The present disclosure relates generally to communication device operations, and more specifically to a method and apparatus for managing operations of a communication device.
The quality of wireless communications between wireless access points such as Wireless Fidelity (WiFi) or cellular base stations and portable mobile devices such as cell phones and laptop computers can depend on many factors. For example, an antenna's performance in a portable device can be impacted by its operating environment. Multiple use cases can exist for radio handsets, which include such conditions as the placement of the handset's antenna next to a user's head, or in the user's pocket or the covering of an antenna with a hand, which can significantly impair wireless device efficiency. Similarly, the quality of wireless communications can be affected by network topology and location of the mobile device.
One embodiment of the present disclosure entails a computer-readable storage medium having computer instructions to establish a communication session with a communication system, identify the communication system from the communication session, select a profile according to the identified communication system, and provision one or more tuning states of a matching network having a tunable reactance according to provisioning information included in the profile, wherein the one or more tuning states of the matching network affects one or more performance parameters of the communication device.
One embodiment of the present disclosure entails a matching network having a tunable reactance circuit coupled to one of a transmitter portion and a receiver portion of a communication device. The tunable reactance circuit can affect one or more performance parameters of the communication device. The tunable reactance circuit can further be provisioned by the communication device according to a profile that describes communication characteristics of a communication system from which the communication device operates.
One embodiment of the present disclosure entails a cellular base station having a controller to transmit a request to a communication device to utilize a profile for provisioning a tunable reactance circuit that affects one or more performance parameters of the communication device.
One embodiment of the present disclosure entails a communication device having a controller to provision a matching network that controls one or more operational characteristics of one of a receiver portion and a transmitter portion of the communication device according to a profile describing one or more characteristics of a communication system from which the communication device operates.
One embodiment of the present disclosure entails a method to tune a tunable reactance circuit in a communication device according to a profile that controls operations of the communication device according to at least one of a transmit power level of a transmitter portion of the communication device and a receive signal strength of a receiver portion of the communication device.
The UI 104 can include a depressible or touch-sensitive keypad 108 with a navigation mechanism such as a roller ball, joystick, mouse, or navigation disk for manipulating operations of the communication device 100. The keypad 108 can be an integral part of a housing assembly of the communication device 100 or an independent device operably coupled thereto by a tethered wireline interface (such as a flex cable) or a wireless interface supporting for example Bluetooth. The keypad 108 can represent a numeric dialing keypad commonly used by phones, and/or a Qwerty keypad with alphanumeric keys. The UI 104 can further include a display 110 such as monochrome or color LCD (Liquid Crystal Display), OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) or other suitable display technology for conveying images to an end user of the communication device 100. In an embodiment where the display 110 is a touch-sensitive display, a portion or all of the keypad 108 can be presented by way of the display.
The power supply 114 can utilize common power management technologies (such as replaceable batteries, supply regulation technologies, and charging system technologies) for supplying energy to the components of the communication device 100 to facilitate portable applications. The controller 106 can utilize computing technologies such as a microprocessor and/or digital signal processor (DSP) with associated storage memory such a Flash, ROM, RAM, SRAM, DRAM or other like technologies.
The tunable capacitors 504-508 can each utilize technology that enables tunability of the capacitance of said component. One embodiment of the tunable capacitors 504-508 can utilize voltage or current tunable dielectric materials such as a composition of barium strontium titanate (BST). An illustration of a BST composition is the Parascan® Tunable Capacitor. In another embodiment, the tunable reactive element 310 can utilize semiconductor varactors. Other present or next generation methods or material compositions that can support a means for a voltage or current tunable reactive element are contemplated by the present disclosure.
The DC-to-DC converter 304 can receive a power signal such as 3 Volts from the power supply 114 of the communication device 100 in
In another embodiment, the tunable matching network 202 can comprise a control circuit 402 in the form of a decoder and a tunable reactive element 404 comprising switchable reactive elements such as shown in
The tunability of the tunable matching networks 202, 204 provides the controller 106 a means to optimize performance parameters of the transceiver 102 such as, for example, but not limited to, transmitter power, transmitter efficiency, receiver sensitivity, power consumption of the communication device, a specific absorption rate (SAR) of energy by a human body, frequency band performance parameters, and so on. To achieve one or more desirable performance characteristics which a designer can define, the communication device 100 can be placed in an anechoic chamber 706 such as depicted by
Additionally, the calibration measurements can be performed under a number of use cases of the communication device 100 utilizing a phantom body that emulates the composition of a human body. For instance, a communication device 100 having a housing assembly of a flip design, the communication device 100 can be placed next to an ear of the phantom when the flip is open to emulate a typical conversational use case. In a hands-free application such when a user utilizes a Bluetooth headset or when the communication device 100 is in standby mode, the communication device 100 can be placed on a hip of the phantom with the flip closed. Calibration can be performed on other use cases such as antenna up, or down, speakerphone feature “ON” with communication device 100 held with a phantom hand but away from the phantom head. Any number of use cases can be applied to each frequency band and sub-band if desirable.
