Method and apparatus for improving signal quality in implantable hearing systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6689045
  • Patent Number
    6,689,045
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 12, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 10, 2004
    21 years ago
Abstract
An implantable hearing assistance system includes a sensor transducer and an electronics unit. The sensor transducer, such as a piezoelectric transducer, is operatively coupled to an auditory element of the middle ear (e.g., malleus), and electrically connected to the electronics unit. The transducer and the electronics unit are arranged together to minimize the driving impedance and lead capacitance therebetween, thereby minimizing susceptibility to electromagnetic interference and minimizing high audio frequency signal attenuation.In one example, the transducer and the electronics unit are disposed immediately adjacent each other or physically joined together to virtually eliminate (or at least significantly shorten) the length of the electrical connection between the transducer and the electronics unit. In another example, the electronics unit is located remotely from the transducer, and a preamplifier (or other impedance transforming electronics) is placed in close physical proximity to the transducer in the middle ear between the transducer and the remaining electronics unit.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to implantable hearing systems for assisting hearing in hearing-impaired persons. In particular, the present invention relates to improving signal quality in implantable hearing assistance systems by reducing electromagnetic interference and minimizing high frequency audio signal attenuation.




2. Description of Related Art




Some implantable hearing assistance systems use a microphone located in or near the ear to convert acoustic sound energy into an electrical signal. The electric signal is amplified, modulated and then directly communicated by a transducer to the inner ear to stimulate the cochlea to assist hearing. Alternatively, the amplified signal is communicated to a transducer for conversion to mechanical acoustic energy for vibratory application to the stapes of the middle ear or the cochlea. The microphone can be located externally, adjacent the ear, or within the external auditory canal. The transducer is commonly connected to a portion of the middle ear, known as the ossicular chain, which includes the malleus, incus and stapes. Vibrations are emitted from the transducer into and through the ossicular chain to the cochlea of the inner ear.




Electrical connections such as lead wires are used to span the gaps between the transducer and the electronics unit/amplifier. For example,

FIG. 1

illustrates a prior art conventional hearing assistance system with such lead wires. System


10


is implanted into auditory system


11


and includes a sensor transducer


12


, lead wires


14


, and electronics amplifier unit


16


and driver transducer


18


. Transducer


12


is located within the middle ear and operatively coupled to malleus


20


of the middle ear. Lead wires


14


extend from sensor


12


to electronics/amplifier


16


and then to driver transducer


18


, which is operatively coupled to stapes


22


.




When the length of the electrical lead wires


14


becomes significant, system


10


is increasingly susceptible to electromagnetic interference (EMI). EMI is the reception of unwanted electrical signals that are present in the environment at all times. Most EMI is caused by signals at very high frequencies, such as those used in cellular phones (e.g., 900 MHz). Under some conditions these high-frequency signals can cause low-frequency, audible, interference in electronic sound processing devices. A device's susceptibility to EMI is related to the input impedance of the conductor receiving the EMI and to the physical size of that conductor. A large conductor with a high-input impedance will be more susceptible to EMI.




An additional problem encountered when using a high-impedance sensor is the effect of the lead capacitance which it must drive. A larger capacitance will cause high frequency audio signals to be attenuated. For example, a longer lead wire driven by a high-impedance sensor yields a large capacitance, producing high frequency audio signal attenuation.




Since very small changes in signals and acoustics mean large changes in the quality of hearing, even small amounts of EMI and high-frequency attenuation are undesirable. Moreover, with the drive to miniaturize implantable electronic components (e.g., amplifiers, filters, etc.), adding protective mechanisms to defeat EMI is undesirable as these mechanisms would add bulk, cost, and weight to the implantable components.




The importance of restoring hearing to hearing-impaired persons demands more optimal solutions in hearing assistance systems. Ideally, an improved hearing assistance system both minimizes electromagnetic interference and maximizes high-frequency performance without adding unnecessary components to produce a better acoustic signal for reception into the inner ear.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




An implantable hearing assistance system includes a sensor transducer and an electronics unit. The sensor transducer, such as a piezoelectric transducer, is operatively coupled to an auditory element of the middle ear (e.g., malleus), and is electrically connected to the electronics unit. The transducer and the electronics unit are arranged together to minimize the driving impedance and lead capacitance therebetween, thereby minimizing EMI susceptibility and minimizing high audio frequency signal attenuation of the hearing assistance system.




In one example, the transducer and the electronics unit are disposed immediately adjacent each other or physically joined together to virtually eliminate (or at least significantly shorten) the length of the electrical connection between the transducer and the electronics unit. This arrangement effectively prevents high frequency audio signal attenuation associated with lead capacitance of a long-length lead wire and/or associated with a high impedance sensor that drives the lead wire. Eliminating the electrical connection or lead wire minimizes EMI susceptibility since the conductor previously susceptible to EMI has been reduced to having little or no input impedance and little or no physical size. In another example, the electronics unit is located remotely from the transducer and a preamplifier (or other impedance transforming electronics) is placed in close physical proximity to the transducer in the middle ear between the transducer and the remaining electronics unit. This arrangement transforms the impedance from the high impedance sensor to the connecting lead wire so that a significantly smaller impedance is presented to the connecting lead wire. This impedance transformation reduces high frequency audio signal attenuation. Minimizing susceptibility to electromagnetic interference and minimizing high frequency audio signal attenuation with these methods and devices enhances hearing assistance achieved by middle ear implantable hearing assistance devices.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic diagram of a prior art implantable hearing assistance system.





