This application claims benefit of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/474,650, filed Dec. 29, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,661,794.
The invention relates generally to network data processing. Networking products such as routers require high speed components for packet data movement, i.e., collecting packet data from incoming network device ports and queuing the packet data for transfer to appropriate forwarding device ports.
They also require high-speed special controllers for processing the packet data, that is, parsing the data and making forwarding decisions. Because the implementation of these high-speed functions usually involves the development of ASIC or custom devices, such networking products are of limited flexibility and thus tend to be quite rigid in their assignment of ports to the high-speed controllers. Typically, each controller is assigned to service network packets from for one or more given ports on a permanent basis.
In one aspect of the invention, forwarding data includes associating control information with data received from a first port and using the associated control information to enqueue the data for transmission to a second port in the same order in which the data was received from the first port.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description taken together with the drawings in which:
Referring to
The hardware-based multi-threaded processor 12 also includes a processor 23 that assists in loading microcode control for other resources of the hardware-based multi-threaded processor 12 and performs other general purpose computer type functions such as handling protocols, exceptions, extra support for packet processing where the microengines pass the packets off for more detailed processing. In one embodiment, the processor 23 is a StrongARM (ARM is a trademark of ARM Limited, United Kingdom) core based architecture. The processor (or core) 23 has an operating system through which the processor 23 can call functions to operate on the microengines 22a-22f. The processor 23 can use any supported operating system, preferably real-time operating system. For the core processor implemented as a StrongARM architecture, operating systems such as MicrosoftNT real-time, VXWorks and :CUS, a freeware operating system available over the Internet, can be used.
The six microengines 22a-22f each operate with shared resources including the memory system 18, a PCI bus interface 24 and an I/O bus interface 28. The PCI bus interface provides an interface to the PCI bus 14. The I/O bus interface 28 is responsible for controlling and interfacing the processor 12 to the I/O bus 16. The memory system 18 includes a Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory (SDRAM) 18a, which is accessed via an SDRAM controller 26a, a Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) 18b, which is accessed using an SRAM controller 26b, and a nonvolatile memory (shown as a FlashROM) 18c that is used for boot operations. The SDRAM 16a and SDRAM controller 26a are typically used for processing large volumes of data, e.g., processing of payloads from network packets. The SRAM 18b and SRAM controller 26b are used in a networking implementation for low latency, fast access tasks, e.g., accessing look-up tables, memory for the processor 23, and so forth. The microengines 22a-22f can execute memory reference instructions to either the SDRAM controller 26a or the SRAM controller 18b.
The hardware-based multi-threaded processor 12 interfaces to network devices such as a media access controller device, including a high-speed (or fast) device 31, such as Gigabit Ethernet MAC, ATM device or the like, over the I/O bus 16. In the embodiment shown, the high-speed device is a Dual Gigabit MAC device having two fast ports 33a, 33b. Each of the network devices attached to the I/O bus 16 can include a plurality of ports to be serviced by the processor 12. Other devices, such as a host computer (not shown), that may be coupled to the PCI bus 14 are also serviced by the processor 12. In general, as a network processor, the processor 12 can interface to any type of communication device or interface that receives/sends large amounts of data. The processor 12 functioning as a network processor could receive units of packet data from the device 31 and process those units of packet data in a parallel manner, as will be described. The unit of packet data could include an entire network packet (e.g., Ethernet packet) or a portion of such a packet.
Each of the functional units of the processor 12 are coupled to one or more internal buses. The internal buses include an internal core bus 34 (labeled “AMBA”) for coupling the processor 23 to the memory controllers 26a, 26b and to an AMBA translator 36. The processor 12 also includes a private bus 38 that couples the microengines 22a-22f to the SRAM controller 26b, AMBA translator 36 and the Fbus interface 28. A memory bus 40 couples the memory controllers 26a, 26b to the bus interfaces 24, 28 and the memory system 18.
Referring to
In addition to event signals that are local to an executing thread, the microengine employs signaling states that are global. With signaling states, an executing thread can broadcast a signal state to all microengines 22. Any and all threads in the microengines can branch on these signaling states. These signaling states can be used to determine availability of a resource or whether a resource is due for servicing.
The context event logic 74 has arbitration for the four threads. In one embodiment, the arbitration is a round robin mechanism. However, other arbitration techniques, such as priority queuing or weighted fair queuing, could be used. The microengine 22a also includes an execution box (EBOX) data path 76 that includes an arithmetic logic unit (ALU) 76a and a general purpose register (GPR) set 76b. The ALU 76a performs arithmetic and logical functions as well as shift functions.