As depicted in
Step 802, however, can be adapted to perform a subset of the possible tuning states of the DACs 306. For example, the computer 702 can be adapted to perform calibration measurements for five tuning states of each DAC. Under these constraints, the calibration measurements can be limited to 125 (5*5*5) calibration measurements for each performance parameter of interest. If one includes 4 bands and 3 use cases, then the total calibration measurements can amount to 1500 measurements, which is obviously substantially less than a full sweep of calibration measurements.
For illustration purposes only, the tuning matching network 202 as depicted in
In step 804, the computer 702 can be adapted to apply a common mathematical fitting function g(v1, v2, . . . ) to model system performance for the portion of tuning states not included in the subset of step 802. The fitting function can also reduce inaccuracies in the RSSI data. The fitting function can be a 3rd or 4th order function that utilizes a common regression algorithm to interpolate between the actual measurements derived from step 802. For illustration purposes, what follows is a sample 3rd order fitting function:
c1+c2x+c3y+c4x2+c5y2+c6xy+c7xy2+c8x2y+c9x3+c10y3
Constants c1-c10 can be adapted through an iterative process to perform a third order fitting function. Other fitting functions are contemplated by the present disclosure.
Once the data sets for each performance parameter (e.g., RX sensitivity, TX power, etc.) have been fitted in step 804 over the entire tuning states of DACs 1 and 2, the computer 702 can be adapted with computer software to proceed to step 806 where it can present the designer of the communication device 100 options to define desired figures of merit (FOMs) which can be used to determine tuning states that provide optimal solutions for the desired FOMs. An FOM can represent, for example, a desired power transmit efficiency (TX power over battery power drain). FOMs can also represent “keep out” areas where optimal performance may not be desirable. FOMs can also mathematically combine performance parameters (e.g., TX power+RX power).
Once the designer has defined one or more desirable performance characteristics of the communication device 100 in the form of FOMs, the computer 702 can be adapted in step 808 to find a range of tuning states that achieve the desired FOMs by sweeping with a common mathematical model in fine increments to find global optimal performance with respect to the desired FOMs. The computer 702 can be adapted in step 810 to present the user the range of tuning states that achieve the desired FOMs on a per band and per use case basis. The user can select in step 812 portions of the tuning states for storage in a look-up table which can be utilized by the communication device 100 during operation.
During normal operation by consumers, the communication device 100 can detect a number of possible use cases for the device. For instance, the communication device 100 can detect that the consumer has invoked a call or has answered a called based on the state of call processing software operating in the communication device 100. The call processing software operating in the communication device 100 can also detect which band or sub-band is being used for the active call. The communication device 100 can further detect that a flip housing assembly has been opened with a common electro-mechanical sensor.
The communication device 100 can also detect from the call processing software that a Bluetooth headset feature, and a speakerphone feature are disabled while a communication session is taking place. The communication device 100 can also detect with a common electro-mechanical sensor whether an antenna has been raised or is in the closed position. The communication device 100 can also detect with a proximity sensor and/or an orientation sensor (e.g., an accelerometer) whether the device is near a body part of the user, and whether the device is in a horizontal or vertical position.
There are innumerable detectable use cases that are contemplated by the present disclosure. These detectable states in whole or in part can provide the communication device 100 a means to predict a likelihood of any number of use cases. Once a user case is detected, the communication device 100 can index through the look-up table of
Method 1500 can begin with step 1502 in which a communication device 100 establishes a communication session with the communication system 1400. The communication session can be a wireless communication session utilizing common wireless access technologies such a GSM, CDMA, UMTS, WiFi, Bluetooth, or combinations thereof. In one embodiment, the communication device 100 can identify in step 1504 the communication system 100 from an identifier supplied thereby. The communication identifier can be a public land mobile network (PLMN) identifier as defined by 3GPP standard, a service set identifier (SSID), Cell Identifier (CELL Id in the 3GPP standard) or another form of identification which can identify a communication element of the communication system 1400 such as a cellular base station or other common wireless access points such as a WiFi access point.
