Method and apparatus for loading and unloading cargo from a twin-hull sea-going ship

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6550408
  • Patent Number
    6,550,408
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, December 19, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 22, 2003
    21 years ago
Abstract
A method of loading floatable containers onto, and discharging floatable containers from, a seaworthy vessel to facilitate the transport of cargo. The vessel includes twin hulls which lie beneath the water's surface, a device for controlling the draft and the horizontal position of the vessel, a plurality of submersible platforms each of which lies on a longitudinally and transversely subdivided controllable air cell, device for controlling the draft and the horizontal position of the submersible platforms, and transverse trusses having engagement devices to support said platforms. The levels and the horizontal position of both the hulls and the aforementioned platforms are manipulated by air provided by on-board turbo air compressors running open-loop within their speed-delivery characteristics and/or by air vented from the hulls and the aforementioned platforms, regulated by valves controlled by a central processor with software for the continuous automatic correcting of calculated valve setting programs and for using the valve setting programs corrected during the preceding load cycle for the subsequent discharge cycle, to permit for efficient changes between loading draft and voyage draft.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention is generally directed to the effective loading and unloading of cargo from a seaworthy ship. More specifically, the method and apparatus of the present invention provides for the efficient loading and unloading of floatable cargo containers onto submersible platforms of twin-hull ships. The method and apparatus of the present invention is particularly effective for the short-sea trade.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




As global commerce has expanded, it has become increasingly necessary to effectively transport goods from one location to a remote location that transverses over water. Containers of goods are transported inland by means of railroads, trucks, inland waterway vessels, etc. The permissible range of operation of land-bound carriers or vessels for inland navigation ends at the coast. At that point, cargo transported by inland waterway vessels and to be carried across the sea must be transferred from a non-seaworthy inland vessel to a seaworthy ship.




It is most inconvenient, time-consuming and costly to transfer goods from inland waterway vessels to seaworthy ships, particularly if the goods contained within the waterway vessels need to be repackaged. In utilizing such known techniques, it is often similarly necessary to again repackage the cargo when the seaworthy ship arrives at the importing port and the optimal inland carrier would be inland vessels.




In the prior art, numerous types of vessels for carrying laden inland waterway vessels across the sea were developed. For example, the prior art provides a LASH (“Lighter Aboard SHip”) carrier, a BACO (“BArge/Container”) liner, and a BarCat (“BARge CATamaran”) ship. Each of these prior art vessels requires application specific machinery.




The prior art LASH carrier and BACO liner are ships primarily designed for the deep-sea trade in which time expended for cargo handling after a typically long voyage is less critical than in the short-sea trade with its frequent layover times after short voyages. Both LASH carriers and BACO liners utilize barges specifically built for the carrier vessel. This greatly enhances costs. The LASH carrier takes these barges aboard one after another by means of a ship-borne crane, while the BACO liner floats the barges in and out one after another through its bowgate. Accordingly, the exchange of incoming versus outgoing barges takes much time that contributes to these deep-sea barge carriers not being economically viable in the short-sea trade. The considerably smaller BarCat also relies on barges built specifically for the carrier ship and has proven uneconomical because of its relatively small size.




The LASH carrier, the BACO liner, the BarCat ship, and other earlier barge carriers employ barges specifically built for the carrier vessel. All of these prior art barges are smaller than inland barges and, because of their small size, are less—or not at all—economically viable in inland navigation. In fact, the repacking of cargo may be required. Additionally, the exchange of arriving versus departing barges takes too much time to be economically viable in the short-sea trade.




Particularly for the short-sea trade, a semi-submersible or SWATH (“Small Water-plane Area Twin Hull”) ship has garnered particular attention as a special barge carrier that would effectively transport laden inland vessels across the sea. SWATHs are multi-hulled ships. Each hull is narrow in the plane of the water surface, providing a much greater cross section deeper below the surface. Due to this configuration, a SWATH has no cargo holds inside the hull (dry holds) as is characteristic of conventional vessels, but must carry dry cargo on deck, while the lower section of the hull serves as a buoyant body only. The buoyant body contains ballast tanks which, depending on the various load conditions of the SWATH, are filled with more or less water for keeping the vessel at an effective operating draft. Because it can carry its cargo on deck, a SWATH can accommodate full-size inland waterway vessels of all types such as lighters, push barges, self-propelled barges, or any other floatable containers. Of course, in order to benefit from this advantage, as well as from its economy of scale for the short-sea trade, a large SWATH-type barge carrier must be able to rapidly discharge and load floatable containers despite its larger size.




A specific embodiment of a large SWATH proposed as a carrier ship for floatable containers is described in German Patent Application Serial No. DE 42 29 706 A1, which was invented by the same inventor as the present invention. The ship disclosed in the aforementioned German patent application has been referred to as a Trans Sea Lifter (“TSL”). While the aforementioned German patent application is hereby incorporated into this patent by this reference, it is different than the TSL ship shown in FIG.


1


. The TSL ship


100


of

FIG. 1

has submersible platforms capable of receiving numerous barges—i.e., floatable containers—in a variety of sizes, not only standard barges. However, due to the carrying of different barges, or of a different number of barges, the process of immersing or raising the platforms is more complex and constitutes part of the present invention.




Ship


100


is a SWATH in the form of a catamaran that, between its bow and stern structures, is subdivided by transverse trusses


5


into several cargo spaces, each of which is equipped with a submersible platform


4


between vertical guides. The submersible platform


4


is capable of being flooded and de-watered for loading and discharging floatable containers


12


. When ship


100


is on the sea, the submersible platform


4


should sit well above the water. When exchanging floatable containers laden with goods, ship


100


should increase its draft until its submersible platforms


4


become waterborne. After submersible platforms


4


are submerged, the floatable containers


12


arranged on their deck become waterborne and are exchanged with new floatable containers. Newly laden with floatable containers


12


, the submersible platforms


4


should resurface out of the water when ship


100


prepares for continuing its voyage.




While the aforementioned German patent application provided a TSL extremely effective for short-sea trade, new means have been provided for effectively controlling the level of the submersible platforms


4


of ship


100


for loading, unloading, and sea travel.




It is therefore a primary object of the present invention to provide a new and improved method and apparatus for loading and unloading cargo from a multi-hull ship.




It is another object of the present invention to provide a new and improved method and apparatus for loading and unloading cargo from a multi-hull ship in a more economical manner.




It is yet a further object of the present invention to provide a new and improved method and apparatus for loading and unloading cargo from a multi-hull ship at a faster speed.




It is another object of the present invention to provide a new and improved method and apparatus for loading and unloading of floatable containers wherein the ship can accommodate cargo-laden floatable containers of various sizes.




It is yet still a further object of the present invention to provide a new and improved method and apparatus for loading and unloading of floatable containers wherein loading and unloading can be performed simultaneously.




It is still another object of the present invention to provide a new and improved method and apparatus for loading and unloading cargo from a multi-hull ship wherein the levels of the receiving floatable platforms of the ship can be readjusted periodically.




Other objects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the specification and the drawings.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Briefly stated and in accordance with the preferred embodiments of the present invention, . . .











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter regarded as the invention herein, it is believed that the present invention will be more readily understood upon consideration of the description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

is a schematic illustration of a twin-hull ship utilized in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 2

is a schematic, longitudinal view of the twin-hull ship utilized in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 3

is an exploded view of the afterbody


15


of the twin-hull ship of

FIG. 2

utilized in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 4

is a schematic illustration of air piping systems for venting air from, and for injecting air into, hull tanks of the twinhull ship in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 5

is a schematic illustration of air piping systems for venting air from, and for injecting air into, cells of a submersible platform of the twin-hull ship in accordance with the present invention;





FIGS. 6



a


,


6




b




6




c


are various illustrations of hose connections between a transverse truss and the submersible platform of the twin-hull ship utilized in accordance with the present invention;





FIG. 7

is a schematic illustration of the support of a submersible platform at the transverse truss in the twin-hull ship utilized in accordance with the present invention;





FIGS. 8



a


and


8




b


are schematic illustrations of the arrangement of pressure sensors utilized for measuring depth of the twin-hull ship and its submersible platforms in accordance with the present invention; and





FIGS. 9



a


,


9




b


, and


9




c


are schematic illustrations of the twin hulls and its submersible platform showing air intake and exhaust valves and pressure sensors of the twin-hull ship and its submersible platforms in accordance with the present invention; and





FIGS. 10



a


,


10




b


,


10




c


and


10




d


are flow charts of the operational process that controls the re-emergence and immersion of the twin-hull ship and its submersible platforms in accordance with the present invention.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PERFERRED EMBODIMENT




Referring first to

FIG. 1

, a twin-hull TSL, generally designated


100


, is shown. While the preferred embodiment of the present invention will be described in connection with a twin-hull TSL, it is equally effective with ships having adjustable submersible loading platforms and more than two hulls. Ship


100


has hulls


1


and


1


′, propellers


2


and


2


′, and rudders


3


and


3


′. Submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ are seated on supports (not shown in

FIG. 1

) between transverse trusses


5


,


5


′,


5


″ and


5


′″ which, together with the structures of a forecastle


6


and a poop


7


, connect hulls


1


and


1


′ to each other. A bridge


8


and smoke stacks


9


and


9


′ of the propulsion plants (not shown) in hulls


1


and


1


′ are arranged on poop


7


. There are two optional barge handling tugs


10


and


10


′, which are stored in a berth


11


aft of poop


7


. These optional tugs


10


and


10


′ provide assistance for loading waterborne floatable containers


12


,


12


′,


12


″,


12


′″,


12


″″ and


12


′″″ off and onto submerged submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″. Obviously, for self-propelled inland waterway vessels and similar floatable containers, optional tugs


10


and


10


′ are unnecessary.