The microengine 22a further includes a write transfer registers file 78 and a read transfer registers file 80. The write transfer registers file 78 stores data to be written to a resource. The read transfer registers file 80 is for storing return data from a resource. Subsequent to or concurrent with the data arrival, an event signal from the respective shared resource, e.g., memory controllers 26a, 26b, or core 23, will be provided to the context event arbiter 74, which in turn alerts the thread that the data is available or has been sent. Both transfer register files 78, 80 are connected to the EBOX 76 through a data path. In the described implementation, each of the register files includes 64 registers.
The functionality of the microengine threads is determined by microcode loaded (via the core processor) for a particular user's application into each microengine's control store 70. Referring to
The receive scheduler thread 92 assigns packets to receive processing threads 96. In a packet forwarding application for a bridge/router, for example, the receive processing thread parses packet headers and performs lookups based in the packet header information. Once the receive processing thread or threads 96 has processed the packet, it either sends the packet as an exception to be further processed by the core 23 (e.g., the forwarding information cannot be located in lookup and the core processor must learn it), or stores the packet in the SDRAM and queues the packet in a transmit queue by placing a packet link descriptor for it in a transmit queue associated with the transmit (forwarding port) indicated by the header/lookup. The transmit queue is stored in the SRAM. The transmit arbiter thread 100 prioritizes the transmit queues and the transmit scheduler thread 94 assigns packets to transmit processing threads that send the packet out onto the forwarding port indicated by the header/lookup information during the receive processing.
The receive processing threads 96 may be dedicated to servicing particular ports or may be assigned to ports dynamically by the receive scheduler thread 92. For certain system configurations, a dedicated assignment may be desirable. For example, if the number of ports is equal to the number of receive processing threads 96, then it may be quite practical as well as efficient to assign the receive processing threads to ports in a one-to-one, dedicated assignment. In other system configurations, a dynamic assignment may provide a more efficient use of system resources.
The receive scheduler thread 92 maintains scheduling information 104 in the GPRs 76b of the microengine within which it executes. The scheduling information 104 includes thread capabilities information 106, port-to-thread assignments (list) 108 and “thread busy” tracking information 110. At minimum, the thread capabilities information informs the receive scheduler thread as to the type of tasks for which the other threads are configured, e.g., which threads serve as receive processing threads. Additionally, it may inform the receive scheduler of other capabilities that may be appropriate to the servicing of a particular port. For instance, a receive processing thread may be configured to support a certain protocol, or a particular port or ports. A current list of the ports to which active receive processing threads have been assigned by the receive scheduler thread is maintained in the thread-to-port assignments list 108. The thread busy mask register 110 indicates which threads are actively servicing a port. The receive scheduler uses all of this scheduling information in selecting threads to be assigned to ports that require service for available packet data, as will be described in further detail below.
Referring to
The processors 23 and 22 issue commands to the push/pull engine interface 122 when accessing one of the resources 120. The push/pull engine interface 122 places the commands into queues (not shown), arbitrates which commands to service, and moves data between the resources 120, the core 23 and the microengines 22. In addition to servicing requests from the core 23 and microengines 22, the push/pull engines 122 also service requests from the ready bus 128 to transfer control information to a register in the microengine read transfer registers 80.
When a thread issues a request to a resource 120, a command is driven onto an internal command bus and placed in queues within the push/pull engine interface 122. Receive/read-related instructions (such as instructions for reading the CSRs) are written to a “push” command queue.
The CSRs 138 include the following types of registers: Fbus receive and transmit registers; Fbus and ready bus configuration registers; ready bus control registers; hash unit configuration registers; interrupt registers; and several miscellaneous registers, including a thread status registers. The registers which pertain to the receive process will be described in further detail.
The interrupt/signal registers include an INTER_THD_SIG register for inter-thread signaling. Any thread within the microengines 22 or the core 23 can write a thread number to this register to signal an inter-thread event.
Further details of the Fbus controller 130 and the ready bus controller 126 are shown in
Some of the relevant CSRs used to program and control the ready bus 128 and Fbus 132 for receive processes are shown in
Referring to
Although not depicted in detail, other bus registers include the following: a RDYBUS_TEMPLATE_CTL register 178 (
Referring to
When the ready bus sequencer is programmed with an appropriate instruction directing it to interrogate MAC receive ready flags, it reads the receive ready flags from the MAC device or devices specified in the instruction and places the flags into a RCV_RDY_HI register 210a and a RCV_RDY_LO register 210b, collectively, RCV_RDY registers 210. Each bit in these registers corresponds to a different device port on the I/O bus.
Also, and as shown in the figure, the bus interface unit 124 also supports two fast port receive ready flag pins FAST_RX1214a and FAST_RX2214b for the two fast ports of the fast MAC device 31. These fast port receive ready flag pins are read by the RSM 166 directly and placed into an RCV_RDY_CNT register 216. The RCV_RDY_CNT register 216 is one of several used by the receive scheduler thread to determine how to issue a receive request. It also indicates whether a flow control request is issued.