In step 1506, the communication device 100 can select a profile according to the identifier. The profile can represent a set of instructions, a look-up table, or combinations thereof for provisioning the tunable matching network 202. The profile can among other things include time-of-day provisioning information, provisioning information associated with an operating location of the communication device, provisioning information for tuning a receiver portion of the communication device, or provisioning information for tuning a transmitter portion of the communication device.
Any one or combinations of the foregoing embodiments of provisioning information can direct the communication device 100 to provision the tunable matching network 202 to adapt performance parameters of the transmitter portion and/or the receiver portion of the transceiver 102 of
The provisioning information included in the profile can be determined by a network operator from uplink and/or downlink communication characteristics of the communication system 1400. The performance parameters of the communication device 100 can include without limitation power consumption of the communication device 100, radiated power of the transmitter portion of the communication device, linearity of the transmitter portion, a receive sensitivity of the receiver portion of the communication device, or channel selectivity of the receiver portion.
The provisioning information can be used to control an operating efficiency of the transceiver 102, battery life, or other common desirable performance metrics. The provisioning information can also be used to improve an operating characteristic of the receiver portion of the communication device 100 at the expense of an operating characteristic of the transmitter portion of the communication device 100 and vice-versa.
In another embodiment, the tunable matching network 202 can be used as a tunable filter network for controlling an operation of the receiver or transmitter portions. The provisioning information supplied in the profile can be used for example to alter a filter that detunes the receiver portion, which may have useful consequences as will be discussed below.
Steps 1508-1512 present additional embodiments for utilizing a profile. For example, in one embodiment, the communication device 100 can receive a request from the communication element of the communication system 1400 to utilize a particular profile, which it can select in step 1510. In one embodiment, the communication device 100 can receive the profile (a supplement to an existing profile, or a modification thereto) from the communication element in step 1512. Responsive to the embodiments of steps 1504-1512, the communication device 100 can provision the tunable matching network 202 in step 1514.
In another embodiment, the communication device 100 can be programmed to determine a need to auto-tune without instructions from the communication system 1400 and/or independent of the communication system 1400 from which the communication device operates. The communication device 100 can make this determination in step 516. The auto-tune condition can be determined from the profile which can identify receiver or transmitter operating characteristics that warrant an adjustment to the performance parameters of the communication device 100 by way of an adaptation of tuning states of the tunable matching network 202. For instance, if the link margin for the receiver and transmitter is high, the communication device 100 can independently choose to auto provision the tunable matching network 202 to improve the power consumption of the communication device.
The adapted performance parameters of the communication device 100 managed according to aspects of the profile described above can be used by a communication element of the communication system 1400 to adapt in step 1520 communication services of a population of communication devices served thereby. For example, a communication element can offer increased system capacity as a result of a number of communication devices 100 optimizing transmitter linearity to reduce in band interference, and thereby improve overall system capacity.
Generally speaking, different network operators (carriers) can deploy their infrastructure (base stations and antenna towers and antenna systems) differently from each other, and correspondingly some networks may be “uplink limited” and some “downlink limited”. This means that in some networks the link between the handset transmitter and the base station receiver may have less total loss in it than the link between the base station transmitter and handset receiver or vice-versa. In such situations the tunable matching network 202 in the handset could be altered to accommodate such differences.
For instance, in the case where a network is downlink limited it would be appropriate for the handset antenna tuner of the communication device 100 to emphasize the improvement in the match to the antenna in the handset's receive band at the expense of the match in the transmit band. This can be a way to improve overall performance or link margin to that particular network. Conversely if a network were uplink limited, then it can be appropriate to improve the match in the handset's transmit band at the expense of the receive band.
If this information is known, the tuner look-up tables referred to above can be expanded to include the input of network identity (PLMN for example), with appropriately different tuner settings for different communication networks. In addition, even within a network (PLMN) the look-up table can be specific to individual Cell Site Identities, if the network operator knows of a particular issue in certain locations within his network.
There is yet another aspect to consider when determining the settings for a tunable matching network 202, and that is to autonomously determine the optimal settings based upon actual transmitter and receiver conditions in the handset itself. Cellular handset transmitters, for example, commonly utilize power amplifiers which can be adjusted to a range of output power levels upon direction from the base station to which they are communicating. The handset controller can be aware of the transmit power setting at any instant, and it can also be aware of the received signal strength being received from the base station at any instant as well.
