1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the field of transaction processing methods and apparatus. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and apparatus for issuing and processing gift certificates which may be issued and redeemed in conjunction with credit card accounts.
2. Description of the Related Art
Businesses and consumers have employed a variety of transaction processing methods and apparatus to facilitate commerce while preventing fraud. In particular, credit card issuers facilitate hundreds of billions of dollars of purchases every year by allowing customers to conveniently pay for purchases utilizing their account services. For these services, the credit card issuers receive transaction fees from the merchants, as well as interest payments on all outstanding balances and annual fees from customers. In an effort to generate more revenues, many credit card issuers have developed marketing programs to encourage card holders to make more purchases with their credit cards.
In addition, the existence and use of store-type or specific-use gift certificates have proven transaction processing benefits. Typically, such gift certificates are issued by a store in pre-defined face value amounts. The consumer pays for the gift certificate in advance and then gives the certificate to a recipient who later redeems the certificate. A significant disadvantage associated with traditional gift certificates, however is that since the certificates are prepaid, the card holder pays for the certificates even if they are subsequently lost or never used. Further, there is presently no way to verify the authenticity of such gift certificates, making them prone to fraudulent duplication or alteration.
Some shopping malls offer mall-wide gift certificates which can be used at any store in a particular mall. Typically, these certificates are standard commercial checks with the mall checking account number printed thereon. Usually, any store in the mall accepts the gift certificate because it can be deposited in the same manner as a personal check. Typically, the mall takes the money from customers and places it in a checking account to “back-up” or cover the gift certificate check. These certificates, however, have the disadvantage of being easy to fraudulently duplicate.
Credit card companies have developed marketing programs that incorporate many of the features of gift certificates as described above. General Electric Company's GE Rewards Visa Credit Card program, for example, allows a credit card customer to automatically receive a five dollar rebate certificate for a specified volume of charges. The rebate certificates are automatically included in the credit card customer's monthly billing statement in the form of laser-printed vouchers. Although the rebate certificates are bearer instruments, making them easily redeemable, they may only be redeemed at the specific merchant or franchise printed on the face of the rebate certificate, reducing the redemption options of the recipient. Additionally, because there is no online verification of authenticity, the rebate certificates are vulnerable to counterfeit fraud.
To provide greater access to funds to card holders and to promote account activity, some credit card issuers offer convenience checks to their customers. These checks carry indicia directly linking the check to a customer's credit card account and can be used by the card holder as payment in the same manner as conventional personal checks. One difference between convenience checks and personal checks is that the former are treated as cash advances against a card holder's available credit line, instead of being deducted from money on deposit in a checking account. Large numbers of convenience checks are regularly mailed by banks and card issuers as way to promote additional consumer charge volume, encouraging consumers to build up credit card balances. Moreover, convenience checks are also used to encourage card holders to pay off other credit cards they might hold, thereby, effectively transferring the balance. Because there is no online authentication process, however, these checks are subject to the same fraud problems as conventional checks and gift certificates.
With losses from check fraud now exceeding ten billion dollars per year, many merchants are only willing to accept a personal check if the check is accompanied by photo identification as well as a major credit card to prevent fraud. For this reason, convenience checks are not well suited as gift items since a recipient's name cannot be pre-printed on the check. Additionally, card holders with balances near their credit line may be reluctant to make further purchases after giving out convenience checks to recipients, thereby defeating the purpose of incenting charge volume. Convenience checks returned to the issuer for clearing might result in the card holder's account exceeding the established limit if the card holder had made additional purchases.
Some credit card companies have offered other limited-use programs combining credit cards with gift certificates, such as the AMERICAN EXPRESS GIFT CHECK program and the AMERICAN EXPRESS “BE MY GUEST” program. The AMERICAN EXPRESS GIFT CHECK program allowed card holders to purchase pre-paid “gift checks” in certain specified denominations by either paying for them in cash or by charging them to their AMERICAN EXPRESS account. Once paid for and provided to a card holder, the gift check could be given to a recipient who may redeem the gift check at a merchant. Because the gift checks are processed in the same manner as traveler's checks, the recipient can only redeem such checks wherever AMERICAN EXPRESS traveler's checks are accepted, reducing the utility of the checks. Additionally, gift checks stolen in the mail may be fraudulently redeemed.
