The present invention relates to containers for storage of liquids, granular materials and the like, and methods and apparatuses for forming the same. More particularly, the container of the present invention is a single piece blow-molded plastic container formed in a multi-sided configuration with modified corner radii, utilizing a smaller volume of raw material to obtain volumes and strength equivalent to the prior art.
Blow-molded plastic bottles are well known for use for holding a wide variety of liquids such as milk, water and juice. The same types of containers may be used for granular materials. Containers of this type are manufactured in a variety of sizes, conventionally formed of a variety of thermoplastic materials.
Typical of these containers are those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,527,133, issued to McCollum et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,805,793, issued to Brandt et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,237,792, issued to Skolnicki et al.
Containers of this type are relatively thin-walled, and are generally square or rectangular in cross-section, feature a molded handle, and typically have a finished weight of over 60 grams. Such weight of material is essential to maintaining sufficient strength for the container to withstand the industrial filling process, in particular, the loads imposed for securement of a closure, such as a cap, lid or screw top to the spout on the top of the container.
More recently, containers have been created which incorporate ribs and other design features in the upper sidewalls of the container to increase mechanical strength, while at the same time decreasing the wall thickness of the finished container. By reducing the overall thickness of the container, substantial savings in materials cost can be realized. Newer containers utilizing these design methodologies have resulted in reductions in material required for each container, and corresponding reductions in material cost, of between five and seven percent. Such reductions in the typical production environment can result in substantial cost savings over time.
The existing containers, however, suffer from important limitations. Particularly, as known in the prior art, the manufacture of thin-walled thermoplastic containers utilizing the blow-molding techniques can create unacceptably thin wall dimensions near the top and bottom of the containers, where the tops and bottoms of the containers join the side walls. Excessive thinning in these areas weakens the overall container and reduces its ability to withstand the forces typically imposed during the filling process. To insure that sufficient wall thickness remains in these vital sections, the current containers require a minimum of approximately fifty-eight to sixty grams in weight. A need exists, therefore, for a container design and method of manufacture, which permits more even distribution of thermoplastic material throughout the wall of the container, while allowing significant reductions in the amount of material required to produce the container.
In summary, a thin-walled container in accordance with the present invention is formed having sidewalls, a bottom, a top having a neck, a handle, and a spout. The container has eight sides, and a smoothly tapered radius between the spout and the sidewall. To form the container, specialized round tooling is utilized in the die and its associated mandrel to achieve more even distribution of the thermoplastic material during the molding process. The resulting container displays a more efficient distribution of the materials along the sidewalls, top and bottom of the container, typically at a weight of fifty-two grams or less.
It is an object of the present invention, therefore, to provide a thin-walled container having an extremely light weight. Further, it is an object of the present invention to provide a thin-walled container having six or more sides and a specially radiused transition between the spout and sidewall of the container.
It is another object of the present invention to position the handle of the container to improve venting of the interior of the container during the pouring process.
It is another object of the present invention to provide a system for manufacturing the same volume of container as taught in the prior art, while maintaining the necessary structural integrity of the container to withstand the industrial filling process.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide an improved container having the same volume and fitting in the same standard case as taught in the prior art.
These, and other objects of the invention, will be apparent from the associated drawings and description.
The description which follows will be best appreciated by reference to the accompanying drawings. Although the invention is described in conjunction with the drawings, and a plurality of preferred embodiments is described, it will be appreciated that these descriptions are not intended to limit the invention to those embodiments. The invention includes a variety of alternatives, modifications and equivalents which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The invention will be better understood by a full appreciation of the process of manufacture typically used in the art. A conventional blow-molding machine includes a loading station where pelletized thermoplastic material, such as polyethylene, may be introduced into a hopper or feed bin. The hopper, in turn, feeds the pelletized or granular thermoplastic materials, which are at room temperature, to a heater/drive system. Such a system typically includes a screw drive provided with one or more heating mechanisms or elements which gradually raise the temperature of the thermoplastic material to approximately 365° F. Once the material has attained this temperature, the material liquefies and becomes taffy-like in its consistency. The material is then introduced into the mold through a die and mandrel combination, whereby the thermoplastic material is evenly distributed in the mold. The blob of thermoplastic material which forms as it is extruded through the gauged opening between the die and mandrel is called a parison. Once the parison is formed, the mold is closed around the parison, possibly imparting the general shape of the interior of the mold onto the parison. This aids in distributing the material of the parison evenly throughout the interior of the mold when the mold is pressurized. The mold is then pressurized via the blow pin thereby forcing the parison to expand throughout the interior of the walls of the mold and imparting to the material the finished shape of a container. To facilitate the molding process, the mold walls are cooled to approximately 30° to 40° F. to restore the liquefied thermoplastic material to solid state. Once the part has formed, the mold is opened, and the part is removed from the mold.
