Various embodiments concern technologies for acquiring information indicating the dispensing of medication or other substances. More particularly, various embodiments relate to technologies for determining whether medication is being dispensed, prepared for use, etc., through indirectly detecting pressure, contact, etc., applied to the container.
A substantial portion of medications are not taken as prescribed. By some estimates, in clinical practice up to 50% or more of medications either may not be taken at all or may be taken with significant deviations from what is prescribed for the patient. For example, doses of a medication may be skipped, the medication may not be taken at the right intervals, at the right times, in the right dose, applied in the correct manner, etc. Such deviation from a prescribed medication regimen may be referred to broadly as “nonadherence.” Nonadherence to prescribed medication regimens may have dramatic negative effects on health and/or healthcare costs, whether considering individuals or societies collectively.
Nonadherence may be even more common in clinical research, wherein some estimates indicate nonadherence of up to 70% or more. Nonadherence in a research context also presents other potential concerns. For example, testing of new medications typically may include efforts to determine the effectiveness of the medication, what side effects occur, how severe those side effects may be, in what fraction of the population those side effects occur, etc. Thus, nonadherence in a research setting may distort the basic understanding of a medication, e.g., if a medication is in fact highly effective if taken as prescribed but ineffective or dangerous if not taken properly, poor adherence within a clinical trial may result in data showing that the medication is not effective (when the actual problem is that it was not taken correctly).
One matter complicating issues related to nonadherence is that reliable data on the existence, degree, and form(s) of nonadherence present may be difficult to acquire. Whether for an individual, a larger population, or even a carefully selected and/or monitored group such as the subjects in a clinical trial, authentic data on how much nonadherence is taking place, among whom, and in what forms (e.g., missing doses, taking the medication incorrectly, etc.) may not be available through conventional sources. Without such authenticated data it may not even be known how much nonadherence is taking place (beyond estimates), much less what the specific impacts of nonadherence may be in a given case.
At least in principle, it may be possible to detect, record, and/or report the use of a medication through making medication containers “smart,” in such way that the containers themselves may detect that medication has been dispensed and/or used. For example, sensors may be disposed on or incorporated into a container. However, such an approach also presents challenges, such as potential fragility of such sensors or the possibility that events other than dispensing medication may result in spurious data being generated by the sensors. For example, medication containers that are handled and/or carried regularly may be subject to various environmental hazards, e.g., the container may be dropped, sat upon (for example if kept in a pocket), bumped or scraped by other objects in a pocket or bag, etc., possibly resulting in damage. Similarly, sensors may be triggered by similar conditions, for example a force sensor on a container kept in a pocket may record forces applied to the container by other objects in the pocket, etc., possibly causing data to be generated that may incorrectly suggest that someone squeezed the container in order to dispense medication.
Also, medication containers frequently may be disposable. For example, a container may hold a 30-day supply of medication, a single dose, etc., with the expectation that a user may dispose of the container when the medication has been consumed (or has expired, etc.). If such a medication container includes sensors that are in and/or on the container, then the sensors (and/or other electronics or elements) may be disposed of with the containers. This may present issues with regard to manufacturing a smart container at a suitable cost as to be disposable, and/or dealing with the presence of sensors etc. within recycling or waste streams. On the other hand, while reusing a medication container may be possible in principle to avoid such cost/disposal concerns, reuse may itself raise issues with regard to sterility and safety, regulatory approval, and so forth.
This disclosure contemplates a variety of systems, apparatus, methods, and paradigms for determining indirectly whether medication has been dispensed from a container.
In one embodiment an apparatus is provided that includes a structural body (or simply “a body”), the body defining a container cavity adapted to accommodate a medication container so as to move with the body, a force aperture adapted to pass dispensing force to the container and to receive the medication container into the container cavity in an inward lateral motion, and a dispensing aperture adapted to enable the neck of the medication container to extend therethrough to enable the container to dispense medication. The body includes flexible arms adapted to releasably restrain the container within the container cavity, a back obstacle adapted to obstruct outward lateral motion of the container from the container cavity other than via the force aperture, an upper obstacle adapted to obstruct an upward vertical motion of the container from the container cavity (the dispensing aperture being defined therein), and a lower obstacle adapted to obstruct a downward vertical motion of the container from the container cavity.
The apparatus includes a spine engaged with the body, the spine defining a spine component cavity therein such that when the spine is engaged with the body the container cavity is between the force aperture and the spine component cavity, and a foot engaged with the body, the foot defining a foot component cavity. The apparatus also includes a proximity sensor disposed within the spine component cavity and adapted to generate proximity data in response to a proximity of a finger thereto from outside the body, a disposition sensor disposed within the foot component cavity and adapted to generate disposition data including position data, translation data, orientation data, and/or rotation data in response to the disposition of the body, and a force sensor disposed within the spine component cavity and adapted to generate force data in response to a transmitted force applied thereto from the medication container.
The apparatus further includes a processor disposed within the body and in communication with the force sensor, the proximity sensor, and the disposition sensor, a data store in communication with the processor, an outputter in communication with the processor, and a communicator in communication with the processor. The processor is adapted to determine whether the proximity data from the proximity sensor corresponds with a dispensing proximity of the finger to the proximity sensor associated with dispensing the medication from the container, and in response to the proximity data corresponding with the dispensing proximity, activate the disposition sensor and the force sensor. The processor is also adapted to determine whether the disposition data from the disposition sensor corresponds with a dispensing disposition of the body with the container therein associated with dispensing the medication from the container, and determine whether the force data from the force sensor corresponds with a dispensing force being applied to the medication container and the transmitted force being applied to the force sensor by the medication container in response to the dispensing force. The processor is further adapted to register a medication event in response to the disposition data corresponding with the dispensing disposition and the force data corresponding with the dispensing force.
