Method and apparatus for implementing space frequency block coding in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing wireless communication system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10630427
  • Patent Number
    10,630,427
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, December 28, 2017
    6 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 21, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
The present invention is related to a method and apparatus for implementing space frequency block coding (SFBC) in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) wireless communication system. A wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) including a transceiver and a processor is configured to receive, via the transceiver, an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signal, wherein the OFDM signal comprises a channel coded data stream that was space frequency block coding (SFBC) encoded such that the SFBC encoding was performed using a plurality of pairs of OFDM sub-carriers. The processor is further configured to decode the OFDM signal.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention is related to wireless communication systems. More particularly, the present invention is related to a method and apparatus for implementing space frequency block coding (SFBC) in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) wireless communication system.


BACKGROUND

OFDM is a data transmission scheme where data is split into a plurality of smaller streams and each stream is transmitted using a sub-carrier with a smaller bandwidth than the total available transmission bandwidth. The efficiency of OFDM depends on choosing these sub-carriers orthogonal to each other. The sub-carriers do not interfere with each other while each carrying a portion of the total user data.


OFDM system has advantages over other wireless communication systems. When the user data is split into streams carried by different sub-carriers, the effective data rate on each subcarrier is much smaller. Therefore, the symbol duration is much larger. A large symbol duration can tolerate larger delay spreads. In other words, it is not affected by multipath as severely. Therefore, OFDM symbols can tolerate delay spreads without complicated receiver designs. However, typical wireless systems need complex channel equalization schemes to combat multipath fading.


Another advantage of OFDM is that the generation of orthogonal sub-carriers at the transmitter and receiver can be done by using inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) and fast Fourier transform (FFT) engines. Since the IFFT and FFT implementations are well known, OFDM can be implemented easily and does not require complicated receivers.


Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) refers to the type of wireless transmission and reception scheme where both a transmitter and a receiver employ more than one antenna. A MIMO system takes advantage of the spatial diversity or spatial multiplexing and improves signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and increases throughput.


SFBC is a scheme for transmitting symbols of a space diversity coding on neighboring subcarriers rather than on the same subcarrier in the successive time slots. The SFBC avoids the problem of fast time variations in space time block coding. However, the channel needs to be constant over the subcarriers that combining takes place.


SUMMARY

The present invention is related to a method and apparatus for implementing space frequency block coding (SFBC) in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) wireless communication system. The present invention is applicable to both a closed loop mode and an open loop mode. In the closed loop mode, power loading and eigen-beamforming are performed based on channel state information (CSI). A channel coded data stream is multiplexed into two or more data streams. Power loading is performed based on the CSI on each of the multiplexed data streams. SFBC encoding is performed on the data streams for each of the paired subcarriers. Then, eigen-beamforming is performed based on the CSI to calculate eigenbeams over multiple transmit antennas. The power loading may be performed on two or more SFBC encoding blocks or on each eigenmodes. Additionally, the power loading may be performed across subcarriers or subcarrier groups for weak eigenmodes.


In accordance with the present invention, a robust channel estimation can be provided in all channel conditions, with or without channel information feedback, and low complexity is achieved at both transmitter and receiver. In addition, scalable solution can be used with any antenna configuration and backward compatibility is provided with enhanced performance with 802.11a/g.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an OFDM-MIMO system, implementing a closed loop mode.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system implementing open loop.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a transmitter for depicting power loading.



FIG. 4 is a diagram of an exemplary power loading and adaptive modulation and coding mapping between two pairs of modes.



FIG. 5 shows an example of pairing of subcarrier groups for power/bit loading.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Hereafter, the terminology “station” (STA) includes but is not limited to a user equipment, a wireless transmit/receive unit, a fixed or mobile subscriber unit, a pager, or any other type of device capable of operating in a wireless environment. When referred to hereafter, the terminology “access point” (AP) includes but is not limited to a Node-B, a base station, a site controller or any other type of interfacing device in a wireless environment.


The present invention will be described with reference to the drawing figures wherein like numerals represent like elements throughout. It should be noted that figures provided in the present invention are high level functional block diagrams and the functions implemented by the functional blocks may be implemented by more or less blocks. The features of the present invention may be incorporated into an integrated circuit (IC) or be configured in a circuit comprising a multitude of interconnecting components.