Referring to
There are two techniques for reading the ready bus registers: “autopush” and polling. The autopush instruction may be executed by the ready bus sequencer 160 during a receive process (rxautopush) or a transmit process (txautopush). Polling requires that a microengine thread periodically issue read references to the I/O bus interface 28.
The rxautopush operation performs several functions. It increments the receive ready count in the RCV_RDY_CNT register 216. If enabled by the RCV_RDY_CTL register 174, it automatically writes the RCV_RDY_CNT 216, the RCV_RDY_LO and RCV_RDY_HI registers 210b, 210a to the receive scheduler read transfer registers 80 (
The ready bus sequencer 160 polls the MAC FIFO receive ready flags periodically and asynchronously to other events occurring in the processor 12. Ideally, the rate at which the MAC FIFO receive ready flags are polled is greater than the maximum rate at which the data is arriving at the MAC device ports. Thus, it is necessary for the receive scheduler thread 92 to determine whether the MAC FIFO receive ready flags read by the ready bus sequencer 160 are new, or whether they have been read already. The rxautopush instruction increments the receive ready count in the RCV_RDY_CNT register 216 each time the instruction executes. The RCV_RDY_CNT register 216 can be used by the receive scheduler thread 92 to determine whether the state of specific flags have to be evaluated or whether they can be ignored because receive requests have been issued and the port is currently being serviced. For example, if the FIFO threshold for a Gigabit Ethernet port is set so that the receive ready flags are asserted when 64 bytes of data are in the MAC receive FIFO 206, then the state of the flags does not change until the next 64 bytes arrive 5120 ns later. If the sequencer 160 is programmed to collect the flags four times each 5120 ns period, the next three sets of ready flags that are collected by the ready bus sequencer 160 can be ignored.
When the receive ready count is used to monitor the freshness of the receive ready flags, there is a possibility that the receive ready flags will be ignored when they are providing new status. For a more accurate determination of ready flag freshness, the receive request count may be used. Each time a receive request is completed and the receive control information is pushed onto the RCV_CNTL register 232, the RSM 166 increments the receive request count. The count is recorded in the RCV_RDY_CNT register the first time the ready bus sequencer executes an rxrdy instruction for each program loop. The receive scheduler thread 92 can use this count to track how many requests the receive state machine has completed. As the receive scheduler thread issues commands, it can maintain a list of the receive requests it submits and the ports associated with each such request.
Referring to
Referring to
Still referring to
The RCV_REQ register 230 is used to initiate a receive transfer on the Fbus and is mapped to a two-entry FIFO that is written by the microengines. The I/O bus interface 28 provides signals (not shown) to the receive scheduler thread indicating that the RCV_REQ FIFO 230 has room available for another receive request and that the last issued request has been stored in the RCV_REQ register 230.
Referring to
The RSM 166 reads the RCV_REQ register entry 231 to determine how it should receive data from the Fbus 132, that is, how the signaling should be performed on the Fbus, where the data should be placed in the RFIFO and which microengine thread should be signaled once the data is received. The RSM 166 looks for a valid receive request in the RCV_REQ FIFO 230. It selects the MAC device identified in the RM field and selects the specified port within the MAC by asserting the appropriate control signals. It then begins receiving data from the MAC device on the Fbus data lines. The receive state machine always attempts to read either eight or nine quadwords of data from the MAC device on the Fbus as specified in the receive request. If the MAC device asserts the EOP signal, the RSM 166 terminates the receive early (before eight or nine accesses are made). The RSM 166 calculates the total bytes received for each receive request and reports the value in the RCV_CNTL register 232. If EOP is received, the RSM 166 determines the number of valid bytes in the last received data cycle.
The RCV_CNTL register 232 is mapped to a four-entry FIFO (referred to herein as RCV_CNTL_FIFO 232) that is written by the receive state machine and read by the microengine thread. The I/O bus interface 28 signals the assigned thread when a valid entry reaches the top of the RCV_CNTL FIFO. When a microengine thread reads the RCV_CNTL register, the data is popped off the FIFO. If the SIGRS field 230i is set in the RCV_REQ register 230, the receive scheduler thread 92 specified in the RCV_CNTL register 232 is signaled in addition to the thread specified in TID field 230k. In this case, the data in the RCV_CNTL register 232 is read twice before the receive request data is retired from the RCV_CNTL FIFO 232 and the next thread is signaled. The receive state machine writes to the RCV_CNTL register 232 as long as the FIFO is not full. If the RCV_CNTL FIFO 232 is full, the receive state machine stalls and stops accepting any more receive requests.