The body, the force aperture, and the force sensor are configured such that the transmitted force is generated in response to the dispensing force being applied to the medication container through the force aperture, and such that the transmitted force is not generated in response to the dispensing force being applied to the medication container other than through the force aperture.
Registering the medication event includes storing the medication event and a medication event time thereof in the data store, outputting the medication event and the medication event time via the outputter, and communicating the medication event and the medication event time to an external entity via the communicator.
In another embodiment an apparatus is provided that includes a body, the body defining a container cavity adapted to accommodate a medication container such that the medication container moves with the body, and a force aperture adapted to pass a dispensing force to the container, the force aperture further being adapted to receive the medication container into the container cavity. The body includes a restraint adapted to releasably restrain the medication container in the container cavity, a force sensor adapted to generate force data in response to a transmitted force applied thereto from the medication container, and a processor in communication with the force sensor. The processor is adapted to determine whether the force data from the force sensor corresponds with dispensing a medication from the medication container, and in response to the force data corresponding with dispensing the medication, register a medication event. The body, the force aperture, and the force sensor are configured such that the transmitted force is generated in response to the dispensing force being applied to the medication container through the force aperture, and such that the transmitted force is not generated in response to the dispensing force being applied to the medication container other than through the force aperture. Registering the medication event includes storing the medication event and a medication event time thereof, outputting the medication event and the medication event time, and communicating the medication event and the medication event time to an external entity.
The restraints may include a flexible arm adapted to releasably restrain the container within the container cavity via mechanical interference therewith, an adhesive strip adapted to restrain the container within the container cavity via adhesion thereto, a two-part hook-and-loop band adapted to restrain the container within the container cavity via hook-and-loop engagement of the band around the container, an elastic band adapted to restrain the container within the container cavity via the elastic band being disposed around the container, a tie cord adapted to restrain the container within the container cavity via the tie cord being tied around the container, and a magnet adapted to restrain the container within the container cavity via magnetic engagement between the magnet and the container.
The body may include a shell forming at least half of a circumference of a cylinder, the container cavity being defined as a concavity of the cylinder adapted to receive the container therein. The body may include a shell forming not more than half of a circumference of a cylinder, the container cavity being defined as a concavity of the cylinder adapted to receive the container therein.
The force aperture may be adapted to accept the container therethrough into the container cavity. The apparatus may define an insertion aperture distinct from the force aperture and adapted to accept the container therethrough into the container cavity. The force aperture may include a flexible membrane adapted to transmit the dispensing force therethrough to the container.
The apparatus may include a second sensor adapted to generate second sensor data. The second sensor may include a proximity sensor, a disposition sensor, a temperature sensor, a light sensor, an imager, a humidity sensor, an ultraviolet sensor, and/or an acoustic sensor. The second sensor may include a proximity sensor adapted to generate proximity data in response to an object proximity to the proximity sensor, and wherein the processor is adapted to determine whether the proximity data from the proximity sensor corresponds with a user handling the medication container, and in response to the proximity data corresponding with the user handling the medication container, activate the force sensor.
The apparatus may include a disposition sensor adapted to generate disposition data for the medication container. The processor may be adapted to activate the disposition sensor in response to the proximity data corresponding with the user handling the medication container, determine whether the force data from the force sensor and the disposition data from the disposition sensor in cooperation correspond with dispensing a medication from the medication container, and in response to the force data and the disposition data corresponding with dispensing the medication, register a medication event.
The apparatus may include a spine, the spine defining a spine cavity. The force sensor may be disposed in the spine cavity, and in communication with the container cavity. The apparatus may include a foot, the foot defining a foot cavity. The processor may be disposed in the foot cavity. The apparatus may include a shoe adapted to removably engage with the body, the shoe defining a shoe cavity.
The processor and the force sensor are removably engaged with the body. Some or all electronic components may be removably engaged with the body. Some or all non-mechanical components may be removably engaged with the body.
The body may be a label engaged with the container.
In another embodiment a method is provided that includes obstructing a dispensing force to a medication container from a first aspect, and passing a dispensing force to the medication container from a second aspect. The method includes generating force data from a transmitted force applied by the medication container in response to the dispensing force applied to the medication container, determining whether the force data corresponds with dispensing a medication from the medication container, and in response to the force data corresponding with dispensing the medication from the medication container, registering a medication event.
In another embodiment an apparatus is provided that includes means for obstructing a dispensing force to a medication container from a first aspect and means for passing a dispensing force to the medication container from a second aspect. The apparatus also includes means for generating force data from a transmitted force applied by the medication container in response to the dispensing force applied to the medication container, means for determining whether the force data corresponds with dispensing a medication from the medication container, and means for registering a medication event in response to the force data corresponding with dispensing the medication from the medication container.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
Various objects, features, and characteristics will become more apparent to those skilled in the art from a study of the following Detailed Description in conjunction with the appended claims and drawings, all of which form a part of this specification. While the accompanying drawings include illustrations of various embodiments, the drawings are not intended to limit the claimed subject matter.