FIG. 2

is a schematic diagram of an implantable hearing assistance method and system of the present invention.





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of the implantable hearing assistance method and system of the present invention.





FIG. 4

is a schematic circuit diagram of an amplifier circuit of the method and system of the present invention.





FIG. 5

is a plan side view of a transducer and amplifier combination of the present invention.





FIG. 6

is a plan side view of an alternative transducer and amplifier combination of the present invention.





FIG. 7

is a plan view of an embodiment of the implantable hearing assistance method and system of the present invention incorporated into a human auditory system.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




A hearing assistance system


30


of the present invention is shown in FIG.


2


. As shown, system


30


includes sensor


32


, lead wire


34


, driver transducer


36


and supplemental electronics unit


37


. Sensor


32


includes known piezoelectronic or electromagnetic bimorph transducer


38


and electronics module


40


mounted on an electrically conductive substrate


42


, although other transducer structures are contemplated within the scope of this invention. Electronics module


40


includes electronic components such as amplifier


44


mounted within housing support


45


(e.g., potting or other formable housing material including plastic, etc.). Electronics unit


44


(or a portion thereof) and wires


48


A,


48


B also can be juxtaposed together so that wires


48


A,


48


B support electronics


44


with or without support


45


, and/or electronics


44


and wires


48


A,


48


B are housed together in a single unit in which the wires house electronics


44


or electronics


44


house a portion of wires


48


A,


48


B. Bimorph transducer


38


includes known elements


46


A and


46


B, while lead wires


48


A and


48


B connect bimorph transducer


38


to electronics components


44


directly as shown, or through substrate


42


(see e.g., FIGS.


5


and


6


). Sensor


32


with amplifier


44


is preferably directly electrically connected to driver transducer


36


, although as shown in phantom, sensor


32


optionally can be electrically connected to supplemental electronics


37


and driver transducer


36


. Supplemental electronics unit


37


includes accessory electronics for augmenting the electronic components


44


of sensor


32


. Sensor


32


including bimorph transducer


38


and electronics module


40


are mounted within the middle ear proximate an auditory element of the ossicular chain, such as malleus


20


as shown for sensor


12


in FIG.


1


.




In this embodiment, electronics module


40


is mechanically fastened directly to bimorph transducer


38


. Electronics component


44


of module


40


includes signal amplification and filtering characteristics, while bimorph transducer


38


includes electrical-to-mechanical transducing characteristics. Of course, these amplification and electrical-to-mechanical transducing characteristics can be obtained in a different configuration of electronics and piezoelectric or electromagnetic components other than the configuration shown. Combining the high impedance bimorph transducer


38


and the high impedance electronics module


40


into a single unit eliminates the possibility of a long lead wire therebetween. This physical juxtaposition of electronics module


40


and bimorph transducer


38


dramatically reduces capacitance driven by the high impedance sensor (thereby maximizing high frequency audio performance) and reduces the length of lead wire picking up EMI (thereby minimizing EMI susceptibility).




For example, the high-frequency effect is inversely proportional to the lead wire length. If the lead wire is made {fraction (1/10)}th as long, the highest working frequency is increased by a factor of 10. For EMI susceptibility, a common rule of thumb is that the length of the lead wire should be kept to {fraction (1/20)}th of the wavelength of the impinging sounds. For 2 GHz signals, which are used in some radio equipment and proposed future telephones, this corresponds to a desired lead wire length of ¾ centimeters. Given these constraints, this rule of thumb is satisfied with the sensor and electronics mechanically fastened together, according to the present invention.




Another embodiment of the present invention includes hearing assistance system


60


, shown in

FIG. 3

, including bimorph transducer


62


, preamplifier


64


, lead wire


66


, and electronics unit


68


with amplifier


70


. Bimorph transducer


62


includes elements


74


A and


74


B with lead wires


76


A and


76


B electrically connecting elements


74


A and


74


B of bimorph transducer


62


to preamplifier


64


. Bimorph transducer


62


and preamplifier


64


are located within the middle ear, particularly with bimorph transducer


62


mechanically or operatively connected to an auditory element of the middle ear such as a stapes, malleus or incus. Preamplifier


64


is directly and mechanically connected to bimorph transducer


62


, or located in close physical proximity thereto, on a mounting bracket or similar support. In one embodiment electronics unit


68


is located within, or adjacent to the middle ear, although certain embodiments may include remote location of this component. Locating high impedance preamplifier


64


in close physical proximity to high impedance bimorph transducer


62


permits electrically connecting lead wires


76


A and


76


B to be extremely short, thereby greatly diminishing the potential for electromagnetic interference and capacitance-based high audio frequency signal attenuation due to long length lead wires. Preamplifier


64


operates in conjunction with electronics unit


68


according to known signal processing principles.




In use, a mechanical acoustic sound energy signal is received at sensor


62


, converted to an electrical signal by sensor


62


, and amplified at preamplifier


64


prior to delivery of the electrical signal to electronics


68


.




Of course, devices or combinations of components other than a preamplifier can act as an impedance transformation device to transform impedance between the high-input impedance sensor and an electrically-connecting lead wire.





FIG. 4

shows one example of implementing preamplifier


64


in conjunction with bimorph transducer


62


of FIG.