Referring to
The thread done registers 240 can be read and written to by the threads using a CSR instruction. Using these registers, the receive scheduler thread can determine which RFIFO elements are not in use. The THREAD_DONE CSRs 240 support a two-bit message for each microengine thread. The assigned receive thread may write a two-bit message to this register to indicate that it has completed its task. Each time a message is written to the THREAD_DONE register, the current message is logically ORed with the new message. The bit values in the THREAD_DONE registers are cleared by writing a “1”, so the scheduler may clear the messages by writing the data read back to the THREAD_DONE register. The definition of the 2-bit status field is determined in software.
The assigned receive processing threads write their status to the THREAD_DONE register whenever the status changes. When the receive scheduler reads the THREAD_DONE register, it can look at the returned value to determine the status of each thread and then update its thread/port assignment list.
The packet rate of a fast port (e.g., a Gigabit port) is such that the rate at which the receive state machine reads MPKTs from a single port is so fast that a receive thread may not be able to process an MPKT before the receive state machine brings in another MPKT from the same port. That is, a fast port may require the use of a number of RFIFO elements and receive threads in parallel to maintain full line rate. The amount of processing required for an MPKT may include header processing (e.g., header modification, forward lookup) or simply moving a packet body fragment to memory.
Fast packets and, in some cases, fast MPKTs (i.e., MPKTs which make up packets received from fast ports) can be processed in parallel and by different threads, so there is a need to maintain intra-packet order and inter-packet order for a given port. Thus, to maintain packet order for packets received from fast ports, the network processor 12 uses sequence numbers, one set for each high-speed port. Each set of sequence numbers provides a network packet sequence number, an MPKT sequence number and an enqueue sequence number. These sequence numbers are maintained as 4-bit counters within the I/O bus interface 28 and automatically roll over to zero once they reach a count of fifteen.
The sequence numbers are maintained in Fbus receive registers (CSRs). Referring to
The network packet sequence number in either the SOP_SEQ1 register (for fast port 1) or SOP_SEQ2 register (for fast port 2) register is placed into the RCV_CNTL register, and incremented at the same time. The receive state machine increments the packet sequence numbers in a manner that allows the receive processing threads to track not only the sequence of the network packets, but also the sequence of the individual MPKTs. If the SOP signal is detected during a receive request, the network packet sequence number provides a sequence number based on a network packet (hereinafter referred to as an SOP sequence number). If the SOP signal is not detected during a receive request, the packet sequence number is based on an MPKT (hereinafter, MPKT sequence number). The receive threads can determine the type of packet sequence number since the RCV_CNTL register contains both the packet sequence number and SOP status.
The SOP and MPKT sequence numbers for each fast port are implemented as 4-bit counters. The SOP sequence number counter is incremented each time an SOP is detected. An MPKT sequence number counter receives the SOP sequence number whenever the SOP signal is asserted, and is incremented once per receive request when the SOP signal is not detected.
The enqueue sequence numbers are used by the receive processing threads to determine whether it is their turn to place a complete network packet onto a transmit queue. When an entire network packet has been received, the receive processing thread reads the enqueue sequence number from the appropriate enqueue_seq register. If the enqueue sequence number matches the SOP sequence number assigned to the packet, the receive processing thread can place the packet onto a transmit queue. If the enqueue sequence number does not match, the receive processing thread waits for a “sequence number change” signal event to occur. When the event occurs, the receive processing thread reads the enqueue sequence number again and checks for a match. If a match occurs, the packet may be placed onto a transmit queue.
After a packet is placed on a transmit queue, the receive processing thread increments the enqueue sequence number. The enqueue sequence numbers are incremented by writing to either the ENQUEUE_SEQ1 or ENQUEUE_SEQ2 register. A receive processing thread may choose to write its processing status to the THREAD_DONE register as well as increment the enqueue sequence number at the same time. This can be accomplished with a single write instruction to additional CSRs, a THREAD_DONE_INCR1 register or the THREAD_DONE_INCR2 register (not shown).
The receive scheduler thread controls the rate at which it issues receive requests. It issues a number of receive requests that is no more than that required by a port, but is sufficient to prevent an overflow of that port's receive FIFO.
When using slower ports, such as 10/100 BaseT Ethernet ports, the receive scheduler thread reads the MAC receive FIFO ready flags for multiple ports, determines which ports have data available, and issues receive requests based on the knowledge that data is available in the MAC receive FIFO. Since it reads multiple receive FIFO ready flags each time, it can issue multiple receive requests before it has to read the flags again. Because fast ports operate at a much higher data rate than slow ports and the latencies associated with certain tasks, e.g., reading the receive ready flags from a port or from the RCV_RDY_HI/LO registers, writing a receive request to RCV_REQ, may be greater than that packet arrival rate, the rate at which a single MAC port must be serviced cannot be sustained by issuing receive requests only when data is known to be available in a device port receive FIFO.