Embodiments of the present invention provide a transmitter implementing SFBC MIMO coding and receiver matched filter. Embodiments also provide transmitter channel precoding and receiver antenna processing as well as channel decomposition functions.


There are two modes of operation of the system: a closed loop and an open loop. The closed loop is used when channel state information (CSI) is available to the transmitter. The open loop is used when CSI is not available. A variant may be used for transmission to legacy STA where it provides diversity benefits.


In the closed loop mode, CSI is used to create virtual independent channels by decomposing and diagonalizing the channel matrix and by precoding at the transmitter. Given the eigenvalue spread of TGn channels the present invention employs a space-frequency orthogonal MIMO coding in the transmitter at the input to the channel precoder to increase robustness at the cost of decreasing data rate. Any coding scheme in MIMO has to deal with the diversity versus multiplexing gain trade off. It is desirable to have a trade off scheme that is best suited to particular channel statistics. An SFBC is chosen due to low mobility and the long coherence time of the channel. This scheme allows for receiver implementation simpler than a MMSE receiver. The combined solution enables higher throughput over a larger range. Embodiments of the present invention allow for per subcarrier power/bit loading and maintains a sustained robust link through closed loop operation with channel state feedback. Another potential benefit is that it is easily scalable to any number of antennas at both transmitter and receiver.


The CSI can be obtained at the transmitter either by feedback from the receiver or through exploiting channel reciprocity. Channel reciprocity is useful for mainly TDD based systems. In this case it is possible for the transmitter and receiver to independently estimate and decompose the channel. The channel update rate can be lowered when the SNR is high resulting in a reduced feedback bandwidth load. Latency requirements and feedback data rates are typically not significant to the inherent frequency non-selectivity of eigenvalues.


The closed loop mode requires calibrations of the transmitter to compensate amplitude and phase difference of the estimated channels in the uplink and downlink directions. This is done infrequently, for example during STA association or under application control, and can use channel reciprocity for the estimation of the channel at both ends. In addition, a CQI (or SNR) per eigen-beam is fed back to the transmitter to support adaptive rate control.



FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an OFDM-MIMO system 100 implementing a closed loop mode. The system 100 comprises a transmitter 110 and a receiver 130. The transmitter 110 comprises a channel encoder 112, a multiplexer 114, a power loading unit 116, a plurality of SFBC encoding units 118, a plurality of serial-to-parallel (S/P) converters 120, a plurality of eigen-beamformers 122, a plurality of IFFT units 124 and a plurality of transmit antennas (not shown). The channel encoder 112 encodes data preferably in accordance with a channel quality indicator (CQI) which is sent from the receiver 130. The CQI is used to determine a coding rate and modulation scheme per sub-carrier or group of sub-carriers. The coded data stream is multiplexed by the multiplexer 114 into two or more data streams.


The transmit power level of each data stream is adjusted by the power loading unit 116 based on feedback. The power loading unit 116 adjusts power levels with respect to the data rate of each eigenbeam to balance the total transmit power over all eigenbeams (or sub-carriers), which will be explained in detail below.


The SFBC encoding units 118 perform SFBC encoding on the data streams. SFBC encoding is done over eigen-beams and sub-carriers for each data rate that is transmitted. Eigen-beam and sub-carrier pairs are selected to ensure independent channels. OFDM symbols are carried on K sub-carriers. To accommodate SFBC, the sub-carriers are divided into L pairs of sub-carriers (or group of sub-carriers). The bandwidth of each group of sub-carriers should be less than the coherence bandwidth of the channel. However, when combined with eigen-beamforming this restriction is relaxed due to the frequency insensitivity of the eigen-beams.


The pairs of sub-carrier groups used by the block code are considered independent. The following is an example of the Alamouti type SFBC applied to an OFDM symbol:






S
=


[




s
1




-

s
2
*







s
2




s
1
*




]

.





Once the SFBC encoding units 118 construct OFDM symbols for all sub-carriers, the coded blocks are multiplexed by the S/P converters 120 and input to the eigen-beamformers 122. The eigen-beamformers 122 distribute the eigenbeams to the transmit antennas. The IFFT units 124 convert the data in frequency domain to the data in time domain.