The AMERICAN EXPRESS “BE MY GUEST” program used a variable-value gift certificate known as a “BE MY GUEST” certificate. This gift certificate entitled a recipient, for example, to a meal at a participating restaurant at a card holder's expense. The certificate is accompanied by an AMERICAN EXPRESS charge slip in which the gift amount and card holder's credit card account number are already recorded. The card holder obtains the certificate from AMERICAN EXPRESS by requesting the same, and is charged the full designated value when the certificate is used or presented to a participating restaurant. The conventional credit card clearing process provides online authentication of the certificate. Minimal fraud prevention is provided in that a user presenting falsified to duplicate certificates will eventually be denied service since the card holder's credit limit will eventually be exceeded. However, although losses to restaurants are potentially capped at the credit limit of the card holder, the card holder and card issuer still may experience substantial losses. In addition, attempts to fraudulently alter the amount of the certificate may not be detected, thereby allowing for more casual fraud. There are also significant security problems associated with the use of the certificates since the recipient can see the credit card account holder's AMERICAN EXPRESS account number. The recipient or an unscrupulous third party may receive the certificate, write down the account number, use the certificate, and then use the card number for purchases made over the Internet or by telephone.
Accordingly, it would be advantageous to provide an improved method and apparatus for issuing, redeeming and authorizing gift certificates that overcomes the shortcomings associated with the related art. The present invention addresses such problems by providing an apparatus and processing approach that have not previously been proposed.
The present invention provides a method and apparatus for redeeming a gift certificate drawn on a credit card or other financial account. A first aspect of the present invention is directed toward a merchant card authorization terminal. According to this first aspect, the present invention includes the step of receiving a gift certificate for payment of an identified value. The gift certificate, which is issued by an account issuer, includes thereon a certificate identifier corresponding to an account identifier. The account identifier identifies the financial account from which funds will be drawn to support the gift certificate transaction.
The method of redeeming a gift certificate at a merchant card authorization terminal further includes the step of transmitting a request for authorization, including the certificate identifier, to a central server. The merchant card authorization terminal then receives an authorization code from the central server. The received authorization code represents an indication that redemption of the gift certificate for the identified value is authorized. The method also includes receiving a payment from the account issuer based on said identified value of the gift certificate.
A second aspect of the present invention is directed toward a credit card issuer central controller. According to the second aspect of the present invention, a method is disclosed for authorizing the redemption of a gift certificate drawn on a credit card or other financial account. The method includes the step of receiving a request to authorize redemption of a gift certificate for an identified value. The request includes a certificate identifier. The method further includes the steps of determining an account identifier based on the certificate identifier, and accessing stored account data associated with the account identifier.
According to the second aspect of the present invention, the method also includes the step of analyzing the account data to determine whether to authorize the redemption of the identified gift certificate. An authorization code is then transmitted to a remote terminal. The authorization code represents an indication that redemption of the identified gift certificate is authorized. The method still further includes the step of updating the account data to reflect redemption of the identified gift certificate for the identified value.
An apparatus is also disclosed and claimed to implement the methods of the present invention.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for more securely redeeming gift certificates associated with a credit card or other financial account. Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus for issuing and redeeming gift certificates utilizing a secure alias account identifier. The above object and other objects, features and advantages are readily apparent from the detailed description when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof may be readily obtained by reference to the following detailed description when considered with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
A first embodiment of the method and apparatus of the present invention will now be discussed with reference to
As illustrated by system 100, in the first embodiment of the present invention, a credit card issuer 102 produces a gift certificate associated with a credit card account. According to the present invention, a gift certificate may be any instrument or token which represents financial value, including a traditional paper certificate, a stored value card, or a magnetic stripe card having an alias account number thereon. Credit card issuer 102 may be a bank or other entity having the sub-systems necessary to issue and maintain general purpose credit/debit accounts. Credit card issuer 102 assigns a corresponding certificate identifier which may be used to identify the certificate and the associated credit card account. Accordingly, the certificate identifier is an alias identifier which provides an indirect link to the credit card account of credit card holder 104. Preferably, the gift certificate identifier is a sixteen digit numeric value, which has not been previously assigned to an existing credit card account, so as to be compatible with conventional credit card transaction processing systems. The gift certificate, including the certificate identifier, is distributed to credit card holder 104, the party responsible for the account.