3


. As shown in

FIG. 4

, preamplifier


64


includes JFET amplifier circuit


81


, having inputs


82


A and


82


B from bimorph transducer


62


and outputs


86


A,


86


B. Circuit


81


further includes resistors


88


and


90


, and capacitor


92


. Resistors


88


and


90


preferably have impedances of about 4 Mohm and about 400 kohm respectively, while capacitor


92


has a capacitance of about 0.1 Micro F. JFET


84


has nodes


94


A,


94


B and


94


C.




Node


94


A is connected to input


82


A from transducer


62


and to resistor


88


while node


94


B defines circuit output


86


A. Node


94


C connects resistor


90


and capacitor


92


in parallel to JFET


84


.




JFET amplifier circuit


81


advantageously provides both optimized impedance transformation, having an input impedance of 4 Mohm and an output impedance of merely 270 kohm, and optimal self-noise properties with some signal gain.




Another hearing assistance system


100


of the present invention is shown in FIG.


5


and can be used as a structural implementation of the embodiment shown in

FIGS. 3 and 4

. System


100


includes bimorph transducer


102


, substrate


104


, electrical connection lead wire


106


and preamplifier


108


. Bimorph transducer


102


includes elements


110


A and


110


B, each having electrically conductive contact surface


112


A and


112


B. Substrate


104


is an electrically conductive member including electrically conductive contact surfaces


114


and


116


and is mechanically connected to preamplifier


108


having electronic circuitry and supporting member


120


. Transducer


102


is electrically connected to preamplifier


108


in the following manner. Contact surface


112


A of transducer element


110


A is electrically connected to contact surface


116


of substrate


104


via electrical lead wire


106


. However, element


110


B of transducer


102


is electrically connected to substrate


104


via direct mechanical contact between contact surface


112


B and


114


.




Preamplifier


108


preferably has characteristics, features and attributes of the preamplifier


64


disclosed in

FIGS. 3 and 4

. However, other preamplifier configurations can be used. In addition, substrate


104


and supporting member


120


can be formed as part of or fastened to a mounting bracket, such as the bracket assembly shown later in FIG.


7


.




This configuration virtually eliminates lead wire length between preamplifier


108


and transducer


102


since electrically conductive substrate


104


provides a partially direct electrical and mechanical connection therebetween with the use of only very short lead wire


106


. This nearly complete direct electrical connection configuration greatly reduces the susceptibility of system


100


to electromagnetic interference and greatly reduces capacitance-based high-frequency audio signal attenuation.




Another hearing assistance system


130


of the present invention is shown in FIG.


6


and includes bimorph sensor transducer


132


(piezoelectric or electromagnetic), substrate


134


, electrically connecting lead wires


136


A and


136


B and preamplifier


138


. Sensor transducer


132


includes elements


140


A and


140


B and electrical contact surfaces


142


A and


142


B. Substrate


134


includes electrical contact surfaces


144


A and


144


B as well as mechanical connecting surface


146


. Preamplifier


138


includes supporting member


148


which is mechanically and electrically connected to substrate


134


.




The embodiment of

FIG. 6

permits a pair of electrically connecting lead wires


136


A and


136


B to electrically connect transducer


132


to preamplifier


138


via electrically conductive substrate


134


. While system


130


includes one additional lead wire more than the system shown in

FIG. 5

, the immediate, close physical proximity between preamplifier


138


and transducer


132


permits the use of extremely short electrical lead wires


136


A and


136


B which greatly diminishes the susceptibility of system


130


to electromagnetic interference and significantly reduces capacitance-based high-frequency audio signal attenuation. As shown in

FIG. 6

, bimorph transducer


132


includes a configuration in which elements


140


A and


140


B are staggered with element


140


A being shorter than element


140


B to permit exposure of electrical contact surfaces on the top surface of each of the respective elements


140


A and


140


B to permit electrical connection thereto.




In use, transducer


132


is placed in contact with an auditory element such as malleus


20


as shown in

FIG. 1

(or malleus


160


as shown in

FIG. 7

) for receiving mechanical sound vibrations therefrom wherein transducer


132


converts those sound vibrations into an electrical signal which is fed to preamplifier


138


via electrically connecting lead wires


136


A,


136


B and substrate


134


. System


130


can be placed in operative contact with a malleus or other auditory element of the ossicular chain using suitable mounting means, such as a mounting bracket similar to mounting bracket assembly


166


shown in FIG.


7


.




In another embodiment, hearing assistance system


150


of the present invention is shown in FIG.


7


. As shown, human auditory system


150


includes outer ear


154


and middle ear


156


. Pinna


157


forms outer ear


154


and joins with external auditory canal


158


. Middle ear


156


includes malleus


160


separated from incus (not shown). System


150


includes sensor transducer


162


, electronics/amplifier unit


164


, bracket assembly


166


, and connecting electrical lead wires


168


. Mounting bracket


166


is fastened to mastoid bone


170


to secure sensor


162


in contact with malleus


160


and to support amplifier


164


in close physical proximity to transducer


162


. Mounting electronics/amplifier unit


164


in close physical proximity to sensor transducer


162


permits a very short electrical connection


168


therebetween (or direct electrical connection with electrical contact elements between the amplifier


142


and transducer


146


).




In use, acoustic sound energy is received by sensor


162


via malleus


160


and converted to an electrical sound signal. The electrical sound signal is carried along electrical lead wire


168


to amplifier/electronics


164


for amplification and further signal processing steps prior to further transmission to driver transducer coupled to a stapes (not shown). Arranging high impedance amplifier/electronics


164


in close physical proximity to high impedance transducer


162


dramatically reduces susceptibility to electromagnetic interference.




Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention.