Therefore, the receive scheduler thread uses speculative requests for high-speed ports. That is, the receive scheduler thread issues multiple receive requests to a port based on the speculation that there is data available in that port's receive FIFO. At the time the RSM 166 processes each receive request, it determines if data is actually available at the port. Based on this determination, the RSM 166 either processes or cancels the request.
The RSM 166 determines whether there is data available at either of the two fast ports by reading the fast receive ready pins (FAST_RX1214a and FAST_RX2214b of
If a fast ready pin in not asserted, the RSM 166 cancels the pending request and writes a cancel message into the RCV_CNTL register's message field. It then signals the assigned receive processing thread. The receive processing thread is programmed to read the RCV_CNTL register, interpret the cancel message correctly and indicate to the receive scheduler thread that it is available for other tasks.
The state of the two fast ready pins is indicated in the FRDY2 field 216d (for port 2) and FRDY1 field 216e (for port 1) of the RCV_RDY_CNT register 216 (shown in
The receive state machine 166 supports three fast port modes that determine how receive processing threads are assigned to process packet data in the RFIFO. These fast port modes are referred to as single thread, header/body thread and explicit thread modes. When selecting a mode, the network processor considers the following: availability of threads to process each receive request; execution time for the receive thread. The modes need to understand where one network packet ends and the next one begins. To that end, they rely on the beginning of the network packet as corresponding to the assertion of SOP and the ending of the network packet corresponding to the assertion of EOP. Referring back to
The single thread mode assigns a single thread to each packet when using speculative requests. If the single thread mode is specified in the RCV_RDY_CTL register 176 and fast port thread mode (RCV_REQ[17:16]) is set, the RSM 166 performs in the following manner. If the RSM 166 detects an SOP in the receive data transfer for the MPKT, it signals the thread specified in the RCV_REQ register 230. That is, it writes the thread ID of the specified thread to the TID field 230k. It also saves that thread ID in the appropriate header field of the REC_FASTPORT_CTL register 176. If SOP is not detected, the RSM 166 ignores the thread ID specified in the RCV_REQ register and signals the thread specified in the header field in the REC_FASTPORT_CTL register. The RSM 166 writes the unused thread ID to the RCV_CNTL register MACPORT/THD field 232b. The unused ID is returned to the receive scheduler thread so the receive scheduler thread can update its thread availability list. To return the thread ID, the RSM 166 signals the receive thread when the receive request is complete and the receive thread passes the unused thread ID to the receive scheduler using inter-thread communications. Alternatively, the receive scheduler thread can request that it be signaled as well as the receive processing thread after the RSM completes the receive request. In this case, RCV_CNTL must be read twice before data is removed from the RCV_CNTL FIFO. In most cases, the receive processing thread reads it once and the receive scheduler thread also reads it once. If two reads are not performed, the RSM stalls. In another alternative, the RSM signals the receive processing thread when the receive request is complete and the receive processing thread returns the unused thread to the receive scheduler thread using an inter-thread signaling register which, like the thread done registers, has a bit for each thread and is read periodically by the receive scheduler to determine thread availability. It sets the bit corresponding to the unused thread ID in that register, which is then read by the receive scheduler thread.
In the header/body mode, two threads are assigned to process the MPKTs within a network packet. The first thread serves as the header thread and is responsible for processing the header to determine how to forward the packet. The second thread is the body thread, which is responsible for moving the remainder of the packet to the SDRAM. When the body thread completes its task, it uses inter-thread signaling to notify the header thread where the body of the packet is located. The header thread can then place the packet onto a transmit queue.
The RSM 166 supports the header and body threads in the following manner. If the RSM 166 detects an SOP, it signals the thread specified in RCV_REQ register and saves the thread number in the header field of REC_FASTPORT_CTL register 176. When it processes the next request, it signals the thread specified in RCV_REQ register 230 and saves the thread number in the body field of REC_FAST_PORT_CTL register 176. From this point forward, the RSM ignores the thread ID presented in the RCV_REQ register 230 and signals the body thread specified in REC_FASTPORT_CTL register 176. The RSM writes the unused thread ID to the RCV_CNTL register's MACPORT/THD field 232b. As with the single thread mode, the unused thread ID is returned to the receive scheduler thread so the receive scheduler thread knows that the thread is available for processing.
