Patent Grant
8578734
The present application claims priority from European Patent Application 06113923.4 filed 15 May 2006.
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for liquefying a hydrocarbon stream such as natural gas.
Several methods of liquefying a natural gas stream thereby obtaining liquefied natural gas (LNG) are known. It is desirable to liquefy a natural gas stream for a number of reasons. As an example, natural gas can be stored and transported over long distances more readily as a liquid than in gaseous form because it occupies a smaller volume and does not need to be stored at high pressures.
Usually natural gas, comprising predominantly methane, enters an LNG plant at elevated pressures and is pre-treated to produce a purified feed stock suitable for liquefying at cryogenic temperatures. The purified gas is processed through a plurality of cooling stages using heat exchangers to progressively reduce its temperature until liquefaction is achieved. The liquid natural gas is then further cooled (to reduce flashed vapour through one or more expansion stages) to final atmospheric pressure suitable for storage and transportation. The flashed vapour from each expansion stage can be used as a source of plant fuel gas.
The costs in creating and running a liquefying natural gas (LNG) plant or system are naturally high, and much is for the cooling configurations. Thus any reduction in the energy requirements of the plant or system has significant cost benefit. Reducing the cost of the cooling configuration is particularly advantageous.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,541,852 is directed to a base load LNG system, and shows a slip stream of feed natural gas which is reintroduced into the liquefied natural gas stream after the liquefied natural gas stream is reduced in pressure through a valve. This has the problem of not fully utilising available work from the feed natural gas.
It is an object to minimise the above problem, and to improve the efficiency of a liquefying plant or system.
It is a further object of the present invention to simplify the use of vapour from a flash tank, and thereby reduce the energy requirements of a liquefying plant or system.
One or more of the above or other objects can be achieved by the present invention providing a method of liquefying a hydrocarbon stream such as natural gas from a feed stream, the method at least comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a feed stream;
(b) dividing the feed stream of step (a) to provide at least a first feed stream comprising at least 90 mass % of the initial feed stream (10), and a second feed stream;
(c) liquefying the first feed stream of step (b) at a pressure between 20-100 bar to provide a first liquefied natural gas (LNG) stream;
(d) cooling the second feed stream of step (b) through a heat exchanger to provide a cooled feed stream;
(e) combining the first LNG stream of step (c) with the cooled feed stream of step (d) to provide a combined LNG stream;
(f) reducing the pressure of the combined LNG stream of step (e); and
(g) passing the combined LNG stream of step (f) through a flash vessel to provide a product LNG stream and a gaseous stream.
An embodiment of the present invention will now be described by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying non-limiting drawing in which:
An advantage of the present invention is to increase the work energy available, by the reduction of pressure of the combined LNG stream.
Another advantage of the present invention is to reduce the energy requirement of the flash vessel by combining the first LNG stream and cooled feed stream prior to reduction of their pressure and introduction into the flash vessel.
Moreover, hitherto, the cold (energy) of the flashed vapour from the expansion or end flash stages has usually only been recovered in one or more heat exchangers by cooling down a fraction of a refrigerant stream, usually a Light Mixed Refrigerant (LMR) stream in a countercurrent heat exchanger. In this way, the end flash gas is brought from a temperature level of about −160° C. to only about −40° C., such that the full cold of the end flash gas is not recovered. The cooled LMR stream is then used in one or more other heat exchangers to cool another stream in the plant or system.
The hydrocarbon stream may be any suitable gas stream to be treated, but is usually a natural gas stream obtained from natural gas or petroleum reservoirs. As an alternative the natural gas stream may also be obtained from another source, also including a synthetic source such as a Fischer-Tropsch process.
Usually the natural gas stream is comprised substantially of methane. Preferably the feed stream comprises at least 60 mol % methane, more preferably at least 80 mol % methane.
Depending on the source, the natural gas may contain varying amounts of hydrocarbons heavier than methane such as ethane, propane, butanes and pentanes as well as some aromatic hydrocarbons. The natural gas stream may also contain non-hydrocarbons such as H2O, N2, CO2, H2S and other sulphur compounds, and the like.