The receiver 130 comprises a plurality of receive antennas (not shown), a plurality of FFT units 132, eigen-beamformers 134, SFBC decoding units 136, a combiner 138, a channel decoder 144, a channel estimator 140, a CSI generator 142 and a CQI generator 146.


The FFT units 132 convert the received samples to frequency domain and the eigen-beamformer 134, the SFBC decoding unit 136 and a channel decoder 144 perform the opposite operation which is performed at the transmitter 110. The combiner 138 combines the SFBC decoding results using maximal ratio combining (MRC).


The channel estimator 140 generates channel matrix using a training sequence transmitted from the transmitter and decomposes the channel matrix into two beam-forming unitary matrices U and V, (U for transmit and V for receive), and a diagonal matrix D per sub-carrier (or per sub-carrier group) by singular value decomposition (SVD) or eigenvalue decomposition. The CSI generator 142 generates CSI from the channel estimation results and the CQI generator generates a CQI based on the decoding results. The CSI and the CQI are sent back to the transmitter 110.


The channel matrix H between nT transmit antennas and nR receive antennas can be written as follows:






H
=

[




h
11




h
21







h

1
,
nT







h
21




h
22







h

2
,
nT

























h

nR
,
1





h

nR
,
2








h

nR
,
nT





]





The channel matrix H is decomposed by SVD as follows:

H=UDVH,

where U and V are unitary matrices and D is a diagonal matrix. U∈CnR×nR and V∈CnT×nT. Then, for transmit symbol vector s, transmit precoding is simply performed as follows:

x=Vs(transmitted signal).


The received signal becomes as follows:

y=HVs+n,

where n is the noise introduced in the channel. The receiver completes the decomposition by using a matched filter:

VHHH=VHVDHUH=DHUH.


After normalizing channel gain for eigenbeams, the estimate of the transmit symbols s becomes










s
^

=




α






D
H



U
H


HVs

+
η







=



s
+

η
.









s is detected without having to perform successive interference cancellation or MMSE type detector. DHD is a diagonal matrix that is formed by eigenvalues of H across the diagonal. Therefore, the normalization factor α=D−2. U are eigenvectors of HHH, V are eigenvectors of HHH and D is a diagonal matrix of singular values of H (square roots of eigenvalues of HHH).



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system 200 implementing open loop mode in accordance with the present invention. The system 200 comprises a transmitter 210 and a receiver 230. In the open loop mode, a combination of space-frequency coding and spatial spreading in the transmitter 210 provides diversity without requiring CSI. A variant of this scheme can be used when operating with legacy 802.11a/g STAs.


The transmitter 210 comprises a channel encoder 212, a multiplexer 214, a power loading unit 216, a plurality of SFBC encoding units 218, a plurality of serial-to-parallel (S/P) converters 220, a beamformer network (BFN) 222, a plurality of IFFT units 224 and a plurality of transmit antennas 226. As in the closed loop mode, the channel encoder 212 uses CQI to determine coding rate and modulation per sub-carrier or group of sub-carriers. The coded data stream is multiplexed by the multiplexer 214 into two or more data streams.


In the open loop, the eigen-beamformer is replaced with the Beam Forming Network (BFN) 222. The BFN 22 forms N beams in space, where N is the number of antennas 226. The beams are pseudo-randomly constructed by the BFN matrix operation. The independent sub-carrier groups used for the SFBC coding are transmitted on individual beams.


For legacy support, SFBC coding may not be performed. Instead diversity through beam permutation is performed which improves diversity and therefore the performance of legacy 802.11a/g equipment.


The receiver 230 comprises receive antennas 231, FFT units 232, a BFN 234, an SFBC decoding and combining unit 236 and a channel decoder 238. The FFT units 232 convert the received signal in time domain to the signal in frequency domain. The SFBC decoding and combining unit 236 decodes and combines symbols received from sub-carrier groups/eigen-beams and converts them from parallel to serial using a prior knowledge of the constellation size. Symbols are combined using MRC. The channel decoder 238 decodes the combined symbol and generates a CQI.