In explicit thread mode, the RSM always uses the thread assignment in the receive request as indicated by the RCV_REQ register 230. In this mode, the receive scheduler thread provides each receive processing thread with the ID of the thread assigned to the next MPKT receive request so that the thread can signal the next assigned thread for the next consecutive MPKT that is it done, the exception being the last thread in line, which receives instead the thread ID of the header thread. Additionally, each thread provides the next assigned thread with a pointer to the buffer memory, thus ensuring the MPKTs for a given network packet are queued in packet memory in the order in which they arrived. Once the thread assigned to the EOP MPKT has completed processing and has been signaled by the thread for the previous MPKT, it notifies the header thread that the entire packet can be enqueued on the transmit queue, provided, that is, that the enqueue sequence number matches the SOP sequence number of the MPKT processed by the header thread. The MPKT sequence number is provided to ensure that MPKTS are queued in the correct order.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
It will be appreciated that the processes depicted in
Additions, subtractions, and other modifications of the preferred embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those practiced in this field and are within the scope of the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3373408 | Ling | Mar 1968 | A |
3478322 | Evans | Nov 1969 | A |
3623001 | Kleist et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3736566 | Anderson et al. | May 1973 | A |
3792441 | Wymore et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3889243 | Drimak | Jun 1975 | A |
3940745 | Sajeva | Feb 1976 | A |
4016548 | Law et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4032899 | Jenny et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4075691 | Davis et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4130890 | Adam | Dec 1978 | A |
4400770 | Chan et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4514807 | Nogi | Apr 1985 | A |
4523272 | Fukunaga et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4658351 | Teng | Apr 1987 | A |
4709347 | Kirk | Nov 1987 | A |
4745544 | Renner et al. | May 1988 | A |
4788640 | Hansen | Nov 1988 | A |
4831358 | Ferrio et al. | May 1989 | A |
4858108 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4866664 | Burkhardt, Jr. et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4890218 | Bram | Dec 1989 | A |
4890222 | Kirk | Dec 1989 | A |
4991112 | Callemyn | Feb 1991 | A |
5115507 | Callemyn | May 1992 | A |
5140685 | Sipple et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142683 | Burkhardt, Jr. et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5155831 | Emma et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5155854 | Flynn et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5168555 | Byers et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5173897 | Schrodi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5202987 | Bayer et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5251205 | Callon | Oct 1993 | A |
5255239 | Taborn et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5263169 | Genusov et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5313454 | Bustini et al. | May 1994 | A |
5347648 | Stamm et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5367678 | Lee et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5379295 | Yonehara | Jan 1995 | A |
5379432 | Orton et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390329 | Gaertner et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392391 | Caulk, Jr. et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392411 | Ozaki | Feb 1995 | A |
5392412 | McKenna | Feb 1995 | A |
5404464 | Bennett | Apr 1995 | A |
5404469 | Chung | Apr 1995 | A |
5404482 | Stamm et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5404484 | Schlansker et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5432918 | Stamm | Jul 1995 | A |
5448702 | Garcia, Jr. et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5450351 | Heddes | Sep 1995 | A |
5452437 | Richey et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452452 | Gaetner et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5459842 | Begun et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5459843 | Davis | Oct 1995 | A |
5463625 | Yasrebi | Oct 1995 | A |
5467452 | Blum et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475856 | Kogge | Dec 1995 | A |
5485455 | Dobbins et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5515296 | Agarwal | May 1996 | A |
5517648 | Bertone et al. | May 1996 | A |
5539737 | Lo et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542070 | LeBlanc et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542088 | Jennings, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5544236 | Andruska et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550816 | Hardwick et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5557766 | Takiguchi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5568476 | Sherer et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568617 | Kametani | Oct 1996 | A |
5574922 | James | Nov 1996 | A |
5581729 | Nistala et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592476 | Calamvokis et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5592622 | Isfeld et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5613071 | Rankin et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5613136 | Casavant et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5617327 | Duncan | Apr 1997 | A |
5623489 | Cotton et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625812 | David | Apr 1997 | A |
5627829 | Gleeson et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630074 | Beltran | May 1997 | A |
5630130 | Perotto et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633865 | Short | May 1997 | A |
5638531 | Crump et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644623 | Gutledge | Jul 1997 | A |
5649110 | Ben-Nun et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649157 | Williams | Jul 1997 | A |
5651002 | Van Seters et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5659687 | Kim et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5680641 | Sidman | Oct 1997 | A |
5689566 | Nguyen | Nov 1997 | A |
5692126 | Templeton et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5699537 | Sharangpani et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701434 | Nakagawa | Dec 1997 | A |
5717898 | Kagan et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5721870 | Matsumoto | Feb 1998 | A |
5724574 | Stratigos et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740402 | Bratt et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742587 | Zornig et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742782 | Ito et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5742822 | Motomura | Apr 1998 | A |
5745913 | Pattin et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751987 | Mahant-Shetti et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754764 | Davis et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761507 | Govett | Jun 1998 | A |
5761522 | Hisanga et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764915 | Heimsoth et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768528 | Stumm | Jun 1998 | A |
5781551 | Born | Jul 1998 | A |
5781774 | Krick | Jul 1998 | A |
5784649 | Begur et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784712 | Byers et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5796413 | Shipp et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797043 | Lewis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805816 | Picazo, Jr. et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809235 | Sharma et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809237 | Watts et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809530 | Samra et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812868 | Moyer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828746 | Ardon | Oct 1998 | A |
5828863 | Barrett et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828881 | Wang | Oct 1998 | A |
5828901 | O'Toole et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832215 | Kato et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835755 | Stellwagen, Jr. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838988 | Panwar et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850399 | Ganmukhi et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850530 | Chen et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854922 | Gravenstein et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857188 | Douglas | Jan 1999 | A |
5860138 | Engebretsen et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860158 | Pai et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5886992 | Raatikaien et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887134 | Ebrahim | Mar 1999 | A |
5890208 | Kwon | Mar 1999 | A |
5892979 | Shiraki et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898686 | Virgile | Apr 1999 | A |
5898701 | Johnson | Apr 1999 | A |
5898885 | Dickol et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905876 | Pawlowski et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905889 | Wilhelm, Jr. | May 1999 | A |