If desired, the feed stream may be pre-treated before using it in the present invention. This pre-treatment may comprise removal of undesired components such as CO2 and H2S, or other steps such as pre-cooling, pre-pressurizing or the like. As these steps are well known to the person skilled in the art, they are not further discussed here.
The division of the feed stream could be provided by any suitable divider, for example a stream splitter. Preferably the division creates two streams having the same composition and phases.
The flash vessel may be any suitable vessel for obtaining a product LNG stream and a gaseous stream. Such vessels are known in the art.
The person skilled in the art will understand that the step of reducing the pressure may be performed in various ways using any expansion device (e.g. using a flash valve or a common expander) or any combination of same. Preferably, the reduction in pressure is carried out by a two phase expander or expanders.
Although the method according to the present invention is applicable to various hydrocarbon feed streams, it is particularly suitable for natural gas streams to be liquefied. As the skilled person readily understands how to liquefy a hydrocarbon stream, this is not further discussed here.
The liquefaction of the first feed stream is preferably carried out between 40-80 bar. Also preferably, there is no real or significant pressure change (other than any de minimus or normal operational change, for example 10 bar or less) of the first feed stream between its separation and recombination with the second feed stream.
The product LNG stream is preferably at a low pressure such as 1-10 bar, more preferably 1-5 bar, even more preferably ambient pressure. The person skilled in the art will readily understand that after liquefaction, the liquefied natural gas may be further processed, if desired. As an example, the obtained LNG may be depressurized by means of a Joule-Thomson valve or by means of a cryogenic turbo-expander. Also, further intermediate processing steps between the gas/liquid separation in the first gas/liquid separator and the liquefaction may be performed.
In the present invention, the gaseous stream of step (g) could be directly used to provide part, substantial or whole cooling for any part, stream, unit, stage or process of a liquefying plant or system. This could be carried out possibly as one cooling stream or as multiple cooling streams, either in parallel or serially. This could include at least part of the liquefying of the first feed stream, or indeed any feed stream. It could also include cooling a refrigerant. This could be carried out by passing the gaseous stream of step (g) through one or more heat exchangers.
Thus, the gaseous stream from the flash vessel can advantageously provide direct cooling of a feed stream without requiring any intermediate refrigerant processes or streams.
A further advantage of the present invention is that more cold recovery is possible from the gaseous stream, increasing the efficiency of the cold recovery and therefore further reducing the energy requirements of the overall liquefying plant.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the method further comprises the step of;
(h) passing the second feed stream and the gaseous stream through a heat exchanger to at least partly provide the cooling of the second feed stream in step (d).
An advantage of this embodiment is that the second feed stream does not require a separate cooling system or apparatus, reducing the plant installation and energy requirements.
Preferably, the method of the present invention further comprises the step of:
(i) using the outward gaseous stream provided from the passage of the input gaseous stream through the or any heat exchanger as a fuel gas stream.
An advantage of this embodiment is that the gaseous stream is still a useable product in a overall plant, without recycle to the feed stream.
Typically, the second stream is cooled to a temperature sufficient to provide a combined LNG stream upon combining the cooled feed stream with the first LNG stream.
Generally, the second stream is cooled by the heat exchange in step (d) to a temperature of at least −100° C., and preferably the same or similar temperature to that of the first LNG stream.
The division of the feed stream containing the natural gas can be any ratio or ratios between the two or more streams formed by step (b) as long as there is one stream comprising at least 90 mass % of the feed stream. Generally, there are two feed streams created, and the smaller stream could be regarded as a ‘bypass stream’. In one embodiment of the present invention, the first feed stream comprises at least 95 mass %, preferably at least 97 mass %, of the initial feed stream. In the alternative, the second feed stream is between 1-5 mass % of the feed stream containing natural gas, preferably between 2-3 mass % of the feed stream.
Coming from the endflash of the LNG production process, the gaseous stream (which stream may also be termed a reject gas stream) generally has a temperature between −150° C. and −170° C., usually about −160° C. to −162° C. The temperature of the gaseous stream after passing through a heat exchanger will preferably become above 0° C., preferably following any heat exchange with the second feed stream.
Preferably, the gaseous stream is heated to a temperature between 30° C. and 50° C., more preferably between 35° C. and 45° C. by any heat exchange. Where the gaseous stream is used as a fuel gas, its temperature is not critical, such that a temperature of +40° C. is acceptable.