The figures depict various embodiments described throughout the Detailed Description for the purposes of illustration only. While specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are described in detail below, the technology is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms. The intention is not to limit the technology to the particular embodiments described. Accordingly, the claimed subject matter is intended to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the technology as defined by the appended claims.
Various embodiments are described herein that relate to indirectly determining the dispensing of medication from a container.
As an initial and non-limiting summary, the dispensing of medication from a container may be determined indirectly by detecting forces transmitted by the container when a user applies forces to that container, in order to dispense the medication. For example, medication may be dispensed from a squeeze bottle by applying a force to the side of the bottle (e.g., pressure with a finger). If a force sensor is disposed on the far side of the bottle from where force is applied, then the bottle may in turn press against that force sensor. The transmitted force—applied to the sensor by the container as force is applied to the container (e.g. by a user)—may be understood in at least some sense as being an “indirect force”. Thus, considering such indirect forces to determine whether medication has been dispensed similarly may be understood as “indirect sensing”.
By way of illustration,
Now with reference to
However, it is noted that while
For example, as shown in
At least in principle it may be possible to arrange numerous force sensors so that any force as may be applied to dispense medication also may be detected by one such force sensor. However, in practice, such duplication of sensors may contribute to increased weight, cost, complexity power consumption, processor requirements (e.g., to monitor multiple sensors and evaluate multiple data streams therefrom), and so forth.
Turning to
Also, in
However, as may be seen inward force 0566A is not obstructed by the body 0552. Consequently, inward force 0566A may be sufficient to serve as a dispensing force and dispense medication from the container 0552. (It is noted that even though inward forces 0566A and 0566E may be applied together, e.g., by the thumb and finger of a user's hand, it is possible for one such force 0566E to be obstructed by the body 0504 while the other force 0566A is not obstructed.) In addition, the inward force 0566A applied to the container 0552 causes the container in turn to apply an outward force 0568 against the body 0504 and in particular against the force sensor 0540. That is, pushing against the container 0552 causes the container to push against the body 0504 and sensor 0540. The outward force 0568 may be detected by the force sensor 0540, and the force sensor 0540 may generate force data therefrom.
With regard to terminology, it is noted that although the terms “inward force” and “outward force” may be used with regard to
Furthermore, it may be useful to distinguish dispensing forces as distinct from applied forces more generally. Not all forces as may be applied to a container necessarily may be capable of dispensing medication or intended to dispense medication. Pressing the nozzle downward into a squeeze bottle at least arguably may be considered an applied force, but may not serve to dispense medication. Similarly, with a body 0504 in place as shown in
Moving on to
Typically, to facilitate a reliable determination that medication has been dispensed based on applied forces it may be preferable that all applied forces that result in medication being dispensed may be detected, and also that any applied forces that cannot result in medication being dispensed are in some manner excluded. In logical terms, in an ideal situation positive events should be detectable but false positives should not be detected.
Considering the arrangement in
Still with reference to
In sum with regard to
In addition, several features of the arrangement in
The arrangement in
Also, in the arrangement of
Turning now to
The apparatus includes a force sensor 0740 disposed within the body 0704.
Several “negative space” elements also are shown in
The body 0704 as shown in
Turning to
It is emphasized that the arrangement and operation of the restraints 0814 as shown in
Now with reference to
In
Turning to
With reference to
In
Now with reference to
Turning to
Now with reference to
However, as may be seen in
Turning to
Though not shown in
Thus, as shown of
At this point it may be illuminating to describe certain advantages as may attach to various embodiments, in view of structure illustrated and described herein.
For example, in in configuring a body with a force sensor in a “half-shell” arrangement such as is shown in
Similarly, given such a half-shell arrangement the force sensor may be protected against certain forms of damage, such as rough handling. The medication container itself, in acting as an intermediary in transferring forces to the force sensor, may also be viewed as a sort of “shock absorber” protecting the force sensor. Force sensors may be prone to such damage by nature; attempting to make a force sensor insensitive to applied forces may be self-defeating, resulting in a sensor that cannot detect such forces. However, positioning a force sensor in such manner that certain incidental forces are restricted from reaching that sensor may be fruitful, without necessarily limiting the sensitivity of the sensor itself.
Further, such a half-shell configuration may (as already noted) restrict the direction(s) from which dispensing force may be applied to a medication container therein. Pressure applied from any direction except via the container insertion aperture (e.g., “the open side” of the body) may be blocked in part or in full by the body. If such forces are so blocked from reaching the container, then the container may not dispense medication in response. Consequently, only dispensing forces aligned with the container insertion aperture may result in medication being dispensed; given suitable placement of the force sensor, it may be arranged that all (or at least most) dispensing forces that can in fact dispense medication likewise are aligned with the force sensor, and are detectable thereby. Such an approach may avoid certain issues noted with regard to
Configuring a system so that all useful dispensing forces may be detected by a single sensor may provide certain benefits in itself. For example, use of multiple sensors typically may increase cost, weight, power draw, etc., and/or may present a greater “footprint” in terms of materials that are needed to manufacture a device and that must be accommodated when disposing of or recycling a device.