A first embodiment of power loading is explained hereinafter. The spatial processing is a combination of space-frequency coding and eigen-beamforming. This is performed to give the best compromise between the redundancy gains that SFBC affords and the spatial multiplexing that the eigen-beamformer provides. The power loading scheme operates across the eigen-modes of the channel matrix. However, SFBC also introduces the constraint that the outputs of the coder have the same power loading no matter what the input power loading is due to the cross-operation inside the coder.



FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a transmitter 110 for depicting power loading. FIG. 3 illustrates 4×4 case as an example and the first embodiment of the power loading scheme will be explained with reference to 4×4 case. However, it should be noted that the 4×4 case can be extended to any other cases.


For a particular subcarrier k, four streams of data are mapped to 2 pairs of power loading/AMC modes. In other words the modulation order is selected the same for each pair of inputs. This is later mapped to pairs of eigenmodes. Output of the power loading unit 116 is applied to the dual 2×2 SFBC encoding units 118 and then passed on to the eigen-beamformer 122. The eigen-beamformer 122 maps the inputs to the eigen-modes of the channel through the preprocessing.


For all K subcarriers, the eigenvalues of the channel matrix are known at the transmitter. The channel energy for each eigenmode is defined as follows:








α
i

=




k
=
1

K










λ

i
,
k




2



,





where λi,k is the i-th eigenvalue for the k-th subcarrier's channel. Two SNIRs are defined for two coupled eigenmodes as follows:







β

mod





1


=





i
=
1


M
/
2












α
i



2






and






β

mod





2




=




i
=


M
/
2

+
1


M










α
i



2








where M is the number of eigenmodes. In other words, the eigenmodes are grouped such that half of the eigenmodes with the largest channel energy (or SNIR) are in one group and the other half with the weakest channel energies are in the other. Therefore, the harmonic SNIRs represent the total channel energy of the stronger and weaker eigenmodes. Channel energy is an indication of how robust the eigenmodes and hence the signal that is carried over these eigenmodes would be. This information is used to apply different adaptive modulation and coding (AMC) and/or different power loading for each half as is explained in more detail subsequently. The separation of the coupled SNIRs are defined as follows:

Δβmod1−βmod2


During the closed loop operation the transmitter 110 has the knowledge of current CSI from which it extracts the eigenvalues and preprocessing matrix. The transmitter 110 also infers the data rate that can be supported in the link, Rb, from the CSI. Then, power loading for a given, acceptable, CQI is an optimization between the number of bits that can be sent per OFDM symbol and the type of modulation that is to be used for each mode.


Using the channel energy calculated for eigenmode i as explained above, the maximum bit rate that can be supported for the channel condition is determined. Then, using the mode separation calculation above it is determined how the bit rate needs to be distributed between the two pairs of modes. FIG. 4 is a diagram of an exemplary power loading and adaptive modulation and coding mapping between two pairs of modes. In this example, the bit rate that can be supported is 24 bits per OFDM symbol for the particular sub-carrier. The lowest modulation order satisfying the bit rate is found in FIG. 4 as indicated by the dashed arrow. In this example, first and second modes (first pair of coupled modes) will be using 16 QAM and third and fourth modes (second pair of coupled modes) will be using 256 QAM.


Note that this mapping is described for one CQI that is acceptable and for one subcarrier. In the case of alternative MIMO configurations, such as 2×4, 2×2, etc, the same power loading scheme is applicable except that the total number of bits in the table entries are scaled down to represent the transmit capability and that power loading can be done on a single pair of modes.


A power loading scheme in, accordance with a second embodiment is explained hereinafter. The eigenvalues per subcarrier (λ1(k)>λ2(k)> . . . >λnT(k)) are ranked and eigenbeams (E1, E2, . . . , EnT) are created by grouping the same ranked eigenvalues for all subcarriers as follows:

E1={λ1(1),λ1(2), . . . ,λ1(K)} for i=1,2, . . . ,nT,

where K is the number of subcarriers, nT is the number of transmit antennas and λi(j) is the i-th eigenvalue of the j-th subcarrier. nT is an even number.


The average of the eigenvalues per eigenbeam are computed as follows:








λ
av
i

=



1
K






j
=
1

K









λ
i



(
j
)







for





i



=
1


,
2
,





,

nT
.





