The field of the present application pertains to medical devices. More particularly, the field of the invention pertains to an apparatus, system, and method for laser assisted cataract surgery.
A “cataract” is a clouding of the lens in the eye that affects vision. Most people develop cataracts due to aging. The condition is not uncommon; it is estimated more than half of all Americans will either have a cataract or have had cataract surgery by age 80.
As shown in
The lens 105 contains protein that is precisely arranged to keep the lens 105 clear and allow light to pass through it. As the eye ages, the protein in the lens 105 may clump together to form a “cataract”. Over time, the cataract may grow larger and obscure a larger portion of the lens 105, making it harder for one to see.
Age-related cataracts affect vision in two ways. The clumps of protein forming the cataract may reduce the sharpness of the image reaching the retina 107. The clouding may become severe enough to cause blurred vision. The lens 105 may slowly change to a yellowish/brownish tint. As the lens 105 ages, objects that once appeared clear may gradually appear to have a brownish tint. While the amount of tinting may be small at first, increased tinting over time may make it more difficult to read and perform other routine activities.
Surgery is currently the only real treatment for cataracts. Each year, ophthalmologists in the United States perform over three million cataract surgeries. The vast majority of cataracts are removed using a procedure called extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE). ECCE traditionally comprises of several steps. Incisions must first be made to the cornea 101 in order to introduce surgical instruments into the anterior chamber 102. Through the incisions in the cornea 101 and the space of the anterior chamber 102, the surgeon may remove the anterior face of the lens capsule 109 in order to access the lens underneath 105. This phase of the surgery, known as capsulorhexis, is often the most difficult procedure in ECCE.
Having gained access to the lens through capsulorhexis, a small amount of fluid may be injected into the exposed lens capsule 104 to improve access and maneuverability of the lens 105. This phase of the surgery is known as hydrodissection to the skilled artisan.
After loosening the lens, it must be extracted. Traditionally, the lens is manually extracted through a large (usually 10-12 mm) incision made in the cornea 101 or sclera 108. Modern ECCE is usually performed using a micro surgical technique called phacoemulsification, whereby the cataract is emulsified with an ultrasonic handpiece and then suctioned out of the eye through incisions in the cornea 101.
A phacoemulsification tool may be an ultrasonic handpiece with a titanium or steel needle. The tip of the needle may vibrate at an ultrasonic frequency to sculpt and emulsify the cataract while a pump aspirates particles through the tip. In some circumstances, a second fine steel instrument called a “chopper” may be used to access the cataract from a side port to help with “chopping” the nucleus 111 into smaller pieces. Once broken into numerous pieces, each piece of the cataract is emulsified and aspirated out of the eye 100 with suction.
As the nucleus 111 often contains the hardest portion of the cataract, emulsification of the nucleus 111 makes it easier to aspirate the particles. In contrast, the softer outer material from the lens cortex 112 may be removed using only aspiration. After removing the lens material from the eye 100, an intraocular lens implant (IOL) may be placed into the remaining lens capsule 104 to complete the procedure.
One variation on phacoemulsification is sculpting and emulsifying the lens 105 using lasers rather than ultrasonic energy. In particular, femtosecond laser-based cataract surgery is rapidly emerging as a potential technology that allows for improved cornea incision formation and fragmentation of the cataract.
Phacoemulsification and laser-based emulsification, however, still have their shortcomings. Phacoemulsification requires the use of tools that propagate ultrasound energy along the length of the tool, from a proximal transducer to a distal tip. The propagation leads to the transmission of ultrasound energy along the tool to other tissues proximal to the eye 100. Ultrasound tools also generate more heat than would be desirable for a procedure in the eye 100. In addition, the mechanical requirements of propagating the ultrasound wave along the length of the tool often make it rigid and difficult to steer around corners or bends.
Laser-based tools have their own drawbacks. Presently, manually controlled lasers require careful, precise movement since they can easily generate unwanted heat in the eye 100. Laser fibers in the tool are also fragile, and thus easily damaged when attempting to navigate tight corners. Both limitations increase surgery time and raise safety concerns.
An alternative to conventional laser systems, femtosecond laser systems have their advantages and drawbacks as well. Femtosecond laser systems may be used to create entry sites through the cornea 101 and sclera 108 into the eye 100, as well as to remove the anterior face of the capsule 104. Femtosecond laser energy may be focused within the lens nucleus 111 itself, and used to “pre-chop” the lens nucleus 111 into a number of pieces that can then be easily removed with aspiration. Femtosecond lasers, however, can only fragment the central portion of the lens 105 because the iris 103 blocks the peripheral portion of the lens 105. Thus, use of another emulsification technology—ultrasound or conventional laser—is still necessary to fracture and remove the peripheral portion of the cataract in lens 105, extending total procedure time. Furthermore, femtosecond laser systems are also expensive and costly to operate and maintain.