Referring next to

FIG. 2

, the longitudinal view of hull


1


in ship


100


is shown. The view of hull


1


′ would be identical. An afterbody


15


includes a pressure sensor


13


and an engine room


14


.

FIG. 3

is an exploded view of afterbody


15


, and further includes a hull tank


16


and a service alleyway


17


. A cargo space


24


is created between transverse trusses


5


and


5


′. Hull tanks


16


and


16


′ and service alleyway


17


below submersible platform


4


are within cargo space


24


. A turbo compressor


26


generates compressed air for controlling the level of submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ by means of a compressed air main


28


. Similarly, a turbo compressor


27


generates compressed air to hull tanks


16


and


16


′ by means of a compressed air main


29


. As mentioned above, submersible platforms


4


fit on supports at the sides


23


and


23


′ of adjacent transverses trusses


5


and


5


′. When ship


100


and submersible platforms


4


, respectively, are re-emerging, a high volume of compressed air at relatively low, continuously changing pressure is required from turbo compressor


26


and turbo compressor


27


for ejecting water from hull tanks


16


and submersible platforms


4


, respectively. Because of the quick sequence of operations and the high volume of air, turbo compressor


26


and turbo compressor


27


are typically high electrically-powered turbo compressors. Such available compressors are known in the art.




Compressed air for hull tank


16


is generated by turbo compressor


27


in engine room


14


. Except for limiting minimum delivery pressure, turbo compressors


27


generally run openloop within their operating range because delivery volume and pressure are regulated by check valves


32


of a piping system


31


(FIG.


4


). Compressed air at lower delivery pressure for the submersible platforms


4


is generated by turbo compressor


26


in engine room


14


of hulls


1


and


1


′. Each turbo compressor


26


supplies cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ of one half-side of all submersible platforms


4


. This arrangement is best seen in FIG.


5


. Turbo compressors


26


also generally run open-loop within their operating range because delivery volume and pressure are regulated by check valves


44


of a piping system


43


. The aforementioned pressure sensor


13


in afterbody


15


of ship


100


and a pressure sensor


18


in a forebody


19


of ship


100


are utilized for measuring water pressure for determining actual draft. A remote-controlled shut-off valve


30


is also made available on the bottom of hull tank


16


.




The extreme ends of hulls


1


and


1


′ of ship


100


are connected in forebody


19


by forecastle


6


and in afterbody


15


by poop


7


. When ship


100


is at voyage draft, hulls


1


and


1


′ in forebody


6


and afterbody


15


bear only their own weight and that of the deck structures of forecastle


6


and poop


7


above them. The water surface during voyage draft is reflected by water level


20


in FIG.


2


. When ship


100


re-immerses to loading draft, forebody


19


and afterbody


15


immerse by flooding assigned ballast tanks


16


and


16


′ in hulls


1


and


1


′. The water surface during loading draft is reflected by water level


21


in FIG.


2


. The volume of water which hull tanks


16


and


16


′ take in is equal to the small volume of water which the above-water components of forecastle


6


and poop


7


displace when they are immersed with ship


100


. At this point, the water-tight margin plating


52


of the lowest water-tight decks


22


and


25


in forecastle


6


and poop


7


, respectively, extend below a deck


37


. Vent pipes


47


open the volume encompassed by deck


37


and margin plating


52


to the atmosphere so that no air cushion is captured when forecastle


6


and poop


7


sink into the water with immersing ship


100


.




When ship


100


sails at voyage draft, the lowest water-tight deck


22


in forecastle


6


as M) shown in

FIG. 2

sits several meters above the water surface. However, when ship


100


is immersed to loading draft, water-tight deck


22


lies exactly in the water surface so that forecastle


6


has a buoyant body and stabilizes ship


100


at its bow. The same principle applies to lowest water-tight deck


25


in poop


7


which, thus, correspondingly stabilizes ship


100


at its stern.





FIG. 4

shows an example wherein service alleyway


17


contains the air piping systems for both injecting air into, and for venting air from, hull tanks


16


and


16


′. These piping systems are dimensioned in ship


100


to immerse and re-emerge within the programmed time span at a throughput of air equal to 90% of full capacity, thus providing a range of plus/minus 10% for regulating the air flow rate.




Compressed air main


29


is connected to hull tanks


16


and


16


′ by branch lines


31


and


31


′ that are equipped with remote-controlled check valves


32


and


32


′ for regulating air flow into assigned hull tanks


16


and


16


′. Hull tanks


16


and


16


′ are vented by assigned pipe lines


33


and


33


′ that are equipped with remote-controlled check valves


34


and


34


′ for regulating the flow of outgoing (i.e., vented) air. Pipe lines


33


and


33


′ in service alleyway


17


are connected to a common line


35


which runs upward through a column or stanchion


36


and transverse truss


5


′ to emit outgoing air into the atmosphere.





FIG. 5

shows a part of cargo space


24


with submersible platform


4


and the piping systems which vent submersible platform


4


for submerging and supply it with compressed air for re-emerging. Within the boundary of water-tight margin plating


52


, submersible platform


4


below its deck


37


is subdivided into cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ by water-tight longitudinal bulkheads


38


and


38


′ and transverse bulkheads


39


and


39


′. When submersible platform


4


is waterborne, each of cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ contains a separate air cushion. The piping systems for venting and/or injecting compressed air are dimensioned for submersible platform


4


to submerge and re-emerge within the programmed time span by a throughput of air equal to 90% of full capacity, thus providing a range of plus/minus 10% for regulating the air flow.




Cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ of each half-side of submersible platforms


4


between a centerline


41


and the outboard edge of submersible platform


4


are supplied with compressed air by compressed air main


28


, which is contained in service alleyway


17


in hulls


1


and


1


′ below the corresponding outboard edge of submersible platform


4


. A branch of compressed air main


28


runs through columns or stanchions


36


upward into a service alleyway


51


in transverse truss


5


where, as a main line


42


, it supplies compressed air to submersible platform


4


. Branch lines


43


,


43


′,


43


″ and


43


′″ from main line


42


are linked by hose connections


45


to branch lines


46


,


46


′,


46


″ and


46


′″, which end in assigned cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ inside submersible platform


4


. The configuration of branch line


43


with remote-controlled check valve


44


for regulating the flow of compressed air and a hose connection


45


to assign pipe section


46


inside cell


40


of submersible platform


4


is typical of all branch lines for compressed air. All check valves


44


are located inside service alleyway


51


.




Cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ of submersible platforms


4


are vented directly by vent lines


47


,


47


′,


47


″ and


47


′″; a hose connection


49


; and assigned pipe section


50


,


50


′,


50


″ and


50


′″ in assigned cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ of submersible platform


4


. The configuration of vent line


47


with a remote-control check valve


48


for regulating the flow of outgoing air and a hose connection


49


to assigned pipe section


50


′ inside submersible platform


4


is typical of all branch lines for venting the compressed air. All checked valves


48


are also located in service alleyway


51


.





FIGS. 6



a


,


6




b


, and


6




c


are a side view, a plan view and a cross sectional view, respectively, of the preferred hose connections by means of branch lines


43


,


43


′,


43


″ and


43


′″ between the piping system and service alleyway


51


of transverse truss


5


and the pipe sections


46


,


46


′,


46


″ and


46


′″ in submersible platform


4


. Typically, a hose connection


45


consist of a hose with a flange at each end which connects branch lines


43


′,


43


″ and


43


′″ to corresponding pipe sections


46


,


46


′,


46


″ and


46


′″. In order to minimize the possibility of damage by moving floatable containers


12


, hoses


45


are arranged behind a protective shield


54


which is attached to deck


37


of submersible platform


4


. Hoses


45


are looped over a guide yoke


55


mounted on protective shield


54


so that, when submersible platform


4


is fully submerged and rests in its deep position on hulls


1


and


1


″, the length of the then-extended hoses


45


suffices for the distance between transverse truss


5


and submersible platform


4


. Openings


56


in protective shield


54


provide access to the flanges between hoses


45


and all aforementioned pipes. Fenders


53


, arranged vertically on transverse truss


5


along both sides of protective shield


54


, prevent hoses


45


from drifting sideways when submersible platform


4


is submerged.