Claims
  • 1. An implantable hearing assistance system capable of maximizing high frequency audio performance and minimizing electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation, comprising:a high impedance sensor transducer; an impedance transformation device located at a minimal distance from and electrically connected to the sensor transducer, the minimal distance designed to eliminate the possibility of having a greater length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the impedance transformation device that is susceptible to electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation; a high impedance electronics unit electrically connected to the impedance transformation device; and a driver transducer electrically connected to the electronics unit.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the sensor transducer is a piezoelectric transducer.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the sensor transducer is an electromagnetic transducer.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the impedance transformation device is located at a maximum distance from the sensor transducer equal to ½ of the total distance between the sensor transducer and the electronics unit.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the sensor transducer and the electronics unit are electrically connected with at least one lead wire of a minimal length, the minimal length designed to eliminate the possibility of having a greater length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the impedance transformation device that is susceptible to electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation.
  • 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the minimal length of the lead wire is a maximum of {fraction (1/20)}th as long as the wavelength of the interfering signals impinging on the hearing assistance system.
  • 7. The system of claim 5, wherein the minimal length of the lead wire is a maximum of ¾ centimeter for a 2 GHz input signal.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, further comprising two lead wires electrically connecting the electronics unit to the impedance transformation device wherein the wires are adapted to provide a matched pair of differential input to the impedance transformation device.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, further including an electrically conductive substrate configured for electrically connecting the impedance transformation device to the sensor transducer.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the impedance transformation device is disposed adjacent to the sensor transducer.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the impedance transformation device is physically connected to the sensor transducer.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the impedance transformation device and the sensor transducer are housed as a single unit.
  • 13. The system of claim 1, further comprising a support member for supporting the sensor transducer and impedance transformation device.
  • 14. The system of claim 13, wherein the support member supports the impedance transformation device and at least an adjacent portion of the sensor transducer.
  • 15. The system of claim 13, wherein the support member further includes an electrically conductive substrate electrically connecting the sensor transducer to the impedance transformation device.
  • 16. The system of claim 1, wherein the impedance transformation device is a preamplifier.
  • 17. The system of claim 1, wherein the impedance transformation device includes a JFET amplifier circuit.
  • 18. An implantable hearing assistance system capable of maximizing high frequency audio performance and minimizing electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation, comprising:a high impedance sensor transducer; a high impedance electronics unit disposed at a minimal distance from and electrically connected to the sensor transducer, the minimal distance designed to eliminate the possibility of having a greater length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the high impedance electronics unit that is susceptible to electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation.
  • 19. The system of claim 18, further comprising a driver transducer electrically connected to the electronics unit.
  • 20. The system of claim 18, wherein the sensor transducer is a piezoelectric transducer.
  • 21. The system of claim 18, wherein the sensor transducer is an electromagnetic transducer.
  • 22. The system of claim 18, wherein the minimal distance is a maximum of {fraction (1/20)}th of the wavelength of interfering signals impinging upon the hearing assistance system.
  • 23. The system of claim 18, wherein the minimal distance is a maximum of ½ centimeter for a 2 GHz input signal.
  • 24. The system of claim 18, wherein the electronics unit is electrically connected directly to the sensor transducer through an electrically conductive substrate.
  • 25. The system of claim 18, wherein the electronics unit is mechanically connected to the sensor transducer through a bracket adapted to support both the electronics unit and the sensor transducer, the bracket also adapted to be mounted to an auditory element of the middle ear.
  • 26. The system of claim 18, wherein the electronics unit includes an amplifier.
  • 27. The system of claim 18, wherein the electronics unit and sensor transducer are housed as a single unit.
  • 28. The system of claim 18, further including a housing support for housing the electronics unit and at least an adjacent portion of the sensor transducer.
  • 29. The system of claim 18, further comprising a support member for supporting the sensor transducer and impedance transformation device.
  • 30. The system of claim 29, wherein the support member supports the impedance transformation device and at least an adjacent portion of the sensor transducer.
  • 31. The system of claim 29, wherein the support member further includes an electrically conductive substrate electrically connecting the sensor transducer to the impedance transformation device.
  • 32. An implantable hearing assistance system capable of maximizing high frequency audio performance and minimizing electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation, comprising:an electronics unit housing one or more electronic components; and a sensor transducer mechanically connected to the electronics unit and electrically connected to the electronic components by two or fewer lead wires having a minimal length and configured for eliminating the need to use a longer lead wire that is more susceptible to electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation.
  • 33. The system of claim 32, wherein the sensor transducer is a piezoelectric transducer.
  • 34. The system of claim 32, wherein the sensor transducer is an electromagnetic transducer.
  • 35. The system of claim 32, further comprising a driver transducer electrically connected to the electronics module.
  • 36. The system of claim 32, wherein one of the electronic components includes an amplifier.
  • 37. The system of claim 32, wherein the electronics unit is electrically connected directly to the sensor transducer through electrically conductive substrate.
  • 38. The system of claim 32, further including a mounting component adapted to mount the electronics unit and the sensor transducer at a minimal distance from each other, the minimal distance designed to eliminate the possibility of having a greater length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the electronics unit that is susceptible to electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation.
  • 39. The system of claim 38, wherein the mounting component comprises a bracket adapted to support the electronics unit and the sensor transducer and be mounted to an auditory element of the middle ear.
  • 40. The system of claim 32, wherein the electronics unit and sensor transducer are housed as a single unit.
  • 41. The system of claim 32, further comprising a support member for supporting the sensor transducer and the electronics unit.
  • 42. The system of claim 41, wherein the support member supports the electronics unit and at least an adjacent portion of the sensor transducer.
  • 43. The system of claim 41, wherein the support member further includes an electrically conductive substrate electrically connecting the sensor transducer to the electronics unit.
  • 44. A mounting support for an implantable hearing system device for mounting components of the hearing system at a minimal distance from each other, thereby minimizing electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation, the mounting support comprising:a bracket adapted to support a transducer and one or more auditory components of the implantable hearing assistance system directly adjacent from each other and be mounted to an auditory element of the middle ear.
  • 45. The mounting support of claim 44, wherein the one or more auditory components include an impedance transformation device.
  • 46. The mounting support of claim 44, wherein the one or more auditory components include an electronics unit.
  • 47. The mounting support of claim 44, wherein the transducer is separated from the one or more auditory components at a minimal distance, the minimal distance being a maximum of {fraction (1/20)}th as long as the wavelength of the interfering signals impinging on the hearing assistance system.