With the knowledge of these transmit and receive levels the controller can determine if the antenna match should be altered to improve the match in the transmit or receive band. In the case where both the uplink and downlink paths have margin (the transmitter is at a lower power level and the receiver sees high signal power) the tunable match can be adjusted to a position that optimizes transmitter efficiency (to reduce current drain, and thereby improve battery life) or to a position that optimizes transmitter linearity (to reduce in band interference to improve overall system capacity).
Another potential use of the tunable matching network 202 is to intentionally de-tune, or degrade the performance of the match in the receive band, while maintaining a good match (for either transmit power, efficiency or linearity) in the transmit band of the handset. A reason for doing so would be to make the receiver less sensitive and correspondingly less susceptible to local interfering signals. As before, by detecting a strong desired received signal the handset controller can autonomously set the tuner to a state that would increase the loss in the receiver path inside the handset while maintaining a good match to the transmitter.
Another embodiment is to consider the tunable matching network 202 as a tunable filter network. Correspondingly, intentionally detuning the network in the receive band is equivalent to tuning the passband of a filter to include only the transmit band but to partially reject the receive band.
It is also possible that a network operator would prefer that when handsets are in a situation with good link margin (both uplink and downlink) they preferentially tune the antenna match to a position that would improve either current drain or linearity based upon the actual time of day. During particular times of the workday (during rush hours for example) the network operator may prefer to optimize handset linearity to optimize network capacity during those times of heavy phone-call traffic.
Such network preferential tuning can be loaded into the look-up table at the time the handset is manufactured, but it can be useful for the operator to be able to re-program, or provision this information over the air. This would give the operator flexibility to enhance the operation of communication devices 100 operating in the communication system 1400 each time changes are made to the system, or conditions are discovered in the system that impact the overall performance which could be improved by modifying how the handsets work when encountering those conditions. There are several ways this provisioning can be accomplished in wireless networks. For example, profiles can be supplied in Short Message Services (SMS), WAP PUSH, Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) message, direct data channel connection over an internet protocol, SIM Took Kit messages, an over the air standard specified by the Open Mobile Alliance (OMA), or via proprietary methods such as used in iPhone or Android based phone.
Another implementation of a tuning application can be to incorporate it into the 3GPP SIM Toolkit specification. The tuning application can receive lookup table information from a corresponding tuning application in the communication system. This lookup table can contain any number of parameters relating to how the handset should perform such as linearity, detuning, transmit weighted, receive weighted, battery life weighted, etc. The network tuning application can also furnish other specific information relating to when or where a particular performance profile should be chosen, for example:
The handset can, with the proper lookup table, apply all of these parameters to a specific performance profile. The network tuning application can select specific profiles for handset manufacturers and model and target these handsets with specific performance profiles with the goal of attaining more uniform performance in particular communication cell areas.
From the foregoing descriptions, it would be evident to an artisan with ordinary skill in the art that the aforementioned embodiments can be modified, reduced, or enhanced without departing from the scope and spirit of the claims described below. For example, methods 800 and 1400 of
Other suitable modifications can be applied to the present disclosure. Accordingly, the reader is directed to the claims for a fuller understanding of the breadth and scope of the present disclosure.
The machine may comprise a server computer, a client user computer, a personal computer (PC), a tablet PC, a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a control system, a network router, switch or bridge, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine. It will be understood that a device of the present disclosure includes broadly any electronic device that provides voice, video or data communication. Further, while a single machine is illustrated, the term “machine” shall also be taken to include any collection of machines that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein.
The computer system 1600 may include a processor 1602 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU, or both), a main memory 1604 and a static memory 1606, which communicate with each other via a bus 1608. The computer system 1600 may further include a video display unit 1610 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD), a flat panel, a solid state display, or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 1600 may include an input device 1612 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 1614 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 1616, a signal generation device 1618 (e.g., a speaker or remote control) and a network interface device 1620.
The disk drive unit 1616 may include a machine-readable medium 1622 on which is stored one or more sets of instructions (e.g., software 1624) embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein, including those methods illustrated above. The instructions 1624 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 1604, the static memory 1606, and/or within the processor 1602 during execution thereof by the computer system 1600. The main memory 1604 and the processor 1602 also may constitute machine-readable media.
Dedicated hardware implementations including, but not limited to, application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic arrays and other hardware devices can likewise be constructed to implement the methods described herein. Applications that may include the apparatus and systems of various embodiments broadly include a variety of electronic and computer systems. Some embodiments implement functions in two or more specific interconnected hardware modules or devices with related control and data signals communicated between and through the modules, or as portions of an application-specific integrated circuit. Thus, the example system is applicable to software, firmware, and hardware implementations.
In accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure, the methods described herein are intended for operation as software programs running on a computer processor. Furthermore, software implementations can include, but not limited to, distributed processing or component/object distributed processing, parallel processing, or virtual machine processing can also be constructed to implement the methods described herein.
The present disclosure contemplates a machine readable medium containing instructions 1624, or that which receives and executes instructions 1624 from a propagated signal so that a device connected to a network environment 1626 can send or receive voice, video or data, and to communicate over the network 1626 using the instructions 1624. The instructions 1624 may further be transmitted or received over a network 1626 via the network interface device 1620.
While the machine-readable medium 1622 is shown in an example embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present disclosure.
The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to: solid-state memories such as a memory card or other package that houses one or more read-only (non-volatile) memories, random access memories, or other re-writable (volatile) memories; magneto-optical or optical medium such as a disk or tape; and/or a digital file attachment to e-mail or other self-contained information archive or set of archives is considered a distribution medium equivalent to a tangible storage medium. Accordingly, the disclosure is considered to include any one or more of a machine-readable medium or a distribution medium, as listed herein and including art-recognized equivalents and successor media, in which the software implementations herein are stored.
Although the present specification describes components and functions implemented in the embodiments with reference to particular standards and protocols, the disclosure is not limited to such standards and protocols. Each of the standards for Internet and other packet switched network transmission (e.g., TCP/IP, UDP/IP, HTML, HTTP) represent examples of the state of the art. Such standards are periodically superseded by faster or more efficient equivalents having essentially the same functions. Accordingly, replacement standards and protocols having the same functions are considered equivalents.
The illustrations of embodiments described herein are intended to provide a general understanding of the structure of various embodiments, and they are not intended to serve as a complete description of all the elements and features of apparatus and systems that might make use of the structures described herein. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. Other embodiments may be utilized and derived therefrom, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Figures are also merely representational and may not be drawn to scale. Certain proportions thereof may be exaggerated, while others may be minimized. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein, individually and/or collectively, by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept if more than one is in fact disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be appreciated that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b), requiring an abstract that will allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/577,178 filed Oct. 10, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2745067 | True | May 1956 | A |
3117279 | Ludvigson | Jan 1964 | A |
3160832 | Beitman | Dec 1964 | A |
3390337 | Beitman | Jun 1968 | A |
3443231 | Roza | May 1969 | A |
3509500 | McNair | Apr 1970 | A |
3571716 | Hill | Mar 1971 | A |
3590385 | Sabo | Jun 1971 | A |
3601717 | Kuecken | Aug 1971 | A |
3794941 | Templin | Feb 1974 | A |
3919644 | Smolka | Nov 1975 | A |
3990024 | Hou | Nov 1976 | A |
3995237 | Brunner | Nov 1976 | A |
4186359 | Kaegebein | Jan 1980 | A |
4201960 | Skutta | May 1980 | A |
4227256 | O'Keefe | Oct 1980 | A |
4383441 | Willis | May 1983 | A |
4476578 | Gaudin | Oct 1984 | A |
4493112 | Bruene | Jan 1985 | A |
4509019 | Banu et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4777490 | Sharma | Oct 1988 | A |
4799066 | Deacon | Jan 1989 | A |
4965607 | Wilkins | Oct 1990 | A |
4970478 | Townley et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5032805 | Elmer | Jul 1991 | A |
5142255 | Chang | Aug 1992 | A |
5177670 | Shinohara | Jan 1993 | A |
5195045 | Keane | Mar 1993 | A |
5200826 | Seong | Apr 1993 | A |
5212463 | Babbitt | May 1993 | A |
5216392 | Fraser et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230091 | Vaisanen et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5243358 | Sanford | Sep 1993 | A |
5258728 | Taniyoshi | Nov 1993 | A |
5276912 | Siwiak | Jan 1994 | A |
5301358 | Gaskill | Apr 1994 | A |
5307033 | Koscica | Apr 1994 | A |
5310358 | Johnson | May 1994 | A |
5312790 | Sengupta | May 1994 | A |
5334958 | Babbitt | Aug 1994 | A |
5371473 | Trinh | Dec 1994 | A |
5409889 | Das | Apr 1995 | A |
5427988 | Sengupta | Jun 1995 | A |
5430417 | Martin | Jul 1995 | A |
5446447 | Carney | Aug 1995 | A |
5448252 | Ali | Sep 1995 | A |
5451567 | Das | Sep 1995 | A |
5451914 | Stengel | Sep 1995 | A |
5457394 | McEwan | Oct 1995 | A |
5472935 | Yandrofski | Dec 1995 | A |
5479139 | Koscica | Dec 1995 | A |
5486491 | Sengupta | Jan 1996 | A |
5496795 | Das | Mar 1996 | A |
5502372 | Quan | Mar 1996 | A |
5524281 | Bradley | Jun 1996 | A |
5561407 | Koscica | Oct 1996 | A |
5564086 | Cygan | Oct 1996 | A |
5593495 | Masuda | Jan 1997 | A |
5635433 | Sengupta | Jun 1997 | A |
5635434 | Sengupta | Jun 1997 | A |
5640042 | Koscica | Jun 1997 | A |
5679624 | Das | Oct 1997 | A |
5689219 | Piirainen | Nov 1997 | A |
5693429 | Sengupta | Dec 1997 | A |
5694134 | Barnes | Dec 1997 | A |
5699071 | Urakami | Dec 1997 | A |
5766697 | Sengupta | Jun 1998 | A |
5778308 | Sroka | Jul 1998 | A |
5786727 | Sigmon | Jul 1998 | A |
5812943 | Suzuki | Sep 1998 | A |
5830591 | Sengupta | Nov 1998 | A |
5846893 | Sengupta | Dec 1998 | A |
5874926 | Tsuru | Feb 1999 | A |
5880635 | Satoh | Mar 1999 | A |
5886867 | Chivukula | Mar 1999 | A |
5892482 | Coleman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5926751 | Vlahos et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929717 | Richardson | Jul 1999 | A |
5963871 | Zhinong | Oct 1999 | A |
5969582 | Boesch | Oct 1999 | A |
5973568 | Shapiro et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5990766 | Zhang | Nov 1999 | A |
6008759 | Tangemann et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009124 | Smith | Dec 1999 | A |
6020787 | Kim | Feb 2000 | A |
6029075 | Das | Feb 2000 | A |
6045932 | Jia | Apr 2000 | A |
6061025 | Jackson | May 2000 | A |
6064865 | Kuo et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074971 | Chiu | Jun 2000 | A |
6096127 | Dimos | Aug 2000 | A |
6100733 | Dortu | Aug 2000 | A |
6101102 | Brand | Aug 2000 | A |
6133868 | Butler et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133883 | Munson | Oct 2000 | A |