Turning now to

FIG. 7

, the typical support mechanism of submersible platform


4


at transverse truss


5


is illustrated. Attached to side


23


of transverse truss


5


(that faces submersible platform


4


) is a bearing rail


57


that carries a tiltable support rail


58


. Subdivided into sections, bearing rail


57


and tiltable support rail


58


extend over the entire width of transverse truss


5


. Affixed to the top of support rail


58


is a top rail


59


on which a bearing bar


60


of submersible platform


4


is carried. Bearing bar


60


is a continuous bar along the entire width of submersible platform


4


, being fixed to margin plating


52


of submersible platform


4


, which itself extends above deck


37


. When ship


100


sails at voyage draft, submersible platform


4


rests with bearing bars


60


on top rails


59


and its bottom lies several meters above water. When ship


100


is immersed to loading draft, submersible platform


4


is waterborne at the programmed freeboard. In this position, bearing bar


60


of submersible platform


4


sits above top rail


59


so that no load remains on support rail


58


. After having been unburdened, support rails


58


are retracted by an actuator


61


and a lever


62


through openings


63


in the plating of transverse trusses


5


. When retracted to transverse trusses


5


, the clear width between opposite top rails


59


exceeds the span over bearing bar


60


of submersible platforms


4


so that submersible platforms


4


can pass through when submerging. Transverse displacement of lever


62


is prevented by a guide plate


64


. When support rail


58


is extended, e.g., for maintenance purposes, while lying above submersible platform


4


, lever


62


butts against guide plate


64


before support rails


58


can tilt beyond the operating range of actuator


61


. The position of support rails


58


, either fully retracted or fully extended, is monitored by photo cells (not shown).




When surfacing, submersible platform


4


rises through the gap between retracted top rails


59


up to the programmed freeboard, at which point, its bearing bars


60


sit above top rails


59


. Subsequently, support rails


58


are extended by actuator


61


and butt against margin plating


52


of submersible platform


4


. When ship


100


subsequently re-emerges to voyage draft, top rails


59


on transverse trusses


5


rise with it, engage bearing bars


60


, and lift submersible platform


4


out of the water.





FIGS. 8



a


and


8




b


effectively illustrate the arrangement of pressure sensors


65


,


65


′,


66


and


66


′ on hulls


1


and


1




a


and submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″. Pressure sensors


65


,


65


′,


66


and


66


′ provide feedback to the load computer in bridge


8


on actual draft while ship


100


immerses or re-emerges. The side view in

FIG. 8



b


shows pressure sensors


18


and


18


′ arranged at the lowest points of hulls


1


and


1


′ in forebody


19


as well as pressure sensors


13


and


13


′ in afterbody


15


.





FIGS. 9



a


,


9




b


, and


9




c


are schematic illustrations of the hulls


1


and


1


′ and the cargo platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ of ship


100


. Shown are pressure sensors


18


and


18


′ in forebody


19


and pressure sensors


13


and


13


′ in afterbody


15


of hulls


1


and


1


′. Also shown are the exemplary hull tanks


16


and


16


′ with related air intake check valves


32


and


32


′ and exhaust check valves


34


and


34


′. Similar combinations of air intake check valves


69


and


69


′ and exhaust check valves


70


and


70


′ are provided for trimm control tanks


67


and


67


′ in afterbody


15


. Corresponding combinations of air intake check valves


71


and


71


′ and exhaust check valves


72


and


72


′ are provided for trimm control tanks


68


and


68


′ in forebody


19


.

FIG. 9

shows, furthermore, one of the submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ with related air intake check valves


44


and exhaust check valves


48


and pressure sensors


65


and


65


′ at the aft and forward edges and pressure sensors


66


and


66


′ at the starboard and port outboard edges. The cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″, and


40


′″ of the submersible platform


4


are summarily illustrated; however, the differentiation between cells


40


along its port and starboard edges for controlling list—i.e. inclination in transverse direction—and cells


40


′″ at the aft edge and cell


40


′ at the forward edge for controlling trimm—i.e. inclination in longitudinal direction—should be noted.





FIGS. 10



a


,


10




b


,


10




c


and


10




d


are simplified operational flow diagrams illustrating the principle of controlling depth and level position of the hulls


1


and


1


′ and the submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ of ship


100


. They show the overall process flow of the novel method. The top part of each of the diagrams shows the calculation of the control profile of each air intake or exhaust valve which controls the flow of compressed air into or of exhaust air from, a hull tank, or a trimm control tank in the hulls


1


and


1


′, or a cell of the submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ of ship


100


, all of which are described further below.





FIG. 10



a


shows the process flow of one of submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ when re-emerging with a new load of floatable containers


12


from its deeply submerged position to the water-borne position when the submersible platform


4


has reached the planned draft for being locked into two adjacent transverse trusses


5


and


5


′ of ship


100


.




The process starts with the calculation of the basic flow rate cycle of compressed air into each of the cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ of submersible platform


4


throughout the re-emergence of submersible platform


4


, as shown at the top of the diagram. Constant components of the software for calculating the basic flow rate are the hydrostatic data of ship


100


and the characteristics of turbo-compressors


26


and the piping systems for compressed air and for exhaust air. Current inputs are the sea conditions—e.g. swell, wind pressure—and the barge data—e.g. displacement, draft and their planned distribution on submersible platform


4


. Once the calculations are completed, the intake check valves


44


for compressed air for each cell


40


,


40


′ and


40


′″ are set, following a pre-planned cycle which lasts from the submersible platform


4


rising from its position resting on hulls


1


and


1


′ to the position where the submersible platform


4


is water-borne at the planned draft.




The lower part of

FIG. 10



a


shows in the left half the steps of the process for controlling list and in the right half the steps for controlling trimm of submersible platform


4


. Addressing the left half of this part of the diagram, list is present when the water pressure—i.e., depth—measured by pressure sensors


66


′ at the port edge and pressure sensors


66


at the starboard edge of submersible platform


4


differs. If list does not equal zero, the flow of compressed air into the cells


40


of the submersible platform


4


at the side of the pressure sensor showing the higher water pressure—i.e. having deeper draft—is increased by adjusting the setting of air intake check valve


44


. In case of a major deviation, the counter-balancing of list is accelerated by simultaneously releasing a blast of air from cells


40


at the opposite (high) edge of submersible platform


4


. When list equals zero, the basic flow rate of compressed air remains as pre-calculated above.




The water pressure read by pressure sensors


65


at the aft edge and


65


′ at the forward edge of submersible platform


4


is similarly utilized for checking trimm of submersible platform


4


and for counter-balancing trimm by adjusting the flow of compressed air and/or of exhaust air of platform cells


40


′″ at the aft edge and platform cells


40


′ at the forward edge of submersible platform


4


.




The mean water depth measured by pressure sensors


65


and


65


′ as well as pressure sensors


66


and


66


′ is further utilized for checking whether submersible platform


4


has attained the pre-planned draft required for locking it into transverse trusses


5


. When this depth is attained, compressed air intake valves


44


of submersible platform


4


are closed.




Next, all adjustments of the basic flow rate cycle are related to the recorded external causes, separate for list and trimm. After elimination of transitory external causes—e.g. an actual gust of wind or the actual swell in a specific roadstead while ship


100


is loading—the remaining validated adjustments are used for calculating the corrected flow rate cycle for the exhaust valves


48


of all platform cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ for the subsequent submerging of submersible platform


4


with the same load.





FIG. 10



b


shows the process flow of hulls


1


and


1


′ of ship


100


when re-emerging from loading draft to voyage draft while carrying the newly loaded submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ that are now locked into two adjacent transverse trusses


5


and


5


′ of ship


100


.




As shown on the top of

FIG. 10



b


, the process starts with the calculation of the basic flow rate cycle of compressed air into each of hull tanks


16


and


16


′ and into the trimm control tanks


67


and


67


′ in the afterbody


15


and into the trim control tanks of


68


and


68


′ in the forebody


19


, as well as of the flow rate of exhaust air from submersible platform cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ of submersible platform


4


which parallels the rate at which compressed air is injected into hull tanks


16


and


16


′. Constant components of the software for calculating the basic flow rate throughout the re-emergence of hulls


1


and


1


′ of ship


100


are the same as given for

FIG. 10



a


. Current inputs are the sea conditions as in

FIG. 10



a


, the volume of compressed air previously injected into submersible platform


4


for re-emerging (and recorded at that time), and the signal that submersible platform


4


is locked in place and ready for being lifted when the hulls


1


and


1


′ of the ship


100


re-emerge. Once the calculations are completed, air intake check valves


32


and


32


′ for compressed air of hull tanks


16


and


16


′, air intake check valves


69


and


69


′ of trimm control tanks


67


and


67


′ in the afterbody


15


, air intake check valves


71


and


71


′ of trimm control tanks


68


and


68


′ in forebody


19


, and exhaust air valves


48


of submersible platform cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ are set according to the pre-planned cycle. This cycle defines the re-emergence of hulls


1


and


1


′ of ship


100


from loading draft to voyage draft and the resultant lifting of submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ out of the water.




The next lower part of

FIG. 10



b


shows in the left half the steps of the process for controlling list and in the right half the steps for controlling trimm of hulls


1


and


1


′ of the ship


100


. Addressing the left half of this part of the diagram, list is present when the mean water pressure—i.e. depth—of the port side hull


1


′measured by pressure sensors


13


′ and


18


′ differs from the mean water pressure measured by the pressure sensors


13


and


18


of the starboard hull


1


. If list is not equal zero, the flow of compressed air into hull tanks


16


and


16


′ of the deeper—lagging—hulls


1


or


1


′ is increased by adjusting the related air intake check valve


32


or


32


′.




