1. Technical Field
The invention relates to web-based applications. More particularly, the invention relates to self-customizing and maintaining the navigation history of a web application.
2. Description of the Prior Art
A typical business web application contains many logical modules. For example an Electronic Discovery Management System (EDMS) application may contain a set of pages responsible for editing information about legal matter, sending hold notices, maintaining data sources, maintaining lists of employees, etc.
Very often, there is a need to temporarily leave one module of the application in order to perform certain activities in another module and then navigate back. For example an EDMS user might start editing recipients of a hold notice at a hold notice module, then go to list of employees at a different module, copy a few people into a clipboard, then return back to the hold notice module, and paste the list from the clipboard.
In this disclosure, a module is a set of related pages logically related to each other. For example a Hold Notice module may contain a list of holds, a hold edit page, a hold view page, a view and edit recipients pages, etc. Usually it is fast and easy for a user to navigate within the module and no extra navigation mechanisms are necessary. However, when it comes to navigation between modules, this is not the case. For example, if a user wants to navigate to a matter view page from outside the matter module the user needs to:
Likewise, navigation to the data source view page may have similar steps. Therefore it would be desirable to somehow navigate directly from the current data source to the current matter without performing these steps again and again.
It has been found that, typically, when a user needs to navigate back, such as in the example above from the People module to the Hold Notices module, the following navigation mechanisms are offered by prior art applications:
1. Browser back button (with or without an associated Back button menu.) The user clicks the Back button and the browser displays pages from its history store until the user finds and selects the right page. This solution has the following drawbacks:
2. Provide a “Back” link on an application page which points to the page from where the user came. For example, on an employee search result page, provide a link back to the Hold Notice recipient edit page. Major disadvantages of this approach include:
None of the above solutions are particularly good. There is a need for a navigation solution which is free from above mentioned drawbacks, yet doesn't have too many drawbacks of its own.
A method and apparatus are provided for maintaining the navigation history of a web application that includes techniques for maintaining those pages that are considered valuable. The method and apparatus further include techniques for registering a visited page into the application navigation history, displaying a particular history menu of a web page, and, to pass stateful information, using a redirecting technique that includes redirecting a user to a history page to obtain the stateful information once the user has chosen a menu item.
A method and apparatus are provided for maintaining the navigation history of a web application that includes techniques for maintaining those pages that are considered valuable. The method and apparatus further include techniques for registering a visited page into the application navigation history, displaying a particular history menu of a web page, and, to pass stateful information, using a redirecting technique that includes redirecting a user to a history page to obtain the stateful information once the user has chosen a menu item.
Functional Overview
An embodiment provides a solution which includes maintaining an application's own navigation history and letting a user choose an item from a history picker when she wants to navigate back. A picker is a navigation menu displaying the links pointing to the pages which are stored in application-owned browsing history. Hereinafter, an embodiment of such method and apparatus is referred to as Application Based Recent History (ABRH).
Compared to the browser navigation history of the prior art, ABRH is not built as a stack. Instead, the history contains a list of the last N important navigation events. According to an embodiment, a particular navigation event is not required to reside on the current navigation path of the user in order to be included into the instant history.
An example showing a user navigating to a desired page using browser history according to the prior art can be described with reference to
Data Source Edit page 310 being purged from the history is not the case with ABRH which selectively remembers important pages in the history regardless of their location in the navigation path. Thus, suppose a user, according to an embodiment of ABRH, navigated from a Recipient Edit page to a Data Source edit page of EDMS described above. Then, suppose, she navigated back to Recipient Edit page and then she navigated to the List of People page. Suppose further that Data Source Edit page happened to be important for user business and, therefore, the decision was made that each time a user visits Data Source Edit page, the page is added to ABRH. According to an embodiment, the user at the List of People page can navigate back to Data Source Edit page, because it was added to the history.
Thus, it should be appreciated that according to prior art methodologies, such access to the Data Source Edit page at this stage of the navigation would be not possible when the built-in browser Back button was used.
It should be appreciated that the conceptual difference between the prior art browser and ABRH is very significant: browsers have no way to understand which pages are important and which are not. Therefore, browsers act according to the “best guess” scenario which is that, most likely, the user will want to return back to pages which are on the main navigation path. According to an embodiment, the application knows which pages are important, thus the application can use a better predicting algorithm.
