The technical field of the disclosure relates to voltage regulators and, more particularly, to low dropout (LDO) regulators.
An LDO regulator is a direct current (DC) linear voltage regulator that can operate with a very low dropout, where “dropout” (also termed “dropout voltage”) means the difference between the input voltage (e.g., received power supply rail voltage) and the regulated out voltage. As known in the conventional voltage regulator arts, low dropout voltage may provide, for example, higher efficiency and concomitant reduction in heat generation, and may provide for lower minimum operating voltage.
The following summary is not an extensive overview of all contemplated aspects. Its sole purpose is to present some concepts of one or more aspects in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
One exemplary embodiment provides a transient response accelerated low dropout (LDO) regulator, which may include an error amplifier having a feedback input, an error output, and a reference input configured to receive a reference voltage, a pass gate having a control gate coupled to the error output, an input configured to receive a supply voltage, and a pass gate output, wherein the pass gate output is coupled to the feedback input, and a transient response accelerator (TRA) circuit coupled to the pass gate output and configured to apply, in response to a voltage drop on the pass gate output, a TRA boost to the control gate.
In an aspect, the TRA circuit may be configured to apply the TRA boost at a magnitude dependent, at least in part, on a rate of the voltage drop.
In accordance with one or more exemplary embodiments, one example TRA circuit may include a pass gate kick transistor having a drain coupled to the control gate of the pass gate, and having a gate, a voltage change triggered control circuit having an input coupled by a coupling capacitor to the pass gate output and having a kick output that is coupled to the gate of the pass gate kick transistor. In aspect, the voltage change triggered control circuit can be configured to apply through the kick output, in response to a voltage drop on the pass gate output, a boost voltage to the gate of the pass gate kick transistor, at a magnitude corresponding to a rate of the voltage drop. In a related aspect, the pass gate kick transistor may be configured to pull a voltage on the control gate of the pass gate, in response to the boost voltage, by a magnitude based, at least in part, on the boost voltage.
In an aspect, one example voltage change triggered control circuit may be further configured to output, in response to a voltage increase on the pass gate output, a boost disable voltage to the gate of the pass gate kick transistor, and the pass gate kick transistor may be configured to switch OFF in response to the boost disable voltage.
In a further aspect, one example voltage change triggered control circuit can include an inverter amplifier having an inverter input coupled by a coupling capacitor to the input of the voltage change triggered control circuit, and having an inverter output coupled to the kick output, an inverter bias feedback resistor coupled between the inverter input and the inverter output, and an inverter bias current source feeding a current to the inverter input.
In an aspect, one example pass gate kick transistor may have a given threshold voltage (VTH), and the current that is fed by the inverter bias current source can be a pass gate kick transistor bias control current having a magnitude that sets, at the kick output, a static bias voltage within a range from slightly less than VTH to approximately equal to VTH.
In an aspect, one example inverter amplifier may include a complementary metal oxide (CMOS) inverter circuit, and the inverter bias feedback resistor may be a Class A bias resistor having a resistance that maintains the complementary metal oxide (CMOS) inverter circuit in a Class A mode of operation.
In another aspect, one example voltage change triggered control circuit may include an NMOS transistor having a gate coupled to the input of the voltage change triggered control circuit, a drain coupled to the kick output and a biasing network coupled to the gate, configured to bias the NMOS transistor as a Class A amplifier.
In another aspect, one example voltage change triggered control circuit may include an NMOS transistor having a drain coupled to the kick output, a gate coupled to the input of the voltage change triggered control circuit, and a source configured for coupling to a reference rail, and may include a bias control resistor having one end coupled to the drain of the NMOS transistor; a PMOS transistor having a drain coupled to another end of the bias control resistor, a gate coupled to the gate of the NMOS transistor, and a source configured for coupling to a Vdd power rail, and may further include a self-bias resistor coupling the drain of the NMOS transistor to the source of the NMOS transistor.
In an aspect, one example voltage change triggered control circuit can include a bias current source having an input configured for coupling to a power rail and having an output, a bias control resistor coupled at one end to the output of the bias current source, an NMOS transistor having a drain coupled to another end of the bias control resistor and to the output of the voltage change triggered control circuit, a gate coupled to the input of the voltage change triggered control circuit, and a source configured for coupling to a reference rail; and a self-bias resistor coupling the drain of the NMOS transistor to the source of the NMOS transistor. In one further aspect, the bias current source can feed a bias current through the bias control resistor and the NMOS transistor.