In addition, a half-shell configuration may facilitate visual and/or tactile guidance to a user as to where to apply dispensing forces. Rather than attempting (for example) to mark a container so as to indicate where to squeeze (e.g., so that a given sensor may detect the squeeze), leaving a gap such as the container insertion aperture through which the user may contact the container may provide sensory clues to the user. Configuring a half-shell structure may guide the user to naturally squeeze the medication container through the gap, possibly without the user having to consider the matter (and potentially without the user even being aware of being guided).
Furthermore, by leaving a gap a visual line of sight to the medication container may be maintained. Thus, labels identifying the medication, providing instructions for use, indicating use-by dates, etc. may remain visible even while the container is secured within the body and ready for use. In more colloquial terms, the medication is not being “covered up”; a user can see the container, the label, etc., and thus may distinguish one medication from another even while the medication containers are in respective bodies. In certain jurisdictions such visibility may even be legally required for at least some medications, or at least may be medically recommended. Likewise, optical scanners (e.g., reading bar codes, Quick Response (QR) codes, etc.) and/or other sensors such as radio-frequency identification (RFID) readers may be able to read containers/labels through the container insertion aperture even if the body proper is partly or entirely opaque to such sensors.
In addition, a half-shell arrangement adapted for lateral insertion of a container (as shown in certain examples herein) may have additional advantages with regard to accommodating a variety of containers. Containers may vary greatly in form, in part due to the needs of the medication, the intended manner for dispensing the medication, etc. A lateral-insertion half-shell configuration may be readily adapted for a wide variety of containers, where longitudinal insertion may not accommodate containers that are wider at the bottom or in the middle than at the top.
It is noted that at least certain embodiments of a half-shell body may be produced as integral objects, e.g., with no physical mechanisms such as push buttons, springs, latches, etc. Even for arrangements wherein a body may include two or more parts, such as a removable shoe, the body and/or the shoe may themselves be integral and without moving parts (e.g., using a friction fit, threads, etc. to engage). At least certain forms of restraints, such as those shown for example in
In addition, while the term “half-shell” may be used descriptively with regard to certain embodiments herein, it should not be understood as literal. For example, a given body is not required to cover half or even approximately half of a container or a circumference thereof; one-quarter or three-quarter coverage may be suitable for some embodiments, and coverage of a container is not limited. Nor is a body required to be or include a literal shell (e.g., thin, uniform, in direct contact with the container, etc.). Furthermore, while certain examples herein may show a half-shell configuration that accepts containers therein laterally and restricts vertical movement of containers therein, this too is an example and is not required for all embodiments.
Now with reference to
In the arrangement of
The manner by which force is obstructed 1914 from the first aspect is not limited. A body such as illustrated and described in certain previous examples herein may be suitable, but other arrangements also may be suitable. In addition, it is noted that force need not be fully prevented from reaching the container from the first aspect. For example, if sufficiently great force were applied to a body, presumably the body may deform or break; it is not required that a body be indestructible, impenetrable, etc. Rather, it may be sufficient merely to attenuate applied forces, or to block applied forces up to some maximum level, so that for example medication is not dispensed from the container in response to dispensing forces of typical magnitude from the first aspect. In such case, routine handling, storage, or even typical “squeezes” applied to (for example) an eye drop bottle from the first aspect would not cause medication to be dispensed, even if it were in theory possible to break or otherwise overwhelm the body with enough force.
It is noted that in referring to obstructing 1914 a dispensing force from the first aspect, it may not be required for a dispensing force to in fact be applied from the first aspect. That is, it may be sufficient that the effect of obstructing such forces is made manifest, for example, a container is engaged within a rigid body that would block a dispensing force from the first aspect if such a dispensing force were applied. Even if no actual dispensing force were ever applied to the container from the first aspect, it still may be reasonable to consider that such forces are blocked by the rigid body. While in a very strict sense it may be that what is being obstructed is a potential for dispensing forces to be applied, for clarity it is referred to herein that such forces are being obstructed. (Similarly, if motion of a container out of a container cavity is referred to herein as being obstructed, it should be understood that providing some means for carrying out that obstruction may be sufficient, whether or not any physical attempt ever is made to remove the container as obstructed.)
Moving on in
Again, the manner by which dispensing forces are passed along the second aspect is not limited. An opening such as a force aperture in a body may be suitable, but other arrangements also may be suitable. Likewise, dispensing forces applied along the second aspect need not be fully passed. For example, rather than being fully open (e.g., being literally an opening) a force aperture may be covered in part or in whole by flexible material, such as a layer of cloth or plastic film, etc. In such case the cloth or film may attenuate forces applied to the container, but forces still are passed sufficiently therethrough that medication may be dispensed from the medication container by applying a dispensing force from the second aspect. Such a “covered aperture” arrangement may still be considered to be (and may function as) a force aperture; even such a force aperture “isn't really a hole” in a colloquial sense, a flexible membrane may still pass forces to the container and thus still may be understood as being an aperture for forces (even if not being an aperture for the passage of physical matter therethrough; it may be that a covered force aperture may not be suitable to also serve as an insertion aperture).