6172385 | Duncombe | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6215644 | Dhuler | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266528 | Farzaneh | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281847 | Lee | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6343208 | Ying | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6377142 | Chiu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377217 | Zhu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377440 | Zhu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384785 | Kamogawa | May 2002 | B1 |
6404614 | Zhu | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408190 | Ying | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414562 | Bouisse | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415562 | Donaghue | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438360 | Alberth, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452776 | Chakravorty | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461930 | Akram | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6466774 | Okabe | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6492883 | Liang | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6514895 | Chiu | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525630 | Zhu | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531936 | Chiu | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535076 | Partridge | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535722 | Rosen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538603 | Chen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556102 | Sengupta | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556814 | Klomsdorf | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570462 | Edmonson | May 2003 | B2 |
6590468 | du Toit | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6590541 | Schultze | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597265 | Liang | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6608603 | Alexopoulos | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6624786 | Boyle | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628962 | Katsura | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6657595 | Phillips | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661638 | Jackson | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670256 | Yang | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6710651 | Forrester | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6724611 | Mosley | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724890 | Bareis | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737179 | Sengupta | May 2004 | B2 |
6759918 | Du Toit | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6765540 | Toncich | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768472 | Alexopoulos | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774077 | Sengupta | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795712 | Vakilian | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6825818 | Toncich | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839028 | Lee | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845126 | Dent | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859104 | Toncich | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862432 | Kim | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6864757 | Du Toit | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6868260 | Jagielski | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6888714 | Shaw | May 2005 | B2 |
6905989 | Ellis | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6907234 | Karr | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914487 | Doyle | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6920315 | Wilcox et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6943078 | Zheng | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6946847 | Nishimori | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949442 | Barth | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961368 | Dent et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964296 | Memory | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965837 | Vintola | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6987493 | Chen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993297 | Smith | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7009455 | Toncich | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7071776 | Forrester | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7107033 | D du Toit | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113614 | Rhoads | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7151411 | Martin | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7176634 | Kitamura | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7176845 | Fabrega-Sanchez | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180467 | Fabrega-Sanchez | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7221327 | Toncich | May 2007 | B2 |
7298329 | Diament | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7312118 | Kiyotoshi | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7332980 | Zhu | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7332981 | Matsuno | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339527 | Sager | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7426373 | Clingman | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427949 | Channabasappa et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7468638 | Tsai | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7528674 | Kato et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7535080 | Zeng et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7535312 | McKinzie | May 2009 | B2 |
7539527 | Jang | May 2009 | B2 |
7567782 | Liu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7596357 | Nakamata | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7667663 | Hsiao | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7711337 | McKinzie | May 2010 | B2 |
7714678 | du Toit et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7728693 | du Toit et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7768400 | Lawrence et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7795990 | du Toit | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7830320 | Shamblin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7852170 | McKinzie | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7865154 | Mendolia | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7969257 | du Toit | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8170510 | Knudsen et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8213886 | Blin | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8217731 | McKinzie et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8454882 | Chan et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478344 | Rofougaran et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8680934 | McKinzie et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8773019 | Pham et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8803631 | Greene et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8860525 | Spears et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8948889 | Spears et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8957742 | Spears et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9026062 | Greene et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9083405 | Christoffersson et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9119152 | Blin | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9231643 | Greene et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9374113 | Manssen et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9473194 | Domino et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9698858 | Hoirup et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