Turning now to
In a first embodiment, the height of the container 10 as measured from the bottom of the container to the bottom of the spout is approximately 9.231 inches, for a container having a volume of approximately 234 cubic inches, essentially a one-gallon container. In this embodiment, a radius transition 24 is formed between the upper limit of the sidewalls 16, 18 and spout 20. Preferably, the radius R has a dimension of approximately three inches, thereby providing a smooth transition between the sidewalls 16, 18 and spout 20 of the container 10 in comparison to the prior art. This area of transition may include one or more ribs 28 to provide additional strength to the container. The container 10 is blow-molded and includes a single piece thin wall construction. The sidewalls, when viewed from above, form a generally octagonal configuration as seen in top or bottom plan views. The container 10 includes a bottom 14 which is interconnected to the sidewalls 16 and 18 and has a plurality of ribs 30. In one example, the radius transition 24 in between the sidewalls 16, 18 and the spout 20 has a radius of approximately 3″ and a transition section length of about 2.5″ in a container having an overall height of approximately 10″.
A second embodiment of the invention is disclosed in
Turning now to first embodiment of the invention as shown in
Likewise, the intermediate corners 34 and bottom corners 36 are positioned closer than the corresponding transition corners in the prior art, resulting in a more even distribution of the thermoplastic material at those critical locations. As shown in
It will be further appreciated that additional strength may be obtained by multiplying the number of sidewalls as shown in
A further advantage of incorporation of the upper radius transition 24 is the improved pouring characteristics of the container. In a prior art, the sharp transitions between the top of the container and the spout and the upper part of the handle and the top of the container results in periodic difficulty in pouring from the container as liquid blocks movement of the contents of the container away from the handle, causing the contents of the container to pour in spurts, rather than in a continuous stream as air is admitted past the liquid. By utilization of the extended upper radius transition of the present invention, the contents of the container flow easily. In addition, the handle section is designed to be hollow and allow air to escape during pouring due to its proximity to the spout to thereby mitigate splashing as liquid is poured from the container. It is also noted that the curved nature of the upper radius transition between the sidewalls and the spout permits the handle to be attached higher on the container proximate to the spout and have a smaller hole between the handle and the container, thereby improving the pouring characteristics as mentioned above and permitting the container to contain a greater volume of material.
Improved characteristics of containers produced according to embodiments of this invention are due, at least in part, to improvements to the equipment used to produce the containers, in particular the die and mandrel combination and the shape and size of the mold.
In addition to the shape due to the die angle 64 and die gap 66, as shown in
The above-described embodiments have been described in order to allow easy understanding of the present invention and do not limit the present invention. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structure as is permitted under the law.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/889,562, filed on May 8, 2013, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/405,495, filed on Feb. 27, 2012, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,668,101 on Mar. 11, 2014, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/466,588 filed Mar. 23, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3309443 | Scott, Jr. et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3312766 | Stevens | Apr 1967 | A |
D213821 | Platte | Apr 1969 | S |
3608137 | Wilson | Sep 1971 | A |
3640667 | Rupert et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3708082 | Platte | Jan 1973 | A |
3765574 | Urquiza | Oct 1973 | A |
D229670 | Platte | Dec 1973 | S |
D238654 | Platte | Feb 1976 | S |
4016995 | Frazer | Apr 1977 | A |
D256664 | Burrington et al. | Sep 1980 | S |
4372455 | Cochran | Feb 1983 | A |
4735834 | Mozer et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4805793 | Brandt et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4846359 | Baird et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
D311136 | Barker et al. | Oct 1990 | S |
5087406 | Krall et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5112561 | Dickinson | May 1992 | A |
5299710 | Welsch et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5472123 | Jangaard | Dec 1995 | A |
5486333 | Mavridis et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
D391854 | Ankney et al. | Mar 1998 | S |
D392188 | Darr et al. | Mar 1998 | S |
5803290 | Bongiorno | Sep 1998 | A |
5833115 | Eiten | Nov 1998 | A |
D415035 | Ankney et al. | Oct 1999 | S |
6065624 | Steinke | May 2000 | A |
6237792 | Skolnicki et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6270488 | Johnson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6527133 | McCollum et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540956 | Iwamoto et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
D474114 | Vlahakis et al. | May 2003 | S |
D512320 | Haley et al. | Dec 2005 | S |
D515932 | Sinclair et al. | Feb 2006 | S |
D604623 | Baker, III | Nov 2009 | S |
7699171 | Rivera et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
D625193 | Janney et al. | Oct 2010 | S |
D657665 | Rivera et al. | Apr 2012 | S |
8517195 | Glover | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8979524 | Lobbestael | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20010028122 | Narushima et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020166857 | Schwaikert | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030155324 | McCollum et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030234236 | Michalowski | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040164048 | Yourist | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20060096942 | Lane | May 2006 | A1 |
20060255000 | Quintana | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060260971 | Rivera et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070095784 | McNabb et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070221606 | Eiten et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070235905 | Trude et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080217200 | Eiten et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090294400 | Sasaki et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100151163 | Skov | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110056903 | Glover | Mar 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2464386 | Sep 2010 | GB |
2470316 | Nov 2010 | GB |
9203276 | Mar 1992 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150197057 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61466588 | Mar 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13405495 | Feb 2012 | US |
Child | 13889562 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13889562 | May 2013 | US |
Child | 14656787 | US |