Method and apparatus for facilitating user selection of an item category in an online auction

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9058094
  • Patent Number
    9,058,094
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 18, 2014
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 16, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus are disclosed for facilitating category selection by a user in a computerized auction. A category field is provided, containing a plurality of category entries used to categorize an item in the auction. One category entry is selected in the category field and at least one subcategory field is provided, containing a plurality of subcategory entries also used to categorize the item in the auction, the subcategory entries corresponding to the one selected category entry of the plurality of category entries. At least one subcategory entry corresponding to the one selected category entry is further selected in the at least one subcategory field for further processing.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to electronic commerce, and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for facilitating user selection of item categories in an online auction environment.


BACKGROUND OF THE ART

The fundamental changes brought by the Internet and its subset, the World Wide Web (“Web”), have created a new electronic environment that is changing the way business is transacted. The ongoing revolution in the field of information delivery is driving the progress in various areas of everyday life. One area that has benefited from this technological development is the electronic auction area, which reflects the ability of individuals to sell items within an Internet marketplace environment.


Historically, auctions for sale of various items have proven to be very popular. Electronic auctions are also becoming increasingly popular due to their lack of complexity and ease of access. In an electronic auction environment, users connect to servers supporting the auctions and buy and/or sell items over one or more networks, for example including the Internet. Typically, in order to list the items in an efficient manner and to attract buyers, the seller has to specify the name of the item to be auctioned, a short description of the item, and a listing category. Since electronic auctions support an ever-increasing number of users selling a wide array of items, attempts have been made to design efficient interfaces between the users and the companies operating the auctions.


With respect to the category selection process, one previous approach uses a field, which includes all categories, and separate fields for respective subcategories. The user selects an appropriate category and then browses through subcategories until he or she finds the subcategory corresponding to the item to be auctioned. However, the process of browsing through subcategories is time-consuming. Also, the user has to repeat the process for every item that the user intends to auction. Another approach prompts the user to select a category from a listing displayed on a Web page, then a subcategory from a second listing displayed on a subsequent Web page, then a further subcategory, if available, from a third listing displayed in yet another Web page, until the final selection accurately characterizes the item to be auctioned. This approach is also time-consuming and requires a certain amount of effort to be completed.


What is needed is a method for facilitating user selection of an item category that is efficient and easy to use.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method and apparatus are disclosed for facilitating category selection by a user in a computerized auction. A category field is provided, containing a plurality of category entries used to categorize an item in the auction. One category entry is selected in the category field and at least one subcategory field is provided, containing a plurality of subcategory entries also used to categorize the item in the auction, the subcategory entries corresponding to the one selected category entry of the plurality of category entries. At least one subcategory entry corresponding to the one selected category entry is further selected in the at least one subcategory field for further processing.


Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the accompanying drawings, and from the detailed description, which follow below.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings, in which like references indicate similar elements and in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates a prior art computer network topology.



FIG. 2 illustrates the prior art architecture of a conventional computer system.



FIG. 3 illustrates the computer network architecture of one embodiment.



FIG. 4 is a flowchart representing the process of selecting an item category in an online auction from a user's perspective.



FIG. 5 is a flowchart representing the process of selecting an item category in an online auction from a server's perspective.



FIG. 6
a illustrates an exemplary table in the auction database, which stores item categories and subcategories.



FIG. 6
b illustrates an exemplary table in the auction database, which stores identification parameters for each category or subcategory.



FIG. 7 illustrates one embodiment of a user interface used in the process of selecting a item category in an online auction.


FIGS. 8A-8J2 illustrate an embodiment of the present invention implemented in Javascript language.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A method and apparatus for facilitating user selection of an item category for an online auction is described. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details.


