Many prior art horizontal grinders have traditionally had a feed system including a feed roller and a feed table. The feed roller has typically been mounted on a pivoting frame to ride up onto material being fed into a grinding chamber while the feed table moved the material from below. The feed table of a horizontal grinder is typically in excess of 6 feet wide to allow convenient handling of the materials typically processed by a horizontal grinder.
The feed roller is typically constructed to fit into the infeed of the grinder, to fit relatively closely to vertical side walls of the infeed, to minimize the probability of material getting lodged between the feed roller and the side wall. The roller is often subjected to uneven load conditions due to the variations in the position of the materials entering the grinder. There is seldom an equal distribution of material below the feed roller. This uneven load creates the tendency to tilt the feed roller. If allowed to tilt, the feed roller would become wedged between the infeed side walls. This potential problem has traditionally been averted by designing the pivoting frame to have sufficient rigidity to control the alignment of the feed roller.
Prior art feed roller mounting systems have traditionally included the pivoting frame, and also a hydraulic system with a control valve and a pair of hydraulic cylinders, called lift cylinders, to control the position of the feed roller to lift the feed roller to allow material to more easily pass under, or to lower the feed roller into contact with the material to allow the feed roller to engage and assist with the material feeding.
When the hydraulic system lowers the feed roller into contact with the material, a down-force is applied onto the material. This down-force is a combination of the weight of the feed roller and its positioning mechanism and the down force generated by the hydraulic cylinders. The hydraulic systems have traditionally been designed using identical cylinders, one on the left side, and one on the right side of the grinder, both attached to the feed roller linkage. The hydraulic system was designed with the two butt-end ports of the cylinders merged, and the two rod-end ports merged to form a parallel arrangement. The control valve directed the hydraulic fluid to both cylinders which resulted in approximately equal pressures applied to each cylinder. Since the cylinders are identical, an approximately equal force was applied on each side of the feed roller lift linkage.
In the operating mode where the feed roller is lowered into contact with the material, the amount of pressure applied to the cylinders can be controlled by the operator. In such a system, when the pressure is low, the force generated by the cylinders may have negligible effect, wherein the weight of the feed roller and feed roller mechanism may provide most of the down-force on the material. In this mode when the feed roller encounters material that is not evenly distributed, such as an uneven pile of material, or when a log is located off to one side, the pivoting frame is subjected to bending due to the fact that the center of gravity of the roller and frame mechanism is offset from the reaction point, the point where the material being ground contacts the bottom of the roller. This is a common occurrence, and as a result the frame of a traditional grinder is designed to be rigid enough to keep the feed roller approximately parallel to the table.
To accomplish this rigid construction the frame mechanism for the feed roller has typically included a component capable of carrying the torque generated by the offset load. Typically the frame would flex to some degree, as required for the torque-carrying component to be loaded, to accommodate this offset load. The mechanism was typically designed to minimize the amount of flex to attempt to keep the feed roller generally parallel to the feed table. When the pressure is low the lift cylinders do not add significantly to this flexing, but they do not reduce the bending load applied to the frame as a result of material offset. Thus the pivoting frame carrying the feed roller has traditionally been designed to resist this bending load.
In a different operating mode, the lift cylinders exert down pressure on the material in order to increase the down-force to cause the feed roller to more aggressively force the material into the grinder hammer mill. With the down-force increased, the potential bending forces on the feed roller frame are increased. With the typical known hydraulic system, where the two cylinders are each supplied with a source of hydraulic fluid, the load generated by the cylinders adds to the bending stresses applied to the roller frame. This has resulted in the typical feed roller mounting structure being relatively significant, large, heavy and expensive.
Accordingly there is a need for a method and apparatus to ensure that the axis of a feed roller remains essentially parallel to the infeed floor throughout its range of motion, even when influenced by uneven or offset loading of material on the floor, but without the need to use a large, heavy, and expensive feed roller mounting structure.
The present invention is an infeed system for a horizontal grinder intended to process loose, unconsolidated materials. The infeed includes a feed table with a chain conveyor on a floor and sides to support the material to be processed. The infeed system further includes an upper feed roller configured for powered rotation so that the outer surface moves in coordination with the chain conveyor to move material to a grinding chamber. The feed roller is positioned between the sides to minimize the potential for materials to become wedged or trapped. A major advantage of this infeed system is the incorporation of a hydraulic circuit and control system to control the position or orientation of the feed roller to keep it parallel to the feed table. The preferred embodiment utilizes a master/slave cylinder arrangement in combination with a linkage that controls the position of the ends of the feed roller. The master/slave cylinder arrangement resists the flexing motion associated with offset loading that inconsistent materials generate.