It should be appreciated that from the user experience, using ABRH resolves disadvantages, e.g. of the first and second approaches described above, at a reasonable price. For example see
According to prior art the following will be displayed in the navigation history as a result of the user's particular navigation actions above:
It should be appreciated that out of these pages only a few (e.g., Recipient Edit, Data Source View and Data Source Edit) may be considered valuable enough to be maintained in the history. According to an embodiment, the history looks like the following:
One or more embodiments of ABRH provide the following:
For example. suppose there is a page called matterTargets.jsp. The page reads a variable “matter_id” from the user session, reads from the database a list of custodians associated with the matter using the value of “matter_id” as a query parameter and displays the information to the user so that the user can add or remove custodians from the matter.
Now imagine the user using this page to edit custodians for matter X. Then he decides to navigate to the matter detail of the matter Y and then navigate back to matter X using the browser “Back” button. At the time he navigated to Y matter, the “matter_id” session variable got updated with Y's matter's id. After the user clicks the Back button the page matterTargets.jsp showing the custodians for matter X is displayed from browser cache. The user adds another custodian to the matter and saves changes. He is confident that the current matter is X because the cached page tells him so. But on the server “matter_id” session variable is populated with Y's matter id. As a result a custodian is added to the matter Y instead of X.
To avoid this unintended consequence, according to prior art, programmers make the page expire so it is impossible to use the browser Back button.
In contrast, an embodiment solves the problem the following way: At the time the user entered matterTargets.jsp, this fact that the user entered matterTargets.jsp together with current matter id is stored in ABRH. Thus, when the user wants to navigate back to matterTargets.jsp for matter X, the system prepopulates the “matter_id” session variable with the value that was initially stored in the corresponding ABRH record. Only after that the browser requests the matterTargets.jsp page. Thus the data on server side is guaranteed to be in sync with the data on browser side. This became possible because the application understands the difference between various pages and can perform custom logic before redirecting the user to a particular page.
An example data table used to store an ABRH record according to an embodiment can be described with reference to
It should be appreciated that such schema depicted in
It should further be appreciated that the user navigation history doesn't need to be flooded with unimportant pages to which a user may never return. See the example above as described by
An example is shown on
In addition to solving the issues which are inherent to other prior art navigation models, ABRH, according to an embodiment, provides the following possibilities:
A Recent Activity Navigation menu according to an embodiment can be described with reference to
It should be appreciated that further in
On
QA Test VI item represents a virtual interview view page.
In the second group 612 all the menu items lead to view pages of various data source records. Therefore they display “barrel” icons representing data sources.
The third group 614 represents organizations and contains records for pointing to organization editing pages.
All menu items display the titles of objects. Only the pages that meaningful for the user are stored in the history.
An embodiment of ABRH contains the following conceptual components, which are described in further detail below.
An embodiment includes a persistent store containing ANH entries. The store provides enough information for the application to redirect to a proper page in the proper context. For example, if a user needs to navigate to a matter view page, the history preserves the information about: the fact that this is a matter view page to which the user can navigate and the id of the matter displayed on this page. See
It should be appreciated that that there may be a plurality of ways how to preserve such information. For example and as shown above, in an embodiment, an ABRH record may be designed to store the page URL. That is, in order to call a page, browser needs to know a URL. A URL typically consists of the page name and query parameters which tell the application which object to look at. For example, the page for editing matter information may have a name matterEdit.jsp and require query parameters “?matter_id=23” to tell the page that matter 23 needs to be displayed. This URL can be compiled during ABRH record creation be stored in its entirety in the database or it can be assembled later, such as when the ABRH menu is rendered based on more structured data stored in ABRH table. See
The ABRH records may reside either in user session, e.g. storage area assigned to the user after he logs in and deleted when he logs out or his session expires) or the application database. In the former scenario, the data will not survive a user logout. But the user may still enjoy all other benefits of the solution. In the latter scenario the design of data table requires the data table to distinguish navigation entries belonging to different users, such that each user sees only the user's entries. To achieve that, a record entry should contain a user identifier as shown in
In an embodiment, the persistent store is capable of maintaining a fixed number of navigation entries thus showing only the most recent entries. Alternatively, in an embodiment, filtering out the most recent entries may be delegated to application code responsible for displaying the navigation menu.
As an example of the first approach, if the records are stored in a relational database, each time a new record is entered, the following SQL statement is executed to maintain the number of records per user<=20.