The mean water pressure read by pressure sensors


13


,


13


′,


18


and


18


′ is utilized for checking whether hulls


1


and


1


′ have attained voyage draft. When this is the case, compressed air intake check valves


32


and


32


′ of hull tanks


16


and


16


′ are closed.




The lower right half of

FIG. 10



b


shows that trimm is controlled by a different method, i.e. not by measuring water pressure but by measuring the trimm gradient by means of a highly sensitive inclinometer. Any occurring trimm is counterbalanced by increasing the flow rate of compressed air into trimm control tanks


67


and


67


′ or


68


and


68


′ at the deeper end of hulls


1


and


1


′. In case of a major deviation, the counter-balancing of trimm is accelerated by simultaneously releasing a blast of air from trimm control tanks


67


and


67


′ or trim control tanks


68


and


68


′ at the higher end of hulls


1


and


1


′. When trimm equals zero, the basic flow rate of compressed air into trimm control tanks


67


and


67


′ or


68


and


68


′ remains as pre-calculated above.




All adjustments of the basic flow rate cycle are related to the recorded external causes, separate for list and trimm, as indicated by the shaded blocks at the bottom of

FIG. 10



b


. After elimination of transitory external causes, the remaining validated adjustments are used for calculating the corrected flow rate cycle for exhaust valves


34


and


34


′ of all hull tanks


16


and


16


′ and of exhaust valves


70


,


70


′,


72


,


72


′ of the trimm control tanks


67


,


67


′,


68


and


68


′ for the subsequent submerging of hulls


1


and


1


′ of ship


100


with the same load.





FIG. 10



c


shows the process flow of hulls


1


and


1


′ of ship


100


when rapidly immersing from voyage draft to loading draft at which submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ with their now known burden have become water-borne and are no longer carried by hulls


1


and


1


′ of ship


100


.




As shown at the top of

FIG. 10



c


, the process starts with the calculation of the basic flow rate cycles of exhaust air from each of hull tanks


16


and


16


′ and from trimm control tanks


67


and


67


′ in afterbody


15


and from trimm control tanks


68


and


68


′ in forebody


19


, and the calculation of the flow rate of compressed air into submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ towards ensuring that submersible platform


4


will be water-borne when hulls


1


and


1


′ are at loading draft. Constant components of the software for calculating the basic flow rate of each valve throughout the immersion of hulls


1


and


1


′ of ship


100


are the same as given for

FIG. 10



a


. Current inputs are the sea conditions, the now very accurate corrected flow rate cycle of exhaust air for immersion of hulls


1


and


1


′ and of the corrected flow rate cycle of compressed air for rendering submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ water-borne when hulls


1


and


1


′ are at loading draft, both calculated and recorded during the preceding re-emergence of hulls


1


and


1


′, and, finally, the signal that the air pressure inside hull tanks


16


and


16


′ is restored to the reference pressure recorded at the end of the re-emergence of hulls


1


and


1


′ during the preceding re-emergence of hulls


1


and


1


′ from loading draft to voyage draft.




The lower half of

FIG. 10



c


shows the process steps for controlling list, trimm and depth of immersion while hulls


1


and


1


′ quickly immerse to loading draft. List control is effected by measuring the mean draft of starboard hull


1


by means of pressure sensors


13


in afterbody


15


and pressure sensors


18


in forebody


19


and the mean draft of port hull


1


′ correspondingly. If list occurs, the flow rates of exhaust check valve


34


in starboard hull


1


and of exhaust valve


34


′ in port hull


1


′ are increased or decreased as required to counter-act list. If no list occurs, the calculated setting of exhaust check valves


34


and


34


′ is not changed.




The mean water pressure read by pressure sensors


13


,


13


′,


18


and


18


′ is utilized for checking whether hulls


1


and


1


′ have attained loading draft. When this is the case, exhaust air check valves


34


and


34


′ of hull tanks


16


and


16


′ are closed.




The lower right half of

FIG. 10



c


shows that trimm is controlled as shown in

FIG. 10



b


, i.e., by measuring the trimm gradient by means of a highly sensitive inclinometer. Trimm is counterbalanced by increasing the flow rate of exhaust air from trimm control tanks


67


and


67


′ or


68


and


68


′ at the higher end of hulls


1


and


1


′.




Acceleration of counter-balancing list or trimm by injecting compressed air into trimm control tanks


67


and


67


′ or


68


and


68


′ at the lower side or end of hulls


1


and


1


′ is not contemplated as the exhaust air flow rate cycles based on the corrected values gained during the preceding re-emergence are highly accurate, and as the process of immersion is very rapid and ends in self-stabilizing conditions when hulls


1


and


1


′ of ship


100


are at loading draft.





FIG. 10



d


shows the process flow of one of submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ when being submerged with a known load of barges from its water-borne position to its deeply submerged position at which all floatable containers


12


are water-borne and the submersible platform


4


rest on top of the hulls


1


and


1


′ of ship


100


.




The process starts with the calculation of the basic flow rate cycle of exhaust air from each of cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


″′ of submersible platform


4


throughout submerging, as shown at the top of

FIG. 10



d


. Constant components of the software for calculating the basic flow rate are the same as defined for

FIG. 10



a


. Current inputs are the actual sea conditions, the corrected flow rate cycles of all valves calculated and recorded after the preceding re-emergence of submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ with their actual load of floatable containers


12


, and the signal that all those submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ which are to be submerged have been disengaged from their support system at transverse trusses


5


,


5


′,


5


″ and


5


′″ of ship


100


. Once the calculations are completed, air exhaust check valves


48


of each cell


40


,


40


′ and


40


′″ are set, following a pre-planned cycle which lasts from submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ being water-borne and carrying floatable containers


12


to its deeply submerged position when floatable containers


12


are afloat and the submersible platforms


4


,


4


′ and


4


″ are seated on hulls


1


and


1


′ of ship


100


.




The lower part of

FIG. 10



d


shows in the left half the steps of the process for controlling list and in the right half the steps for controlling trimm of a typical submersible platform


4


of ship


100


. The left half of the diagram shows that list measured by pressure sensors


66


and


66


′ is equalized by adjusting air exhaust check valves


48


at the high side of listing submersible platform


4


for increasing the flow rate of exhaust air. The right part of the

FIG. 10



d


shows that trimm of submersible platform


4


indicated by pressure sensors


65


at its aft edge and pressure sensors


65


′ at its forward edge is controlled correspondingly by counter-acting increases of the flow of exhaust air through exhaust check valves


48


in cells


40


′″ at the aft edge or exhaust check valves


48


in cells


40


′ at the forward edge of submersible platform


4


.




The mean water pressure read by pressure sensors


65


,


65


′,


66


,


66


′ is utilized for checking whether submersible platform


4


has attained the deeply submerged position on hulls


1


′ and


1


′ of ship


100


. When this is the case, air exhaust check valves


48


of submersible platform


4


are closed and an evenly distributed volume of residual air remains inside cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″.




Acceleration of counter-balancing list or trimm by injecting compressed air into the cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ or


40


′″ at the lower edge(s) of a tilting submersible platform


4


is not considered as the flow rate cycles of exhaust air based on the corrected values gained during the preceding re-emergence are highly accurate and as the process of submersion is very rapid and ends in self-stabilizing conditions for both the floatable containers


12


and the submersible platform


4


.




The physical details of the process flow summarized in

FIGS. 9 through 9



d


are defined below.




As outlined above in connection with

FIGS. 10



a


,


10




b


,


10




c


, and


10




d


, pressure sensors


18


and


18


′ in forebody


19


, and pressure sensors


13


and


13


′ in afterbody


15


monitor the level position of ship


100


transversal to its longitudinal axis. List is evident from hulls


1


and


1


′ having different draft. These differences are read by pressure sensors


13


,


13


′,


18


and


18


′ as differences in water pressure. This information is fed back to the load computer which calculates the change in ballast condition required for neutralizing list. The load computer will then either set check valves


34


of piping systems branch line


33


for venting or set check valves


32


of piping system branch line


31


for blowing compressed into hull tank


16


for ejecting water. As presently configured, pressure sensors


13


,


13


′,


18


and


18


′ are indeed sufficiently fast and accurate for monitoring draft and list of hulls


1


and


1


′. However, these sensors


13


,


13


′,


18


and


18


′ are not sufficiently fast and accurate to determine the direction of the “trim” (inclination in the direction of the longitudinal axis) of ship


100


. Because of the great length of hulls


1


and


1


′, which are generally headed into the waves while floatable containers


12


are exchanged, pressures changes caused by widely spaced wave crests may be misinterpreted by the load computer. Thus, trim of hulls


1


and


1


′ is monitored by highly accurate, quick inclinometers similar to those which are used in mechanisms that keep barrels of naval guns in their pre-determined position despite the vessel's wave-induced motions. Such inclinometers are well known in the prior art.





FIG. 8



a


shows submersible platform


4


from below. Its actual depth is measured by reading water pressure at the bottom edge of its margin plating


52


. Suitable pressure sensors


65


and


65


′ in the centerline


41


of ship


100


at the transverse margin plating


52


, and sensors


66


and


66


′ in the middle of longitudinal margin plating


52


at the outboard edges of submersible platform


4


are arranged in pairs opposite to each other.