5909686 | Muller et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915123 | Mirsky et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918235 | Kirshenbaum et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5933627 | Parady et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5937187 | Kosche et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5938736 | Muller et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940612 | Brady et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940866 | Chisholm et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5946487 | Dangelo | Aug 1999 | A |
5948081 | Foster | Sep 1999 | A |
5953336 | Moore et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958031 | Kime | Sep 1999 | A |
5960210 | Jin | Sep 1999 | A |
5961628 | Nguyen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968169 | Pickett | Oct 1999 | A |
5970013 | Fischer et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974518 | Nogradi | Oct 1999 | A |
5978838 | Mohamed et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983274 | Hyder et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995513 | Harrand et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012151 | Mano | Jan 2000 | A |
6014729 | Lannan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023742 | Ebeling et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032190 | Bremer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032218 | Lewin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6047002 | Hartmann et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049867 | Eickemeyer et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058168 | Braband | May 2000 | A |
6061710 | Eickemeyer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067300 | Baumert et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067585 | Hoang | May 2000 | A |
6070231 | Ottinger | May 2000 | A |
6072781 | Feeney et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6073215 | Snyder | Jun 2000 | A |
6079008 | Clery, III | Jun 2000 | A |
6085215 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6085248 | Sambamurthy et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6085294 | Van Doren et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092127 | Tausheck | Jul 2000 | A |
6092158 | Harriman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104700 | Haddock et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111886 | Stewart | Aug 2000 | A |
6112016 | MacWilliams et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6122251 | Shinohara | Sep 2000 | A |
6128669 | Moriarty et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134665 | Klein et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141677 | Hanif et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141689 | Yasrebi | Oct 2000 | A |
6141765 | Sherman | Oct 2000 | A |
6144669 | Williams et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6145054 | Mehrotra et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157955 | Narad et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160562 | Chin et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170051 | Dowling | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6175927 | Cromer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182177 | Harriman | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195676 | Spix et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199133 | Schnell | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201807 | Prasanna | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212542 | Kahle et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212544 | Borkenhagen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212604 | Tremblay | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212611 | Nizar et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216220 | Hwang | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223207 | Lucovsky et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223238 | Meyer et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223243 | Ueda et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223274 | Catthoor et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223279 | Nishimura et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226680 | Boucher et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247025 | Bacon | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256713 | Audityan et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269391 | Gillespie | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272109 | Pei et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272520 | Sharangpani et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6272616 | Fernando et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275505 | O'Loughlin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279113 | Vaidya | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282169 | Kiremidjian | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286083 | Chin et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289011 | Seo et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295600 | Parady et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298370 | Tang et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6307789 | Wolrich et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311261 | Chamdani et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320861 | Adam et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324624 | Wolrich et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6335932 | Kadambi et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6338078 | Chang et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345334 | Nakagawa et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347344 | Baker et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349331 | Andra et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6356962 | Kasper et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359911 | Movshovich et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360262 | Guenthner et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360277 | Ruckley et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366998 | Mohamed | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373848 | Allison et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377998 | Noll et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6389031 | Chao et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389449 | Nermirovsky et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393026 | Irwin | May 2002 | B1 |
6393483 | Latif et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6404737 | Novik et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415338 | Habot | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6418488 | Chilton et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424657 | Voit et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424659 | Viswanadham et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6426940 | Seo et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426943 | Spinney et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6427196 | Adiletta et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430626 | Witkowski et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434145 | Opsasnick et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438132 | Vincent et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438134 | Chow et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448812 | Bacigalupo | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453404 | Bereznyi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457015 | Eastham | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463035 | Moore | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463072 | Wolrich et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463480 | Kikuchi et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6463527 | Vishkin | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466898 | Chan | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477562 | Nemirovsky et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6484224 | Robins et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6493754 | Rosborough et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501731 | Chong et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507862 | Joy et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522188 | Poole | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526451 | Kasper et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526452 | Petersen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529983 | Marshall et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532509 | Wolrich et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535878 | Guedalia et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6552826 | Adler et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6553406 | Berger et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6560667 | Wolrich et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570850 | Gutierrez et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6577542 | Wolrich et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584522 | Wolrich et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587906 | Wolrich et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604125 | Belkin | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606326 | Herring | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6606704 | Adiletta et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625654 | Wolrich et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6628668 | Hutzli et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629147 | Grow | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629236 | Aipperspach et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631422 | Althaus et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631430 | Wolrich et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6631462 | Wolrich et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657963 | Paquette et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6658551 | Berenbaum et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661774 | Lauffenburger et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661794 | Wolrich et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665699 | Hunter et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665755 | Modelski et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6667920 | Wolrich et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6668317 | Bernstein et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671827 | Guilford et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6675190 | Schabernack et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6675192 | Emer et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6678746 | Russell et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680933 | Cheesman et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681300 | Wolrich et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6684326 | Cromer et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694380 | Wolrich et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697379 | Jacquet et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6721325 | Duckering et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724767 | Chong et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728845 | Adiletta | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732187 | Lougheed et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6754211 | Brown | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754222 | Joung et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6768717 | Reynolds et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6775284 | Calvignac et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792488 | Wolrich et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6798744 | Loewen et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6826615 | Barrall et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6834053 | Stacey et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6850521 | Kadambi et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6856622 | Calamvokis et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6873618 | Weaver | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876561 | Wolrich et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6895457 | Wolrich et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6925637 | Thomas et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6931641 | Davis et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934780 | Modelski et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934951 | Wilkinson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6938147 | Joy et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6944850 | Hooper et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947425 | Hooper et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6952824 | Hooper et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6959002 | Wynne et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6967963 | Houh et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6976095 | Wolrich et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981077 | Modelski et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6983350 | Wheeler et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7006495 | Hooper | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7065569 | Teraslinna | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069548 | Kushlis | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7096277 | Hooper | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100102 | Hooper et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7111072 | Matthews et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7111296 | Wolrich et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7124196 | Hooper | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7126952 | Hooper et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7149786 | Bohringer et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7181742 | Hooper | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7191321 | Bernstein et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206858 | Hooper et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7248584 | Hooper | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7305500 | Adiletta et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328289 | Wolrich et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7352769 | Hooper et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7443836 | Hooper et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
20010023487 | Kawamoto | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020027448 | Bacigalupo | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020041520 | Wolrich et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020075878 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020118692 | Oberman et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020150047 | Knight et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020181194 | Ho et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030043803 | Hooper | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030067934 | Hooper et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086434 | Kloth | May 2003 | A1 |
20030105901 | Wolrich et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030105917 | Ostler et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110166 | Wolrich et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115347 | Wolrich et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115426 | Rosenbluth et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131198 | Wolrich et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030140196 | Wolrich et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145159 | Adiletta et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147409 | Wolrich et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161303 | Mehrvar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161337 | Weinman | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030196012 | Wolrich et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210574 | Wolrich et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030231635 | Kalkunte et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040039895 | Wolrich et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040052269 | Hooper et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054880 | Bernstein et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059828 | Hooper et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073728 | Wolrich et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040073778 | Adiletta et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085901 | Hooper et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040098496 | Wolrich et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109369 | Wolrich et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148382 | Narad et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040162933 | Adiletta et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040252686 | Hooper et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050033884 | Wolrich et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050149665 | Wolrich et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060007871 | Welin | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060069882 | Wheeler et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060156303 | Hooper et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 379 709 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 464 715 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0 633 678 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0 633 678 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0 745 933 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0 773 648 | May 1997 | EP |
0 809 180 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0 959 602 | Nov 1999 | EP |
2327784 | Feb 1999 | GB |
59111533 | Jun 1984 | JP |
WO 9415287 | Jul 1994 | WO |
WO 9738372 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 9820647 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 9909469 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 0038376 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0056024 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0115718 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0116718 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0116769 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0116770 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0116782 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0117179 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0131856 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0148596 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0148606 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0148619 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0150247 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0150679 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 03030461 | Apr 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040071152 A1 | Apr 2004 | US |