Still with reference to
A determination is made 1948 as to whether the force data corresponds with dispensing medication. For example, considering an eye drop bottle as an example the force applied thereto to dispense medication may exhibit certain ranges of magnitude, duration, rise and fall rates, overall curve shapes, etc. Such parameters may be sufficiently characteristic as to distinguish dispensing medication from dropping the container, an object bumping or pressing against the container in a pocket or bag, etc. In turn, the forces applied by the container in response to dispensing forces being applied thereto also may exhibit parameters that are sufficiently characteristic as to distinguish medication being dispensed from other events taking place. Consequently, the force data (which reflects the forces applied by the container) may likewise include sufficient information as to determine with at least some degree of confidence whether medication has been dispensed or not. For example, some standard for force data may be established, such as minimum and/or maximum force levels, curve shapes for plots of force over time, etc., and a comparison made between the force data and the force data standard. However, other arrangements also may be suitable.
As a particular example regarding force data, consider a distinction between dispensing medication from an eye drop bottle, squeezing the bottle with the cap off but with the bottle vertical so that only air is expelled therefrom, and squeezing the bottle with the cap in place. In dispensing medication, some resistance may be present when squeezing the bottle; liquid must be expelled, thus sufficient force must be applied to the container to overcome the stiffness of the container walls and the viscosity of the liquid medication, etc. In expelling only air, less resistance may be present (air being less viscous than certain liquids), and thus the overall force transmitted by the container, the rates of increase and decrease, etc. may be different Likewise, in expelling nothing (leaving the cap in place), the transmitted force again may be different, since the volume of the container may not be changing and nothing may be flowing from the nozzle thereof. Consequently, it may be possible to distinguish from the force data whether medication is in fact dispensed, or only air is expelled, or if the cap is left in place and nothing is expelled from the container. Thus, errors (e.g., forgetting to take the cap off) or deliberate deception (e.g., squeezing the bottle to mimic dispensing medication without actually dispensing any) may be identified based on evaluation of force data. These are examples only; such distinctions are not necessarily required to be made by all embodiments, nor are distinctions limited only to those presented as examples.
It is noted that the determination need not be absolute or perfect. For example, the determination may include the possibility of error, and false positives and/or false negatives may be acceptable in at least some embodiments. It may be preferable to avoid false positives and/or false negatives, but the determination in step 1948 (and likewise certain other determinations herein) are not limited only to perfect determination. Indeed, it may be suitable in certain embodiments to consider the degree of confidence, e.g., a determination may be recorded (for example as part of registration, below) along with a confidence level, e.g., “92% confidence that force data corresponds with dispensing medication,” “high confidence,” “class II confidence,” etc.
Continuing in
Also, the registration 1950 of medication events does not necessarily exclude the registration of other events and/or data. For example, as noted with regard to step 1948 in certain embodiments it may be determined from force data whether certain faults have taken place with regard to dispensing medication, e.g., whether the cap was left on the container and nothing was dispensed, whether only air was dispensed because the container was not inclined, etc. While not necessarily considered medication events, such events nevertheless may be of interest. A pattern of only expelling air from the container may indicate difficulty in administering the drops, for example, or a pattern of leaving the cap on while squeezing the container may suggest absent-mindedness on the part of the user (a potentially illuminating symptom, medically) or deliberate deception (e.g., a clinical trial subject attempting to “game” the trial without taking the medication). In registering such events, even if no medication is dispensed, useful information may be obtained and/or useful conclusions drawn therefrom. Furthermore, it may be suitable to register the absence of medication being dispensed. That is, if medication were to be dispensed twice on a given day, and medication were only determined to be dispensed once or not at all, it may be useful to register that information. In such instance, a positive record may be created indicating that medication was not dispensed, rather than merely a lack of a record indicating that medication was dispensed.
Furthermore, if other sensors are present additional information not related to dispensing medication may be collected and/or registered. For example, considering a temperature-sensitive medication, if a temperature sensor is present on a container, in a jacket for the container, etc., it may be useful to register whether the temperature of that medication increases above a specified maximum (e.g., 25 degrees Centigrade). Maintaining medication at its proper temperature may or may not be considered to be part of compliance with a medication regimen, per se, however even if considered incidental and not part of compliance such information may be of use. For example, if a patient is not responding to a medication, and it is determined that the medication is not being kept below a specified temperature, this may present an opportunity for improving patient outcome by counseling the patient with regard to storage of their medication. Other sensors as may be suitable include, but are not limited to, a light sensor, an imager, a humidity sensor, an ultraviolet sensor, and an acoustic sensor.
Other data also may be similarly generated, evaluated, registered, etc.
Moving on to
In the method of
An eye drop medication squeeze container is inserted 2008 into the container cavity of the jacket via the force aperture, so as to be placed in contact with a force sensor on the jacket. The restraints are engaged 2010 with the medication container so as to retain the medication container in place. For example, the medication container may be obstructed from moving laterally out through the force aperture (or insertion aperture, etc.) by the restraints themselves, and while so held in the container cavity also may be obstructed from moving upward, downward, or laterally (other than through the force aperture) by upper, lower, and/or back obstacles. Such an arrangement is illustrated for example in
Again, as noted for certain embodiments steps 2008 and 2010 may be combined. Furthermore, for a medication container that may hold more than one dose of medication, steps 2004, 2006, 2008, and 2010 may be eliminated for most medication dispensing events (since the container will not need to be changed after each dose). Thus, in addition to combining/subdividing steps, steps also may be eliminated, and likewise also may be added, etc.