Pressure sensors


65


,


65


′,


66


, and


66


′ also monitor the level position of submersible platform


4


. If pressure sensors


66


and


66


′ (which lie opposite to each other at longitudinal margin plating


52


of submersible platform


4


) register list—i.e., inclination transversal to the longitudinal axis of ship—the size of the air cushions in cells


40


along its longitudinal edges is adjusted for neutralizing list. If pressure sensors


65


and


65


′ (which lie opposite to each other at transverse margin plating


52


of submersible platform


4


) register trim—i.e., inclination parallel to the longitudinal axis of ship


100


,—the air cushions in cells


40


′ and


40


′″ along its forward and rear edges at both sides of centerline


41


are adjusted for neutralizing trim.




The load computer controls the position of hulls


1


and


1


′ and submersible platforms


4


regarding draft and level position by setting remote-controlled check valves


32


,


32


′,


34


and


34


′ for selectively venting air. For this purpose, the load computer contains a control profile for the check valve of each cell


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ of submersible platform


4


or, respectively, of each hull tank


16


and


16


′. Calculated before ship


100


immerses or re-emerges, these control profiles continuously regulate check valves


32


,


32


′,


34


and


34


′ while the hulls


1


and


1


′ and submersible platforms


4


increase or decrease draft. Based on the planned draft programmed in the control profile and the feed-back on actual draft from pressure sensors


13


,


13


′,


18


,


18


′,


65


,


65


′,


66


, and


66


′, the load computer continuously compares the planned versus actual positions of hulls


1


and


1


′ and submersible platforms


4


, and incorporates necessary corrections.




The control profile is a file of control signals for continuously setting each check valve


32


,


32


′,


34


and


34


′ for the appropriate flow of air while hulls


1


and


1


′ and submersible platforms


4


immerse or re-emerge. The control profile is generated by special software in the load computer in bridge


8


of ship


100


. This software contains the hydrostatic data of ship


100


, e.g., its characteristic interdependence of carrying capacity, stability, draft and the required volume of and pressure in air cushions inside ballast hull tanks


16


of hulls


1


and


1


′ and inside cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″, and


40


′″ of submersible platforms


4


. Prior to ship


100


re-emerging with newly laden submersible platforms


4


, this software is used to calculate the control profiles for the specific loading condition based on the hydrostatic data of ship


100


and data on weight, draft, dimensions, centers of gravity of to-be-loaded floatable containers


12


, and on their arrangement on submersible platforms


4


.




When hulls


1


and


1


′ and submersible platforms


4


immerse and re-emerge, their actual position may deviate from the planned position programmed in the control profiles, e.g., if the weights of floatable containers


12


or their arrangement on deck


37


of submersible platforms


4


do not correspond with the premises made for calculating the control profiles. Accordingly, the continuous comparison of planned vs. actual position of hulls


1


and


1


′ and submersible platforms


4


may require correction of the control profiles of the assigned check valves. Adjustments of the control profile recorded when ship


100


re-emerges are re-calculated by the load computer for the subsequent immersion of ship


100


and incorporated into the corresponding control profiles. For immersing—which is more than twice as fast as re-emerging—the control profiles are, thus, highly accurate so that any further adjustments of check valves


32


,


32


′,


34


and


34


′ would be small and can be effected rapidly, or would not be necessary at all.




Immersion and re-emergence of hulls


1


and


1


′ and submersible platforms


4


are short, transient processes for which the referenced control and monitoring systems suffice. However, the time span of a voyage during which ship


100


floats on air cushions inside hull tanks


16


is considerably longer. During this time, minor leakage of check valves


32


and


34


of piping systems


31


and


33


could lead to—generally small—losses of air from hull tanks


16


. When subsequently ship


100


prepares for immersing and shut-off valves


30


in the bottom of hull tanks


16


are opened, water would flow into hull tanks


16


and equalize the loss of air. This would change the actual conditions in the hull tanks


16


from those assumed for calculating the control profiles for the check valves. For eliminating any potential risk, each hull tank


16


is equipped with a sensor for checking its internal air pressure. If the air pressure before the immersion of ship


100


would be lower than the pressure of the air cushion on which ship


100


had previously re-emerged, the control profiles cause compressed air to be blown into hull tanks


16


until the original air pressure is restored.




Up to this point, the interconnections of ship


100


have been shown and a brief synopsis of the operation thereof described. However, the present invention may be best described through the use of examples. Thus, it will be provided below an example of ship


100


rising from loading draft to voyage draft and immersing from voyage draft to loading draft. First, a broad understanding of the method of the present invention will be further described.




The method of the present invention is for the rapid adjustment of the position of hulls


1


and


1


and submersible platforms


4


regarding both draft as well as inclination in the longitudinal axis (“trim”) and transversal axis (“list”) of ship


100


while rapidly increasing and decreasing its draft. This process is independent of the much slower system which controls trim and list of ship


100


during a voyage and needs to compensate, for instance, the shift of the center of gravity of ship


100


caused by the consumption of fuel during voyage. The later system (i.e., adjusting for trim and list during voyage) is known in the art and is not the object of this invention. When ship


100


floats at voyage draft, the weight of the submersible platforms


4


, which are loaded with floatable containers


12


, is borne by hulls


1


and


1


′. However, when ship


100


is immersed to loading draft and the submersible platforms


4


in cargo space


24


are waterborne, the total weight of submersible platforms


4


and floatable containers


12


parked on them, is borne solely by submersible platforms


4


. The load is shifted from hulls


1


and


1


′ to the submersible platforms


4


when ship


100


immerses. Conversely, when ship


100


re-emerges, the buoyancy of hulls


1


and


1


′ and submersible platforms


4


is constantly adjusted by controlling the size of the air cushions inside hull tank


16


and inside cells


40


of submersible platform


4


.




Submersible platform


4


of ship


100


is designed to float with its deck


37


at a pre-determined height above the water—“freeboard”—when submersible platform


4


is waterborne on an air cushion at an internal pressure that is equal to the water pressure at the bottom of submersible platform


4


. Hence, the surface of the water inside the submersible platform


4


below the air cushion is level with the bottom of submersible platform


4


. In other words, the air cushion completely takes up the volume encompassed by watertight margin plating


52


below deck


37


of submersible platform


4


. On an air cushion of this volume, submersible platform


4


floats at the pre-determined free board when carrying its full load of floatable containers


12


.




Before ship


100


immerses from voyage draft to loading draft, submersible platforms


4


rest above the water surface on supports at transverse trusses


5


that connect the ship


100


hulls


1


and


1


′. When submersible platform


4


has gone down with the immersing ship


100


to the point where its margin plating


52


enters the water surface, air is captured inside the space encompassed by its deck


37


and margin plating


52


. When ship


100


immerses farther to loading draft, submersible platform


4


also sinks deeper. As water pressure increases with depth, the captured air is compressed, and the volume it takes up in submersible platform


4


decreases. Thus, the surface of the water below such an air cushion inside submersible platform


4


lies above the level of the lower edge of the margin plating


52


. Thus, the captured air does not fully take up the volume within margin plating


52


and deck


37


of submersible platform


4


. Hence, on a “meager” air cushion, which contains only the ambient air captured when submersible platform


4


became waterborne with immersing ship


100


, the submersible platform


4


does not attain its full carrying capacity.




Before ship


100


immerses, transverse trusses


5


carry the total weight of submersible platform


4


. When submersible platform


4


enters the water with the immersing ship


100


as described above, the air cushion captured inside it creates buoyancy and begins to carry submersible platform


4


. When this buoyancy has become equal to its total weight, submersible platform


4


floats at the then prevailing freeboard and no longer sinks deeper when ship


100


continues to immerse to loading draft. If said freeboard begins to exceed the freeboard required for engaging submersible platform


4


on its supports when ship


100


subsequently re-emerges, submersible platform


4


is vented until it floats at the required freeboard. However, if, after sinking into the water with immersing ship


100


, submersible platform


4


containing a meager air cushion floats at less than the required freeboard, or if it is so heavily laden that it would remain on its supports when ship


100


is immersed to loading draft, compressed air is blown into the submersible platform


4


until it floats at the required freeboard. The draft—and thus, the freeboard—at which submersible platform


4


becomes waterborne, is calculated by a load computer, and venting or injecting air is regulated correspondingly. The control processes for adjusting the freeboard of the submersible platform


4


begin before ship


100


is fully immersed to loading draft and are finished when it attains loading draft.




While submerging or re-emerging, the horizontal position of submersible platforms


4


is adjusted by venting or filling up air cushions in selected cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ of the submersible platform


4


. When not carrying a load, submersible platform


4


floats in level position on an air cushion of constant thickness due to its symmetrical structure and, thus, its symmetrically distributed weight. However, a submersible platform


4


usually carries several floatable containers


12


of different sizes so that their weights burden submersible platform


4


asymmetrically. Whereas an empty submersible platform


4


will float in level position on an air cushion of constant thickness, the submersible platform


4


would tilt under an asymmetrical load. In order to prevent tilting, the cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ of submersible platforms


4


are selectively vented—or blown with compressed air, respectively—so that the center of all buoyancy forces of the air cushions in the cells coincides with the common center of gravity of all floatable containers


12


. Hence, in a submersible platform


4


carrying floatable containers and floating in level position, the air cushions in its cells


40


differ in size.




