The present invention relates to personal area networks (PANs). More particularly, the present invention is directed to method and apparatus to provide the capability of utilizing one of the devices in a personal area network as a gateway for other devices in the personal area network and to provide criteria for aid in determining advisability to make a high level handoff from one enterprise network to another to effect savings in costs and weight and volume of the PAN devices.
Personal area networks (PANs) are presently underdeveloped. One instance of such networks is the ad hoc communication of portable devices that users often carry around. As an example, a user may travel with a cell phone, personal digital assistant (PDA) portable computer (i.e., laptop) and an electronic wallet all of which fulfill specific needs for the user. The need for some or all of these devices to communicate at least occasionally with enterprise networks external to the PAN is either already a present demand or will become a natural occurrence in the immediate future. Rather than provide each such device with its own built-in capability of communicating with enterprise networks, one of the PAN devices may be selected to make the connection and act as a gateway for all of the other devices, leading to a significant saving in total device cost and weight volume needs a reduction in and complexity for all of the devices collectively.
Another developing area is the use of wireless local area networks (WLANs), which have been recognized as useful alternatives for connecting what are normally identified as wide area devices, such as cell phones, to localized hot spot areas. The ability of a device to switch between WAN and WLAN networks is being integrated into such devices.
The simultaneous use of both of the above developments in such devices has not been addressed in the marketplace but has been clearly recognized as a useful combination. Nevertheless, there are problems with switching the connection of many devices versus only switching one device between disparate networks. However, the question arises as to whether in general will the needs for each and every function be serviced by one connection be suitably serviced by the other connection and, if not, should such a switch be made.
The switching of wide area communicating devices without regard to other devices of the PAN utilizing the link may lead to many problems depending on the functions involved which include: excessive latency, insufficient data rates, excessive errors, inadequate security and high costs, for example.
The present invention provides method and apparatus for establishing a high level handoff based on pre-determined criteria thereby providing a more efficient design and use of the interconnectible devices of a PAN.
The present invention will be better understood from a consideration of the drawings, in which like elements are designated by like numerals and, wherein:
In the example shown, cell phone 14 is selected to serve as the gateway between other components of the PAN 12 and the enterprise network 20. The link may be wireless LW or wired LNW. For example, link LNW may be used when coupling to a public service telephone network (PSTN). Conventional wireless or wired interfaces presently in use may be employed for coupling of network 20 to the various components of the PAN and specifically the gateway component which, in the example shown, is a cellular phone 14.
For example, the desired capabilities for cell phone 14 are: isochronous operation, moderate data rate and low latency handoff. In the example given, the connections and needs of cell phone 14 adequately match with network 26 which, in the example given, is a global system for mobile communications (GSM).
The PDA 18 characteristics are optionally security and adequate data rate. These criteria are shown as being compatible with both the GSM 26 and a wireless local area network (WLAN) 28.
The characteristics of the electronic checkbook are low latency, security and error free exchanges which, in the example shown, are compatible only with the WLAN 28.
Therefore it becomes extremely advantageous to provide the gateway device with decision-making capability which takes into account the other devices of the PAN desiring to utilize the link to be created.
The requirements and link capabilities may be stored in a program within the gateway device to facilitate a decision either independently of the user or based upon the user's selection. Although the gateway device shown herein is a cell phone, another device may be selected as the gateway device, dependent upon the particular application, the capability of the devices (e.g. available links, power availability, processing capability), and/or the user's preference.
At step S1 where a handoff opportunity has been identified, the program advances to step S2, either automatically or through user initiated action, to determine if there is any benefit to switching, for example, from network 26 to 28 (or vice versa). This decision is made by examining the criteria for the handoff, which may include, but is not limited to: latency, data rates, security, distance, signal strength. Assuming, after the examination of the stored criteria, there is no benefit to switching, the program jumps to step S3, causing an exit in the program with no setting of a switch flag which may, for example, provide a display of a single lamp or LED or a word or words or other indicia provided on the display 14a of the cell phone 18 and/or an audible message provided through a speaker 14b of the cell phone 14.
Assuming, on the other hand, that, based on the stored criteria, the benefit to performing a switch operation is established, the program jumps to step S4 to determine whether all the active devices are capable of functioning with, i.e. are compatible with, the new network. The criteria necessary for arriving at such decision is stored in the memory (not shown for purposes of simplicity) within the cell phone 14 or may be a plug-in or add-on 14a to the cell phone 14 shown in
Assuming that not all of the active devices are capable of functioning with the new network, the program jumps from junction step S4 to step S6. At this step, the program refers to criteria stored for determining whether it is appropriate to prompt the user to make the decision, which criteria may, for example, be the number of PAN devices which are compatible, prioritizing importance of the PAN devices, etc.
Assuming the criteria examined establishes that the user should not be prompted to decide, the program jumps to step S3 and exiting therefrom with no “switch flag.”
Assuming, however, that the criteria establishes that the user should be prompted to decide, the program jumps to step S7 whereupon a display is given to the user inquiring as to whether the switch to another network should proceed. The user, upon observing the query, which may be accompanied by a sound message stored within the cell phone 14 or alternatively be limited to either a sound message or a visual display, selects as to whether the switching should proceed by to branching to step S5 or that no switching should occur, thereby branching to step S3.
The technique of the present invention is not limited to use for switching from one network to another and may also be employed to facilitate selection of one of a plurality of networks greater than two (2) to be linked with the gateway device.
This novel technique/arrangement greatly facilitates, simplifies and speeds up the decision making process.
This application claims priority from Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/385,119 filed Jun. 3, 2002 and patent application Ser. No. 10/447,891 filed May 29, 2003, which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5371738 | Moelard et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5999811 | Molne | Dec 1999 | A |
6128489 | Seazholtz et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6205128 | Le | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6278877 | Brederveld et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6600903 | Lilja et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6965948 | Eneborg et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7016323 | Yun et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7190703 | Heitmann | Mar 2007 | B1 |
20020051432 | Shin | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068566 | Ohlsson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020187780 | Souissi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030078002 | Sanjeev et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030125028 | Reynolds | Jul 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002-186022 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2000-0065220 | Nov 2000 | KR |
2001-0090111 | Oct 2001 | KR |
2002-0032584 | May 2002 | KR |
0054523 | Sep 2000 | WO |
0135585 | May 2001 | WO |
0148977 | Jul 2001 | WO |
02062094 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050201348 A1 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60385119 | Jun 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10447891 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 11127577 | US |