Patent Application
20080028879
The invention may take physical form in certain parts and arrangement of parts, the preferred embodiment of which will be described in detail and illustrated in the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and wherein:
Referring now to the drawings, wherein the showings are for the purpose of illustrating the invention only and not for the purpose of limiting the same,
The first and second gear selector lever position sensors 30, 20 each comprise a digital encoding device operable to provide digital logic signals to the electronic control modules 40, 50, as described hereinbelow. The electronic control modules (“ECM”) 40, 50 described herein include an ability to monitor discrete input/output (‘I/O’) including that from first and second gear lever position sensors 30, 20. The transmission gear selector lever 10 comprises a operator-manipulated device operative to be place in one of a plurality of discrete positions, e.g. Park, Reverse, Neutral, Drive, Intermediate, and Low (‘PRNDIL’). First and second gear selector lever positions sensors 30, 20 are operatively attached to the gear selector lever 10. The first and second gear selector lever position sensors 30, 20 each comprise a digital encoder that provides discrete outputs for each of the valid gear selector lever positions, e.g. Park, Reverse, Neutral, Drive, Intermediate, and Low (‘PRNDIL’), as shown with reference to Table 1, below. The technology used to implement the digital encoder is known to a skilled practitioner, and practical considerations typically influence the choice of digital encoder. The individual positions for each of the valid gear selector lever positions are typically identified by mechanical detents in the transmission gear selector lever 10 mechanism (not shown).
Referring again to
The controller architecture uses two electronic control modules (‘ECM’), comprising the first ECM 40 and the second ECM 50. The first ECM 40 is signally connected to and adapted to monitor the second sensor 20, or direction encoder, and decoding the output thereof. The second ECM 50 is signally connected to and adapted to monitor the first sensor 30, or range encoder, and decoding the output thereof. The first ECM 40 and second ECM 50 are signally connected, preferably employing a high-speed bi-directional communications link, such as a serial peripheral interface bus (‘SPI’) comprising a known full-duplex synchronous serial data link permitting direct communication between the devices. The first ECM provides control signals to the transmission device to control operating direction of the vehicle. The second ECM 50 may provide additional control signals. Each ECM 40, 50 include an ability to monitor first and second gear selector lever position sensors 30, 20 by way of a discrete input/output (‘I/O’).
Each ECM is preferably a general-purpose digital computer generally comprising a microprocessor or central processing unit, read only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), electrically programmable read only memory (EPROM), high speed clock, analog-to-digital (A/D) and digital-to-analog (D/A) circuitry, and input/output circuitry and devices (I/O) and appropriate signal conditioning and buffer circuitry. Each ECM has set of control algorithms, comprising resident program instructions and calibrations stored in ROM and executed to provide the respective functions of each computer.
Algorithms for control and state estimation in each ECM are typically executed during preset loop cycles such that each algorithm is executed at least once each loop cycle. Algorithms stored in the non-volatile memory devices are executed by one of the central processing units and are operable to monitor inputs from the sensing devices and execute control and diagnostic routines to control operation of the respective device, using preset calibrations. Loop cycles are typically executed at regular intervals, for example each 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 milliseconds during ongoing engine and vehicle operation. Alternatively, algorithms may be executed in response to occurrence of an event.
Encoding patterns, show with reference again to Table 1, and executed with the Range and Direction Encoders are necessary for redundant, fault tolerant operation. Specifically, the Range Encoder 30 implements an encoding that allows detection of at least one fault, while the Direction Encoder 20 implements an encoding that allows detection of two faults and correction of a single fault. The greater fault tolerance of the Direction Encoder 20 allows it to be given greater weight in the even that the Range and Direction Encoders disagree on the direction of operation.
