The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for forming unit portions of frozen food materials, and at least in a particular embodiment, shaping portions of meat such as chicken breast meat into a desired configuration whereby a significantly higher yield of breast meat from chickens can be utilized for high-quality chicken breast products.
The applicant has significant experience in the food preparation arena. Patents for processing chicken portions include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,080,631 and 5,078,644. However, in processing food particularly chicken breast, it was observed by the applicant that a normal chicken breast as taken from a chicken is usually cut into only six chicken breast cutlets with the remainder of the chicken breast being utilized in other lower profit margin chicken products. Processors would normally covet 20 to 24 oz. chicken breasts, which would then be cut into six 2.5 oz. chicken breasts portions for a total usage of 15 of the 20 to 24 ounces. Thereby a maximum utilization of this type meat product would be around 62.5 to 75% at best for this high profit margin product. The remainder of the breast meat has been utilized in the past for lower profit margin products.
Often the breasts are provided at 30 to 40 ounces. This translates into a highest percentage of yield of this type product to be around 50%, and could be as low as 37.5%. With this type product, the breast is usually cut symmetrically down the middle. A lower portion of the breast is then cut into a first breast portion and then a portion above that is cut into a second breast portion. The thicker of those two portions would be cut in half to provide the respective six chicken portions shaped like breasts as are often bought in the grocery store as de-boned chicken breasts or are provided as chicken cutlets for chicken sandwiches. The remainder of the chicken breast is then often processed into nuggets or other lower profit margin chicken products.
In the fish industry, fishermen have been preparing fillets at sea and/or at fish processing units and then freezing fish filets as blocks. A box is normally filled and frozen containing the filets forming a block. Blocks are cut into slabs which are then cut into fish sticks such as is shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,643,952 and 3,294,012. Furthermore, frozen fish can also be processed into desired shapes as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,474,823.
However, in spite of this technology, there has still not been a good way to deal with efficiently utilizing poultry breast meat. Furthermore, although efforts have been made to produce desired shapes of food such as is shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,203,838 and 6,521,280, the applicant believes that improvements to existing food processing equipment can be provided over prior art designs.
It is an object of at least one embodiment of the present invention to provide an improved process and/or shaper for consistently providing a desired shape food product to the market with a higher percentage of higher profit margin products.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an improved process and/or shaping station for providing shaped food products.
It is another object of at least one embodiment of a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention to provide an improved process for utilizing a significantly higher percentage of chicken breast meat in higher profit chicken breast portions as has been previously provided to the market. Although chicken breast meat is a current focus of the applicant, other meats such as beef, pork, seafood of various varieties and even non-meat food such as vegetables, fruit or combinations of various foods could be treated with the method and apparatus as disclosed herein. Reference will be principally made throughout this disclosure referencing the chicken breast embodiment, but those of ordinary skill in the art will see how similar embodiments could be provided for various other food product embodiments.
In accordance with a presently preferred embodiment of the present invention, a method for processing chicken breast meat into chicken portions includes providing a split breast which has been taken from a processed chicken, marinating and then extruding the meat into a slab and then freezing the slab. The frozen slab is then shaped into a symmetrical plank if not already symmetrically formed and then portions are then cut to a specific weight and shape. The cut portions are then loaded into a magazine for feeding into a shaper where the cut portions are shaped into a desired configuration such as the shape of a chicken breast as would be bought in a grocery store or the shape of a chicken breast as would be provided at a fast food restaurant as a chicken breast for a chicken breast sandwich or other use. Of course, other food and/or meat products can be utilized as well in other embodiments and shaped into suitable configurations.
Utilizing the applicant a rather unique shaper configuration with at least one embodiment, which may have a double cylinder arrangement and linearly reciprocating tray which feeds cut pre-weighed portions into the shaper in a mold and/or other structure with at least one cavity at a shaping station. The formed product is then shaped with the mold and/or cavity. The mechanism is preferably all hydraulic and pneumatic to eliminate electrical issues which can occur in food processing plants due to harsh environments created during cleaning operations.
The particular features and advantages of the invention as well as other objects will become apparent from the following description taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
Meat processing usually involves hide and/or feather removal, eviscerating and at least partially butchering at least one of poultry, beef, pork, fish, or other seafood product. Other food products may be treated as would be known by those of ordinary skill in the art. After obtaining the food such as meat product, it is preferably marinated either individually or together in batch, continuous or other process in step 12. This may be optional in some processes but as it relates to meat and in particular poultry, marinating in a solution of salt, phosphate and water has been found to assist in extracting protein to a surface of the chicken. This has been found to make the chicken somewhat “sticky” as a raw material. Other food products may not require this step and/or this step may be skipped in some embodiments.