In addition, with regard to steps 2004, 2006, 2008, and 2010 it is considered for purposes of the arrangement in
Continuing in
The user handles 2016 the medication container. Since the medication container has been inserted 2008 into the jacket, handling 2016 the container may imply that the user is handling the jacket as well (and indeed for the example of
A sensor of the jacket generates 2020 proximity data. For example, one or more capacitive sensors disposed on/in the jacket (e.g., in a spine thereof) may detect whether the container is being picked up, held, etc. through changes in capacitance, and may generate 2020 proximity data reflecting such changes in capacitance. The proximity data is communicated 2022 from the proximity sensor to a processor of the jacket (e.g., as may be disposed within a shoe cavity thereof). A determination 2024 is made in the processor as to whether the proximity data corresponds with a user handling the container (e.g., as in step 2016). As noted with regard to force data in step 1948 in
Regardless of the manner of determination made in step 2024 and/or the confidence thereof, in response to a determination that the proximity data does correspond with the container being handled, motion sensors and force sensors in the jacket are activated 2026. For example, such activation may be performed by the processor, though other arrangements (e.g., a non-computational switching arrangement) also may be suitable. In the arrangement of
As described, in the example arrangement of
Still with reference to
Motion data is generated 2032 with a motion sensor of the jacket. For example, accelerometers, gyroscopes, etc. within the jacket may generate 2032 such motion data in response to the motion of the jacket (and the container therewith) in step 2028. The motion data is communicated 2034 to the processor of the jacket. It is noted that the term “motion data” is used for clarity; however, it should not be assumed that “motion data” necessarily is limited only to literal motion. For example, data indicating that “the container is inclined 85 degrees from vertical” may not, strictly speaking, refer to motion, but rather to orientation. Likewise, motion data as referred to herein may include position data, even if that position data does not literally refer to motion (e.g., change in position over time). Technically the orientation and/or position of a container may be referred to as “disposition,” however for purposes herein orientation and/or position (along with linear and angular acceleration, etc.) may be considered to be included in motion data unless otherwise noted.
The user applies 2036 dispensing force to the medication container via the second aspect (e.g., through a force aperture), so as to dispense medication. It is noted that the jacket passing the dispensing force is included herein in the example of
The medication container applies 2040 a transmitted force to a force sensor of the jacket, in response to the dispensing force being applied 2036 to the container. For example, given a force sensor in line with the second aspect and disposed on or in a surface of the container cavity, squeezing the medication container to dispense medication may inherently cause the container to press against the force sensor. Continuing in
The processor then determines 2048 whether the available combination of proximity data, motion data, and force data corresponds with medication being dispensed from the medication container. In the example of
However, not all embodiments necessarily will (or must) generate or consider multiple data sets. As noted previously, the example in
Still with reference to
It is emphasized that
Now with reference to
Specifically, with regard to
Thus, the arrangement shown in
The force sensor 2140 is adapted to detect indirect force such as transmitted force from a container as a user applies forces to that container to dispense medication (or other contents), and to generate force data therefrom. The type and/or particular functionality of the force sensor is not limited. For example, piezoelectric force sensors as may generate varying electrical signals in response to forces being applied thereto may be suitable for a force sensor 2140, but this is an example only and other arrangements may be suitable. Similarly, certain force sensors may detect only that force above a minimum threshold is being applied, others may detect a continuum of forces and/or measure the level of force applied, etc.
The processor 2142 is adapted to process force data provided by the force sensor 2140, in particular to make a determination therefrom as to whether the force data corresponds with a user dispensing medication (and/or some other relevant and/or notable event). The processor 2142 also may be adapted to register a dispensing event in response to making a determination that force data does indeed correspond to medication being dispensed. In the example of
The power supply 2150 is adapted to provide power, e.g., electrical energy, to the force sensor 2140 and/or the processor 2142 as needed, such that the force sensor 2140 and/or the processor 2142 may carry out functions as described. The form of the power supply is not limited. Suitable power supplies may include but are not limited to batteries and wired current. However other power supplies, such as wireless power “harvesters,” piezoelectric or kinetic power supplies that generate electricity from manipulation of the apparatus 2102, etc. also may be suitable.
Turning to
In addition, the apparatus 2202 includes a proximity sensor 2236 and a disposition sensor 2238 (as may also be referred to as a motion sensor). The proximity sensor 2236 and disposition sensor 2238 are in communication with the processor 2142 so as to provide data thereto (and/or to receive instructions therefrom, as noted with regard to the force sensor in
The proximity sensor 2236 is adapted to determine whether a user is proximate (e.g., physically contacting) the apparatus 2202 or some portion thereof, and to generate proximity data therefrom. The particulars of the proximity sensor 2236 are not limited. For example, certain proximity sensors may detect only physical contact, while others may detect that an object (e.g., the user) is near even without physical contact. Some proximity sensors may provide only binary data, e.g., the sensor is being touched or not, while others may provide information on how much area is being touched, with what pressure, etc. Suitable proximity sensors may include but are not limited to capacitance sensors as may determine proximity via changes in capacitance, pressure sensors as may determine proximity via pressures applied, conductivity sensors as may detect changes in conductivity (e.g., across the skin of a user contacting the apparatus 2202), etc., but other arrangements also may be suitable.