Referring now to FIG. 1, a diagram illustrates the network environment in which the present invention operates. In this conventional network architecture, a server computer system 100 is coupled to a network 110, preferably a wide-area network. Wide-area network 110 includes the Internet, or other proprietary networks, such as America On-Line™, CompuServe™, Microsoft Network™, and Prodigy™, each of which are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Wide-area network 110 may also include conventional network backbones, long-haul telephone lines, Internet service providers, various levels of network routers, and other conventional means for routing data between computers. Using conventional network protocols, server 100 may communicate through wide-area network 110 to a plurality of client computer systems 120, 130, 140, 150, possibly connected through wide-area network 110 in various ways or directly connected to server 100. For example, as shown in FIG. 1, client 140 is connected directly to wide-area network 110 through direct or dial-up telephone or other network transmission line. Alternatively, client 130 may be connected to wide-area network 110 through a conventional modem pool 114. The modem pool 114 allows a plurality of client systems to connect with a smaller set of modems in modem pool 114 for connection through wide-area network 110. Those of ordinary skill in the art will understand that a plurality of clients, similar to client 130, may be connected to network 110 using the modem pool 114. Client 150 may also be connected directly to server 100, as shown in FIG. 1, or through a modem (not shown) in a conventional way. In another alternative network typology, wide-area network 110 is connected to a gateway computer 112. Gateway computer 112 is used to route data to client 120 through a local area network (LAN) 116. In this manner, client 120 can communicate with other clients (not shown) through LAN 116 or with server 100 through gateway 112 and wide-area network 110. Alternatively, LAN 116 may be directly connected to server 100.


Using one of a variety of network connection devices, server computer 100 can also communicate directly with client 150. In a particular implementation of this network configuration, a server computer 100 may operate as a web server if the World Wide Web (Web) portion of the Internet is used as wide-area network 110. Using the HTTP protocol and the HTML coding language across a network, web server 100 may communicate across the Web with client 150. In this configuration, client 150 uses a client application program known as a web browser, such as the Netscape™ Navigator™ browser, published by Netscape Corporation of Mountain View, Calif., the Internet Explorer™ browser, published by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash., the user interface of America On-Line™, or the web browser or HTML translator of any other conventional supplier. Using such conventional browsers and the Web, client 150 may access graphical and textual data or video, audio, or tactile data provided by server 100. Conventional means exist by which client 150 may supply information to web server 100 through the Web 110 and the web server 100 may return processed data to client 150.


Having briefly described one embodiment of the network environment in which the present invention operates, FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a computer system 200 illustrating an exemplary client 150 or server 100 computer system in which the features of the present invention may be implemented. Computer system 200 is comprised of a system bus 201, or other communications module similar to the system bus, for communicating information, and a processing module, such as processor 202, coupled with bus 201 for processing information. Computer system 200 further comprises a main memory 204, such as a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device, coupled to bus 201, for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 202. Main memory 204 may also be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions by processor 202. Computer system 200 also comprises a read only memory (ROM) 206, and/or other similar static storage device, coupled to bus 201, for storing static information and instructions for processor 202.


An optional data storage device 207, such as a magnetic disk or optical disk, and its corresponding drive may also be coupled to computer system 200 for storing information and instructions. System bus 201 is coupled to an external bus 210, which connects computer system 200 to other devices. Computer system 200 can also be coupled via bus 210 to a display device 221, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or a liquid crystal display (LCD), for displaying information to a computer user. For example, graphical or textual information may be presented to the user on display device 221. Typically, an alphanumeric input device 222, such as a keyboard including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to bus 210 for communicating information and/or command selections to processor 202. Another type of user input device is cursor control device 223, such as a conventional mouse, touch mouse, trackball, or other type of cursor direction keys, for communicating direction information and command selection to processor 202 and for controlling cursor movement on display 221. A fully loaded computer system may optionally include video, camera, speakers, sound card, and many other similar conventional options.


Alternatively, the client 150 can be implemented as a network computer or thin client device, such as the WebTV Networks™ Internet terminal or the Oracle™ NC. Client 150 may also be a laptop or palm-top computing device, such as the Palm Pilot™. Such a network computer or thin client device does not necessarily include all of the devices and features of the above-described exemplary computer system. However, the functionality of the present invention may nevertheless be implemented with such devices.


A communication device 224 is also coupled to bus 210 for accessing remote computers or servers, such as web server 100, or other servers via the Internet, for example. The communication device 224 may include a modem, a network interface card, or other well known interface devices, such as those used for interfacing with Ethernet, Token-ring, or other types of networks. In any event, in this manner, the computer system 200 may be coupled to a number of servers 100 via a conventional network infrastructure such as the infrastructure illustrated in FIG. 1 and described above.