One or more exemplary embodiments may provide a method for providing a transient response accelerated low dropout (LDO) voltage regulation, and operations may include controlling a resistance of a pass gate based on a regulator output voltage at an output of the pass gate output and a reference voltage; and in response to a drop in the regulator output voltage, overriding the controlling and forcing the pass gate to a reduced resistance value.
One or more exemplary embodiments may provide an apparatus for transient response accelerated low dropout (LDO) voltage regulation, and may include means for controlling a resistance of a pass gate based on a regulator output voltage at an output of the pass gate output and a reference voltage; and means for overriding, in response to a drop in the regulator output voltage, the controlling a resistance and forcing the pass gate to a reduced resistance value.
The accompanying drawings found in the attachments are presented to aid in the description of embodiments of the invention and are provided solely for illustration of the embodiments and not limitation thereof.
Aspects of the invention are disclosed in the following description and related drawings directed to specific embodiments of the invention. Alternate embodiments may be devised without departing from the scope of the invention. Additionally, well-known elements of the invention will not be described in detail or will be omitted so as not to obscure the relevant details of the invention.
The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments. Likewise, the term “embodiments of the invention” does not require that all embodiments of the invention include the discussed feature, advantage or mode of operation.
The terminology used herein is only for the purpose of describing particular examples according to embodiments, and is not intended to be limiting of embodiments of the invention. As used herein, the singular forms “a”, “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. As used herein the terms “comprises”, “comprising,”, “includes” and/or “including” specify the presence of stated structural and functional features, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other structural and functional feature, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
Those of skill in the art will appreciate that information and signals may be represented using any of a variety of different technologies and techniques. For example, data, instructions, commands, information, signals, bits, symbols, and chips that may be referenced throughout the above description may be represented by voltages, currents, electromagnetic waves, magnetic fields or particles, optical fields, electron spins particles, electrospins, or any combination thereof.
The term “topology” as used herein refers to interconnections of circuit components and, unless stated otherwise, indicates nothing of physical layout of the components or their physical locations relative to one another. Figures described or otherwise identified as showing a topology are no more than a graphical representation of the topology and do not necessarily describe anything regarding physical layout or relative locations of components.
The term “conducting path” as used herein in the context of describing a specific current flow between first and second nodes, or between an “input” and an “output,” or between a “node A” and “a node “B”) is a collective reference to all structure(s) through which the specific current flows in going from A to B. For example, in the context of describing current flow between a source and a drain of a given FET, the conducting path is the body of the FET.
The term “parallel,” as used herein in describing two or more conducting paths being “parallel” to one another, means that the respective voltage drop across the two or more parallel conducting paths is the same, identical, voltage.
The term “series,” as used herein in describing two or more devices or conducting paths being in “series” with one another, means the same, identical current flows through each of the two or more devices or conducting paths.
Continuing to refer to
A mirror current leg (shown but not separately labeled) formed of PMOS transistor M7 (hereinafter referenced as “M7”) in series with NMOS transistor M3 (hereinafter referenced as “M3”) establishes a current mirroring the current through the reference leg. Similarly, a mirror current leg (shown by not separately labeled), formed of PMOS transistor M8 (hereinafter referenced as “M8”) in series with NMOS transistor M10 (hereinafter referenced as “M10”), establishes a current mirroring the current through the regulator control leg. It will be understood by persons of ordinary skill having view of this disclosure that M8 and M7 may be structured relative to M6 and M5, respectively, such that the described currents through M3 and M7 and through M8 and M10 are, respectively, proportional mirrors of the currents through the reference leg and the regulator control leg.
As previously described. Vout is coupled to the gate of M2 by the feedback path 108. Assuming M2 and M4 have the same current-voltage characteristics, the feedback operation forces Vhg, and therefore the resistance of the pass gate 102, to a level where Vout is approximately Vref. In other words, the steady state Vout is the M2 gate voltage, namely Vref at which the current through the regulator control leg is substantially the same as the current through the reference leg, i.e., one half of I1. The signal at the drain of M8 may be employed as a pass gate control signal that may be transmitted, for example, on a pass gate control line 110, to a pass gate control input (shown but not separately numbered) of the pass gate 102.