Similarly, the disposition sensor 2238 is adapted to determine one or more of the position, translation, orientation, rotation, etc. of the apparatus 2202 (and by extension a container engaged with the apparatus 2202). Again, the particulars of the disposition sensor 2238 are not limited. For example, certain disposition sensors may detect only active/current motion, e.g., translation and/or rotation that are currently taking place, while others may detect the position and/or orientation of the apparatus 2202 regardless of whether the apparatus 2202 is presently moving, and still others may detect linear and/or angular acceleration (rather than position or velocity per se), etc. Suitable disposition sensors may include but are not limited to accelerometers, gyroscopes, GPS and differential GPS sensors, etc.
As may be seen, the apparatus also includes a data store 2244, and outputter 2246, and a communicator 2248. Each of elements 2244, 2246, and 2248 may be adapted to perform functions relating to registration of medication events. For example, the data store 2244 may be adapted to register medication dispensing events by recording the event therein (and/or other information such as the dispensing time, sensor data, etc.). The outputter 2246 may be adapted to register dispensing events by presenting information to the user and/or other persons in the vicinity, for example by graphically displaying information, by audibly indicating that medication has been dispensed and/or is due to be dispensed, by telltales such as LEDs, etc. The communicator 2248 may be adapted to register dispensing events by sending information to some external party such as a database, a medical professional, a researcher, etc.
The above-described functions for elements 2244, 2246, and 2248 do not preclude those elements 2244, 2246, and 2248 from performing or being adapted to perform other functions (nor are additional functions prohibited for other elements). For example, the data store 2244 may store executable instructions thereon for instantiation onto the processor 2242, information on the medication, patient, etc., standards for carrying out various determinations described herein as being made, and so forth. The outputter may present information as may not be directly related to the taking of medication such as the current ambient temperature, the battery status of the apparatus 2202, etc. An outputter 2246 such as a graphical touch screen may accept inputs from users, thus serving as a control interface for the apparatus 2202 (though a separate interface also is not prohibited). A communicator 2248 may be adapted to receive software updates, submit requests for prescription refills, inform a manufacturer of a system malfunction, etc.
As may be seen, elements in
With regard to
With reference now specifically to
In
In addition, it is noted that the configuration shown in
In terms of function, it is noted that a body 2404 configured as a label may be constructed for example of rigid or semi-rigid material such as heavy paper, cardboard, various plastic films, etc. As described elsewhere herein it is not required that a given body completely prevent application of dispensing forces; thus, a label that is not entirely rigid and/or does not completely prevent deformation of a container therethrough may be suitable. In addition, it is noted that a body in the form of a label may be, in itself, a “dumb” device. That is, the label (e.g., body) may not have sensors, a processor, etc. disposed therein. In more colloquial terms, the label may be just a label, albeit a label with suitable extent, shape, and rigidity as to facilitate indirect sensing as described herein, etc. In such instance, smart components (sensors, processor, etc.) may be distinct from (though possibly engaged with) the body, e.g., being disposed within a foot, shoe, spine, etc. Such configuration may be suited for disposability on the part of the body (e.g., the body is thrown away with the container when the container is empty), while a foot, shoe, spine, etc. with sensors, processors, etc. therein are moved from an empty container to a full one and reused.
Even in instances wherein no active elements may be present on a body/label, such a “dumb” body/label is not necessarily required to be entirely inert; electrical traces for carrying electrical energy and/or other features may be present. For example, considering a label, electrical traces may be printed onto a label with conductive ink, applied as adhesive or laminated “press on” elements, etc. In such instances non-conductive material may also be used to insulate and/or physically protect those traces, e.g., nonconductive ink, laminated plastic film, sprayed-on lacquer, etc.
In addition, in certain embodiments sensors and/or other components may be part of a label. For example, an element such as a capacitive sensor for detecting proximity may be printed as layers of conductive ink with non-conductive material therebetween (e.g., nonconductive ink, laminated plastic film, sprayed-on lacquer, etc.) Alternately, an element such as a piezoelectric sensor for detecting forces may be provided in a relatively flat form and attached to a label as part of a fabrication process for labels, e.g., as a “press on” element in a multi-layer label (though at least in principle it may be possible to print a piezoelectric element and/or other elements directly, which also may be suitable). Thus, in at least certain embodiments, a body may take the form of a “smart label,” with some (though not necessarily all) “smart” functional elements therein.
Although such variations regarding a body that is “dumb,” “smart,” or somewhere in between (e.g., with functioning conductive paths but no other hardware) are described with regard to a label in this example, it is emphasized that such features apply similarly to other bodies regardless of form (e.g., bodies that are not labels), including but not limited to the body 2404 shown in
Now with reference to
Such an arrangement as shown in
Turning to
Alternately, certain medication containers, including but not limited to squeeze bottles, may themselves be at least somewhat flexible. Thus, even if the body 2604 as shown in
The arrangement in
It is emphasized that the various configurations shown herein are examples only, and are not limiting. Other arrangements may be equally suitable. For example, while in certain examples herein bodies and/or other structures are shown as being opaque for clarity, it may be suitable for some embodiments to have a body, a portion thereof, etc. that is translucent or transparent. Such changes are not necessarily merely cosmetic considerations; a translucent body may facilitate the use of certain sensors, such as optical sensors; a transparent body similarly may facilitate certain sensors, and/or also may enable a label to be read through a body Likewise, while certain examples presented herein are shown as distinct from a container, e.g., in the form of a body that removably engages with the container, this also is not necessarily required for all embodiments. For example, in some embodiments a body may be injection molded in place around an existing container, e.g., by disposing the container in a mold and over-molding additional plastic (or other material) around the container. Such an overmolded body may be fixedly engaged with the container; thus, the restraints (insofar as distinct restraints may be identified) may be the overmolding geometry, and/or adhesion between the overmolded plastic and the plastic of the container. For example, if the container and overmolded body are both thermoplastics, the container and body may fuse together during overmolding. Such fusing may result in the container and overmolded body being essentially “one part,” e.g., fused to the point that removing the body may destroy the container; such permanent engagement is not required, but also is not prohibited.