The present invention includes various processing steps, which will be described below. The steps of the present invention may be embodied in machine or computer executable instructions. The instructions can be used to cause a general purpose or special purpose processor, which is programmed with the instructions to perform the steps of the present invention. Alternatively, the steps of the present invention may be performed by specific hardware components that contain hardwired logic for performing the steps, or by any combination of programmed computer components and custom hardware components. While embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the Web, the method and apparatus described herein is equally applicable to other network infrastructures or other data communications systems.


Referring now to FIG. 3, one embodiment of the network configuration of the present invention is illustrated. In one embodiment, a web server 310 is coupled with web client 330 through the wide-area network 320, such as the Internet. As described above, web server 310 and web client 330 may be implemented as conventional computer systems. Software application programs for implementing the present invention run on web server 310 and web client 330. As shown in FIG. 3, the server portion of the application software of the present invention is shown as server application 312. Also illustrated in FIG. 3 is the client side portion of the application software of the present invention, shown as client application 332. In addition, in one embodiment, web server 310 has access to a user database 318, or an information store, for storing and managing user information. As shown in FIG. 3, the user database 318 may be operated as a database system independent of, but accessible to, the web server 310 through a local area network (not shown) or other means of communication. Alternatively, user database 318 may be incorporated into web server 310.


Generally, the present invention provides a method and apparatus for facilitating user selection of item categories in an online auction, made accessible across a wide-area network 320, such as the Internet. Referring again to FIG. 3, the client application software 332 includes at least one basic functional component, shown in one embodiment as client browser 336, which contains display and category selection capabilities. One embodiment of the present invention is implemented in Javascript language as shown in FIGS. 8A-8J2.


According to one embodiment of the present invention, items being the object of an online auction are classified in categories and subcategories. As illustrated in FIG. 6a, each category is stored in a field 610 of a table 620 residing in database 318. Similarly, each subcategory resides in a different field 610 in the same database 318. The server application 312 accesses the table 620 in database 318 to retrieve and send stored category and subcategory information to the client application 332. As shown in FIG. 6b, each field 610 of one category or subcategory separately stores a category number or numeric I.D. of the category or subcategory, a name of the category or subcategory, a numeric I.D. of the parent category or subcategory, and two numeric I.D.s of categories or subcategories stored in adjacent fields.


In one embodiment, the client browser 336 receives the category and subcategory information and displays the information hierarchically in graphically distinct areas, as shown in FIG. 7. Each category is displayed in a category field 710. The category field 710 is a page mark-up language document and contains multiple categories, arranged in alphabetical order. In one embodiment, the category field 710 contains twelve categories. Alternatively, other categories may be included within the category field 710. Subcategories are displayed in several subcategory fields. A first subcategory field 720, a page mark-up language document similar to the category field, is adjacent to category field 710 and contains subcategories of each category displayed in field 710. In one embodiment, the number of subcategories is different for each displayed category. A second subcategory field 730 contains subcategories of each subcategory displayed in field 720. A third subcategory field 740 contains subcategories of each subcategory displayed in field 730. A category number associated with each category and its respective subcategories is also displayed by the browser 336. The category number enables the user to select the associated category and subcategories without going through the entire selection process as shown in detail below.


The category selection process is implemented using the client browser 336 and the server application 312. In one embodiment, the client browser 336 and the server application 312 operate for facilitating category selection by the user as shown in FIGS. 4 and 5 and described in further detail below.



FIG. 4 shows a flowchart representing the process of selecting an item category in an online auction from a user's perspective. Referring to FIG. 4, in one embodiment, the client browser 336 within the client application 332 receives category hierarchy data from the server application 312 at step 405. The category hierarchy data includes category and subcategory information. Using the category data, the client browser 336 performs the category selection process as follows. Once the user is ready to select an item category, at step 410, a decision is made whether a category number is available to the user. If the user has previously selected the same category and subcategories and has stored the category number associated with the category and the respective subcategories, the user enters the category number at step 420. As a result, based on the category number, the respective category and related subcategories are selected and displayed by the client browser 336 in the respective fields.