According to the first embodiment, credit card holder 104 determines a maximum value for the certificate and transfers the certificate, including the certificate identifier and an indication of the maximum value, to recipient 106. Recipient 106 may then present the gift certificate to pay for goods and/or services at participating merchants, such as merchant 108. A participating merchant is one that is capable of processing credit card transactions on behalf of the credit card issuer designated on the gift certificate, such as gift certificate 820 more fully described with reference to
To verify the authenticity of the gift certificate, merchant 108 transmits the certificate identifier and a redemption amount to credit card processor 110. Such transmission may be accomplished using a conventional telecommunications link and a card authorization terminal (“CAT”) such as a VeriFone model OMNI® 490. Credit card processor 110, such as First Data Corp., acting as a commercial clearing house for credit card transactions, receives the data and forwards the data to credit card issuer 102. Credit card issuer 102 determines whether the gift certificate identifier is valid and whether the associated credit card account has sufficient available credit to honor the gift certificate. If the received data indicates that the gift certificate is not authentic or that the credit card account cannot support the redemption amount, credit card issuer 102 transmits an authorization code indicating that the transaction is declined to credit card processor 110. Otherwise, credit card issuer 102 transmits an authorization code indicating that the transaction is approved to credit card processor 110. In either event, credit card processor 110 forwards the authorization code to merchant 108 for completion of the transaction.
Referring now to
As shown in
Referring now to
Data Tables
Account identifier field 410 stores a unique account identifier. Account identifier field 410 is assigned by the credit card issuer to uniquely identify an account of a card holder. In the present embodiment, the unique account identifier will be a standard 16 digit credit card account number, although more or fewer digits may be used.
Card holder name element 412 stores the name of a card holder 104 who is primarily associated with the account described by the account table record. Card holder name element may be a single field, but will more likely be a combination of fields, including first name, last name, and middle initial. In the case of joint accounts, more than one name may be stored.
Address element 414 stores the mailing address of the card holder. Although the preferred embodiment shows only one address element, it may be useful to provide multiple address elements to accommodate a home address, a billing address and a business address. Address element 414 may be a single field, but preferably includes a combination of fields, including street, city, state, and postal code.
Telephone number field 416 stores the home telephone number of the card holder 104 responsible for the account. Additional telephone numbers, such as office and facsimile numbers, may also be stored in account table 400.
Original credit line field 418 stores the maximum amount of credit that the credit card issuer has provided to the card holder responsible for the account. Available credit line field 420 stores the amount of unused credit available to the credit card holder responsible for the account.
Referring now to
Expiration date field 516 stores the date on which the associated certificate expires; status field 518 stores a code representing the status of the associated certificate; and security code field 520 stores a security code which may be required to authorize a recipient's redemption of the associated certificate. The second embodiment of the present invention employing a security code is described more fully with reference to
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, personalized challenge field 522 and personalized response field 524 may be employed to improve the security of gift certificates. Generally, field 522 stores a challenge which is presented to the recipient of a gift certificate at the time of redemption via the card authorization terminal to verify the identity of the person attempting to redeem the gift certificate. The contents of field 522 may be defined by either the credit card holder or the intended recipient. Similarly, the correct response to the challenge stored in field 522 is stored in field 524. Like the challenge, the response may be defined by either the credit card holder or the intended recipient, allowing the security challenge and response to be personalized.