The eigenbeams are paired to create Alamouti space-frequency blocks, such as {E1, E2}1, {E3, E4}2, . . . , {E2i-1, E2i}i . . . {EnT-1, EnT}nT/2. However, if the SNR of a pair is greater than SNRmax, then the second eigenbeam of the pair is replaced with the eigenbeam with the next lower eigenvalue average until its SNR is less than or equal to SNRmin.

SNR(i)=(λaviavi+1)/σn2,

where σn2 is the noise variance and SNRmin is the minimum required SNR for the highest data rate for a required quality of service. This step is repeated until all the eigenbeams are paired. FIG. 5 shows an example of pairing of subcarrier groups for power/bit loading.


A data rate for each pair of eigenbeams are determined by mapping the SNR of a pair to the data rate for a given quality. The required SNRs may be adjusted for all pairs of eigenbeams to compensate for the measurement errors and make the total transmit power be constant.


A weight vector per pair of eigenbeams per subcarrier may be computed as follows:









w
k



(

i
,
j

)


=




SNR


(
i
)




σ
n
2



2



λ
i



(
j
)






,





where i is the i-th pair of eigenbeams, j is the j-th subcarrier.


In accordance with the third embodiment, in addition to the first or second embodiment, another power loading is applied across the sub-carriers or group of sub-carriers for weak eigen-modes. In other word, instead of power loading being applied to all eigenmodes it can be applied only to those that are weaker and hence can benefit from the power loading the most. In such a case, those eigenmodes that are not power loaded can still have SFBC or other coding or can have different AMC settings individually, whereas those eigenmodes that power loaded share the same AMC setting for instance. Also, the eigenmodes of the channel are always ordered in power, from strongest to weakest. By pairing eigenmodes of similar power one may improve the power loading of the channel.


A spatial processing scheme is configurable to any number of receive and transmit antenna combinations. Depending on the number of antennas on each side, a combination of SFBC and eigen-beamforming options are used. The table below summarizes the various configurations supported and the state of the spatial processing and power loading that is applicable to each scenario.











TABLE 1





Antenna Configuration
Space Frequency
Eigen-


(Tx × Rx)
Block Code
Beamforming







M × N (M, N ≠ 1)
M/2 block codes
M beams at Tx




N beams at Rcv


1 × N (N ≠ 1)
not used
To be determined by




receiver vendor


M × 1 (M ≠ 1)
M/2 block codes
M beams at Tx









Although the features and elements of the present invention are described in the preferred embodiments in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone without the other features and elements of the preferred embodiments or in various combinations with or without other features and elements of the present invention.