  • 48. The mounting support of claim 44, wherein the transducer is separated from the one or more auditory components at a minimal distance, the minimal distance being a maximum of ¾ centimeter for a 2 GHz input signal.
  • 49. A method of positioning an implantable hearing assistance system inside of an ear so as to maximize high frequency audio performance and minimize electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation, comprising the steps of:positioning a high impedance sensor transducer in contact with an auditory element of the middle ear; positioning an impedance transformation device at a minimal distance from the sensor transducer, the minimal distance designed to eliminate the possibility of having a greater length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the impedance transformation device that is susceptible to electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation providing a short length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the impedance transformation device.
  • 50. The method of claim 49, wherein the step of positioning an impedance transformation device at a minimal distance from the sensor transducer includes the step of physically connecting the impedance transformation device to the sensor transducer.
  • 51. The method of claim 49, wherein the step of positioning an impedance transformation device at a minimal distance from the sensor transducer is accomplished by housing the impedance transformation device and the sensor transducer in one unit.
  • 52. The method of claim 49 wherein the step of positioning an impedance transformation device at a minimal distance from the sensor transducer includes the step of positioning the impedance transformation device adjacent to the sensor transducer.
  • 53. The method of claim 49, wherein the step of positioning an impedance transformation device at a minimal distance from the sensor transducer includes the steps of mounting both the impedance transformation device and the sensor transducer on a single bracket assembly and mounting the bracket assembly to a bone.
  • 54. The method of claim 53, wherein the bone is the mastoid bone.
  • 55. The method of claim 49, wherein the minimal distance between the sensor transducer and the impedance transformation device is a maximum of {fraction (1/20)}th as long as a wavelength of an interfering signal impinging on the components of the hearing system.
  • 56. The method of claim 49, wherein the minimal distance between the sensor transducer and the impedance transformation device is a maximum of ¾ centimeter for a 2 GHz input signal.
  • 57. The method of claim 49, wherein the step of providing a short length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the impedance transformation device includes using two or fewer lead wires having a minimal length and configured for eliminating the need to use a longer lead wire that is more susceptible to electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation.
  • 58. The method of claim 49, wherein the step of providing a short length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the impedance transformation device is accomplished by connecting an electrically conductive substrate to electrically conductive surfaces of the sensor transducer and impedance transformation device.
  • 59. The method of claim 49, wherein the impedance transformation device is a preamplifier.
  • 60. The method of claim 49, further including the step of electrically connecting an electronics unit to the impedance transformation device.
  • 61. The method of claim 60, further including the step of electrically connecting a driver transducer to the electronics unit.
  • 62. A method of positioning an implantable hearing assistance system inside of an ear so as to maximize high frequency audio performance and minimize electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation, comprising the steps of:positioning a high impedance sensor transducer in contact with an auditory element of the middle ear; positioning a high impedance electronics unit at a minimal distance from the sensor transducer, the minimal distance designed to eliminate the possibility of having a greater length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the impedance transformation device that is susceptible to electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation; and providing a short length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the electronics unit.
  • 63. The method of claim 62, wherein the step of positioning an electronics unit at a minimal distance from the sensor transducer includes physically connecting the electronics unit to the sensor transducer.
  • 64. The method of claim 62, wherein the step of positioning an electronics unit at a minimal distance from the sensor transducer includes housing the electronics unit and the sensor transducer into one unit.
  • 65. The method of claim 62, wherein the step of positioning an electronics unit at a minimal distance from the sensor transducer includes positioning the electronics unit adjacent to the sensor transducer.
  • 66. The method of claim 62, wherein the step of positioning an electronics unit at a minimal distance from the sensor transducer includes mounting both the electronics unit and the sensor transducer on a single bracket assembly and mounting the bracket assembly to a bone.
  • 67. The method of claim 66, wherein the bone is the mastoid bone.
  • 68. The method of claim 62, wherein the minimal distance between the sensor transducer and the electronics unit is a maximum of {fraction (1/20)}th as long as a wavelength of an interfering signal impinging on the sensor transducer and other components of the hearing system.
  • 69. The method of claim 62, wherein the minimal distance between the sensor transducer and the electronics unit is a maximum of ¾ centimeter for a 2 GHz input signal.
  • 70. The method of claim 62, wherein the step of providing a short length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the electronics unit includes using two or fewer lead wires having a minimal length and configured for eliminating the need to use a longer lead wire that is more susceptible to electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation.
  • 71. The method of claim 62, wherein the step of providing a short length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the electronics unit includes connecting an electrically conductive substrate to electrically connect the sensor transducer to the electronics unit.
  • 72. The method of claim 62, wherein the electronics unit further includes an amplifier.
  • 73. The method of claim 62, further including the step of electrically connecting an driver transducer to the electronics unit.
  • 74. A method of positioning an implantable hearing assistance system inside of an ear so as to maximize high frequency audio performance and minimize electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation, comprising the steps of:mounting a high impedance sensor transducer on a bracket; mounting one or more components of the hearing system on the bracket at a minimal distance from the sensor transducer, the minimal distance designed to eliminate the possibility of having a greater length of electrical connection between the sensor transducer and the one or more components of the hearing system that is susceptible to electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation; mounting the bracket to an auditory element of the middle ear; and electrically connecting the sensor transducer to the one or more components of the hearing system so that the length in electrical connection is minimal.
  • 75. The method of claim 74, wherein the one or more components of the hearing system include an impedance transformation device.
  • 76. The method of claim 75, wherein the impedance transformation device is a preamplifier.
  • 77. The method of claim 74, wherein the one or more components of the hearing system include an electronics unit.
  • 78. The method of claim 77, wherein the electronics unit further includes an amplifier.
  • 79. The method of claim 74, wherein the minimal distance is a maximum of {fraction (1/20)}th as long as a wavelength of interfering signals impinging on the sensor transducer and other components of the hearing system.
  • 80. The method of claim 74, wherein the minimal distance is a maximum of ¾ centimeter for a 2 GHz input signal.
  • 81. The method of claim 74, wherein the step of electrically connecting the sensor transducer to one or more components of the hearing system includes using one or more lead wires having a minimal length and configured for eliminating the need to use a longer lead wire that is more susceptible to electromagnetic interference and high frequency audio attenuation.
  • 82. The method of claim 81, wherein the one or more minimal length lead wires has a maximum length of ¾ centimeter for a 2 GHz signal.
  • 83. The method of claim 81, wherein the one or more minimal length lead wires has a maximum length of {fraction (1/20)}th as long as a wavelength of an interfering signal impinging on the sensor transducer and other components of the hearing system.
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/159,915, filed on Sep. 29, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,264,825.

