Not applicable
Not applicable
As the general public continues to increase its willingness to recycle, there are a variety of reasons that would lead to the desire for a container sorting system having improved efficiency. Currently available sorting system are plagued with many shortcomings. Traditional sorting systems use sensing devices which are bulky and have traditionally been configured to sort materials with a conveyor belt as a backdrop. Sensing systems in this configuration receive signals from the conveyor belt as well as from the items to be sorted which can complicate the identification of items. The traditional configuration of sorting systems also has resulted in a significant distance being present between the sensing region and the sorting region of a system. Given that many of the items being sorted are light weight cylindrically shaped bottles, one can imagine the movement of such individual items on the surface of a rapidly moving conveyor belt. Unfortunately, such lateral movement and variations in acceleration result in a complicated and hard to predict path of travel for such an item as it passes from a sensing region over a significant distance to a sorting region. If the item does not reach the sorting region at the time and location at which it is expected, then the sorting system has failed. The result is that sorting is not being performed in an efficient manner.
Disclosed herein is a container sorting system capable of improved sorting efficiency. As further described herein, the present invention eliminates interference signals from a conveyor belt and also allows for the distance between the sensing region and ejection region of the system to be only a minimal distance. Also disclosed herein is a method of sorting containers by use of the disclosed device.
The sorting device for sorting materials according to composition includes an infrared radiation source, a conveyor, wherein the conveyor has a discharge end, an infrared radiation sensing system positioned to receive and detect infrared radiation reflected off a sample while the sample is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor and is irradiated with infrared radiation from the infrared radiation source, a first processing system operationally connected to the infrared radiation sensing system so that the detected infrared radiation signals are analyzed to determine composition of the sample, an ejection system positioned immediately downstream from the infrared radiation sensing system, a second processing system operationally connected to the ejection system so that sample having certain composition may be ejected out of the flow path by the ejection system, and a receiving station positioned to receive ejected sample. In certain embodiments, the infrared radiation sensing system is located a minimal distance downstream from the discharge end of the conveyor. In other embodiments, the ejection system is located a minimal distance downstream from the infrared radiation sensing system. In yet other embodiments, the first processing system and the second processing system are combined into a single processing system. Also disclosed herein is a sorting device for sorting materials according to composition which includes an infrared radiation source, a conveyor, wherein the conveyor has a discharge end, an infrared radiation sensing system positioned to receive and detect infrared radiation reflected off a sample while the sample is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor and is irradiated with infrared radiation from the infrared radiation source, a processing system operationally connected to the infrared radiation sensing system so that the detected infrared radiation signals are analyzed to determine composition of the sample, an ejection system operationally connected to the processing system so that a sample having a certain composition may be ejected out of the flow path, wherein the ejection system is positioned immediately downstream from the infrared radiation sensing system, and a receiving station positioned to receive ejected sample. In certain embodiments, the device further includes a transmission infrared radiation source positioned so that the infrared radiation sensing system receives and detects infrared radiation transmitted through the sample while the sample is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor and is irradiated with infrared radiation from the transmission infrared radiation source.
Also disclosed herein is a method of sensing and sorting materials according to composition which includes providing a sample, placing the sample on a conveyor having a discharge end, placing the sample in an infrared radiation sensing region, wherein the infrared radiation sensing region is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor, irradiating the sample to be sorted with infrared radiation in the sensing region, detecting infrared radiation signals reflected off the sample while the sample is in the sensing region, analyzing the infrared radiation signals to determine composition of the sample, and energizing at least one air ejector of an air ejection array, wherein the air ejection array is located immediately downstream from the infrared radiation sensing region. In certain embodiments, the infrared radiation sensing region is located at a minimal distance from the discharge end of the conveyor. In other embodiments, the air ejection array is located at a minimal distance downstream from the infrared radiation sensing region. In still other embodiments, the method further includes detecting infrared radiation signals transmitted through the sample while the sample is in the sensing region.