By being able to raise the temperature of the gaseous stream beyond the current −40° C. temperature, which is the maximum cold recovery possible when heat exchanging with current refrigerant streams such as an LMR stream, there are two further benefits. Firstly, the heat exchanger, in particular the cold recovery exchange area, can be smaller, possibly 20% or 30% smaller than the current usual design of heat exchanger for the reject gas from an end flash vessel. Thus, the heat exchange area in a typical heat exchanger could be less than 2500 m2, preferably less than 2000 m2.
Secondly, by being able to increase the resultant temperature of the gaseous stream through a heat exchanger from the present maximum of −40° C. (based on refrigerants used) to a temperature of typically more than +20° C., preferably +30° C., more preferably +40° C. or more, this energy can be used to reduce the energy required for cooling or refrigeration elsewhere in the plant or system, such as the refrigerant compressor power used for one or more other feed streams or LNG streams in the plant. It is estimated that for an LNG plant having a capacity of approximately 5 Mtpa, the cold recovery exchanger duty of the usual heat exchanger for the gaseous stream from the end flash vessel can be doubled, leading to a reduction of the main refrigerant compressor power of 1% or more. A reduction of 1% in the main compression power is significant for industrial liquefaction plants, for example those of 1 Mtpa output or more.
The liquefying in step (c) can involve one or more cooling and/or liquefying stages. This could involve a pre-cooling stage and a main cooling stage. The pre-cooling stage could involve cooling the feed stream against a refrigerant in a refrigerant circuit.
Typically, the main cooling stage has a separate refrigeration circuit, and generally includes one or more separate refrigerant compressors. A non-limiting example of a typical main refrigerant is a mixture of compounds having different boiling points in order to obtain a well-distributed heat transfer. One mixture is nitrogen, ethane and propane.
In a further aspect, the present invention provides apparatus for producing a liquefied hydrocarbon stream such as natural gas from a feed stream, the apparatus at least comprising:
a stream splitter to divide the feed stream into at least a first feed stream comprising at least 90 mass % of the initial feed stream, and a second feed stream;
a liquefying system including at least one heat exchanger for liquefying the first feed stream at a pressure between 20-100 bar to provide a first liquefied natural gas (LNG) stream;
a heat exchanger to at least partly cool the second feed stream to provide a cooled feed stream;
a combiner to combine the first LNG stream and the cooled feed stream;
an expander to reduce the pressure of the combined LNG stream; and
a flash vessel to provide a product LNG stream and a gaseous stream.
Preferably, the gaseous stream from the flash vessel is passed through a conduit to a heat exchanger. After passage through the heat exchanger the gaseous stream could be used as a fuel gas stream.
The combiner may be any suitable arrangement, generally involving a union or junction or piping or conduits, optionally involving one or more valves.
An embodiment of the present invention will now be described by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying non-limiting drawing in which:
The feed stream 10 is divided by stream splitter 16 to divide the feed stream 10 into at least two further feed streams 20, 30 having wholly or substantially the same composition, i.e. the same components and phase or phases. The feed stream (10) can be divided into more than two feed streams where desired or necessary.
In
Meanwhile, the second feed stream 30 created by the stream splitter 16 is passed through another heat exchanger 14. Heat exchangers are well known in the art, and generally involve the passage of at least two streams therethrough, wherein cold energy from one stream is recovered to cool and/or refrigerate at least one other stream running cocurrently or countercurrently to the first stream. In
The heat exchanger 14 could comprise more than one heat exchanger to cool the second feed stream 30. Cooling of the second feed stream 30 may also be assisted by one or more other heat exchangers or coolers or refrigerants (not shown in
The cooled feed stream 50 is combined with the first LNG stream 40 at a combiner such as a junction or driver to produce a combined LNG stream 60. The combined stream 60 is then reduced in pressure by passage through an expander 22, preferably a two phase expander. Expanders are well known in the art and are adapted to reduce the pressure of a fluid stream passing therethrough so as to create a liquid stream and gaseous or vapour stream therefrom. The streams 60a from the expander 22 can pass through a flash valve (not shown) and then on to an end flash vessel 12, wherein the liquid stream is generally recovered as a product LNG stream 70, and a gaseous stream 80. The product LNG stream 70, having a pressure between 1-10 bar, such as ambient pressure, is then passed by one or more pumps to storage and/or transportation facilities.