Similarly, in certain embodiments the body may be fully integral with a container itself, for example being molded together with the container. In such instance, the “body” may essentially be an extension of the wall of the container, e.g., a thicker portion in the container wall that may serve to obstruct dispensing forces from a first aspect. (A force sensor for such an embodiment may be internal to the container wall/body, such as being molded inside the container wall. Alternately, a force sensor and/or other sensor may be attached to the container wall/body as or in a spine distinct from the container wall/body; likewise, a foot may be present and/or a separate shoe may be attached to the container, etc.) Such an integral arrangement may lack restraints in any meaningful sense; in colloquial terms the body may be just a thick spot in the wall. However, such an arrangement may be suitable for certain embodiments.
Now with reference to
In various embodiments, the processing system 2700 operates as a standalone device, although the processing system 2700 may be connected (e.g., wired or wirelessly) to other machines. In a networked deployment, the processing system 2700 may operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment.
The processing system 2700 may be a server, a personal computer (PC), a tablet computer, a laptop computer, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a mobile phone, a processor, a telephone, a web appliance, a network router, switch or bridge, a console, a hand-held console, a (hand-held) gaming device, a music player, any portable, mobile, hand-held device, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by the processing system.
While the main memory 2706, non-volatile memory 2710, and storage medium 2726 (also called a “machine-readable medium) are shown to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” and “storage medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store one or more sets of instructions 2728. The term “machine-readable medium” and “storage medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding, or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the processing system and that cause the processing system to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the presently disclosed embodiments.
In general, the routines executed to implement the embodiments of the disclosure, may be implemented as part of an operating system or a specific application, component, program, object, module or sequence of instructions referred to as “computer programs.” The computer programs typically comprise one or more instructions (e.g., instructions 2704, 2708, 2728) set at various times in various memory and storage devices in a computer, and that, when read and executed by one or more processing units or processors 2702, cause the processing system 2700 to perform operations to execute elements involving the various aspects of the disclosure.
Moreover, while embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.
Further examples of machine-readable storage media, machine-readable media, or computer-readable (storage) media include, but are not limited to, recordable type media such as volatile and non-volatile memory devices 2710, floppy and other removable disks, hard disk drives, optical disks (e.g., Compact Disk Read-Only Memory (CD ROMS), Digital Versatile Disks, (DVDs)), and transmission type media such as digital and analog communication links.
The network adapter 2712 enables the processing system 2700 to mediate data in a network 2714 with an entity that is external to the computing device 2700, through any known and/or convenient communications protocol supported by the processing system 2700 and the external entity. The network adapter 2712 can include one or more of a network adaptor card, a wireless network interface card, a router, an access point, a wireless router, a switch, a multilayer switch, a protocol converter, a gateway, a bridge, bridge router, a hub, a digital media receiver, and/or a repeater.
The network adapter 2712 can include a firewall that can, in some embodiments, govern and/or manage permission to access/proxy data in a computer network, and track varying levels of trust between different machines and/or applications. The firewall can be any number of modules having any combination of hardware and/or software components able to enforce a predetermined set of access rights between a particular set of machines and applications, machines and machines, and/or applications and applications, for example, to regulate the flow of traffic and resource sharing between these varying entities. The firewall may additionally manage and/or have access to an access control list which details permissions including for example, the access and operation rights of an object by an individual, a machine, and/or an application, and the circumstances under which the permission rights stand.
As indicated above, the computer-implemented systems introduced here can be implemented by hardware (e.g., programmable circuitry such as microprocessors), software, firmware, or a combination of such forms. For example, some computer-implemented systems may be embodied entirely in special-purpose hardwired (i.e., non-programmable) circuitry. Special-purpose circuitry can be in the form of, for example, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.
The foregoing description of various embodiments of the claimed subject matter has been provided for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the claimed subject matter to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to one skilled in the art. Embodiments were chosen and described in order to best describe the principles of the invention and its practical applications, thereby enabling others skilled in the relevant art to understand the claimed subject matter, the various embodiments, and the various modifications that are suited to the particular uses contemplated.
While embodiments have been described in the context of fully functioning computers and computer systems, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various embodiments are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that the disclosure applies equally regardless of the particular type of machine or computer-readable media used to actually effect the distribution.
Although the above Detailed Description describes certain embodiments and the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the embodiments can be practiced in many ways. Details of the systems and methods may vary considerably in their implementation details, while still being encompassed by the specification. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of various embodiments should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the invention with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless those terms are explicitly defined herein. Accordingly, the actual scope of the invention encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the embodiments under the claims.
The language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and it may not have been selected to delineate or circumscribe the inventive subject matter. It is therefore intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this Detailed Description, but rather by any claims that issue on an application based hereon. Accordingly, the disclosure of various embodiments is intended to be illustrative, but not limiting, of the scope of the embodiments, which is set forth in the following claims.