20020109642 | Gee et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020167963 | Joa-Ng | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187780 | Souissi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191703 | Ling | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193088 | Jung | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030060227 | Sekine | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071300 | Yashima | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030114124 | Higuchi | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030137464 | Foti et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030184319 | Nishimori et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030193997 | Dent | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199286 | D du Toit | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210203 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030210206 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030232607 | Le Bars | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040009754 | Smith | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040125027 | Rubinshteyn et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137950 | Bolin | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040202399 | Kochergin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204027 | Park | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040257293 | Friedrich | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050032488 | Pehlke | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042994 | Otaka | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059362 | Kalajo | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082636 | Yashima | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093624 | Forrester et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130608 | Forse | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050215204 | Wallace | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227627 | Cyr et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050227633 | Dunko | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050260962 | Nazrul et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050280588 | Fujikawa et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282503 | Onno | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003537 | Sinha | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009165 | Alles | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030277 | Cyr et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060099952 | Prehofer | May 2006 | A1 |
20060119511 | Collinson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060160501 | Mendolia | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060183433 | Mori et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183442 | Chang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195161 | Li et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060252391 | Poilasne et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281423 | Caimi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070001924 | Hirabayashi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013483 | Stewart | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070035458 | Ohba | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042725 | Poilasne | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042734 | Ryu | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070063788 | Zhu | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070080888 | Mohamadi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082611 | Terranova et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085609 | Itkin | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070121267 | Kotani et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142014 | Wilcox | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149146 | Hwang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070171879 | Bourque | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070184825 | Lim et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194859 | Brobston et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197180 | McKinzie et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200766 | McKinzie | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070222697 | Caimi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070248238 | Abreu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070285326 | McKinzie | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080030165 | Lisac et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055016 | Morris | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080055168 | Massey et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080094149 | Brobston | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080122553 | McKinzie | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122723 | Rofougaran | May 2008 | A1 |
20080158076 | Walley | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080174508 | Iwai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080261544 | Blin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266190 | Ohba et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274706 | Blin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288028 | Larson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090051611 | Shamblin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090088093 | Nentwig et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109880 | Kim et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121963 | Greene | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149136 | Rofougaran | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090215446 | Hapsari et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090231220 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253385 | Dent et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100053009 | Rofougaran | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073103 | Spears et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100731013 | Spears et al. | Mar 2010 | |