As an alternative to a purely laser-based emulsification, certain systems may use the lasers to generate steam bubbles to create shockwaves to break up the cataract material during emulsification.
In both
Therefore, it would be beneficial to have a new method, apparatus, and system for using steam bubbles that are not collinear with the neutral axis of the optical fiber.
In general, the present invention provides a device and method for laser assisted cataract surgery using laser energy emitted by optical fibers to create steam bubbles. In one aspect, the present invention provides for a surgical device comprising an optical fiber having a proximal end and distal end, wherein the optical fiber is configured to generate a steam bubble from light energy conveyed out the distal end of the fiber, the proximal end is operatively connected to a light source, and the distal end comprises a tip with a non-orthogonal tilted edge across the diameter of the fiber.
A related device further comprises a tube that encloses the optical fiber. In some embodiments, the tube is pre-bent at a predetermined angle. In some embodiments, an angle of the tilted edge exceeds 45 degrees. In some embodiments, an angle of the tilted edge does not exceed 45 degrees. In some embodiments, the angle of the tilted edge exceeds 7 degrees but not 45 degrees. In some embodiments, the optical fiber is further configured to generate a second steam bubble from the application of laser energy.
In another aspect, the present invention provides for a method that comprises transmitting light energy through an optical fiber, generating a steam bubble; and directing the steam bubble to an operative region of a patient, wherein the optical fiber has a proximal end and a distal end, the optical fiber being configured to generate the steam bubble from light energy conveyed out the distal end of the fiber, the proximal end being operatively connected to a light source, and the distal end comprising a tip with a non-orthogonal tilted edge across the diameter of the fiber.
In related embodiments, the optical fiber is enclosed within a tube. In some embodiments, the tube is pre-bent at a predetermined angle. In some embodiments, the method further comprises axially rotating the tube to generate a circular cutting path for the steam bubble. In some embodiments, axially rotating the optical fiber to generate a circular cutting path for the steam bubble. In some embodiments, an angle of the tilted edge exceeds 45 degrees. In some embodiments, an angle of the tilted edge does not exceed 45 degrees. In some embodiments, the angle of the tilted edge exceeds 7 degrees but not 45 degrees.
The invention will be described, by way of example, and with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings, in which:
Although certain preferred embodiments and examples are disclosed below, inventive subject matter extends beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments to other alternative embodiments and/or uses, and to modifications and equivalents thereof. Thus, the scope of the claims appended hereto is not limited by any of the particular embodiments described below. For example, in any method or process disclosed herein, the acts or operations of the method or process may be performed in any suitable sequence and are not necessarily limited to any particular disclosed sequence. Various operations may be described as multiple discrete operations in turn, in a manner that may be helpful in understanding certain embodiments; however, the order of description should not be construed to imply that these operations are order dependent. Additionally, the structures, systems, and/or devices described herein may be embodied as integrated components or as separate components.
As is known in the art, the conveyance of light energy at an interface of two materials is affected by the angle of incidence of the light energy, the index of refraction of the two substances, and the critical angle of the interface. When light is travelling from a high index of refraction material to a low index of refraction material and the angle of incidence is below the critical angle, the light largely passes from the high index of refraction to a low index of refraction material. When light is travelling from a high index of refraction material to a low index of refraction material and the angle of incidence is above the critical angle, the light reflects off the interface. If some of the light is greater than the critical angle, the light will exit the fiber from the side of the fiber. If all of the light in the fiber hits the titled end at greater than the critical angle, then all of the light will exit the side of the fiber.
Higher index materials have correspondingly smaller critical angles. For example, for light coming from fused silica into air, the critical angle is 44.6 degrees. In contrast, the critical angle in water is lower.
In some applications including the cutting of membranes, it is desirable to have the steam bubble perpendicular to the surface of the membrane. Thus, in some embodiments, the ability to add steam bubble deflection to the fiber can allow for sharper bends of the steam bubble relative to the membrane surface since fibers have a finite bending radius.