Accordingly, one object of the present invention is to provide a sorting system having only a minimal distance between the sensing region and the ejection region.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a sorting system having an improved sorting efficiency. Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a sorting system that minimizes interference signals from a conveyor belt surface.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method of sorting containers that does not require regular cleaning of a conveyor belt surface.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a method of sorting containers that does not pose a fire hazard to the facility in which the sorting system is located.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a sorting system having the capability to sort with reflected infrared radiation, transmission infrared radiation, or both.
The present invention is an infrared radiation sorting system that overcomes the flaws of currently available reflective infrared sorting systems. The infrared radiation sorting system, referred to as the system 10, includes an infrared radiation source 12, conveyor 14, infrared radiation sensing system 16, first processing system 18, second processing system 20, an ejection system 22, and a receiving station 24. Also disclosed herein is a method of using the system 10 to more efficiently sort materials according to composition.
Currently available material sorting systems that operate in the near infrared range (1.0-2.5 microns) and sense infrared radiation reflected off a material item (such as a plastic bottle) operate in a configuration where the sensing system is positioned over a conveyor 14 belt, as best seen in
Another disadvantage of current systems is that if the conveyed item has a lateral velocity component then it can move into an adjacent region on the conveyor 14 belt upon arrival at the ejection location and be missed by the firing of the air ejectors in the ejection channel directly downstream along the item expected path of travel determined at the time of detection in the sensing region. Stated another way, as best seen in
Still another disadvantage of traditional sorting systems in recycling plants is that there is typically a build up of foreign materials (dirt, grime, liquids, bottle labels, etc.) that occurs on a conveyor 14 belt during operation. This build up of foreign materials can interfere with the reflected infrared radiation signals 38 being received by the infrared radiation sensing system 16 and degrade sorting performance. Therefore, it is common for the belt surface to require periodic cleaning as a maintenance item—often once per shift. This cleaning requires manpower and time and is a maintenance cost. Also, in some sorting scenarios it is advantageous to determine color of item along with its infrared radiation signature. Many items to be sorted are transparent such as those made from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or polystyrene (PS). The transparent item may have a color to it such as a green, blue, or amber PET bottle (for example). This color of a transparent item can be difficult for a sensing system 16 to distinguish if the item is on a conveyor 14 belt surface since the belt surface can be seen through the transparent item. For example, it can very hard to “see” the color of a PET bottle on a black conveyor 14 belt surface when lighted from above, especially “clear” bottles or lightly colored bottles such as light blue bottles. Additionally the build up of foreign materials on the belt can interfere with the color analyses degrading color sorting performance. Finally, the infrared radiation source 12 used in these systems is typically one or two banks of highly intense tungsten halogen lamps, positioned on the upstream and/or downstream sides of the infrared radiation sensing system 16, as shown in
Referring now to
As further described below, the ejection system 22 is momentarily activated to eject an item selected for ejection after a delay time that depends upon the conveyor belt speed and the distance D between the sensing region and the ejection location. A typical application is the sorting of containers in a mixed recyclable container stream. The first processing system 18 is a microprocessor. Such a microprocessor may be a single microprocessor or a system of multiple microprocessors linked together to share computational tasks to enable high speed data processing. A suitable multiple microprocessor system is the Barcelona-HS available from Spectrum Signal Processing, Burnaby, Canada. The first processing system 18 is also operationally connected to a second processing system 20. Briefly, the ejection system 22 is controlled by the second processing system 20 which is responsive to information received from the first processing system 18. The second processing system 20 signals the ejection system 22 through connections 32 to selectively energize appropriate air ejectors within the ejection system 22 to deflect by short air blasts selected materials from the sample 28 flow. That is, the first processing system 18 provides and receives control signals to/from the infrared radiation sensing system 16 over an electrical/data connection 30. Data from the infrared sensing system 16 flows to first processing system 18 over connections 30 through an analog-to-digital conversion card so that digital data is presented to first processing system 18. A materials classification and sorting algorithm, or software, executes within the first processing system 18 to process the digital data and utilizes computer memory for storing data and accessing data during execution. According to results derived through executing the algorithm the second processing system 20 signals the ejection system 22, for example a bank of solid state relays such as those supplied by Opto22, Temecula, Calif., through DIO module to energize selected air ejectors within air ejector array of the ejection system 22. In practice it may be that the tasks performed by the first processing system 18 and the second processing system 20 may be performed by a single processor or a system of multiple processors. As best seen in