If the category number or numeric I.D. is not available, then, at step 430, the user selects a category from a list of available categories displayed in an interactive category area. Next, the client browser 336 performs a test whether the selected category has related subcategories at step 440. If the selected category has no related subcategories, then the user has the option to record the category number of the selected category at step 445 and may proceed further with the item registration process. Alternatively, if related subcategories exist, the user selects a subcategory from a list of available subcategories related to the selected category at step 450. The list of available subcategories is displayed in an interactive area adjacent to the category area. A test whether the subcategory has no further related subcategories is performed by the client browser at step 460. If no further related subcategories exist, then the user may record the category number of the selected combination of category and subcategory at step 470 and proceed further with the item registration process. Otherwise, if further subcategories related to the selected subcategory are still available, the user goes back to step 450 and repeats the subcategory selection process. The embodiment described above allows the client browser 336 to perform the category selection process using category data and Javascript code supplied by the server application 312. Alternatively, the server application 312 may interact with the user during the selection process and may perform other functions as described in further detail below.



FIG. 5 shows a flowchart representing an alternate embodiment of the process of selecting an item category in an online auction from the server's perspective. Referring to FIG. 5, a decision is made at step 510 whether a category number is available to the user. If the user has previously accessed the auction and has selected the same item category and subcategories, and a category number is available, then the server application 312 receives the category number at step 520. The server application 312 accesses the user database 318 and retrieves at step 530 the category information corresponding to the category number, as well as any related subcategories. The server application 312 subsequently forwards the information to the client application 332 and the category and subcategories are displayed for the user at step 535.


If the category number is not available, then the server application 312 receives a category selection from the client application 332 at step 540. At step 550, a test whether the category has any subcategories is performed. The server application 312 accesses the database 318 and determines if related subcategories exist. If no subcategories exist for the selected category, the server application 312 retrieves and returns the category number to the client application 332, the category number being displayed to the user at step 555. If the selected category has related subcategories, the server application 312 retrieves the subcategories from database 318 and forwards the information to the client application 332. The subcategories are then displayed at step 560. Once the user selects a subcategory, the server application 312 receives the subcategory selection at step 570, and subsequently accesses the database 318 at step 580 to determine if the selected subcategory has any further subcategories. If no further subcategories exist, the server application 312 retrieves and returns the category number to the client application 332, the category number being displayed to the user at step 585. Alternatively, if the selected subcategory has a new set of subcategories, steps 560 and 570 are repeated for the new set of subcategories.