The remaining field 526 stores the remaining number of times the gift certificate may be used. Field 526 will be initially populated with “1” for a record corresponding to a single use gift certificate. For a multiple use gift certificate, field 526 may be populated with a code indicating the multiple use nature of the corresponding gift certificate. Value remaining field 528 stores the remaining value for which the gift certificate may be redeemed. Prior to redeeming the corresponding gift certificate, the contents of value remaining field 528 will equal the contents of maximum value field 514. One of ordinary skill in the art will realize that variations and combinations of fields 526 and 528 may be implemented.
Certificate table 500 contains three records: 502, 504 and 506. Record 502 represents a single-use gift certificate payable up to $50.00 which was redeemed for $47.54. Record 504 represents a gift certificate of unlimited number of uses up to a total of $100.00. Record 506 represents a multiple-use gift certificate for up to $50.00. According to record 506, the gift certificate has been redeemed at least once for a total of $47.95 leaving a remaining value of $2.05.
Referring now to
Date field 612, time field 614 and transaction amount field 620 store data describing the date, time and amount of the transaction, respectively. Reference code field 616 stores data uniquely identifying the transaction, and authorization code field 618 stores the code transmitted to the merchant representing authorization for the transaction.
Referring now to
Gift certificate 800 further includes a certificate identifier 818 and the name of the credit card issuer 820. The sixteen-digit certificate identifier 818 is, in fact, a corresponding alias account number. There is no way for a person to visually inspect gift certificate 800 to discern the account number belonging to credit card holder 812. The person would only see the certificate identifier (alias account number) and would not have access to the entire available credit line of the credit card holder. The name of the credit card issuer 820 is provided to indicate that the gift certificate is redeemable by any merchant who accepts credit cards from the designated issuer.
Having thus described the system architecture and components of the present embodiment, the operation of the system will now be described in greater detail with reference to FIGS. 9 and 10A-10C with continuing reference to
Referring now to
According to the redemption process, the merchant receives a gift certificate as payment for goods or services. Upon the merchant's receipt of the gift certificate, the card authorization terminal of the merchant, as shown at step 910, reads the certificate identifier and determines the redemption amount. As previously indicated, the certificate identifier is preferably printed on the certificate for easy reading by a merchant, but the certificate identifier could easily be included on a paper certificate in machine readable form through the use of bar codes, magnetic stripes or “MICR” type face. If the certificate is embodied in a magnetic stripe card or stored value card, the certificate identifier and other information can be stored and read using the magnetic stripe or other data storage device such as RAM.
The redemption amount is determined based on the face value of the certificate and the value of the goods and/or services to be purchased. If the face value of the gift certificate is less than or equal to the value of the goods and/or services to be purchased, the redemption amount equals the face value of the gift certificate. If the face value of the gift certificate is greater than the value of the goods and/or services to be purchased, the redemption amount may be set equal to either the face value of the gift certificate or the value of the goods and/or services to be purchased, possibly depending on whether the gift certificate is a single-use gift certificate or a gift certificate which may be partially used, such as a stored value card. As shown at step 912, the card authorization terminal then transmits a request for authorization, including the certificate identifier and the redemption amount, to CCP 300.
At step 914, the card authorization terminal receives an authorization code from CCP 300 indicating whether the transaction is authorized. As illustrated by decision step 916, if-the-transaction is authorized, the card authorization terminal processes the gift certificate transaction at step 920. If the received authorization signal indicates that the transaction is not authorized, the card authorization terminal denies redemption of the gift certificate according to step 918.
Referring now to
At step 1012, CCI 200 searches certificate identifier field 510 of certificate table 500 for relevant certificate data based on the received certificate identifier. CCI 200 then determines if the received certificate identifier is valid, as shown by step 1014. A received certificate identifier is valid if a record having a matching certificate identifier is found and if status field 518 of the record indicates that the certificate is “active.” If CCI 200 determines that the received certificate identifier is not valid, CCI 200 transmits an authorization code declining the transaction, as shown by step 1016. If CCI 200 determines that the received certificate identifier is valid, CCI 200 retrieves the corresponding record from certificate table 500 at step 1018.