However, if an additional load is suddenly placed on the Vout terminal of the pass gate 102, loop delay in adjusting Vhg may result in a corresponding sudden drop in Vout. The time history of Vout settling back to Vref is dependent on specific loop characteristics, including the stability, provided by the particular structure of the fast transient response LDO regulator 100. Techniques for determining loop characteristics, including stability, are known to persons of ordinary skill in the art and, therefore, further detailed description is omitted.
In an aspect, the fast transient response LDO regulator 100 may include a Miller R-C feedback compensation network (shown but not separately labeled) formed, in the
Continuing to refer to
Referring to
One exemplary embodiment may provide one or more alternative means and methods for fast transient response LDO regulators that further provide, among other features, significant improvements in transient response, including speed and stability, simplicity of structure, and stability with respect to component drift, without compromise in stability of the LDO regulator.
In accordance with one or more exemplary embodiments, the TRA_LDO 300 further includes transient response accelerator (TRA) circuit 350, having an input 350_IN coupled to the Vout terminal, and an output 350_OP that may be coupled to the Vhg node, i.e., to the control gate (shown but not separately numbered) of the pass gate 304. As will be described in greater detail later, operations of the TRA circuit 350 according to various exemplary embodiments sink, or pull a boost current IBG from the Vhg node, into the 350_OP terminal of the TRA circuit 350, in response to a sudden drop in Vout. As will also be described in greater detail, the magnitude of IBG may correspond to, e.g., may be proportional to the rate of the drop in Vout, at least over a given range. In accordance with an aspect, pulling of the boost current IBG can effectuate a rapid boost in the voltage on the Vhg node, i.e., the control gate of the pass gate 304, without the delay of the feedback-control of the error amplifier 302. The rapid boost in voltage will be alternatively referenced as a “TRA boost voltage” or “TRA_BV” (not labeled on
For brevity, the boost current IBG pulled by the TRA circuit will be alternatively referred to as the “generated” boost current IBG, and the function or act of the TRA circuit 350 pulling the boost current IBG will be alternatively referred to as the TRA circuit 350 “generating” the boost current IBG.
As identified above, the TRA circuit 350 can generate boost current IBG at a magnitude based on, or dependent on a rate of the drop in Vout. In an aspect, the magnitude of IBG can be related to the rate, i.e., to dVout/dt, by a value “K” that can represent a gain of the TRA circuit 350. In an aspect, K, the gain of the TRA circuit 350 may be selected in view of a potential impact to instability, e.g., susceptibility to oscillation, if K is too large. In a further aspect, a structure of the TRA circuit 350 may limit the magnitude of IBG. Stated differently, according to this aspect, for a Vout droop having a slew rate dVout/dt, the TRA circuit 350 may generate IBG at a magnitude proportional (e.g., K) to dVout/dt up to a maximum of that slew rate, referenced herein as “MAX,” at which the TRA circuit 350 saturates. The maximum Imag(IBG) may be referenced as I_MAX, and can be the saturation current of the TRA circuit 350. Imag(IBG) may remain at I_MAX for as long as dVout/dt of the voltage drop is above MAX.
Generation of IBG as described above can be represented, or approximated as
In an aspect, the TRA circuit 350 may be configured such that the maximum IBG, I_MAX, pulls the node Vhg to a hard ON voltage of the pass gate 304.
As described in the sections above, the boost current IBG pulls the Vhg to a voltage that depends, at least in part, on Imag(IBG). In other words, the TRA circuit 350 applies a TRA boost voltage, labeled TRA_BV, to the Vhg node. Therefore, TRA_BV may also be represented as a function of dVout/dt, as
where “M” is a scalar that corresponds, or approximately corresponds, IBG to TRA_BV. “V_MAX” is TRA_BV when the Vout is slewing above the rate MAX. As previously described “TRA boost voltage” means in a direction that increases the conductivity of the pass gate 304. Therefore, referring to Equation (2), since the pass gate 304 is a PMOS device the voltage on the Vhg node that may result from TRA_BV is TRA_BV, i.e., the right side of Equation (2), subtracted from Vdd.
It will be appreciated that the above-described generation of IBG, or TRA_BV, can provide, among various other features and benefits, rapid recovery and correction of Vout, without introduction of stability issues as may result from conventional techniques directed to increasing rates of transient response.