Thus, a method and apparatus for facilitating user selection of item categories in an online auction has been described. Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments, it will be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: receiving an identifier;determining that the identifier is associated with a selection in a user interface of a combination of a category and a subcategory under which items included in listings in a networked marketplace environment are classified; andbased on the receiving of the identifier and the determining that the identifier is associated with the selection in the user interface of the combination of the category and the subcategory, automatically reselecting in the user interface the combination of the category and the subcategory, the receiving, determining and reselecting being performed by one or more processors.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining that the identifier is associated with the selection in the user interface of the combination of the category and the subcategory is based on the received identifier matching a stored identifier, the stored identifier having being previously associated with the selection in the user interface of the category and the subcategory.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further comprising, based on the reselecting in the user interface of the combination of the category and the subcategory, completing a registration of a listing of an item as being classified under the reselected category and subcategory.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the association of the stored identifier with the selection in the user interface of the category and subcategory is based on inputs received when information pertaining to categories and subcategories is represented in graphically distinct areas of the user interface.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the graphically distinct areas include a category area and one or more subcategory areas.
  • 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the information pertaining to the categories and subcategories is derived from database records corresponding to the categories and subcategories.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the database records include fields identifying categories or subcategories that are adjacent to other categories or other subcategories.
  • 8. A system comprising: one or more modules configured to, using one or more processors:receive an identifier;determine that the identifier is associated with a selection in a user interface of a combination of a category and a subcategory under which items included in listings in a networked marketplace environment are classified; andbased on the receiving of the identifier and the determining that the identifier is associated with the selection in the user interface of the combination of the category and the subcategory, automatically reselecting in the user interface the combination of the category and the subcategory.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the determining that the identifier is associated with the selection in the user interface of the combination of the category and the subcategory is based on the received identifier matching a stored identifier; the stored identifier having being previously associated with the selection in the user interface of the category and the subcategory.
  • 10. The system of claim 8, wherein the one or more modules are further configured to, based on the reselecting in the user interface of the combination of the category and the subcategory, completing a registration of a listing of an item as being classified under the reselected category and subcategory.
  • 11. The system of claim 8, wherein the association of the stored identifier with the selection in the user interface of the category and subcategory is based on inputs received when information pertaining to categories and subcategories is represented in graphically distinct areas of the user interface.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the graphically distinct areas include a category area and one or more subcategory areas.
  • 13. The system of claim 11, wherein the information pertaining to the categories and subcategories is derived from database records corresponding to the categories and subcategories.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the database records include fields identifying categories or subcategories that are adjacent to other categories or other subcategories.
  • 15. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising a set of instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations, the operations comprising: receiving an identifier;determining that the identifier is associated with a selection in a user interface of a combination of a category and a subcategory under which items included in listings in a networked marketplace environment are classified; andbased on the receiving of the identifier and the determining that the identifier is associated with the selection in the user interface of the combination of the category and the subcategory, automatically reselecting in the user interface the combination of the category and the subcategory.
  • 16. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the determining that the identifier is associated with the selection in the user interface of the combination of the category and the subcategory is based on the received identifier matching a stored identifier, the stored identifier having being previously associated with the selection in the user interface of the category and the subcategory.