Next, the food is preferably extruded into a slab at step 14 along with other similar and/or dissimilar portions of food depending on the particular desired end product. Once a slab has been extruded, the slab in then preferably frozen in step 16. After freezing the slab, it is preferably shaped into a plank of specific dimensions. One method of shaping is described below with reference to
Instead of providing a rectangular cross section as may be visualized taken from the top down as is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,643,952 except for the fact that fish product is not extruded but is merely frozen in block form typically in a box, the top down cross section is anticipated to be a non-rectangular parallelogram of a known dimension so that preferably all of the portions that are cut from the slab are done in such a way that there is a minimum, if any waste. Specifically, in the fish stick business, the ends of the slab are traditionally differently shaped than all the intermediate portions of the slab. This irregularity can be eliminated by the use of a parallelogram type cross section. The lateral cross section remains rectangular in the preferred embodiment.
After forming the frozen slab, portions of the slab can be cut, or more preferably sliced, to a specific weight and/or shape so that each of the portions have a specific weight and shape depending on the formed shape for which they are to be provided. Portions are cut at step 20 after being shaped in a plank at step 18. After cutting the portions for a specific size and/or weight at step 20, they are then loaded into a magazine at step 22 and/or directly into a shaping station in step 24. Shaping station shapes the food item into a desired configuration as shall be shown and described in reference to the shaping station of the presently preferred embodiment as shown in
Although a preferred shaping station can be utilized in conjunction with the above method, it is worth observing that any suitable alternative can be utilized in connection with the method as shown and described in reference to
In the past, chicken breast meat was at best 75% utilized for 2.5 ounce chicken breast portions, wherein the applicant's preferred method it is estimated that up to 98% of the split chicken breast can be utilized for high quality chicken breast consumer products like 2.5 ounce chicken breasts. As a worst case scenario, in a situation in which six 2.5 ounce breast portions are taken from a 40 ounce split breast, less than 40% were utilized for this high quality application. Therefore, the applicant's method providing a higher return to the food processor than has previously been known with prior art techniques.
The applicant's method preferably utilizes the step of extrusion into a slab prior to freezing. It may be that extruding directly into planks may be performed and/or other technology may employed such as that shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,280 by AEW International Limited such that a slab could be sized and cut in portions of a desired weight and/or shape in other embodiments.
Additionally, the present embodiment of shaping the plank with a top down non-rectangular parallelogram cross section having a desired thickness so that particular cuts preferably with a knife or blade rather than a saw are known to produce a specific weight of meat and shape prior to shipping is also believed to be desirable in that there is almost no waste. Of course, other embodiments could take non-conforming sized portions and possibly join them together in their own plank and then continue the processing steps to shape them into a desired configuration.
When portions are cut in step 20, it is preferred to cut with a knife type arrangement as saws which have been previously utilized in the fish industry are known to produce fish sawdust which is believed to waste up to 20% of the block material which cannot then be easily processed into fish portions. Extremely little waste is experienced with knife cuts.
When freezing the slabs in step 16, it is anticipated to freeze to about zero degrees but other temperatures useful in a particular food segment could be utilized. When shaping the slab into a plank at step 18, the presently shape is somewhat like a 2×4 except that it could have other dimensions depending on a particular outcome for a desired unit shape.
Freezing can be done by the emersion of liquid nitrogen then to a mechanical freezer or a flip flop freezer and any other of the freezing techniques which are known in the art including freeze on paper, a plate freezer, etc.
With a method similar to the preferred embodiment described above, beef could be formed in a cube steak or a formed steak of an exact proportion utilizing a similar technique. Furthermore, turkey, veal, fish, seafood, pork or other product could be similarly shaped into a desired shape of known physical volume. A pork loin could be formed or any other the other desired outcome could likely be achieved.
Magazine 32 preferably provides cut portions 34 which are preferably sized of a known size, shape and/or weight to feed plate 36. Feed plate 36 is preferably linearly or otherwise reciprocated with drivers 38 such as cylinders 40 connected to pistons 42. As illustrated, feed plate 36 linearly reciprocates in and out relative to shaping station 50 which will be explained in further detail with reference to other drawings.
Limit switches 44,46 provide input to controller 80 shown in more detail in
In
In the presently preferred embodiment, with a two cylinder 58,60 construction, both cylinders are at least partially, if not fully, retracted when in the configuration shown in 9C. At least one of the two cylinders then start extending after the end 58 has cleared the shaping station 50. Once at least one of the two cylinder, 58,60 has extended to the desired length of extension with rods 62 (the other rod not shown), the first plate 52 is preferably disposed against second plate 64 under a desired pressure to cause the cut portions 34 to conform to a predetermined exterior shape at least similar to the cavity 66 such as under about 1,000 psi or other appropriate pressure. After shaping to the configuration as shown in
During method of an embodiment as shown in
The internals of controller 80 of the presently preferred embodiment are shown in
In the illustrated embodiment, relays 82,84,86,88,90,92,94 control operated valves for operation of various pneumatic and/or hydraulic compositions such as cylinders 58,60 and/or cylinder 38. Cabinet 102 is useful to protect all these interior components during cleaning. A scarcity of electrical components (i.e., none in the presently preferred embodiment) makes the shaper 30 particularly attractive for hazardous cleaning environments such as are often found in poultry processing plants.