Still referring to
Referring now to
Still referring to
Disclosed herein is an embodiment of a method of sorting materials in order to overcome the above discussed disadvantages of the configuration shown in
This method has several advantages over currently available sorting methods. First, as described above, the shorter travel distance D compared to the traditional method of using the device shown in
Second, the short travel distance D provided in the currently disclosed method of using the device disclosed herein as compared to the traditional method of using the device shown in
Third, build up of foreign materials on the conveyor 14 do not interfere with the infrared radiation signals 38 being received by the infrared radiation sensing system 16 since the conveyor 14 surface is no longer presented to the infrared radiation sensing system 16. Fourth, interference of the conveyor 14 surface with color determination of transparent items (e.g., PET bottles) is eliminated since the sample 28 being sensed is no longer on the conveyor 14 surface and instead is located off the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14. Fifth, the potential for fire resulting from the intense radiation from the infrared radiation source 12 is minimized since the infrared radiation 36 emanating from the source 12 is directed into the “free air” sensing region, which is off the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14. In the event the conveyor 14 stops, sample 28 will not stop suspended in air in the sensing region but will pass on through due to its intrinsic trajectory. Therefore, there will be no conveyor 14 surface or stationary sample 28 in the irradiated sensing region while the conveyor 14 is stopped or at any other time. Finally, another advantage to the method disclosed herein is the ability to add a transmission infrared radiation source 48 below the sample 28 feed stream as it discharges off the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14. In the examples shown in
This patent application expressly incorporates by reference all patents, references, and publications disclosed herein.
Although the present invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments, it is anticipated that alterations and modifications thereof will no doubt become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore intended that the following claims be interpreted as covering all alterations and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/399,865, filed Jul. 19, 2010, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Improving Performance in Container Sorting” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Be it known that we, Edward J. Sommer, Jr., a United States citizen, residing at 5329 General Forrest Court, Nashville, Tenn. 37215, R. Lynn Conley, a United States citizen, residing at 8045 Maggie Court, Antioch, Tenn. 37013, and Robert H. Parrish, a United States citizen, residing at 8029 Settlers Way, Nashville, Tenn. 37221, have invented a new and useful “Method and Apparatus for Improving Performance in Container Sorting.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4090074 | Watt et al. | May 1978 | A |
4377392 | Massey et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
4486894 | Page et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4626688 | Barnes | Dec 1986 | A |
4848590 | Kelly | Jul 1989 | A |
5176260 | Oder | Jan 1993 | A |
5676256 | Kumar et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5738224 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5818899 | Connolly et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5841832 | Mazess et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841833 | Mazess et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5931308 | Gesing et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
RE36537 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Feb 2000 | E |
6060677 | Ulrichsen et al. | May 2000 | A |
6122343 | Pidcock | Sep 2000 | A |
6128365 | Bechwati et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6266390 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272230 | Hiraoglu et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6338305 | McHenry et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
RE37536 | Barnes | Feb 2002 | E |
6353197 | Ulrichsen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6399951 | Paulus et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6519315 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6545240 | Kumar | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6587575 | Windham et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6610981 | Sommer, Jr. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6661867 | Mario et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6855901 | Guenard et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6888917 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
7012256 | Roos et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7099433 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7200200 | Laurila et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7244941 | Roos et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7262380 | Ulrichsen et al. | Aug 2007 | B1 |
7286634 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7356115 | Ford et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7542873 | Vince et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7558370 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7564943 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7664225 | Klein | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7848484 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
20040066890 | Dalmijn et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20100185319 | Petzold | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110116596 | Sommer, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61399865 | Jul 2010 | US |