The extent to which a submersible platform


4


is burdened by an array of floatable containers


12


changes while the submersible platform


4


submerges or re-surfaces. When it submerges from its level waterborne position and sinks farther below water, floatable containers


12


of different weight become waterborne one after another at different draft. This changes the weight that remains on the submersible platform


4


asymmetrically so that the size of the air cushions in the submersible platform


4


cells must be adjusted continuously so that their common center of buoyancy coincides with the center of gravity of the floatable containers


12


that remain on the submersible platform


4


.




Correspondingly, when submersible platform


4


rises from its deeply submerged position and floating containers


12


of different draft land on its deck


37


one after another, the size of air cushions in cells


40


must be adjusted continuously. Thus, compressed air is blown into cells


40


selectively until deck


37


of the submersible platform


4


has surfaced, i.e., until it carries the full weight of all floatable containers


12


. From then on, the burden on the floating submersible platform


4


is increased only by the weight of its emerging structure. As this is symmetrical, the resulting burden is symmetrical. Thus, the air cushions inside submersible platform


4


are increased uniformly until it floats at the required freeboard.




When ship


100


re-emerges to voyage draft, submersible platform


4


is engaged by supports at the transverse trusses


5


and lifted from the water. While the weight of submersible platform


4


is being transferred progressively to transverse trusses


5


, its air cushions are correspondingly unburdened. Thus, the air cushions are decompressed, and the water level inside cells


40


drops gradually as long as the bottom edges of submersible platform


4


remain immersed. Hence, in cells


40


containing only a small air cushion, negative pressure can occur, i.e., when the submersible platform


4


is lifted by hulls


1


and


1


′, such cells


40


act like siphons and suck in water. Of course, the air cushions in hull tanks


16


are sufficiently buoyant to lift the added load. But when a submersible platform


4


has sucked in water and this is released instantaneously with the bottom edge of its margin plating surfaces


52


, destructive water hammer may occur. In a submersible platform


4


being lifted by ship


100


, water hammer is prevented by opening check valve


48


in vent lines


47


of these cells


40


when their (calculated) internal pressure is about equal to atmospheric pressure so that from then on ambient air flows freely into these cells


40


.




Conversely, when a submersible platform


4


is lifted up by emerging ship


100


and its cells


40


contain air cushions that completely fill them when submerged to maximal depth, cells


40


will blow off air because the expanding air cushion's volume exceeds the volume of cell


40


. Such excess air is blown off freely along the bottom edge of margin plating


52


. Countermeasures to prevent this phenomenon are not required.




The above description explains the process of a submersible platform


4


submerging and re-emerging for the exchange of floatable containers


12


. However, ship


100


does not always exchange floatable containers


12


on all of its submersible platforms


4


.




In a submersible platform


4


which is not to be submerged for exchanging floatable containers


12


, check valves


48


for venting this submersible platform


4


are opened before ship


100


immerses from voyage draft to loading draft, so that no air is captured inside its cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ when it sinks into the water with the immersing ship


100


. Such a vented submersible platform


4


will not become waterborne but remain on its supports at the transverse trusses


5


when ship


100


is at loading draft. In this position, submersible platform


4


only displaces water equivalent to the volume of its components that submerge when ship


100


immerses. This volume is negligibly small so that in cargo space


24


in which the submersible platform


4


does not become waterborne, buoyancy need not be transferred from hull tanks


1


and


1


′ to cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″.




The conditions described above for submersible platforms


4


similarly apply to immersing or re-emerging hulls


1


and


1


′. For instance, when lifting floating submersible platform


4


out of the water, hulls


1


and


1


′ are burdened asymmetrically transversal to their longitudinal axis. As shown above, the submersible platforms


4


are level when they float at the programmed freeboard on appropriately sized air cushions. However, when the submersible platform


4


are lifted out of the water by ship


100


, the water surface inside cells


40


below the air cushion recedes and the air cushion's internal pressure and buoyancy are reduced. Generally, these air cushions are of different sizes and arranged asymmetrically to suit the weight of floatable containers


12


. As emerging ship


100


lifts the submersible platforms


4


in level position, the air cushions expand uniformly so that the original asymmetry of the load is restored and affects hulls


1


and


1


′, i.e., they are unburdened asymmetrically. This asymmetrical unburdening of hulls


1


and


1


′ is counterbalanced by selectively injecting air into individual hull tanks


16


. As the loads on individual submersible platforms


4


generally differ, hulls


1


and


1


′ are also burdened asymmetrically in longitudinal direction. Correspondingly, throughout all phases of immersion or re-emergence, hulls


1


and


1


′ are held in level position by selectively venting or injection air hull tanks


16


.




The phases of ship


100


immersing to loading draft and re-emerging to voyage draft are described in detail below. Since data for controlling draft and level position of the immersing ship


100


are obtained when it re-emerges with newly loaded floatable containers, the latter case is presented first.




Rising from Loading Draft to Voyage Draft




Ship


100


is at loading draft for the exchange of floatable containers


12


. Submersible platforms


4


are deeply submerged and rest on hulls


1


and


1


′. Above them, several floatable containers


12


of different length, breadth and draft are moored to transverse trusses


5


. They are arranged between adjacent transverse trusses


5


towards burdening submersible platforms


4


as nearly symmetrically as possible when afloat and carry floatable containers


12


.




Forebody


19


and afterbody


15


float on the buoyancy of their hulls. Forecastle


6


and poop


7


are waterborne and primarily stabilize ship


100


in the direction of its longitudinal and transversal axes.




Phase A1




Ship


100


floats at loading draft on air cushions in hull tanks


16


, in forebody


19


and in afterbody


15


. Submersible platforms


4


rest fully submerged on hulls


1


and


1


′.




Hull Tanks


16






Check valves


32


of piping systems


31


for injecting air and check valves


34


of piping systems


33


for venting hull tanks


16


are closed, shut-off valves


30


in the bottoms of hull tanks


16


are open. Hull tanks


16


contain air cushions above the surface of water ballast that had been taken in when ship


100


immersed.




Submersible Platforms


4






Fully submerged, submersible platform


4


rest with two supports on each of hulls


1


and


1


′. Check valves


44


of piping systems


43


for injecting compressed air and check valves


48


of piping systems


47


for venting submersible platforms


4


are closed. Cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ in submersible platforms


4


contain residual air whose total buoyancy is smaller than the weight of the submersible platform


4


.




Phase A2




Ship


100


floats at loading draft on air cushions in hull tanks


16


, in forebody


19


and in afterbody


15


. Compressed air is blown into submersible platforms


4


so that they rise. This phase ends when each of submersible platforms


4


contacts the bottom of the first of floatable containers


12


floating above it.




Hull Tanks


16






The state of hull tanks


16


remains constant throughout this phase.




Submersible Platforms


4






Check valves


44


of piping systems


43


are opened so that compressed air flows uniformly into cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ of submersible platform


4


. When the buoyancy of the air cushions in its cells exceeds the weight of submersible platform


4


, it rises in level position until deck


37


contacts the bottom of the floatable container


12


with the deepest draft.




Phase A3




Ship


100


floats at loading draft on air cushions in hull tanks


16


, in forebody


19


and in afterbody


15


. Submersible platforms


4


continue to rise until they carry all floatable containers


12


. Injecting compressed air is continued until, at the end of this phase, decks


37


of submersible platforms


4


are even with the water surface.




Hull Tanks


16






The state of hull tanks


16


remains constant throughout this phase.




Submersible Platforms


4






For compensating the asymmetrical burden on submersible platforms


4


, check valves


44


of piping systems


43


are set for selectively blowing compressed air into cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″,


40


′″.




While submersible platforms


4


rise, the level position parallel to their longitudinal and transversal axes is monitored by pressure sensors


65


,


65


′,


66


and


66


′ at margin plating


52


which continuously compare planned vs. actual draft. If submersible platforms


4


deviate from the level position, the flow of compressed air into cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ located at the perimeter of submersible platform


4


is decreased or increased as required for neutralizing the deviation.




Phase A4




Ship


100


floats at loading draft on air cushions in hull tanks


16


, in forebody


19


and in afterbody


15


. Submersible platforms


4


rise above the water surface


21


at loading draft until, at the end of this phase, they are waterborne at the programmed freeboard, at which point support rails


58


are extended from transverse trusses


5


.




Hull Tanks


16






The state of hull tanks


16


remains constant throughout this phase.




Submersible Platforms


4






Decks


37


of submersible platforms


4


are level with the water surface


21


and carry all floatable containers


12


. When rising higher, their burden on submersible platforms


4


is no longer increased asymmetrically. Thus, check valves


44


of piping systems


43


are set for increasing the air cushions inside cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ uniformly until submersible platforms


4


float at the programmed freeboard.




The transversal and longitudinal level position of submersible platforms


4


is being monitored throughout this phase. When submersible platforms


4


attain the programmed freeboard, the supply of compressed air is shut off by check valves


44


of piping systems


43


.