  • 17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15, the operations further comprising, based on the reselecting in the user interface of the combination of the category and the subcategory, completing a registration of a listing of an item as being classified under the reselected category and subcategory.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 15, wherein the association of the stored identifier with the selection in the user interface of the category and subcategory is based on inputs received when information pertaining to categories and subcategories is represented in graphically distinct areas of the user interface.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the graphically distinct areas include a category area and one or more subcategory areas.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 18, wherein the information pertaining to the categories and subcategories is derived from database records corresponding to the categories and subcategories.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/491,703 filed Jan. 26, 2000, which application is incorporated in its entirety herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (141)
Number Name Date Kind
3573747 Adams et al. Apr 1971 A
3581072 Nymeyer May 1971 A
4412287 Braddock, III Oct 1983 A
4674044 Kalmus et al. Jun 1987 A
4677552 Sibley, Jr. Jun 1987 A
4789928 Fujisaki Dec 1988 A
4799156 Shavit et al. Jan 1989 A
4823265 Nelson Apr 1989 A
4864516 Gaither et al. Sep 1989 A
4903201 Wagner Feb 1990 A
4990005 Karakawa Feb 1991 A
5063507 Lindsey et al. Nov 1991 A
5077665 Silverman et al. Dec 1991 A
5101353 Lupien et al. Mar 1992 A
5136501 Silverman et al. Aug 1992 A
5168446 Wiseman Dec 1992 A
5205200 Wright Apr 1993 A
5243515 Lee Sep 1993 A
5258908 Hartheimer et al. Nov 1993 A
5280422 Moe et al. Jan 1994 A
5297031 Gutterman et al. Mar 1994 A
5297032 Trojan et al. Mar 1994 A
5305200 Hartheimer et al. Apr 1994 A
5325297 Bird et al. Jun 1994 A
5329589 Fraser et al. Jul 1994 A
5375055 Togher et al. Dec 1994 A
5394324 Clearwater Feb 1995 A
5426281 Abecassis Jun 1995 A
5485510 Colbert Jan 1996 A
5546575 Potter et al. Aug 1996 A
5553145 Micali Sep 1996 A
5557728 Garrett et al. Sep 1996 A
5596994 Bro Jan 1997 A
5598557 Doner et al. Jan 1997 A
5640569 Miller et al. Jun 1997 A
5657389 Houvener Aug 1997 A
5664115 Fraser Sep 1997 A
5689652 Lupien et al. Nov 1997 A
5694546 Reisman Dec 1997 A
5706457 Dwyer et al. Jan 1998 A
5710889 Clark et al. Jan 1998 A
5715314 Payne et al. Feb 1998 A
5715402 Popolo Feb 1998 A
5715444 Danish et al. Feb 1998 A
5717989 Tozzoli et al. Feb 1998 A
5721832 Westrope Feb 1998 A
5722418 Bro Mar 1998 A
5727165 Ordish et al. Mar 1998 A
5742768 Gennaro et al. Apr 1998 A
5771291 Newton et al. Jun 1998 A
5771380 Tanaka et al. Jun 1998 A
5790790 Smith et al. Aug 1998 A
5794219 Brown Aug 1998 A
5799285 Klingman Aug 1998 A
5803500 Mossberg Sep 1998 A
5818914 Fujisaki Oct 1998 A
5826244 Huberman Oct 1998 A
5835896 Fisher et al. Nov 1998 A
5845255 Mayaud Dec 1998 A
5845265 Woolston Dec 1998 A
5845266 Lupien et al. Dec 1998 A
5848399 Burke Dec 1998 A
5850442 Muftic Dec 1998 A
5872848 Romney et al. Feb 1999 A
5873069 Reuhl et al. Feb 1999 A
5874412 Priebe et al. Feb 1999 A
5884056 Steele Mar 1999 A
5890138 Godin et al. Mar 1999 A
5905974 Fraser et al. May 1999 A
5905975 Ausubel May 1999 A
5922074 Richard et al. Jul 1999 A
5924072 Havens Jul 1999 A
5926794 Fethe Jul 1999 A
5968110 Westrope Oct 1999 A
5983219 Danish et al. Nov 1999 A
5991739 Cupps et al. Nov 1999 A
6035288 Solomon Mar 2000 A
6035402 Vaeth et al. Mar 2000 A
6044363 Mori et al. Mar 2000 A
6047264 Fisher et al. Apr 2000 A
6055518 Franklin et al. Apr 2000 A
6058417 Hess et al. May 2000 A
6061448 Smith et al. May 2000 A
6073117 Oyanagi et al. Jun 2000 A
6085176 Woolston Jul 2000 A
6104815 Alcorn et al. Aug 2000 A
6119137 Smith et al. Sep 2000 A
6167382 Sparks et al. Dec 2000 A
6178408 Copple et al. Jan 2001 B1
6192407 Smith et al. Feb 2001 B1
6202051 Woolston Mar 2001 B1
6236400 Guerrero May 2001 B1
6243691 Fisher et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256028 Sanford et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266514 O'Donnell Jul 2001 B1
6275821 Danish et al. Aug 2001 B1
6307573 Barros Oct 2001 B1
6356899 Chakrabarti et al. Mar 2002 B1
6397221 Greef et al. May 2002 B1
6405175 Ng Jun 2002 B1
6449601 Friedland et al. Sep 2002 B1
6462762 Ku et al. Oct 2002 B1
6466918 Spiegel et al. Oct 2002 B1
6489968 Ortega et al. Dec 2002 B1
6496843 Getchius et al. Dec 2002 B1
6518984 Maeckel et al. Feb 2003 B1
6901403 Bata et al. May 2005 B1
6934690 Van Horn et al. Aug 2005 B1
7035864 Ferrari et al. Apr 2006 B1
7191147 Heene et al. Mar 2007 B2
7398229 Budish Jul 2008 B2
7839385 Hunleth et al. Nov 2010 B2
8082184 Yruski et al. Dec 2011 B2
8549407 O'Neil Oct 2013 B2
8670993 Henley Mar 2014 B2
8781940 Poon Jul 2014 B2
20020062265 Poon May 2002 A1
20020138481 Aggarwal et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030041004 Parry et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030061122 Berkowitz et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030065737 Aasman Apr 2003 A1
20040153371 Razumov Aug 2004 A1
20040254853 Heene et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050071251 Linden et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050216362 Navar et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050273417 Budish Dec 2005 A1
20060085253 Mengerink et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060167760 Chakraborty et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173742 Heene Aug 2006 A1
20070073591 Perry et al. Mar 2007 A1
20080091553 Koski Apr 2008 A1
20080120291 Delgo et al. May 2008 A1