An explanation of the above is as follows:
It should be appreciated that if such a cleanup is performed, the application doesn't need to filter the first N rows when it displays the menu. It can just call the SQL:
The alternative approach is not to perform any cleaning process, but limit the result set when candidates for display are fetched from the database. In this case the fetching SQL may look like:
Here, it is assumed that the table depicted IN
Registering a Visited Page
In an embodiment, particular pages in the application may be worth remembering in ABRH, so that the user can return to these pages later. In order to achieve remembering the particular pages, the following occurs, according to the embodiment:
For example, suppose a user navigated to the matter view page to view the matter “People vs. Smith”. Then he navigated away from the matter view page and after a while navigated back to matter view page for “People vs. Smith”. The first time the user entered the view page for “People vs. Smith” an entry in ABRH was created. The next time the user entered the same page with the same context (“People vs. Smith”), the existing ABRH entry's timestamp was updated as opposed to creating another entry.
It should be appreciated that if the user first views the matter “People vs Smith” and then, at a second time, the user views the matter “Johnson vs. Pupkin”, these two visits to two separate and distinct matter pages result in two different ABRH entries because the context is different.
Displaying Recent Navigation History
In an embodiment, the history is displayed as a simple HTML drop down or a DHTML picker. In an embodiment, a DHTML picker is a kind of menu generated as a block of HTML code, which typically provides a better quality user interface than a typical drop down control. DHTML stands for “Dynamic HTML” meaning that the elements on the page can be dynamically turned on/off or repositioned and is a known term in web development community. Displaying history as a DHTML picker allows for more flexibility such as:
In an embodiment, the menu gets assembled by looking up the ABRH entries in the database and building a user interface menu element based of the contents of these entries. The code which assembles the menu resolves ABRH information into URLs. For example, the first record in
Note that each entry in the menu may contain a plurality of hyperlinks. For example, one hyperlink pointing to a view page and another hyperlink pointing to the edit page of the same object.
Alternatively, URLs inside the menu may point to some intermediate resource and pass information sufficient for this resource to redirect the browser to the final destination. In this scenario, display logic doesn't need to resolve ABRH entries into final URLs.
For example the logic may be modified as follows:
When the notice_redirect.jsp page populates the user session with the current notice id and redirect to the notice edit page, following is sample code for notice_redirect.jsp page:
As described earlier, such technique can be used if the application is “stateful”, i.e. the destination page requires a user session to be pre-populated with some data.
Redirecting a User to a History Page Once the User Chooses a Menu Item
Depending on design of the menu, in an embodiment, redirection is performed when a user clicks the URL on ABRH menu. Or, redirection is performed when the user submits the form by clicking on the item on the menu.
The following should be appreciated. According to an embodiment, it is possible to build a URL so that such URL shows up in ABRH menu as described in the examples above. As well, it is possible to defer building the URL until after the user clicks on the menu item. In the latter scenario, the URLs in the menu item now point to a common place (a redirect page) and pass the ABRH entry ID. Then the redirect page builds the final URL and redirect the browser to it.
High Level Implementation
A high level implementation according to an embodiment can be described with reference to
Computer Implementation
The computer system 1600 includes a processor 1602, a main memory 1604 and a static memory 1606, which communicate with each other via a bus 1608. The computer system 1600 may further include a display unit 1610, for example, a liquid crystal display (LCD) or a cathode ray tube (CRT). The computer system 1600 also includes an alphanumeric input device 1612, for example, a keyboard; a cursor control device 1614, for example, a mouse; a disk drive unit 1616, a signal generation device 1618, for example, a speaker, and a network interface device 1628.
The disk drive unit 1616 includes a machine-readable medium 1624 on which is stored a set of executable instructions, i.e. software, 1626 embodying any one, or all, of the methodologies described herein below. The software 1626 is also shown to reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 1604 and/or within the processor 1602. The software 1626 may further be transmitted or received over a network 1630 by means of a network interface device 1628.
In contrast to the system 1600 discussed above, a different embodiment uses logic circuitry instead of computer-executed instructions to implement processing entities. Depending upon the particular requirements of the application in the areas of speed, expense, tooling costs, and the like, this logic may be implemented by constructing an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) having thousands of tiny integrated transistors. Such an ASIC may be implemented with complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS), transistor-transistor logic (TTL), very large systems integration (VLSI), or another suitable construction. Other alternatives include a digital signal processing chip (DSP), discrete circuitry (such as resistors, capacitors, diodes, inductors, and transistors), field programmable gate array (FPGA), programmable logic array (PLA), programmable logic device (PLD), and the like.
It is to be understood that embodiments may be used as or to support software programs or software modules executed upon some form of processing core (such as the CPU of a computer) or otherwise implemented or realized upon or within a machine or computer readable medium. A machine-readable medium includes any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine, e.g. a computer. For example, a machine readable medium includes read-only memory (ROM); random access memory (RAM); magnetic disk storage media; optical storage media; flash memory devices; electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals, for example, carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.; or any other type of media suitable for storing or transmitting information.