In contrast to
The preferred embodiments generally use laser light with a short absorption depth in water, i.e., an absorption depth less than 20 μm, which requires a corresponding absorption coefficient greater than 500 cm−1. Accordingly, the preferred embodiments make use of light energy with either (i) a wavelength shorter than 200 nm or (ii) a wavelength longer than 2.8 μm. Among the options with wavelengths longer than 2.8 μm, light with wavelengths of 3 μm, 4.5 μm, 6 μm and 10 μm may be especially effective in certain embodiments. In particular, light with a wavelength of 3 μm may be advantageous because its absorption depth is very short and appropriate optical fibers are inexpensive. In contrast, optical fibers capable of conveying light energy of 4.5 μm, 6 μm, and 10 μm wavelength are more costly.
The preferred embodiments also make use of pulsed light energy. In some embodiments, the pulse width may be as long as 500 μs. Enhanced performance has been observed in embodiments that make use of pulse widths of 80 μs in length and shorter. Some embodiments make use of light energy with a pulse width of 60 μs.
The advantages of having a deflected steam bubble include (i) being able to reach locations that the tip of the optical fiber cannot reach, (ii) being able to deflect by rotation the fiber, (iii) being able to use the defection angle to add to mechanical bends of the optical fiber, and (iv) improving the surgeon's line of sight of the operative region and cutting process.
In
In
With a tilt angle 704 of 35 degrees, the tip of steam bubble 705 extends out well beyond the diameter of the fiber 701. The deflection angle 706 allows the surgeon to cut the surface of the lens capsule while also keeping the fiber 701 parallel to the surface of the lens capsule, improving visibility of the operative region. This helps a surgeon see the location of the fiber tip 703 while cutting material below the fiber tip 703.
In
In some embodiments, the size of the resulting steam bubbles may be altered by changing the input angle of the laser energy into the fiber. If the laser light is input into the fiber with a small divergence from the neutral axis of the fiber, laser light will tend to exit the end of the fiber. If the laser light is input into the fiber with a small divergence at an angle with respect the axis of the fiber, the light will tend to exit the side of the fiber.
The bending of the fiber can be achieved by numerous methods, such as pre-bent glass fibers and fibers bent in an outer tube. In some embodiments, bend fibers may be dynamically controlled. In certain embodiments, those bend fibers may be dynamically bent in a robotically controlled tube mechanism. In other embodiments, the fibers may be bent by a robotically controlled flexure mechanism.
The present invention is not limited to embodiments using the aforementioned systems and the associated instrument drive mechanisms. One skilled in the art would appreciate modifications to facilitate coupling to different robotic arm configurations.
For purposes of comparing various embodiments, certain aspects and advantages of these embodiments are described. Not necessarily all such aspects or advantages are achieved by any particular embodiment. Thus, for example, various embodiments may be carried out in a manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other aspects or advantages as may also be taught or suggested herein.
Elements or components shown with any embodiment herein are exemplary for the specific embodiment and may be used on or in combination with other embodiments disclosed herein. While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific examples thereof have been shown in the drawings and are herein described in detail. The invention is not limited, however, to the particular forms or methods disclosed, but to the contrary, covers all modifications, equivalents and alternatives thereof.
This application 8 claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/865,454, filed Aug. 13, 2013, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4040413 | Ohshiro | Aug 1977 | A |
4198960 | Utsugi | Apr 1980 | A |
4470407 | Hussein | Sep 1984 | A |
4597388 | Koziol et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4685458 | Leckrone | Aug 1987 | A |
4747405 | Leckrone | May 1988 | A |
4898574 | Uchiyama et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4905673 | Pimiskern | Mar 1990 | A |
4983165 | Loiterman | Jan 1991 | A |
5029574 | Shimamura et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5085659 | Rydell | Feb 1992 | A |
5308323 | Sogawa et al. | May 1994 | A |
5325848 | Adams et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5344395 | Whalen et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353783 | Nakao et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5370609 | Drasler et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5372124 | Takayama et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5411016 | Kume | May 1995 | A |
5425735 | Rosen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431649 | Mulier et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5441485 | Peters | Aug 1995 | A |
5450843 | Moll et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5472406 | De La Torre et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5472426 | Bonati et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5501667 | Verduin, Jr. | Mar 1996 | A |
5520684 | Imran | May 1996 | A |
5562648 | Peterson | Oct 1996 | A |
5562678 | Booker | Oct 1996 | A |
5572999 | Funda et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5613973 | Jackson et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5645083 | Essig et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653374 | Young et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5658311 | Baden | Aug 1997 | A |
5662590 | De La Torre et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5695461 | Schaible | Dec 1997 | A |
5695500 | Taylor et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710870 | Ohm | Jan 1998 | A |
5716325 | Bonutti | Feb 1998 | A |
5788667 | Stoller | Aug 1998 | A |
5810770 | Chin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5924175 | Lippitt | Jul 1999 | A |
5989230 | Frassica | Nov 1999 | A |
6033371 | Tone et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6071281 | Burnside et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6093157 | Chandrasekaran | Jul 2000 | A |
6120476 | Fung et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120498 | Jani et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6156030 | Neev | Dec 2000 | A |
6174318 | Bates et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6183435 | Bumbalough et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6326616 | Andrien et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6398792 | O'Connor | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405078 | Moaddeb et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6406486 | De La Torre et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6436107 | Wang et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6440061 | Wenner et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6508823 | Gonon | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522906 | Salisbury et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6554793 | Pauker et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577891 | Jaross et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6638246 | Naimark et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6671581 | Niemeyer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6676668 | Mercereau et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6706050 | Giannadakis | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6736784 | Menne et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6763259 | Hauger et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7087061 | Chernenko et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7282055 | Tsuruta | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7344528 | Tu et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7351193 | Forman et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7559934 | Teague et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7725214 | Diolaiti | May 2010 | B2 |
7883475 | Dupont et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7963911 | Turliuc | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7967799 | Boukhny | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8038598 | Khachi | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8049873 | Hauger et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8092397 | Wallace et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8187173 | Miyoshi | May 2012 | B2 |