20090150791 Garcia et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090248635 Gross Oct 2009 A1
20110029403 Xu Feb 2011 A1
20130013440 Raghavan Jan 2013 A1
20130125236 Lalonde et al. May 2013 A1
20130268561 Christie et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130290125 Raghavan Oct 2013 A1
20140040753 Garcia Feb 2014 A1
20140142973 Henley May 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
2253543 Mar 1997 CA
2658635 Aug 1991 FR
9300266 Sep 1994 NL
WO-9215174 Sep 1992 WO
WO-9517711 Jun 1995 WO
WO-9634356 Oct 1996 WO
WO-9737315 Oct 1997 WO
WO-9963461 Dec 1999 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (90)
Entry
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Appeal Brief filed Jan. 2, 2013”, 16 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703 , Response filed Oct. 1, 2012 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2012”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Advisory Action mailed Jun. 17, 2008”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Appeal Brief filed Sep. 29, 2008”, 24 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Appeal Decision mailed Nov. 25, 2013”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2008”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 4, 2002”, 44 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Final Office Action mailed May 31, 2006”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 29, 2012”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Final Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2001”, 31 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2011”, 9 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 26, 2006”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 27, 2007”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 14, 2001”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2007”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2001”, 43 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Jun. 26, 2008”, 4 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Preliminary Amendment filed Oct. 11, 2002”, 45 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Preliminary Amendment filed Nov. 14, 2001”, 28 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Mar. 12, 2002 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 12, 2001”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Mar. 20, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 26, 2006”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed May 27, 2008 to Final Office Action mailed Mar. 26, 2008”, 14 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed May 29, 2007 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 27, 2007”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed May 4, 2012 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jan. 4, 2012”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Jul. 13, 2001 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 14, 2001”, 39 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Jul. 27, 2005 to Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 28, 2005”, 18 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Nov. 30, 2006 to Final Office Action mailed May 31, 2006”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Response filed Dec. 11, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 19, 2007”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Restriction Requirement mailed Jun. 28, 2005”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/491,703, Supplemental Appeal Brief filed Sep. 8, 2009”, 24 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Advisory Action mailed Jan. 7, 2010”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Advisory Action mailed Nov. 20, 2003”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Appeal Brief filed Feb. 5, 2010”, 27 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Appeal Brief filed Feb. 15, 2006”, 24 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Appeal Brief filed Apr. 11, 2005”, 21 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Appeal Brief filed May 18, 2007”, 27 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Appeal Brief filed Sep. 25, 2006”, 25 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Examiner's Answer to Appeal Brief mailed Apr. 15, 2010”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2003”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 1, 2004”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 20, 2003”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Non Final Office Action mailed May 25, 2006”, 6 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2004”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Non Final Office Action mailed Jul. 1, 2005”, 5 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Preliminary Amendment filed Jul. 3, 2002”, 2 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Reply Brief filed Jun. 15, 2010”, 8 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Reply Brief filed Nov. 8, 2007”, 7 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Response filed Feb. 10, 2009 to Examiner's Answer mailed Dec. 10, 2008”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Response filed Jun. 3, 2003 to Non Final Office Action mailed Feb. 20, 2003”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Response filed Aug. 17, 2004 to Non Final Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2004”, 12 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Response filed Sep. 25, 2006 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 25, 2006”, 19 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/953,749, Response filed Nov. 3, 2003 to Final Office Action mailed Sep. 2, 2003”, 13 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Advisory Action mailed Aug. 25, 2011”, 3 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Final Office Action mailed Jun. 9, 2011”, 26 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2010”, 23 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 4, 2013”, 24 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Response filed Mar. 30, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 30, 2010”, 17 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Response filed Sep. 8, 2011 to Advisory Action mailed Aug. 25, 2011”, 15 pgs.