US Referenced Citations (76)
Number Name Date Kind
3346704 Mahoney Oct 1967 A
3557775 Mahoney Jan 1971 A
3594514 Wingrove Jul 1971 A
3712962 Epley Jan 1973 A
3764748 Branch et al. Oct 1973 A
3870832 Fredrickson Mar 1975 A
3882285 Nunley et al. May 1975 A
3940974 Taylor Mar 1976 A
3947647 Swinehart Mar 1976 A
3970862 Edelman et al. Jul 1976 A
4052754 Homsy Oct 1977 A
4063048 Kissiah, Jr. Dec 1977 A
4204135 Murayama May 1980 A
4207441 Ricard et al. Jun 1980 A
4284856 Hochmair et al. Aug 1981 A
4357497 Hochmair et al. Nov 1982 A
4369391 Micheron Jan 1983 A
4441210 Hochmair et al. Apr 1984 A
4520236 Gauthier May 1985 A
4601723 McGrew Jul 1986 A
4606329 Hough Aug 1986 A
4628907 Epley Dec 1986 A
4696287 Hartmann et al. Sep 1987 A
4729366 Schaefer Mar 1988 A
4774933 Hough et al. Oct 1988 A
4776322 Hough et al. Oct 1988 A
4800884 Heide et al. Jan 1989 A
4817607 Tatge Apr 1989 A
4850962 Schaefer Jul 1989 A
4918745 Hutchison Apr 1990 A
4957478 Maniglia Sep 1990 A
4988333 Engebretson et al. Jan 1991 A
5012520 Steeger Apr 1991 A
5015224 Maniglia May 1991 A
5015225 Hough et al. May 1991 A
5030198 Anderson Jul 1991 A
5061282 Jacobs Oct 1991 A
5083312 Newton et al. Jan 1992 A
5084699 DeMichele Jan 1992 A
5085628 Engebretson et al. Feb 1992 A
5259033 Goodings et al. Nov 1993 A
5277694 Leyaieffer et al. Jan 1994 A
5279292 Baumann et al. Jan 1994 A
5282858 Bisch et al. Feb 1994 A
5318502 Gilman Jun 1994 A
5344422 Frigg Sep 1994 A
5411467 Hortman et al. May 1995 A
5456654 Ball Oct 1995 A
5498226 Lenkauskas Mar 1996 A
5531787 Lesinski et al. Jul 1996 A
5554096 Ball Sep 1996 A
5558618 Maniglia Sep 1996 A
5624376 Ball et al. Apr 1997 A
5707338 Adams et al. Jan 1998 A
5762583 Adams et al. Jun 1998 A
5788711 Lehner et al. Aug 1998 A
5800366 Ball et al. Sep 1998 A
5879283 Adams et al. Mar 1999 A
5897283 Lenguyen Apr 1999 A
5897486 Ball et al. Apr 1999 A
5899847 Adams et al. May 1999 A
5913815 Ball et al. Jun 1999 A
5935166 Kennedy Aug 1999 A
5954628 Kennedy Sep 1999 A
5960093 Miller Sep 1999 A
5993376 Kennedy Nov 1999 A
5997466 Adams et al. Dec 1999 A
6005955 Kroll Dec 1999 A
6041131 Kirchhoefer et al. Mar 2000 A
6093144 Jaeger et al. Jul 2000 A
6113531 Leysieffer Sep 2000 A
6140740 Porat et al. Oct 2000 A
6162169 Leysieffer Dec 2000 A
6190305 Ball et al. Feb 2001 B1
6190306 Kennedy Feb 2001 B1
6208743 Marten et al. Mar 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
P2 203 1949 Jul 1994 DE
196 18 961 Nov 1997 DE
196 38 158 Apr 1998 DE
196 38 159 Apr 1998 DE
0 263 254 Apr 1998 EP
WO 9806235 Feb 1998 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (62)
Entry
US 5,730,699, 3/1998, Adams et al. (withdrawn)
Berlincourt, D., “Piezoelectric Ceramics: Characteristics and Applications,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70(6): 1586-1595, (1981).
Cook, R.O., et al., “Comparison of Acoustically Coupled and Mechanically Coupled Speech,” Audiology, 20: 516-529 (1981).
Dumon, M.D., T. et al., “Piezoelectric Middle Ear Implant Preserving the Ossicular Chain,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 28:173-188, (1995).
Gyo, K., et al., “Sound Pickup Utilizing an Implantable Piezoelectric Ceramic Bimorph Element: Application to the Cochlear Implant,” American Journal of Otology, 5:273-276, (1984).
Hough, M.D., J., et al., “Middle Ear Implantable Hearing Device: Ongoing Animal and Human Evaluation,” Ann. Otol. Rhinol Laryngol, 97:650-658, (1988).
Kartush, M.D., J.M., “Electromagnetic Ossicular Augmentation Device,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 28:155-172, (1995).
Gyo, K., et al., “Stapes Vibration Produced by the Output Transducer of an Implantable Hearing Aid,” Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 113:1078-1081, (1987).
Gyo, K., et al., “Measurement of Stapes Vibration Driven by the Ceramic Vibrator of a Middle Ear Impalnt—Human Temporal Bone Experiments,” Advances in Audiology (Karger, Basil), 4:107-116, (1988).
Kodera, K., et al., “Evaluation of the Ceramic Vibrator in the Cat,” Advances in Audiology (Karger, Basel), 4:97-106, (1988).
Ko, PhD., W., “Engineering Principles of Mechanical Stimulation of the Middle Ear,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 28:19-41 (1995).