8224484 | Swarup et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8257303 | Moll et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8414564 | Goldshleger et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8518024 | Williams et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8523762 | Miyamoto et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8945163 | Voegele et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8956280 | Eversull et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9345456 | Tsonton et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9460536 | Hasegawa et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9504604 | Alvarez | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9561083 | Yu et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9592042 | Titus | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9597152 | Schaeffer | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9622827 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9636184 | Lee et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9713509 | Schuh et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9727963 | Mintz et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737371 | Romo et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9737373 | Schuh | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9744335 | Jiang | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9763741 | Alvarez et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9788910 | Schuh | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9844353 | Walker et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9844412 | Bogusky et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9867635 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2018 | B2 |
10016900 | Meyer et al. | Jul 2018 | B1 |
10022192 | Ummalaneni | Jul 2018 | B1 |
20020019644 | Hastings | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030040681 | Ng et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030109889 | Mercereau | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040030349 | Boukhny | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040135733 | Chou et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143253 | Vanney | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158261 | Vu | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040186349 | Ewers | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210116 | Nakao | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050070844 | Chow et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050159645 | Bertolero | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050261705 | Gist | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060015133 | Grayzel | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060058813 | Teague | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060116693 | Weisenburgh | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060135963 | Kick | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156875 | McRury et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060189891 | Waxman et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229598 | Shadduck | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070016164 | Dudney et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070027534 | Bergheim | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032906 | Sutherland et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070106304 | Hammack | May 2007 | A1 |
20070135763 | Musbach et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135803 | Belson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070213668 | Spitz | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070250111 | Lu | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070299427 | Yeung et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080033467 | Miyamoto et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080065109 | Larkin | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097293 | Chin et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114341 | Thyzel | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125698 | Greg et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080177285 | Brock et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080187101 | Gertner | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080196533 | Bergamasco | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228104 | Uber et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090012507 | Culbertson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036900 | Moll | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090082634 | Kathrani et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090105723 | Dillinger | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090161827 | Gertner et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171271 | Webster et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090248041 | Williams et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248043 | Tierney et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264878 | Carmel et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090268015 | Scott et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270760 | Leimbach et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287188 | Golden et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090312768 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326322 | Diolaiti | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036294 | Mantell et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100073150 | Olson et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100204605 | Blakley | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100204646 | Plicchi et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100217235 | Thorstenson | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110009779 | Romano et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110015483 | Barbagli | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110028887 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110040404 | Diolaiti et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110046441 | Wiltshire et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110071541 | Prisco et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110071543 | Prisco et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106102 | Balicki et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125165 | Simaan et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110160713 | Neuberger | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110213362 | Cunningham | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224660 | Neuberger | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110257641 | Hastings | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110306836 | Ohline et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110313343 | Milutinovic et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120069167 | Liu et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120253277 | Tah et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120138586 | Webster et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172786 | Mackool | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120232342 | Reydel | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120253332 | Moll | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120259320 | Loesel et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120283747 | Popovic | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296318 | Wellhofer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130006144 | Clancy | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130066136 | Palese et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130072787 | Wallace et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130085442 | Shtul et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130085486 | Boutoussov | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130096574 | Kang et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110042 | Humphreys | May 2013 | A1 |