Continuing to refer to
In an aspect, the pass gate kick controller 410 may be configured to output, at 410_OUT, a pass gate boost voltage V_BT that is proportional to dVout/dt, at least over a given range of dVout/dt. The V_BT voltage is applied to the gate of the pass gate kick transistor 450 which response by generating a boost current IBG, i.e., pulling the boost current IBG from the Vhg node. In an aspect, the magnitude of IBG is proportional to V_BT up to a maximum of V_BT, at which point the pass gate kick transistor 450 may saturate. The pulling of the boost current IBG from the Vhg node directly pulls down the Vhg voltage.
Therefore, in accordance with various exemplary embodiments, the combination of the pass gate kick controller 410 and the pass gate kick transistor 450, in response to dVout/dt, may rapidly pull the Vhg voltage down. In other words, the combination of the pass gate kick controller 410 and the pass gate kick transistor 450 may apply, in response to dVout/dt, a pass gate boost voltage, TRA_BV that rapidly lowers or decreases the resistance of the pass gate 304. In accordance with Equations (1) and (2), the amount by which the resistance of the pass gate 304 is lowered us proportional to dVout/dt, up to a maximum at which the pass gate kick transistor 450 may saturate. The rapid reduction in the resistance of the pass gate 304 can provide, in turn, a current boost from the output of the pass gate 304 output. The current boost is straight from the Vdd rail, with no delay from the regular LDO feedback loop.
In an aspect, the pass gate kick controller 410 of
Referring to
With continuing reference to
Description in preceding sections has referred to generating, i.e., pulling a current IBG from the Vhg node in response to a sharp or rapid drop in Vout, i.e., a negative dVout/dt. Referring to
For some applications, a reduction or at least a further control of a quiescent current through the pass gate kick transistor 450 may be desired. Various exemplary embodiments that may provide such reduction and/or control of the quiescent current through the pass gate kick transistor 450 will be described in greater detail in reference to
Referring to
Continuing to refer to
The pass gate kick controller 610 may include PMOS transistor 612 (referenced alternatively as “transistor 612”) and the NMOS transistor 614 (referenced alternatively as “transistor 614”), with self-bias resistor 616 coupling the drain of the transistor 612 to the gate of the transistor 612 and the gate of the transistor 614. Bias control resistor 618 couples the drain of the transistor 612 to the drain of the transistor 614. As will be described in greater detail later, in an aspect, a resistance value of the bias control resistor 618 can be selected to establish a given static bias voltage, BIAS2, on the kick output 410_OUT. The given static bias voltage, in turn, can be selected, or determined based on a given acceptable quiescent current I_QR.
Referring to
The resistance value of bias control resistor 618 may be selected to effect a voltage drop that subtracts from the gate-to-source voltage of the transistor 614, to select a BIAS2 voltage at the drain of the transistor 614. For example, as will be appreciated by persons of ordinary skill having view of this disclosure, the voltage on the gate of the NMOS transistor 614 is (assuming negligible voltage drop across the self-bias resistor 616), approximately the same as the voltage at the junction arbitrarily labeled “JP.” Assuming the resistance of the bias control transistor 618 is non-zero, current flow through the PMOS transistor 612 and NMOS transistor 614 will cause a voltage drop across the bias control resistor 618. Therefore, the voltage on the kick output 410_OUT, i.e., the ate of the pass gate kick transistor 450 will be lower, by the voltage drop across the bias control transistor 618, than the voltage on the gate of the NMOS transistor 614. The gate-to-source voltage of the pass gate kick transistor 450, likewise, will be lower than the gate-to-source voltage of the NMOS transistor 614.
Referring to
Referring still to
It will be understood that embodiments contemplate a configuration with a zero-resistance bias control resistor 618, e.g., a metal trace (not specifically shown). In such a configuration, (assuming the NMOS transistor 614 and the pass gate kick transistor 450 have the same type and geometry), the quiescent current I_QR will be approximately the same as IB_3.
Referring back to
As can be appreciated, TRA equipped LDO's in accordance with various exemplary embodiments may provide, among other features and benefits, improved droop performance to fast attack edges of load current. TRA enhanced LDO's in accordance with various exemplary embodiments may further provide, among other features and benefits, improved phase margins over a wider load current range, and improved droop performance in paralleled LDO systems due to better transient current sharing.
In
The foregoing disclosed devices and functionalities (such as the devices of
The methods, sequences and/or algorithms described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such that the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor.