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/950,679, Response to Final Office Action Mailed Jun. 9, 2011”, 13 pgs.
“Onsale Joins Fray as Online Shopping Picks Up Speed: Internet Booms”, Computer Reseller News, CMP Publications, Inc., USA, (Jun. 5, 1995), 1 pg.
“Onsale: Onsale Brings Thrill of Auctions and Bargain Hunting Online; Unique Internet retail service debuts with week-long charity auction for the Computer Museum in Boston”, Business Wire, Dialog Web. 0489267 BW0022, (May 24, 1995), 3 pgs.
“Request for Ex Parte Reexamination of US Patent No. 6,275,821 mailed Oct. 28, 2008”, 36 pgs.
Baumann, G. W, “Personal Optimized Decision/Transaction Program”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, (Jan. 1995), 83-84.
Clemons, E., “Evaluating the prospects for alternative electronic securities”, Proceedings of ICIS 91: 12th International Conference on Information Systems, (Dec. 16-18, 1991), 53-63.
Downing, D. A, et al., “Dictionary of Computer and Internet Terms”, Sixth Edition, (1998), 175-177, 383-384.
Graham, Ian, “The Emergence of Linked Fish Markets in Europe”, Electronic Markets. vol. 8, No. 2, (1998), 29-32.
Granacki, J., et al., “A Component Library Management System and Browser, Research Report ISI/RR-93-386”, University of Southern California Information Sciences Institute, (Apr. 1993), p. 1-19.
Hauser, R., “Anonymous Delivery of Goods in Electronic Commerce”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 39(3), (Mar. 1996), 363-366.
Hess, C. M, et al., “Computerized Loan Organization System: An Industry Case Study of the Electronic Markets Hypothesis”, MIS Quarterly, vol. 18(3), (Sep. 1994), 251-275.
Klein, Stefan, “Introduction to Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 3-6.
Lee, H. G, “Electronic brokerage and electronic auction: the impact of IT on market structures”, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 4, (1996), 397-406.
Lee, Ho Geun, “AUCNET: Electronic Intermediary for Used-Car Transactions”, Focus Theme, Electronic Markets, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 24-28.
Malone, T., et al., “Electronic Markets and Electronic Hierarchies”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 30, No. 6, (Jun. 1987), 484-497.
Mardesich, Jodi, “Site Offers Clearance for End-of-Life Products—Onsale Takes Auction Gavel Electronic”, Computer Reseller News, (Jul. 8, 1996), 2 pps.
Massimb, Marcel, “Electronic Trading, Market Structure and Liquidity”, Financial Analysts Journal, 50(1), (Jan./Feb. 1994), 39-50.
Meade, J., “Visual 360: A Performance Appraisal System That's ‘Fun’”, HR Magazine, Society for Human Resource Management., (Jul. 1999), 3 pgs.
Neo, B. S, “The implementation of an electronic market for pig trading in Singapore”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems; vol. 1(5), (Dec. 1992), 278-288.
Post, D. L, et al., “Application of auctions as a pricing mechanism for the interchange of electric power”, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10(3), (Aug. 1995), 1580-1584.
Preist, Chris, et al., “Adaptive Agents in a Persistent Shout Double Auction”, International Conference on Information and Computation Economies, Proceedings of the first international conference on Information and computation economies, (1998), 11-18.
Reck, M., “Formally Specifying an Automated Trade Execution System”, The Journal of Systems and Software, 1993, Elsevier Science Publishing, USA, (1993), 245-252.
Reck, Martin, “Trading-Process Characteristics of Electronic Auctions”, Focus Theme, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 17-23.
Resnick, Paul, “Reputation systems”, Communications of the ACM, 43(12), (Dec. 2000), 45-48.
Rockoff, T. E, et al., “Design of an Internet-based system for remote Dutch auctions”, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, vol. 5(4), (Jan. 1, 1995), 10-16.
Schmid, B. F, “The Development of Electronic Commerce”, EM—Electronic Markets, No. 9-10, (Oct. 1993), 2 pgs.
Siegmann, Ken, “Nowhere to go but up”, PC Week; vol. 12(42), Ziff-Davis Publishing Company, (Oct. 23, 1995), 1-3.
Tjostheim, Ingvar, et al., “A case study of an on-line auction for the World Wide Web”, Norwegian Computing Center (NR), [Online]. Retrieved from the Internet: <URL: http://www.nr.no/˜ingvar/enter98.html>, (Accessed Feb. 21, 2005), 1-10.
Turban, Efraim, “Auctions and Bidding on the Internet: An Assessment”, Focus Theme, EM—Electronic Markets, vol. 7, No. 4, (1997), 7-11.
Van Heck, E., et al., “Experiences with Electronic Auctions in the Dutch Flower Industry”, Focus Theme, Erasmus University, The Netherlands, (1996), 6 pgs.
Warbelow, A, et al., “Aucnet: TV Auction Network System”, Harvard Business School Case/Study, HBVR#9-190-001, USA, (Jul. 1989), 1-16.
Zwass, V., “Electronic Commerce: Structures and Issues”, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, Fall 1996, vol. 1, No. 1, (Fall 1996), 3-23.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140325453 A1 Oct 2014 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09491703 Jan 2000 US
Child 14218425 US