20130116714 | Adams et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130116716 | Bahls et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130144116 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130190796 | Tilson et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130225997 | Dillard et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130253267 | Collins | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130303876 | Gelfand et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310819 | Neuberger | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140012276 | Alvarez | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140039681 | Bowling | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140051985 | Fan | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058404 | Hammack | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058428 | Christopher | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140100445 | Stenzel | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140142591 | Alvarez et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140163318 | Swanstrom | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140194859 | Ianchulev | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140275956 | Fan | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276594 | Tanner et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276723 | Parihar | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140309649 | Alvarez et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140309655 | Gal et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140316203 | Carroux et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140357984 | Wallace et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140364870 | Alvarez et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140379000 | Romo et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150025539 | Alvarez et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150051592 | Kintz | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150101442 | Romo | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119637 | Alvarez et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150119638 | Yu et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150164522 | Budiman | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164594 | Romo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164595 | Bogusky et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150164596 | Romo et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150201917 | Snow | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150202085 | Lemonis | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150314110 | Park | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150335480 | Alvarez et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160001038 | Romo et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160022289 | Wan | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160030073 | Lsakov | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160045208 | Ciulla | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160066935 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160158490 | Leeflang | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160183841 | Duindam et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160199984 | Lohmeier et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160235495 | Wallace et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160249932 | Rogers et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160270865 | Landey et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160279394 | Moll et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160287279 | Bovay et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160296294 | Moll et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160331358 | Gordon | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160367324 | Sato et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160374541 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170007337 | Dan | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170049471 | Gaffney et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170065227 | Marrs | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170065364 | Schuh et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170065365 | Schuh | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170095234 | Prisco et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170100199 | Yu et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170119411 | Shah | May 2017 | A1 |
20170119412 | Noonan et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170119413 | Romo | May 2017 | A1 |
20170119481 | Romo et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170165011 | Bovay et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170172673 | Yu et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170202627 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170209073 | Sramek et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170290631 | Lee et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170319289 | Neff et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170333679 | Jiang | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170340396 | Romo et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170365055 | Mintz et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170367782 | Schuh et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180025666 | Ho et al. | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180055583 | Schuh et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180177383 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180177556 | Noonan et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180177561 | Mintz et al. | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180214011 | Graetzel et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221038 | Noonan et al. | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180221039 | Shah | Aug 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
H09224951 | Sep 1997 | JP |
WO 9214411 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO 03096871 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004105849 | Dec 2004 | WO |
WO 2011161218 | Dec 2011 | WO |
WO 13107468 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO 13130895 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 17114655 | Jul 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 14/578,082, filed Dec. 19, 2014, Alvarez et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/583,021, filed Dec. 24, 2014, Romo et al. |
International search report and written opinion dated Jan. 27, 2015 for PCT Application No. US2014/062284. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/196,953, filed Mar. 4, 2014, Alvarez et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/201,610, filed Mar. 7, 2014, Romo. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/301,871, filed Jun. 11, 2014, Alvarez et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/479,095, filed Sep. 5, 2014, Romo et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/523,760, filed Oct. 24, 2014, Alvarez et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/037,520, filed Aug. 14, 2014, Yu. |
Balicki, et al. Single fiber optical coherence tomography microsurgical instruments for computer and robot-assisted retinal surgery. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. MICCAI 2009. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. 108-115. |
Effect of microsecond pulse length and tip shape on explosive bubble formation of 2.78 iLtm Er,Cr;YSGG and 2.94 iLtm Er:YAG laser. Paper 8221-12, Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 8221 (Monday Jan. 23, 2013). |
Ehlers, et al. Integration of a spectral domain optical coherence tomography system into a surgical microscope for intraoperative imaging. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 52.6. 2011; 3153-3159. |
Hubschman. Robotic Eye Surgery: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Computer Science and Systems Biology. 2012. |
International search report and written opinion dated Mar. 29, 2013 for PCT/US2012/069540. |
International search report and written opinion dated Nov. 7, 2014 for PCT Application No. US2014/041990. |
International search report dated Jun. 16, 2014 for PCT/US2014/022424. |
Office action dated Jun. 19, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/868,769. |
Stoyanov. Surgical vision. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 40.2. 2012; 332-345. Published Oct. 20, 2011. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,373, filed Nov. 14, 2014, Romo et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,387, filed Nov. 14, 2014, Bogusky et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,403, filed Nov. 14, 2014, Yu et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/542,429, filed Nov. 14, 2014, Romo et al. |
Office action dated Oct. 7, 2014 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/711,440. |
European search report and search opinion dated Jul. 2, 2015 for EP Application No. 12856685.8. |
Office action dated May 21, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 13/711,440. |
Office action dated Jun. 11, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/158,548. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150051592 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61865454 | Aug 2013 | US |