Accordingly, an embodiment of the invention can include a computer readable media embodying a method for implementation. Accordingly, the invention is not limited to illustrated examples and any means for performing the functionality described herein are included in embodiments of the invention.
The foregoing disclosed devices and functionalities may be designed and configured into computer files (e.g., RTL, GDSII, GERBER, etc.) stored on computer readable media. Some or all such files may be provided to fabrication handlers who fabricate devices based on such files. Resulting products include semiconductor wafers that are then cut into semiconductor die and packaged into a semiconductor chip. The chips are then employed in devices described above.
While the foregoing disclosure shows illustrative embodiments of the invention, it should be noted that various changes and modifications could be made herein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims. The functions, steps and/or actions of the method claims in accordance with the embodiments of the invention described herein need not be performed in any particular order. Furthermore, although elements of the invention may be described or claimed in the singular, the plural is contemplated unless limitation to the singular is explicitly stated.
The present Application for Patent claims priority to Provisional Application No. 61/720,423 entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR LDO AND DISTRIBUTED LDO TRANSIENT RESPONSE ACCELERATOR” filed Oct. 31, 2012, and assigned to the assignee hereof and hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4656647 | Hotine | Apr 1987 | A |
5696465 | Ishizuka | Dec 1997 | A |
5982226 | Rincon-Mora | Nov 1999 | A |
6031417 | Bechman | Feb 2000 | A |
6046577 | Rincon-Mora et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6184744 | Morishita | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188211 | Rincon-Mora et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6188212 | Larson et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6246221 | Xi | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6333623 | Heisley et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6373233 | Bakker et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6518737 | Stanescu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522111 | Zadeh et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6617833 | Xi | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6703815 | Biagi | Mar 2004 | B2 |
7091710 | Yang et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7142022 | Kang et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7215103 | Wong et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7224156 | Chen | May 2007 | B2 |
7339416 | Rincon-Mora et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7612547 | Renous | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7728569 | Le et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7768351 | Ivanov et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8044653 | Maige et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8072196 | Li | Dec 2011 | B1 |
8080983 | Lourens et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8169203 | Vemula | May 2012 | B1 |
8242761 | Napravnik | Aug 2012 | B2 |
20050231180 | Nagata et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060055383 | Eberlein | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060232327 | Takagi et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20080061881 | Takagi | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080224680 | Suzuki | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090066306 | Noda | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090072984 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100013449 | Miki | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100156364 | Cho et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110241769 | Jung | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120161734 | Wu | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120176107 | Shrivas et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120212199 | Amer et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120229202 | Nikolov et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140117958 | Price et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140125300 | Price et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140139197 | Price et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102117089 | Jul 2011 | CN |
1635239 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2082680 | Jul 2009 | EP |
2001137182 | May 2001 | JP |
2005205072 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2006230680 | Sep 2006 | JP |
2007280025 | Oct 2007 | JP |
20090028282 | Mar 2009 | KR |
2012104673 | Aug 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Cristea I., et al., “Supply Concept in Input Powered Two Channel Switch”, Semiconductor Conference (CAS), 2010 International, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Oct. 11, 2010, pp. 469-472, XP031812172, ISBN: 978-1-4244-5783-0. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2013/067213—ISA/EPO—Mar. 6, 2014. |
Kim Y.I., et al., “Fast Transient Capacitor-Less LDO Regulator Using Low-Power Output Voltage Detector”, Electronics Letters, IEE Stevenage, vol. 48, No. 3, Feb. 2, 2012, pp. 175-177, XP006040603, ISSN: 0013-5194, DOI: 10.1049/EL.2011. |
Liu X. et al., “Design of off-chip capacitor-free CMOS low-dropout voltage regulator”, Circuits and Systems, 2008. APCCAS 2008. IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA, Nov. 30, 2008, pp. 1316-1319, XP031405243, DOI: 10.1109/APCCAS.2008.4746270 ISBN: 978-1-4244-2341-5. |
Ying O.P., et al., “An Output-Capacities Low-Dropout Regulator with Direct Voltage-Spike Detection”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, USA, vol. 45, No. 2, Feb. 1, 2010, pp. 458-466, XP011301260, ISSN: 0018-9200, DOI: 10.1109/JSSC.2009.2034805. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2013/068522—ISA/EPO—Jun. 30, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140117956 A1 | May 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61720423 | Oct 2012 | US |