Method and apparatus for frame coding in vertical raster scan order for HEVC

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11350095
  • Patent Number
    11,350,095
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 9, 2018
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 31, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for frame coding in adaptive raster scan order. The method includes encoding at least one of image or video utilizing input frames and at least one of a data related to the input frame to produce bitstream with raster scan order information and displacement information for producing compressed video bitstream, at decoding time, decoding at least one of the encoded bitstream with raster scan order information and displacement information for producing compressed video bitstream.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention

Embodiments of the present invention generally relate to a method and apparatus for frame coding in vertical raster scan for HEVC.


Description of the Related Art

HEVC is a video coding standard being standardized to improve coding efficiency by 50% over H264/AVC. To achieve this goal, lots of new coding tools have been proposed for HEVC. However, all the proposed coding tools assume the horizontal raster scan of micro blocks, which has two problems: 1) Horizontal raster scan is not always effective in prediction especially for intra coding and 2) with sliding window memory for motion estimation (ME) and motion compensation (MC), large on-chip memory is required to compensate for large vertical motion. This is especially a challenging for UHD (ultra high definition) videos, such as, 4 k×2 k and 8 k×4 k. While UHD video coding is one of the application areas of HEVC, the frame coding in horizontal scan order is not cost effective at all for UHD videos with high vertical motion.


Therefore, there is a need for a method and/or apparatus for frame coding for HEVC.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention relate to a method and apparatus for frame coding in adaptive raster scan order. The method includes encoding at least one of image or video utilizing input frames and at least one of a data related to the input frame to produce bitstream with raster scan order information and displacement information for producing compressed video bitstream, at decoding time, decoding at least one of the encoded bitstream with raster scan order information and displacement information for producing compressed video bitstream.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to embodiments, some of which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.



FIG. 1 is an embodiment of a frame coding in horizontal raster scan order;



FIG. 2 is an embodiment of a frame coding in vertical raster scan order;



FIG. 3 is an embodiment of a vertical sliding window scheme for horizontal raster coding order;



FIG. 4 is an embodiment of a horizontal sliding window scheme for vertical raster coding order;



FIG. 5 is an embodiment depicting horizontal bottom-right to left;



FIG. 6 is an embodiment of a vertical right-bottom to top;



FIG. 7 is an embodiment of a portable device with video camera and motion sensor;



FIG. 8 is an embodiment of a video stabilizer in accordance with the prior art; and



FIG. 9 is an embodiment of an improved video stabilizer.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The proposed method and apparatus add a vertical raster scan order to the HEVC standard and adaptively select the best coding scan order between the horizontal and vertical raster scan orders based on any criteria, such as, size of horizontal/vertical motion, coding efficiency, on-chip memory saving and etc.


The vertical raster scan is effective for the frames which have lots of vertical discontinuities. FIG. 1 is an embodiment of a frame coding in horizontal raster scan order. FIG. 2 is an embodiment of a frame coding in vertical raster scan order. In FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, the frame with vertical discontinuities with horizontal and vertical raster scan orders are shown, respectively. When we apply the horizontal raster scan order, as shown in FIG. 1, more bits are used to encode micro block mode. This is due to incorrect mode prediction caused by discontinuity. However, the number of bits is reduced when we apply the vertical raster scan order, as shown in FIG. 2. Hence, the coding gain will be more significant for intra frames. The result indicates that the vertical raster scan can reduce bitrates up to 4% for some sequences, even without adaptive horizontal/vertical raster scan order decision. Thus, adaptive decision will result in even higher bit-rate saving.



FIG. 3 is an embodiment of a vertical sliding window scheme for horizontal raster coding order. If a video contains large vertical motion, the vertical sliding window scheme may not cover the large vertical motion. In this scenario, inter mode may not be used because required reference area is not available. This eventually causes encoding efficiency degradation. However, this problem could be solved by employing a horizontal sliding window scheme with vertical raster coding order, as illustrated in FIG. 4. FIG. 4 is an embodiment of a horizontal sliding window scheme for vertical raster coding order. Utilizing adaptively choosing raster scan order improves the coding efficiency of inter frames at the same on-chip memory requirement. On the other hand, the required on-chip memory size without coding gain loss is reduced.


For horizontal and vertical search range srX*srY, on-chip memory size (byte) for sliding window for 8-bit luma can be calculated as follows:

MemSizeHorOrder=picWidth*(2*srY+N),
MemSizeVertOrder=picHeight*(2*srX+N).


MemSizeHorOrder and MemSizeVertOrder are on-chip memory sizes for vertical sliding window (horizontal raster coding order) and horizontal sliding window (vertical raster coding order), respectively. N*N is the largest coding unit, and picWidth and picHeight are the horizontal and vertical size of the picture. Based on the equations, Table 1 lists the search ranges for different available on-chip memory sizes for 4 k×2 k (3840×2160) videos. For a given on-chip memory size, srY is always limited in vertical sliding window, which potentially causes encoding efficiency degradation for large vertical motion videos as illustrated in FIG. 3. By introducing vertical coding order with horizontal sliding window, we can remove the limitation on srY and avoid the degradation for large vertical motion videos.