The design uses a master-slave cylinder arrangement.
The feed roller can be maintained in an orientation parallel to the feed table, or, with its axis of rotation perpendicular to the sides, by also using a pivoting linkage to support the feed roller.
The hydraulic circuit is plumbed in a way that the right cylinder is known as the master cylinder, and the left cylinder is the slave cylinder when the feed roller is controlled to provide a crushing force onto the material being processed. The relationship is also reversed at times wherein the left cylinder becomes the master, with the right being the slave, when the feed roller is raised.
The infeed system of this invention includes the mechanism that supports the feed roller. One of the primary benefits of the invention is the ability to reduce the weight and complexity of the feed roller positioning linkage. The preferred embodiment shown utilizes a pivoting frame, with a left pivot and right pivot arm that are connected by a cross-member that primarily serves as a shield or deflector. But other ways to support the feed roller can also be used, one such alternative being disclosed herein.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding elements throughout the several views,
It is to be understood that in general the present invention is an infeed system for a horizontal grinder intended to process loose, unconsolidated materials. The infeed includes a feed table 2 with a chain conveyor 10 on a floor, and sides to support the material to be processed. The infeed system further includes the upper feed roller 11 configured for powered rotation so that the outer surface moves in coordination with the chain conveyor 10 to move material 70, 71 (
The major advantage of this infeed system is the incorporation of a hydraulic circuit and control system to control the position or orientation of the feed roller to keep it parallel to the feed table. The preferred embodiment utilizes a master/slave cylinder 14/15 arrangement in combination with a linkage that controls the position of the ends of the feed roller. The master/slave cylinder arrangement 14/15 resists the flexing motion associated with offset loading that inconsistent materials generate. The master-slave relationship between the cylinders 14, 15 reverses depending on whether the feed roller 11 is to be forced into the feed material or forced away from the feed material. The design uses a master-slave cylinder arrangement as shown in the schematics shown in
1) The left cylinder 14 is a 3.5″ Dia with a 1.5″ rod
2) The right cylinder 15 is a 3.25″ Dia with a 1.5″ rod
With this combination:
1) As the right cylinder is retracted, it displaces 8.3 cubic inches of oil out of butt-end, per inch of movement, while; 2) The left cylinder requires 7.8 cubic inches of oil into the rod-end, per inch of movement.
With this combination of cylinders 14/15, the feed roller 11 can be maintained in an orientation parallel to the feed table 2, or with its axis of rotation perpendicular to the sides, by also using a pivoting linkage 5, 6, and 7 to support the feed roller 11, wherein the cylinders 14/15 are connected to this pivoting linkage 5, 6, and 7 on separate radii R1 and R2 as shown in
The hydraulic circuit shown in
The radii R1/R2 could be identical if the correct cylinder size could be implemented, as would be possible if a perfectly matched pair of cylinders was utilized. This slight difference in radius is not detrimental to performance. Since the loading on the feed roller 11 is not balanced, the load on the right cylinder 14 will most often be different that the load on the left cylinder 15. With this master/slave cylinder arrangement in crush mode (
With a master/slave cylinder arrangement 14/15 of this type, the oil contained in the circuit that includes the butt-end 14b of the right cylinder 14, the hose 66 between the cylinders 14/15 and the rod-end 15r of the left cylinder 15 is trapped. This oil does not circulate through the rest of the circuit, and it is a fixed volume of oil. The seals with the cylinders 14/15 will leak to some extent, which is known to affect this volume of oil, which will affect the positioning of the feed roller. This potential problem is alleviated by use of valves (not shown) built into the pistons of the cylinders that allow the pressure to equalize when the feed roller is lowered completely. This valve in the pistons system is well known from other applications of master/slave cylinders so it will not be described in this document.
The hydraulic cylinders 14 and 15 are supplied the hydraulic fluid via supply line 61 and through another control valve 65. In
In
The motor-type flow dividers 1310, 1320 comprise two hydraulic motors, each having a gear on a shared shaft, a single inlet port provides flow to both motors. Each motor has a unique flow outlet. The flow direction may be reversed as can be observed in
Obviously many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described.