Although the invention is described herein with reference to the preferred embodiment, one skilled in the art will readily appreciate that other applications may be substituted for those set forth herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the invention should only be limited by the Claims included below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5355497 | Cohen-Levy | Oct 1994 | A |
5608865 | Midgely et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5701472 | Koerber et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5875431 | Heckman et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5903879 | Mitchell | May 1999 | A |
5963964 | Nielsen | Oct 1999 | A |
6049812 | Bertram et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6115642 | Brown et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128620 | Pissanos et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151031 | Atkins et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6173270 | Cristofich et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6330572 | Sitka | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332125 | Callen et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343287 | Kumar et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6401079 | Kahn et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6425764 | Lamson | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6460060 | Maddalozzo et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6539379 | Vora et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6553365 | Summerlin et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6607389 | Genevie | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6622128 | Bedell et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6738760 | Krachman | May 2004 | B1 |
6805351 | Nelson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6832205 | Aragones et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6839682 | Blume et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6944597 | Callen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6966053 | Paris et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6976083 | Baskey et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6981210 | Peters et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7076439 | Jaggi | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7082573 | Apparao et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7103602 | Black et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7104416 | Gasco et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7107416 | Stuart et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7120914 | Manthos et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7127470 | Takeya | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7146388 | Stakutis et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162427 | Myrick et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7197716 | Newell et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7206789 | Hurmiz et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225249 | Barry et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7233959 | Kanellos et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7236953 | Cooper et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7240296 | Matthews et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249315 | Moetteli | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7281084 | Todd et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7283985 | Schauerte et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7284985 | Genevie | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7333989 | Sameshima et al. | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7386468 | Calderaro et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7433832 | Bezos et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7451155 | Slackman et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7478096 | Margolus et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7496534 | Olsen et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7502891 | Shachor | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512636 | Verma et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7558853 | Alcorn et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7580961 | Todd et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7594082 | Kilday et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7596541 | deVries et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7614004 | Milic-Frayling et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617458 | Wassom et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7636886 | Wyle et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7720825 | Pelletier et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7730148 | Mace et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7742940 | Shan et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7774721 | Milic-Frayling et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778976 | D'Souza et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7861166 | Hendricks | Dec 2010 | B1 |
7865817 | Ryan et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7895229 | Paknad | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7962843 | Milic-Frayling et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8073729 | Kisin et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
20010053967 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007333 | Scolnik et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010708 | McIntosh | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022982 | Cooperstone et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035480 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020083090 | Jeffrey et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091553 | Callen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091836 | Moetteli | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020095416 | Schwols | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103680 | Newman | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108104 | Song et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020119433 | Callender | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120859 | Lipkin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123902 | Lenore et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143595 | Frank et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143735 | Ayi et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147801 | Gullotta et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162053 | Os | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020178138 | Ender et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184068 | Krishnan et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184148 | Kahn et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004985 | Kagimasa et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014386 | Jurado | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018520 | Rosen | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018663 | Cornette et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030031991 | Genevie | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033295 | Adler et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030036994 | Witzig et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046287 | Joe | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051144 | Williams | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069839 | Whittington et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074354 | Lee et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097342 | Whittington | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110228 | Xu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030139827 | Phelps | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030229522 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002044 | Genevie | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003351 | Sommerer et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019496 | Angle et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040034659 | Steger | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039933 | Martin et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040060063 | Russ et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068432 | Meyerkopf et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040078368 | Excoffier et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088283 | Lissar et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088332 | Lee et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040088729 | Petrovic et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103284 | Barker | May 2004 | A1 |