TABLE 1







Available on-chip memory sizes vs. search ranges











500 KBytes
750 Kbytes
1,000 KBytes














srX
srY
srX
srY
srX
srY

















Vertical sliding
unlim-
+/−33
unlim-
+/−65
Unlim-
+/−98


window
ited

ited

ited


Horizontal
+/−83
unlim-
+/−141
Unlim-
+/−199
unlim-


sliding window

ited

ited

ited









The idea of vertical raster scan can be realized with frame rotation. Hence, similar effect may be seen by rotating input frames with horizontal raster scan. This information can be simply added as SEI (Supplemental Enhancement information) or VUI (Video Usability Information) in bitstreams. Moreover, we can extend this idea to any arbitrary raster scan order. We can apply one of 8 different raster can orders for each frames; horizontal top-left to right, as shown in FIG. 1, horizontal top-right to left, horizontal bottom-left to right, horizontal bottom-right to left, as shown in FIG. 5, vertical left-top to bottom FIG. 2, vertical left-bottom to bottom, vertical right-top to bottom and vertical right-bottom to top FIG. 6. It also can be realized by modifying input frames, i.e., e.g. rotating and/or flipping using SEI or VUI.



FIG. 7 is an embodiment of a portable device with video camera and motion sensor. The motion sensor consists one of the following sensors or a combination of them: accelerometer, gyroscope, magnetosensor etc. The motion sensor provided the camera orientation or displacement information. The displacement can be specified in terms of a rotation matrix, quarternion, euler angle etc.



FIG. 8 and FIG. 9 show a video stabilization where camera displacement information can be used. Video stabilization compensates for jitter in video due to changing camera position in order to provide a steady video. FIG. 8 is an embodiment of a video stabilizer in accordance with the prior art. In FIG. 8, the video stabilization is carried out in decoder. The camera displacement parameters are deduced from decoded frames and are used to translates/rotate/warp the decoded frame to generate stabilized video frames. Calculation of camera displacement parameters from decoded frames is very computationally intensive and prone to incorrect estimation.


On the other hand, FIG. 9 is an embodiment of an improved video stabilizer. The camera displacement information is calculated in the transmitter by using motion sensors. The displacement information is encapsulated in SEI/VUI and transmitted inside compressed bitstreams to receiver. The decoder at the receiver decodes the compressed bitstream with camera displacement SEI/VUI and generates decoded frames and displacement information which is then passed on to the video stabilization module which carries out video stabilization.


While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.

Claims
  • 1. A method comprising: decoding a bitstream that includes adaptive scan order information and displacement information for decoding video frames;wherein the displacement information is embedded in either a supplemental enhancement information (SEI) or a video usability information (VUI) message; andwherein the decoding of a first frame of the video frames includes one of rotating the first frame using the SEI or the VUI and flipping the first frame using SEI or VUI.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the bitstream further includes raster scan order information.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the raster scan order information is embedded in at least one of the SEI or VUI message.
  • 4. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a decoder, cause the decoder to: decode a bitstream that includes adaptive scan order information and displacement information for producing decoded video frames;wherein the displacement information is embedded in either a supplemental enhancement information (SEI) or a video usability information (VUI) message; andwherein the decoder decodes a first frame of the video frames by rotating the first frame using the SEI or the VUI or flipping the first frame using SEI or VUI.
  • 5. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 4, wherein the bitstream further includes raster scan order information.
  • 6. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 5, wherein the raster scan order information is embedded in at least one of the SEI or VUI message.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/583,460, filed May 1, 2017, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 14/561,816, filed Dec. 5, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,641,856, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/250,806, filed Sep. 30, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,934,729, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/388,478 filed Sep. 30, 2010, and which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/474,435, filed Apr. 12, 2011, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (14)
Number Name Date Kind
3571700 Paine et al. Mar 1971 A
5687095 Haskell et al. Nov 1997 A
6278272 Scarzello et al. Aug 2001 B1
7298141 Bartington Nov 2007 B2
7391210 Zhang et al. Jun 2008 B2
7391211 Cripe Jun 2008 B2
8339133 Teppan Dec 2012 B2
20050249289 Yagasaki Nov 2005 A1
20060013318 Webb Jan 2006 A1
20060209206 Wang et al. Sep 2006 A1
20070003149 Nagumo Jan 2007 A1
20080019446 Hannuksela Jan 2008 A1
20100098154 Lou Apr 2010 A1
20100254617 Hwang et al. Oct 2010 A1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Bazzocchi, et al. “Interference rejection algorithm for current measurement using magnetic sensor arrays”, Sensors and Actuators 85, 2000, pp. 38-41 (4 pages).
Dezuari, et al. “Printed circuit board integrated fluxgate sensor”, Sensors and Actuators 81, 2000, pp. 200-203 (4 pages).
Tang, et al. “Excitation circuit for fluxgate sensor using saturable inductor”, Sensors and Actuators A 113, 2004, pp. 156-165 (10 pages).
Ripka, et al. “Pulse Excitation of Micro-Fluxgate Sensors”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 37, No. 4, Jul. 2001, pp. 1998-2000 (3 pages).
Drljaca et al., “Low-Power 2-D Fully Integrated CMOS Fluxgate Magnetometer”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 5, No. 5, Oct. 2005, pp. 909-915 (7 pages).
Choi et al., “The Microfluxgate Magnetic Sensor Having Closed Magnetic Path”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 4, No. 6, Dec. 2004, pp. 768-771 (4 pages).
Minhua Zhou “Sub-Picture Based Raster Scan Coding Order for HEVC UHD Video Coding,” JCTVC-B062, Jul. 21-28, 2010, Geneva, Switzerland (5 pages).
Kwon et al. “Frame Coding in Vertical Scan Order,” JCTVC-C224, Oct. 7, 2010, Guangzhou, China (4 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190075294 A1 Mar 2019 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
61474435 Apr 2011 US
61388478 Sep 2010 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 15583460 May 2017 US
Child 16185401 US
Parent 14561816 Dec 2014 US
Child 15583460 US
Parent 13250806 Sep 2011 US
Child 14561816 US