In this position, tilting support rails


58


are extended from transverse trusses


5


, as shown and discussed in

FIG. 7

, so that top rails


59


butt against margin plating


52


of submersible platform


4


so that they engage its bearing bars


60


when ship


100


subsequently re-emerges to voyage draft.




Phase A5




Submersible platforms


4


are waterborne at the programmed freeboard. Ship


100


begins to re-emerge, lifting submersible platforms


4


until, at the end of this phase, the bottom edge of their margin plating


52


breaks the water surface so that the air cushions in cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ escape and the weight of all submersible platforms


4


is borne by hulls


1


and


1


′.




Hull Tanks


16






For re-emerging from loading draft to voyage draft, check valves


32


of piping systems


31


are opened and compressed air is injected into hull tanks


16


.




After ship


100


has risen fractions of a meter above the water surface at loading draft


21


, top rails


59


having been extended from transverse trusses


5


touch bearing bars


60


of the submersible platforms


4


. While ship


100


continues to re-emerge, the weight of submersible platforms


4


is gradually transferred via bearing rail


57


to transverse trusses


5


. As ship


100


had floated in level position when at loading draft, and as the added buoyancy for re-emerging must be distributed symmetrically, air cushions of uniform thickness are blown into hull tanks


16


up to this point.




Ship


100


continues to re-emerge and the bottom edge of submersible platforms


4


breaks the surface. At this point, the air cushions in cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ escape into the atmosphere and the full weight of the submersible platforms


4


is borne by hulls


1


and


1


′. Without the buoyancy contributed by air cushions that had been blown selectively into cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ for counterbalancing the asymmetrical burden of floatable containers


12


, the burden transferred from submersible platform


4


to hulls


1


and


1


′ is asymmetrical. Accordingly, compressed air is blown selectively into hull tanks


16


from this point on.




Submersible Platforms


4






While ship


100


continues to re-emerge, submersible platforms


4


are lifted progressively out of the water. Their weight is gradually transferred to ship


100


, and the air cushions inside expand. If submersible platforms


4


have risen so far that the pressure of the air cushion inside one of the cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″, as calculated, has dropped to atmospheric pressure, check valves


48


of piping systems


47


for venting are opened so that ambient air flows freely into this cell and no negative pressure builds up when submersible platform


4


is lifted higher out of the water by re-emerging ship


100


.




Forebody


19


and Afterbody


15






While ship


100


is re-emerging, water is pumped from ballast tanks in forebody


19


and afterbody


15


according to a separate control system, so that the system for regulating draft and level position of hulls


1


and


1


′ and submersible platforms


4


in cargo spaces


24


is not affected by the buoyancy of forebody


19


and afterbody


15


. However, all ballast systems of ship


100


permit controlled deviation from this procedure, i.e., ship


100


can also re-emerge from loading draft to voyage draft by first decreasing draft of forebody


19


and subsequently bringing up afterbody


15


, or conversely, immerse in the corresponding manner.




Phase A6




Ship


100


continues to re-emerge until, at the end of this phase, it is at voyage draft and submersible platforms


4


, forecastle


6


and poop


7


are several meters above water.




Hull Tanks


16






Compressed air is continued to be blown selectively into hull tanks


16


. Shortly before ship


100


attains voyage draft, check valves


32


of piping systems


31


are gradually closed and progressively shut down the flow of compressed air into hull tanks


16


so that ship


100


does not overshoot voyage draft. When ship


100


is at voyage draft, shut-off valves


30


in the bottom of hull tanks


16


are closed automatically.




Submersible Platforms


4






Submersible platforms


4


rest with bearing bars


60


on top rails


59


which transfer their weight through support rails


58


and bearing rails


57


to transverse trusses


5


, as shown and discussed in FIG.


7


.




At the end of this phase, ship


100


is at voyage draft, ready to continue its voyage.




Immersing from Voyage Draft to Loading Draft




Preparatory to ship


100


immersing to loading draft, check valves


48


of piping systems


47


for venting are opened in those submersible platforms


4


which are not to be submerged for exchanging floatable containers


12


. Hence, these submersible platforms


4


do not capture an air cushion when they sink into the water with immersing ship


100


. When ship


100


is at loading draft, these submersible platforms


4


rest on their supports at transverse trusses


5


with their decks


37


above the water surface.




In those submersible platforms


4


which are to be submerged for the exchange of floatable containers


12


, check valves


48


of piping systems


47


for venting are closed prior to immersion of ship


100


. The following description applies exclusively to those submersible platforms


4


which are to be submerged.




Preparations for immersion are wrapped up by checking air pressure inside hull tanks


16


. If lower than recorded at the end of the preceding immersion, original pressure is restored by injecting compressed air. Finally, shut-off valves


30


in the bottom of hull tanks


16


are opened.




Phase B1




Ship


100


is at voyage draft, shut-off valves


30


in hull tanks


16


are open. Submersible platforms


4


, forecastle


6


and poop


7


sit several meters above water.




Hull Tanks


16






Ship


100


floats on air cushions in hull tanks


16


which carry its weight and that of all floatable containers


12


on submersible platforms


4


. Below the air cushions, hull tanks


16


contain water. In a cargo space


24


with a submersible platform


4


laden to full capacity, air cushions in hull tanks


16


are large and the residual volume of water is small, whereas in a cargo space


24


with a lightly laden submersible platform


4


the ratio of air vs. water is reversed.




Submersible Platforms


4






With check valves


48


of piping system


47


closed, submersible platforms


4


sit above water surface


20


at voyage draft.




Forebody


19


and Afterbody


15






Forecastle


6


and poop


7


sit above water surface


20


at voyage draft.




Phase B2




Ship


100


begins to immerse, and submersible platforms


4


, forecastle


6


and poop


7


go down with it. At the end of this phase, ship


100


is immersed so far that the lower edges of submersible platforms


4


and the bottoms of forecastle


6


and poop


7


contact the water surface.




Hull Tanks


16






Below those submersible platforms


4


which are to be submerged, check valves


34


of piping systems


33


are set for venting hull tanks


16


uniformly so that hulls


1


and


1


′ remain in level position while immersing.




Submersible Platforms


4






With check valves


48


of piping systems


47


for venting closed, submersible platforms


4


rest on transverse trusses


5


. As ship


100


immerses, submersible platforms


4


sink lower with it until the volume encompassed by deck


37


and margin plating


52


is closed off at the bottom by the water surface.




Forebody


19


and Afterbody


15






By flooding ballast tanks


16


and


16


′, the buoyancy of forebody


19


and afterbody


15


is adjusted in such manner that they do not affect the system that controls the immersion of hulls


1


and


1


′ in cargo spaces


24


while ship


100


immerses.




Phase B3




While ship


100


continues to immerse, the undersides of submersible platforms


4


and the bottoms of forecastle


6


and poop


7


sink below the water surface. Thus, air cushions are built up inside submersible platforms


4


. At the end of this phase, ship


100


is at loading draft and submersible platforms


4


are waterborne at there programmed freeboard.




Hull Tanks


16






Hulls


1


and


1


′ continue to be vented and immerse deeper. As water pressure rises with depth, internal pressure of the air cushions in hull tanks


16


rises and their volume decreases.




Check valves


34


of piping systems


33


are set for venting hull tanks


16


selectively, as during this phase the buoyancy of submersible platforms


4


increases which reduces the load borne by hulls


1


and


1


′ asymmetrically. Asymmetrical loading parallel to the longitudinal axis of ship


100


results from differences in the total weights of submersible platforms


4


, transversal thereto from the asymmetrical arrangement of floatable containers


12


on submersible platforms


4


.




In order to allow for the inertia of the (large) check valves


34


of piping system


33


, venting of hull tanks


16


is gradually decreased and, thus, the rate of immersion of ship


100


is progressively retarded in order to slowly approach and not undershoot loading draft. When ship


100


attains loading draft, check valves


34


of piping system


33


are closed automatically.




Submersible Platforms


4






As submersible platforms


4


sink lower with ship


100


, the bottom edge of their margin plating


52


submerges. With check valves


48


of piping systems


47


closed, (meager) air cushions are built up in them. Check valves


48


of piping systems


47


, or check valves


44


of piping systems


43


respectively, are set for venting or injecting air selectively, as required for submersible platforms


4


to float at programmed freeboard when ship


100


is at loading draft.




Forebody


19


and Afterbody


15






The lowest watertight deck


22


in forecastle


6


and the lowest watertight deck


25


in poop


7


are level with the water surface at loading draft


21


and stabilize immersed ship


100


.




Phase B4




Ship


100


is at loading draft. While submersible platforms


4


submerge, floatable containers


12


on their decks


37


immerse and become waterborne one after another. This phase ends when the first floatable containers


12


float off decks


37


of submersible platforms


4


while the latter continue to sink.




Hull Tanks


16






The state of hull tanks


16


remains constant throughout this phase.




Submersible Platforms


4






Prior to submerging, submersible platforms


4


float at programmed freeboard. Their bearing bars


60


are above top rails


59


at transverse trusses


5


. After top rails


59


have been retracted by actuators


61


as described in context with

FIG. 7

, the clear opening between top rails


59


is wide enough for the immersing submersible platform


4


to pass through.