20100085260 | McKinzie | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105425 | Asokan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107067 | Vaisanen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100134215 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156552 | McKinzie | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100214189 | Kanazawa | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232474 | Rofougaran | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100277363 | Kainulainen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302106 | Knudsen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304688 | Knudsen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110012792 | Krenz | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110039504 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110105023 | Scheer et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121079 | Lawrence et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110122040 | Wakabayashi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110183633 | Ohba et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110285511 | Maguire et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299438 | Mikhemar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309980 | Ali et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120084537 | Indukuru et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120214421 | Hoirup et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120309332 | Liao et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130076579 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076580 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130293425 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20160241276 | Zhu | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160269055 | Greene et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160277129 | Manssen | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160322991 | McKinzie | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160336916 | Du Toit et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160373146 | Manssen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170085244 | Manssen et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101640949 | Feb 2010 | CN |
201765685 | Mar 2011 | CN |
19614655 | Oct 1997 | DE |
0685936 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0909024 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1137192 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1298810 | Apr 2006 | EP |
2214085 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2328233 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2638640 | Jul 2014 | EP |
3131157 | Feb 2017 | EP |
03276901 | Mar 1990 | JP |
10209722 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2009064968 | May 2009 | WO |
2010028521 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010121914 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011044592 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011084716 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011102143 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011133657 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011028453 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012085932 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Bezooijen, A. et al., “A GSM/EDGE/WCDMA Adaptive Series-LC Matching Network Using RF-MEMS Switches”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, No. 10, Oct. 2008, 2259-2268. |
Hyun, S. , “Effects of strain on the dielectric properties of tunable dielectric SrTi03 thin films”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 2, Jul. 9, 2001. |
Ida, I. et al., “An Adaptive Impedence Matching System and Its Application to Mobile Antennas”, TENCON 2004, IEEE Region 10 Conference, See Abstract ad p. 544, Nov. 21-24, 2004, 543-547. |
Manssen, “Method and Apparatus for Managing Interference in a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/326,206, filed Apr. 20, 2010. |
McKinzie, “Adaptive Impedance Matching Module (AIMM) Control Architectures”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/293,544, filed Nov. 10, 2011. |
McKinzie, “Adaptive Impedance Matching Module (AIMM) Control Architectures”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/293,550, filed Nov. 10, 2011. |
McKinzie, “Method and Apparatus for Adaptive Impedance Matching”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/217,748, filed Aug. 25, 2011. |
Mendolia, “Method and Apparatus for Tuning a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/035,417, filed Feb. 25, 2011. |
Paratek Microwave, Inc., , “Method and Appartus for Tuning Antennas in a Communication Device”, International Application No. PCT/US11/59620; Filed Nov. 7, 2011. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, International Application No. PCT/US2010/046241, dated Mar. 2, 2011. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, International Application No. PCT/US2010/056413, dated Jul. 27, 2011. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, PCT Application No. PCT/US08/005085, dated Jul. 2, 2008. |
Pervez, N.K., “High Tunability barium strontium titanate thin films for RF circuit applications”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, No. 19, Nov. 8, 2004. |
Petit, Laurent, “MEMS-Switched Parasitic-Antenna Array for Radiation Pattern Diversity”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, No. 9, Sep. 2009, 2624-2631. |
Qiao, et al., “Antenna Impedance Mismatch Measurement and Correction for Adaptive COMA Transceivers”, IEEE, Jan. 2005. |
Qiao, et al., “Measurement of Antenna Load Impedance for Power Amplifiers”, The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, Sep. 13, 2004. |
Stemmer, Susanne, “Low-loss tunable capacitors fabricated directly on gold bottom electrodes”, Applied Physics Letters 88, 112905, Mar. 15, 2006. |
Taylor, T.R., “Impact of thermal strain on the dielectric constant of sputtered barium strontium titanate thin films”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, No. 11, Mar. 18, 2002. |
Tombak, Ali, “Tunable Barium Strontium Titanate Thin Film Capacitors for RF and Microwave Applications”, IEEE Microwave and Wireles Components Letters, vol. 12, Jan. 2002. |
Xu, Hongtao, “Tunable Microwave Integrated Circuits using BST Thin Film Capacitors with Device”, Integrated Ferroelectrics, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering, University of California, 2005, Apr. 2005. |
Zuo, S., “Eigenmode Decoupling for Mimo Loop-Antenna Based on 180 Coupler”, Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters, vol. 26, Aug. 2011, 11-20. |
“European Search Report”, 16151299.1 search report, dated 2016. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 16155235.1, dated May 3, 2016. |
“Search Report”, ROC (Taiwan) Patent Application No. 101117467, English Translation, dated Apr. 12, 2016, 1 page. |
Canadian Office Action, Application No. 2,821,173, dated Oct. 17, 2016. |
EPO, “Extended European Search Report”, EP16188956.3, dated Jan. 9, 2017, 1-9. |
Extended European Search Report for 12749235.3, dated Jun. 8, 2017. |
Canadian IPO, “Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2017”, dated Mar. 10, 2017, 1-3. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150214986 A1 | Jul 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12577178 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 14684701 | US |