20040133573 | Miloushev et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040138903 | Zuniga | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143444 | Opsitnick et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040187164 | Kandasamy et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193703 | Loewy et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040204947 | Li et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215619 | Rabold | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040216039 | Lane et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040260569 | Bell et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050060175 | Farber et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071251 | Linden et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071284 | Courson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074734 | Randhawa | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114241 | Hirsch et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050144114 | Ruggieri et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050160361 | Young | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165734 | Vicars et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187813 | Genevie | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203821 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240578 | Biederman, Sr. et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246451 | Silverman et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050283346 | Elkins, II et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060036464 | Cahoy et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036649 | Simske et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060074793 | Hibbert et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095421 | Nagai et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060126657 | Beisiegel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136435 | Nguyen et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143248 | Nakano et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060143464 | Ananthanarayanan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149407 | Markham et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060149735 | DeBie et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156381 | Motoyama | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156382 | Motoyama | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060167704 | Nicholls et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060174320 | Maru et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178917 | Merriam et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060184718 | Sinclair | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195430 | Arumainayagam et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060229999 | Dodell et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230044 | Utiger | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235899 | Tucker | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060242001 | Heathfield | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070016546 | DeVorchik et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070048720 | Billauer | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061156 | Fry et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061157 | Fry et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078900 | Donahue | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070099162 | Sekhar | May 2007 | A1 |
20070100857 | DeGrande et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070112783 | McCreight et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070118556 | Arnold et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156418 | Richter et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162417 | Cozianu et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179829 | Laperi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203810 | Grichnik | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208690 | Schneider et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219844 | Santorine et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220435 | Sriprakash et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070271230 | Hart et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271308 | Bentley et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070271517 | Finkelman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282652 | Childress et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288659 | Zakarian et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080033904 | Ghielmetti et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080034003 | Stakutis et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080059265 | Biazetti et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080059543 | Engel | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080070206 | Perilli | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071561 | Holcombe | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080126156 | Jain et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080147642 | Leffingwell et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148193 | Moetteli | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080148346 | Gill et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154969 | DeBie | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080154970 | DeBie | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177790 | Honwad | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080195597 | Rosenfeld et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080209338 | Li | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080229037 | Bunte et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080294674 | Reztlaff et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301207 | Demarest et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312980 | Boulineau et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319958 | Bhattacharya et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319984 | Proscia et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090037376 | Archer et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043625 | Yao | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090064184 | Chacko et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094228 | Bondurant et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090100021 | Morris et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090106815 | Brodie et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119677 | Stefansson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090150168 | Schmidt | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150866 | Schmidt | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090150906 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090193210 | Hewett et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090241054 | Hendricks | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090249179 | Shieh et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090249446 | Jenkins et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090254572 | Redlich et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287658 | Bennett | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100017756 | Wassom et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100050064 | Liu et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100070315 | Lu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100088583 | Schachter | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100250625 | Olenick et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100251109 | Jin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110191344 | Jin et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2110781 | Oct 2009 | EP |
Entry |
---|
www.pss-systems.com; retrieved from www. Archive.org any linkage dated Dec. 8, 2005, 130 pages. |
PSS Systems, Inc., Atlas LCC for Litigation, pp. 1-2, www.pss-systems.com (Feb. 2008); PSS Systems, Inc., Map Your Data Sources, www.pss-systems.com (Feb. 200*); PSS Systems, Inc., “PSS Systems Provides Legal Hold and Retention Enforcement Automation Solutions for File Shares, Documentum, and other Data Sources” (Feb. 2008). |
PSS Systems, Inc., Preservation Benchmarks for 2007 and Beyond, www.pss-systems.com, pp. 1-3 (2007). |
PSS Systems, Inc., “Industry Leader PSS Systems Launches Third Generation of Atlas Legal Hold and Retention Management Software”, pp. 1-2, www.pss-systems.com (Aug. 2007). |
PSS Systems, Inc., Litigation Communications and Collections, www.pss-systems.com (2006), retrieved online on Dec. 18, 2010 from archive.org, 1 page. |
Zhu, et al.; “Query Expansion Using Web Access Log Files”; Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, vol. 3588/2005, pp. 686-695, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Hedelberg. |
Human Capital Mangement; “mySAP ERP Human Capital Management: Maximizing Workforce Potential”; retrieved from archive.org Aug. 18, 2009 www.sap.com, 1 page. |
Cohasset Associates, “White Paper: Compliance Requirements Assessment, IBM DB2 Records Manager and Record-Enabled Solutions”, Oct. 2004, 54 pgs. |
“HEI Records Management: Guidance on Developing a File Plan”, JISC infoNet, Jan. 2007, 7 pgs. |
Lewis “Digital Mountin—Where Data Resides—Data Discovery from the Inside Out”, available at http://digitalmountain.com/fullaccess/Article3.pdf accessed Mar. 13, 2012, Digital Mountain, Inc., 2004, 5 pgs. |
Sears “E-Discovery: A Tech Tsunami Rolls in”, available at http://www.krollontrack.com/publications/ediscoverybackgroundpaper.pdf, accessed Mar. 13, 2012, National Court Reporters Association, Apr. 2006, 7 pgs. |
“Microsoft Computer Dictionary”, Microsoft Press, Fifth Edition, 2002, p. 499. |