The resultant gaseous stream 80 from the end flash vessel 12 can be passed through the heat exchanger 14, through which the second feed stream 30 passes, usually countercurrently. The output of the gaseous stream 90 from the heat exchanger 14 can then be used as a fuel gas and/or used in other parts of the LNG plant.
Table I gives an overview of various data including pressures and temperatures of streams at various parts in an example process of
Further cold energy can be recovered from the output stream 90 from the heat exchanger 14 by one or more further heat exchanges, such as using one or more further heat exchangers.
The arrangement in
Another advantage is that the cold energy in the gaseous stream 80 can be recovered up to a temperature of above +0°, possibly up to +20°, +30° or even +40° C. or above, as opposed to hitherto recovering cold only up to a maximum of −40° C. or only −50° C. from a reject gas stream against a standard liquid refrigerant. The wider temperature approach can be used to decrease the cold recovery heat exchanger 14 in general, such as the heat exchanger area. The resultant fuel gas 90 from the heat exchanger 14 is useable at +0°, +20°, +30° or +40° C. or above as an energy source for the plant.
The efficiency (i.e. overall energy running requirement) of the overall LNG plant is therefore benefited by being able to achieve cold recovery from the gaseous stream 80 over its entire temperature range, and by being able to transfer cold directly from the gaseous stream to a feed stream, rather than through one or more intermediate refrigerant streams (with the loss of energy recovery at each exchange).
This efficiency can be demonstrated by comparing the increase in work energy created by the expander 22 in the scheme shown in
In a first alternative, the stream 80 is passed to an alternative one or more heat exchangers to recover the cold energy therefrom, said heat exchanger(s) preferably being part of an LNG liquefaction system, such as the liquefaction heat exchanger 18 shown in
The person skilled in the art will understand that the present invention can be carried out in many various ways without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06113923 | May 2006 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2007/053681 | 4/16/2007 | WO | 00 | 11/13/2008 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2007/131850 | 11/22/2007 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2930202 | Yendall | Mar 1960 | A |
| 3203191 | French | Aug 1965 | A |
| 3274787 | Grenier et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
| 3535885 | Frijlink Willem et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
| 3616652 | Engel | Nov 1971 | A |
| 3702063 | Etzbach et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
| 3792590 | Lofredo et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
| 4033735 | Swenson | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4112700 | Forg | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4155729 | Gray et al. | May 1979 | A |
| 4407135 | Pahade | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4541852 | Newton et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
| 4548629 | Chiu | Oct 1985 | A |
| 5421165 | Paradowski et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5613373 | Grenier | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5669234 | Houser et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5701761 | Prevost et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5890378 | Rambo et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5943881 | Grenier | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6041620 | Olszewski et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6105391 | Capron | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6116050 | Yao et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6237365 | Trebble | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6250105 | Kimble | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6333445 | O'Brien | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6378330 | Minta et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6401486 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6591632 | Mahoney | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6658892 | Fanning et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6898949 | Paradowski | May 2005 | B2 |
| 7051553 | Mak et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 20020042550 | Pironti et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20030177785 | Kimble et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040079107 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040177646 | Wilkinson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20050056051 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050155381 | Yang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20070012071 | Huang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070012072 | Qualls et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070062216 | Mak et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20080016910 | Brostow et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 19821242 | Nov 1999 | DE |
| 1008823 | Sep 2004 | EP |
| 1469266 | Oct 2004 | EP |
| WO02101307 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO03106906 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| WO2004109180 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO2005045338 | May 2005 | WO |
| WO2009101127 | Aug 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Paradowski, H, et al: “High Efficiency 6 MTPA LNG Train Design via Two Different Mixed Refrigerant Processes”, AICHE National Meeting, Mar. 10, 2002, pp. 245-247. |
| Schoenmakers, PJ, et al:: “Comparison of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography and gas chromatography—mass spectrometry for the characterization of complex hydrocarbon mixtures”, Journal of Chromatograph A, 892 92000) pp. 29-46. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090095019 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
