2010”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Advisory Action mailed Nov. 20, 2003”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Appeal Brief filed Feb. 5, 2010”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Appeal Brief filed Feb. 15, 2006”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Appeal Brief filed Apr. 11, 2005”, 21 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Appeal Brief filed May 18, 2007”, 27 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Appeal Brief filed Sep. 25, 2006”, 25 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed Apr. 15, 2010”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2003”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 1, 2004”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 20, 2003”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Non Final Office Action mailed May 25, 2006”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2004”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 1, 2005”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Preliminary Amendment filed Jul. 3, 2002”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Reply Brief filed Jun. 15, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Reply Brief filed Nov. 8, 2007”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Response filed Feb. 10, 2009 to Examiner's Answer mailed Dec. 10, 2008”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Response filed Jun. 3, 2003 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 20, 2003”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Response filed Aug. 17, 2004 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2004”, 12 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Response filed Sep. 25, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 25, 2006”, 19 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Response filed Nov. 3, 2003 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2003”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Advisory Action mailed Aug. 25, 2011”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 9, 2011”, 26 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2010”, 23 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 4, 2013”, 24 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Response filed Mar. 30, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2010”, 17 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Response filed Sep. 8, 2011 to Advisory Action mailed Aug. 25, 2011”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Response to Final Office Action Mailed Jun. 9, 2011”, 13 pgs. |
“Onsale Joins Fray as Online Shopping Picks Up Speed: Internet Booms”, Computer Reseller News, CMP Publications, Inc., USA, (Jun. 5, 1995), 1 pg. |
“Onsale: Onsale Brings Thrill of Auctions and Bargain Hunting Online; Unique Internet retail service debuts with week-long charity auction for the Computer Museum in Boston”, Business Wire, Dialog Web. 0489267 BW0022, (May 24, 1995), 3 pgs. |
“Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,275,821 mailed Oct. 28, 2008”, 36 pgs. |
Baumann, G. W, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, (Jan. 1995), 83-84. |
Clemons, E., “Evaluating the prospects for alternative electronic securities”, Proceedings of ICIS 91: 12th International Conference on Information Systems, (Dec. 16-18, 1991), 53-63. |
Downing, D. A, et al., “Dictionary of Computer and Internet Terms”, Sixth Edition, (1998), 175-177, 383-384. |
Graham, Ian, “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe”, Electronic Markets. vol. 8, No. 2, (1998), 29-32. |
Granacki, J., et al., “A Component Library Management System and Browser, Research Report ISI/RR-93-386”, University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute, (Apr. 1993), p. 1-19. |
Hauser, R., “Anonymous Delivery of Goods in Electronic Commerce”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 39(3), (Mar. 1996), 363-366. |
Hess, C. M, et al., “Computerized Loan Organization System: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 18(3), (Sep. 1994), 251-275. |
Klein, Stefan, “Introduction to Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 3-6. |
Lee, H. G, “Electronic brokerage and electronic auction: the impact of IT on market structures”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, (1996), 397-406. |
Lee, Ho Geun, “AUCNET: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions”, Focus Theme, Electronic Markets, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 24-28. |
Malone, T., et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 30, No. 6, (Jun. 1987), 484-497. |
Mardesich, Jodi, “Site Offers Clearance for End-of-Life Products—Onsale Takes Auction Gavel Electronic”, Computer Reseller News, (Jul. 8, 1996), 2 pps. |
Massimb, Marcel, “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity”, Financial Analysts Journal, 50(1), (Jan./Feb. 1994), 39-50. |
Meade, J., “Visual 360: A Performance Appraisal System That's ‘Fun’”, HR Magazine, Society for Human Resource Management., (Jul. 1999), 3 pgs. |
Neo, B. S, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems; vol. 1(5), (Dec. 1992), 278-288. |
Post, D. L, et al., “Application of auctions as a pricing mechanism for the interchange of electric power”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10(3), (Aug. 1995), 1580-1584. |
Preist, Chris, et al., “Adaptive Agents in a Persistent Shout Double Auction”, International Conference on Information and Computation Economies, Proceedings of the first international conference on Information and computation economies, (1998), 11-18. |
Reck, M., “Formally Specifying an Automated Trade Execution System”, The Journal of Systems and Software, 1993, Elsevier Science Publishing, USA, (1993), 245-252. |
Reck, Martin, “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 17-23. |
Resnick, Paul, “Reputation systems”, Communications of the ACM, 43(12), (Dec. 2000), 45-48. |
Rockoff, T. E, et al., “Design of an Internet-based system for remote Dutch auctions”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, vol. 5(4), (Jan. 1, 1995), 10-16. |
Schmid, B. F, “The Development of Electronic Commerce”, EM—Electronic Markets, No. 9-10, (Oct. 1993), 2 pgs. |
Siegmann, Ken, “Nowhere to go but up”, PC Week; vol. 12(42), Ziff-Davis Publishing Company, (Oct. 23, 1995), 1-3. |
Tjostheim, Ingvar, et al., “A case study of an on-line auction for the World Wide Web”, Norwegian Computing Center (NR), [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.nr.no/˜ingvar/enter98.html>, (Accessed Feb. 21, 2005), 1-10. |
Turban, Efraim, “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment”, Focus Theme, EM—Electronic Markets, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 7-11. |
Van Heck, E., et al., “Experiences with Electronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry”, Focus Theme, Erasmus University, The Netherlands, (1996), 6 pgs. |
Warbelow, A, et al., “Aucnet: TV Auction Network System”, Harvard Business School Case/Study, HBVR#9-190-001, USA, (Jul. 1989), 1-16. |
Zwass, V., “Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Fall 1996, vol. 1, No. 1, (Fall 1996), 3-23. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140325453 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09491703 | Jan 2000 | US |
Child | 14218425 | US |