Claims
  • 1. A wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) comprising: a transceiver; anda processor configured to:send channel quality information (CQI), wherein the CQI is sent on a per group of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) sub-carrier basis;receive, via the transceiver, an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signal over a set of OFDM subcarriers, wherein the OFDM signal comprises a channel coded data stream that was space frequency block coding (SFBC) encoded such that the SFBC encoding was performed for a plurality of pairs of OFDM sub-carriers comprised from the set of OFDM sub-carriers to be used in a transmission; anddecode the OFDM signal.
  • 2. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein a first pair of OFDM sub-carriers of an OFDM symbol is mapped to a first pair of antenna ports and a second pair of OFDM sub-carriers of the OFDM symbol is mapped to a second pair of antenna ports; and wherein a portion of the channel coded data stream that is SFBC encoded for the first pair of OFDM sub-carriers of the OFDM symbol is SFBC encoded independently of another portion of the channel coded data stream that is SFBC encoded for the second pair of OFDM sub-carriers of the OFDM symbol.
  • 3. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein the channel-coded data stream is SFBC encoded independently for each of the pairs of OFDM sub-carriers.
  • 4. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein the CQI corresponds to feedback for selecting a coding rate and modulation type used for the channel coded data stream.
  • 5. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein the WTRU does not provide channel state information (CSI) to a transmitter that transmits the OFDM symbol when operating in an open loop mode.
  • 6. The WTRU of claim 5, wherein the CSI corresponds to feedback for a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel.
  • 7. The WTRU of claim 5, wherein the transmitter is a base station.
  • 8. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein each portion of the channel coded data stream that is SFBC encoded for a pair of OFDM sub-carriers is encoded using an Alamouti type SFBC code.
  • 9. The WTRU of claim 1, wherein the OFDM sub-carriers are mapped to at least four antenna ports.
  • 10. A method performed by a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU), the method comprising: sending channel quality information (CQI), wherein the CQI is sent on a per group of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) sub-carrier basis;receiving an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signal over a set of OFDM subcarriers, wherein the OFDM signal comprises a channel coded data stream that was space frequency block coding (SFBC) encoded such that the SFBC encoding was performed for a plurality of pairs of OFDM sub-carriers comprised from the set of OFDM sub-carriers to be used in a transmission; anddecoding the OFDM signal.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein a first pair of OFDM sub-carriers of an OFDM symbol is mapped to a first pair of antenna ports and a second pair of OFDM sub-carriers of the OFDM symbol is mapped to a second pair of antenna ports; and wherein a portion of the channel coded data stream that is SFBC encoded for the first pair of OFDM sub-carriers of the OFDM symbol is SFBC encoded independently of another portion of the channel coded data stream that is SFBC encoded for the second pair of OFDM sub-carriers of the OFDM symbol.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the channel-coded data stream is SFBC encoded independently for each of the pairs of OFDM sub-carriers.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the CQI corresponds to feedback for selecting a coding rate and modulation type used for the channel coded data stream.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the WTRU does not provide channel state information (CSI) to a transmitter that transmits the OFDM symbol when operating in an open loop mode.
  • 15. The method of claim 10, wherein each portion of the channel coded data stream that is SFBC encoded for a pair of OFDM sub-carriers is encoded using an Alamouti type SFBC code.
  • 16. A wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU) comprising: a transceiver; anda processor configured to:receive, via the transceiver, at least one beamformed transmission comprising an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) signal, wherein the OFDM signal comprises a channel coded data stream that was space frequency block coding (SFBC) encoded such that the SFBC encoding was performed independently across each of a plurality of pairs of OFDM sub-carriers; anddecode the OFDM signal.
  • 17. The WTRU of claim 16, wherein the processor is further configured to: send channel quality information (CQI), wherein the CQI is sent on a per group of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) sub-carrier basis.
  • 18. The WTRU of claim 17, wherein a coding rate and modulation type used for the channel coded data stream is selected on a per group of OFDM sub-carrier basis based on the sent CQI.
  • 19. The WTRU of claim 16, wherein each portion of the channel coded data stream that is SFBC encoded for a pair of OFDM sub-carriers is encoded using an Alamouti type SFBC code.
  • 20. The WTRU of claim 16, wherein the processor is further configured to: send channel quality information (CQI) and channel state information (CSI), wherein the CQI corresponds to feedback for modulation and coding rate and the CSI corresponds to feedback for a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/433,011, filed Feb. 15, 2017, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,887,808 on Feb. 6, 2018, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/061,703, filed Mar. 4, 2016, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,608,772 on Mar. 28, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/695,989, filed Apr. 24, 2015, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,306,702 on Apr. 5, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/021,783, filed Sep. 9, 2013, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,054,924 on Jun. 9, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/360,315, filed Jan. 27, 2009, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,532,210 on Sep. 10, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/201,695, filed Aug. 11, 2005, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,505,529 on Mar. 17, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/601,338 filed Aug. 12, 2004, which are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.