Check valves


48


of piping systems


47


are set for venting cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ of submersible platforms


4


. While they submerge deeper, their level position is maintained by uniform venting. As soon as their deck


37


is awash, floatable containers


12


on top begin to immerse and gain buoyancy. Due to generally being arranged asymmetrically, the immersing floatable containers


12


unburden submersible platforms


4


asymmetrically. Accordingly, check valves


48


of piping systems


47


are set for venting submersible platforms


4


selectively so that they continue to submerge in level position until on each of them the floatable container


12


with the deepest draft as the last one lifts off deck


37


.




Forebody


19


and Afterbody


15






The state of forebody


19


and afterbody


15


remains constant throughout this phase.




Phase B5




Ship


100


is at loading draft. Submersible platforms


4


have submerged to a depth at which all floatable containers


12


are waterborne while the unburdened submersible platforms


4


continue to sink deeper. This phase ends when, in their deep position, submersible platforms


4


rest on top of hulls


1


and


1


′.




Hull Tanks


16






During this phase, the position of hull tanks


16


remains constant until submersible platforms


4


are seated on hulls


1


and


1


′ and the latter carry their weight. This weight is borne by hulls


1


and


1


′ in their full length between forebody


19


and afterbody


15


. Because of the large volume of hulls


1


and


1


′, the relatively small residual weight of submersible platforms


4


causes hulls


1


and


1


′ to sink very slightly below the programmed loading draft, which is tolerated without correction.




Submersible Platforms


4






After the last floatable container


12


has floated up from deck


37


, submersible platforms


4


are continued to be vented and submerge deeper. Due to the symmetrical load of their structural weight, check valves


48


of piping systems


47


are set for venting air cushions in cells


40


,


40


′,


40


″ and


40


′″ uniformly in order to maintain the level position of submersible platforms


4


until they land on hulls


1


and


1


′.




At a programmed distance before submersible platforms


4


land on hulls


1


and


1


′, check valves


48


of piping systems


47


are gradually closed and progressively reduce venting for a soft landing of submersible platforms


4


on hulls


1


and


1


′ in spite of the inevitable inertia of the (large) valves. Check valves


48


of piping systems


47


are closed automatically when, with a residual volume of air inside, submersible platforms


4


rest on hulls


1


and


1


′. This residual air cushion is programmed to reduce the burden on hulls


1


and


1


′ imposed by submersible platforms


4


to less than their structural weight.




Forebody


19


and Afterbody


15






Due to being burdened by submersible platforms


4


, hulls


1


and


1


′ in forebody


19


and afterbody


15


are immersed slightly below loading draft. However, this negligibly small deviation is not corrected.




At the end of this phase, ship


100


is ready for the exchange of waterborne floatable containers


12


against other ones.




It will be apparent from the foregoing description that the present invention provides a new method and apparatus for loading and unloading cargo from a twin-hull ship that is particularly effective in short-sea transport. While a specific embodiment of providing the venting or insertion of air has been provided, countless variations may be utilized. For instance, it is foreseen that the same valves could be used for both inserting and venting air into the hull tanks and under the submersible platforms. Moreover, varying numbers of submersible platforms and respective transverse trusses are possible.




While there has been shown and described what is presently considered to be the preferred embodiment of this invention, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the broader aspects of this invention. For instance, although the invention has been described in conjunction with a TSL, it is equally applicable to other types of other multi-hull ships. Moreover, although the submersible platforms that have been shown are advantageously open on both ends to permit simultaneous loading and unloading, it is feasible that the submersible platforms could have only one open end.




It is, therefore, aimed in the appended claims to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the true scope and spirit of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method of loading cargo packed in at least one floatable container onto a seaworthy vessel comprising:(i) first and second substantially parallel hulls which lie beneath the water surface; (ii) first and second hull tanks for regulating the draft and horizontal position of said vessel wherein when said hull tanks are substantially filled with water said vessel is at a loading draft and when said hull tanks are substantially filled with air said vessel is at voyage draft; (iii) a generally horizontal submersible platform; (iv) a bearing bar projecting from said platform; (v) a transverse truss coupled between said first and second hulls and generally perpendicular to said platform; (vi) a support rail on said transverse truss for engaging said bearing bar and supporting said platform; (vii) an air cell, subdivided longitudinally and transversely, beneath said platform; (viii) a first air compressor; (ix) first piping means for injecting air from said first air compressor into said air cell; (x) a first valve which regulates the flow of air from said first air compressor into said air cell; (xi) first vent piping means for ejecting air from said air cell; (xii) a second valve which regulates the venting of air from said air cell; (xiii) a second air compressor; (xiv) second piping means for injecting air from said second air compressor into said hull tanks; (xv) a third valve which regulates the flow of air from said second air compressor into said hull tanks; (xvi) second vent piping means for ejecting air from said hull tanks; (xvii) a fourth valve which regulates the venting of air from said hull tanks; (xviii) a first plurality of sensors mounted on said platform providing feed-back on depth of immersion and horizontal position of said platform to said central processor; (xix) a second plurality of sensors mounted on said hulls providing feed-back on depth of immersion and horizontal position of said hulls to said central processor; and (xx) a central processor including calculated flow rates for setting said first and third valves which regulate the flows of compressed air from said air compressors to said air cell and said hull tanks, respectively, and the calculated flow rates for said second and fourth valves which regulate the flows of air vented from said air cell and said hull tanks, respectively, wherein said method comprises the steps of: (a) submersing said platform beneath the water surface level wherein said platform is supported on said hulls when said vessel is at said loading draft; (b) floating said cargo above said platform; (c) injecting air from said first air compressor through said first piping means at a first calculated flow rate by said first valve until said platform first engages said cargo; (d) injecting air from said first air compressor through said first piping means at a second calculated flow rate by said first valve until said platform rises until it is at water level; (e) injecting air from said first air compressor through said first piping means at a third calculated flow rate by said first valve until platform is at a programmed freeboard level; (f) extending said support rail to engage said bearing bar; and (g) injecting air from said second air compressor through said second piping means until said vessel is at voyage draft.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said first calculated flow rate of injected air, said second calculated flow rate of injected air, and said third calculated flow rate of injected air are the same.
  • 3. A method of discharging cargo packed in at least one floatable container from a seaworthy vessel comprising:(i) first and second substantially parallel hulls which lie beneath the water surface; (ii) first and second hull tanks for regulating the draft and horizontal position of said vessel wherein when said hull tanks are substantially filled with water said vessel is at a loading draft and when said hull tanks are substantially filled with air said vessel is at voyage draft; (iii) a generally horizontal submersible platform; (iv) a bearing bar projecting from said platform; (v) a transverse truss coupled between said first and second hulls and generally perpendicular to said platform; (vi) a support rail on said transverse truss for engaging said bearing bar and supporting said platform; (vii) an air cell, subdivided longitudinally and transversely, beneath said platform; (viii) a first air compressor; (ix) first piping means for injecting air from said first air compressor into said air cell; (x) a first valve which regulates the flow of air from said first air compressor into said air cell; (xi) first vent piping means for ejecting air from said air cell; (xii) a second valve which regulates the venting of air from said air cell; (xiii) a second air compressor; (xiv) second piping means for injecting air from said second air compressor into said hull tanks; (xv) a third valve which regulates the flow of air from said second air compressor into said hull tanks; (xvi) second vent piping means for ejecting air from said hull tanks; (xvii) a fourth valve which regulates the venting of air from said hull tanks; (xviii) a first plurality of sensors mounted on said platform providing feed-back on depth of immersion and horizontal position of said platform to said central processor; (xix) a second plurality of sensors mounted on said hulls providing feed-back on depth of immersion and horizontal position of said hulls to said central processor; and (xx) a central processor including calculated flow rates for setting said first and third valves which regulate the flows of compressed air from said air compressors to said air cell and said hull tanks, respectively, and the calculated flow rates for said second and fourth valves which regulate the flows of air vented from said air cell and said hull tanks, respectively, wherein said method comprises the steps of: (a) venting air at a first calculated rate from said first and second hull tanks through said second piping means enabling tanks to flood with water until said vessel is at a level wherein said platform contacts the water surface; (b) venting air at a second calculated rate from said first and second hull tanks through said second piping means enabling tanks to flood with water until said vessel is at a level wherein said platform is at a programmed freeboard level; (c) retracting said support rail to disengage from said bearing bar; (d) venting air at a third calculated rate from said first and second hull tanks through said second piping means enabling tanks to flood with water until said vessel is at loading draft; (e) venting air from said air cell through said first piping means until said platform is supported on said hulls and said cargo is freely floating; and (f) removing said cargo.
  • 4. The method of claim 3 wherein said first calculated rate of venting air, said second calculated rate of venting air, and said third calculated rate of venting air are the same.
US Referenced Citations (2)
Number Name Date Kind
3939790 Varges et al. Feb 1976 A
4147123 Kirby et al. Apr 1979 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
42 29 706 Mar 1994 DE
Non-Patent Literature Citations (1)
Entry
Trail Reports in Transportation Planning No. R99/01 The Netherlands Trail Research School (1999).