Referring again to Table 1, the Range Encoder 30 preferably provides an output comprising a plurality of discrete digital outputs, the quantity of which is determined based upon the quantity of N valid gear selector lever positions which are reduced using a log2(N), plus a parity bit for error detection. Therefore, in a typical system having less than four valid gear selector lever positions, the range encoder 30 provides three discrete outputs; in a system having four to seven valid gear selector lever positions, the range encoder provides four discrete outputs; and in a system having eight to fifteen valid gear selector lever positions, the range encoder provides five discrete outputs. Valid transmission gear selector lever positions are assigned encodings having a specific (even or odd) parity. The encodings for the valid positions preferably include a property exhibited by a rule requiring changing from one valid position to any other valid position requires changing state of at least two discrete outputs. Thus, when the transmission gear selector lever 10 is in a valid position, it cannot be misinterpreted as another valid position unless two discrete outputs are in an incorrect state due to faults. A single fault causes the parity check to fail, allowing the software to flag the presence of an invalid condition. The output state corresponding to a disconnected Range Encoder 30 is used to identify this condition and cannot be used to indicate a valid position. The specific assignment of encodings for each position is subject to practical considerations.
The Direction Encoder 20 preferably provides an output comprising a plurality of five discrete digital outputs, as shown in Table 1. Two of the outputs combine to provide a unique digital signal based upon a directional output of the transmission, wherein four states, i.e. Park, Reverse, Neutral, Forward Drive are each uniquely encoded. Three additional discrete outputs, comprising an Error Correcting Code (‘ECC’) output are also included. The output state corresponding to an output resulting when the Direction Encoder 20 is disconnected is used to identify this condition and cannot be used to indicate a valid direction state. Digital encodings for each of the valid directional outputs or states are chosen such that changing from one valid direction state to any other valid direction state results in changing state (from digital 1 to digital 0, or from digital 0 to digital 1) of three of the five discrete outputs. Thus, when the transmission gear selector lever 10 is in one of the valid positions, the direction state cannot be misinterpreted as another valid direction state unless three of the discrete outputs are each in an incorrect state due to faults. The specific assignment of encodings for each direction state is subject to practical considerations. Adhering to this assignment of encodings allows the software to effectively correct any single fault. The properties of an ECC ensure that the correct valid code can be recovered from an invalid code when only one output is corrupted. When a double fault exists such that two discrete outputs are in an incorrect state, and it is not detectable, the error correction logic may produce an erroneous result. This situation is addressed by validation logic described hereinbelow.
The software architecture for the system preferably effects continued operation in the presence of a single fault, and ensures that a Neutral propulsion state is commanded when a secondary fault occurs. The software architecture implements a “limp-home” capability in the event of a single ECM fault. Each of the ECMs 40, 50 is preferably operable to support a subset of the control logic and monitor the control signals input to the other ECM 50, 40.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The first ECM 40 diagnoses each output of the Direction Encoder 20 as being stuck in a logic-high or logic-low state. The error correcting encoding used by the Direction Encoder 20 facilitates the identification of faulty outputs.
When the first ECM 40 is offline, the architecture allows the Second ECM 50 to assume control using a potentially limited set of functions, i.e., “limp-home”. The second ECM 50 uses the logic given in Table 3 to determine system commands for the powertrain. When both the first ECM 40 and Second ECM 50 are offline, the vehicle is effectively disabled.
Thus, a method and apparatus are provided to determine a position of a lever having a plurality of operator-selectable positions. As previously referenced, this comprises a first lever-position sensor operable to detect each of the operator-selectable positions, e.g. the range encoder, and a second lever-position sensor operable to detect each of a plurality of subsets of the operator-selectable positions, e.g. the direction encoder. There is a first ECM adapted to monitor the second lever-position sensor, and a second ECM adapted to monitor the first lever-position sensor. The second ECM is operable to identify and communicate a specific one of the operator-selectable positions to the first controller, and the first ECM is operable to validate the specific one of the operator-selectable positions and communicate the validated specific one of the operator-selectable positions to a control system.
The invention has been described with specific reference to the preferred embodiments and modifications thereto. Further modifications and alterations may occur to others upon reading and understanding the specification. It is intended to include all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come with the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/703,913, filed Jul. 29, 2005, entitled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FAULT-TOLERANT TRANSMISSION SHIFT LEVER POSITION.