US Referenced Citations (81)
Number Name Date Kind
5787133 Marchetto et al. Jul 1998 A
6351499 Paulraj et al. Feb 2002 B1
6452981 Raleigh et al. Sep 2002 B1
6473467 Wallace et al. Oct 2002 B1
6493331 Walton et al. Dec 2002 B1
6519279 Abdesselem et al. Feb 2003 B1
6594473 Dabak et al. Jul 2003 B1
6597137 Griepentrog et al. Jul 2003 B1
6747584 Havelock Jun 2004 B2
6859503 Pautler et al. Feb 2005 B2
7002900 Walton et al. Feb 2006 B2
7116944 Das et al. Oct 2006 B2
7123887 Kim et al. Oct 2006 B2
7194040 Menon et al. Mar 2007 B2
7197081 Saito Mar 2007 B2
7215927 Miyoshi May 2007 B2
7308035 Rouquette et al. Dec 2007 B2
7315577 Shao Jan 2008 B2
7379492 Hwang May 2008 B2
7440510 Sandhu et al. Oct 2008 B2
7453947 Kim et al. Nov 2008 B2
7499709 Das et al. Mar 2009 B2
7535969 Catreux et al. May 2009 B2
7606204 Sebastian et al. Oct 2009 B2
7613233 Hottinen Nov 2009 B2
7688899 Ketchum et al. Mar 2010 B2
7715485 Schlegel et al. May 2010 B1
7813440 Yamada et al. Oct 2010 B2
7929632 Shao Apr 2011 B2
7929994 Kishigami et al. Apr 2011 B2
8130855 Kwak et al. Mar 2012 B2
8218609 Walton et al. Jul 2012 B2
8254335 Nishio et al. Aug 2012 B2
8423044 Lee et al. Apr 2013 B2
9094188 Xu et al. Jul 2015 B2
20010033623 Hosur Oct 2001 A1
20020122383 Wu et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020191535 Sugiyama et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030003863 Thielecke et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030043071 Lilly et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030050086 Lee et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030073464 Giannakis et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030103584 Bjerke et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030108117 Ketchum et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030133524 Miller et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030148770 Das et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030156572 Hui et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030185309 Pautler et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030218793 Soneda et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030218973 Oprea et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030220634 Ryba et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030231706 Hwang Dec 2003 A1
20040014431 Lo Jan 2004 A1
20040032910 Horng et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040066761 Giannakis et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040072594 Hwang et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040081073 Walton et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040082356 Walton et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040114506 Chang et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040120347 Lee et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040120416 Pauli et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040132496 Kim Jul 2004 A1
20040192218 Oprea Sep 2004 A1
20050002325 Giannakis et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050047517 Georgios et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050058212 Shao Mar 2005 A1
20050058217 Sandhu Mar 2005 A1
20050128936 Shao Jun 2005 A1
20050157683 Ylitalo et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050239488 Ebiko Oct 2005 A1
20050254596 Naguib Nov 2005 A1
20050265475 Sun Dec 2005 A1
20050287978 Maltsev et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060176977 Jafarkhani et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070217538 Waxman Sep 2007 A1
20080108310 Tong et al. May 2008 A1
20080144733 ElGamal et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080285670 Walton et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090117911 Molisch et al. May 2009 A1
20100166100 Medvedev et al. Jul 2010 A1
20140219207 Lee et al. Aug 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (55)
Number Date Country
2415632 Jan 2002 CA
1448015 Oct 2003 CN
1469662 Jan 2004 CN
1496625 May 2004 CN
1501595 Jun 2004 CN
1502180 Jun 2004 CN
1520063 Aug 2004 CN
10162546 Jul 2003 DE
10162548 Jul 2003 DE
1207661 May 2002 EP
1241824 Sep 2002 EP
1282245 Feb 2003 EP
1283614 Feb 2003 EP
1367760 Dec 2003 EP
1408623 Apr 2004 EP
1445886 Aug 2004 EP
2001-044900 Feb 2001 JP
2001-505723 Apr 2001 JP
2003-018127 Jan 2003 JP
2003-169036 Jun 2003 JP
2003-347979 Dec 2003 JP
2004-502376 Jan 2004 JP
2004-064108 Feb 2004 JP
2004-166232 Jun 2004 JP
2004-173258 Jun 2004 JP
2004-179821 Jun 2004 JP
2004-207901 Jul 2004 JP
2004-208234 Jul 2004 JP
2004-215254 Jul 2004 JP
2006-504366 Feb 2006 JP
2007-506307 Mar 2007 JP
512602 Dec 2002 TW
513363 Dec 2002 TW
567689 Dec 2003 TW
567696 Dec 2003 TW
567701 Dec 2003 TW
WO 2002005506 Jan 2002 WO
WO 2002007371 Jan 2002 WO