Maniglia, M.D., A.J., et al., Contactless Semi-Implantable Electromagnetic Middle Ear Device for the Treatment of Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Short-Term and Long_Term Animal Experiments,: Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 28: 121-140, (1995).
Maniglia, M.D., A.J., “Implantable Hearing Devices: State of the Art,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 28:175-200, (1989).
Ohno, T., et al., “Structure and Performance of the Main Components,” Advances in Audiology (Karger, Basel), 4:52-72, (1988).
Ohno, T., “The Implantable Hearing Aid,” Audecibel, Fall 1984, Winter 1985, (1984).
Stach, PhD., B.A., et al., “Hearing Aids: I. Conventional Hearing Devices,” Archives of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 122:227-231, (1996).
Suzuki, M.D., J.I., et al., “Partially Implantable Piezoelectric Middle Ear Hearing Device: Long-Term Results,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 28:99-106, (1995).
Suzuki, M.D., J.I., “Principle, Copnstruction and Indication of the Middle Ear Implant,” Advances in Audiology, 4:15-21, (1988).
Suzuki, J.I., et al., “Middle Ear Implant-Implantable Hearing Aid,” Advances in Audiology (Karger) 77-80, (Nov. 1983).
Wilpizeski, PhD., C., et al., “A Simple Implantable Elecgtromechanical Middle Ear,” Transactions of the Pennsylvania Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, 32:41-46, (1979).
Yanagihara, M.D., N., et al., “Partially Implantable Hearing Aid Using Piezoelectric Ceramic Ossicular Vibrator,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 28:85-98, (1995).
Yanagihara, N., et al., “Efficacy of the Partially Implantable Middle Ear Implant in Middle and Inner Ear Disorders,” Advances in Audioilogy, 4:149-159, (1988).
Riggs, M. T., “Powered Incus Replacement Prosthesis (SBIR Grant Application),,” Letter, (1983).
Maniglia, M.D., A.J., “A Contactless Electromagnetic Implantable Middle Ear Device for Sensorineural Hearing Loss,” Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, 73(2), (1994).
Hough, M.D., J., “A Middle Ear Implantable Hearing Device for Controlled Amplification of Sound in the Human: A Preliminary Report,” Laryngoscope, 97:141-151, (1987).
Lenkauskas, E., “Totally Implantable Hearing Aid Device,” Transplants and Implants in Otology II, 371-375, (1991).
Borg, E., et al., The Middle-Ear Muscles:, Scientific American (Aug. 1989).
Dormer, PhD., K.J., et al., “Selection of Biomaterials for Middle and Inner Ear Implants”, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 28:17-28, (1995).
Glorig, A., et al, Magnetically Coupled Stimulation of the Ossicular Chain: Measures in Kangaroo Rat and Man:, Journal if the Acoustical Society of America, 52: 694-696, (1972).
Goode, M.D., R.L., “Current Status of Electromagnetic Implantable Hearing Aids”, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 28:201-209, (1989).
Goode, M.D.., R.L., “Electromagnetic Implantable Hearing Aids”, Advances in Audiology (Karger, Basel), 4:22-31, (1988).
Goode, M.D., R.L., “Implantable Hearing Aids”, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 11:155-161, (1978).
Goode, M.D., R.L., et al., “Audition Via Electromagnetic Induction”, Archives of Otolaryngology, 98:23-26. (1973).
Goode, M.D., R.L., “An Implantable Hearing Aid”, Tr. Am. Academy of Ophth, and Otol., 74:128-139, (1970).
Gyo, K., et al. Measurement of the Ossicular Vibration Ratio in Human Temporal Bones by Use of A video Measuring System:, Acta Otolaryngol, 103:87-95, (1987).
Gyo, K, et al., “Effect of Middle Ear Modification on Umbo Vibration”:, Archives of Otolaryngology Heard and Neck Surgery, 112:1262-1268, (1986).
Kodera, M.D., K., et al, “Sound Evaluation of Partially Implantable Piezoelectric Middle Ear Implant: Comparative Study of Frequency Responses”, Ear, Nosed and Throat Journal, 73:108-111, (1994).
Maniglia, M.D, A.J., et al., “Electromagnetic Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Device of the Ossicular-Stimulating Type: Principles, Designs, and Experiments”, Ann. Otol. Rhinol Larygol, 97 (suppl 136), part 2, (1988).
