The present disclosure relates generally to the manufacture of V-belts. More particularly, the disclosure relates to the manufacture of V-belts using an abrading or grinding apparatus.
This section provides background information related to the present disclosure which is not necessarily prior art.
V-belts find utility in a wide range of applications where it is desired to transmit motive power between rotating shafts. For example, V-belts are widely used in automotive applications. The term “V-belt” derives from the cross-sectional shape of the belt. The V-belt is manufactured to have a pair of inwardly tapered sidewalls that are adapted to fit within the corresponding tapered structure of the pulley onto which the belt is fitted.
V-shaped drive belts have been used in machining, such as manufacturing equipment or mobile vehicles, throughout history. These belts efficiently engage both drive and driver pulleys to transmit torque to various rotatable drive members. Through time, the design of V-belts has changed from simple solid molded constructions to complicated reinforced structures. The reinforced structures, often having reinforcement cords or fibers such as Kevlar®, are typically formed on a mandrel where Kevlar® or other reinforcement fiber is wrapped about a cylinder. Polymer material such as plastic or rubber is then infused into the reinforcement phase and layered up to form a hollow tube.
Various methods are then employed to provide a finished belt having the proper size and shape. These methods include cutting a cylindrical belt from the formed tube to form a belt having a rectangular cross section with a proper width. To form the V-surfaces of the belt, several techniques have been attempted. These include simple cutting knife arrangement and grinding or abrading wheels. Such processing has proven problematic, however. It seems that during cutting or grinding, the reinforcing cord tends to get caught or snagged by the cutting surface and pulled or peeled loose from the body of the belt. When this occurs the belt must be scrapped.
Thus while the inclusion of reinforcement cords yields a stronger belt and overall improved product, the inclusion has led to an undesirable manufacturing difficulties whereby the conventional cutting or grinding process used to form the tapered side walls undesirably peels the reinforcing cord away from the body of the belt, requiring the belt to be scrapped.
This section provides a general summary of the disclosure, and is not a comprehensive disclosure of its full scope or all of its features.
We have devised a new method and apparatus that has virtually eliminated the aforementioned reinforcing cord snagging problem.
We have discovered that a particular configuration of grinding wheel and anvil wheel can produce V-belts without the aforementioned defect of pulling the reinforcing cord out from the body of the belt.
In addition, our apparatus and method produce cleanly abraded V-belts with desirable belt surface properties. The tapered sidewalls of the finished belts are uniformly smooth, with a desirable degree of native rubber or polymeric nap exposed, without any undesirable melting of the sidewall material. Surface finish can be important as uniformly smooth surfaces exposing the natural nap of the rubber or polymer tend to grip better during use. Moreover, our apparatus can do so at significantly higher speeds than were practical with conventional abrading equipment.
A more fully disclosed herein the method and apparatus produces a V-belt by cutting inwardly tapered sidewalls in a continuous belt workpiece. The apparatus includes at least one cutting wheel (two wheels being illustrated in an exemplary embodiment) having a first axis of rotation and having a circumferential cutting surface, the cutting wheel being provided with a first motive system that imparts rotation of the cutting wheel about the first axis. The apparatus further includes a moving anvil system adapted to hold the continuous belt workpiece during V-belt production. The moving anvil system includes an anvil wheel having a second axis of rotation not parallel to the first axis and having a circumferential workpiece gripping surface. The anvil system further includes a second motive system that causes the continuous belt workpiece to follow a U-shaped trajectory around the moving anvil and into the path of the cutting wheel.
The anvil wheel is positioned proximate the cutting wheel such that a portion of the continuous belt workpiece makes contact with the circumferential cutting surface and is thereby cut by the cutting wheel. The circumferential cutting surface and the circumferential gripping surface are mutually disposed such that at the point of contact between workpiece and cutting wheel, the cutting surface and the gripping surface define respective planes that intersect in an acute angle, the acute angle defining an inwardly tapered sidewall of the V-belt being produced.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. The description and specific examples in this summary are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustrative purposes only of selected embodiments and not all possible implementations, and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
a and 5b are detailed plan views showing the belt grinding operation in greater detail;
a, 6b and 6c are schematic views showing the geometries of three different embodiments of the grinding apparatus in accordance with the present disclosure;
a and 9b are detailed plan views showing a prior art belt grinding operation in greater detail;
Example embodiments will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Referring to
The take-up wheel 30 of the moving anvil system is preferably disposed on a repositionable, sliding carriage 38 that allows the take-up wheel to be moved both closer and farther from the anvil wheel. The sliding carriage 38 thus allows the belt 22 to be installed on the respective anvil and take-up wheels and then stretched to tighten, ensuring that the belt is held firmly on the anvil wheel during grinding. The anvil wheel 26 and the take-up wheel 30 may be provided with a roughened gripping surface that will grip the underside of the belt once tension is applied by stretching the belt. The sliding carriage 38 is also adjustably positioned so that the continuous belt workpiece can be positioned into cutting contact with the grinding wheels 36a and 36b.
As seen in
To better understand the grinding apparatus and the method of fabricating V-belts, an explanation of an exemplary V-belt will now be provided in connection with
The V-belt 22 shown in
The belt may be constructed by wrapping polymeric material around a drum to form a first layer. A second layer is formed of tensile cord by wrapping the cord in a spiral pattern the entire length of the first layer. Finally the tensile cord is encased in a third layer of polymeric material which totally encapsulates the tensile cord. The sleeve formed by this process is cured and then sliced into individual blanks having a rectangular cross section. A final grinding operation removes material to form a V-shaped cross section. In accordance with the teachings herein, the grinding apparatus of the present disclosure performs this final grinding operation.
As perhaps best seen in
Grinding Wheel and Anvil Geometries
a, 6b and 6c illustrate different geometry embodiments of the V-belt grinding apparatus and method in accordance with the present disclosure. The geometry embodiment of
In an alternate embodiment shown in
In a third embodiment shown in
The embodiment of
In each of the above embodiments the anvil wheel has a round or circular cross section. The circular nature of the anvil affects the angle of engagement over which the belt workpiece is in position to be ground by the grinding wheel. To see this effect refer to
By comparison, when a flat anvil is used, the depth of cut into the workpiece (also shown as dimension d) corresponds to an engagement distance EF over an angle of θ1 radians. As can be seen by this comparison, the angle of engagement for the round anvil is substantially less than the corresponding angle of engagement for a flat anvil, where the same grinding wheel is used in both cases. Use of the round anvil results in a much more concentrated attack of the workpiece, where the grinding wheel's cutting energy is applied to the belt over a much shorter distance (ER is less than EF) even though the depth of grinding d is the same for both cases.
Comparison with Prior Art Technique
The conventional technique for grinding the belt has been to fabricate a pulley with abrasive side walls and then use that pulley as a tool for grinding. This is shown in
Although not understood in the industry, we have discovered that the cutting force of the conventional pulley-shaped grinding tool was actually peeling or pulling the reinforcing cord out from the body of the belt as illustrated in
By comparison, as seen in
In addition to solving the cord pulling problem, our grinding wheel and anvil geometry provides another significant benefit: an improved finished surface. As shown in
Thus, although the individual cutting elements on the grinding wheel are all traveling in a straight line (from top to bottom in
By way of comparison, refer now to
Thus with each of the disclosed embodiments of
The foregoing description of the embodiments has been provided for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure. Individual elements or features of a particular embodiment are generally not limited to that particular embodiment, but, where applicable, are interchangeable and can be used in a selected embodiment, even if not specifically shown or described. The same may also be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the disclosure, and all such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the disclosure.