WO 2001097327 May 2002 WO
WO 2002049306 Jun 2002 WO
WO 2002078211 Oct 2002 WO
WO 2002082689 Oct 2002 WO
WO 2003015335 Feb 2003 WO
WO 2003056742 Jul 2003 WO
WO 2003084092 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2003085875 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2004036768 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004038986 May 2004 WO
WO 2004038987 May 2004 WO
WO 2004077734 Sep 2004 WO
WO 2005008944 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005029758 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005029759 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005036847 Apr 2005 WO
WO 2006016485 Feb 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (17)
Entry
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), R1-031040, “Advantages of Group-Wise Antenna Selective Transmit Diversity Scheme”, Samsung, 3GPP TSG-RAN-1 Meeting #34, Seoul, Korea, Oct. 6-9, 2003, 5 pages.
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), TR 25.814 V0.1.0, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network, Physical Layer Aspects for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (UTRA) (Release 7)”, Jun. 2005, pp. 1-10.
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), TSG-R1 (01) 0879, “Increasing MIMO Throughput with Per-Antenna Rate Control”, Lucent Technologies, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1, 2001,pp. 1-13.
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), TSG-R1 (02) 0570, “Per Stream Rate Control With Code Reuse TxAA and APP Decoding for HSDPA”, Lucent Technologies, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1, Paris, France, Apr. 9-12, 2002, pp. 1-4.
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), TSGR1#31 R1-030212, “DSTTD with Sub-Group Rate Control”, Mitsubishi Electric, 3GPP TSG RAN WG 1 #31 Tokyo, Japan, Feb. 18-21, 2003, pp. 1-10.
3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), TSGR1#35 R1-031284, “DSTTD with Sub-Group Rate Control”, Mitsubishi Electric, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #35 Lisboa, Portugal, Nov. 17-21, 2003, pp. 1-5.
Badic et al., “Extended Alamouti Codes in Correlated Channels Using Partial Feedback”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 2, Jun. 20-24, 2004, pp. 896-900.
Gao et al., “On Implementation of Bit-Loading Algorithms for OFDM Systems with Multiple-Input Multiple-Output”, IEEE 56th Conference on Vehicular Technology, vol. 1, 2002, pp. 199-203.
Kaiser et al. “Space Frequency Block Codes and Code Division Multiplexing in OFDM Systems”, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, vol. 4, Dec. 1-5, 2003, pp. 2360-2364.
Lihua et al., “A Practice Space-Frequency Block Coded OFDM Scheme for Fast Fading Broadband Channels”, 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Sep. 18, 2002, 6 pages.
Lihua et al., “SFBC-AOFDM Scheme in Fast and Frequency Selective Fading Scenarios”, 14th IEEE Proceedings on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, vol. 2, Sep. 2003, pp. 1949-1953.
Lin et al., “STBC for Wireless Communication: a Least Square Interpretation”, Proceedings IEEE Region 10 Conference on Computers, Communications, Control and Power Engineering, vol. 2, Oct. 28-31, 2002, pp. 972-975.
Ma et al., “An EM-Based Channel Estimation Algorithm for Space-Time and Space-Frequency Block Coded OFDM”, Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal, vol. 4, 2003, pp. 389-392.
Okamoto et al., “SFBC-OFDM Decoding Schemes for IEEE 802.11 g Based WLAN System”, Proceedings of the IEICE General Conference, The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, Mar. 8, 2004, 5 pages.
Rouquette et al., “Orthogonal Full Diversity Space-Time Block Coding Based on Transmit Channel State Information for 4 Tx Antennas”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, vol. 1, Apr. 28-May 2, 2002, pp. 558-562.
Torabi et al., “Variable-Rate OFDM Systems with Selective Antenna Diversity and Adaptive Modulation”, 57th IEEE Spectrum Vehicular Technology Conference, vol. 1, Apr. 22-25, 2003, pp. 562-566.
Xia et al., “Adaptive MIMO-OFDM Based on Partial Channel State Information”, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 52, No. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 202-213.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20180205500 A1 Jul 2018 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60601338 Aug 2004 US
Continuations (6)
Number Date Country
Parent 15433011 Feb 2017 US
Child 15856991 US
Parent 15061703 Mar 2016 US
Child 15433011 US
Parent 14695989 Apr 2015 US
Child 15061703 US
Parent 14021783 Sep 2013 US
Child 14695989 US
Parent 12360351 Jan 2009 US
Child 14021783 US
Parent 11201695 Aug 2005 US
Child 12360351 US