Ohno, T., et al., “Performance of the Middle Ear Implants,” Advances in Audiology (Karger, Basel), 4:85-96 (1988).
Spindel, PhD., J.H. et al., “The Round Window Electromagnetic Implantable Hearing Aid Approach”, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 28: 189-206, (1995),
Suzuki, M.D., J.I., et al., “Further Clinical Experiences with Middle-Ear Implantable Hearing Aids: Indications and Sound Quality Evaluation”, ORL, 51:229-234, (1989).
Suzuki, J.I., et al, “Implantation of Partially Implantable Middle Ear Implant and the Indication”, Advances in Audiology (Karger, Basel), 4:160-166, (1988).
Suzuki, J.I. et al., “Early Studies and the History of Development of the Middle Ear Implant in Japan”, Advances in Audiology (Karger, Basel), 4:1-14, (1988).
Suzuki, J. et al., Middle Ear Implant for Humans, Acta Otolaryngol, 99:313-317, (1985).
Velmans, PhD., M.L., “New Ears for Old: Auditory Implants and Frequency Transposing Hearing Aids”, Journal of Royal College Physicians, London, 16:83-88, (1982).
Yanagihara, N. et al., “Intraoperative Assessment of Vibrator-Induced Hearing”, Advances in Audiology, 4:124-133, (1988).
Yanagihara, N. et al., “Implantable Hearing Aid”, Archives of Otolaryngology Heard and Neck Surgery, 113: 869-872, (1987).
Yanagihara, M.D. et al, “Development of an Implantable Hearing Aid Using a Piezoelectric Vibrator of Bimorph Design: State of the Art”, Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 92:706-712, (1984).
Yanagihara, M.D., N. et al., Perception of Sound Through Direct Oscillation of the Stapes Using a Piezoelectric Ceramic Bimorph, Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol, 92:223-227, (1983).
Spindel, PhD., J.H., “Current Status of Implantable Hearing Aids”, University of Virginia, journal unknown, (1995).
Gyo, M.D., K., et al., “Present Status and Outlook of the Implantable Hearing Aid”, American Journal of Otology, 11:250-253, (1990).
Goode, M.D., R.L., “Current Status and Future of Implantable Electromagnetic Hearing Aids”, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 28:141-146, (1995).
Goode, R.L., “Implantable Hearing Devices”, Medical Clinics of North America, 75:1261-1266, (1991).
Maniglia, A.J. et al., “Design, Development, and Analysis of a Newer Electromagnetic Semi-Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Device”, Transplants and Implants in Otology II, 371-375, (1991).
Maniglia, A.J et al., “Contactless, Semi-Implantable Electromagnetic Hearing Device for the Treatment of Sensorineural Hearing Loss”, Abstract of Paper Presented at International Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids. Walt Disney World Swan, Abstract #29, (Nov. 11-14, 1993).
Suzuki, J.I. et al., “Long-Term Clinical Results of the Partially Implantable Piezoelectric Middle Ear Implatn”, Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, 73(2): 104-107. (Feb. 1994).
Tos, M. et al., “Implantation of Electromagnetic Ossicular Replacement Device”, Ear, Nose and Throat Journal, 73(2): 93-103, (Feb. 1994).
Yanagihara, M.D., N. et al., “Partially Implantable Hearing Aid Using Piezoelecric Ceramic Ossicular Vibrator”, Abstract of Paper Presented at International Symposium on Electronic Implants in Otology and Conventional Hearing Aids. Walt Disney World Swan, Abstract #26, (Nov. 11-14, 1993).
Bento, M.D., R. et al., “A Pathway for Information Transmission to the Ear”, ENT-Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, 74(9): 640-644, (Sep. 1995).
Hunyadi, Jr., S., et al., “Effect of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on a New Electromagnetic Implantable Middle Ear Hearing Device”, The American Journal of Otology, vol. 18, No. 3 (1997).
Maniglia, MD, A. et al., “A Contactless Electromagnetic Implantable Middle Ear Device for Sensorineural Hearing Loss”, ENT Journal, vol. 73, No. 2 (Feb. 1994).
St. Croix Medical, “Envoy Electronic-Piezokinetic Ossicular Replacement Prostheses (E-PORP) System”, stcroixmedical.com/prod01.htm (1998).
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/159915 Sep 1998 US
Child 10/015735 US