FIGS. 5,6 and 7 show alternative embodiments of the second plate 64 as shown in
Slides can be utilized providing the shaped slab 206,208 configurations. Of course, in other embodiments, slides to at least assist in could enter from the left and right sides in addition to the front and back to provide the desired shape without the extensions 210,212 or extensions 226,228 illustrated. Divider 224 is illustrated fixed to second plate 204, but as one skilled in the art can see, these shaped slabs 206,208 could be created with two or more slides 220,224 to provide shaped slabs 206,208. Functionally, at least some of the shaper 200 can work similarly or dissimilarly to shapers 120 and/or 30.
Numerous alterations of the structure herein disclosed will suggest themselves to those skilled in the art. However, it is to be understood that the present disclosure relates to the preferred embodiment of the invention which is for purposes of illustration only and not to be construed as a limitation of the invention. All such modifications which do not depart from the spirit of the invention are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a divisional application of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/032,729 filed Feb. 18, 2008, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,110,236.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1928877 | Britt et al. | Oct 1933 | A |
1928917 | Vanderkloot | Oct 1933 | A |
1981889 | Wolff | Nov 1934 | A |
2021794 | Leone | Nov 1935 | A |
2413046 | Holly | Dec 1946 | A |
3040654 | Opie | Jun 1962 | A |
3114644 | Peterson | Dec 1963 | A |
3203037 | Anhanger et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
3347176 | Hall | Oct 1967 | A |
3548890 | Langen | Dec 1970 | A |
3584428 | Falk | Jun 1971 | A |
3638554 | Ackroyd | Feb 1972 | A |
3722398 | Freye et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3724026 | Gernandt | Apr 1973 | A |
3730740 | Schack et al. | May 1973 | A |
3753398 | Dohm, Jr. | Aug 1973 | A |
3765056 | Holly | Oct 1973 | A |
3842260 | Christensen et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3852507 | Toby | Dec 1974 | A |
3854391 | Ackroyd | Dec 1974 | A |
3864891 | Piereder | Feb 1975 | A |
3887964 | Richards | Jun 1975 | A |
3905735 | Thomas et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3943601 | Kuhlman | Mar 1976 | A |
3943602 | Siclari | Mar 1976 | A |
3959505 | Valiant, II | May 1976 | A |
4043728 | Holly | Aug 1977 | A |
4054967 | Sandberg et al. | Oct 1977 | A |
4113415 | Holly | Sep 1978 | A |
4118169 | Haluska | Oct 1978 | A |
4118831 | Holly et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4126704 | McCarthy et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
RE30096 | Richards | Sep 1979 | E |
4193167 | Orlowski et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4276318 | Orlowski et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4281593 | Gevaert | Aug 1981 | A |
4334339 | Holly | Jun 1982 | A |
4516291 | Goldberger et al. | May 1985 | A |
4535505 | Holly et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4541143 | Holly | Sep 1985 | A |
4597135 | Holly et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4608731 | Holly | Sep 1986 | A |
4659578 | Schlegel | Apr 1987 | A |
4685877 | Harada | Aug 1987 | A |
4744204 | Schlegel | May 1988 | A |
4984513 | Choquette | Jan 1991 | A |
5004622 | Choquette | Apr 1991 | A |
5037350 | Richardson et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5182120 | Kusters et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5658608 | Klefbeck | Aug 1997 | A |
5730650 | Soper | Mar 1998 | A |
5960705 | D'Alterio et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6468575 | Leech et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6997699 | Gallina | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7175417 | LaBruno et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7416753 | Lindee et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
20020115402 | Sandberg | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030113422 | Groneberg-Nienstedt et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040156965 | Ilch et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040224051 | LaBruno | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244602 | LaBruno et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050042321 | LaBruno et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050230875 | Miller et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060110510 | Tournour et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20070054005 | LaBruno et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080066627 | Lamartino et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080089971 | Sandberg et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20090241472 | Lindee et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090255419 | Kirsch | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100040752 | Doner et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100104412 | Abascal Albizu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 819 489 | Oct 2013 | EP |
WO 2006024467 | Mar 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110212211 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12032729 | Feb 2008 | US |
Child | 13106447 | US |