As shown by steps 1020-1022, CCI 200 then retrieves the system date/time and compares it to the certificate expiration date stored in field 516 and determines whether the gift certificate bearing the certificate identifier has expired. If the gift certificate has expired, CCI 200 performs step 1024 and transmits an authorization code declining the redemption of the identified gift certificate. Otherwise, CCI 200 performs step 1026 and compares the received redemption amount to the value stored in maximum value field 514. According to step 1028, if the redemption amount is greater than the value stored in field 514, CCI 200 performs step 1030 and transmits an authorization code declining the redemption of the gift certificate. If the redemption value is less than or equal to the maximum value of the gift certificate, CCI 200 retrieves the associated credit card account record from table 400 and compares the redemption value to the amount stored in available credit line field 420.
If sufficient credit is not available, CCI 200 transmits an authorization code declining the transaction, as shown by steps 1034 and 1036. If sufficient credit is available, CCI 200 processes step 1038 and records transaction information in transaction table 600. CCI 200 then updates status field 518 of the relevant record of certificate table 500 to indicate redemption of the certificate and transmits an authorization code allowing the gift certificate redemption, as shown by steps 1040 and 1042.
Security Code Embodiment
An alternate embodiment of the method and apparatus of the present invention will now be discussed with reference to
System 1100 depicted in
Credit card holder 104 then transfers the gift certificate, including the certificate identifier and an indication of the maximum value, to recipient 106. In addition, credit card holder 104 transmits the security code to recipient 106. Of course, the distribution of the gift certificate and security code could occur in other ways. For example, if credit card holder 104 provided credit card issuer with the address of the recipient, credit card issuer could distribute both the gift certificate and the security code directly to the recipient. Preferably, credit card issuer 102 would separate the gift certificate and security code and stagger the delivery of the two items to improve security.
Upon receiving both the gift certificate and the security code, recipient 106 may then present the gift certificate to pay for goods and/or services at participating merchants, such as merchant 108. Upon presentment of the gift certificate, merchant 108 requests and receives the security code from recipient 106. As in system 100, merchant 108 verifies the authenticity of the gift certificate via credit card processor 110.
To verify the authenticity of the gift certificate, merchant 108 transmits the certificate identifier, the security code received from recipient 106 and a redemption amount to credit card processor 110. Credit card processor receives the data and forwards the data to credit card issuer 102. Credit card issuer 102 determines whether the gift certificate identifier is valid, whether the associated credit card account has sufficient available credit to honor the gift certificate and whether the security code received from merchant 108 matches the stored security code associated with the certificate identifier. As in system 100, credit card issuer 102 transmits an authorization code to credit card processor 110, indicating that the transaction is declined or approved. In either event, credit card processor 110 forwards the authorization code to merchant 108 for completion of the transaction.
In addition to the previously described embodiments of the gift certificate of the present invention, the gift certificate may take the form of a card or ticket 1200 as depicted in
Referring now to
At step 1314, the card authorization terminal determines whether the authenticity of the recipient should be locally verified. This may be accomplished by receiving a signal from the card authorization terminal operator, by sensing the presence of a scratch-off area of the gift certificate or by any method known by one of ordinary skill. If the determination of decision step 1314 is positive, the authenticity of the recipient is verified locally. In the case of a gift certificate embodied as a scratch-off card, this is accomplished manually by the merchant who may scratch off the removable latex covering to reveal the security code of the certificate. In the case of a gift certificate embodied as a card with a magnetic stripe, the card authorization terminal compares the security code received from recipient 106 with a security code stored on the magnetic stripe. Steps 916 and 920 of the process are substantially the same as those described with reference to
Referring now to
At step 1412, CCI 200 determines whether the security code received from recipient 106 is valid. This is accomplished by comparing the received security code with the security code stored in field 520 of the relevant record from certificate table 500. If CCI 200 determines that the received security code is not valid, CCI 200 transmits an authorization code declining the transaction, as shown by step 1414. If CCI 200 determines that the received security code is valid, CCI 200 continues processing at step 1020. Steps 1012-1042 are performed as described with reference to
While the best mode for carrying out the invention has been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which the invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention. These alternative embodiments are within the scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention embodies the scope of the claims appended hereto.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/997,680 filed Dec. 23, 1997, and now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,193,155 on Feb. 27, 2001; which is a continuation-in-part of commonly owned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/762,128 entitled “Postpaid Traveler's Checks” filed Dec. 9, 1996, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,798,508 on Aug. 25, 1998; and which is a continuation in part of commonly owned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/858,738 entitled “System and Process for Issuing and Managing Forced Redemption Vouchers having Alias Account Numbers” filed May 19, 1997, now abandoned; wherein the entirety of each is incorporated by reference herein. This application is related to “Dynamically Changing System for Fulfilling Concealed Value Gift Certificate Obligations,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/994,124, filed Dec. 19, 1997, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,138,106 on Dec. 19, 1997; the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein. This application is also related to: U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/423,158, filed Jun. 9, 2006; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/423,160, filed Jun. 9, 2006 and now abandoned and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/423,161, filed Jun. 9, 2006 and now abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3594727 | Braun | Jul 1971 | A |
3617638 | Jochimsen et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3697693 | Deschenes | Oct 1972 | A |
3950015 | Shrock | Apr 1976 | A |
3985998 | Crafton | Oct 1976 | A |
4672377 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4752676 | Leonard et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4809837 | Hayashi | Mar 1989 | A |
4837422 | Dethloff et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4997188 | Nilssen | Mar 1991 | A |
5010485 | Bigari | Apr 1991 | A |
5036472 | Buckley et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5083782 | Nilssen | Jan 1992 | A |
5200889 | Mori | Apr 1993 | A |
5350906 | Brody et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5357563 | Hamilton | Oct 1994 | A |
5377271 | Foreman et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5399874 | Gonsalves et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5426281 | Abecassis | Jun 1995 | A |
5437478 | Gaines | Aug 1995 | A |
5440108 | Tran et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5477047 | Nakagawa et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5513117 | Small | Apr 1996 | A |
5537314 | Kanter | Jul 1996 | A |
5546523 | Gatto | Aug 1996 | A |
5621201 | Langhans et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5652421 | Veeneman et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5684291 | Taskett | Nov 1997 | A |
5686713 | Rivera | Nov 1997 | A |
5724424 | Gifford | Mar 1998 | A |
5765141 | Spector | Jun 1998 | A |
5798508 | Walker et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5845260 | Nakano et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5845267 | Ronen | Dec 1998 | A |
5855007 | Jovicic et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5864830 | Armetta et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870718 | Spector | Feb 1999 | A |
5883810 | Franklin et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5899980 | Wilf et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903880 | Biffar | May 1999 | A |
5905736 | Ronen et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909673 | Gregory | Jun 1999 | A |
5913203 | Wong et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918909 | Fiala et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5953710 | Fleming | Sep 1999 | A |
6000832 | Franklin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6049785 | Gifford | Apr 2000 | A |
6138106 | Walker et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6193155 | Walker et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195649 | Gifford | Feb 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61276084 | Dec 1986 | JP |
62121574 | Jun 1987 | JP |
3164891 | Jul 1991 | JP |
7065087 | Mar 1995 | JP |
8180232 | Jul 1996 | JP |
WO 8603310 | Jun 1986 | WO |
WO8603310 | Jun 1986 | WO |
WO 9215968 | Feb 1992 | WO |
WO9618980 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 9618980 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO9826376 | Jun 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08997680 | Dec 1997 | US |
Child | 09613361 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 08762128 | Dec 1996 | US |
Child | 08997680 | US | |
Parent | 08858738 | May 1997 | US |
Child | 08762128 | US |